help button home button Am J Pathol Angiogenesis Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamanaka, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Parmley, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamanaka, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Parmley, R. T.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 143, 618-627, Copyright © 1993 by American Society for Investigative Pathology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Ultrastructural morphology, cytochemistry, and morphometry of eosinophil granules in Chediak-Higashi syndrome

SC Hamanaka, CS Gilbert, DA White and RT Parmley
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7810.

Lysosomal enlargement in Chediak-Higashi Syndrome (CHS) occurs to varying degrees in different cell types and has provided insight into the pathophysiology of lysosomal granules. This study was undertaken to determine the extent of involvement of eosinophil crystalloid granules (CGs) and smaller non-crystalloid granules (NCGs) in giant granule formation. Eosinophils from two CHS patients were evaluated after glutaraldehyde fixation and staining for morphologic examination, peroxidase, and complex carbohydrate using uranyl acetate-lead citrate, diaminobenzidine-lead citrate, and periodate-thiocarbohydrazide-silver proteinate (PA-TCH-SP) methods, respectively. Although many CGs appeared normal in shape and size, several CGs appeared enlarged and a few measured over 5 microns in diameter, consistent with giant granule formation in CHS. These giant granules either occasionally contained a single large crystalloid or, more frequently, contained numerous normal- size crystalloids. Enlargement of granules was also observed in some precursor CGs of bone marrow early eosinophils, indicating that giant granule formation was initiated during granule genesis. Almost all NCGs in late eosinophils were small granules and stained strongly with PA- TCH-SP in contrast to CGs. Most, but not all small granules were peroxidase-positive in eosinophil precursors, whereas the percentage of peroxidase-negative small granules increased in late eosinophils. This indicated the presence of at least two small granule populations. Morphometric studies indicated CHS selectively involved CGs and demonstrated that neither the average size nor numbers of NCGs were significantly different from normal eosinophils. Thus, these studies indicate that CHS selectively involves CGs, and demonstrate preservation of normal granule size and heterogeneity for NCGs in late eosinophils. These observations suggest that the underlying CHS pathophysiology does not involve all lysosomal subpopulations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Markovic
Chediak-Higashi-Like Granules in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Blood, November 1, 1998; 92(9): 3475 - 3477.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Borregaard and J. B. Cowland
Granules of the Human Neutrophilic Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte
Blood, May 15, 1997; 89(10): 3503 - 3521.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Scepek and M. Lindau
Exocytotic Competence and Intergranular Fusion in Cord Blood-Derived Eosinophils During Differentiation
Blood, January 15, 1997; 89(2): 510 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.