help button home button Am J Pathol ASIP MEMBERSHIP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Churg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wiggs, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Churg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wiggs, B.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 115, 437-442, Copyright © 1984 by American Society for Investigative Pathology

REGULAR ARTICLES

Fiber size and number in amphibole asbestos-induced mesothelioma

A Churg and B Wiggs

Numbers and sizes of fibers from the lungs of 10 patients who had an amphibole asbestos-induced malignant pleural mesothelioma were analyzed. Amosite was found in 10 lungs and crocidolite in 9; the average ratio of amosite to crocidolite was approximately 14:1. In the 8 patients who were not long-time asbestos insulators , the mean number of amosite fibers was 2.3 X 10(6) fibers/g dry lung, and of crocidolite fibers, 0.2 X 10(6)/g; these values represent an approximately 250-fold increase over those found in the general population. Crocidolite fibers were significantly narrower than amosite fibers (mean width, 0.13 versus 0.23 mu), were significantly shorter (mean length, 4.0 versus 5.8 mu), and had a significantly higher mean aspect (length to width) ratio (48 versus 34). Aspect ratios in general increased with increasing fiber length and decreasing fiber width, but the highest values were found for thin amosite fibers at about 13 mu in length, and thin crocidolite fibers at 8 or 15-17 mu in length. Comparison with data from other asbestos-exposed populations indicates that mesothelioma can be induced by relatively small numbers of amphibole fibers and also indicates that amosite is an effective mesothelial carcinogen in humans. Comparison of these data with epidemiologic and experimental predictions of carcinogenic size ranges for mesothelioma induction implies that either the carcinogenic size range is much broader than has been claimed (in particular, fibers considerably shorter than 8 mu and broader than 0.05 mu can produce mesothelioma), or, alternately, that extraordinarily small absolute numbers of fibers in certain size ranges can induce tumors in humans.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.