help button home button Am J Pathol International Conference on Pathology of Chest Diseases
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sholley, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. W., 3d
Right arrow Articles by Sholley, M. M.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 120, 87-98, Copyright © 1985 by American Society for Investigative Pathology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Comparison of the neovascular effects of stimulated macrophages and neutrophils in autologous rabbit corneas

JW Moore 3d and MM Sholley

The ability of peritoneal exudate macrophages and neutrophils to induce neovascularization was tested in autologous rabbit corneas. Macrophages and neutrophils elicited by proteose peptone or glycogen and macrophages activated by C parvum were purified, pelleted, and implanted 1-2 mm from the corneal limbus. Neovascular responses were evaluated by daily slit-lamp observations and terminal whole-mount and histologic examinations of colloidal carbon-perfused vessels. Pellets of elicited macrophages (5 X 10(5) - 6 X 10(6) cells, 92-98% macrophages) or activated macrophages (2 X 10(6) cells, 87-97% macrophages) induced neovascularization by 4 days in 72-82% of cases. In contrast, pellets of neutrophils (1 X 10(5) - 8 X 10(6) cells, 92- 98% neutrophils) did not induce neovascularization in any case. Histologic examinations at 4-24 hours revealed diapedesis and substantial infiltration of peripheral blood neutrophils in response to implants of either macrophages or neutrophils. Infiltration was diminished by 48 hours and negligible at later times. The finding that neovascular responses were not evoked by implantation of neutrophils or by the accompanying infiltration of neutrophils indicates that neutrophils do not initiate neovascularization in this model. Under similar test conditions, neovascular responses were initiated by implantation of either elicited or activated macrophages.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
T Oshima, K-H Sonoda, C Tsutsumi-Miyahara, H Qiao, T Hisatomi, S Nakao, S Hamano, K Egashira, I F Charo, and T Ishibashi
Analysis of corneal inflammation induced by cauterisation in CCR2 and MCP-1 knockout mice
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2006; 90(2): 218 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Scapini, L. Nesi, M. Morini, E. Tanghetti, M. Belleri, D. Noonan, M. Presta, A. Albini, and M. A. Cassatella
Generation of Biologically Active Angiostatin Kringle 1-3 by Activated Human Neutrophils
J. Immunol., June 1, 2002; 168(11): 5798 - 5804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
G. Melillo, M. Scoccianti, I. Kovesdi, J. Safi Jr, T. Riccioni, and M. C Capogrossi
Gene therapy for collateral vessel development
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 1997; 35(3): 480 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.