help button home button Am J Pathol Angiogenesis Foundation
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published online as doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.081099 on July 23, 2009

Published online before print July 23, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajpath.2009.081099v1
175/2/772    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
(American Journal of Pathology. 2009;175:772-785.)
© 2009 American Society for Investigative Pathology
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081099

Rescue of Impaired Fracture Healing in COX-2–/– Mice via Activation of Prostaglandin E2 Receptor Subtype 4

Chao Xie*, Bojian Liang*, Ming Xue*, Angela S.P. Lin{dagger}, Alayna Loiselle*, Edward M. Schwarz*, Robert E. Guldberg{dagger}, Regis J. O'Keefe* and Xinping Zhang*

From the Center for Musculoskeletal Research,* University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; and the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,{dagger} Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

Although the essential role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 in fracture healing is known, the targeted genes and molecular pathways remain unclear. Using prostaglandin E2 receptor (EP)2 and EP4 agonists, we examined the effects of EP receptor activation in compensation for the lack of COX-2 during fracture healing. In a fracture-healing model, COX-2–/– mice showed delayed initiation and impaired endochondral bone repair, accompanied by a severe angiogenesis deficiency. The EP4 agonist markedly improved the impaired healing in COX-2–/– mice, as evidenced by restoration of bony callus formation on day 14, a near complete reversal of bone formation, and an approximately 70% improvement of angiogenesis in the COX-2–/– callus. In comparison, the EP2 agonist only marginally enhanced bone formation in COX-2–/– mice. To determine the differential roles of EP2 and EP4 receptors on COX-2-mediated fracture repair, the effects of selective EP agonists on chondrogenesis were examined in E11.5 long-term limb bud micromass cultures. Only the EP4 agonist significantly increased cartilage nodule formation similar to that observed during prostaglandin E2 treatment. The prostaglandin E2/EP4 agonist also stimulated MMP-9 expression in bone marrow stromal cell cultures. The EP4 agonist further restored the reduction of MMP-9 expression in the COX-2–/– fracture callus. Taken together, our studies demonstrate that EP2 and EP4 have differential functions during endochondral bone repair. Activation of EP4, but not EP2 rescued impaired bone fracture healing in COX-2–/– mice.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology.