| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |


From the Veterans Affairs Medical Center,||
Iowa City,
Iowa; the Departments of Pathology,*
Surgery,¶
and Internal Medicine,||
University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa; the Department
of Biology,
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; the Department of Laboratory
Medicine and Pathology,
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota; and the Blood Center of Southeastern
Wisconsin,§
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because thrombin may affect wound healing by stimulating the proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts,16 we hypothesized that thrombomodulin may regulate reepithelialization and/or collagen deposition during cutaneous wound healing. In a previous study, we examined effects of increased keratinocyte thrombomodulin activity on wound healing in transgenic mice that express human thrombomodulin under the direction of a keratinocyte promoter.14 These mice, which had up to 300% of normal thrombomodulin activity in epidermis, exhibited normal wound reepithelialization but had evidence of impaired collagen deposition during cutaneous wound healing.14
The goals of the present study were to determine whether expression of thrombomodulin is regulated during cutaneous wound healing in humans and mice, and to determine whether wound healing is altered in thrombomodulin-deficient mice. Because mice with complete absence of thrombomodulin do not survive the embryonic period,17 we chose to compare wound healing in wild-type mice and three groups of mice, generated by homologous recombination, that have moderate or severe thrombomodulin deficiency. Our results demonstrate that expression of thrombomodulin in keratinocytes during cutaneous wound healing is regulated similarly in humans and mice, but that deficiency of thrombomodulin anticoagulant activity does not alter reepithelialization of cutaneous wounds.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After obtaining informed consent, punch biopsies (35 mm) of skin graft donor sites were performed in eight adult patients who required partial-thickness skin grafting for management of burn wounds. Donor sites were biopsied at the time of harvest (day 0), and on days 5, 10, and 30 after harvest. Local anesthesia was achieved by subdermal injection of 1% Xylocaine before biopsy, and biopsy sites were treated with topical antimicrobials. The protocol was approved by the University of Iowa Human Subjects Review Committee.
Cutaneous Wounds in Mice
Wound healing was studied in the following groups of mice: 1) heterozygous thrombomodulin-deficient (TM+/-) mice (n = 5) that were generated from crosses of TM+/- mice17 with C57BL/6 mice; 2) wild-type (TM+/+) mice (n = 13) that were either C57BL/6 mice obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or wild-type littermates from crosses of TM+/- mice with C57BL/6 mice; 3) compound heterozygous (TMpro/-) mice (n = 12) that have one null thrombomodulin allele and one mutant allele (replacement of glutamic acid 404 with proline);18 4) TM-/- chimeric mice (n = 15) that were generated by injecting homozygous thrombomodulin-null embryonic stem (ES) cells into the blastocele of either C57BL/6 or ROSA 26 embryos.19 ROSA 26 mice constitutively express ß-galactosidase, which facilitates detection of non-ES-derived cells in chimeric mice.20
Cutaneous wounds were created as described previously.14 Sixty different wounds were created in a total of 45 mice. Mice (34 months of age) were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg ip). Hair was shaved from the dorsal surface, and one or two full-thickness wounds (510 mm in diameter) were created through the panniculus carnosis. Wounds were allowed to heal for 3, 7, or 30 days, and then the mice were sacrificed and the wounds were removed for histological analysis. The protocol was approved by the University of Iowa, Veterans Affairs, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology Animal Care and Use Committees.
Histological Analysis
Human tissue was fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Immunoperoxidase staining for human thrombomodulin was performed using monoclonal antibody TM1009 (Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA) as described previously.3,11 Mouse wounds were bisected; one half of each wound was fixed in 10% formalin, and the other half was frozen in O.C.T. compound (Allegiance Health Care Corp., Omaha, NE). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of all wounds were stained with Massons trichrome or analyzed for murine thrombomodulin by immunoperoxidase staining, using the monoclonal antibody 273-34A21 (generously provided by Dr. Stephen J. Kennel, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN) as described previously.14
To detect ß-galactosidase activity, frozen sections were fixed for 5 minutes in acetone and washed two times with phosphate-buffered saline. Sections were then incubated in phosphate-buffered saline containing 35 mmol/L K3Fe(CN)6, 35 mmol/L K4Fe(CN)6, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate, 0.02% NP-40, and 1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) (Gold Biotechnology, St. Louis, MO) and counterstained with nuclear fast red.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine the pattern of expression of thrombomodulin in
keratinocytes during cutaneous wound healing, partial-thickness wounds
from skin graft donor sites were biopsied at the time of harvest and at
various times of healing, up to 30 days after harvest. In unwounded
human epidermis, thrombomodulin staining was absent in basal
keratinocytes and most intense in suprabasal spinous keratinocytes, and
diminished superficially within granular and cornified keratinocytes
(Figure 1A)
. Thrombomodulin was also
detected in endothelium within the dermis. On day 5 of healing, tongues
of neoepidermis were seen invading the provisional wound matrix (Figure 1B)
. Keratinocytes at the margins of the neoepidermal tongues stained
weakly or did not stain for thrombomodulin, but keratinocytes within
areas of neoepidermal stratification stained strongly for
thrombomodulin. On day 10 of healing, the neoepidermal tongues were
more highly stratified, and neoepidermal staining for thrombomodulin
was more prominent (Figure 1C)
. The marginal layer of neoepidermal
keratinocytes remained thrombomodulin-negative. By day 30 of healing,
wounds were completely reepithelialized, and thrombomodulin staining
was prominent in suprabasal keratinocytes (Figure 1D)
.
|
To determine whether expression of thrombomodulin is regulated
during cutaneous wound healing in mice, we examined full-thickness
wounds in wild-type (TM+/+) mice. Compared to human
epidermis, the epidermis of unwounded mouse skin was less stratified,
and epider- mal staining for thrombomodulin was much less
promi-nent (Figure 2A)
. On day 3 of
healing, strong staining for thrombomodulin was observed in
keratinocytes within the stratifying neoepidermis (Figure 2B)
. No
staining for thrombomodulin was detected in keratinocytes in the
marginal layer of the neoepidermis, which interacts directly with the
provisional wound matrix (Figure 2B)
. This pattern of thrombomodulin
expression was similar to that observed in human partial-thickness
wounds after 5 days of healing, except that expression of
thrombomodulin by keratinocytes within the interior of the neoepidermis
was even more exuberant in mouse wounds than in human wounds. On day 7
of healing of mouse wounds, a highly stratified,
thrombomodulin-positive neoepidermis extended over most of the wound
matrix (Figure 2C)
. On day 30, mouse wounds were completely
reepithelialized, with some residual hyperkeratinization and a more
prominent thrombomodulin staining pattern than that seen in unwounded
mouse skin (Figure 2D)
. Thus, although thrombomodulin is expressed only
weakly in unwounded mouse epidermis, its expression in keratinocytes is
markedly up-regulated during cutaneous wound healing.
|
The observation that expression of thrombomodulin is
regulated similarly during cutaneous wound healing in humans and mice
suggested that the mouse would be an appropriate animal model for
examining effects of thrombomodulin gene dosage on cutaneous wound
healing. Therefore, full-thickness wounds were created in three groups
of mice with varying degrees of thrombomodulin deficiency. The first
group consisted of wild-type (TM+/+) mice. The second group
consisted of heterozygous thrombomodulin-deficient (TM+/-)
mice that were generated from matings of TM+/- mice with
C57BL/6 mice. TM+/- mice have approximately 50%
thrombomodulin anticoagulant activity compared with TM+/+
mice.17
The third group consisted of compound
heterozygous (TMpro/-) mice that have one null allele and
one mutant thrombomodulin allele. TMpro/- mice have <1%
thrombomodulin anticoagulant activity compared with TM+/+
mice.18
Wounds were allowed to heal for 3, 7, or 30
days and then were harvested and analyzed histologically. No
differences in rate or extent of reepithelialization were observed
between TM+/+, TM+/-, or TMpro/-
mice. On day 3, all wounds exhibited marked neoepidermal proliferation
at the margin of the provisional wound matrix (not shown). On day 7,
all wounds exhibited a highly stratified neoepidermis extending from
the margin of the wound and overlying much of the wound matrix (Figure 3, A, C, E)
, and by day 30 all wounds
were completely reepithelialized (Figure 3, B, D, F)
. We did observe
some differences between the three groups of mice in collagen staining
by Masons trichrome within the wound matrix. The overall intensity of
collagen staining was similar in TM+/+, TM+/-,
and TMpro/- mice, but foci of increased collagen
deposition were apparent in the wound matrices of TM± and
TMpro/- mice compared to TM+/+ mice on day 7
(compare Figure 3, A, C, E
). On day 30, dense collagen staining was
observed in all three groups of mice, but collagen bundles tended to be
thicker and denser in TM+/- and TMpro/- mice
(Figure 3, D, F)
than in TM+/+ mice (Figure 3B)
.
|
The experiments described above in thrombomodulin-deficient mice
demonstrated that reepithelialization of cutaneous wounds proceeded
essentially normally in mice that have as little as 1% of normal
thrombomodulin anticoagulant activity. In an earlier study, we found
that reepithelialization of cutaneous wounds also proceeded normally in
transgenic mice with up to 300% of normal epidermal thrombomodulin
activity.14
Therefore, large differences in thrombomodulin
anticoagulant activity do not appear to have major consequences for
wound reepithelialization. Because homozygous deficiency of
thrombomodulin results in embryonic lethality in mice,17
however, it is still not known whether keratinocytes that lack
thrombomodulin completely can function normally during cutaneous wound
healing. To address this question, we examined cutaneous wound healing
in chimeric mice that were generated by injection of
TM-/- ES cells into blastoceles from C57BL/6 or ROSA 26
mice. The degree of chimerism, based on coat coloration, of
TM-/- chimeric mice varies between 40% and
80%.19
In unwounded skin, patchy epidermal staining for
ß-galactosidase was observed in TM-/- ROSA 26 chimeric
mice, which indicated that both TM+/+ and
TM-/- keratinocytes were present in the epidermis (not
shown). Like wounds in TM+/- and TMpro/-
mice, wounds in TM-/- chimeric mice exhibited a prominent
neoepidermis after 37 days of healing (Figure 4)
. In some TM-/- chimeric
mice, a majority of neoepidermal keratinocytes stained strongly for
thrombomodulin (Figure 4A)
, whereas in other TM-/-
chimeric mice there was a relative paucity of thrombomodulin-positive
keratinocytes in the neoepidermis (Figure 4B)
. In all
TM-/- chimeric mice, both thrombomodulin-positive and
thrombomodulin-negative keratinocytes were detected within the
stratified portion of the neoepidermis.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We had hypothesized that thrombomodulin might regulate wound reepithelialization through one of several potential mechanisms. First, thrombomodulin might inhibit the effects of thrombin on keratinocyte thrombin receptors such as PAR-1 or PAR-3,22 resulting in decreased thrombin-stimulated keratinocyte proliferation.23 Second, thrombomodulin might inhibit local thrombin generation, indirectly causing decreased thrombin-stimulated keratinocyte proliferation. Third, thrombomodulin might increase activation of TAFI,4 resulting in decreased generation of plasmin and a decreased rate of reepithelialization. Plasminogen is activated to plasmin during wound healing,24 and reepithelialization of cutaneous wounds is delayed in plasminogen-deficient mice.25 Fourth, the extracellular lectin-like domain of thrombomodulin, which has been proposed to function in cell-cell adhesion,26 might support keratinocyte adhesion during reepithelialization.
Because complete deficiency of thrombomodulin produces embryonic lethality in mice,17 we chose to examine effects of thrombomodulin on wound reepithelialization in mice with either moderate (TM+/-) or severe (TMpro/-) deficiency of thrombomodulin anticoagulant activity. TM+/- mice have an apparently normal phenotype under ambient conditions, but they are susceptible to increased deposition of cross-linked fibrin in response to hypoxia.27 TMpro/- mice exhibit a more severe thrombotic phenotype than TM+/- mice, with spontaneous deposition of fibrin in the heart, lung, and spleen.27 In contrast to these major effects of thrombomodulin deficiency on fibrin deposition, however, we found that reepithelialization of full-thickness cutaneous wounds proceeded normally in both TM+/- and TMpro/- mice. These results suggest that inhibition of thrombin by thrombomodulin is not a major mechanism of regulation of wound reepithelialization in mice. Our findings are consistent with a previous report of normal wound reepithelialization in mice lacking the major thrombin receptor PAR-1.28
One limitation of wound healing studies in TM+/- and TMpro/- mice is that, although these mice have decreased thrombomodulin anticoagulant activity, they still express approximately 50% of wild-type levels of thrombomodulin protein. Therefore, effects of thrombomodulin that may be independent of thrombin binding, such as potential effects of the amino-terminal lectin-like domain, cannot be assessed in these mice. To try to circumvent this problem, we also examined wound healing in TM-/- chimeric mice. We found that reepithelialization proceeded normally in TM-/- chimeric mice, and that both thrombomodulin-positive and thrombomodulin-negative keratinocytes were present within the neoepidermis. These observations indicate that keratinocytes that lack thrombomodulin completely can participate in normal reepithelialization. Because some thrombomodulin-positive keratinocytes were present in the chimeric mice, however, we cannot completely exclude the possibility that the lectin-like domain, or another thrombin-independent domain of thrombomodulin, is necessary for normal wound reepithelialization. This question could be addressed more definitively by generating animals with skin-specific deletion of the thrombomodulin gene.
Although we did not detect abnormalities of wound reepithelialization in thrombomodulin-deficient mice, we did observe foci of increased collagen deposition in TM+/- and TMpro/- mice. We speculate that increased deposition of collagen in these mice may have resulted from increased stimulation of wound fibroblasts by thrombin. Thrombins effects on wound fibroblasts may be regulated not only by thrombomodulin expressed in keratinocytes, but also by thrombomodulin expressed in endothelial cells within granulation tissue. Another potential mechanism for increased collagen deposition in thrombomodulin-deficient mice is decreased thrombomodulin-dependent activation of protein C. Like thrombomodulin expressed in endothelium, thrombomodulin expressed in keratinocytes is capable of promoting activation of protein C.11-15 In addition to its anticoagulant effects, activated protein C also has anti-inflammatory effects on monocytes and macrophages.29 Therefore, decreased activation of protein C could result in increased cytokine-mediated stimulation of collagen deposition by fibroblasts in the wound matrix.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health grants HL-07344 and DK-25295, and the Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust.
Accepted for publication July 7, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
: differential responses in keratinocytes and endothelial cells. Blood 1996, 88:2043-2049This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Roy, S. Khanna, C. Rink, S. Biswas, and C. K. Sen Characterization of the acute temporal changes in excisional murine cutaneous wound inflammation by screening of the wound-edge transcriptome Physiol Genomics, July 9, 2008; 34(2): 162 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Bagley, J. Walter-Yohrling, X. Cao, W. Weber, B. Simons, B. P. Cook, S. D. Chartrand, C. Wang, S. L. Madden, and B. A. Teicher Endothelial Precursor Cells As a Model of Tumor Endothelium: Characterization and Comparison with Mature Endothelial Cells Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5866 - 5873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Piette, S. R. Lentz, N. Kao, J. A. Hazelzet, E. D. de Kleijn, R. de Groot, S. N. Faust, R. S. Heyderman, and M. Levin Endothelial Protein C Activation in Meningococcal Sepsis N. Engl. J. Med., December 13, 2001; 345(24): 1776 - 1777. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |