help button home button Am J Pathol R & D Systems
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, C.
Right arrow Articles by von Deimling, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, C.
Right arrow Articles by von Deimling, A.
(American Journal of Pathology. 1999;155:627-632.)
© 1999 American Society for Investigative Pathology

Regular Articles

Molecular Genetic Analysis of Ependymal Tumors

NF2 Mutations and Chromosome 22q Loss Occur Preferentially inIntramedullary Spinal Ependymomas

Christian Ebert*, Markus von Haken{dagger}, Birgit Meyer-Puttlitz*, Otmar D. Wiestler*, Guido Reifenberger*, Torsten Pietsch* and Andreas von Deimling{ddagger}

From the Departments of Neuropathology*
and Neurosurgery,{dagger}
University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn; and the Department of Neuropathology,{ddagger}
Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ependymal tumors are heterogeneous with regard to morphology, localization, age at first clinical manifestation, and prognosis. Several molecular alterations have been reported in these tumors, including allelic losses on chromosomes 10, 17, and 22 and mutations in the NF2 gene. However, in contrast to astrocytic gliomas, no consistent molecular alterations have been associated with distinct types of ependymal tumors. To evaluate whether morphological subsets of ependymomas are characterized by specific genetic lesions, we analyzed a series of 62 ependymal tumors, including myxopapillary ependymomas, subependymomas, ependymomas, and anaplastic ependymomas, for allelic losses on chromosome arms 10q and 22q and mutations in the PTEN and NF2 genes. Allelic losses on 10q and 22q were detected in 5 of 56 and 12 of 54 tumors, respectively. Six ependymomas carried somatic NF2 mutations, whereas no mutations were detected in the PTEN gene. All six of the NF2 mutations occurred in ependymomas of WHO grade II and were exclusively observed in tumors with a spinal localization (P = 0.0063). These findings suggest that a considerable fraction of spinal ependymomas are associated with molecular events involving chromosome 22 and that mutations in the NF2 gene may be of primary importance for their genesis. Furthermore, our data suggest that the more favorable clinical course of spinal ependymomas may relate to a distinct pattern of genetic alterations different from that of intracerebral ependymomas.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ependymal tumors are histologically classified into distinct entities. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system distinguishes four major types of ependymal tumors: the myxopapillary ependymoma (WHO grade I), the subependymoma (WHO grade I), the ependymoma (WHO grade II), and the anaplastic ependymoma (WHO grade III).1 However, histological parameters alone appear to be of limited significance for the prognosis of patients with ependymomas and anaplastic ependymomas.2 The postoperative survival time of these patients also depends on clinical factors, such as age of onset, tumor location, and extent of tumor resection.3-5 For example, adult patients with ependymoma fare better than children with histopathologically comparable tumors.3 Moreover, spinal ependymomas are associated with a more favorable prognosis than intracranial ependymomas of the respective WHO grade.6

Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of molecular parameters for subdividing glioblastomas (GBM), oligodendrogliomas, and oligoastrocytomas into genetically distinct tumor groups that may be associated with a different prognosis and response to therapy.7-9 In contrast, no consistent alterations suitable for a molecular subdivision of ependymomas have been forwarded so far. Mutations in those genes frequently affected in gliomas such as TP53, CDKN2A, and EGFR have been shown to be rare.10-13 On the other hand, cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses of ependymal tumors have indicated that loss of the long arm of chromosome 22 is a common aberration in these tumors.14,15 The gene for neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) maps to 22q1216,17 and represents an interesting candidate gene for ependymomas, because patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 are predisposed to the development of ependymomas.18 However, previous analyses of NF2 on limited numbers of ependymal tumors produced conflicting results.11,19-22

Another interesting candidate tumor suppressor gene for ependymomas is the PTEN gene from 10q23, which is mutated in a significant fraction of glioblastomas.23-28 Individual ependymomas with allelic losses on the chromosomal arm 10q have been reported.29 However, so far PTEN has not been investigated for mutations in these tumors. In the present study, we have therefore examined a series of 62 ependymal tumors of all major histological types for allelic losses on the chromosomal arms 22q and 10p, as well as for mutations in the entire coding regions of the NF2 and PTEN genes.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor Specimens, Histopathology, and Control DNA

Native tumor specimens and corresponding blood samples were obtained from patients treated at the University Hospital Bonn, the University Hospital Zurich, and the University Hospital Düsseldorf between 1990 and 1998. DNA from 10 tumors came from the University of Chicago Medical Center and was previously examined for mutations in seven of the 17 NF2 gene exons.11 All tumors were classified according to the WHO guidelines. The tumor specimens were examined microscopically before phenolic DNA extraction to exclude contamination by nontumorous tissue. Our series of 62 tumor specimens included six myxopapillary ependymomas WHO grade I (E myx I; mean age 31 years), three subependymomas WHO grade I (SE; mean age 62 years), 29 ependymomas WHO grade II (E II; mean age 37 years), 23 anaplastic ependymomas WHO grade III (E III; mean age 20 years), and one ependymoblastoma WHO grade IV (EB; age 5 years). Seven of the tumors were located in the lateral ventricles, six in the third ventricle, 26 in the fourth ventricle, and 23 in the spinal cord. Tumor types and locations are summarized in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Clinical and Molecular Data of 62 Patients with Ependymoma

 
Microsatellite Analysis for Loss of Heterozygosity

To identify allelic losses on the chromosomal arms 10q and 22q, the following primer pairs were used for nonradioactive microsatellite analysis: D10S676, D10S677, D22S684, D22S258, and NF2-CA3. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a final volume of 10 µl containing 10 ng of DNA, 50 mmol/L KCl, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 200 µmol/L of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 0.1% gelatin, 10 pmol of each primer, 1.5–2.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.25 U Taq polymerase (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg). Initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes was followed by 30 cycles on an automated thermal cycler (Hybaid; Omnigene). These included denaturation at 94°C for 40 seconds, annealing at temperatures from 50°C to 62°C, depending on the primer pair for 40 seconds and extension at 72°C for 60 seconds. A final extension step at 72°C for 10 minutes was added. PCR products were separated on 8% denaturing acrylamide gels and visualized by silver staining. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was scored as previously described.30

Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism Analysis and Direct Sequencing

For analysis of the PTEN and NF2 genes two sets of previously published primers were used.25,31 PCR was performed in a final volume of 10 µl containing 10 ng of DNA, 50 mmol/L KCl, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 200 µmol/L of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 0.1% gelatin, 10 pmol of each primer, 1.0–2.0 mmol/L MgCl, and 0.25 U Taq polymerase (Gibco BRL). Initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 minutes was followed by 35 cycles on an automated thermal cycler (Biometra UNO Thermoblock, Göttingen, Germany). These included denaturation at 94°C for 40 seconds, annealing at temperatures ranging from 50°C to 62°C (depending on the primer pair) for 40 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 40 seconds. A final extension step at 72°C for 10 minutes was added. Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis was performed on a sequencing apparatus (Pokerface II; Hoefer, San Francisco, CA), using 8%, 10%, 12%, and 14% acrylamide gels. Electrophoresis was run at 3–40 W and variable temperatures for 15 h. Silver staining of the gels was performed as previously described.32 Aberrantly migrating SSCP bands were excised and the DNA was extracted, followed by reamplification with the same set of primers and sequencing on a semiautomatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems; model 373A), using a Taq cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems). Each amplicon was sequenced bidirectionally.

Statistical Analysis

The correlations of age versus location and age versus NF2 mutations were evaluated by the unpaired t-test. The associations of NF2 mutations with tumor location and NF2 mutations with LOH 22 were analyzed by the Fisher Exact Test.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Loss of Heterozygosity on Chromosomal Arms 10q and 22q

LOH at microsatellite markers from 22q was detected in tumors from 12 of 54 informative ependymoma patients (22%). Among these, nine were diagnosed as E II, two as E III, and one as EB IV. LOH at one or more loci on 10q was detected in tumors from five of 56 informative ependymoma patients (9%). Among these, one was diagnosed as E II and four as E III. The data are summarized in Table 1 .

SSCP and Sequencing of the NF2 and PTEN Genes

SSCP analysis was performed for all 17 exons of the NF2 gene, including the splice sites. PCR-amplified exons showed an aberrant migration pattern in seven of the 62 ependymomas. One of these seven patients exhibited the respective alteration in constitutional DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes. DNA sequencing of this case revealed a silent mutation that was interpreted as a sequence polymorphism.

In the remaining six patients, no SSCP shifts were obtained for constitutional DNA, indicating that the aberrant bands obtained from the tumor DNA represent somatic mutations. This assumption was confirmed by DNA sequencing, which revealed mutations affecting splice sites in two tumors, frameshift mutations (two deletions, one insertion) with the introduction of premature stop codons in three tumors, and a nonsense mutation creating an immediate stop codon in one tumor. The positions and types of sequence alterations are compiled in Table 2 . Representative data are shown in Figure 1 . All tumors with NF2 mutations were intramedullary spinal E II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. NF2 Mutations in Six Patients with Ependymomas

 


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Representative example of SSCP and DNA sequence analysis of the NF2 gene. Patient 9606 exhibited an altered migration pattern of SSCP fragments from exon 5 (top). Sequence analysis revealed a 7-bp duplication, indicated by a horizontal bar. The boundary between intron 4 and exon 5 of the antisense strand is indicated by a vertical bar (bottom).

 
SSCP analysis of all coding exons of the PTEN gene did not reveal aberrantly migrating bands in any region of the 62 ependymal tumors investigated. However, DNA controls from GBMs with known PTEN mutations showed the expected alterations with the assay conditions applied.

Association with and Correlation of Clinical, Morphological, and Molecular Features

Four of the six patients with somatic NF2 mutations were informative for at least one of the microsatellite markers from 22q analyzed. All four tumors displayed LOH at these loci, a finding indicating complete loss of wild-type NF2 in the tumor cells. LOH at loci from 22q was found in tumors from eight of 50 informative patients without a detectable NF2 mutation, including five of 21 informative E II. There was a significant association between NF2 mutation and LOH on 22q for the group of WHO grade II ependymomas (P = 0.01) as well as all ependymal tumors evaluated (P = 0.0016). NF2 mutations were detected in six of 14 intramedullary spinal E II, but in 0 of 15 intracranial E II. Thus NF2 mutations were closely associated with an intramedullary spinal localization of the tumor (P = 0.0063). The six patients (mean age 48 years) with tumors carrying a NF2 mutation were significantly older than the remaining 56 patients (mean age 29 years) of our series (P = 0.0439). In addition, the 23 patients with spinal ependymomas (mean age 41 years) were significantly older than the 39 patients with intracranial ependymomas (mean age 24 years; P = 0.0037). This association between age and tumor location (intramedullary spinal; mean age 47 years versus intracranial; mean age 27 years) remained significant, when only the 29 patients with an E II were considered (P = 0.0093).


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The present study reveals NF2 mutations in a high percentage (43%) of intramedullary spinal E II but fails to identify any NF2 mutations in intracranial E II as well as all E I myx, SE I, and E III studied. The number of NF2 mutations in intramedullary spinal E II may even be higher, given the limited sensitivity of SSCP analysis. Our findings confirm and explain previous data from independent studies that have yielded contradictory results. Whereas four studies11,20-22 analyzing a total of 38 ependymomas, four of which were of intramedullary spinal location, detected only one NF2 mutation in an intramedullary ependymoma, another report found five tumors with NF2 mutations among seven intramedullary spinal ependymomas.19 Our series of 62 ependymomas included 29 E II, 14 of which were intramedullary spinal and 15 were intracranial lesions. NF2 mutations were detected in six of 14 intramedullary but none of 15 intracranial E II (P = 0.0063). This nonrandom distribution suggests the existence of genetically distinct subsets among E II.

Cytogenetic alterations and allelic losses involving the long arm of chromosome 22 represent well-known aberrations in ependymal tumors.14,15,33-35 In our study, LOH 22 was most prevalent in intramedullary spinal E II and was seen in six of 11 informative cases. All informative intramedullary spinal E II patients with an NF2 mutation exhibited LOH 22. Although LOH on chromosome 22 occurred more frequently in patients with intramedullary than with intracranial ependymoma WHO grade II, this association failed to reach significance (P = 0.2). The association of LOH 22 with the presence of NF2 mutations suggests a close relationship between these alterations in E II. LOH 22 was also observed in three of 14 intracranial E II, in one of 17 anaplastic intracranial E III, and in one of two anaplastic intramedullary spinal E III. Because there was no association between LOH 22 and NF2 mutations among intracranial ependymomas, these data may either suggest the presence of another tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 22 or result from a chromosomal instability causing random deletion of genomic material. A putative chromosome 22 tumor suppressor gene other than NF2 has been proposed in cytogenetic studies.36 However, our data neither support nor exclude the existence of a further ependymoma-associated tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 22. It shall be interesting to await the analysis of the INI1/hSNF5/SMARCB1 tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 22, which has been shown to be mutated in pediatric rhabdoid tumors.37

Clinical data from previous reports support the hypothesis of distinct biological subsets of ependymoma. Intramedullary spinal ependymomas differ from intracranial ependymomas with respect to age at diagnosis and to prognosis. Patients with intramedullary spinal ependymoma are, on average, approximately 40 years of age.6,38-40 These spinal tumors are associated with a significantly better prognosis than their intracranial counterparts.6,41 Thus ependymomas are likely to include genetically different tumor entities, as has already been shown for glioblastomas and oligoastrocytomas. GBMs carrying TP53 mutations (termed GBM type 1) predominantly occur in younger patients and constitute the majority of secondary GBMs (ie, GBMs with a previous history of lower grade astrocytoma) and giant cell GBMs, whereas those without TP53 mutations (termed GBM type 2) usually develop as primary GBMs in patients of advanced age.7 Oligoastrocytomas fall into groups genetically resembling astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas, depending on the presence of TP53 mutations or allelic losses on the chromosomal arms 1p and 19q.8 In the case of oligoastrocytomas this distinction may be of major clinical relevance because allelic losses on 1p and 19q have been shown to be a highly predictive indicator for the chemosensitivity of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas.9 Likewise, molecular subdivision of ependymomas may prove to be of importance for future therapeutic procedures.

One study presented results hinting at the involvement of a chromosome 10 tumor suppressor gene in ependymomas.29 The PTEN gene is a likely tumor suppressor candidate for gliomas with allelic deletions on chromosome 10. None of the 62 ependymomas of our series was identified as carrying a mutation in this gene. These data probably exclude PTEN as an ependymoma relevant tumor suppressor gene. On the other hand, chromosome 10 may harbor other tumor-associated genes. An interesting candidate is the DMBT1 gene, which has been shown to be homozygously deleted in up to 38% of GBMs.42,43 Among 56 ependymomas informative for markers on the long arm of chromosome 10, LOH was observed in four E III and one E II. The higher fraction of LOH in E III may reflect an increase of genomic instability in these tumors or indicate an association with malignant progression. In the present series only two markers on 10q were examined. However, allelic losses on chromosome 10 in gliomas predominately include both arms and usually correspond to the loss of an entire chromosome. We therefore feel that our data do not support a prominent role for a tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 10 in the pathogenesis of ependymomas.

In conclusion, the present study of a large series of intramedullary spinal and intracranial ependymomas strongly supports the hypothesis that intramedullary spinal E II constitutes a molecularly distinct tumor entity characterized by a high incidence of LOH on 22q and NF2 gene mutations. Mutations in the PTEN gene on chromosome 10 seem not to play a significant role in ependymomas. The involvement of other putative tumor suppressor genes on chromosomal arms 22q and 10p/q merits further investigation.


   Acknowledgements
 
We thank O. Schmidt for her skillful technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to Dr. Andreas von Deimling, Institut für Neuropathologie, Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburgerplatz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: andreas.von_deimling{at}charite.de

Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 400) and the Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation.

M. von Haken's present address: Neurosurgical Service, Hospital Ludwigsburg, D-71640 Germany.

Accepted for publication May 1, 1999.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW: Histological Typing of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 1993 Springer-Verlag New York and Berlin
  2. Ross GW, Rubinstein LJ: Lack of histopathological correlation of malignant ependymomas with postoperative survival. J Neurosurg 1989, 70:31-36[Medline]
  3. Lyons MK, Kelly PJ: Posterior fossa ependymomas: report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1991, 28:659-665[discussion 664–665][Medline]
  4. Robertson PL, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Rorke LB, Allen JC, Geyer JR, Stanley P, Li H, Albright AL, McGuire-Cullen P, Finlay JL, Stevens KR, Jr, Milstein JM, Packer RJ, Wisoff J: Survival and prognostic factors following radiation therapy and chemotherapy for ependymomas in children: a report of the Children's Cancer Group. J Neurosurg 1998, 88:695-703[Medline]
  5. Sala F, Talacchi A, Mazza C, Prisco R, Ghimenton C, Bricolo A: Prognostic factors in childhood intracranial ependymomas: the role of age and tumor location. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998, 28:135-142[Medline]
  6. Mork SJ, Loken AC: Ependymoma: a follow-up study of 101 cases. Cancer 1977, 40:907-915[Medline]
  7. von Deimling A, von Ammon K, Schoenfeld D, Wiestler OD, Seizinger BR, Louis DN: Subsets of glioblastoma multiforme defined by molecular genetic analysis. Brain Pathol 1993, 3:19-26[Medline]
  8. Maintz D, Fiedler K, Koopmann J, Rollbrocker B, Nechev S, Lenartz D, Stangl AP, Louis DN, Schramm J, Wiestler OD, von Deimling A: Molecular genetic evidence for subtypes of oligoastrocytomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997, 56:1098-1104[Medline]
  9. Cairncross JG, Ueki K, Zlatescu MC, Lisle DK, Finkelstein DM, Hammond RR, Silver JS, Stark PC, Macdonald DR, Ino Y, Ramsay DA, Louis DN: Specific genetic predictors of chemotherapeutic response and survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998, 90:1473-1479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ohgaki H, Eibl RH, Wiestler OD, Yasargil MG, Newcomb EW, Kleihues P: p53 mutations in nonastrocytic human brain tumors. Cancer Res 1991, 51:6202-6205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. von Haken MS, White EC, Daneshvar-Shyesther L, Sih S, Choi E, Kalra R, Cogen PH: Molecular genetic analysis of chromosome arm 17p and chromosome arm 22q DNA sequences in sporadic pediatric ependymomas. Genes Chromosom Cancer 1996, 17:37-44[Medline]
  12. Fink KL, Rushing EJ, Schold SC, Jr, Nisen PD: Infrequency of p53 gene mutations in ependymomas. J Neurooncol 1996, 27:111-115[Medline]
  13. Nozaki M, Tada M, Matsumoto R, Sawamura Y, Abe H, Iggo RD: Rare occurrence of inactivating p53 gene mutations in primary non- astrocytic tumors of the central nervous system: reappraisal by yeast functional assay. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1998, 95:291-296[Medline]
  14. Ransom DT, Ritland SR, Kimmel DW, Moertel CA, Dahl RJ, Scheithauer BW, Kelly PJ, Jenkins BR: Cytogenetic and loss of heterozygosity studies in ependymoma, pilocytic astrocytoma and oligodendrogliomas. Genes Chromosom Cancer 1992, 5:348-356[Medline]
  15. James CD, He J, Carlbom E, Mikkelsen T, Ridderheim P-A, Cavenee WK, Collins VP: Loss of genetic information in central nervous system tumors common to children and young adults. Genes Chromosom Cancer 1990, 2:94-102[Medline]
  16. Trofatter JA, MacCollin MM, Ruttner JL, Murrell JR, Duyao MP, Parry DM, Eldridge R, Kley N, Menon AG, Pulaski K, Haase VH, Ambrose CM, Munroe D, Bove C, Haines JL, Martuza RL, MacDonald ME, Seizinger BR, Short MP, Buckler AJ, Gusella JF: A novel moesin-, ezrin-, radixin-like gene is a candidate for the neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor. Cell 1993, 72:791-800[Medline]
  17. Rouleau GA, Merel P, Lutchman M, Sanson M, Zucman J, Marineau C, Hoang-Zuang K, Demczuk S, Desmaze C, Plougastel B, Pulst SM, Lenoir G, Bijlsma E, Fashold R, Dumanski J, de Jong P, Parry D, Eldridge R, Aurias A, Delattre O, Thomas G: Alteration in a new gene encoding a putative membrane-organizing protein causes neurofibromatosis type 2. Nature 1993, 363:515-521[Medline]
  18. Martuza RL, Eldridge R: Neurofibromatosis 2 (bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis). N Engl J Med 1988, 318:684-688[Medline]
  19. Birch BD, Johnson JP, Parsa A, Desai RD, Yoon JT, Lycette CA, Li YM, Bruce JN: Frequent type 2 neurofibromatosis gene transcript mutations in sporadic intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas. Neurosurgery 1996, 39:135-140[Medline]
  20. Rubio MP, Correa KM, Ramesh V, MacCollin MM, Jacoby LB, von Deimling A, Gusella JF, Louis DN: Analysis of the neurofibromatosis 2 gene in human ependymomas and astrocytomas. Cancer Res 1994, 54:45-47[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Slavc I, MacCollin MM, Dunn M, Jones S, Sutton L, Gusella JF, Biegel JA: Exon scanning for mutations of the NF2 gene in pediatric ependymomas, rhabdoid tumors and meningiomas. Int J Cancer 1995, 64:243-247[Medline]
  22. De Vitis LR, Tedde A, Vitelli F, Ammannati F, Mennonna P, Bono P, Grammatico B, Grammatico P, Radice P, Bigozzi U, Montali E, Papi L: Analysis of the neurofibromatosis type 2 gene in different human tumors of neuroectodermal origin. Hum Genet 1996, 97(5):638-641[Medline]
  23. Steck PA, Pershouse MA, Jasser SA, Yung WKA, Lin H, Ligon AH, Langford LA, Baumgard ML, Hattier T, Davis T, Frye C, Hu R, Swedlund B, Teng DHF, Tavtigian SV: Identification of a candidate tumour suppressor gene, MMAC1, at chromosome 10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple advanced cancers. Nature Genet 1997, 15:356-362[Medline]
  24. Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, Podsypanina K, Bose S, Wang SI, Puc J, Miliaresis C, Rodgers L, McCombie R, Bigner SH, Giovanella BC, Ittmann M, Tycko B, Hibshoosh H, Wigler MH, Parsons R: PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science 1997, 275:1943-1947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Duerr EM, Rollbrocker B, Hayashi Y, Peters N, Meyer-Puttlitz B, Louis DN, Schramm J, Wiestler OD, Parsons R, Eng C, von Deimling A: PTEN mutations in gliomas and glioneuronal tumors. Oncogene 1998, 16:2259-2264[Medline]
  26. Wang SI, Puc J, Li J, Bruce JN, Cairns P, Sidransky D, Parsons R: Somatic mutations of PTEN in glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res 1997, 57:4183-4186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rasheed BK, Stenzel TT, McLendon RE, Parsons R, Friedman AH, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, Bigner SH: PTEN gene mutations are seen in high-grade but not in low-grade gliomas. Cancer Res 1997, 57:4187-4190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Boström J, Cobbers JMJ, Wolter M, Tabatabai G, Weber RG, Lichter P, Collins VP, Reifenberger G: Mutation of the PTEN (MMAC1) tumor suppressor gene in a subset of glioblastomas but not in meningiomas with loss of chromosome arm 10q. Cancer Res 1998, 58:29-33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Bijlsma EK, Voesten AM, Bijleveld EH, Troost D, Westerveld A, Merel P, Thomas G, Hulsebos TJ: Molecular analysis of genetic changes in ependymomas. Genes Chromosom Cancer 1995, 13:272-277[Medline]
  30. Louis DN, von Deimling A, Seizinger BR: A (CA)n dinucleotide repeat assay for evaluating loss of allelic heterozygosity in small and archival human brain tumor specimens. Am J Pathol 1992, 141:777-782[Abstract]
  31. Jacoby LB, MacCollin M, Louis DN, Mohney T, Rubio MP, Pulaski K, Trofatter JA, Kley N, Seizinger B, Ramesh V, Gusella JF: Exon scanning for mutation of the NF2 gene in schwannomas. Hum Mol Genet 1994, 3:413-419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. von Deimling A, Bender B, Louis DN, Wiestler OD: A rapid and non radioactive PCR based assay for the detection of allelic loss in human gliomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1993, 19:524-529[Medline]
  33. Weremowicz S, Kupsky WJ, Morton CC, Fletcher JA: Cytogenetic evidence for a chromosome 22 tumor suppressor gene in ependymoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1992, 61:193-196[Medline]
  34. Wernicke C, Thiel G, Lozanova T, Vogel S, Kintzel D, Janisch W, Lehmann K, Witkowski R: Involvement of chromosome 22 in ependymomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1995, 79:173-176[Medline]
  35. Blaeker H, Rasheed BK, McLendon RE, Friedman HS, Batra SK, Fuchs HE, Bigner SH: Microsatellite analysis of childhood brain tumors. Genes Chromosom Cancer 1996, 15:54-63[Medline]
  36. Park JP, Chaffee S, Noll WW, Rhodes CH: Constitutional de novo t(1;22)(p22;q11.2) and ependymoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1996, 86:150-152[Medline]
  37. Versteege I, Sevenet N, Lange J, Rousseau-Merck MF, Ambros P, Handgretinger R, Aurias A, Delattre O: Truncating mutations of hSNF5/INI1 in aggressive paediatric cancer. Nature 1998, 394:203-206[Medline]
  38. Epstein FJ, Farmer JP, Freed D: Adult intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: the result of surgery in 38 patients. J Neurosurg 1993, 79:204-209[Medline]
  39. McCormick PC, Torres R, Post KD, Stein BM: Intramedullary ependymoma of the spinal cord. J Neurosurg 1990, 72:523-532[Medline]
  40. Whitaker SJ, Bessell EM, Ashley SE, Bloom HJ, Bell BA, Brada M: Postoperative radiotherapy in the management of spinal cord ependymoma. J Neurosurg 1991, 74:720-728[Medline]
  41. Rawlings CEd, Giangaspero F, Burger PC, Bullard DE: Ependymomas: a clinicopathologic study. Surg Neurol 1988, 29:271-281[Medline]
  42. Mollenhauer J, Wiemann S, Scheurlen W, Korn B, Hayashi Y, Wilgenbus KK, von Deimling A, Poustka A: DMBT1, a new member of the SRCR superfamily, on chromosome 10q25.3–26.1 is deleted in malignant brain tumours. Nature Genet 1997, 17:32-39[Medline]
  43. Somerville RP, Shoshan Y, Eng C, Barnett G, Miller D, Cowell JK: Molecular analysis of two putative tumour suppressor genes, PTEN and DMBT, which have been implicated in glioblastoma multiforme disease progression. Oncogene 1998, 17:1755-1757[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Cancer ResHome page
J.-P. Kilday, R. Rahman, S. Dyer, L. Ridley, J. Lowe, B. Coyle, and R. Grundy
Pediatric Ependymoma: Biological Perspectives
Mol. Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 7(6): 765 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Neuro OncolHome page
J. M. de Bont, R. J. Packer, E. M. Michiels, M. L. d. Boer, and R. Pieters
Biological background of pediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma: A review from a translational research perspective
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(6): 1040 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Mendrzyk, A. Korshunov, A. Benner, G. Toedt, S. Pfister, B. Radlwimmer, and P. Lichter
Identification of gains on 1q and epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression as independent prognostic markers in intracranial ependymoma.
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2070 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
A. I. McClatchey and M. Giovannini
Membrane organization and tumorigenesis--the NF2 tumor suppressor, Merlin
Genes & Dev., October 1, 2005; 19(19): 2265 - 2277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
V P Collins
Brain tumours: classification and genes
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 75(suppl_2): ii2 - ii11.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Korshunov, K. Neben, G. Wrobel, B. Tews, A. Benner, M. Hahn, A. Golanov, and P. Lichter
Gene Expression Patterns in Ependymomas Correlate with Tumor Location, Grade, and Patient Age
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2003; 163(5): 1721 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Neuro OncolHome page
C. B. Knobbe, A. Merlo, and G. Reifenberger
Pten signaling in gliomas
Neuro-oncol, July 1, 2002; 4(3): 196 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
Y. Hirose, K. Aldape, A. Bollen, C. D. James, D. Brat, K. Lamborn, M. Berger, and B. G. Feuerstein
Chromosomal Abnormalities Subdivide Ependymal Tumors into Clinically Relevant Groups
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2001; 158(3): 1137 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, C.
Right arrow Articles by von Deimling, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, C.
Right arrow Articles by von Deimling, A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS