| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |

From the Departments of Clinical Pathology*
and
Laboratory Medicine,
University of Vienna,
Vienna, Austria, and the Department of
Pathology,
University of Würzburg,
Würzburg, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß+CD3+CD8+CD5low
and include an ~15% fraction of CD56+ cells that could
be the cells of origin for CD56+ intestinal T-cell lymphoma
(ITL). To test this hypothesis, 70 cases diagnosed as ITL were
immunophenotyped, and 15 CD56+ cases (21%) were
identified. The majority of the CD56+ lymphomas was of
monomorphic small to medium-sized histology, shared the common
phenotype
ßF1±CD3
/cyt+CD8+CD4-CD5-CD57-TIA-1+
and had clonally rearranged TCR
-chain genes. In contrast,
the CD56- lymphomas were mainly composed of pleomorphic
medium and large cells or had a morphology most consistent with
anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and were mostly CD8-. These
findings suggest that the majority of CD56+ intestinal
lymphomas are morphologically and phenotypically distinct T-cell
lymphomas most likely derived from activated cytotoxic
CD56+CD8+ IELs. Some overlapping histological
and clinical features between CD56+ and CD56-
ITLs indicate that the former belong to the clinicopathological entity
of ITL. The consistent expression of cytotoxic-granule-associated
proteins introduces ITL (both CD56+ and CD56-)
into the growing family of usually aggressive extranodal lymphomas of
cytotoxic T-cell and NK-cell derivation. In contrast to putative
NK-cell lymphoma of the sinonasal region, intestinal NK-cell
lymphoma seems to be very rare.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The expression of the natural killer (NK) cell marker CD56 has been reported to occur in NK-cell lymphomas/leukemias and a small group of peripheral T-cell lymphomas9-11 but has not been studied extensively on primary intestinal non-B-cell lymphomas. The present study on 70 cases diagnosed as ITL identified 15 CD56+ lymphomas (21%) and showed that the majority of these neoplasms are not only immunophenotypically distinct peripheral T-cell lymphomas but do also share characteristic histological features.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 70 cases diagnosed as ITL were retrieved from the files of the Department of Clinical Pathology, General Hospital Vienna (n = 42) and from the Department of Pathology, University of Würzburg (n = 28). From our previously published series of 27 cases,8 22 ITLs were included in this study, the remaining 5 cases were excluded because only endoscopic biopsies were available (n = 2) or too little tissue was left in the blocks (n = 3). Surgical resection specimens were available in all cases for detailed histopathological and immunophenotypical analyses. Frozen tissue was available in 13 cases.
Histological Definition of Enteropathy
The intestinal mucosa uninvolved by lymphoma was evaluated for the
presence of enteropathy with special emphasis on an increase in
normal-appearing IELs. Although in patients with untreated CD, an
increase in IELs is usually accompanied by architectural changes of the
mucosa, such as crypt hypertrophy and/or variable degrees of villous
atrophy, the increase in IELs is of special importance as this feature
represents the earliest morphological finding and is observed in
virtually all patients, including subjects with latent CD and even in
family relatives.12
In normal controls, IELs are more
frequent in jejunum than in ileum (20 ± 5 versus
9 ± 2 per 100 enterocytes).13
For the purpose of this
study, enteropathy was defined solely by an increase of IELs (
40/100
enterocytes in jejunal and
20/100 enterocytes in ileal specimens)
because all of the specimens that showed this feature had also at least
crypt hypertrophy and/or mild villous atrophy. Conversely, absence of
enteropathy was defined by IEL counts within the normal range, which
was consistently found in a structurally normal mucosa.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed in all 70 cases on
formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Immunostaining was
done using the polyclonal antibody anti-CD3 recognizing the cytoplasmic
CD3-
chain (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark; 1:400), and the monoclonal
antibodies L26 (CD20, Dako; 1:200), ßF1 (T-Cell Sciences, Woburn, MA;
1:10), CD4 (Novocastra, Newcastle, UK; 1:10), CD5 (Novocastra; 1:20),
CD8 (Dako; 1:30), TIA-1 (Coulter, Hialeah, FL; 1:800), CD56 (Sanbio,
Uden, The Netherlands; 1:200), CD57 (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA;
1:10), CD30 (Dako; 1:80), and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA)
(Dako; 1:100). The monoclonal antibody granzyme B-4 (GB-4, 1:50) was
generously provided by Dr. J.A. Kummer, Department of Pathology, Free
University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Pretreatment for
unmasking of antigens was done either by digestion with 0.05%
preheated protease (type XXIV, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in
Tris-buffered saline for 5 minutes at 37°C (for ßF1 and CD3), or by
microwaving in citrate buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 6.0) twice for 5 minutes
each at 600 W (GB-4, TIA-1, CD30, and EMA) or by autoclaving at 1 bar
for 20 minutes, followed by cooling down for 40 minutes (for CD4, CD5,
CD8, CD56, and ALK1). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation
in 1% H2O2 in Tris-buffered saline or by
incubation in a solution containing glucose (50 mg/ml) and glucose
oxidase (Sigma). Application of ßF1, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, and ALK1 was
followed by incubation with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (for CD3)
or horse anti-mouse IgG (for ßF1, CD4, CD5, CD8, and ALK1) as the
secondary antibody and then by peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin
(Super Sensitive HRP Label, Biogenex, San Ramon, CA). Staining was
developed using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole as the chromogen (Sigma) in
the presence of H2O2. For the remaining
antibodies, biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG (1:200) was used as the
secondary antibody followed by Vectastain Elite ABC reagent (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine as a chromogen
(Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) in the presence of
H2O2. On frozen sections, a perforin antibody
(Endogen, Woburn, MA; 1:50) supplemented the antibody panel used in the
previous study.8
Nonspecific reactivity was tested by
omission of the primary antibodies.
To assess the accuracy of immunostaining, all reactions were first evaluated for internal positive controls, such as small reactive lymphoid cells (for L26, ßF1, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, GB-4, TIA-1, CD56, and CD57), histiocytes (for CD4), plasma cells (for Ber-H2 and EMA), epithelial cells (for EMA), or nerve fibers (for CD56). Staining of tumor cells was scored: +, >50% positive; ±, 20 to 50% positive; -, <20% positive; +i, individual large cells positive. The latter score was used for GB-4, Ber-H2, and EMA staining only. As an additional measure of quality control, the results obtained by frozen section immunophenotyping on 13 cases, 8 of which have been reported,8 were compared with those on paraffin sections.
EBER in Situ Hybridization
All of the 70 cases were studied for the presence of EBV early RNA transcripts (EBERs). Fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotides complementary to EBER-1/2 were used according to the instructions of the manufacturer (PNA ISH detection kit, Dako) under RNAse-free conditions.
T-Cell Clonality Analyses by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
For the detection of T-cell clonality, a PCR technique was used to
amplify rearranged TCR
-chain gene sequences. Genomic DNA was
extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue by proteinase K
digestion without detergents or EDTA according to Frank and
co-workers.14
DNA was amplified in 50-µl reaction volumes
essentially as described15
with the following
modifications: the primer for JGT4 was excluded from the multiplex
primer mix; the primer concentrations were 10 pmol for primers V3, V4,
V8, V9, V10, and V11, 15 pmol for JGT3, 20 pmol for V2 and V5, and 25
pmol for JGT12; the concentration of MgCl2 was 2.5 mmol/L,
and 1.5 U of Ampli Taq Gold polymerase (Perkin Elmer Cetus,
Norwalk, CT) was used per reaction. Forty-five cycles were at 94°C
for 1 minute, 62°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute with a
terminal extension at 72°C for 20 minutes followed by 100°C for 6
minutes and 65°C for 3 minutes to support heteroduplex formation. PCR
products were separated on precast 6% polyacrylamide gels (Novex, San
Diego, CA). Simultaneously amplified DNA from a nodal peripheral T-cell
lymphoma, unspecified, served as a positive control. A DNA mixture
obtained from peripheral blood lymphocytes from 10 healthy donors was
used as a polyclonal control.
Clinical Data
Medical records were reviewed for the patients' history, type, duration of symptoms at initial presentation, and type of treatment. Follow-up was obtained via clinical records, attending physicians, or autopsy files. Stages of disease were assigned according to an adaptation of the Ann Arbor staging system for extranodal lymphomas and its modification by Musshoff, respectively.16
Statistical Analyses
Differences between CD56+ and CD56- cases were analyzed using Fisher's two-tailed exact test. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison was based on the log-rank test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clonality Analyses of CD56+
Intestinal Lymphomas
Among 70 intestinal lymphomas, which have been signed out as
ITL, 15 lymphomas expressed CD56 (Table 1)
. The common phenotype of the
CD56+ lymphomas was ßF1± (5/15),
CD3
/cyt+ (13/15), CD8+ (12/15),
CD4- (15/15), CD5- (14/15),
CD57- (15/15), CD30- (15/15),
EMA- (15/15). Immunostaining for CD56 and CD8 in a
representative case (case 13) is shown in Figure 1, A and B
, respectively. The majority of
CD56+ lymphomas expressed the cytotoxic-granule-associated
proteins TIA-1 (14/15; Figure 1C
) and GB-4 (10/15), suggestive of
cytotoxic-T-cell or NK-cell derivation. Immunohistochemistry on frozen
sections in four cases showed no evidence of TCR-
phenotype
(0/3), and in one case each, expression of perforin and CD103 (HML-1)
was noted (Table 2)
. To further clarify
the cellular origin of the CD56+ lymphomas, TCR
-chain
gene rearrangement studies were done by multiplex PCR. Molecular
evidence of clonally expanded T-cell populations was found in 12 of 15
cases (Figure 2)
. No definite lineage
assignment could be achieved in the three remaining lymphomas (cases 2,
8, and 10); although a T-cell origin in cases 2 and 8 could not be
excluded, they more likely represented true NK-cell neoplasms; the
cellular origin in case 10
(CD56+TIA-1-CD34-,
myeloperoxidase-) was considered undetermined. These
results suggest that the vast majority of CD56+ intestinal
lymphomas are T-cell lymphomas.
|
|
|
|
Eleven of the fifteen CD56+ lymphomas showed
strikingly uniform morphological features. At low-power magnification
(not shown), these 11 lymphomas were characterized by the monotonous
appearance of densely packed cells almost without any recognizable
stroma compo-nents; at medium and high power, the monotonous character
prevailed, because most of the rather monomorphic medium-sized cells
(n = 8) or small to medium-sized cells
(n = 3) contained only slightly irregular nuclei
with small nucleoli and moderately wide, pale or sometimes clear
cytoplasm (Figure 1D)
. Conspicuous variation in cell size within a
given tumor were not seen, and inflammatory cells, fibrosis, and
necrotic changes were present in two cases only.
The remaining four CD56+ lymphomas were composed either of pleomorphic medium and large cells (n = 2), immunoblasts (n = 1), or pleomorphic small cells (n = 1).
Histopathology and Phenotype of 55 CD56- Intestinal Lymphomas
The majority of the 55 CD56- lymphomas were composed of pleomorphic medium and large cells or had a morphology most consistent with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL). These tumors were frequently associated with fibrosis and admixed inflammatory cells. Prominent lymphoma-associated eosinophilia, as described by Shepherd et al,17 was noted in nine cases. Four lymphomas showed the morphology of the monomorphic medium cell type described above and were thus indistinguishable from their CD56+ counterpart.
The immunohistochemical findings on paraffin and frozen sections are
shown in Tables 1 and 2
, respectively. Only 2 of the 55 lymphomas were
negative for both TIA-1 and GB-4; 27 expressed CD30, and 11 stained for
EMA.
Detection of EBER Transcripts in CD56+ and CD56- Lymphomas
Six of the seventy cases showed nuclear EBER reactivity. However, a broad range of reactivity from <5% to >80% was noticed. In both immunophenotypic groups, one case each exhibited EBER positivity in >80% of the tumor cells throughout the lymphomatous infiltrate. Clustered EBER+ tumor cells were detected in three other cases; in a CD56- lymphoma, 50% of the tumor population was EBER+, and 10% to 15% reactivity was detected each in a CD56+ and a CD56- lymphoma. The remaining case of a CD56+ lymphoma contained <5% scattered small EBER+ cells, which did not allow distinction between tumor cells or reactive lymphocytes.
Distinguishing Features of CD56+ versus CD56- Intestinal Lymphomas
Distinguishing features of the two immunophenotypic groups are
summarized and compared in Table 3
. In
contrast to the CD56- cases, the CD56+
lymphomas were significantly more often positive for CD8 (80%
versus 19%; P < 0.001) but constantly
negative for CD30 and EMA. Morphologically, the CD56+
lymphomas were significantly more often of monomorphic small to
medium-sized histology (73% versus 7%; P
< 0.001), but significantly less often associated with histologically
defined enteropathy (53% versus 85%; P =
0.03).
|
Clinical characteristics of the CD56+ and
CD56- patients are summarized and compared in Table 3
. Age
and sex distributions were almost identical in both groups. Four of the
fifteen patients with CD56+ lymphoma had diarrhea for 1
week, 1 month, 14 months, and 15 months, respectively. None of the
patients was known to have CD, although specific clinical and
serological testing has been done only in the two patients with
long-lasting diarrhea. In contrast, 16 of 50 patients with
CD56- lymphoma had histories of CD ranging from 1 to 25
years (median, 6 years). This difference was statistically significant
(0% versus 32%; P = 0.014). The
CD56+ group had a higher incidence of free intestinal
perforation at initial presentation. In both groups, the jejunum
(either alone or in combination with ileal involvement) was the most
common site of histologically documented lymphoma involvement, but
CD56+ lymphomas were more often confined to the ileum. The
two immunophenotypic groups were similar with regard to stage at
initial presentation, having both stage I and II in ~75% of the
cases. Seventy-three per cent of patients with CD56+
lymphoma and 70% of patients with CD56- lymphoma died
within 6 months. The majority of them did not receive chemotherapy or
did not finish the complete course. Two patients with CD56+
lymphoma are alive, one patient with disease at 7 months and another
disease-free at 85 months. One patient died of an unrelated cause at 86
months. Among 33 patients with CD56- lymphoma, 5 patients
are alive, 1 with disease at 8 months and 4 who had all achieved
complete remission after multiagent chemotherapy at 51, 56, 66, and 96
months, respectively. Overall median survival was 3 months for both
groups.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/cyt+CD56+,
frequent absence of other T-lineage markers, and lack of clonal TCR
gene rearrangement in most cases.21
These tumors are
currently referred to as nasal NK/T-cell lymphomas,22
but
there is growing evidence that they represent true NK-cell
lymphomas.23-26
The term nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma
recognizes that there are lymphomas arising in a variety of extranodal
sites that appear to be identical to nasal NK/T-cell
lymphomas.22
NK-like T cells are surface CD3+, express NK-cell antigens,
such as CD56, and rearrange their TCR, which distinguishes them from
true NK cells. 18,27 The extremely rare NK-like
T-cell-derived lymphomas include the clinicopathological entity of
hepatosplenic 
T-cell lymphoma28
and may,
furthermore, arise at a variety of other extranodal sites among which
the intestine could play an important role.10,20,29,30
Normal human jejunal IELs are mainly
TCR
ß+CD3+CD8+CD5low,
and in situ analyses have shown lack of proteins carrying
out cell-mediated cytolysis, such as granzyme B, perforin, and Fas
ligand, indicating that IELs are resting cytotoxic T
cells.31,32
Upon activation, however, expression of
granzyme B and Fas ligand is rapidly up-regulated.32-34
Similar to the human liver,35
jejunal IELs are also
enriched for CD56+ T cells, constituting ~15% of freshly
isolated TCR-
ß+ IELs, which could be the cells of
origin for CD56+ ITLs.13
To test this
hypothesis, seventy ITLs were studied for CD56 expression, and 15
CD56+ cases were identified. The common antigen profile in
the majority of these lymphomas was
ßF1±CD3
/cyt+CD8+CD4-CD5-CD56+,
which is most consistent with NK-like T cells, and clonal TCR-
gene
rearrangement provided further evidence for T-cell derivation. Based on
previous studies suggesting that ITLs arise from
ß-bearing T
cells2,4,8,36
and on the fact that only two well documented
intestinal 
T-cell lymphomas (both CD56-) have been
reported,37
it is conceivable that the vast majority of
CD56+ ITLs are also of
ß T-cell origin. Nevertheless,
a considerable proportion of putative
ß T-cell-derived ITLs in
this and other reports did not stain for ßF1, probably due to the
insensitivity of the antibody. Alternatively, lack of ßF1 reactivity
could be a result of incomplete or nonproductive rearrangement of the
ß-chain,4
or the tumor cells have indeed down-regulated
their surface TCR, which has been shown in clonally expanded T-cell
populations upon stimulation.38,39
Three CD56+ lymphomas lacking detectable clonal
TCR-
gene rearrangements were probably true NK-cell lymphomas (cases
2 and 8) or of undetermined lineage (case 10), indicating that, in
contrast to the sinonasal region, primary small-intestinal NK-cell
lymphomas are exceptionally rare.11,19,40
This finding is
not unexpected as in the normal small intestine NK cells are virtually
absent intraepithelially and rarely present in the lamina
propria.13,41
Expression of the activation-dependent cytotoxic molecules granzyme B and perforin, as well as reactivity for TIA-1, a granule-associated protein expressed by non-activated and activated NK cells and cytotoxic T cells, was demonstrated in this and previous studies, suggesting that ITLs are derived from activated cytotoxic T cells.42-45
Recent studies on the presence of EBV in ITLs using sensitive in situ hybridization techniques have found a very low frequency of EBV+ European cases in contrast to a high incidence in cases of Mexican origin.46-48 As an etiological role of EBV could be suggested only in those cases in which most if not all tumor cells are EBER+,49 only 2 of our 70 cases (one CD56+) are clearly EBV associated. These data indicate that the virus is not implicated in the pathogenesis of European ITLs.
Eleven of the fifteen CD56+ lymphomas showed a strikingly similar histology characterized by densely packed monomorphic small to medium-sized cells, indicating a strong correlation between phenotype and morphology. Interestingly, the two lymphomas that could be of NK-cell origin (cases 2 and 8) also shared this histology, suggesting that lineage derivation might be of minor importance in this group of lymphomas. However, CD56 expression did not always predict morphology and vice versa, as a few CD56+ lymphomas showed other histologies and four monomorphic medium-sized cell lymphomas were unreactive to the CD56 antibody.
Some other features distinguishing CD56+ from
CD56- ITLs were observed. The significantly less frequent
expression of CD8 among the latter, which were composed predominantly
of pleomorphic medium and large cells or had a morphology most
consistent with ALCL, could be due to antigen loss or, alternatively,
indicate that the majority of the CD56- ITLs are derived
from the small subset of CD8-CD4-TCR-
ß T
cells present in normal jejunum.13
Histological evidence of
enteropathy and a preceding diagnosis of CD were significantly less
frequent in CD56+ lymphomas as compared with
CD56- tumors. However, these findings should be
interpreted with caution because CD-oriented clinical work-up was
insufficient. Moreover, it is conceivable that in an unknown proportion
of these putative non-EATCLs enteropathic changes have been missed
because of their patchy distribution or have not been present at all,
as recently described in patients with so-called latent (potential)
CD.50,51
Finally, and most important, no HLA data were
available that could clearly demonstrate whether or not these cases
were associated with the CD-HLA genotype.52
In conclusion, the majority of CD56+ intestinal lymphomas are morphologically and phenotypically distinct T-cell lymphomas most likely derived from activated cytotoxic CD56+CD8+ IELs. There is, however, some overlap between CD56+ and CD56- ITLs in terms of presumptive cellular origin from the IEL compartment, histological appearance, clinical presentation, and outcome, suggesting that CD56+ intestinal lymphomas belong to the clinicopathological entity of ITL. The consistent expression of cytotoxic-granule-associated proteins introduces ITL (both CD56+ and CD56-) into the growing family of usually aggressive extranodal lymphomas of cytotoxic T-cell and NK-cell derivation. In contrast to putative NK-cell lymphoma of the sinonasal region, intestinal NK-cell lymphoma seems to be very rare, reflecting one of the unique properties of the intestinal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, which is almost devoid of NK cells.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication August 5, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chain rearrangements in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Br J Haematol 1996, 94:136-139[Medline]
T-cell receptor gene rearrangements in a subset of peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Am J Pathol 1988, 130:436-442[Abstract]

T-cell origin. Blood 1996, 88:4265-4274
T-cell lymphoma: a subset of cytotoxic lymphomas with mucosal or skin localization. Blood 1998, 91:1723-1731This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Daum, R. Ullrich, W. Heise, B. Dederke, H.-D. Foss, H. Stein, E. Thiel, M. Zeitz, and E.-O. Riecken Intestinal Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study From the German Study Group on Intestinal Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2003; 21(14): 2740 - 2746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gobbi, M. Buess, A. Probst, S. Ruegg, P. Schraml, R. Herrmann, A. J. Steck, and S. Dirnhofer Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma with initial manifestation in the CNS Neurology, May 27, 2003; 60(10): 1718 - 1719. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Krenacs, M. J. Smyth, E. Bagdi, T. Krenacs, L. Kopper, T. Rudiger, A. Zettl, H. K. Muller-Hermelink, E. S. Jaffe, and M. Raffeld The serine protease granzyme M is preferentially expressed in NK-cell, gamma delta T-cell, and intestinal T-cell lymphomas: evidence of origin from lymphocytes involved in innate immunity Blood, May 1, 2003; 101(9): 3590 - 3593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Hoffmann, H Vogelsang, K Kletter, G Zettinig, A Chott, and M Raderer 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) for assessment of enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma Gut, March 1, 2003; 52(3): 347 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-Q. Du and P. G. Isaacson First Steps in Unraveling the Genotype of Enteropathy-Type T-Cell Lymphoma Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2002; 161(5): 1527 - 1529. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zettl, G. Ott, A. Makulik, T. Katzenberger, P. Starostik, T. Eichler, B. Puppe, M. Bentz, H. K. Muller-Hermelink, and A. Chott Chromosomal Gains at 9q Characterize Enteropathy-Type T-Cell Lymphoma Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2002; 161(5): 1635 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.S. Chim, C.C.K. Lam, J.M. Nicholls, G.C. Ooi, and Y.L. Kwong Unusual Hematologic Malignancies: Case 3. CNS Involvement in CD56-Positive Intestinal Gamma/Delta T-Cell Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2002; 20(17): 3742 - 3744. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Daum, D Weiss, M Hummel, R Ullrich, W Heise, H Stein, E-O Riecken, H-D Foss, and the Intestinal Lymphoma Study Group Frequency of clonal intraepithelial T lymphocyte proliferations in enteropathy-type intestinal T cell lymphoma, coeliac disease, and refractory sprue Gut, December 1, 2001; 49(6): 804 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Haedicke, F. C. S. Ho, A. Chott, L. Moretta, T. Rudiger, G. Ott, and H. K. Muller-Hermelink Expression of CD94/NKG2A and killer immunoglobulin-like receptors in NK cells and a subset of extranodal cytotoxic T-cell lymphomas Blood, June 1, 2000; 95(11): 3628 - 3630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bagdi, T. C. Diss, P. Munson, and P. G. Isaacson Mucosal Intra-epithelial Lymphocytes in Enteropathy-Associated T-Cell Lymphoma, Ulcerative Jejunitis, and Refractory Celiac Disease Constitute a Neoplastic Population Blood, July 1, 1999; 94(1): 260 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |