| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |


From the Departments of Pathology*
and
Microbiology and Immunology,§
Albert Einstein
College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; the Department of
Immunology,
Berlex Biosciences, Richmond,
California; and the Departments of Neurology and Microbiology and
Immunology,
Kentucky Clinic L445, University
of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and MIP-1ß), serves primarily as
chemoattractants for monocytes and T cells. These proteins function
through binding of specific seven transmembrane domain spanning,
G-protein-coupled receptors. These receptors bind chemokines within
their family and the C-C chemokine receptor family is continually
growing with approximately 10 receptors identified. Chemokine receptor
binding within each family is somewhat promiscuous with MIP-1
binding CCR1 and CCR5, MIP-1ß binding CCR5, and MCP-1 using the CCR2
receptor. Both chemokines and their receptors have been shown to play
key roles in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and
progression. Several chemokine receptors are co-factors with CD4 for
the entry of HIV into host cells, the major receptors being CCR5 and
CXCR4.3-6
Chemokines have been shown to compete with HIV
for binding of chemokine receptors and as such may play a role in
controlling the spread of the virus within the host.7
A major complication of HIV infection,
particularly in children, is encephalitis with approximately one-third
of those infected with HIV developing HIV encephalitis and/or acquired
immune deficiency syndrome dementia complex.8
Although much is known about the role of chemokines and their receptors
in the pathogenesis of HIV infection, little is known of their role in
HIV infection of the central nervous system (CNS) and the neural
complications which result.9,10
Thus, it is critical to
determine the expression and regulation of chemokines and their
receptors in the CNS and how this is affected by HIV infection.
Chemokine receptors are expressed constitutively in the CNS whereas
chemokines are rarely detected in normal CNS but are highly expressed
during a variety of CNS pathologies. We and others have demonstrated
the expression of chemokines in the CNS in inflammatory pathologies
including MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, MCP-1, MCP-2, and
MCP-311-14
and several recent reports demonstrate the
expression of various chemokine receptors in the
CNS.9,15-18
CXCR4 has been shown to be expressed on
astrocytes, microglia, and neurons as has CCR5 in normal CNS (reviewed
in Ref. 19
). In this report, we analyze tissue sections from brains of
pediatric acquired immune deficiency syndrome patients, with and
without encephalitis, as well as aged-matched normal control tissue for
the expression of the C-C chemokines, MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, and MCP-1 and
the chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR4.
Microglia have been shown to be the primary productively infected cell type of the CNS8,20 whereas astrocyte infection, although reported, is controversial.21,22 Levels of virus in the CNS do not always correlate with neurological dysfunction and microglial activation is common in areas of the CNS where HIV antigen is not present.23 Thus, soluble factors released from HIV-infected cells may have effects on uninfected cells. Tat, an HIV transactivator protein, is secreted from HIV-infected cells24-26 by a leaderless pathway.27 Little is known about the in vivo effects of this extracellular protein, particularly within the CNS. However, a recent report by Jones and colleagues28 shows that intraventricular injection of Tat into male rats results in ventricular enlargement, apoptosis, and inflammation. Evidence for the expression of Tat within the CNS is reported29,30 and Tat has also been detected in the serum of patients infected with HIV.31 There is a growing literature on the in vitro effects of Tat. Tat has been shown to mimic certain properties of C-C chemokines32 and can up-regulate CXCR4 on resting CD4+ T cells.33 With regards to the CNS, data indicates that Tat induces cytokine and adhesion molecule expression by brain microvascular endothelial cells as well as glial cells.34-36 It has been reported to have potent neurotoxic effects27,37 and a recent report by Conant and colleagues38 showed that Tat can induce MCP-1 in astrocytes. For this study, we analyzed the effects of the HIV protein, Tat, on chemokine and chemokine receptor expression in human fetal astrocytes and microglia.
We have shown previously that astrocytes and microglia produce C-C chemokines in response to proinflammatory cytokines.39 Cytokines are major mediators of the inflammatory response serving to activate cells and mediate host responses. Chemokines are present in the local environment of the inflammatory response and studies indicate an essential role for chemokines in the establishment of this response because several studies have shown that blocking chemokine expression can ameliorate inflammatory disease.40,41 Chronic neurological dysfunction can result in part from a continuing inflammatory response. How this response is perpetuated is not clearly understood. We determined whether chemokines could act in an autocrine fashion to induce their own expression, and thus, play a role not only in the inflammatory response but also in the perpetuation of this response. We analyzed the pattern of expression of chemokines and the C-C chemokine receptors, CCR1-CCR5, in response to chemokine treatment of human fetal astrocytes and microglia and show a novel autocrine function for chemokines.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunocytochemical studies were performed on brain tissue taken at
autopsy. Seven pediatric patients with HIV encephalitis were studied
along with nonencephalitic brains from two patients with HIV infection
and three age-matched control brains (Table 1)
. Astroglioma tissue and lung tissue
from patients with pneumonia were used as positive controls because
these tissues are known to express high levels of chemokines.
|
Primary antibodies for use in immunohistochemistry were obtained
from the following sources: MCP-1, MIP-1
, and MIP-1ß were kindly
provided by Leukosite Inc. (Cambridge, MA). MCP-1 and MIP-1
are
purified monoclonal antibodies used at a concentration of 2.8 µg/ml
and MIP-1ß was an ascites used at a dilution of 1:250. All antibodies
were screened by Leukosite for reactivity to chemokines on
paraffin-embedded tissues. CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR4 antibodies were kindly
provided by Berlex Biosciences (San Francisco, CA) and used at a
concentration of 5 µg/ml. Isotype-matched antibodies, IgG1, IgG2a,
and IgG2b were purchased from Cappel (Durham, NC) and used as a
negative control at a concentration of 2.8 µg/ml.
Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded tissue was dehydrated in graded alcohol baths and then deparaffinized in xylene. After rehydration the sections were quenched for 20 minutes in 0.8% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Sections were then incubated in 2% normal horse serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C in primary antibody. The sections were washed and incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody (1:750; Vector Laboratories) followed by incubation in avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (Vector Laboratories). The slides were developed with 3'3'-diaminobenzidene to give a brown reaction product (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and then dehydrated and mounted with Cytoseal (VWR, Boston, MA).
Immunoelution of Tat
Protein A agarose beads were pelleted and washed and purified rabbit anti-Tat (1:50 dilution) was added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing, Tat was added at the treatment concentration for 1 hour at room temperature. After centrifugation, the supernatant was used in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) studies.
Cell Culture and Reagents
Human fetal CNS tissue (20 to 23 weeks) was obtained at the time
of elective termination of intrauterine pregnancy from otherwise
healthy females. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
This tissue was used as part of an ongoing research protocol that has
been approved by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Committee
on Clinical Investigation and the City of New York Health and Hospitals
Corporation. Microglia and astrocyte cultures were prepared as
previously described.39,42
Briefly, tissue was dissociated
and incubated for 45 minutes at 37°C in 1x Hanks balanced
salt solution (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), 1x
trypsin (Life Technologies, Inc.), and DNase 1
(Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis IN). Tissue fragments were
passed through 250- and 150-µm nylon mesh (Tetko, Inc., Briar Cliff
Manor, NY). Cells were washed and resuspended in complete Dulbeccos
modified Eagles medium (25 mmol/L HEPES, 10% fetal
calf serum, 1% nonessential amino acids, and 1%
penicillin-streptomycin) and rewashed. Cells were seeded at 1.2 x
108
cells per 150-cm2
tissue-culture flask (Falcon; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and
cultured for 12 days. Microglial cells were then removed from the mixed
culture by shaking for 30 minutes at 4°C and plated in
complete Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium at a concentration
of 1 x 106
cells per
20-cm2
tissue-culture plate (Falcon). Cells were
analyzed for the purity of the culture and shown to be
95% HAM56 (a
microglial marker) positive. Astrocytes, the adherent population
remaining in the 150-cm2
flask, were placed in
RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal calf serum and 1%
penicillin-streptomycin. These cells were then passaged several times
and allowed to grow to confluency. The astrocyte cultures were
95%
GFAP-positive (an astrocyte marker). Cells were treated with human
recombinant MIP-1
, MIP-1ß at 1 to 100 ng/ml (R&D Systems),
MCP-1 at 1 to 100 ng/ml (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), or HIV Tat protein
at 1 to 100 ng/ml (prepared as previously described43
).
Briefly, the recombinant Tat was prepared by expressing the
tat gene encoding amino acids 1 to 72 (first exon) as a
fusion protein in Escherichia coli DH5
f1Q (Life
Technologies, Inc.) and purifying it with a metal chelate affinity
column. Tat was diluted with the following buffer before use: 50
mmol/L Tris, pH 8.0; 100 mmol/L NaCl; 1 mmol/L
CaCl2; 0.5 mmol/L dithiothreitol. Endotoxin
levels for all of the chemokines and the Tat were <1 ng/ml as tested
by Limulus assay (BioWhitaker, Walkersville, MD). To accurately reflect
donor variation each donor is reported as a separate symbol in all
figures. Cell numbers obtained from each donor also varied due to
tissue sample size and cell recovery, accounting for differences in
numbers of untreated versus treated conditions.
RNA Extraction and RNase Protection Assay
Total RNA was extracted from microglial cultures using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH). Probe cocktails of C-C chemokines (panel CR5), C-C chemokine receptors (panel CK5), and C-X-C chemokine receptors (panel CR6) were obtained from Pharmingen. Ambion Maxiscript kit was used according to manufacturers instruction for the generation of the RNA probes and the Ambion RPA II kit was used according to manufacturers instructions for the analysis of mRNA expression. Samples were analyzed by 5% denaturing acrylamide gels followed by autoradiography (Fischer, Springfield, NJ). Densitometry was performed on multiple film exposures using densitometric software (NIH Shareware).
Chemokine ELISA
Supernatants from microglial cell cultures were analyzed for
chemokine proteins. Matched antibody pairs for MIP-1
and MIP-1ß
were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) for use in sandwich
ELISA. Antibody pairs for MCP-1 were purchased from Pharmingen.
Ninety-six well plates were coated with chemokine antibody at a
concentration of 4 µg/ml in 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at
4°C overnight. Plates were then washed with 1x PBS with 0.005%
Tween-20 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and blocked with 1% bovine serum
albumin in PBS. Samples were then added to the plate and a standard
curve was generated using a series of dilutions from 2000 pg/ml to
31.25 pg/ml of the appropriate recombinant human chemokine (MIP-1
,
MIP-1ß, R&D Systems; MCP-1, Pharmingen). Samples and standards were
allowed to incubate overnight at 4°C. Plates were then washed again
and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with specific biotinylated
secondary antibody, washed, and incubated for 30 minutes in
avidin-peroxidase (Sigma). The plates were washed, TMB (KPL,
Gaithersburg, MD) substrate added for 5 minutes or less and the
reaction stopped with 1 mol/L phosphoric acid. Absorbance was read at
450-nm wavelength on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad) within 30 minutes of
stopping the reaction.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical significance for microglia and astrocyte chemokine
protein expression was determined using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
This test is nonparametric and as such analyzes each experimental group
individually, allowing for an accurate measurement of variability in
chemokine induction. This test does not generate error bars because the
P value is not based on the means of pooled experiments.
Individual points are represented in the graphs to illustrate the
variability between experiments. Densitometric results of the RNase
protection assays were analyzed using the students paired
t-test. Significance, with both analyses, was assigned for
P
0.05 (StatView; Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, MIP-1ß, and MCP-1
Expression
Staining of pediatric tissues showed that chemokines are highly
expressed in the brains of children with HIV encephalitis but are not
constitutively expressed in the brains of children with non-CNS-related
pathologies. Figure 1A
shows MIP-1
staining of a highly
encephalitogenic case of HIV encephalitis where immunoreactivity is
noted in the parenchyma by glial cells. Figure 1B
, an age-matched
control tissue with non-CNS-related pathologies, is negative for
MIP-1
staining and is representative of staining of normal tissue
with MIP-1ß (data not shown). Figures 1C and 1D
illustrate MIP-1ß
expression in HIV encephalitis particularly around blood vessels by
glial cells and perivascular mononuclear cells (Figure 1D)
and in the
nonvessel-associated white matter (Figure 1C)
. Staining for MIP-1ß is
intense on astrocytes as well as microglia and, similar to MIP-1
,
staining is seen on mononuclear cells infiltrating the CNS. MCP-1 is
expressed by astrocytes, microglia, and mononuclear cells as well as on
the endothelium (Figure 1, E and F)
. Figure 1G
illustrates the lack of
MCP-1 immunoreactivity in age-matched control tissue. Figure 1H
is an
isotype-specific negative control reagent that is nonreactive in the
tissues analyzed and is representative of all isotype-matched controls.
A summary of the immunohistochemical results is shown in Table 2
.
|
|
Analyses of chemokine receptor expression in pediatric HIV
encephalitis demonstrated that the expression of these receptors is not
always restricted to disease states, in that some of the receptors were
also expressed in normal brains. CCR2 was not detected in the
parenchyma of normal brains (Figure 2B)
, although it was
expressed on glial cells and peripheral mononuclear cells within
vessels in HIV encephalitis (Figure 2A)
. This differs from what was
seen with CCR5 and CXCR4 which were present in both normal (Figure 2, D and F)
and HIV encephalitogenic brains (Figure 2, C and E)
. This
correlates with recent data showing immunoreactivity for CCR5 by glial
cells and mononuclear cells with staining being more intense in the
encephalitic cases.16
Anti-CXCR4 stained neurons as well
as glial cells and mononuclear cells in encephalitogenic brains and in
normal brains (Figure 2, E and F)
, again with more intense staining
noted in the encephalitic brains which confirms previous data by Vallat
et al.16
Most of the sections analyzed were from the
cortex and cerebellum. There were variations in the intensity of
staining observed with both chemokines and chemokine receptors between
different individuals, and the areas of tissue chosen for illustration
are most representative of the intensity of staining seen.
|
Recent reports suggest an important role for Tat in modulating the cellular activation of glial cells and in contributing to the pathogenesis of HIV encephalitis. Much of the damage seen in HIV encephalitis may not be correlated with viral load and thus may be mediated by HIV proteins, such as Tat, which are secreted by HIV-infected cells. We examined the effects of Tat on chemokine and chemokine receptor expression in the CNS.
O-RNase Protection Assay (RPA) analysis shows induction of
MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, and MCP-1 mRNA after treatment with Tat (10 ng/ml)
(n = 3; data not shown). Treatment of microglia
for 24 hours with varying doses of Tat results in significant
up-regulation of both MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, and MCP-1 protein (Figure 3, AC)
as measured by ELISA. This
induction is dose-dependent with MIP-1
and MIP-1ß showing
induction at 10 ng/ml and 50 ng/ml, with significant induction being
reached after 100 ng/ml Tat treatment (P
0.05). Tat induced higher levels of MIP-1
than MIP-1ß (note ng/ml
scale in Figure 3, A and B
). MCP-1 is constitutively expressed and as
seen previously with cytokine induction, induced to higher levels than
MIP-1
or MIP-1ß.39
MCP-1 is regulated differently
from MIP-1
and MIP-1ß in that it is significantly induced at all
doses analyzed after 24 hours of treatment (P
0.05). The Tat-induced expression of MCP-1, MIP-1
, and MIP-1ß was
completely abrogated by immunoelution of Tat with polyclonal-Tat
antibody (1:50) coupled to agarose beads. In these experiments
chemokine levels were reduced to <3 ng/ml for MCP-1 and to <1 ng/ml
for both MIP-1
and MIP-1ß (n = 2).
|
0.05; see Figure 4B
and MIP-1ß in astrocytes. Analysis of astrocytes did not
reveal the expression of MIP-1
or MIP-1ß by astrocytes in response
to a variety of cytokines (data not shown). This is in contrast to data
showing induction of MIP-1
by treatment with combinations of
proinflammatory cytokines.44
Tat treatment (100 ng/ml) of
astrocytes did result in detectable expression of these chemokines at
the picogram level which was not statistically significant (Figure 4A)
and MIP-1ß mRNA were
barely detectable (n = 2; data not shown).
|
|
Our previous results showing chemokine production by glial cells in response to cytokines and other factors such as lipopolysaccharide39 and in this report, Tat, indicate elements that could result in the induction of chemokines in vivo. Chemokine induction during an inflammatory response would result in the presence of chemokines in the local environment. Thus, we analyzed the ability of chemokines to induce their own production. The ability of chemokines to self-regulate would be a mechanism by which, after initial induction, chemokine levels could remain elevated and contribute to the maintenance of the inflammatory response.
We show that chemokines can induce their own production in human fetal
microglia (Figure 6)
. RPA analysis of
chemokine expression after treatment with MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, or MCP-1
at 10 ng/ml for 24 hours shows that MIP-1
and MIP-1ß induce
themselves as well as MCP-1 (n
3; data not
shown). Protein expression of the chemokines correlated with RPA
analysis. It should be noted that the MIP-1
protein expression
measured after MIP-1
treatment or MIP-1ß protein after MIP-1ß
treatment is the actual amount induced by treatment. The 10 ng/ml
of protein used for treatment is subtracted giving the final numbers
seen in the graphs for Figure 6
. Figure 6A and 6B
illustrate
significant induction of MIP-1
and MIP-1ß, respectively, after
treatment with either chemokine (10 ng/ml) after 24 hours
(n = 6; P
0.05). In addition,
these chemokines significantly induce the expression of MCP-1 after 24
hours (P
0.05; Figure 6C
). Interestingly, a
time course study of these chemokines shows MIP-1
and MIP-1ß do
not significantly induce chemokines after 6 hours of treatment, but
that levels remain significantly elevated after 48 hours of treatment
(data not shown). MCP-1 was also analyzed for its ability to induce
chemokine expression and does not induce expression of any chemokine
tested as analyzed by RPA and ELISA analysis (data not shown).
|
and MIP-1ß to induce MIP-1
,
MIP-1ß, and MCP-1 after 100 ng/ml treatment for 6 hours
(n = 3; Figure 7A
and MIP-1ß (Figure 7, B and C)
induction of MIP-1
protein or MIP-1ß induction of
MIP-1ß. It is, however, clearly illustrated by the RPA in Figure 7A
treatment of astrocytes at 100 ng/ml does induce MIP-
production. The same is seen with MIP-1ß expression after treatment
with MIP-1ß.
|
induced MIP-1ß and MCP-1 significantly at
100 ng/ml treatment for 24 hours and MIP-1ß significantly induced
MIP-1
and MCP-1 at 100 ng/ml treatment for 24 hours
(P
0.05; n = 7; Figure 7, B and D
induces MIP-1ß significantly after 6 hours of treatment but that this
does not remain elevated after 48 hours in the presence of MIP-1
(data not shown). The opposite is seen with induction of MIP-1
,
where MIP-1ß does not significantly induce its expression by 6 hours
but protein levels are still significantly elevated at 48 hours,
although less than what is seen at 24 hours (data not shown). MCP-1 is
significantly induced by MIP-1
at 6 hours, but not by MIP-1ß, and
MCP-1 remains significantly induced by both treatments after 48 hours
(data not shown). As was noted for microglia, MCP-1 did not have the
ability to induce chemokine expression in astrocytes (data not shown).
Treatment of microglia with chemokines did not result in significant
effects on chemokine receptor mRNA expression (data not shown). This
was measured by densitometric analysis of RPAs
(n = 2 for MCP-1; n = 3
MIP-1
, MIP-1ß). In addition, there were no effects measured on
astrocyte receptor expression after chemokine treatment (data not
shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of chemokines and chemokine receptors in the CNS, particularly with regards to HIV encephalitis, is still not clearly defined. The expression of chemokines and their receptors could be a consequence of the inflammation, as we have previously shown chemokines to also be highly expressed in the brains of patients with multiple sclerosis, an inflammatory autoimmune disease of the CNS.11,12 However, this could also be a protective host response to try to contain the spread of virus within the CNS where excess chemokine production could compete with the virus for receptor binding. It is necessary to understand the complex interplay of chemokines with receptors and what cellular events, ie, signal transduction and gene regulation, occur when receptors are ligated or when cells are exposed to HIV proteins or infected with HIV.
Numerous studies have been performed to understand the relationship of
HIV infection of the brain and neurological dysfunction. No clear
correlation exists between the amount of viral load in the CNS and an
individuals likelihood of having HIV encephalitis.23
Thus, it was proposed that HIV products could participate in the
sequelae leading to CNS pathology. Tat is an HIV transactivator protein
that is released from HIV-infected cells.34
It has been
detected in the CNS of individuals infected with HIV, suggesting it to
be a possible mediator of damage to the CNS.29
In
vivo support for this hypothesis has come from a report showing
intraventricular injection of Tat into male rats results in
perivascular infiltration of mononuclear cells, gliosis, and
apoptosis.28
Additionally, Tat has been detected in the
serum of HIV-infected patients.31
There are several
reports on the in vitro effects of Tat. Tat induces MCP-1
expression in astrocytes and in addition, in patients with acquired
immune deficiency syndrome dementia, MCP-1 is present in the brain and
is elevated in the CSF.38,45
Tat has also been shown to
up-regulate CXCR4 on the surface of resting CD4+ T33
cells and to mimic the ß-chemokines MCP-1, MCP-3,
and eotaxin in their interactions with CCR2 and
CCR3.32
Tat can also induce expression of tumor necrosis
factor-
(TNF-
) in macrophages and astrocytes as well as infected
T cells.46,47
We and others have shown TNF-
to induce
chemokine expression in various CNS cells.48,49
This
indicates that the effects of Tat on chemokine production may be a
secondary response of the cell as a result of Tat induction of TNF-
or other cytokines.36,50
Tat also induces apoptotic cell
death in primary human neuronal cultures37,50
and
activates MAP kinase in granular neurons and astrocytes in the rat
cerebellum.51
It induces interleukin-6 in human brain
endothelial cells as well as increases adhesion molecule
expression.35,36
In the astrocytic cell line, U-87MG,
treatment with Tat leads to increases in HIV-1 gene
expression.35
Astrocytes, despite their inability to
produce significant amounts of virus, do produce functional Tat and Rev
proteins but not several other key proteins.52
They
suggest that the production of Tat and Rev by astrocytes could
contribute to HIV-1 neuropathogenesis. Tat can therefore be produced by
both astrocytes and microglia and have potentially widespread effects
within the CNS. In this study Tat induced MIP-1
and MIP-1ß in
astrocytes, but this induction is not statistically significant;
however, MCP-1 expression by astrocytes is significantly induced by
Tat. Tat also has potent effects on microglia, from which it
significantly induces MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, and MCP-1. It will be
important to analyze the role of Tat in the contest of viral infection
in our culture system and to determine whether Tat functions similarly
in the presence of other viral factors. Thus, we are currently
determining the in vivo effects of Tat on chemokine and
chemokine receptor expression in the CNS.
Our data demonstrate an autocrine pathway of induction for chemokines. Chemokine autocrine regulation builds on our previous data showing that lipopolysaccharide as well as proinflammatory cytokines can induce chemokines in human fetal microglia as well as astrocytes.39,49 During an inflammatory response the initial insult may elicit a cascade of cytokines and other cellular factors that may induce chemokines. In more chronic inflammation, high levels of chemokines may facilitate positive-feedback loop-signaling cells to continue producing chemokines, thus perpetuating the inflammatory response. In HIV infection of the CNS, it is possible Tat plays a role in initiating a cascade that results in chemokine autocrine regulation. It is known that HIV-infected individuals who are long-term nonprogressors have elevated levels of circulating chemokines53,54 and perhaps use this autocrine action of chemokines to maintain such elevated levels.
It is interesting that treatment of microglia with chemokines or Tat
does not alter the message levels of their receptors. However, it may
be that there are posttranslational alterations. It will be interesting
to determine whether there are changes in receptor expression at the
surface, ie, internalization or desensitization, whether or not there
is a Ca2+ flux, and what signal transduction
events mediate this phenomenon. Our finding on the expression of
chemokine receptors by astrocytes is also intriguing. We find
expression of C-C chemokine receptors on astrocytes by
immunohistochemistry. In addition, the fact that the astrocytes are
responding to chemokines, indicates that there is a receptor on the
surface of the cells that recognizes MIP-1
and MIP-1ß. We and
others15
have detected the expression of CCR5 in
astrocytes by immunohistochemistry and by fluorescence-activated cell
sorting (FACS) analysis but there has been no corresponding mRNA
data. The lack of expression of specific RNA transcripts for any of the
C-C receptors discussed here would suggest that they do not express C-C
receptors, CCR15. The immunohistochemical and FACS data showing
positive staining for CCR5 may indicate cross-reactivity of this
antibody for a similar and as yet unidentified receptor on the surface
of astrocytes.
The presence of Tat, chemokines, and chemokine receptors in the CNS of patients with HIV encephalitis may result in the inhibition or propagation of the encephalitic process due to interactions among these factors. Further studies both in vitro and in vivo are necessary to delineate the precise role of these factors in the pathogenesis of HIV encephalitis. In addition, the ability of chemokines to act as autocrine regulators of the local environment of the inflammatory reaction should be considered in the development of therapeutics to either ameliorate or enhance the inflammatory response.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant MH52974 and National Institutes of Health grants NS11920 and AG0019410.
Accepted for publication November 28, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, MIP-1ß receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science 1996, 272:1955-1958[Abstract]
, and MIP-1ß as the major HIV suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells. Science 1995, 270:1811-1815This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. B. Butchi, S. Pourciau, M. Du, T. W. Morgan, and K. E. Peterson Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory Response to TLR7 Stimulation in the Brain: Comparison of Multiple TLR7 and/or TLR8 Agonists J. Immunol., June 1, 2008; 180(11): 7604 - 7612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Benamar, E. B. Geller, and M. W. Adler First in Vivo Evidence for a Functional Interaction between Chemokine and Cannabinoid Systems in the Brain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2008; 325(2): 641 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Roc, B. M. Ances, S. Chawla, M. Korczykowski, R. L. Wolf, D. L. Kolson, J. A. Detre, and H. Poptani Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Induced Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Lenticular Nuclei With Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Despite Antiretroviral Therapy Arch Neurol, September 1, 2007; 64(9): 1249 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-T. Choi, M. Kaul, S. Kumar, J. Wang, I. M. K. Kumar, C.-Z. Dong, J. An, S. A. Lipton, and Z. Huang Neuronal Apoptotic Signaling Pathways Probed and Intervened by Synthetically and Modularly Modified (SMM) Chemokines J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2007; 282(10): 7154 - 7163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Eugenin, J. E. King, A. Nath, T. M. Calderon, R. S. Zukin, M. V. L. Bennett, and J. W. Berman HIV-tat induces formation of an LRP-PSD-95- NMDAR-nNOS complex that promotes apoptosis in neurons and astrocytes PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3438 - 3443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rumbaugh, J. Turchan-Cholewo, D. Galey, C. St. Hillaire, C. Anderson, K. Conant, and A. Nath Interaction of HIV Tat and matrix metalloproteinase in HIV neuropathogenesis: a new host defense mechanism FASEB J, August 1, 2006; 20(10): 1736 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sun, T. Soos, V. N. KewalRamani, K. Osiecki, J. H. Zheng, L. Falkin, L. Santambrogio, D. R. Littman, and H. Goldstein CD4-Specific Transgenic Expression of Human Cyclin T1 Markedly Increases Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Production by CD4+ T Lymphocytes and Myeloid Cells in Mice Transgenic for a Provirus Encoding a Monocyte-Tropic HIV-1 Isolate J. Virol., February 15, 2006; 80(4): 1850 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Eugenin, K. Osiecki, L. Lopez, H. Goldstein, T. M. Calderon, and J. W. Berman CCL2/Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Mediates Enhanced Transmigration of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Leukocytes across the Blood-Brain Barrier: A Potential Mechanism of HIV-CNS Invasion and NeuroAIDS J. Neurosci., January 25, 2006; 26(4): 1098 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nardacci, A. Antinori, L. M. Larocca, V. Arena, A. Amendola, J.-L. Perfettini, G. Kroemer, and M. Piacentini Characterization of Cell Death Pathways in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Encephalitis Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2005; 167(3): 695 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Carbonell, S.-I. Murase, A. F. Horwitz, and J. W. Mandell Migration of Perilesional Microglia after Focal Brain Injury and Modulation by CC Chemokine Receptor 5: An In Situ Time-Lapse Confocal Imaging Study J. Neurosci., July 27, 2005; 25(30): 7040 - 7047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Day, M. A. Marshall, L. Huang, M. J. McDuffie, M. D. Okusa, and J. Linden Protection from ischemic liver injury by activation of A2A adenosine receptors during reperfusion: inhibition of chemokine induction Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): G285 - G293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Tarzami, W. Miao, K. Mani, L. Lopez, S. M. Factor, J. W. Berman, and R. N. Kitsis Opposing Effects Mediated by the Chemokine Receptor CXCR2 on Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Recruitment of Potentially Damaging Neutrophil |