| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Double-Transgenic Mice



From the Abteilung Neuropathologie*
and
Abteilung Immunpathologie,
Pathologisches
Institut, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Institut für
Neuropathologie,
Universitätsklinikum
der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen,
Aachen, Germany; Abteilung
Pathophysiologie,§
1. Medizinische Klinik der
Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on the CNS
are unknown. IL-6R
is the specific component of the IL-6 receptor
system and hence an important co-factor of IL-6. IL-6R
is bioactive
in a membrane-bound and in a soluble (s) form. We investigated the
effects of systemically elevated levels of either human IL-6 or human
sIL-6R
or both on the CNS of transgenic mice. Although IL-6 and
sIL-6R
single transgenic mice were free of neurological
disease, IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice showed
neurological signs, such as tremor, gait
abnormalities, and paresis. However, these mice also
frequently showed prominent general weakness probably because of
the systemic effects of IL-6/IL-6R
such as liver damage and
plasmacytomas. IL-6/sIL-6R
transgenic mice exhibited massive
reactive gliosis. Lack of signs of neuronal breakdown
versus ample astrogliosis suggested that astrocytes were
selectively affected in these mice. There was neither vascular
proliferation nor inflammatory infiltration. Ultrastructural analysis
revealed blood-brain barrier (BBB) changes manifested by hydropic
astrocytic end-feet. However, albumin immunohistochemistry did
not reveal major BBB leakage. Our results indicate that increased and
constitutive systemic expression of IL-6 together with its soluble
receptor sIL-6R
is less harmful to the brain than to other organs.
The BBB remains primarily intact. IL-6/IL-6R
,
however, might be directly responsible for the selective
activation of astrocytes.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
triggers the association of the IL-6R
subunit with
a second membrane glycoprotein, gp130, which
transduces the IL-6 signal.2,3
Neurons and glial cells can
produce IL-6.4-8
IL-6 has pleiotropic effects within the
nervous system9,10
including neurotrophic7,8
and neuronal differentiation promoting activities.11
In
addition, IL-6 promotes peripheral nerve fiber outgrowth in
vivo.12 Elevated IL-6 blood levels are found in diseases such as plasmacytoma/myeloma, osteoporosis, autoimmune diseases, and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).1 IL-6 has also been implicated as an important mediator of pathophysiological processes in the central nervous system (CNS), such as demyelination,13,14 neurodegeneration,15 and neoplastic transformation of glial cells.16-18 In two human disorders involving the nervous system, Castlemans disease and polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, skin changes (POEMS) syndrome, highly elevated systemic IL-6 levels have been detected, suggesting that systemically increased IL-6 might be harmful to the nervous system.19-23 Mice overexpressing IL-6 in bone marrow cells develop a syndrome resembling Castlemans disease.24 In both conditions, polyneuropathy can be a prominent symptom; additionally, chordoid meningeal tumors with prominent lymphocytic infiltration have been reported in Castlemans disease.19,22,25
Transgenic mouse models have advanced the understanding of the CNS pathobiology of IL-6 in vivo.26 These studies highlighted the central role of astrocytes. For example, expression of murine IL-6 from the prenatally active astrocyte-specific glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) promoter27 induced a strong and lifelong reactive gliosis as well as microglia activation, vascular proliferation, and neuronal damage.27,28 The central role of IL-6 in regulating astrocyte responses is emphasized by the reciprocal mouse model deficient in IL-6 showing impairment of neuroglial activation after injury.29 In addition, a ciliary neurotrophic factor transgene under the control of GFAP promoter sequences also induced prominent reactive gliosis in mice.30 Wild-type mice that had been injected with ciliary neurotrophic factor into uninjured brain showed the same glial response.30 When IL-6 was targeted to neurons by the rat neuron-specific enolase promoter, neuron-specific enolase-IL-6 transgenic mice also developed reactive astrocytosis and an increase in ramified microglial cells, but no apparent neuronal damage.31 In GFAP-IL-6 mice, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) never developed completely.32
While the role of IL-6 expressed in astrocytes and neurons has been
extensively investigated, the effects of systemically circulating IL-6
and sIL-6R
in the CNS have not been addressed so far. Because
IL-6R
is bioactive in a membrane-bound and in a soluble form,
slL-6R
is an important cofactor of IL-6. In fact, the IL-6/sIL-6R
complex rather than IL-6 is believed to be the active form in
vivo.33
Interestingly, mice transgenic for IL-6 and a
membrane-anchored IL-6R
developed hypertrophy of ventricular
myocardium.34
Involvement of the CNS has not been
described in this model, even though mice overexpressing IL-6 locally
in the brain display marked CNS alterations and at least two human
conditions associated with high IL-6 levels, Castlemans disease and
polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, skin changes
syndrome, show nervous system involvement (see above). Therefore, we
investigated the effects of high levels of circulating IL-6 and its
soluble
receptor on the CNS in a transgenic mouse model, focusing
on astroglial and BBB alterations.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Double-Transgenic Mice
Heterozygous double-transgenic mice were obtained by
cross-breeding metallothionine-I/IL-6 mice35
with
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase/hsIL-6R
mice.36
These double-transgenic mice expressed the transgenic proteins
systemically under the control of the metallothionein-I
promoter37
and the neonatal active phosphoenolpyruvate
carboxy kinase promoter,38
respectively.
Detection of IL-6 and IL-6R
Gene Products
For transgenic RNA analysis, total RNA from different organs was
isolated by the guanidine isothiocyanate method.39
Expression of IL-6 and sIL-6R
mRNAs was analyzed previously by
Northern blots probed with either a 32P-labeled
cDNA of IL-635
or with a PstI-XhoI
fragment of the IL-6R
cDNA.36
Transgenic protein
expression was investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
and immunoprecipitation as reported earlier.36
Biological activity of IL-6 was determined by either using the 7TD1
proliferation assay40
or the IL-6-dependent cell line
B9.41
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
Most major organs (brain, spinal cord, heart, lung, thymus, liver, kidney, spleen, ovary/testis, intestine, eye, skeletal muscle) were fixed in formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on 4-µm sections. For GFAP immunohistochemistry of brain sections, the indirect peroxidase-staining method was applied using a rabbit anti-cow antiserum (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) secondary antibody. For the detection of BBB leakage, albumin immunohistochemistry was performed by use of a rabbit anti-human antiserum (DAKO) and a biotinylated swine anti-rabbit secondary antibody. The reaction was visualized using an avidin biotin alkaline phosphatase system and the chromogen new-fuchsin (DAKO).
The degree of gliosis was scored as follows: 0, no GFAP immunoreactive astrocytes; +, less than three GFAP immunoreactive astrocytes/high-power field (with x40 lens); ++, less than 10 GFAP immunoreactive astrocytes/high-power field; +++, more than 10 GFAP immunoreactive astrocytes/high-power field. Liver infiltration by plasmacytoma cells and hematopoetic cells was scored as follows: 0, no infiltration; +, minor increase in mononuclear cell content; ++, moderate mononuclear cell infiltration and moderate widening of few portal canals, minor liver cell necrosis; +++, massive infiltration of numerous portal canals with major widening as well as lobular infiltration and major liver cell necrosis. The infiltration of lungs and kidneys by plasmacytoma cells was scored as follows: 0, no infiltration; +, one to three small infiltrates on cross sections of the whole organs; ++, one large or more than three small infiltrates; +++, large, confluent infiltrates. The scoring was performed by two independent observers (AGB, JW) blinded to the identity (wild type, single, or double transgenic) of the mice.
Ultrastructural Examination
For electron microscopy, brain samples of wild-type, IL-6,
sIL-6R
, and IL-6/sIL-6R
transgenic mice were fixed in 3.9%
phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde and embedded in epoxy resin. Semithin
sections were stained with p-phenyldiamine and toluidine
blue. Ultrathin sections were contrast enhanced with lead citrate and
uranyl acetate, and examined using a Philips EM 300 as described
elsewhere.42
Statistical Analysis
To determine whether gliosis is interrelated with age and/or mononuclear cell infiltration in lung, liver, and kidney we used Pearson correlation coefficients.43 The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess statistical differences in the distribution of various parameters from the wild-type and the two transgenic mouse lines. Where differences were found a pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction was applied to compare the different lines.44
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nontransgenic littermates of various ages stayed healthy and
symptom-free throughout the whole duration of the study (11 months).
Autopsy of all three wild-type control animals and subsequent
histological examination revealed no pathological changes in any organ
examined except for minor gliosis of unknown cause in one wild-type
animal. The sIL-6R
single-transgenic
mice were also considered to be negative controls, because mouse IL-6
does not bind to human sIL-6 receptor
.45
Accordingly,
the three human sIL-6R
transgenic mice were completely inconspicuous
and also served as controls.
Analysis of Transgene Expression
Hemizygous IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice co-expressing
both transgenes were used to determine the effect of the IL-6/sIL-6R
complex on the CNS in vivo. In IL-6 mice transgene
expression is driven by the metallothionein-I promoter.35
Even though it has been described that this promoter is preferentially
active in fibrous and protoplasmatic astrocytes,46
Northern blot analysis of total RNA from several organs, including
brain, had revealed that the liver is the major organ for hIL-6 mRNA
expression.35
Metallothionine-I/IL-6 transgenic mice
express IL-6 constitutively in the liver and secrete the cytokine into
the blood.35
Serum concentrations ranged between 10 and 20
ng/ml.47
Expression of the sIL-6R
transgene was controlled by the neonatally
active promoter of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase gene that
drives expression in the liver, kidney, and adipose
tissue.38,48
As shown previously, Northern blot analysis
from different tissues showed transcripts of the hsIL-6R
in the
liver and kidney, but not in the heart, skeletal muscle, or
brain.45
In the brain, we could detect mRNAs of both
transgenes only by use of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain
reaction (not shown). Serum levels of sIL-6R
were quantified by
Western blot analysis and ranged between 4 and 8
µg/ml.45
The IL-6/hsIL-6R
complex could be
immunoprecipitated from the serum.45
IL-6/IL-6R
double-transgenic mice had elevated IL-6 plasma levels, and the plasma
half-life of IL-6 was significantly prolonged.45
Clinical Phenotype of Double-Transgenic Animals
IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice have already been shown
previously to differ from sIL-6R
and IL-6 single transgenic mice
mainly in three aspects: 1) plasmacytoma development was significantly
accelerated and aggravated; 2) extramedullary hematopoiesis was
strongly activated first in the spleen and later in the liver, and
subsequently all peripheral blood cell counts were highly increased;
and 3) significant hepatocellular hyperplasia and secondary liver
pathology, including pellosis and areactive necroses were
induced.45,49,50
Here, we investigated the neuropathological consequences of either
circulating IL-6 and sIL-6R
or both in transgenic mouse brains. In
single transgenic mouse lines neurological symptoms were absent. In
contrast, all IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice developed
neurological symptoms, such as tremor, gait abnormalities, and paresis
after 2 to 6 months of life. However, these symptoms were part of a
larger complex of effects of IL-6/IL-6R
including weight loss; fur
abnormalities; liver, kidney, and lung damage; and plasmacytomas and
can therefore at least in part be attributed to the general weakness.
Histopathological Findings
At the light microscopic level, wild-type as well as sIL-6R
transgenics were virtually free of reactive gliosis (not shown). In
addition, these mice did not show impairments or defects in other
organs, such as liver, lung, kidney, or muscle (not shown). A small
number of reactive astrocytes could be detected in the brains of two
IL-6 single transgenic animals by GFAP immunohistochemistry (Figure 1a)
. In kinetical terms, gliosis in IL-6
transgenic mice did not increase during a follow-up time of 11 months.
The low level of gliosis in these mice was not significantly different
from the levels found in the sIL-6R
and wild-type control mice
(P = 0.074). Neurons of these mice appeared
unaltered in shape and number when compared to normal control animals
(Figure 1)
. Compared to the brain, which showed minor to moderate
gliosis in only two out of 10 animals, the lungs and kidneys of the
IL-6 transgenic mice were considerably more affected; they showed
infiltration by lymphoid cells in six out of 10 animals each.
|
double-transgenic mice
were also considerably less affected compared to the extent of lesions
in lungs, livers, and kidneys, which showed prominent lymphoid
infiltration in most cases (Table 1)
mice displayed the
typical hallmarks of reactive astrogliosis, ie, hypertrophy and strong
GFAP expression (Figure 1, b and c)
double-transgenic animals differed significantly from the
degree of gliosis found in the IL-6 and IL-6R
single transgenic as
well as in the wild-type mice (P < 0.05).
Histological examination of brain sections at different time points
throughout a period of 2.5 to 8 months demonstrated that the degree of
gliosis in IL-6/sIL-6R
mice was stable and not time-dependent. The
reactively transformed astrocytes were distributed all throughout the
brain and not at preferred sites. The number of neurons in
IL-6/sIL-6R
mice appeared neither reduced nor increased when
compared to the wild-type, sIL-6R
, and IL-6 mice. There were no
histopathological signs of neuronal damage such as chromatolysis or
shrinkage/eosinophilia. Cerebral vascular proliferation, necrosis,
inflammatory cellular infiltrates, or accumulations of macrophages or
activated microglial cells were absent in the histological sections of
any group examined. Importantly, no leptomeningeal infiltrates or
tumors were found.
|
double-transgenic mice45,47,49
did not
parallel the development of gliosis in the brains of the IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice. For example, the 6-month-old mouse that
suffered from splenomegaly and major intestinal infiltration of
hematogenic precursor cells (JR22) had only minor astrogliosis. On the
other hand, another IL-6/sIL-6R
mouse 7 months of age (JR6)
diagnosed with only minor liver damage was assigned strongly gliotic
(Table 1)
double-transgenic mice. Pearsons coefficient analysis, Kruskal-Wallis
one-way analysis of variance, and pairwise Kruskal-Wallis analysis did
not show any significant correlation for all comparisons (gliosis
versus liver, kidney, and lung damage).
Albumin immunohistochemistry of the brains of all mice examined in the
present study did not reveal any leakage of albumin into the brain
parenchyma, indicating that the BBB was primarily intact even in the
IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice (Figure 1, e and f)
.
Ultrastructural Alterations of the CNS
In the present study we focused on glial and BBB abnormalities in
the CNS of IL-6 and IL-6/sIL-6R
transgenic mice. Wild-type and
sIL-6R
transgenic mice served as controls. The capillary walls of
these normal control mice (Figure 2a)
, as
well as of IL-6 (Figure 2b)
and IL-6/sIL-6R
(Figure 2, c and d)
mice
displayed no signs of endothelial damage such as fenestration or
nuclear or cytoplasmic irregularities. There were no detectable
alterations of endothelial tight junctions and no thickening or any
other alteration of the vascular basement membranes in any mouse line.
The glial sheath in the control mice looked normal with only minor
focal hydropic changes (Figure 2a)
. In IL-6 mice, swelling of astrocyte
end-feet was moderate, if present at all. In contrast, perivascular
astrocytes of IL-6/sIL-6R
transgenics were swollen considerably
(Figure 2, c and d)
. These hydropic astrocytic processes were a very
frequent finding. The degree of vascular luminal narrowing increased
with the degree of vacuolization (Figure 2, c and d)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and double-transgenic mice overexpressing
IL-6/sIL-6R
systemically to clarify the contribution of the
different components of this ligand/receptor system. In IL-6 and
sIL-6R
single-transgenic mice, neurological symptoms were absent. As
predicted, sIL-6R
mice were normal, because mouse IL-6 does not
crosstalk with human sIL-6R
. We found only few GFAP-positive
reactive astrocytes in IL-6 mice even though systemic effects of IL-6
overexpression including plasmacytoma development were prominent in
these mice. In contrast, IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice had
marked neurological symptoms and showed massive reactive gliosis in the
context of severe general weakness. Because neuronal density was
apparently not reduced on the histological level, a selective effect on
astrocytes seems to be operative in these mice.
Typically, reactive gliosis was manifested by hypertrophy and
hyperplasia of astrocytes similar to the GFAP-IL-6 mice reported
previously.27
GFAP-IL-6 mice suffered from tremor, ataxia,
and seizures. Life expectancy of GFAP-IL-6 mice was approximately 6
months for high expressors and 12 months for low expressors,
respectively.27
Our IL-6/sIL-6R
mice lived for 2 to 7
months until the onset of severe symptoms which were, however, caused
predominantly by extracerebral alterations such as plasmacytomas and
liver cell necrosis.
Nevertheless, the GFAP-IL-6 mice are inappropriate for studying the
effects of systemically circulating IL-6 on astrocytes. The profound
difference between the two models lies in the source of IL-6
production. In GFAP-IL-6 mice, IL-6 expression is tissue-selective, and
ensuing damage is confined locally to the CNS. In our model, the
distribution of IL-6 and sIL-6R
is systemic. Transgene expression of
cytokine and ligand takes place in different organs and outside the
CNS. In this way the individual mediators can float freely and interact
unbiased with each other. It is interesting to speculate that
circulating IL-6 and sIL-6R
have to be complexed first
extracerebrally before passing the BBB to induce gliosis. The stronger
phenotype in IL-6/sIL-6R
double-transgenic mice might be because of
potentiated IL-6 signaling.45
In this way, IL-6 is capable
of inducing a vigorous response in primarily less responsive cell
populations including neuronal and glial cells.33
This
point is strengthened by the fact that sIL-6R
mice had elevated IL-6
plasma levels and a prolonged plasma half-life of IL-6 when treated
with exogenous IL-6.45
The central role of astrocytes in inducing BBB properties has been
illustrated by several studies in vivo52
and
in vitro.53
Astrocytes and their conditioned
media can induce BBB properties of the endothelium in vitro,
and it was suggested that this effect is mediated by astroglia-secreted
IL-6.54
However, IL-6 is also capable of inducing
disruption of the BBB in vitro55
and in
vivo.32
In this light, the perturbing effects in
GFAP-IL-6 mice on BBB formation as well as the induction of other
vascular abnormalities such as neoangiogenesis27
are not
surprising. In contrast to normal mice where the BBB develops between
day 7 and 14, formation of normal BBB was precluded in the GFAP-IL-6
transgenic mice.32
To obtain an animal model in which BBB
formation per se is not precluded, we took advantage of cross-breeding
single-transgenic mouse strains to elucidate the individual
contributions of the different mediators IL-6, sIL-6R
, and
IL-6/IL-6R
on the morphological integrity of the BBB.
In our model the edematous swelling of perivascular astrocytes in
IL-6/sIL-6R
mice presumably represents a transformational step
indicating damage, but not necessarily disruption of the BBB. Opening
of the BBB can generally be ascribed to three possible mechanisms: 1)
separation of the interendothelial tight junctions, 2) increased
vesicular transport and the formation of transendothelial channels, and
3) biochemical and structural alteration of the endothelial cell plasma
membrane resulting in increased permeability.56
We found
no endothelial fenestrations, no alterations in brain endothelial tight
junctions, and no ultrastructural evidence for increased vesicular
transport through cerebral capillaries in the IL-6/sIL-6R
mice.
Moreover, albumin immunohistochemistry, an established method to
evaluate BBB integrity,57,58
gave no indication of a
vasogenic edema with altered BBB permeability and leakage of plasma
constituents into the brain.59
Thus, even high systemic
levels of IL-6 and sIL-6R
did not cause BBB breakdown in our mouse
model. This result does not support the hypothesis that systemically
elevated IL-6 is a major cause of BBB breakdown.55,60
In
line with our observations, IL-6 injected intravitreally did not cause
a measurable increase in blood retinal barrier permeability, whereas
tumor necrosis factor-
induced increased
permeability.61
In this context, it is also interesting to
note that in mice overexpressing IL-6 in neurons because of an IL-6
transgene regulated by the neuron-specific enolase promoter, no
vascular changes were detected in the brain.31
Similar to
our IL-6/IL-6R
double-transgenic mice, astrogliosis was the major
finding in the neuron-specific enolase-IL-6 mice.31
These
results suggest that systemic and even local cerebral overexpression of
IL-6 does not cause BBB disruption. Apparently, IL-6 overexpression has
to be directly targeted to astrocytes by use of a GFAP promoter, which
leads to early and sustained cerebral IL-6 overexpression from
development through adulthood preventing BBB formation.32
The following hypothesis is proposed to explain the effects of
systemically increased IL-6 and IL-6R
on astrocytes. Blood-borne
cytokines have been shown to cross the BBB by saturable transport
systems.62,63
Hence, it is conceivable that IL-6, akin to
ciliary neurotrophic factor and tumor necrosis factor,64
crossed the BBB by this mechanism. Consistent with our findings,
granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor crossed the BBB and
blood-spinal cord barrier significantly faster than the control
substance, albumin.65
Thus, IL-6 and IL-6R
conceivably
penetrated the BBB in the double-transgenic mice even though signs of
major BBB disruption were absent. In addition, examination of the role
of IL-6 and sIL-6R
in IL-6 induction in vitro showed
that, while treatment of astrocytes with IL-6 and sIL-6R
resulted in
modest increases in IL-6 mRNA expression, co-treatment with either
tumor necrosis factor-
or IL-1ß plus IL-6/IL-6R
lead to
synergistic increases in IL-6 gene expression,66
again
highlighting the pivotal role of sIL-6R
in determining the effects
of IL-6 in astrocytes.
In the present study, systemic overexpression of IL-6 and sIL-6R
induced liver and kidney damage as already reported
previously.35,45,47,49,50,67
Still, several findings
indicate that the vigorous astrocytic response was caused by the
systemically expressed and complexed IL-6/IL-6R
transgene product
and was not a consequence of the systemic diseases of the
double-transgenic animals: the intensity of gliosis was not
age-dependent, whereas the systemic consequences of IL-6/IL-6R
overexpression increase with age.50
In addition, there was
no correlation between the extent of infiltration of liver, lung, and
kidneys on the one hand and astrogliosis on the other hand. Moreover,
IL-6 single-transgenic mice that also showed considerable plasmacytoma
development, liver damage, and other extracerebral
changes50
displayed only minor, insignificant gliosis.
Finally, no histologically or electron microscopically detectable
neuronal damage was found in any animal, which should be present in the
case of prominent metabolic or other prominent systemic damage
affecting the brain. It is, however, important to note that we did not
perform detailed stereological measurements to quantify neuronal
numbers.
Surprisingly, the brains of the double-transgenic mice also seemed to
be protected against plasmacytoma infiltration, because there was no
necrosis and no infiltration of the brain by plasmacytoma infiltrates
or precursor lesions, even though other organs (ie, liver, kidneys,
lung) were heavily infiltrated in many double-transgenic animals.
Leptomeningeal lymphocytic infiltrates or meningeal tumors were also
absent in both IL-6 and IL-6/IL-6R
overexpressing mice, suggesting
that the elevated IL-6 levels found in patients with Castlemans
disease are at least not the sole cause of these meningeal alterations.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Bernese Cancer League, the Dr. med. h. c. E. Braun Foundation, Basel, Switzerland, and the Interdisziplinäres Zentrum "CNS," Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Germany.
Accepted for publication August 3, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. P. Kristiansen and T. Mandrup-Poulsen Interleukin-6 and Diabetes: The Good, the Bad, or the Indifferent? Diabetes, December 1, 2005; 54(suppl_2): S114 - S124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |