| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
From the Department of Pathology*
and the
Division of Cell and Molecular Pathology,
University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, and the Department of
Pathology,
Erasmus University of Rotterdam,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A splice donor site mutation in
intron 4 was identified in both the tumor and blood DNA,
indicating the presence of a thus far unknown MEN1 syndrome. In most
tumor groups the frequency of allelic deletions at 11q13 was 2 to 3
times higher than the frequency of identified MEN1 gene
mutations. Some tumor types, including rare forms of EPT and
NET of the duodenum and small intestine, exhibited mutations
more frequently than other types. Furthermore, somatic
mutations were not restricted to foregut tumors but were also
detectable in a midgut tumor (15.2% versus 16.6%). Our
data indicate that somatic MEN1 gene mutations
contribute to a subset of sporadic EPT and NET, including
midgut tumors. Because the frequency of mutations varies significantly
among the investigated tumor subgroups and allelic deletions are 2 to 3
times more frequently observed, factors other than
MEN1 gene inactivation, including other
tumor-suppressor genes on 11q13, may also be involved in the
tumorigenesis of these neoplasms.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The vast majority of NET and EPT occur sporadically, but a subset of tumors is associated with inherited syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome.5,6 Although the molecular basis of these familial tumors has recently been established,5,6 only little is known about the oncogenesis and molecular basis of progression of sporadically occurring EPT and NET.
MEN1 is an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder characterized by the development of NET in the parathyroid glands, the endocrine pancreas or duodenum, and in the anterior pituitary.7 Up to 9% of MEN1 gene carriers develop NET at other locations, especially in the foregut (thymus, lung, or stomach), and may also suffer from nonneuroendocrine neoplasms such as lipomas, angiofibromas, or ependymomas.7 The gene for MEN1 has previously been localized to chromosome 11q138 and was recently cloned.5 A tumor suppressor function for the MEN1 gene has been suggested based on frequent chromosome 11q13 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in neoplasms of affected patients.8,9 Allelic deletions10,11 and recent mutation analysis studies12-15 had implicated the MEN1 gene as a tumor suppressor in a significant fraction of the sporadic counterparts of typical MEN1 neoplasms and it has been hypothesized that these tumors are restricted to the foregut.16,17 However, in previous studies Jakobovitz et al11 demonstrated that loss of 11q13 is also encountered in 100% and 63% of sporadic NET of the midgut and hindgut, respectively, suggesting that somatic mutations of the MEN1 gene might also contribute to the pathogenesis of these tumors. A systematic examination of both allelic deletions and mutations of the MEN1 gene in the latter tumor types, however, is missing.
In the present study, we analyzed 53 tumor tissues, including sporadic NET of the lung and gastrointestinal tract and EPT, for inactivation of the MEN1 gene to test the hypothesis that MEN1 gene mutations in sporadic tumors are restricted to foregut tumors. Both allelic deletions of chromosome 11q13 and MEN1 gene mutations were assessed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Frozen tissue samples from 53 patients with EPT or NET were
obtained from the files of the Departments of Pathology at the
University of Zürich and Erasmus University of Rotterdam.
The samples included 30 EPT (9 insulinomas, 5 VIPomas, 3
gastrinomas, 1 glucagonomas, 1 somatostatinoma, 11 nonfunctional
tumors) and 23 well differentiated NET (12 lung, 2 stomach, 3 duodenum,
3 ileum, 1 colon, 1 liver, 1 metastasis) (Table 1)
. Because a different pathogenic
mechanism has been suggested for poorly differentiated (eg, small cell
and large cell) neuroendocrine carcinomas, these neoplasms were not
included in the present study.
|
MEN1 Gene Mutation Analysis
Genomic DNA was isolated as recently
described.19,20
DNA from peripheral blood
leukocytes of healthy persons served as negative controls and from MEN1
patients from our files as positive controls. The 2790-bp coding region
and splice sites of the MEN1 gene were screened for
mutations according to our previously published
protocols.21
Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) fragments ranging from 244 to 409 bp in length were amplified
from 100-ng tumor or germline DNA using previously published primers
and conditions21
(see Table 2
). In brief, PCR amplification of exons
3 to 9 was performed in a total amount of 50 µl reaction mixture
containing 0.2 mmol/L dATP, dTTP, dGTP, dCTP, 50 pmol of each
sense and antisense primer, 1.5 mmol/L Mg2+, 10
mmol/L Tris-HCl, 50 mmol/L KCl, and 1 Unit Taq DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq
Gold, Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT). For PCR amplification of exons 2 and
10, Expand High Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim,
Germany) and 10% DMSO were used.
|
MEN1 Allelic Deletion Analysis
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
analysis was performed as recently described, using the cosmid clone
c10B11 (40 kb) containing the MEN1 gene as a
probe.21
In brief, touch preparations from frozen
tissue samples were fixed in 70% ethanol for 1 hour, treated with 100
µg/ml pepsin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 0.01 N HCl for 20
minutes at 37°C, and postfixed for 10 minutes in 1% formaldehyde in
phosphate-buffered saline at room temperature.24
Fluorescein-labeled cosmid probe (250 ng) and 20 ng of rhodamin-labeled
-repetitive DNA specific for chromosome 11 in hybridization buffer
(50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 2x SSC, herring sperm DNA,
yeast tRNA, Cot-1 fraction of human DNA) were hybridized overnight in a
humidified chamber at 37°C. Posthybridization washes were performed
at 45°C in 50% formamide/2x SSC (3 times for 5 minutes) and 0.1x
SSC (3 times for 5 minutes). Amplification of the cosmid probe signal
was achieved using rabbit anti-fluorescein (Dako, Copenhagen,
Denmark) and swine anti-rabbit Ig fluorescein antibodies,
followed by dehydration of the slides and mounting in Vectashield
(Vector, Burlingame, CA) containing 0.5 µg/ml
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole antifade (DAPI, Sigma) for nuclear
counterstaining. Hybridization signals of at least 100 interphases for
each tumor were scored using a Zeiss Axioplan fluorescence
microscope with appropriate filter sets. Images were taken with
a CCD camera using the Vysis Quips FISH software (IG
Instrumenten-Gesellschaft AG, Bern, Switzerland). The presence of only
one MEN1 cosmid signal in more than 30% of tumor cells was
interpreted as an allelic deletion. Normal connective tissue in the
vicinity of tumors served as internal control and exhibited nuclei with
one MEN1 signal in 3 to 7% of cells.
In 34 patients from whom DNA of nontumorous tissue or blood was available, samples were also screened for allelic deletion using three polymorphic markers on 11q13 as recently described25 and the DNA was visualized by silver staining as described above. The markers included an intragenic microsatellite marker (D11S4946) at the MEN1 5' region and two flanking 11q13 markers, PYGM (human muscle glycogen phosphorylase) and D11S4936.26
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
A splice acceptor site mutation in intron 4 that was
detectable in various nontumorous tissues and blood; he was therefore
diagnosed as a MEN1 gene carrier.21
This patient's tumor also exhibited an allelic deletion at the
intragenic MEN1 gene microsatellite locus D11S4946. The
overall frequency of identified somatic MEN1 gene mutations
in the 52 analyzed real sporadic cases of our study was
therefore 15.3% (8/52). The highest frequency of mutations was found
in gastrointestinal NET (2/11; 18%) and NET of the lung (2/11; 18%)
followed by EPTs (4/30; 13.3%). The identified somatic mutations
consisted of 2 stop codon mutations (Q450X, Q209X), 4 missense
mutations (L37P, A50P, D172V, V53I), one deletion of 7 bp (1674del7),
and one 29-bp insertion (434ins29). The greatest number of mutations
was encountered in exon 2 (four tumors), followed by exon 3 (two
tumors); one mutation each was found in exons 9 and 10. All
tumors with somatic MEN1 gene mutations also exhibited an
allelic deletion at the MEN1 locus, either by microsatellite
analysis using the marker D11S4946 or by FISH, with the exception of
one tumor from which no normal tissue or sufficient fresh material was
available for analysis (sample 49, Tables 2 and 3PCR-LOH and FISH analysis performed in 49 sporadic tumors (PCR-LOH in 8, FISH in 16, and both analyses in 25 tumors) revealed an allelic deletion of the MEN1 locus in 18 tumors (36.7%) and at 11q13 in 19 tumors (38.7%). This additional tumor exhibited an isolated allelic deletion of the PYGM locus. The frequency in EPT was 43.3% (13/30) and in NET 26.3% (5/19). Thus a two- to threefold higher frequency of allelic deletions in comparison to detected MEN1 gene mutations was found in all analyzed tumor groups.
Among the different pancreatic tumor groups, the frequencies of allelic deletions and mutations in insulinomas were 4/9 and 1/9, in gastrinomas 2/3 and 0/3, in VIPomas 4/5 and 2/5, in glucagonomas 0/1 and 0/1, in somatostatinomas 1/1 and 1/1, and in nonfunctioning EPT 3/11 and 0/11. Thus the combined frequency of allelic deletions and mutations in EPT of our series were 13/30 (43.3%) and 4/30 (13.3%), respectively.
In the analyzed sporadic NET, allelic deletions and mutations occurred in 7/19 (26.3%) and 4/22 (18.1%) samples, respectively (lung 2/10 and 2/11, stomach 2/2 and 0/2, duodenal gastrinomas 2/3 and 1/3, small intestine 0/2 and 1/3, colon 0/1 and 0/1, liver 0/1 and 0/1, and metastasis of a gastrointestinal NET 0/0 and 0/1).
Allelic deletions and mutations were found in 18/45 (40%) and 7/46 (15.2%) of foregut tumors and in 0/4 and 1/6 (16.6%) of midgut and hindgut tumors.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
So far, only one study of NET of the gastrointestinal tract and one of NET of the lung have been published.12,17 Present and recently published data suggest that the overall frequency of allelic deletion at the MEN1 locus in these tumors appears to be 58.4% (31/53) and the mutation rate 23.2% (17/73). Thus, the rates of allelic deletion and mutations of the MEN1 gene in sporadic EPT and NET appear to be very similar, indicating that the MEN1 gene plays a role in the tumorigenesis of approximately one fifth of the sporadically encountered tumors. The highest frequencies of MEN1 mutations in sporadic NET were encountered in the duodenum (31%) and the lung (27%), whereas tumors of the stomach, small intestine, and colorectum exhibit mutations less frequently. These findings indicate that, like tumors of the endocrine pancreas, an organ- or cell type-specific pattern of MEN1 gene mutations might exist. However, this assumption may be biased by the small numbers of tumors examined for certain tumor types.
Combining our results with those recently published, it appears that virtually all examined tumor groups exhibit an overall LOH rate of 50% at the MEN1 locus and that the frequencies of encountered allelic deletions is usually 2 to 3 times higher than the frequency of mutations of the MEN1 gene. This suggests that LOH at 11q13 per se is not an indicator of MEN1 mutations. Such findings can easily be explained by other modes of MEN1 gene inactivation, such as methylation of the promotor or noncoding regions or the presence of mutations in unexamined gene regions. It seems also likely that the higher frequency of allelic deletions is an indicator for the inactivation of yet another tumor suppressor gene on 11q13 in these tumors. Thus, two recent deletion mapping studies of 11q13 on 59 sporadic neuroendocrine neoplasms of different locations provided evidence that a second tumor suppressor gene in the interval between D11S4907 and D11S987 telomeric of the MEN1 gene locus might also be involved in the tumorigenesis of sporadic neuroendocrine neoplasms.30,31
Another interesting finding of our study is that the MEN1 gene mutations encountered were not restricted to foregut tumors, as recently reported by Toliat et al17 and suggested by Debelenko et al.16 Indeed, the frequencies of mutations in foregut and mid/hindgut tumors were very similar (15.2% versus 16.6%), despite the fact that the number of investigated mid/hindgut tumors was much smaller than that of the foregut tumors (6 versus 46). It remains to be seen, however, if NET of the hindgut (colon and rectum) also contain somatic MEN1 gene mutations, because we have investigated only one colonic neuroendocrine carcinoid tumor and Toliat et al investigated only four tumors, including one NET of the appendix.
Analysis of the published data and that presented here makes it clear that missense mutations are the most frequently encountered mutation type (14 tumors), followed by deletions (8 tumors), stop codon mutations (6 tumors), and insertions (3 tumors). Furthermore, the majority of alterations are encountered in the 5' part of the coding region of the MEN1 gene. No correlation seems to exist between tumor type and a particular type or location of mutation in the MEN1 gene. Likewise, no association between type or location of the mutation and clinical course could be established.
From all of the evidence discussed above, it appears that the most useful application of MEN1 gene mutation analysis would be to identify MEN1 gene carriers among patients with clinically sporadic EPT or NET. As a case in point, one individual with a NET of the lung in our series turned out to be a MEN1 gene carrier. Based on clinical experience it is estimated that the de novo mutation rate of MEN1 is approximately 10% and that 1.5% of patients suffering from gastrointestinal NET are in fact MEN1 gene carriers.32 Thus, we recommend testing all patients suffering from multiple NET or a combination of NET or EPT and other MEN1-associated lesions of the skin, adipose tissue, or the adrenal cortex for MEN1 gene mutations.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Swiss Cancer League (SKL 649-2-1998 to PK and JR) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (3153625.98 to PK and EJMS).
Accepted for publication November 5, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Nagano, D. H. Kim, L. Zhang, J. A White, J. C Yao, S. R Hamilton, and A. Rashid Allelic alterations in pancreatic endocrine tumors identified by genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 483 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y M H Jonkers, S M H Claessen, A Perren, S Schmid, P Komminoth, A A Verhofstad, L J Hofland, R R de Krijger, P J Slootweg, F C S Ramaekers, et al. Chromosomal instability predicts metastatic disease in patients with insulinomas Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 435 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Furlan, R. Cerutti, S. Uccella, S. La Rosa, E. Rigoli, A. Genasetti, and C. Capella Different Molecular Profiles Characterize Well-Differentiated Endocrine Tumors and Poorly Differentiated Endocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic Tract Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 10(3): 947 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. O. Turner, P. D. Leotlela, A. A. J. Pannett, S. A. Forbes, J. H. D. Bassett, B. Harding, P. T. Christie, D. Bowen-Jones, S. Ellard, A. Hattersley, et al. Frequent Occurrence of an Intron 4 Mutation in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2688 - 2693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Guo and M. P. Sawicki Molecular and Genetic Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type-1 Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2001; 15(10): 1653 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lubomierski, M. Kersting, T. Bert, K. Muench, U. Wulbrand, M. Schuermann, D. Bartsch, and B. Simon Tumor Suppressor Genes in the 9p21 Gene Cluster Are Selective Targets of Inactivation in Neuroendocrine Gastroenteropancreatic Tumors Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 61(15): 5905 - 5910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. M. Speel, A. F. Scheidweiler, J. Zhao, C. Matter, P. Saremaslani, J. Roth, P. U. Heitz, and P. Komminoth Genetic Evidence for Early Divergence of Small Functioning and Nonfunctioning Endocrine Pancreatic Tumors: Gain of 9Q34 Is an Early Event in Insulinomas Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 61(13): 5186 - 5192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Barghorn, E. J. M. Speel, B. Farspour, P. Saremaslani, S. Schmid, A. Perren, J. Roth, P. U. Heitz, and P. Komminoth Putative Tumor Suppressor Loci at 6q22 and 6q23-q24 Are Involved in the Malignant Progression of Sporadic Endocrine Pancreatic Tumors Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2001; 158(6): 1903 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Desai, L. A. McPherson, J. P. T. Higgins, and R. J. Weigel Genetic Analysis of a Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Patient with MEN1 Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 8(4): 342 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Tonnies, M R Toliat, C Ramel, U F Pape, H Neitzel, W Berger, and B Wiedenmann Analysis of sporadic neuroendocrine tumours of the enteropancreatic system by comparative genomic hybridisation Gut, April 1, 2001; 48(4): 536 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhao, R. R. de Krijger, D. Meier, E.-J. M. Speel, P. Saremaslani, S. Muletta-Feurer, C. Matter, J. Roth, P. U. Heitz, and P. Komminoth Genomic Alterations in Well-Differentiated Gastrointestinal and Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumors (Carcinoids) : Marked Differences Indicating Diversity in Molecular Pathogenesis Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2000; 157(5): 1431 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Yu, R. T. Jensen, I. A. Lubensky, E. H. Mahlamaki, Y.-L. Zheng, A. M. Herr, and L. J. Ferrin Survey of Genetic Alterations in Gastrinomas Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 60(19): 5536 - 5542. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Perren, P. Komminoth, P. Saremaslani, C. Matter, S. Feurer, J. A. Lees, P. U. Heitz, and C. Eng Mutation and Expression Analyses Reveal Differential Subcellular Compartmentalization of PTEN in Endocrine Pancreatic Tumors Compared to Normal Islet Cells Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2000; 157(4): 1097 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. M. Speel, J. Richter, H. Moch, C. Egenter, P. Saremaslani, K. Rutimann, J. Zhao, A. Barghorn, J. Roth, P. U. Heitz, et al. Genetic Differences in Endocrine Pancreatic Tumor Subtypes Detected by Comparative Genomic Hybridization Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 1999; 155(6): 1787 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Volante, M. Papotti, J. Roth, P. Saremaslani, E. J. M. Speel, R. V. Lloyd, J. A. Carney, P. U. Heitz, G. Bussolati, and P. Komminoth Mixed Medullary-Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma : Molecular Evidence for a Dual Origin of Tumor Components Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 1999; 155(5): 1499 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |