help button home button Am J Pathol Epitomics Buy 2 Antibodies Get 1 Free Special Offer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tabernero, D.
Right arrow Articles by Orfao, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tabernero, D.
Right arrow Articles by Orfao, A.

American Journal of Pathology, Vol 149, 153-161, Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Investigative Pathology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Incidence of chromosome numerical changes in multiple myeloma: fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using 15 chromosome- specific probes

D Tabernero, JF San Miguel, M Garcia-Sanz, L Najera, M Garcia-Isidoro, JA Perez- Simon, M Gonzalez, J Wiegant, AK Raap and A Orfao
Servicio General de Citometria, Universidad de Salamanca, Spain.

The presence of complex karotypes with frequent numerical and structural abnormalities has been reported in 20 to 50% of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. This variability is mainly due to the difficulty of conventional cytogenetics to obtain tumor metaphases representative of all possible neoplastic clones in MM. To gain insight into the real incidence of numerical chromosome changes in MM we have studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization technique 15 different human chromosomes, 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, X, and Y, in a series of 52 MM patients. In all cases, the DNA index assessed by a propidium iodide/CD38 double-staining technique with flow cytometry was simultaneously investigated for correlation, with fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Additional aims of this study were 1) to analyze whether the abnormalities detected were common to all plasma cells or were present in only a subpopulation of tumor cells, 2) to explore changes caused by disease progression, and 3) to establish possible associations among the altered chromosomes. Although the overall incidence of numerical abnormalities was 67%, this frequency increased to 80% in the 41 cases in which 7 or more chromosomes were analyzed. Trisomies were significantly more common than monosomies (84% versus 16%). Chromosomes 9 and 15 were the most frequently altered (52% and 48% of cases, respectively), with all of their abnormalities corresponding to trisomies. The most frequent losses involved chromosomes 13 (26%) and X in females (32%). Other common numerical changes corresponded to chromosomes 1 (39%), 11 (37%), 6 (32%), 3 (31%), 18 (29%), 7 (28%), and 17 (22%). By contrast, chromosomes 8(13%), 10(8%), and 12(3%) were rarely altered. DNA aneuploidy by flow cytometry was detected in 67% of patients, and a high degree of correlation was observed between the DNA index obtained by flow cytometry and the chromosome index derived from fluorescence in situ hybridization studies, calculated according to two mathematical formulas (coefficient of correlation of 0.82 and 0.91 when at least 7 or 12 chromosomes were considered, respectively). The frequency of numeric chromosome aberrations was higher in those patients with progressive disease and, interestingly, trisomy of chromosome 8 was exclusively detected in this latter group of patients. Our study shows that, with the exception of chromosome 8, a possible marker of clonal evolution, the numeric chromosome changes are present in nearly all malignant plasma cells (r > 0.84). Finally, frequent associations between chromosomal aberrations were observed (ie, chromosomes 6, 7, 9, and 17; 7 and 15; and 11 and 17). By excluding them, it was found that two triple combinations of chromosome-specific probes, chromosomes 1 and 9 together with either chromosome 13 or 15, could be a useful marker for detection of residual disease, as it permits the identification of most MM patients displaying numerical changes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
W. J. Chng, S. A. Van Wier, G. J. Ahmann, J. M. Winkler, S. M. Jalal, P. L. Bergsagel, M. Chesi, M. C. Trendle, M. M. Oken, E. Blood, et al.
A validated FISH trisomy index demonstrates the hyperdiploid and nonhyperdiploid dichotomy in MGUS
Blood, September 15, 2005; 106(6): 2156 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
J. M. Sayagues, M. D. Tabernero, A. Maillo, A. Espinosa, A. Rasillo, P. Diaz, J. Ciudad, A. Lopez, M. Merino, J. M. Goncalves, et al.
Intratumoral Patterns of Clonal Evolution in Meningiomas as Defined by Multicolor Interphase Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH): Is There a Relationship between Histopathologically Benign and Atypical/Anaplastic Lesions?
J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2004; 6(4): 316 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Specht, E. Haralambieva, K. Bink, M. Kremer, S. Mandl-Weber, I. Koch, R. Tomer, H. Hofler, E. Schuuring, P. M. Kluin, et al.
Different mechanisms of cyclin D1 overexpression in multiple myeloma revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative analysis of mRNA levels
Blood, August 15, 2004; 104(4): 1120 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Fonseca, B. Barlogie, R. Bataille, C. Bastard, P. L. Bergsagel, M. Chesi, F. E. Davies, J. Drach, P. R. Greipp, I. R. Kirsch, et al.
Genetics and Cytogenetics of Multiple Myeloma: A Workshop Report
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1546 - 1558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Maillo, A. Orfao, J. M. Sayagues, P. Diaz, J. A. Gomez-Moreta, M. Caballero, D. Santamarta, A. Santos-Briz, F. Morales, and M. D. Tabernero
New Classification Scheme for the Prognostic Stratification of Meningioma on the Basis of Chromosome 14 Abnormalities, Patient Age, and Tumor Histopathology
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2003; 21(17): 3285 - 3295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. V. Smadja, C. Bastard, C. Brigaudeau, D. Leroux, and C. Fruchart
Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma
Blood, October 1, 2001; 98(7): 2229 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Avva, R. L. Vanhemert, B. Barlogie, N. Munshi, and E. J. Angtuaco
CT-guided Biopsy of Focal Lesions in Patients with Multiple Myeloma May Reveal New and More Aggressive Cytogenetic Abnormalities
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2001; 22(4): 781 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. Pruneri, S. Fabris, L. Baldini, N. Carboni, S. Zagano, M. A. Colombi, G. Ciceri, L. Lombardi, M. Rocchi, R. Buffa, et al.
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cyclin D1 Shows Deregulated Expression in Multiple Myeloma with the t(11;14)
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2000; 156(5): 1505 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Zojer, R. Konigsberg, J. Ackermann, E. Fritz, S. Dallinger, E. Kromer, H. Kaufmann, L. Riedl, H. Gisslinger, S. Schreiber, et al.
Deletion of 13q14 remains an independent adverse prognostic variable in multiple myeloma despite its frequent detection by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization
Blood, March 15, 2000; 95(6): 1925 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Konigsberg, N. Zojer, J. Ackermann, E. Kromer, H. Kittler, E. Fritz, H. Kaufmann, T. Nosslinger, L. Riedl, H. Gisslinger, et al.
Predictive Role of Interphase Cytogenetics for Survival of Patients With Multiple Myeloma
J. Clin. Oncol., February 14, 2000; 18(4): 804 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. M. Pilarski, N. V. Giannakopoulos, A. J. Szczepek, A. M. Masellis, M. J. Mant, and A. R. Belch
In Multiple Myeloma, Circulating Hyperdiploid B Cells Have Clonotypic Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Rearrangements and May Mediate Spread of Disease
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2000; 6(2): 585 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. H.-L. Ng, A. Kan, Y.-F. Chung, I. H.-N. Wong, K.-W. Lo, N. W. R. Wickham, K. I.-K. Lei, and J. C.-K. Lee
Combined Morphological and Interphase Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Study in Multiple Myeloma of Chinese Patients
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 1999; 154(1): 15 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Drach, J. Ackermann, E. Fritz, E. Kromer, R. Schuster, H. Gisslinger, M. DeSantis, N. Zojer, M. Fiegl, S. Roka, et al.
Presence of a p53 Gene Deletion in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Predicts for Short Survival After Conventional-Dose Chemotherapy
Blood, August 1, 1998; 92(3): 802 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J.A. Perez-Simon, R. Garcia-Sanz, M.D. Tabernero, J. Almeida, M. Gonzalez, J. Fernandez-Calvo, M.J. Moro, J.M. Hernandez, J.F. S. Miguel, and A. Orfao
Prognostic Value of Numerical Chromosome Aberrations in Multiple Myeloma: A FISH Analysis of 15 Different Chromosomes
Blood, May 1, 1998; 91(9): 3366 - 3371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Hallek, P. Leif Bergsagel, and K. C. Anderson
Multiple Myeloma: Increasing Evidence for a Multistep Transformation Process
Blood, January 1, 1998; 91(1): 3 - 21.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.