| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
§
From the Departments of Surgery*
and
Pathology,
Turku University Central Hospital,
Turku, the Department of Medical Biochemistry,
University of Turku, Turku, and the Department of
Anatomy,§
University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NF1 mRNA is ubiquitously expressed as estimated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of rat tissues.15,16 In humans, the tissue distribution of neurofibromin is less well known. To our knowledge, NF1 mRNA or protein levels have not been investigated either in human or in rodent urinary bladder. In one report on bladder cancer, potential mutations of codon 1423 of the NF1 gene were studied. In this codon, mutations have previously been reported in certain malignancies,6 but no mutations were observed in 31 bladder cancer specimens studied by Uchida et al.17 Neurofibromin contains a domain that is related to the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and accelerates the inactivation of proto-oncogene ras in various cell types18 and apparently interacts with microtubules.19,20 Thus, neurofibromin is likely to function as a regulator of cell growth and differentiation. Alternative splicing results in formation of different isoforms of neurofibromin mRNAs (types I to IV).21,22 Both type I and type II neurofibromin isoforms have an effect on ras inhibition, although type II is less potent.21
Ras refers to 21-kd proteins, which are products of the ras proto-oncogene superfamily in mammalians (H-ras, N-ras, and K-ras). Ras is present at the protein level in all cells, the highest levels being found in immature and proliferating cells.23,24 Ras functions as a GTP-binding protein (G-protein), which is necessary for normal cell growth and differentiation by connecting receptor signals to intracellular events.24,25 Ras cycles between an inactive GDP-bound state and an active GTP-bound state,26 which is controlled by inactivating signals through GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) and activating signals through guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs).27 GAPs trigger a 1 x 105-fold enhancement in the activity of intrinsic ras GTPase and thus inactivates ras.28 Mammalian cells have two ras-GAPs, namely, neurofibromin and p120-GAP.29 The balance of ras activity can be disturbed by alterations affecting any of these activating or inactivating proteins.
In the Finnish male population, urinary bladder cancer was third in incidence (15.8) after prostate cancer (61.4) and lung cancer (41.6) in 1995.30 In the Finnish female population, bladder cancer was less common, the incidence being 3.6 in 1995. A decade earlier, the incidence of bladder cancer in males was 13.0 and in females 2.4. The incidence of bladder cancer varies markedly throughout the world. For instance, in Canada, the incidence was 21.0 in males and 5.7 in females, and in Osaka, Japan, the incidence was 8.2 in males and 2.0 in females31 in the middle of the past decade. Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is the most common cancer type of the urinary bladder, representing approximately 90% of all cases. The risk factors for bladder carcinogenesis have remained largely unsolved, but smoking seems to be one among others. ras is the best characterized proto-oncogene involved in bladder carcinogenesis. ras mutations have been found in 40% of bladder carcinomas using PCR-based assays.32 There has been a wide interest in finding tumor suppressor proteins or other factors involved in bladder carcinogenesis. To date, mutations of the p53 suppressor gene are well documented factors to be involved in human urothelial carcinogenesis.33,34
In this study we have evaluated the expression of the NF1 gene in human bladder cancer cells of different grades both in vivo and in vitro using immunolabeling, Northern and Western transfer analyses, and in situ hybridization. The results indicate that NF1 gene expression is dramatically decreased during carcinogenesis, the expression being lowest in high-grade invasive carcinomas. We have also investigated the ratio of neurofibromin type I versus type II mRNA isoforms by RT-PCR and found that type II predominated in all samples studied.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 29 grades 1 to 3 TCCs of the urinary bladder were
obtained from Turku University Central Hospital, Department of
Pathology (Table 1)
, with appropriate
approval of the Joint Ethical Committee of the Turku University Central
Hospital and the University of Turku, Finland. The material included a
total of 12 grade 3 TCC samples, 10 grade 2 samples, and 7 grade 1
samples (Table 1)
. Most of the samples included both normal, or
non-neoplastic, epithelium and TCC tissue. Two pathologists studied the
samples independently, graded them, and ruled out possible necrosis in
the samples. The TCC tumors were evaluated by the degree of nuclear
atypia and epithelial disorganization of tumor cells, employing three
grades (grades 1, 2, and 3) according to the World Health Organization
classification of urinary bladder tumors.35
The papillary
or invasive growth pattern of urinary bladder carcinomas was designated
independently of grading of anaplasia, and the invasive growth pattern
of a TCC sample is indicated in Table 1
. For the present study, we have
used the terms low-grade carcinoma and high-grade carcinoma to indicate
grade 1 carcinoma and grade 2 or 3 carcinoma, respectively. Frozen
tissue was available from 4 of 29 tumors, and 1 frozen tumor was
obtained separately. Frozen tumor tissues were used as sources of RNA
for RT-PCR.
|
Antibodies
Immunohistochemical analyses and immunoprecipitation were carried out using affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody NF1GRP (D) raised against synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 2798 to 2818 of the predicted human neurofibromin (catalog item sc-67, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).2 Western blotting was performed using rabbit polyclonal antibody NF1GRP (N), which is raised against the epitope corresponding to amino acids 509 to 528 of the predicted human neurofibromin (catalog item sc-68, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).2 Secondary antibodies used in immunohistochemical analyses and Western transfer analysis are described below.
Avidin-Biotin Immunolabeling
The avidin-biotin immunolabeling was carried out using a Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens were cut to 5-µm sections, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and incubated with 0.4% pepsin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in 0.01 mol/L HCl at 37°C for 45 minutes. Slides were incubated with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol for 30 minutes to reduce endogenous peroxidase activity. Nonspecific binding was blocked using normal goat serum diluted 1:100 in 0.05 mol/L Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.5) for 2 hours. The sections were incubated with primary antibody NF1GRP (D) diluted 1:250 in TBS with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma Chemical Co.) at 4°C overnight and washed three times in TBS at room temperature. The samples were subsequently incubated with nonimmune goat serum with the same dilution as earlier for 20 minutes and exposed to biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:220 in TBS with 1% bovine serum albumin) for 30 minutes and to the avidin-peroxidase complex for 30 minutes. Samples were then incubated for 5 minutes with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (0.05%) in TBS with 0.07% imidazole (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.01% H2O2 to visualize the antibody localization. Finally, the slides were dehydrated and mounted. Control immunoreactions included the following: 1) primary antibody was replaced with 1% BSA/TBS, and 2) primary antibody was preabsorbed with a fivefold weight excess of synthetic peptide used for immunization as recommended by the manufacturer. In all controls, a faint uniform background reaction was observed. The samples were observed and photographed with a Leitz Aristoplan microscope equipped with a camera attachment using Fuji Superia film for color prints.
All tissue sections were treated identically, and the intensity of
immunosignal in TCC was compared with non-neoplastic urothelium. Most
of the tissue sections contained both TCC and non-neoplastic
epithelium, which showed almost identical immunosignal in all samples.
Those samples that did not contain non-neoplastic tissue (see Table 1
)
were compared with the same representative immunolabeled non-neoplastic
epithelium (samples N1 and N2 in Table 1
). The samples were scored for
overall intensity of cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. As almost all
non-neoplastic urothelium samples showed similar immunosignal with
staining of all epithelial cells, this signal was scored as having an
intensity value of 4. TCC tissue was scored on a four-tiered scale for
immunosignal, comparing TCC with non-neoplastic epithelium: similar
overall immunosignal, 4; moderate overall reduction, 3; marked
reduction, 2; absent or very weak immunosignal, 1 (Table 1)
.
In Situ Hybridization Analysis
For detection of NF1 mRNA by in situ hybridization, an NF1 sequence-specific cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR and subcloned to pBluescript vector. Specifically, primers 5' CAGAATTCCCCCCTCAACTTCGAAGT 3' and 5' TGCGTGCTGCATCAAAGTTGCTTTTCCAC 3'36 were used to amplify 303-bp and 366-bp sequences corresponding to types I and II neurofibromin, respectively. The 303-bp PCR product was purified from 3% agarose gels, digested with EcoRI and SmaI, and ligated to pBluescript vector. The identity of the sequence was confirmed by sequence analysis. In situ hybridizations were conducted according to previously described protocols with minor modifications.37,38 Here, the technique is described briefly. Linearized pBluescript plasmid containing the NF1 cDNA insert was used as a template. In vitro transcription reactions were performed in the presence of [35S](thio)UTP (>1000 Ci/mmol; Amersham International, Little Chalfont, UK) by using trans-Probe-T kit (Pharmacia LKB, Uppsala, Sweden) to produce the antisense strand (T7 RNA polymerase, plasmid linearized with ClaI), which was used as a probe, and the corresponding sense strand (T3 RNA polymerase, plasmid linearized with SacI), which was used in negative control hybridizations. After DNAse I digestion, the reactions were heated at 65°C for 15 minutes, cooled on ice, and fractionated on a Sephadex column G-50 (Pharmacia LKB). Surgical tumor samples were fixed in formalin immediately after resection and embedded in paraffin for sectioning. The 4-µm-thick sections were cut on silanated object slides and acetylated. The hybridizations were performed at 52°C for 18 hours with sense or antisense (cRNA) probes prepared as described above. The 35S-labeled cRNA-mRNA hybrids were detected by dipping the samples into NTB-3 autoradiography emulsion (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and exposing them in a desiccant-containing box for at 4°C for 10 to 36 days. The samples were developed with Kodak D-19 developer (Kodak-Pathé, Chalon-Sur-Saone, France), fixed with Agefix (Agfa-Gevaert, Leverkusen, Germany), stained with hematoxylin, dehydrated with ethanol, cleared with xylene, and mounted. For grain counting, sections were analyzed using a Nikon Optiphot II microscope equipped with Nikon 40x E Plan 0.65Na objective. The images were acquired with a DageMTI 72 CCD camera. Grain counting was performed with MCID-M4 image analysis software (Imaging Research, St. Catherines, Canada) after applying the target accentuation image-processing filter to each image. The grains were determined by placing a rectangular scan tool of 30 x 30 µm randomly over non-neoplastic urothelium, cancerous tissue, and background area that did not contain any of the tissue section.
Indirect Immunofluorescence
Glass slides covered with cultured cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and samples were fixed with ethanol at -20°C for 20 minutes. The samples were incubated with 1% BSA in PBS at room temperature for 30 minutes to reduce nonspecific binding of the antibodies. Primary antibody NF1GRP (D) (diluted 1:30 in 1% BSA in PBS) was incubated on the samples at 4°C overnight. Slides were washed three times with PBS, and a second blocking of nonspecific binding was performed as previously. The slides were incubated with tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated swine anti-rabbit IgG diluted 1:100 with 1% BSA in PBS (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark) at room temperature for 60 minutes, washed, rinsed with distilled water, and mounted with Glycergel (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). In control immunoreactions, primary antibody was replaced with 1% BSA/PBS. Only faint background fluorescence was observed in all control samples. The samples were observed and photographed with a Leitz Aristoplan epifluorescence microscope equipped with filters for TRITC fluorescence using Kodak T-Max film. For quantitation of the immunosignal, immunolabeled microscope slides were photographed to black and white negatives, and the optical densities of the negatives were analyzed by digital image analysis system MCID-M4. Negatives were digitized with a DageMTI 72E CCD camera and MicroNikkor 55-mm objective over a precision light table (Northern Light, Imaging Research). After the optical density calibration (with a Kodak 911ST602 intensity wedge), the negative frames from different cell lines and unexposed negative frames as background area were analyzed. The background was subtracted from the intensity values.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Transfer Analysis
Cells were rinsed twice with PBS at 4°C and lysed with 2 ml of lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, and 2 mmol/L EGTA) containing proteinase inhibitors (2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mmol/L p-aminobenzamidine with N-ethylmaleimide, and 5 mmol/L EDTA-Na) for 30 minutes. After incubation, cells were harvested, and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation (10,000 rpm at 4°C for 10 minutes). Protein concentration was measured using Bio-Rad Dc Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For immunoprecipitation, equal amounts of protein (4 mg) were incubated with 1 µg of polyclonal antibody NF1GRP (D) at 4°C for 24 hours and subsequently with 90 µl of protein A/Sepharose (CL-4B, Pharmacia LKB) at 4°C for 2 hours and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed two times with 1 ml of washing buffer 1 (1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton-X-100, 1 mmol/L EDTA, and PBS, pH 7.5), two times with washing buffer 2 (0.25 mol/L sodium chloride, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, and 0.02 mol/L Tris/HCl, pH 8.3), and subsequently two times with washing buffer 1. After the last wash, supernatant was removed, and 50 µl of solution containing 62.5 mmol/L Tris/HCl, pH 6.8, 2.3% SDS, and 8% glycerol was added. For Western transfer analysis, the immunoprecipitated samples were reduced and subjected to 5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a methanol-soaked Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore Co., Bedford, MA) in Tris/glycine buffer using 500 mA of current for 18 hours in a tank system (LKB Bromma 2005 Transphor electroblotting unit, LKB-Produkter, Bromma, Sweden). After transfer, the membrane was blocked by air drying at room temperature for 2 hours and incubated with polyclonal antibody NF1GRP (N) diluted 1:1000 in PBS with 1% BSA and 0.05% Tween (Tween 20, Fluka Chemie, Buchs, Switzerland) at 4°C overnight. The membrane was washed two times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween for 15 minutes and exposed to secondary antibody (donkey anti-rabbit IgG horseradish-peroxidase-linked whole antibody; code NA 934, Amersham International) in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.05% Tween for 1 hour. The membrane was washed with PBS/0.05% Tween two times for 15 minutes, and the bound peroxidase activity was detected using an ECL kit (Amersham International, Poole, UK) as recommended by the manufacturer. Chemiluminescence was detected with Kodak X-OMAT film (Kodak, Rochester, NY), and the signal was quantitated using MCID-M4 laser scanning densitometry (Imaging Research). As a control, the primary antibody was preabsorbed with a 10-fold weight excess of synthetic peptide used for immunization. No signal was observed in the control lanes.
Isolation of RNA and Northern Blot Analysis
Isolation of total RNA from cultured bladder cancer cells was performed as described previously.39 The cells were lysed in 2.7 ml of 4 mol/L guanidine thiocyanate, 25 mmol/L sodium acetate, and ß-mercaptoethanol. The lysates were layered onto a CsCl cushion (5.7 mol/L CsCl and 25 mmol/L sodium acetate) and centrifuged in a SW-55 rotor (Beckman, Palo Alto, CA) at 35,000 rpm at 20°C for 21 hours. Thereafter, the aqueous guanidine thiocyanate solution and CsCl were removed, and the RNA pellets were washed with 200 µl of 99.5% ethanol. The pellets were dissolved in 300 µl of RNAse-free water, RNA was extracted with 300 µl of phenol/chloroform (1:1), and the aqueous phase was precipitated with a 1:10 vol of 3 mol/L sodium acetate and 750 µl of 99.5% ethanol at -20°C. RNA pellets were dried and finally dissolved into RNAse-free water. Isolation of RNA from surgical bladder TCC specimens was performed as follows. Specimens were homogenized using an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer (Janke and Kunkel, Staufen, Germany) in 3.2 ml of 4 mol/L guanidinium thiocyanate, 25 mmol/L sodium acetate, and ß-mercaptoethanol. The lysates were centrifuged for 20 minutes at 10,000 rpm. Isolation of RNA from supernatant proceeded as described for cultured cells.
Aliquots (30 µg) of total RNA were fractioned electrophoretically on
1% agarose gels after denaturation with formalin and transferred to
Zeta-probe blotting membrane (Biorad). RNA was immobilized to membrane
by baking at 80°C for 30 minutes. The membrane was prehybridized for
2 hours in a solution containing 50% formamide, 0.25 mol/L
Na2PO4·H20 (pH 7.2), 0.25 mol/L
NaCl, 7% SDS, and 1 mmol/L EDTA. Hybridization was performed for 20
hours in the same solution containing a radiolabeled human
neurofibromin-specific 1.2-kb cDNA probe that was produced by PCR, as
described earlier,36
subcloned in a pBluescript vector, and
sequenced. The probe was radiolabeled with [
-32P]dCTP
using a random primed DNA labeling kit (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany).
After the hybridization, the membrane was washed two times in 2X
SSC/0.1% SDS at room temperature for 10 minutes and two times in 0.1X
SSC/0.1% SDS at 52°C for 15 minutes. Kodak Biomax films were exposed
to membranes at -70°C for 7 to 21 days.
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA (5 µg) isolated from cultured bladder cancer cells or from surgical tissue samples was transcribed into single-stranded DNA in a 20-µl reaction volume containing 200 U of murine Moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase enzyme (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY), first-strand buffer (250 mmol/L Tris/HCl, pH 8.3, 375 mmol/L KCl, and 15 mmol/L MgCl2), 0.5 mmol/L of each of the four deoxynucleotides, 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 20 U of RNasin (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), and 60 pmol of random primers (Promega Corp.). The reaction was allowed to proceed at 37°C for 90 minutes. For PCR, 2 µl of the RT reaction product was used as a template in a 50-µl reaction volume containing 15 pmol of neurofibromin-specific oligonucleotide primers NF1G.C and NF1G.D36 (sense, 5'-CAGAATTCCCCCCTCAACTTCGAAGT-3'; antisense, 5'-TGCGTGCTGCATCAAAGTTGCTTTTCAC-3'), 10 pmol of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)-specific primers (sense, 5'-TCTCATGGTTCACACCCATGACGAACATG-3'; antisense, 5'-AAGAAGATGCGGCTGACTGTCGAGCCACAT-3'), 10 nmol/L of each nucleotide, 1 U of Dynazyme (Thermus brockianus strain F500, Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland), 5 µl of 10X Dynazyme buffer (Finnzymes), and 39.5 µl of H20. Amplification was performed by incubating the mixture for 30 cycles of denaturation (60 seconds at 94°C), annealing (60 seconds at 64°C), and extension (60 seconds at 72°C). In the negative control samples, the template was omitted, and the PCR was performed in the same conditions as other samples. The PCR products were fractionated electrophoretically on 3% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For immunolocalization of NF1 protein in paraffin-embedded TCC
samples, avidin-biotin immunolabeling was performed. Most samples
included both neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue. Samples were scored
as described in Materials and Methods. Non-neoplastic transitional cell
epithelium displayed an intense immunoreaction with the NF1GRP (D)
antibody (Figure 1, E and F)
. In grade 1
TCC samples, four of seven showed a similar intense staining pattern as
seen in normal or non-neoplastic urothelium, whereas three of seven
showed a marked reduction in NF1 protein immunosignal. In grade 2 TCC,
6 of 10 samples showed marked reduction, and in 2 of 10 samples,
immunosignal was very weak or absent. In 2 grade 2 TCC samples, NF1
protein was expressed in similar intensity as seen in non-neoplastic
epithelium. In grade 3 TCC samples, 5 of 12 showed weak or absent
immunoreaction for NF1 protein, 5 of 12 samples showed marked
reduction, and 2 of 12 samples a moderate reduction in NF1 protein
expression. In conclusion, the intensity of NF1 protein immunosignal
showed reduction in 24 of 29 samples (83%), but generally the
reduction in immunosignal was more pronounced in grade 3 and in grade 2
than in grade 1. In all grade 3 TCC samples, the reduction of NF1
immunosignal was observed, whereas some grades 1 and 2 TCC samples
displayed NF1-specific immunosignal that was comparable to that of the
non-neoplastic control urothelium. Representative samples of grade 1
and grade 3 TCCs are presented in Figure 1
.
|
In Situ Hybridization Analysis of NF1 mRNA Expression in TCC and Non-Neoplastic Urothelium
In situ hybridization analysis was performed on
selected grade 3 TCC specimens to study potential differences in NF1
mRNA expression in TCC tissue and non-neoplastic transitional
epithelium in the same tissue sections (Figure 2)
. The autoradiographic grains
representative of radiolabeled neurofibromin-specific cRNA-mRNA hybrids
were quantitated as described in Materials and Methods. When comparing
random scan areas over background and cancer and non-neoplastic
urothelium, in situ hybridization for NF1 mRNA revealed mean
grain counts of 36, 52, and 217, respectively. When a mean grain size
of 6 µm2
was applied, the estimated grain counts were 38,
58, and 426, respectively. In control sections, sense probe was used
and only a faint background noise was observed. These results suggest
that the NF1 mRNA levels in grade 3 TCC were 20% of those of
non-neoplastic urothelium in the samples studied.
|
In additional studies, three well characterized cell lines
originally derived from carcinoma tissue corresponding to grades 1 to 3
were studied. The grade 1 RT4 cell line displayed an intense
immunoreaction for NF1 protein (Figure 3A)
. The immunosignal was markedly
decreased in the 5637 carcinoma cell line (grade 2) compared with the
RT4 cell line (Figure 3B)
. In the grade 3 T24 carcinoma cell line, the
immunosignal for neurofibromin was barely detectable (Figure 3C)
. The
intensity of immunosignal for NF1 protein in each culture was
quantitated as described in Materials and Methods. The results showed
that RT4, 5637, and T24 cells expressed NF1 protein in a 32:15:1
ratio. These results are consistent with the results obtained from
tissue immunolabelings demonstrating that poorly differentiated
carcinoma cells display very low levels of the tumor suppressor protein
neurofibromin. Furthermore, these results suggest that TCC cell lines
RT4, 5637, and T24 are useful tools in studies elucidating the
expression of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene.
|
Western blotting was performed as described in Materials and
Methods, and the specific neurofibromin NF1GRP(N)-antibody-labeled
bands (Figure 4)
were analyzed with the
MCID-M4 imaging system. The amount of neurofibromin was estimated by
background corrected area-under-curve (AUC) values, which were 120.9,
26.2, and 8.2 for cell lines RT4, 5637, and T24, respectively. The
relative amounts of NF1 protein in cell lines RT4, 5637, and T24 were
15:3:1, respectively. These results show
significant reduction in neurofibromin levels in poorly differentiated
urinary bladder carcinoma cell lines.
|
Under the cell culture conditions used, the NF1 mRNA levels in RT4
and 5637 cell lines were essentially the same, as estimated by Northern
blotting. The T24 cell line showed a marked reduction in NF1 mRNA
levels compared with the other two cell lines studied (Figure 5)
.
|
To determine the ratio of type I versus type II NF1
mRNA, RT-PCR analysis was performed for all three urinary bladder
carcinoma cell lines studied and for one grade 2 and four grade 3 TCC
tissue samples. GAPDH primers were used to enhance semiquantitative
evaluation of the RT-PCR analysis. The NF1 type II mRNA predominance
was evident in all samples, being more pronounced in mRNA derived from
cell culture samples. The type I versus type II NF1 mRNA
ratio was apparently the same in all samples representing different
grades of malignancy (Figure 6)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our first approach was to evaluate the level of NF1 gene expression in surgical TCC tumor samples using immunohistochemistry. The results showed that NF1 gene was expressed at a readily detectable level in non-neoplastic urothelium. In contrast, the TCC showed marked reduction in NF1 gene expression compared with normal urothelium. Furthermore, this reduction was more significant in grades 2 and 3 than in grade 1 TCC. These results suggest that bladder carcinogenesis is associated with reduction of NF1 tumor suppressor gene expression. In situ hybridization analysis of selected grade 3 TCC samples revealed that NF1 mRNA levels were decreased in these samples compared with adjacent non-neoplastic urothelium. Thus, both mRNA and protein levels were decreased in TCC tissues analyzed in the present study.
In additional studies, we used three well documented cell lines representing different grades of TCC. Immunohistochemical and Western transfer analyses demonstrated that NF1 protein expression was almost undetectable in T24 cells representing grade 3 TCC. In contrast, NF1 protein was readily detectable in RT4 cells (grade 1) and 5637 (grade 2). Data obtained from these analyses were quantitated by image analysis, and results were compared as numerical ratios. These studies demonstrated that the intensity of NF1 immunosignal in RT4 cells (grade 1) was 32-fold compared with that of T24 cells (grade 3). Immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting and subsequent quantitation of the chemiluminescence reaction showed a 15-fold difference in the same cells. Even though these two techniques did not give identical results, both demonstrated markedly higher levels of NF1 protein in RT4 cells (grade 1) than in T24 cells (grade 3). Northern transfer analysis of RNAs isolated from the three different TCC cell lines showed that the steady-state levels of NF1 mRNA in RT4 cells were also higher than in T24 cells. However, we have taken a critical view in the interpretation of the data obtained from Northern transfer analysis of cultured TCC cells. Specifically, our studies concerning TCC have shown that NF1 mRNA levels may oscillate significantly within hours depending on cell culture conditions (unpublished data).
Previous studies have shown that alterations in the type I versus type II NF1 mRNA ratio can be associated with the development of certain malignancies.47 We used RT-PCR to study three TCC cell lines and five surgical patient samples for possible alterations in the type I versus type II NF1 mRNA ratio. All samples showed type II predominance, and there was no significant difference in the ratio between the cell lines studied. The predominance was observed also in patient samples, but it was not as pronounced as that seen in vitro.
The best characterized role of NF1 protein is its GTPase-accelerating function, which leads to inactivation of ras.29 There are also reports that NF1 protein can inhibit ras-dependent growth by alternative ways independent of its GAP function.9,48 The reduction of NF1 gene expression reported here may thus lead to tumor promotion by affecting the ras-MAPK pathway in various ways. This requires additional studies on TCC, especially concentrating on ras and raf activity.
It is of interest that NF1 patients do not have an elevated incidence of TCC, as we have found only two case reports of NF1 patients with TCC.49,50 The same applies to some other malignancies harboring an inactivating mutation in the NF1 gene. Specifically, colon cancer and myelodysplasias are not more frequent in NF1 patients than in the control population.6 In analogy to the NF1 gene, mutations of the retinoblastoma gene are frequently seen in sporadic small-cell lung cancers (SCLCs), although SCLC does not have a higher incidence among hereditary retinoblastoma patients.51,52 On the other hand, eg, astrocytomas, which harbor an inactivating NF1 mutation, are seen in higher incidence among NF1 patients. Thus, the NF1 gene could play a different role in tumors originating from neural-crest-derived tissues in contrast to other tumor types, and different mechanisms of tumor growth promotion may be operative in different types of tumors caused by NF1 mutations.6
A previous study on bladder cancer17 has reported that no mutations were detected in the NF1 gene in a region around codon 1423 in which somatic mutations have been found in colon adenocarcinoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, and anaplastic astrocytoma.6 Taken together, it seems unlikely that mutations of the NF1 gene would cause the reduction of NF1 mRNA and protein in high-grade TCCs in vivo and in vitro as reported in the present study. Earlier studies on other malignancies have reported mutations of the NF1 gene leading to loss of gene expression.7-9 The shortening of the cell cycle in poorly differentiated cancer cells could lead to diminution of primary transcripts from large genes such as NF1. However, this does not seem to be the case, eg, in RB gene expression in TCC, which is a large gene.53 RB gene expression is thoroughly studied in TCC, and it has been reported to be normal in the majority of the samples, but altered expression was seen in 30% to 40% of the cases.54,55 Our results suggest that other factors may be involved in bladder TCC leading to a reduction of NF1 gene expression. Mutations in the gene control regions, down-regulation of the gene for some reason, and possible post-transcriptional regulation of NF1 protein remain issues of speculation.
To conclude, we report reduction of NF1 tumor suppressor gene expression in TCC, which may play a role in development of this malignancy. The question of whether the changes in NF1 gene expression in TCC are causal or consequential with respect to the pathogenesis of TCC remains to be elucidated. Nevertheless, we consider these results significant and that the NF1 gene product may play a role in bladder transitional cell carcinogenesis. Furthermore, we envision that TCC cell lines used in this study provide a useful tool to investigate NF1 gene expression in TCC in vitro.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by grants from Turku University Central Hospital, Turku University Foundation, PPSHP Grant H01139, and the Academy of Finland.
V. Aaltonen and P. Boström contributed equally to this work.
Accepted for publication November 18, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Chen, Y. Qiu, L. Chen, L. Li, J. Chen, C. Zhang, B. Wang, Y. Yu, Z. Zhu, F. Zhu, et al. The Expression of Neurofibromin in Human Osteoblasts and Chondrocytes Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2008; 38(1): 25 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Cacev, S Radosevic, R Spaventi, K Pavelic, and S Kapitanovic NF1 gene loss of heterozygosity and expression analysis in sporadic colon cancer Gut, August 1, 2005; 54(8): 1129 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. T. Junttila, M. Laato, T. Vahlberg, K.-O. Soderstrom, T. Visakorpi, J. Isola, and K. Elenius Identification of Patients with Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Overexpressing ErbB2, ErbB3, or Specific ErbB4 Isoforms: Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Analysis in Estimation of ErbB Receptor Status from Cancer Patients Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 9(14): 5346 - 5357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Karashima, P. Sweeney, A. Kamat, S. Huang, S. J. Kim, M. Bar-Eli, D. J. McConkey, and C. P. N. Dinney Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Mediates Angiogenesis and Metastasis of Human Bladder Cancer through the Regulation of Interleukin-8 Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2786 - 2797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-L. Karvonen, M. Kallioinen, H. Yla-Outinen, M. Poyhonen, A. Oikarinen, and J. Peltonen Occult Neurofibroma and Increased S100 Protein in the Skin of Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1: New Insight to the Etiopathomechanism of Neurofibromas Arch Dermatol, October 1, 2000; 136(10): 1207 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |