help button home button Am J Pathol Angiogenesis Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Picken, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Picken, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, G.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 134, 749-754, Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Investigative Pathology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Light chain deposition disease derived from the kappa I light chain subgroup. Biochemical characterization

MM Picken, B Frangione, B Barlogie, M Luna and G Gallo
Department of Pathology, New York University Medical Center, New York 10016.

The authors biochemically analyzed the nonamyloidotic light chain deposits, the first studied in this way, from a patient with systemic kappa light chain deposition disease (LCDD). The light chain deposits from myocardium were extracted in 6 M guanidine-HCl under reducing conditions, partially purified by column chromatography, and analyzed by immunoblotting and amino-terminal sequencing. The extracted material contained four main bands reactive with anti-kappa antibody: intact kappa light chain (MW, 28 kd), under reducing conditions, and 3 fragments (MW, 20, 16, and 15 kd). As revealed by the aminoterminal sequencing performed on three of the four bands, the intact light chain molecule and two fragments belong to the kappa I subgroup. Thus, similar to light chain amyloid (AL), the deposits in LCDD are derived from both intact light chain and fragments. Unlike in AL, amyloid P component was not detected in the deposits of this patient or those examined previously. The differences demonstrated thus far between AL and LCDD are the lack of fibrils and amyloid P component in LCDD, suggesting that local tissue factors may be responsible for different processing of the light chain deposits in LCDD.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.