help button home button Am J Pathol R & D Systems
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gotlieb, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Spector, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gotlieb, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Spector, W.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 103, 271-282, Copyright © 1981 by American Society for Investigative Pathology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Migration into an in vitro experimental wound: a comparison of porcine aortic endothelial and smooth muscle cells and the effect of culture irradiation

AI Gotlieb and W Spector

The purpose of this study was to compare the group-cell migration characteristics of endothelial cells (ECs) and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) derived from the same source, the porcine thoracic aorta, as they moved into an experimental in vitro wound. The authors characterized migration by measuring two aspects of the migrating cells: the number of free cells in the wound and the distance of migration of the sheet of cells at the wound edge. The quantitative data showed that ECs migrated into the wound as a sheet of cells, while SMCs migrated as free single cells. In addition, since irradiated cells have been used to study cell migration and since the irradiated cells do undergo some shape changes, the distribution of the cytoskeletal microfilament fibres was compared in migrating irradiated and nonirradiated cells in order to see whether this feature of cell migration was different. Irradiated and nonirradiated migrating ECs showed a strikingly different pattern in the orientation of microfilament bundles when studied by immunofluorescence microscopy with antiserums to myosin and tropomyosin.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. Han, A. E. Woytowich, A. K. Mandal, and L. M. Hiebert
Heparanase Upregulation in High Glucose-Treated Endothelial Cells Is Prevented by Insulin and Heparin
Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2007; 232(7): 927 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Tzima, W. B. Kiosses, M. A. del Pozo, and M. A. Schwartz
Localized Cdc42 Activation, Detected Using a Novel Assay, Mediates Microtubule Organizing Center Positioning in Endothelial Cells in Response to Fluid Shear Stress
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31020 - 31023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. I. Gotlieb, A. Rosenthal, and P. Kazemian
Fibroblast growth factor 2 regulation of mitral valve interstitial cell repair in vitro
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2002; 124(3): 591 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A.-M. Bashour, A. T. Fullerton, M. J. Hart, and G. S. Bloom
IQGAP1, a Rac- and Cdc42-binding Protein, Directly Binds and Cross-links Microfilaments
J. Cell Biol., June 30, 1997; 137(7): 1555 - 1566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
L. M. Hiebert and J.-M. Liu
Dextran Sulphates Protect Porcine Arterial Endothelial Cells from Free Radical Injury
Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 1994; 13(4): 233 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.