help button home button Am J Pathol R & D Systems
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diaz-Granados, N.
Right arrow Articles by McKay, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diaz-Granados, N.
Right arrow Articles by McKay, D. M.
(American Journal of Pathology. 2000;156:2169-2177.)
© 2000 American Society for Investigative Pathology


Regular Articles

Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colonic Histopathology, but not Altered Epithelial Ion Transport, Is Reduced by Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase Activity

Natalia Diaz-Granados, Kathryn Howe, Jun Lu and Derek M. McKay

From the Intestinal Disease Research Programme, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity is beneficial in models of arthritis and airway inflammation. Here we assessed the ability of PDE inhibitors to modulate colitis by exposing mice to 4% (w/v) dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) drinking water for 5 days with or without rolipram, an inhibitor of PDE type 4, or the nonselective PDE inhibitor, pentoxifylline (both at 5 mg/kg, i.p., twice daily). Controls received saline, vehicle, or drug only. Colonic histology, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) levels, and epithelial ion transport (baseline and stimulated by electrical nerve stimulation, carbachol, and forskolin) were examined. DSS-treated mice displayed a variable diarrhea, significant histopathology in the mid-distal colon, elevated MPO activity, and reduced (>50%) responses to all three pro-secretory stimuli. Treatment with rolipram, and to a lesser extent pentoxifylline, significantly reduced the severity of the colonic histopathology and MPO levels. Neither PDE inhibitor had any affect on the diminished ion transport events caused by DSS-induced colitis. However, although stimulated ion transport events were still reduced 3 days after DSS treatment, colonic segments from DSS + rolipram-treated mice displayed enhanced recovery in their secretory responsiveness, particularly to carbachol. These findings indicate that specific PDE4 inhibition can significantly reduce the tissue damage that accompanies colitis and enhance recovery of normal colonic function.



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generally elevations in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in immune cells have been found to be immunosuppressive.1 For instance, increased macrophage cAMP has been associated with a reduced capacity to produce TNF-{alpha} on stimulation with bacterial endotoxin.2 cAMP is hydrolyzed to the inactive 5'AMP form by members of a superfamily of enzymes, the phosphodiesterases (PDE), of which type 4 (PDE4) is the predominant form in immune cells.1,3,4 Thus, inhibition of PDE activity that would result in maintained elevation of cAMP levels in immune cells presents itself as a potential anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive strategy.5,6

In fact, numerous in vitro studies have documented that nonselective PDE, or specific PDE4 inhibitors, down-regulate the activity of most types of immune cells, including T-cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and mast cells.1,3 Similarly, PDE inhibitors have been found to be beneficial in animal models of airway or joint inflammation.7,8 In the latter scenario, it was suggested that the amelioration of collagen-induced arthritis in mice by the PDE4 inhibitor, rolipram (ROL), was because of suppression of TNF-{alpha} production. In this context, it is noteworthy that neutralizing TNF-{alpha} antibodies are an effective short-term treatment for a cohort of steroid-resistant patients with Crohn’s disease.9 However, the ability of inhibitors of PDE activity to alleviate either the functional abnormalities or histopathology associated with enteric inflammation has not been extensively examined.

Oral administration of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to rodents results in overt inflammation in the mid-distal colon that is somewhat reminiscent of human inflammatory bowel disease. Exposure to DSS leads to a time- and dose-dependent drop in body weight, a variable watery/bloody diarrhea, and can result in rectal prolapse and fatality.10,11 A number of approaches have been used to reduce the severity of DSS-induced histopathology in the colon, such as treatment with ICAM-1 anti-sense oligonucleotides,12 recombinant IL-10,13 inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase or neutrophil activity,14,15 and neutralization of TNF-{alpha}.16 However, considerably fewer studies have examined changes in colonic physiology as a consequence of exposure to DSS.

The present study was designed to compare the capacities of the nonselective PDE inhibitor, pentoxifylline (PTX), and the PDE4 inhibitor, ROL, to affect gut inflammation as judged by both structure and epithelial ion transport in the DSS model of murine colitis. The data show that concomitant twice-daily treatment with ROL, and to a lesser extent PTX, significantly reduced the severity of the colonic histopathology induced by a 5-day course of DSS drinking water. However, the disrupted epithelial ion transport apparent at the end of the DSS-treatment period was not affected by either inhibitor of PDE activity.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and Experimental Treatment

Male BALB/c mice (6 to 8 weeks old) were purchased from Harlan Animal Suppliers (Indianapolis, IN) and were housed under conventional conditions with free access to animal chow and water. For the induction of colitis, normal drinking water was replaced with a 4% (w/v) solution of DSS (molecular weight, 40 kd; ICN Biomedicals Inc., Aurora, OH) for 5 days.17 PTX or ROL (both from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) were administered twice daily, intraperitoneally (i.p.) at a dose of 5 mg/kg body weight in 200 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) beginning on the day of DSS exposure.7,8,18,19 Pilot studies examined the effect of a single daily injection of ROL at the same dose. Time-matched controls consisted of naïve mice, mice administered DSS, ROL, or PTX only, and those injected with ethanol (10 µl in 190 µl of PBS) only, the vehicle for ROL. All experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee at McMaster University.

Macroscopic Assessment

Animals were weighed and their behavior observed daily. On day 5, water intake was recorded (expressed as ml/day/mouse), mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the entire colon (from ileocecal junction to the anus) was excised. Colon length was measured and observations regarding ulceration, vascularization, and stool consistency were recorded (Table 1) . Previous studies have shown colonic shortening during colitis,10 and so the colon was divided based on total length: the mid-distal portion (ie, 30 to 60% region) was used for electrophysiology studies; the adjacent distal 10% was fixed for histological examination; and the remainder of the tissue was snap-frozen in liquid N2 before processing for myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity or TNF-{alpha} levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Macroscopic Assessment of Animals

 
Histology

Tissue was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, dehydrated, and wax-embedded. Five-µm sections were collected on coded slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and scored in a blinded fashion by two investigators. Histological damage was scored using the criteria of Appleyard and Wallace20 which considers loss of mucosal architecture, cellular infiltration, muscle thickening, crypt abscess formation, and goblet cell depletion (maximum score = 11).

MPO Activity

MPO activity was determined following a published protocol.21 Briefly, tissue samples were weighed and suspended in 50 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 5 mg/ml hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (Sigma Chemical Co.) at a ratio of 50 mg tissue to 1 ml of buffer. Tissues were homogenized by a polytron tissue homogenizer for 15 seconds, and 1 ml was decanted into sterile Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes. Using a microtiter plate scanner, 200 µl of the reaction mixture (containing 16.7 mg of o-dianisidine (Sigma Chemical Co.), 90 ml of distilled H2O, 10 ml of potassium-phosphate buffer, and 50 µl of 1% H2O2) was added to each well containing 7 µl of sample in a standard 96-well plate and three absorbance readings at 30-second intervals at 450 nm were recorded. MPO activity was measured in units/mg tissue, where one unit of MPO was defined as the amount needed to degrade 1 µmol of H2O2 per minute at room temperature.

Functional Studies

Epithelial ion transport was examined in colonic segments (approximately mid-distal colon) mounted in Ussing chambers.22 Tissues (surface area = 0.6 cm2) were bathed in 10 ml of warm (37°C), oxygenated Krebs buffer (pH 7.35 ± 0.02). The spontaneous potential difference was maintained at 0 mV by an automated voltage clamp (WPI, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), and the short-circuit current (Isc in µA/cm2) was continuously measured as an indicator of net active ion transport. At 15-minute intervals, tissue conductance (G; indicates barrier to passive ion flow) was calculated from Isc and potential difference values.

Stimulated ion transport events were sequentially evoked by: 1) electrical transmural stimulation (10 Hz, 10 mA, 0.5 ms for a total time of 5 seconds); 2) addition of the cholinergic agonist, carbachol (10-4 mol/L; Sigma Chemical Co.) to the serosal buffer; and 3) addition of the adenylate cyclase-activating agent, forskolin (10-5 mol/L; Sigma Chemical Co.) to the serosal buffer.23 In all instances, the effect of the treatment was recorded as the maximum change in Isc (ie, {Delta}Isc) to occur within 5 minutes.

Cytokine Production

At the end of the DSS-treatment period, blood was collected for determination of serum TNF-{alpha} levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using paired antibodies from PharMingen Inc. (detection limit 32 pg/ml; Mississauga, Canada). Portions of terminal colon were homogenized in PBS containing 2 mmol/L of phenyl-methyl sulfonyl fluoride (Sigma Chemical Co.) and tissue levels of TNF-{alpha} were measured. All cytokine determinations were performed in duplicate serial dilutions.

In Vitro Analysis of DSS Epithelial Toxicity

The murine IEC-4.1 epithelial cell line was seeded in 12-well sterile plates (106 cells/well) and grown for 24 hours under standard culture conditions24 and then exposed to 1% or 2% DSS ± ROL (10-6 mol/L). Twenty hours later the enterocytes were retrieved by addition of trypsin/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and cell viability determined using the trypan blue (0.04% w/v) dye exclusion technique. In another set of experiments, enterocytes were seeded into 96-well plates (3.5 x 104 cells/well) and 24 hours later were exposed to 1% or 2% DSS ± ROL for 20 hours. Subsequently each well was pulsed with 50 µg of MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide; Sigma Chemical Co.) for 5.5 hours followed by the addition of 50 µl of 10% (v/v) Triton-X 100/0.5 mol/L HCl and a 24-hour incubation in the dark. Optical density was measured at 540 nm.25

Recovery Experiments

In a final series of experiments, mice were exposed to 4% DSS for 5 days with or without daily ROL (5 mg/kg, twice daily). Subsequently, the animals received normal drinking water for 3 days (ROL was not administered during this period), and were then autopsied and the colonic form and function were assessed.

Analysis and Data Presentation

All data are expressed as means ± SEM (SEM), where n refers to the number of mice in each experiment. Data were compared using one-way analysis of variance (WINKS software by Texsoft, Cedarhill, TX) and P < 0.05 was accepted as the level of statistically significant difference compared to time-matched controls.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Colons from mice treated with PBS, ethanol, ROL, or PTX only (n = 3 per group) were not significantly different for any parameter examined, and so PBS-injected mice were subsequently used as time-matched controls throughout the study. Mice treated with ROL, independent of DSS exposure, displayed a hind-end paralysis within 5 minutes of injection that lasted 10 to 20 minutes and thereafter the mice had normal ambulatory behavior. This paralysis is consistent with effects on neuronal PDEs. This effect was not observed in ethanol- or PTX-treated mice. Addition of DSS (4% w/v) to the water did not significantly alter animal daily water intake. In five separate experiments mice treated with ROL, once or twice daily, consumed less DSS/water (range, 4 to 28% reduction) than controls, although PTX therapy did not affect daily water intake (Figure 1) . However, the beneficial effect of ROL (twice daily) described below is unlikely to be because of the reduced DSS intake because mice receiving ROL once a day developed a colitis virtually indistinguishable from that in the DSS-positive control group, despite their reduced DSS water intake (ie, histopathology damage scores were not significantly different when DSS and DSS + ROL, once a day, were compared).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Bar chart showing average daily DSS water intake as a percentage of normal water intake in time-matched control mice. DSS, 4% (w/v) for 5 days; ROL, given i.p. at 5 mg/kg (ie, 100 µg/mouse) once or twice daily (twice daily); PTX, given i.p. at 5 mg/kg (ie, 100 µg/mouse) twice daily. Mean values of 3 to 5 separate experiments with 3 to 4 mice per group in each experiment; means ± SEM; *, P < 0.05 compared to control.

 
Macroscopic Assessment

After 5 days of ad libitum exposure to 4% DSS many of the mice displayed clinical and macroscopic signs of inflammation and/or gut dysfunction. The distal two-thirds of the colon of DSS-treated mice was consistently devoid of contents, whereas the colon of DSS + ROL-treated mice typically contained loosely formed stool. Table 1 shows that all animals receiving DSS, independent of PDE treatment displayed some signs of diarrhea or perturbed water balance; however, luminal fluid content was not quantified. Typical of other colitidies, the DSS-treated animals had a significantly shortened colon, which was partially prevented by ROL and PTX (Table 1) . In addition, DSS treatment resulted in a significant drop in body weight that was not abrogated by PTX and was exaggerated by concomitant ROL therapy (Table 1) . This additional drop in body weight may be a consequence of the reduced water intake in this group of mice.

Histology

Figure 2, a and b , shows normal colonic structure and that ROL treatment (twice daily) did not alter colonic architecture, respectively. Colitis evoked by DSS was characterized by severe disruption of tissue architecture, edema, a massive mixed immune cell infiltrate (mononuclear cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils), ulceration and significant areas of complete epithelial denudation, and muscle thickening (Figure 2c) . Mice treated with ROL once daily along with DSS experienced the same fate as those in the DSS only group (data not shown). However, animals treated with ROL twice daily showed a significant improvement in colonic histology, ranging from an appearance virtually indistinguishable from control tissue, to colons showing a mild immune cell infiltrate (Figure 2d) , and those showing small foci of architectural destruction. Comparison of the tissue damage scores showed that colons from DSS-treated mice had scores in the range of 5 to 11 (11 is maximum), whereas 11 of 12 animals in the DSS + ROL (twice daily) group had scores of <5; colon from the remaining animal in this group had a damage score of 5 (Figure 3) . This reduction in colonic damage is complemented by the reduction in the number of mice displaying evidence of colonic/rectal bleeding (Table 1) . Mice treated with DSS + PTX displayed an improvement in colonic histopathology compared to DSS-only mice, but there were still clear signs of edema, inflammatory infiltrate, and muscle thickening (Figure 2e) . The damage score of DSS + PTX-treated mice was intermediate between DSS-only and DSS + ROL-treated mice (Figure 3) .



View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Representative photomicrographs of colonic segments from mice given regular water, ie, control (a); ROL only, twice daily (b); DSS only (c); DSS + ROL, twice daily (d); DSS + PTX, twice daily (e); and mice treated with DSS + ROL, twice daily for 5 days and then allowed to recover for an additional 3 days (f). m, muscle; small arrowheads denote edema; large arrowheads and arrows indicate inflammatory infiltrate. See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations and treatment regimen.

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Bar chart showing colonic damage score after exposure to DSS ± PDE inhibitors. Means ± SEM; n = 9 to 15, except DSS + ROL (x1) where n = 4. *,#, {delta}, statistically different (P < 0.05) groups compared to each other and control (CON). See Figure 1 legend for abbreviations and treatment regimen.

 
MPO Activity

Measurement of MPO activity revealed that DSS colitis was accompanied by an increase in MPO and that this was significantly reduced by concomitant ROL or PTX (twice daily): control = 0.10 ± 0.19; DSS = 1.53 ± 0.3 (P < 0.05 compared to control, n = 9 to 20); DSS + ROL = 0.13 ± 0.21; and DSS + PTX = 0.38 ± 0.23 U/mg wet weight of tissue.

Epithelial Function

Baseline Isc, potential difference, and tissue conductance values are shown in Table 2 . These gut parameters were not significantly different when tissues from control and DSS colitis mice were compared. In contrast, responses to all three pro-secretory stimuli were significantly reduced in tissues from mice treated with DSS, and this diminished responsiveness was not affected by co-treatment with ROL or PTX (twice daily) (Figure 4) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Basal Electrophysiological Parameters in Colonic Segments from Control and DSS-Treated Mice

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Bar charts showing the change in short-circuit current ({Delta}Isc) in colonic segments in response to electrical nerve stimulation (A), carbachol (10-4 mol/L) (B), and forskolin (10-5 mol/L) (C) after 5 days of DSS exposure ± PDE inhibitors. Means ± SEM; n = 9 to 15; *, P < 0.05 compared to controls (CON). See Figure 1 legend for treatments.

 
Cytokine Levels

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of serum samples (n = 6) and tissue homogenates (n = 3) revealed no detectable TNF-{alpha} in any of the treatment groups. (The assay protocol used herein has been used to successfully detect serum levels of TNF-{alpha} in other studies in our laboratory.)

Epithelial Viability

As shown in Figure 5 , exposure of a murine epithelial cell line to 1% or 2% DSS for 20 hours caused a two- to threefold increase in cell death that was not altered by concomitant treatment with ROL (10-6 mol/L). Similarly, use of the MTT assay as an indicator of epithelial viability (specifically mitochondrial function), revealed a significant reduction in MTT metabolism in epithelial preparations exposed to DSS that was not abrogated by concomitant ROL treatment: control = 0.71 ± 0.04; 1% DSS = 0.58 ± 0.03*, 1% DSS + ROL = 0.58 ± 0.02*, 2% DSS = 0.52 ± 0.0.02*, 2% DSS + ROL = 0.57 ± 0.04* optical density (OD) units (n = 8 replicates from a representative experiment, 3 experiments were performed; *P < 0.05 compared to control; cells treated with distilled water as a positive control = 0.05 ± 0.01* OD units).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bar chart showing viability of murine epithelial (IEC.4.1) cells exposed to 1% or 2% DSS for 24 hours in vitro ± ROL (10-6 mol/L, single addition) as determined by trypan blue dye exclusion, where increased positivity indicates increased cell death. Data are means ± SEM and are presented as percentage of controls cells cultured in media only; n = 3 experiments, with three replicates/condition in each experiment. *, P < 0.05 compared to controls; positive control of distilled water resulted in 100% positivity (data not shown).

 
Recovery Studies

The ability of ROL to reduce the histopathology in DSS colitis suggested the possibility that ROL-treated mice might recover more quickly from a 5-day course of DSS. In accordance with previous histological data, ROL + DSS-treated mice examined 3 days after the end of the treatment showed a significant preservation of colonic structure (Figure 2f) : damage scores, DSS only = 6.5 ± 0.9 and ROL + DSS = 1.9 ± 0.3 (n = 3 and n = 5, respectively). Stimulated epithelial ion transport events in colonic segments from mice 3 days after withdrawal of DSS were significantly reduced compared to control tissues (Table 3) and this reduction was similar to, or of a greater magnitude than, that observed from colonic tissue excised at the end of the 5-day DSS treatment (compare Figure 4 and Table 3 ). However, colon from mice treated with ROL + DSS showed a partial or statistically significant improvement in their responsiveness to pro-secretory stimuli (Table 3) . In addition, carbachol challenge of colon excised from mice 3 days after the DSS treatment resulted in a drop in Isc (shown as a negative value in Table 3 ), rather than the expected transient increase in Isc that occurs in tissue from normal mice. In contrast, tissues from mice treated with DSS + ROL all displayed an increase in Isc in response to carbachol, although the magnitude of the response was very variable (6.7 to 65.5 µA/cm2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Basal and Stimulated Ion Transport Events in Colon 3 Days after Termination of DSS

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The therapeutic potential of PDE inhibition has been shown in a variety of models of acute and chronic inflammation, and to some extent in trials with patients exhibiting airway inflammation.1,3,4 Analysis of inhibitors of PDEs have consistently implicated reduced TNF-{alpha} synthesis as a key component of their anti-inflammatory activity.2,5-7 These data suggest that inhibition of PDE activity could be a rational therapy for human idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease, disorders that are often accompanied by elevated TNF-{alpha} levels.9 Indeed, preliminary data from animal studies18,26 and a trial involving seven patients27 support this postulate. However, evaluations of the use of PDE inhibitors to treat enteric inflammation have focused on histopathology and primarily neglected assessment of gut function. This study was designed to examine the ability of a PDE4-selective (ie, ROL) and a nonselective PDE inhibitor (ie, PTX) to modulate the structural and functional abnormalities in murine colitis. Thus, using the established DSS model of murine colitis,10,11 we show that: 1) ROL is more effective than PTX in preventing the DSS-induced colonic histopathology; 2) neither inhibitor affected the ion transport irregularities observed at the end of a 5-day DSS treatment; and 3) ROL-treated mice showed a more rapid recovery in their responsiveness to pro-secretory agents compared to DSS-only treated mice.

Steroids are a mainstay in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and although they are very effective, their long-term use results in considerable side effects. Hence, there is a need for the development of other therapeutics to combat enteric inflammation, and one such strategy is to enhance immunosuppression by maintaining elevated cAMP levels via inhibition of PDE activity. Twice-daily treatment of mice with low-dose ROL or PTX resulted in significantly less colonic histopathology in animals with free access to 4% (w/v) DSS drinking water. Thus, general inhibition of PDE activity by PTX, or specific targeting of PDE4 by ROL resulted in greater preservation of colonic structure, and a concomitant decrease in tissue MPO levels compared to mice receiving DSS and saline or DSS and drug vehicle. PTX was consistently less effective than ROL in abrogating colonic pathology and because it was used at the same concentration as ROL, a value 20 times less than that used in other PTX studies,26,28 this suggests that the benefit of either drug is because of inhibition of PDE4, the predominant PDE in immune cells. These data support the use of PDE4 inhibitors as an anti-inflammatory option and confirm recent data showing that inhibition of PDE activity reduces the histopathology associated with colitis.18,26-28

Analysis of colonic epithelial ion transport in the DSS colitis model has hitherto not been reported. Many of the mice exposed to DSS displayed a variable diarrhea and the colons of all treated animals were inflamed, often with significant epithelial loss. It is noteworthy that the ROL-treated (twice daily) animals, although showing histological improvement still had macroscopic signs of diarrhea/water imbalance (Table 1) and this treatment did not ameliorate the ion transport (create the driving force for directed water movement) abnormalities caused by exposure to DSS (see below). Baseline Isc across colonic tissue from all DSS-treated mice (regardless of concomitant PDE therapy), was not consistently elevated and ion conductance was within the range for normal tissue, suggesting unaltered permeability. Neither observation fits with the obvious tissue pathology. However, Isc is a composite of all of the active ion transport across the tissue and so additional studies examining specific ion movements in the colitic, and adjacent tissue are required before precise statements regarding the driving forces for water movement can be made. Also, it is inconceivable that epithelial loss would not result in increased permeability and indeed DSS-induced colitis has been shown to increase permeability.29,30 The absence of a significant increase in conductance observed here is likely because of the use of whole-thickness tissues in the Ussing chamber, such that any increase in epithelial permeability was offset by muscle hypertrophy (compare Figure 2, a and c ).

Increases in Isc evoked by all three pro-secretory stimuli were significantly reduced in colonic segments excised from DSS-treated mice. Similar diminished Isc responsiveness has been observed in other animal models of colitis and in tissue resections from patients with inflammatory bowel disease.31-34 However, neither ROL nor PTX treatment led to any amelioration of the reduced Isc responses, clearly indicating uncoupling of structure and function in this model of colitis. Juxtaposition of these data with the histological portion of the study suggests that either regulation of Isc is more readily altered than derangement of colon structure, or that ion transport and colon structure are regulated by different mechanisms. Similarly, we and others have shown that colonic ion transport can be perturbed in the absence of any evidence of histological abnormalities as defined by light microscopy.22,32 For instance, colon excised from rats treated with the pro-colitic haptenizing agent TNBS (2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid) seems structurally normal 12 weeks after treatment, and although baseline ion transport and tissue conductance were within the normal range, responsiveness to nerve stimulation and carbachol remained depressed compared to tissues excised from controls.32 Thus, in assessing the value of any putative anti-inflammatory agent it would seem imperative that structural analysis be complemented by functional studies.

Given the ability of ROL to almost completely prevent DSS-induced histopathology, we postulated that ROL therapy might hasten the recovery process after DSS exposure. In support of this, we observed that whereas colonic tissue from DSS-only treated mice displayed reduced Isc responses to electrical nerve stimulation, carbachol and forskolin 3 days after replacing the DSS water with regular water, the colon from the ROL + DSS-treated animals showed a significant recovery in their secretory responsiveness. These data add further credence to the hypothesis that PDE inhibition may be a valuable adjunct therapy for colonic inflammation.

The mechanism responsible for DSS-induced colitis is unknown and a variety of anti-inflammatory strategies have been used to treat the colitis, at least in terms of the histopathology.12-16,29,35,36 Furthermore, the induction of colitis in severe combined immunodeficient, CD4+-T cell depleted, and athymic mice by DSS reveals that thymus-dependent T cells are not a prerequisite for the colitis37,38 This has led to the suggestions that DSS-induced colitis is either a macrophage-driven event39,40 (which fits with a pivotal role for TNF-{alpha}), or because of direct epithelial cytotoxicity/inhibition of proliferation.37,41,42 Thus, we sought to examine the affect of ROL therapy on TNF-{alpha} levels and epithelial viability.

At the end of the 5-day DSS exposure, TNF-{alpha} levels were neither detected in the serum nor colonic tissue homogenates from control, DSS, or DSS + ROL-treated mice. Thus, we can provide no evidence in support of inhibition of TNF-{alpha} production as a component of the anti-inflammatory activity of ROL in this model system. However, because TNF-{alpha} is rapidly mobilized it is possible that ROL did reduce the levels of TNF-{alpha} earlier in the treatment regimen. Moreover, although numerous studies have shown that phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibition reduces macrophage-stimulated TNF-{alpha} production,2,7 it has recently been shown that the reduction in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy in the rat by ROL was independent of it’s ability to reduce plasma TNF-{alpha} levels.43 Also, the clinical improvement in patients with Crohn’s disease treated with PTX did not correlate with reduced tissue TNF-{alpha} levels.27 In addition, PDE inhibition can result in reduced IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-12 levels and clearly any, or all of these cytokines may be involved in mediating enteric inflammation.44-46

Using the vital stain, trypan blue, and the MTT assay to assess epithelial viability, we found that DSS was directly toxic to the murine IEC.4.1 cell line in vitro. These findings are in accordance with other publications.37 However, simultaneous ROL treatment did not abrogate the DSS cytotoxic effects and we speculate that the beneficial effect of ROL in vivo is not because of inhibition of epithelial cell death by directly affecting the epithelial cell.

In summary, we have shown that use of the PDE inhibitors ROL and PTX significantly reduced the histopathology in a murine model of colitis. Neither agent affected the reduced secretory responsiveness that was apparent in colonic tissues examined at the end of the 5-day DSS-treatment period, although ROL therapy did enhance the recovery phase after withdrawal of the colitic stimulus. These findings add to the list of models of colitis that are characterized by perturbations in ion transport and complement a smaller number of investigations illustrating that normal histological appearance is not necessarily reflective of functional normality. We suggest that PDE inhibitors, particularly those targeted at the PDE4 isoform,47 warrant further assessment as tools to combat enteric inflammation either alone or as part of a combination therapy regimen.28


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Jane-Ann Schroeder for her assistance with the MTT assay.


    Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to Derek M. McKay, Ph.D., Intestinal Disease Research Programme, HSC-3N5, Department of Pathology, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5. E-mail: mckayd{at}fhs.mcmaster.ca

Supported by grants from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada and the Medical Research Council of Canada (# MT-13421) (to D. M. M.).

This work was presented in part, in abstract form, at the Pan-American Congress of Gastroenterology in August 1999 at Vancouver.

Accepted for publication February 16, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Torphy TJ: Phosphodiesterase isozymes. Molecular targets for novel anti-asthma agents. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 157:351-370[Free Full Text]
  2. de Moraes VLG, Singer M, Vargaftig BB, Chignard M: Effects of rolipram on cyclic AMP levels in alveolar macrophages and lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in mouse lung. Br J Pharmacol 1998, 123:631-636[Medline]
  3. Doherty AM: Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors as novel anti-inflammatory agents. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1999, 3:466-473[Medline]
  4. Teixeira MM, Gristwood RW, Cooper N, Hellewell PG: Phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitors: anti-inflammatory drugs of the future? Trends Pharmacol Sci 1997, 18:164-171[Medline]
  5. Klemm P, Harris HJ, Perretti M: Effect of rolipram in a murine model of acute inflammation: comparison with the corticoid dexamethasone. Eur J Pharmacol 1995, 281:69-74[Medline]
  6. Sekut L, Yarnall D, Stimpson SA, Noel LS, Bateman-Fite R, Clark RL, Brackeen MF, Menius JA, Connolly KM: Anti-inflammatory activity of phosphodiesterase (PDE)-IV inhibitors in acute and chronic models of inflammation. Clin Exp Immunol 1995, 100:126-132[Medline]
  7. Miotla JM, Teixeira MM, Hellewell PG: Suppression of acute lung injury in mice by an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 4. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1998, 18:411-420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ross SE, Williams RO, Mason LJ, Mauri C, Marinova-Mutafchieva L, Malfait A-M, Maini RN, Feldmann M: Suppression on TNF-{alpha} expression, inhibition of Th1 activity, and amelioration of collagen-induced arthritis by rolipram. J Immunol 1997, 159:6253-6259[Abstract]
  9. Targan SR, Hanauer SB, van Deventer SJH, Mayer L, Present DH, Braakman T, DeWoody KC, Schaible TF, Rutgeerts PJ: A short-term study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor {alpha} for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 1997, 337:1029-1035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Okayasu I, Hatakeyama S, Yamada M, Ohkusa T, Inagaki Y, Nakaya R: A novel method in induction or reliable experimental acute and chronic colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 1990, 98:694-702[Medline]
  11. Cooper HS, Murthy SNS, Shah RS, Sedergran DJ: Clinicopathologic study of dextran sulfate sodium experimental murine colitis. Lab Invest 1993, 69:238-249[Medline]
  12. Bennett CF, Kronbrust D, Henry S, Stecker K, Howard R, Cooper S, Dutson S, Hall W, Jacoby HI: An ICAM-1 antisense oligonucleotide prevents and reverses dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997, 280:988-1000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tomoyose M, Mitsuyama K, Ishida H, Toyonaga A, Tanikawa K: Role of interleukin-10 in murine model of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998, 33:435-440[Medline]
  14. Murthy S, Murthy NS, Coppola D, Wood DL: The efficacy of BATy1015 in dextran sulfate model of mouse colitis. Inflamm Res 1997, 46:224-233[Medline]
  15. Domek MJ, Iwata F, Blackman EI, Kao J, Baker M, Vidrich A, Leung FW: Anti-neutrophil serum attenuates dextran sulfate-sodium-induced colonic damage in the rat. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995, 30:1089-1094[Medline]
  16. Kojouharoff G, Hans W, Obewrmeier F, Mannel DN, Andus T, Scholmerich J: Neutralization of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) but not IL-1 reduces inflammation in chronic dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Clin Exp Immunol 1997, 107:353-358[Medline]
  17. Mahler M, Bristol IJ, Leiter EH, Workman AE, Birkenmeier EH, Elson CO, Sundberg JP: Differential susceptibility of inbred mouse strains to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Am J Physiol 1998, 274:G544-G551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hartmann G, Bidlingmaier C, Siegmund B, Albrich S, Schulze J, Tschoep K, Eigler A, Lehr H-A, Endres S: Specific type IV phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram mitigates experimental colitis in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000, 292:22-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Nelson JL, Alexander JW, Mao J-X, Vohs T, Ogle CK: Effect of pentoxifylline on survival and intestinal cytokine messenger RNA transcription in a rat model of ongoing peritoneal sepsis. Crit Care Med 1999, 27:113-119[Medline]
  20. Appleyard CB, Wallace JL: Reactivation of hapten-induced colitis and its prevention by anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Physiol 1995, 269:G119-G125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wallace JL, MacNaughton WK, Morris GP, Beck PL: Inhibition of leukotriene synthesis markedly accelerates healing in a rat model of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1989, 96:29-36[Medline]
  22. Donnelly GAE, Lu J, Takeda T, McKay DM: Colonic epithelial physiology is altered in response to the bacterial superantigen Yersinia pseudotuberculosis mitogen (YPM). J Infect Dis 1999, 180:1590-1596[Medline]
  23. McKay DM, Benjamin M, Lu J: CD4+ T cells mediate superantigen-induced abnormalities in murine jejunal ion transport. Am J Physiol 1998, 275:G29-G38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. McKay DM, Singh PK: Superantigen-activation of immune cells evokes epithelial (T84) transport and barrier abnormalities via interferon-{gamma} and tumour necrosis factor-{alpha}. Inhibition of increased permeability, but not diminished secretory responses by transforming growth factor ß2. J Immunol 1997, 159:2382-2390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mosmann TR: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Meth 1983, 65:55-63[Medline]
  26. Peterson TC, Davey K: Effect of acute pentoxifylline treatment in an experimental model of colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997, 11:575-580[Medline]
  27. Katz J, Willis J, Cooper G, Geraci K, Fiocchi C: Treatment of Crohn’s disease with pentoxifylline: lack of correlation between clinical improvement and mucosal cytokine levels. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:2644
  28. Murthy S, Cooper HS, Yoshitake H, Meyer C, Meyer CJ, Murthy NS: Combination therapy of pentoxifylline and TNF{alpha} monoclonal antibody in dextran sulfate-induced mouse colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999, 13:251-260[Medline]
  29. Bjork S, Jennische E, Dahlstrom A, Ahlman H: Influence of topical rectal application of drugs on dextran sulfate-induced colitis in rats. Dig Dis Sci 1997, 42:824-832[Medline]
  30. Kitajima S, Takuma S, Morimoto M: Changes in colonic mucosal permeability in mouse colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium. Exp Anim 1999, 48:137-143[Medline]
  31. Kachur JF, Keshavarzian A, Sundaresan R, Doria M, Walsh R, de las Alas MM, Gaginella TS: Colitis reduces short-circuit current response to inflammatory mediators in rat colonic mucosa. Inflammation 1995, 19:245-259[Medline]
  32. Asfaha S, Bell CJ, Wallace JL, MacNaughton WK: Prolonged colonic epithelial hyporesponsiveness after colitis: role of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:G703-G710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hubel KA, Renquist KS: Ion transport in normal and inflamed human jejunum in vitro: changes with electrical field stimulation and theophylline. Dig Dis Sci 1990, 35:815-820[Medline]
  34. Crowe SE, Luthra GK, Perdue MH: Mast cell mediated ion transport in the intestine from patients with and without inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 1997, 41:785-792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Murthy SNS, Cooper HS, Shim H, Shah RS, Ibrahim SA, Sedergran DJ: Treatment of dextran sulfate sodium-induced murine colitis by intracolonic cyclosporin. Dig Dis Sci 1993, 38:1722-1734[Medline]
  36. Egger B, Procaccino F, Sarosi I, Tolmas J, Buchler MW, Eysselein VE: Keratinocyte growth factor ameliorates dextran sodium sulfate colitis in mice. Dig Dis Sci 1999, 44:836-844[Medline]
  37. Dieleman LA, Ridwan BU, Tennyson GS, Beagley KW, Bucy RP, Elson CO: Dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis occurs in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Gastroenterology 1994, 107:1643-1652[Medline]
  38. Axelsson L-G, Lanndstrom E, Goldschmidt TJ, Gronberg A, Bylund-Fellenius A-C: Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced experimental colitis in immunodeficient mice: effects in CD4+-cell depleted, athymic and NK-cell depleted SCID mice. Inflamm Res 1996, 45:181-191[Medline]
  39. Shintani N, Nakajima T, Sugiura M, Murakami K, Nakamura N, Kagitani Y, Mayumi T: Proliferative effect of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-pulsed macrophages on T cells from mice with DSS-induced colitis and inhibition of effect by IgG. Scand J Immunol 1997, 46:581-586[Medline]
  40. Hirono I, Kuhara K, Hosaka S, Tomizawa S, Golberg L: Induction of intestinal tumors in rats by dextran sulfate sodium. J Natl Cancer Inst 1981, 66:579-583
  41. Ni J, Chen S-F, Hollander D: Effects of dextran sulphate sodium on intestinal epithelial cells and intestinal lymphocytes. Gut 1996, 39:234-241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Tessner T, Cohn SM, Schloemann S, Stenson WF: Prostaglandins prevent decreased epithelial cell proliferation associated with dextran sodium sulfate injury in mice. Gastroenterology 1998, 115:874-882[Medline]
  43. Reuter BK, Wallace JL: Phosphodiesterase inhibitors prevent NSAID enteropathy independently of effects on TNF{alpha} release. Am J Physiol 1999, 277:G847-G854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Neuner P, Klosner G, Schauer E, Pourmojib M, Macheiner W, Grunwald C, Knobler R, Schwartz A, Luger TA, Schwarz T: Pentoxifylline in vivo down regulates the release of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8 and tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Immunology 1994, 83:262-267[Medline]
  45. Au B-T, Teixeira MM, Collins PD, Williams TJ: Effect of PDE4 inhibitors on zymosan-induced IL-8 release from human neutrophils: synergism with prostanoids and salbutamol. Br J Pharmacol 1998, 123:1260-1266[Medline]
  46. Hasko G, Szabo C, Nemeth ZH, Salzman AL, Vizi ES: Suppression of IL-12 production by phosphodiesterase inhibition in murine endotoxemia is IL-10 independent. Eur J Immunol 1998, 28:468-472[Medline]
  47. Barnette MS, Christensen SB, Essayan DM, Grous M, Parbhakar U, Rush JA, Kagey-Sobotaka A, Torphy TJ: SB 207499 (Ariflo), a potent and selective second-generation phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor: in vitro anti-inflammatory actions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998, 284:420-426[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. A. Babbin, M. G. Laukoetter, P. Nava, S. Koch, W. Y. Lee, C. T. Capaldo, E. Peatman, E. A. Severson, R. J. Flower, M. Perretti, et al.
Annexin A1 Regulates Intestinal Mucosal Injury, Inflammation, and Repair
J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 5035 - 5044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
K. E. Barrett
New ways of thinking about (and teaching about) intestinal epithelial function
Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2008; 32(1): 25 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. Lewis, J. Caldwell, V. Phan, D. Prescott, A. Nazli, A. Wang, J. D. Soderholm, M. H. Perdue, P. M. Sherman, and D. M. McKay
Decreased epithelial barrier function evoked by exposure to metabolic stress and nonpathogenic E. coli is enhanced by TNF-{alpha}
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): G669 - G678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Videla, J. Vilaseca, C. Medina, M. Mourelle, F. Guarner, A. Salas, and J.-R. Malagelada
Selective Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase-4 Ameliorates Chronic Colitis and Prevents Intestinal Fibrosis
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 940 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. M. Hunter, A. Wang, C. L. Hirota, and D. M. McKay
Neutralizing Anti-IL-10 Antibody Blocks the Protective Effect of Tapeworm Infection in a Murine Model of Chemically Induced Colitis
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 7368 - 7375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
T. Genovese, E. Mazzon, R. D. Paola, C. Muia, M. D. Threadgill, A. P. Caputi, C. Thiemermann, and S. Cuzzocrea
Inhibitors of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Modulate Signal Transduction Pathways and the Development of Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2005; 313(2): 529 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Cuzzocrea, E. Mazzon, R. Di Paola, N. S. A. Patel, T. Genovese, C. Muia, A. De Sarro, and C. Thiemermann
Erythropoietin Reduces the Development of Experimental Inflammatory Bowel Disease
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2004; 311(3): 1272 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. G. Drannik, M. A. Pouladi, C. S. Robbins, S. I. Goncharova, S. Kianpour, and M. R. Stampfli
Impact of Cigarette Smoke on Clearance and Inflammation after Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2004; 170(11): 1164 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
C. L. Green, W. Ho, K. A. Sharkey, and D. M. McKay
Dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis reveals nicotinic modulation of ion transport via iNOS-derived NO
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): G706 - G714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Nazli, P.-C. Yang, J. Jury, K. Howe, J. L. Watson, J. D. Soderholm, P. M. Sherman, M. H. Perdue, and D. M. McKay
Epithelia Under Metabolic Stress Perceive Commensal Bacteria as a Threat
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2004; 164(3): 947 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
S J H van Deventer
Small therapeutic molecules for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
Gut, May 1, 2002; 50(90003): iii47 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A C S. Ventura and M Bohnke
Pentoxifylline influences the autocrine function of organ cultured donor corneas and enhances endothelial cell survival
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2001; 85(9): 1110 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
C. Reardon, A. Sanchez, C. M. Hogaboam, and D. M. McKay
Tapeworm Infection Reduces Epithelial Ion Transport Abnormalities in Murine Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2001; 69(7): 4417 - 4423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diaz-Granados, N.
Right arrow Articles by McKay, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diaz-Granados, N.
Right arrow Articles by McKay, D. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS