help button home button Am J Pathol R & D Systems
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nuovo, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Richart, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nuovo, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Richart, R. M.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 134, 837-842, Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Investigative Pathology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Buffered formalin is the superior fixative for the detection of HPV DNA by in situ hybridization analysis

GJ Nuovo and RM Richart
Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.

In situ hybridization is used commonly for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. There is little information, however, on whether the detection of HPV DNA by in situ hybridization can be affected by the way in which the tissue is fixed. To address this question, the authors compared the hybridization signal using this technique under low stringency conditions for several genital condylomata containing HPV 6 or 11 that were randomly subdivided and fixed in various fixatives for 16 hours. In all cases, the largest proportion of cells with koilocytotic atypia that had detectable HPV DNA was in buffered formalin-fixed tissue (80%), followed by tissue fixed in unbuffered formalin (70%), Hartman's solution (40%), and Bouin's solution (10%). After a high stringency wash, the greatest decrease in the overall hybridization signal was with tissue fixed in Bouin's solution; a minimal decrease was noted with tissue fixed in buffered formalin. Fixation in Bouin's solution for 2 hours gave in situ hybridization results comparable with buffered formalin fixation but with poorer cytologic detail. It is concluded that, of the fixatives studied, buffered formalin is superior for the detection of HPV DNA by in situ hybridization analysis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
W.-S. Chu, Q. Liang, Y. Tang, R. King, K. Wong, M. Gong, M. Wei, J. Liu, S.-H. Feng, S.-C. Lo, et al.
Ultrasound-accelerated Tissue Fixation/Processing Achieves Superior Morphology and Macromolecule Integrity with Storage Stability
J. Histochem. Cytochem., May 1, 2006; 54(5): 503 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
G. J. Nuovo
Co-labeling Using In Situ PCR: A Review
J. Histochem. Cytochem., November 1, 2001; 49(11): 1329 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
G J Nuovo, P MacConnell, and F Gallery
Analysis of nonspecific DNA synthesis during in situ PCR and solution-phase PCR.
Genome Res., October 1, 1994; 4(2): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
G J Nuovo, F Gallery, R Hom, P MacConnell, and W Bloch
Importance of different variables for enhancing in situ detection of PCR-amplified DNA.
Genome Res., May 1, 1993; 2(4): 305 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.