| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Levels in Liver and Blood Correlate Better than Hepatocyte Growth Factor with Hepatocyte Proliferation during Liver Regeneration
From the First Department of Internal Medicine,*
Faculty
of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, and Third
Department of Internal Medicine,
Saitama
Medical School, Iruma-gun, Saitama, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TGF
) and hepatocyte growth
factor (HGF) are mitogens for hepatocytes in vitro and
in vivo, produced by hepatocytes or nonparenchymal
cells such as stellate cells in the liver. It is still uncertain
whether TGF
and HGF are essential for liver regeneration. To assess
the role of these growth factors in liver regeneration, their
circulating and hepatic levels were studied in various rat models of
liver regeneration. Hepatic and plasma HGF levels were increased with
increased number of mitotic hepatocytes in rats after partial
hepatectomy or carbon tetrachloride intoxication. However,
hepatic HGF levels were decreased despite an increased number of
mitotic hepatocytes and increased or unchanged plasma HGF levels in
rats given phenobarbital and in rats after dimethylnitrosamine
intoxication, which can induce hepatic necrosis after apoptosis
of hepatic stellate cells. In contrast, hepatic and serum
TGF
levels were increased in all of the models. In sham-operated
rats with no increased number of mitotic hepatocytes, hepatic
and circulating levels of HGF were increased, whereas those
levels of TGF
were unchanged. The results indicate that TGF
levels in liver and blood more closely correlate with hepatocyte
mitogenesis than HGF levels.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many mitogens for hepatocytes have been found since hepatocytes in
primary culture were utilized to detect and characterize contributing
factors.1-3
Transforming growth factor
(TGF
) and
hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) can stimulate hepatocyte proliferation
in vivo as well as in vitro.4-9
TGF
exerts its action by binding to the TGF
/epidermal growth
factor (EGF) receptor on the cell surface. In the liver, hepatocytes
express both TGF
mRNA and TGF
/EGF receptor
mRNA,10-16
suggesting that TGF
can stimulate hepatocyte
proliferation in an autocrine manner.1
HGF is produced by
nonparenchymal cells, principally by hepatic stellate cells, in the
liver, and the c-met proto-oncogene product identified as
its receptor is present in hepatocytes.17-24
Thus, HGF is
postulated to stimulate hepatocyte proliferation in a paracrine manner
in the liver.3
TGF
and HGF have been reported to
increase in the liver in several experimental models of liver
regeneration,13,25-27
and also in the circulation of
patients after partial hepatectomy and patients with acute
hepatitis.28-31
These findings suggest that TGF
and HGF
can contribute to liver regeneration.3
Recently, it was
reported that there was no significant difference in hepatocyte
proliferation after partial hepatectomy between TGF
knockout mice
and wild-type mice.32
Also, HGF has been shown to increase
resulting from its active production in inflammatory cells as well as
hepatic stellate cells in rats and human.18,33
Systemic and
hepatic inflammation can occur even in the process of liver
regeneration after resection.30,34
In fact, serum HGF
levels in patients after partial hepatectomy are more closely related
to the degree of systemic and hepatic inflammation than to the degree
of liver regeneration.30
Liver regeneration occurs
generally after partial hepatectomy, acute hepatic injury, or
small-for-size liver transplantation.1-3,35
The levels of
essential factors for liver regeneration might increase in the liver or
circulation, similarly reflecting the extent of liver regeneration
after these events.
The aim of this study is to determine whether TGF
and HGF levels in
liver and blood correlate with hepatocyte proliferation. In different
rat models of liver regeneration, we serially measured circulating
levels as well as hepatic levels of both factors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sep-Pak C18 minicolumns were obtained from Waters Chromatography Division (Millipore Corp., Milford, MA). Twenty percent neutral buffered formalin solution was purchased from Muto Pure Chemicals Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) and phenylmethyl-sulfonyl fluoride from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). HGF enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was a product of the Institute of Immunology (Tokyo, Japan).36 Other reagents were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan).
Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley rats ages 5 to 6 weeks were obtained from Japan SLC (Shizuoka, Japan). They were housed in cages at 22 ± 2°C under a 12-hour light-dark cycle and fed a commercial diet and water ad libitum. All animal study protocols conformed to the guidelines of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo for humane care.
Animal Experiments
The rats were subjected to either of the following: an operation of two-thirds resection of the liver under diethyl ether anesthesia, a single subcutaneous injection of 3.0 ml/kg body weight of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) as a 20% solution in olive oil, a single intraperitoneal injection of 35 mg/kg body weight of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) as a 3.5% solution in saline, or oral administration of phenobarbital sodium ad libitum at a concentration of 0.10% in the drinking water. In sham-operated rats, the abdomen was cut open under similar anesthesia, and the liver was briefly exposed outside the peritoneal cavity. Rats given water were used as controls for phenobarbital-treated rats.
The rats were serially anesthetized with diethyl ether. Blood was
collected through the inferior vena cava with an empty plastic syringe
and a plastic syringe containing 3.1% sodium citrate solution (1:10
v/v) to prepare serum and plasma, respectively. The liver was perfused
with 25 ml of saline at 37°C through the portal vein after near-total
exsanguination, and excised. A portion of the liver was immersed in
20% neutral buffered formalin solution for histological examination.
The remaining liver was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
-80°C until use for TGF
and HGF assays.
Assay for TGF
in the Liver and Serum
Liver extracts were prepared by homogenizing 400 mg liver tissue
in 1.8 ml of 0.1 mol/L phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) using a
Tenbrock tissue grinder as previously reported.37
The
supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 100,000 x
g for 60 minutes at 4°C. One milliliter of the
supernatants or sera was applied to Sep-Pak C18
minicolumns.38,39
The columns were washed with 20 ml
distilled water, and the trapped materials were eluted with 40%
acetonitrile (3 ml). The column eluates were lyophilized, redissolved
in 0.2 ml of 10 mmol/L phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2), and used for
TGF
ELISA as previously reported.28,29
Assay for HGF in the Liver and Plasma
Liver extracts were prepared according to the protocol from the manufacturer of the HGF ELISA kit.36 Briefly, liver tissues were homogenized in 4 vol/g of a buffer composed of 20 mmol/L Tris[hydroxymethyl]aminomethane-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 0.1% polyoxyethylenesorbitan mono-oleate. The homogenates were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 60 minutes at 4°C, and the resultant supernatants were collected. These supernatants and the plasma were applied to HGF ELISA.36
Assay for Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels
Serum ALT levels were measured by modified Reitman-Framkel method using a commercial kit.40
Histological Examination
Liver specimens fixed in formalin were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The mitotic index of hepatocytes was determined by counting more than 3000 hepatocytes in each liver specimen.7
Statistical Analyses
The differences between unpaired two samples were defined as significant when P values by both Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were less than 0.05. Spearman's correlation test was used for analysis of correlations.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and HGF Levels after Partial Hepatectomy and Sham Operation
in Rats
Mean (±SEM) hepatic and circulating levels of TGF
in five
normal rats were 9.8 ± 1.2 ng/g liver and 5.3 ± 0.85 ng/ml,
respectively, and those of HGF were 168 ± 17.2 ng/g liver and
0.14 ± 0.013 ng/ml, respectively. As shown in Figure 1
, the mitotic index of hepatocytes was
unchanged until 18 hours after partial hepatectomy, but increased to
the maximal level at 24 hours. It decreased to the preoperative level
at 120 hours, with a smaller peak at 72 hours. Hepatic and serum TGF
levels were significantly increased after 12 hours compared with the
preoperative levels, reached the maximum at 24 hours, and thereafter
changed similarly to the mitotic index of hepatocytes. Hepatic and
plasma HGF levels were significantly increased at 6 hours compared with
the preoperative levels, reached the maximum around 18 hours, and
returned to the preoperative level at 48 hours.
|
levels showed no significant changes. However, hepatic and
plasma HGF levels were significantly increased between 6 and 18 hours
compared with the preoperative levels (Figure 2)
|
and HGF Levels after Intoxication with CCl4 or
DMN in Rats
As shown in Figure 3
, serum ALT
levels were increased with a peak on day 1 after intoxication with
CCl4, and the mitotic index of hepatocytes and hepatic and
serum TGF
levels peaked on day 3. Hepatic and plasma HGF levels
changed similarly to serum ALT levels. In the rats on days 0.5, 1, and
2, plasma HGF levels were correlated with serum ALT levels as shown in
Figure 4
(r =
0.81; P < 0.01).
|
|
levels peaked
on day 3. In contrast, hepatic HGF levels were significantly decreased
compared with the basal level, but plasma HGF levels were unchanged.
|
and HGF Levels during Phenobarbital Administration in Rats
As shown in Figure 6
, the mitotic
index of hepatocytes was gradually increased and peaked on day 7, with
liver weights increasing significantly after 12 hours compared with the
controls. The mitotic index decreased thereafter and returned to the
basal level on day 14. Hepatic and serum TGF
levels changed
similarly to the mitotic index. Plasma HGF levels were increased,
reached the maximum on day 1, and returned to the basal level on day 5.
In contrast, hepatic HGF levels were significantly decreased from day 1
until day 14 compared with the basal level.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
were closely associated with liver regeneration. However, those
levels of HGF were not necessarily related to it. We used four different rat models of liver regeneration. Partial hepatectomy induces compensatory hyperplasia of the remaining liver with minimal necrosis.1 Intoxication with CCl4 also induces compensatory hepatic hyperplasia after liver necrosis due to direct damage to hepatocytes.41 Similar hepatic hyperplasia after liver necrosis is also produced by intoxication with DMN, but the mechanism of development of liver necrosis is much different from that by CCl4 intoxication. In this model, liver necrosis occurs mainly as a result of microcirculatory disturbance due to sinusoidal fibrin deposition caused by endothelial cell destruction after apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells, which are the major HGF-producing cells in the liver.41,42 Phenobarbital administration can induce augmentative hyperplasia of the liver without any damage to parenchymal and nonparenchymal cells in the liver.43
Both hepatic and serum TGF
levels were increased in close
association with the numbers of mitotic hepatocytes irrespective of the
type of liver regeneration (Figures 1, 3, 5, and 6)
. Sham operation
caused no changes in hepatic and serum TGF
levels (Figure 2)
. These
results were in line with our previous observations in
patients28,39
and reports in rats showing increased hepatic
TGF
mRNA levels after partial hepatectomy and CCl4
intoxication.1,14,25,44
TGF
produced by hepatocytes in
the liver may be an essential factor for liver regeneration.
Recently, Russell et al found no difference in hepatocyte proliferation
after partial hepatectomy between TGF
knockout mice and wild-type
mice.32
There are many ligands for the TGF
/EGF receptor,
including EGF which is abundantly produced by salivary glands in
mice.1,15
Loss of TGF
might be masked as a result of
opportunistic compensation by one such ligand in TGF
knockout mice,
as was discussed in the report.32
Indeed, targeting of a
gene can increase the expression of other functionally related
proteins.45
Investigation with TGF
/EGF receptor knockout
mice would be a way to clarify this controversy.
Hepatic and plasma HGF levels were increased in rats after partial
hepatectomy and CCl4 intoxication (Figures 1 and 3)
. In
both models, the increase of hepatic HGF mRNA levels has also been
reported.3,17,26,27,46,47
However, such significant
increases of hepatic and plasma HGF levels were also found after sham
operation, with no increase in number of mitotic hepatocytes (Figure 2)
. Recently, it was reported that hepatic HGF mRNA levels were
increased after sham operation, as well as after partial hepatectomy in
rats.47,48
In addition, plasma HGF levels were positively
correlated with serum ALT levels in rats treated with CCl4
(Figure 4)
. These results are comparable with our previous finding in
patients that serum HGF levels were increased in association with
hepatic necrosis and systemic inflammation.30,31
It can be
assumed that HGF production is stimulated in response to an
inflammatory reaction after a surgical procedure or hepatic injury.
This assumption may be supported by the recent report that
preinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 can regulate HGF
production.49
Furthermore, the number of mitotic
hepatocytes was increased despite decreased hepatic HGF levels after
intoxication with DMN and during phenobarbital administration in rats
(Figures 5 and 6)
. Considering that stellate cells are major
HGF-producing cells in the liver,23
such a decrease with
unchanged plasma HGF levels in DMN-intoxicated rats is likely to result
from apoptosis of stellate cells caused by DMN.41,42
The
decrease in hepatic HGF levels during phenobarbital administration was
accompanied by transiently increased plasma HGF levels (Figure 6)
.
These data are comparable with reported observations that plasma HGF
levels were increased, even with no increase of hepatic HGF mRNA levels
in the model of augmentative hepatic hyperplasia.43,50,51
The reason for such an increase should be investigated, especially in
relation to reduced uptake of HGF.
There were some differences in the duration and the timing of the
increase in TGF
and HGF levels in rats after partial hepatectomy
between our results and reported observations.52,53
The
differences might arise from assay systems used. Russell et al reported
that the increase of hepatic TGF
levels after partial hepatectomy in
rats continued longer than in rats in the present study.52
The TGF
ELISA we used can measure exclusively mature
TGF
,28,29,38,39
whereas their radioimmunoassay seems to
detect both the mature TGF
and its precursors. They found that
mature TGF
was increased in regenerating liver but not in the liver
of sham-operated rats by gel chromatography, suggesting that the
increase of mature TGF
is related to liver regeneration. Lindroos et
al showed two peaks of plasma HGF levels as early as 2 and 6 hours
after operation, and this elevation continued for 72
hours,53
whereas the levels in the present study reached
the maximum around 18 hours and returned to the preoperative levels at
48 hours (Figure 1)
. In the determination of HGF, we used sandwich
ELISA composed of a polyclonal antibody and a monoclonal antibody
specific for the heavy chain of HGF.36
In contrast, only
one polyclonal antibody was utilized in their assay system. There are
many forms of HGF.12,39,54
Furthermore, HGF-like protein, a
novel protein synthesized by hepatocytes, contains the same structural
domains as HGF.55
The ELISA we have used might detect a
smaller number of HGF forms and HGF-like protein compared with other
assays.
From our study, both TGF
and HGF seemed not to initiate liver
regeneration, because the timing of their increases in the liver and
circulation occurred too late to act as initiation factors. Recently,
tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 have been reported to initiate
liver regeneration.56,57
The relation of TGF
and HGF to
tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 should be investigated in the
future.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication June 3, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
overexpression in transgenic mice induces liver neoplasia and abnormal development of the mammary gland and pancreas. Cell 1990, 61:1137-1146[Medline]
in adult rat liver. Hepatology 1994, 19:1521-1527[Medline]
. Cell 1988, 54:593-595[Medline]
may be a physiological regulator of liver regeneration by means of an autocrine mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989, 86:1558-1562
expression during liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy and toxic injury, and potential interactions between transforming growth factor-
and hepatocyte growth factor. Hepatology 1993, 18:1422-1431[Medline]
in patients after partial hepatectomy as determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Hepatology 1993, 18:304-308[Medline]
levels. Hepatology 1996, 23:253-257[Medline]
-targeted mice. Mol Carcinog 1996, 15:183-189[Medline]
(TGF
) based upon conformational modification by antibody binding. J Immunol Methods 1990, 128:27-37[Medline]
in regenerating liver and during hepatic differentiation. Mol Carcinog 1992, 5:25-31[Medline]
on liver cell proliferation induced in rats by lead nitrate. Lab Invest 1994, 71:35-41[Medline]
(TGF
) concentrations increase in regenerating rat liver: evidence for a delayed accumulation of murine TGF
. Endocrinology 1993, 133:1731-1738[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. M. Mehendale Tissue Repair: An Important Determinant of Final Outcome of Toxicant-Induced Injury Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2005; 33(1): 41 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. M. Apte, P. B. Limaye, D. Desaiah, T. J. Bucci, A. Warbritton, and H. M. Mehendale Mechanisms of Increased Liver Tissue Repair and Survival in Diet-Restricted Rats Treated with Equitoxic Doses of Thioacetamide Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2003; 72(2): 272 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. M. Apte, P. B. Limaye, S. K. Ramaiah, V. S. Vaidya, T. J. Bucci, A. Warbritton, and H. M. Mehendale Upregulated Promitogenic Signaling via Cytokines and Growth Factors: Potential Mechanism of Robust Liver Tissue Repair in Calorie-Restricted Rats upon Toxic Challenge Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2002; 69(2): 448 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Madden, M. J. Finegold, and B. L. Slagle Hepatitis B Virus X Protein Acts as a Tumor Promoter in Development of Diethylnitrosamine-Induced Preneoplastic Lesions J. Virol., April 15, 2001; 75(8): 3851 - 3858. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tomiya, I. Ogata, M. Yamaoka, M. Yanase, Y. Inoue, and K. Fujiwara The Mitogenic Activity of Hepatocyte Growth Factor on Rat Hepatocytes Is Dependent upon Endogenous Transforming Growth Factor-{alpha} Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2000; 157(5): 1693 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Weglarz and E. P. Sandgren Timing of hepatocyte entry into DNA synthesis after partial hepatectomy is cell autonomous PNAS, October 23, 2000; (2000) 220430497. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Weglarz and E. P. Sandgren Timing of hepatocyte entry into DNA synthesis after partial hepatectomy is cell autonomous PNAS, November 7, 2000; 97(23): 12595 - 12600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |