| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |




From the Department of Adult Oncology,*
Dana-Farber
Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of
Pathology,
Brigham and Womens Hospital,
Boston, Massachusetts; and the Department of Cell
Biology,
Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts; and the Department of
Pathology,§
University of Ancona, Ancona,
Italy
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Np63). p63 is
expressed in the basal cells of many epithelial organs and its germline
inactivation in the mouse results in agenesis of organs such as skin
appendages and the breast. Here, we show that prostate basal
cells, but not secretory or neuroendocrine cells,
express p63. In addition, prostate basal cells in culture
predominantly express the
Np63
isotype. In contrast, p63
protein is not detected in human prostate adenocarcinomas.
Finally, and most importantly,
p63(-/-) mice do not develop the prostate. These
results indicate that p63 is required for prostate development and
support the hypothesis that basal cells represent and/or include
prostate stem cells. Furthermore, our results show that p63
immunohistochemistry may be a valuable tool in the differential
diagnosis of benign versus malignant prostatic lesions.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, TAp63ß, and
TAp63
) contain the transactivating (TA) domain and
are able to transactivate p53 reporter genes and induce
apoptosis. In contrast, the other three isotypes
(
Np63
,
Np63ß, and
Np63
) are transcribed from an internal promoter
localized within intron 3, lack the TA domain, and act as
dominant-negatives to suppress transactivation by both
p53 and TAp63 isotypes.
p63 is selectively expressed in the basal cell
compartment of a variety of epithelial tissues.4,5
Further, p63-deficient mice show severe defects in the
development of epithelial organs that express p63 protein, namely
agenesis of squamous epithelia, mammary, salivary, and lachrymal
glands.6,7
Altogether, these results suggest that p63 may
be essential for the maintenance of a stem cell population in various
epithelial tissues. Knowledge of the molecular events underlying prostate development is limited. Normal prostate epithelium consists of three different types of cells: secretory, basal, and neuroendocrine. A subset of cells that is morphologically and immunophenotypically intermediate between basal and secretory cells has also been identified within the normal prostate epithelium.8-11 This observation has lead to the hypothesis that basal cells represent the precursors of secretory cells. In contrast to this hypothesis, cell kinetic studies in the rat prostate suggest that basal and secretory cells are independent lineages with self-renewal capacities.12,13 Therefore, the existence of a prostate stem cell able to give rise to both basal and secretory cells remains highly controversial.
We have previously shown that both human and mouse prostate basal cells express p63 protein (see Yang et al4 and data not shown). This result suggests that p63 may play a critical role in prostate development by maintaining a prostate stem cell population. However, because the mouse prostate starts to develop only during the last few days of gestation14,15 and p63(-/-) mice die at birth, assessment of prostate development in these mice requires a very accurate morphological analysis and no data are currently available in the literature.
In the present study, we first confirmed that p63 represents a selective marker of basal cells within the prostatic epithelium by analyzing p63 expression in a series of normal prostates and in normal, basal PrEC prostate cells. Second, because it has been demonstrated that prostate cancers express markers of secretory cells and are usually negative for basal cell markers,16,17 we analyzed p63 expression in a series of 130 prostatic carcinomas and in prostate cancer cell lines. Finally, to assess the role of p63 in prostate development we histologically analyzed the periurethral region in day 1, p63(-/-) male mice.
Our results show that p63 is a reliable prostate basal cell marker and
that the
Np63
isotype is the most abundantly represented in
normal prostate basal (PrEC) cells. Because p63 protein is consistently
undetectable in prostate cancers, we propose that p63 expression may be
used in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions
of the prostate. Finally and most importantly, our results indicate
that p63 expression is necessary for the normal development of the
mouse prostate, suggesting that p63-positive basal cells may
represent/include prostate stem cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was performed after approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Womens Hospital.
One hundred thirty prostate cancer specimens, were retrieved from the files of the departments of Pathology of the Brigham and Womens Hospital, the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, and the University of Ancona, Italy, and used in immunohistochemistry experiments. The prostate cancer patients analyzed included 29 patients treated with total androgen ablation therapy for 3 months before surgery (Zoladex depot every 28 days plus Casodex 50 mg/day for 12 weeks) and 101 patients who did not receive any treatment before surgery.
Normal basaloid PrEC prostate cells (Clonetics, Walkersville, MD) and LNCaP, PC3, and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines (ATCC, Rockville, MD) were used in immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments. PC3 cells were also used for transfection experiments. Normal stromal PrSC prostate cells (Clonetics) were used in immunoblotting experiments.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunostaining was performed in all tissue specimens and paraffin-embedded cell lines using the 4A4 anti-p63 antibody, which recognizes all six p63 isotypes.4 A subset of 58 samples was double-immunostained for p63 and HMWCK (34ßE12; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). Double-immunostaining for p63 and chromogranin A (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle on Tyne, UK) was performed in 10 samples.
For p63 immunostaining, 5-µm sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to microwaving in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer, pH 6.0 (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) in a 750 W oven for 15 minutes. Slides were allowed to cool at room temperature for 30 minutes. The 4A4 antibody (1:50 dilution) was applied at room temperature for 2 hours in an automated stainer (Optimax Plus 2.0 bc; BioGenex, San Ramon, CA). Detection steps were performed by the instrument using the MultiLink-HRP kit (BioGenex). Peroxidase activity was localized using 3,3-diaminobenzidine or 3,3-diaminobenzidine-nickel chloride. Standardized development time periods allowed accurate comparison of all samples.
For double-immunostaining experiments, tissue sections were subsequently incubated with the second antibody (anti-HMWCK or anti-chromogranin A) at 1:50 dilution for 30 minutes. Detection was performed using alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin and new fuchsin (BioGenex).
Substitution of the primary antibody with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) served as negative-staining control.
Immunoblot Analysis
PrEC, PrSC, LNCaP, PC3, and DU145 cells were lysed in 200 µl of lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 250 mol/L NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 50 mmol/L NaF, 0.1 mmol/L Na3VO4) containing 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 1 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Immunoblotting was performed as previously described18 using the 4A4 anti-p63 antibody at 1:250 dilution.
Cell Transfection
PC3 cells were maintained in F-12 nutrient mixture medium
supplemented with 8% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.,
Gaithersburg, MD). A pCDNA3 vector encoding myc epitope-tagged
Np63
isotype4
was transfected in PC3
cells using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Boehringer Mannheim)
according to the manufacturers direction. Briefly, PC3 cells were
incubated at 37°C in a 250-ml flask with a solution consisting of 20
µg of DNA, 30 µl of FuGENE 6 transfection reagent, and F-12
nutrient mixture medium supplemented with 8% fetal bovine serum.
Cells were harvested 24 hours after transfection.
Real-Time Quantitative PCR (Taqman PCR)
RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription (RT)
Total RNA was extracted from PrEC, LNCaP, PC3, and DU145 cells with the use of the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), according to manufacturers directions. For cDNA synthesis, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 250 µmol/L of each dNTP, 20 U of RNase inhibitor, 50 U of MuLV reverse transcriptase, 2.5 µmol/L random hexamers, and 1x buffer (1.5 mmol/L MgCl2) (all reagents were purchased from PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The reaction mix was incubated at 42°C for 45 minutes and then denatured at 99°C for 5 minutes. For each sample, a control reaction not containing the reverse transcriptase enzyme was also performed.
Real-Time PCR
Specific primers and probe sets for TAp63 and
Np63 isotypes (Figure 1)
were designed from sequences in the
GenBank database using the Primer Express 1.0 Software (PE Applied
Biosystems). The primers and hybridization probes spanned an intron to
exclude annealing to genomic DNA. The housekeeping
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene was used as
endogenous control to standardize the amount of RNA in each reaction
(Taqman GAPDH control reagents). All primers and probes were
synthesized by PE Applied Biosystems. PCR was performed on the cDNA
samples using an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (PE Applied
Biosystems). The Taqman PCR Core Reagent Kit (PE Applied Biosystems)
was used according to the manufacturers protocol with the following
modifications: dUTP was replaced by dTTP and incubation with
AmpErase was omitted. For each sample tested, PCR reaction was
performed in a 50 µl volume containing 2 µl of cDNA reaction
(equivalent to 100 ng of template RNA) and 2.5 U of AmpliTaq Gold.
Oligonucleotide primers and fluorogenic probes were added to a final
concentration of 100 nmol/L each. The amplification step consisted
of 60 cycles of 94°C for 45 seconds, 54°C for 45 seconds, and
64°C for 1 minute.
|
Np63, and
GAPDH) on the same 96-well plate to generate standard curves, which
related the threshold cycle
(CT) to the log input amount of
template. All samples were amplified in triplicates. The relative
amount of each p63 transcript in each cell line was determined by using
the standard curve method and by normalizing for GAPDH mRNA expression
levels, as described in detail in the ABI PRISM Sequence Detection
System User Bulletin No. 2 (PE Applied Biosystems) and
elsewhere.19
The amplification efficiencies for
Np63
and TAp63 transcripts were also calculated. Because they were
approximately similar (TA/
N relative efficiency curve had a slope
value of 0.91),
Np63 and TAp63 transcripts levels could be compared
with reasonable accuracy. Prostate Analysis of p63(-/-) and Wild-Type Newborn Mice
p63(-/-) mice were generated as previously described.6 The periurethral region of newborn p63(-/-) male mice and of newborn wild-type B57Bl/6 male mice (controls) was analyzed. Specifically, the caudal portion of each animal was sectioned along a coronal plane, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Histological examination was performed on paraffin sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Coronal sections of the entire length of the urethra were examined. In addition, the periurethral region of both newborn p63(-/-) and wild-type male mice was immunostained for p63 as described in the Immunohistochemistry section.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostatectomy Specimens
We first determined the expression of p63 protein in normal
prostate tissue. All prostatectomy specimens showed universal p63
immunostaining of basal cell nuclei, whereas secretory cells were
consistently negative (Figure 2a)
.
|
1
to 5%) of p63-positive/HMWCK-negative basal cells was identified
(Figure 2, c and d)Normal Prostate Cells (PrEC and PrSC)
PrEC and PrSC cells are commercially available, normal prostate basal and stromal cells, respectively. We confirmed by immunohistochemistry the basal cell phenotype of PrEC cells (positivity for HMWCK and negativity for androgen receptor and prostate-specific antigen) (Signoretti and Loda, unpublished data).
By immunohistochemistry, 80% of PrEC cells expressed p63 protein
in the nuclei (Figure 3a)
. Immunoblot
analysis of PrEC cell lysate with anti-p63 antibody showed a major band
at
80 kd and a fainter band at
60 kd (Figure 3e)
. In contrast,
PrSC cells were negative for p63 expression by immunoblotting (not
shown). Immunoblotting of PC3 cells transfected with a mammalian
expression vector encoding myc epitope-tagged
Np63
isotype
generated a band that migrated slightly slower than the 80 kd band
obtained with PrEC cells (not shown). These results are consistent with
our previous data obtained in primary human foreskin
keratinocytes.4
Taken together our results suggest that
Np63
is the predominant p63 isotype in PrEC cells.
|
Prostatectomy Specimens
We next examined p63 protein expression in 130 human prostate cancers. HMWCK expression was concomitantly analyzed in a subset of 58 cases by double-immunostaining.
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was detected in 48 of
130 prostatectomy specimens. In all prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
cases, dysplastic cells were negative for both p63 and HMWCK, but a rim
of residual p63-positive basal cells could be identified (Figure 2e)
.
One hundred twenty-six of 130 (97%) invasive prostate cancers were
negative for p63 (Figure 2f)
, whereas in four cases, <1% of cells
were positive for both p63 and HMWCK (not shown). In contrast, in three
cases a minority of cells (<5%) was positive for HMWCK but negative
for p63 (not shown).
Prostate Cancer Cell Lines (LNCaP, PC3, DU145)
By both immunoblot and immunohistochemical analysis LNCaP, PC3,
and DU145 cells were negative for p63 protein expression (Figure 3, be)
.
Np63 Is the Most Abundant p63 Isotype in PrEC Cells
Immunoblot analysis showed that
Np63
likely represents the
most abundant p63 protein in PrEC cells whereas prostate tumor cell
lines are negative for p63 expression. To investigate the relative
abundance of p63 isotypes at the RNA level,
Np63 and TAp63
transcripts levels were compared in PrEC, LNCaP, PC3, and DU145 cells
by real-time relative quantitative PCR (TaqMan-PCR). As compared to
PrEC cells and after normalization for GAPDH mRNA levels,
Np63 mRNA
levels were at least 2,000 times lower in PC3 cells and were
undetectable in LNCaP and DU145 cells. TAp63 mRNA levels were similar
in PrEC and PC3 cells (ratio PC3/PrEC = 1.3) and were
significantly lower in LNCaP and DU145 cells with 14-fold and sevenfold
decreases, respectively. Reactions in which the reverse transcriptase
enzyme was omitted did not yield significant amplification (data not
shown). These results indicate that
Np63 transcripts are virtually
absent in prostate cancer cell lines, whereas TAp63 mRNA levels are
detectable in varying amounts in all three cancer cell lines tested.
In PrEC cells, the threshold cycle (CT) for
Np63 amplification was significantly lower as
compared to the CT for TAp63 (23
versus 30 when 100 ng of RNA were used as template) (not
shown), indicating that
Np63 transcripts are expressed at
significantly higher levels than TAp63 transcripts in these cells.
p63 Is Essential for Normal Prostate Development in the Mouse
Histological examination of the entire length of the urethra in
newborn p63(-/-) male mice revealed absence of the
prostate. Specifically, no ducts or epithelial budding structures could
be identified either in the ventral or in the dorsolateral region of
the periurethral mesenchyma (Figure 4b)
.
Conversely, in control mice, epithelial structures were present in both
the ventral and dorsolateral portions of the periurethral region
(Figure 4a)
. The epithelial structures consisted of both solid buds and
small glands. By immunohistochemistry, both urothelial and prostatic
basal cells of wild-type mice expressed p63 protein (Figure 4a
, inset).
In contrast, p63 expression could not be detected in either epithelial
or stromal cells of p63(-/-) mice (Figure 4b
, inset).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In normal prostate epithelium, the lineage relationships between secretory, basal, and neuroendocrine cells, and the existence of a common precursor, are still matters of debate. The vast majority of prostate cancers express markers of secretory cells such as androgen receptor and prostate-specific antigen, and are negative for basal cell markers.16,17 Consequently, it has been generally accepted that prostate cancer arises from malignant transformation of secretory cells. However, prostate carcinomas may also express genes characteristic of basal cells.17,21-25 Thus, the cell from which prostate cancer arises is still unknown.
The p63 gene is expressed exclusively in the basal cells of several epithelial organs and has been suggested to play a major role in the maintenance of the stem cell compartment in these organs.4,6,7 Here, in a large series of prostate specimens, we confirm that the p63 protein is selectively expressed in the nuclei of basal cells of normal prostate glands. In addition, we show that homozygous inactivation of this gene in the mouse results in prostate agenesis.
Because p63 is selectively expressed in adult prostate basal cells and it is undetectable in adult prostate stromal cells both in vivo and in vitro, the defect in prostate development in p63(-/-) mice is likely ascribed to the epithelial component. However, p63 may be essential for either maintaining a prostate epithelial stem cell population or sustaining a basal cell population, which does not represent a stem cell compartment per se but is essential for prostate development (eg, signaling to the surrounding mesenchyma).
The p63(-/-) mouse is the first engineered animal model demonstrating prostate agenesis. Further manipulation of this animal model will certainly provide a unique tool to study prostate development, differentiation, and neoplastic transformation.
In prostate basal cells grown in vitro, the predominantly
expressed p63 isotype is the
Np63
that lacks the transactivating
domain. This isotype has been shown to act as a dominant-negative on
the transactivation by both TAp63 and
p53.4
We have previously shown that
keratinocytes differentiation in vitro is associated with
down-regulation of the
Np63 transcripts.5
Because
secretory cells do not express p63, we speculate that down-regulation
of the
Np63
isotype may be required for differentiation of basal
cells into secretory cells. These findings are interesting inasmuch as
p53-mediated transcriptional activity increases in a variety of
differentiating cells including muscle cells and keratinocytes, despite
unchanged26
or decreased p53 protein
levels.27
In addition, transfection of mutant
p5327
or dominant-negative
p5326
results in a lack of
p53-dependent transactivation and differentiation,
suggesting that transcription of p53-regulated genes is
necessary for differentiation. However, because terminal
differentiation occurs in p53(-/-) cells,
p53 homologues, including TAp63, may have
overlapping functions to those of p53 in differentiation. Altogether,
these data suggest that relief of the dominant-negative function of
Np63 in basal cells may be necessary for activating the
p53-dependent gene transcription machinery required for
the differentiation of these cells into secretory cells.
We have demonstrated that p63 is not expressed in prostate carcinomas. This finding supports the hypothesis that prostatic carcinomas have a secretory phenotype. Because we have shown that p63 is expressed in virtually all basal cells, including a cell subset negative for HMWCK, p63 immunohistochemistry may be a valuable tool for the differential diagnosis of benign versus malignant prostatic lesions.
In conclusion, the basal cell marker p63 is essential for prostate development in the mouse suggesting that prostate basal cells may represent and/or include prostate stem cells. In addition, because of the universal expression of p63 by basal cells, p63 immunohistochemistry may be a useful adjunct to morphological analysis in the prostate surgical pathology setting.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by grants from CaPCURE, National Cancer Institute (CA, 8175503), and Department of Defense (DAMD 17 98-8574).
Accepted for publication August 22, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Maitland and A. T. Collins Prostate Cancer Stem Cells: A New Target for Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2008; 26(17): 2862 - 2870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lo Iacono, S. Mantero, A. Chiarelli, E. Garcia, A. A. Mills, M. I. Morasso, A. Costanzo, G. Levi, L. Guerrini, and G. R. Merlo Regulation of Dlx5 and Dlx6 gene expression by p63 is involved in EEC and SHFM congenital limb defects Development, April 1, 2008; 135(7): 1377 - 1388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Marchini, M. Marabese, E. Marrazzo, P. Mariani, D. Cattaneo, R. Fossati, A. Compagnoni, R. Fruscio, A. A. Lissoni, and M. Broggini {Delta}Np63 expression is associated with poor survival in ovarian cancer Ann. Onc., March 1, 2008; 19(3): 501 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Wang, R. M. Luque, R. D. Kineman, V. H. Ray, K. T. Christov, D. D. Lantvit, T. Shirai, S. Hedayat, T. G. Unterman, M. C. Bosland, et al. Disruption of Growth Hormone Signaling Retards Prostate Carcinogenesis in the Probasin/TAg Rat Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1366 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Barclay, L. S. Axanova, W. Chen, L. Romero, S. L. Maund, S. Soker, C. J. Lees, and S. D. Cramer Characterization of Adult Prostatic Progenitor/Stem Cells Exhibiting Self-Renewal and Multilineage Differentiation Stem Cells, March 1, 2008; 26(3): 600 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reiner, A. de las Pozas, R. Parrondo, and C. Perez-Stable Progression of Prostate Cancer from a Subset of p63-Positive Basal Epithelial Cells in FG/Tag Transgenic Mice Mol. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 5(11): 1171 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xin, R. U. Lukacs, D. A. Lawson, D. Cheng, and O. N. Witte Self-Renewal and Multilineage Differentiation In Vitro from Murine Prostate Stem Cells Stem Cells, November 1, 2007; 25(11): 2760 - 2769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Yuan, S. Veeramani, and M.-F. Lin Neuroendocrine-like prostate cancer cells: neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of prostate adenocarcinoma cells Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 531 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Wu, S. Altuwaijri, W. A. Ricke, S.-P. Huang, S. Yeh, C. Zhang, Y. Niu, M.-Y. Tsai, and C. Chang Increased prostate cell proliferation and loss of cell differentiation in mice lacking prostate epithelial androgen receptor PNAS, July 31, 2007; 104(31): 12679 - 12684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Patrawala, T. Calhoun-Davis, R. Schneider-Broussard, and D. G. Tang Hierarchical Organization of Prostate Cancer Cells in Xenograft Tumors: The CD44+{alpha}2{beta}1+ Cell Population Is Enriched in Tumor-Initiating Cells Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6796 - 6805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stewart, N. Fleshner, H. Cole, and J. Sweet Comparison of annexin II, p63 and {alpha}-methylacyl-CoA racemase immunoreactivity in prostatic tissue: a tissue microarray study J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2007; 60(7): 773 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Kiviharju-af Hallstrom, S. Jaamaa, M. Monkkonen, K. Peltonen, L. C. Andersson, R. H. Medema, D. M. Peehl, and M. Laiho Human prostate epithelium lacks Wee1A-mediated DNA damage-induced checkpoint enforcement PNAS, April 24, 2007; 104(17): 7211 - 7216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Bruxvoort, H. M. Charbonneau, T. A. Giambernardi, J. C. Goolsby, C.-N. Qian, C. R. Zylstra, D. R. Robinson, P. Roy-Burman, A. K. Shaw, B. D. Buckner-Berghuis, et al. Inactivation of Apc in the Mouse Prostate Causes Prostate Carcinoma Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 67(6): 2490 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, N. C. McKnight, T. Zhang, M. L. Lu, S. P. Balk, and X. Yuan SOX9 Is Expressed in Normal Prostate Basal Cells and Regulates Androgen Receptor Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 528 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P A Humphrey Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsy tissue J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 60(1): 35 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Taghizadeh, M. J. Tang, and I. T. Tai Synergism between vitamin D and secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine-induced apoptosis and growth inhibition results in increased susceptibility of therapy-resistant colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 309 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. V. Litvinov, D. J. Vander Griend, Y. Xu, L. Antony, S. L. Dalrymple, and J. T. Isaacs Low-Calcium Serum-Free Defined Medium Selects for Growth of Normal Prostatic Epithelial Stem Cells. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8598 - 8607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. N. Z. Ramalho, A. Ribeiro-Silva, G. D. Cassali, and S. Zucoloto The Expression of p63 and Cytokeratin 5 in Mixed Tumors of the Canine Mammary Gland Provides New Insights into the Histogenesis of These Neoplasms. Vet. Pathol., July 1, 2006; 43(4): 424 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xin, M. A. Teitell, D. A. Lawson, A. Kwon, I. K. Mellinghoff, and O. N. Witte Progression of prostate cancer by synergy of AKT with genotropic and nongenotropic actions of the androgen receptor PNAS, May 16, 2006; 103(20): 7789 - 7794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Hezel, A. C. Kimmelman, B. Z. Stanger, N. Bardeesy, and R. A. DePinho Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes & Dev., May 15, 2006; 20(10): 1218 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kogan, N. Goldfinger, M. Milyavsky, M. Cohen, I. Shats, G. Dobler, H. Klocker, B. Wasylyk, M. Voller, T. Aalders, et al. hTERT-Immortalized Prostate Epithelial and Stromal-Derived Cells: an Authentic In vitro Model for Differentiation and Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3531 - 3540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wang, A. J. Garcia, M. Wu, D. A. Lawson, O. N. Witte, and H. Wu Pten deletion leads to the expansion of a prostatic stem/progenitor cell subpopulation and tumor initiation PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1480 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Collins, P. A. Berry, C. Hyde, M. J. Stower, and N. J. Maitland Prospective Identification of Tumorigenic Prostate Cancer Stem Cells Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 65(23): 10946 - 10951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dalrymple, L. Antony, Y. Xu, A. R. Uzgare, J. T. Arnold, J. Savaugeot, L. J. Sokoll, A. M. De Marzo, and J. T. Isaacs Role of Notch-1 and E-Cadherin in the Differential Response to Calcium in Culturing Normal versus Malignant Prostate Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9269 - 9279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Signoretti, M. M. Pires, M. Lindauer, J. W. Horner, C. Grisanzio, S. Dhar, P. Majumder, F. McKeon, P. W. Kantoff, W. R. Sellers, et al. p63 regulates commitment to the prostate cell lineage PNAS, August 9, 2005; 102(32): 11355 - 11360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gao, K. Ishii, J. Mirosevich, S. Kuwajima, S. R. Oppenheimer, R. L. Roberts, M. Jiang, X. Yu, S. B. Shappell, R. M. Caprioli, et al. Forkhead box A1 regulates prostate ductal morphogenesis and promotes epithelial cell maturation Development, August 1, 2005; 132(15): 3431 - 3443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Bastian, J. Ellinger, A. Wellmann, N. Wernert, L. C. Heukamp, S. C. Muller, and A. von Ruecker Diagnostic and Prognostic Information in Prostate Cancer with the Help of a Small Set of Hypermethylated Gene Loci Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4097 - 4106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xin, D. A. Lawson, and O. N. Witte The Sca-1 cell surface marker enriches for a prostate-regenerating cell subpopulation that can initiate prostate tumorigenesis PNAS, May 10, 2005; 102(19): 6942 - 6947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D M Peehl Primary cell cultures as models of prostate cancer development Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2005; 12(1): 19 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Berger, P. G. Febbo, P. K. Majumder, J. J. Zhao, S. Mukherjee, S. Signoretti, K. T. Campbell, W. R. Sellers, T. M. Roberts, M. Loda, et al. Androgen-Induced Differentiation and Tumorigenicity of Human Prostate Epithelial Cells Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 8867 - 8875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kurita, R. T. Medina, A. A. Mills, and G. R. Cunha Role of p63 and basal cells in the prostate Development, |