This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lin, T. Articles by Sacks, S. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lin, T. Articles by Sacks, S. H.

(American Journal of Pathology. 2006;168:1241-1248.)
© 2006 American Society for Investigative Pathology

Deficiency of C4 from Donor or Recipient Mouse Fails to Prevent Renal Allograft Rejection

Tao Lin^*, Wuding Zhou^*, Conrad A. Farrar^*, Roseanna E.G. Hargreaves^*, Neil S. Sheerin^* and Steven H. Sacks^*

From the Department of Nephrology and Transplantation,^* King’s College London School of Medicine at Guy’s, King’s College, and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, United Kingdom; and the Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China

Complement effector products generated in the transplanted kidney are known to mediate transplant rejection, but which of the three main activation pathways of complement trigger this response is unclear. Here we assessed the role of the classical and lectin pathways by studying the common component C4 in mouse kidney transplant rejection. We transplanted wild-type or C4-null H-2^b donor kidneys into H-2^k or H-2^d recipients, or vice-versa, to assess the roles of donor kidney and recipient expression of complement. Intragraft C4 gene expression rose substantially during rejection. However, we found no significant association between graft acceptance and the presence of C4 in either the donor kidney or recipient mouse. At the time of rejection, we found no significant differences in alloantibody response in the different groups. Tubular deposition of C3 to C9 occurred regardless of the absence or presence of C4 in either the donor or recipient mouse, indicating that C4 was dispensable for complement activation at this site. These data suggest that complement activation and renal allograft rejection are independent of the classical and lectin pathways in these models, implying that in the absence of these pathways the alternative pathway is the main trigger for complement-mediated rejection.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. H. Horne, J. M. Zimmerer, M. G. Fisher, K. E. Lunsford, G. Nadasdy, T. Nadasdy, N. van Rooijen, and G. L. Bumgardner Critical Role of Effector Macrophages in Mediating CD4-Dependent Alloimmune Injury of Transplanted Liver Parenchymal Cells J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1224 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Peng, K. Li, K. Anderson, C. A. Farrar, B. Lu, R. A. G. Smith, S. H. Sacks, and W. Zhou Local production and activation of complement up-regulates the allostimulatory function of dendritic cells through C3a-C3aR interaction Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 2452 - 2461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Roos, M. R. Daha, J. van Pelt, and S. P. Berger Mannose-binding lectin and the kidney Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3370 - 3377. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Matthijsen, D. Huugen, N. T. Hoebers, B. de Vries, C. J. Peutz-Kootstra, Y. Aratani, M. R. Daha, J. W. C. Tervaert, W. A. Buurman, and P. Heeringa Myeloperoxidase Is Critically Involved in the Induction of Organ Damage after Renal Ischemia Reperfusion Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 171(6): 1743 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]