| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Technical Advance |
From the Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Cancer Medicine ResearchUnit,*
St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds; and theProtein Analysis Lab,
Imperial Cancer ResearchFund, London, United Kingdom
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) is now well established as a tool for facilitating the enrichment of cells of interest from tissue sections, overcoming the problem of tissue heterogeneity. LCM has been used extensively in combination with analysis at the DNA and RNA levels, but only a small number of studies have employed LCM with subsequent protein analysis, albeit with promising results. This study focuses on the potential of LCM in combination with two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The effects of tissue section preparation and sample type were evaluated to fully determine the suitability of using LCM in global protein profiling. The effects of several histochemical stains (hematoxylin and eosin, methyl green and toluidine blue) and immunolabeling on subsequent two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were investigated. Quantitative analysis was performed to establish the extent of changes in the relative intensity of protein species and their reproducibility. All staining protocols tested were found to be compatible with protein analysis although there was variation in protein recovery and the quality of the protein profiles obtained. LCM of renal and cervix samples indicated that protein yield after dissection was acceptable, although the extent of enrichment and dissection time was tissue-dependent, which may preclude the use of this approach with some tissue types. These results indicate that LCM has potential as a tool in proteomic research.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. G. Janech, J. R. Raymond, and J. M. Arthur Proteomics in renal research Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): F501 - F512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. C. Meyers, D. W. Galbraith, T. Nelson, and V. Agrawal Methods for Transcriptional Profiling in Plants. Be Fruitful and Replicate Plant Physiology, June 1, 2004; 135(2): 637 - 652. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Li, Y. Hong, Y.-X. Tan, H. Zhou, J.-H. Ai, S.-J. Li, L. Zhang, Q.-C. Xia, J.-R. Wu, H.-Y. Wang, et al. Accurate Qualitative and Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Clinical Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Laser Capture Microdissection Coupled with Isotope-coded Affinity Tag and Two-dimensional Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2004; 3(4): 399 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. W. Purcell and J. J. Gorman Immunoproteomics: Mass Spectrometry-based Methods to Study the Targets of the Immune Response Mol. Cell. Proteomics, March 1, 2004; 3(3): 193 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. J. Zieziulewicz, D. W. Unfricht, N. Hadjout, M. A. Lynes, and D. A. Lawrence Shrinking the Biologic World--Nanobiotechnologies for Toxicology Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2003; 74(2): 235 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. F. Petricoin and L. A. Liotta Clinical Applications of Proteomics J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2476S - 2484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
