help button home button Am J Pathol R & D Systems
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pour, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Muffly, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pour, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Muffly, K.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 110, 75-82, Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Investigative Pathology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Modification of pancreatic carcinogenesis in the hamster model. 2. The effect of partial pancreatectomy

PM Pour, T Donnelly, K Stepan and K Muffly

The effect of partial pancreatectomy (PP) on the pancreatic carcinogenicity of N-nitrosobis (2-oxopropyl)amine (BOP) was investigated in Syrian golden hamsters by subcutaneous injection of a single dose of BOP (20 mg/kg, body weight) given 30 minutes after (Group 1), 1 week after (Group 2), or 1 week before 70% PP (Group 3). Additional groups consisted of animals with PP alone (Group 4), sham operation (laparotomy) followed 30 minutes later by BOP treatment (Group 5), and BOP treatment only (Group 6). The experiment was terminated 46 weeks after BOP administration in each group. The pancreas and extrahepatic bile ducts, including the common duct and gallbladder, were examined histologically. Tumor patterns were compared in hamsters with PP and in the corresponding segments of the pancreas in BOP-treated control groups. The pancreatic cancer incidence was highest (31%) in Group 2 and lowest in Group 1 (3%), a difference that was statistically significant (P less than 0.01). Also, a statistically highly significant larger number of tumors occurred in Group 2, compared with group 1, 3, or 5 (P less than 0.0005). In a comparison of the number of carcinomas per tumor-bearing hamster, there were greater numbers of carcinomas in Group 2 (2.6 carcinomas) than in Groups 1, 3, 5, and 6 (1.0, 1.0, 1.3, and 2.6 tumors, respectively). Moreover, pancreatic tumors in Group 2 hamsters were larger (average diameter, 10 mm) than in Group 1 (4 mm), Group 3 (3.5 mm), Group 5 (4 mm), and Group 6 (average, 9mm). The incidence of extrapancreatic tumors did not vary among the PP groups but was equally lower than those in BOP-treated control groups. The data indicated BOP carcinogenesis was inhibited by surgery (regardless of whether PP was per formed) when the carcinogen was given 30 minutes after the surgery but was significantly enhanced when BOP was administered 1 week after PP. The possible reasons for these conflicting results are discussed. Morphologically all tumors were of ductular, ductal, and mixed ductular-insular patterns and most developed at the resected margins, where proliferation of islets, ducts, and ductules, but not of acinar cells, occurred. The results confirm our view that the ductal and ductular cells are the progenitor cells for BOP-induced pancreatic tumors in hamsters.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.