| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |





From the Department of Pathology,*
Albert Einstein
College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; and the Department of
Pathology,
University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have found that the enzyme is concentrated and activated in neurons containing accumulations of mitotic phosphoepitopes in AD. However we have also found, unexpectedly, that the enzyme is present at readily detectable levels in normal adult brain, and displays constitutive activity against exogenous cdc2. In AD, Cdc25A is hyperphosphorylated at the MPM-2 epitope and has higher activity than in control tissue. Our data suggest that Cdc25A participates in the neurodegenerative process in AD.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two antibodies specific for human Cdc25A were used: a polyclonal antibody raised against the full-length human isoform obtained from Upstate Biotechnologies Incorporated (Lake Placid, NY), and a monoclonal antibody recognizing the C-terminal sequence unique to the human enzyme, from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). In support of the specificity of these antibodies for Cdc25A, we have demonstrated that treatment of cultured cells with antisense Cdc25A oligonucleotides eliminates immunoreactivity for Cdc25A with both antibodies. The MPM-2 monoclonal antibody specific for mitotic phosphoepitopes, and antiphosphotyrosine antibody, 4G10, were also from UBI, and the Cdc2-specific mouse monoclonal antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Tissues
A total of 14 controls and 18 AD cases were used for immunocytochemical analysis. The assignment of cases into control or AD groups was based on the plaque and neurofibrillary tangle count and distribution as determined by detailed neuropathological examination. Thirty-µm vibratome sections from nine control and 12 AD cases fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde were supplied by Dr. Dennis Dickson (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY) and 10-µm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were obtained from the tissue data base of the Alzheimer Disease Research Center at the University of Washington, Seattle. Immunocytochemistry was performed as by the method of Vincent and colleagues.3 Some frozen tissue of 21 control and 23 AD cases was provided by Dennis Dickson and the remainder was from the Alzheimer Disease Research Center at the University of Washington, Seattle. The average postmortem interval for the fixed and frozen tissues was 10 hours. Human biopsy brain tissue retrieved by resection of epileptogenic foci from the temporal cortex was supplied by Dr. Diana Casper of the Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY. From each case, a piece of tissue was frozen at -70°C for biochemical analyses and another piece fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for immunocytochemical studies, and the postmortem processing time was <1 hour. The age range for these cases was 19 to 44 years, and histopathological assessment showed no AD-type pathology.
Immunocytochemistry, double immunofluorescence, and confocal microscopy were performed as previously described.2,3
Preparation of Brain and Cell Extracts
Human brain tissue was homogenized with a polytron in 10 volumes
of Triton-X containing lysis buffer.2
The homogenates were
centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C and
the soluble fraction was used as extract for immunoblotting, or for
immunoprecipitation, as described below. For immunoblot analysis, 100
µg of protein was loaded per lane for sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Human M17
neuroblastoma cells (provided by Dr. Robert Ross, Fordham University,
NY) were grown in Dulbeccos modified medium containing 10% fetal
calf serum. Nonsynchronous cultures having
8% of the cells in
mitosis were used for preparation of interphase extracts, and cultures
synchronized with colchicine were used for preparation of mitotic
extracts.1
Harvested cells were homogenized and
detergent-soluble extracts were generated as by the method of Vincent
and colleagues.3
For comparison with human cells of
nonneuronal origin, we used A431 epidermoid carcinoma cell lysates from
UBI.
Immunoprecipitation
For assays of enzyme activity, immunoprecipitation was performed with 100 µg of protein from either brain or cultured cell extract and 0.5 to 1 µg of precipitating antibody. For immunoblot analyses of immune complexes, 500 µg of protein from brain or cell extract was incubated with 3 to 5 µg of appropriate primary antibody on a shaker for 2 hours at 4°C. To bring down the antigen-antibody immune complex, samples were then mixed with 30 µl (for activity assay) or 100 µl (for immunoblotting) of a 50% slurry of protein A Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) for 1 hour, and centrifuged at a speed of 2,500 x g for 5 minutes.2 The beads were washed and reconstituted to original volume either with phosphorylation buffer for activity assays, or with 1x sample buffer for electrophoresis. For immunoblot analyses, the immunoprecipitate (IP) was divided into two equivalent parts for loading into replicate lanes, and staining with different antibodies.
Assay of Cdc25A Activity
Tyr-15-phosphorylated Cdc2 substrate from nonsynchronized neuroblastoma cell extracts was isolated with an agarose-conjugate of Cdc2 mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Cdc25AIP from colchicine-treated mitotic cultures or from biopsy, control, or AD brain was incubated together with the Cdc2 substrate in the presence of phosphatase buffer for 40 minutes at 37°C, with vortexing every 10 minutes. At the end of the incubation, samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with antibody 4G10 to examine dephosphorylation of Tyr-15 in Cdc2.
Densitometric Analysis
Scanned images of electrochemiluminescence or autoradiographic data were quantitated using NIH image software. The scanned data were imported into Microsoft Excel spread sheets (Microsoft, Redmond, WA), and were statistically analyzed using EasyStat software (Hiroshi Tomonari, Tokyo, Japan).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The specificity of the Cdc25A antibodies was first confirmed in
immunoblotting studies (shown in Figure 2
). In paraffin-embedded
hippocampal sections of AD brain, the monoclonal (Figure 1A
, top row) and polyclonal (bottom row)
Cdc25A antibodies displayed overt immunoreactivity with neurons
containing neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) as shown in Figure 1A
, arrows,
b (see inset), c, e, and f. Neuritic components of plaques were also
immunoreactive with both antibodies as shown in Figure 1A, b
(see
inset), c, and e. In the CA1, CA2, and CA4 hippocampal subfields of the
AD cases, large numbers of neurons, with no apparent fibrillar
inclusions, had prominent Cdc25A immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of
the somatodendritic compartment (Figure 1A, c and f
, arrowheads). Based
on the anatomical progression of disease in AD, it has been suggested
that such neurons are engaged in initial stages of
pathology.7,8
Because Cdc25A staining was not observed in
similar neurons of control brain, the positive neurons of AD most
likely represent group 1 neurons with early pathological involvement,
but no evidence yet of fibril formation.23
The cytoplasmic
distribution in these degenerating neurons is however, in contrast to
the predominantly nuclear localization of Cdc25A in dividing
cells.15,16
In control hippocampal (Figure 1A, a and d
,
and corresponding insets) and temporal cortical (not shown) tissues,
neurons appeared devoid of Cdc25A immunoreactivity. Surprisingly,
dividing cells of the brain such as glia or endothelial cells, that
might be expected to contain Cdc25A, were unstained in control and AD
tissues.
|
|
Cdc25A Levels Are Unaltered in AD Brain
Immunoblot analyses were conducted with extracts from autopsy and
biopsy human brain tissue and the two Cdc25A antibodies. The
specificity of these antibodies was confirmed using similar extracts
from A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells (Figure 2
, lane C) and from dividing human
neuroblastoma cultures (lane N). Both antibodies gave similar results
(shown for the polyclonal antibody only), in that they recognized a
70-kd protein in each cell type. Extracts from human biopsy brain
tissue (B) having a short postmortem processing period, also showed a
prominent 70-kd band that co-migrated with the Cdc25A-immnuoreactive
protein from cultured cells. This result suggested that the human brain
isoform is similar to that of neuroblastoma and epidermoid carcinoma
cells. The polyclonal Cdc25A antibody precipitated a 70-kd protein from
biopsy brain extract, and this protein was strongly stained with the
monoclonal antibody (Figure 2
, IP). Immunoblot analyses of extracts
from control and AD autopsy brain tissue displayed a similar 70-kd
protein in all cases (Figure 2)
, but unlike the immunocytochemical data
in Figure 1
, there was no apparent quantitative difference in the two
groups. The 70-kd band was scanned densitometrically, and the amount of
protein in the control and AD cases was compared. There was no
statistical difference between these groups, and in addition, there was
no difference between the amount of Cdc25A in biopsy brain as compared
with the autopsy samples. These data suggest that the Cdc25A protein is
stable postmortem, and that the levels are not different in control and
AD. The absence of Cdc25A immunostaining in control brain may therefore
be because of masking of epitopes or sensitivity of the antigen to
fixation, and the marked increase in AD neurons may reflect a
pathological change in conformation of the protein.
Phosphatase Activity of Cdc25A Is Elevated in AD
Because differences in levels of the Cdc25A phosphatase failed to
explain the selective detection of the enzyme in AD neurons, we
compared the activity of the enzyme in control and AD. We isolated
Cdc25A immunoprecipitates (Cdc25AIPs) from these tissues, and analyzed
their phosphatase activities against exogenous Cdc2 immune-complex
(Cdc2IP) from nonsynchronously growing neuroblastoma cultures. In such
cultures Cdc2 has a higher Tyr-15-phosphorylation content than Cdc2
from mitotic cells, and is therefore a suitable substrate for
dephosphorylation by Cdc25A. Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of
Tyr-15 were monitored by immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine
antibody, 4G10, and Cdc25A activity was estimated by comparative
densitometric analysis of 4G10 immunoreactivity of Cdc2 before and
after incubation with each IP sample. The specificity of 4G10 was
verified by comparing its relative immunoreactivity with Cdc2IP from
nonsynchronously growing (Figure 3c)
and
metaphase-arrested (m) cultures (Figure 3
, first panel). Cdc2IP from
the nonsynchronous cultures showed markedly higher 4G10
immunoreactivity than the isolate from mitotic cell-enriched cultures.
Moreover, the Tyr-15 phosphorylated Cdc2IPc had slower electrophoretic
mobility than the dephosphorylated enzyme (Figure 3
, first panel).
Cdc25AIP from M phase-enriched cultures (mitotic cells, Figure 3
)
effectively dephosphorylated Cdc2 as indicated by a 60% decrease in
4G10 staining (second panel). When preimmune serum was used to IP
instead of Cdc25A antibody, phosphorylation of Cdc2 was unaffected
(lane, PS). The Cdc2 substrate complex alone (second panel, last lane)
did not contain appreciable Tyr-dephosphorylating activity. Incubation
of Cdc2 with Cdc25AIP from biopsy brain resulted in a 37% decrease in
4G10 immunoreactivity (control panel, biop) compared with untreated
Cdc2 (first panel, first lane), suggesting that Cdc25A from control
brain possesses detectable levels of basal activity. This result is
itself in opposition to the historic belief that cell cycle regulatory
proteins are down-regulated and nonfunctional in postmitotic
neurons.24-27
When the activity of the enzyme from
control and AD tissue was compared, it was found that the AD enzyme
displayed activity levels equivalent to that from mitotic neuroblastoma
cells, in that 4G10 immunoreactivity with Cdc2 was decreased by 57%.
This decrease was significantly greater (P <
0.03) than that obtained with Cdc25A from control biopsy or control
autopsy samples. There was no statistical difference between control
biopsy and control cases. To better appreciate the increased activity
in AD relative to control, the Cdc25AIPs were immunoblotted with Cdc25A
monoclonal antibody and the results showed equivalent amounts of the
enzyme immunoprecipitated in all cases (not shown).
|
It has been demonstrated that activation of Cdc25A is itself
regulated by phosphorylation16
and that increased
phosphorylation of the enzyme is accompanied by an increase in
immunoreactivity with the MPM-2 monoclonal antibody.28
Activation of Cdc2 during M phase also culminates in a burst of MPM-2
immunoreactivity,29
a situation recapitulated in
degenerating neurons in AD.1,3,4
We therefore analyzed
MPM-2 immunoreactivity with Cdc25AIPs from control and AD brain tissue.
A marked MPM-2 signal was observed with Cdc25AIP from AD (Figure 4A)
, and controls only showed some weak
electrochemiluminescence on more prolonged exposures (not shown). When
replicate blots were immunostained with the precipitating Cdc25A
antibody (Figure 4B)
, it was clear that the increased MPM-2
immunoreactivity of the AD enzyme was not because of any increase in
amount of enzyme precipitated, but represented an actual increase in
phosphorylation that was consistent with activation of Cdc25A in this
tissue.
|
Previously we had reported an accumulation of MPM-2
immunoreactivity in degenerating neurons of AD brain, whereas normal
neurons appeared negative.1,3
Although part of this
increase may be accounted for by substrates of the Cdc2
kinase,3
the data in Figure 4
above suggested that
activation of Cdc25A might also contribute to increased MPM-2
immunoreactivity in AD. We therefore conducted double-staining studies
of Cdc25A and MPM-2 immunofluorescence followed by confocal microscopic
analysis of AD brain sections. Each antibody specifically labeled
affected neurons in this tissue but not neurons free of pathological
involvement. Cdc25A immunofluorescence was found in the same neurons
immunoreactive with MPM-2 (Figure 5)
. The
subcellular overlap was partial in some cells, implying that the two
antigens are not mutually exclusive. Nevertheless, the combined
presence of Cdc25A and MPM-2 immunoreactive proteins in diseased
neurons and their absence in normal neurons, suggests that Cdc25A might
play a role in activation of mitotic kinase in these cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evidence from the cell cycle literature suggests that Cdc25A is phosphorylated and active during M phase,28 and causes arrest in mitosis when inhibited.14 It has been shown that phosphorylation of Cdc25A in dividing cells is mediated by Cdc2/cyclin B as part of a positive feed-back regulatory loop.16 In light of the co-localization of Cdc25A immunoreactivity and MPM-2 immunoreactivity in AD, it is possible that a similar potentiating effect of Cdc25A occurs in dying neurons, contributing to production of mitotic indices in these cells. Despite activation of Cdc2/cyclin B, cytokinesis of neurons in AD has never been detected in our studies, or in those of other research groups. Cdc2- or Cdc25A-positive cells do not display any signs of chromosomal condensation or spindle formation, implying that the structural phenomena associated with the onset of mitosis do not occur in AD. Thus, although affected postmitotic neurons of AD brain are capable of mitotic gene induction and activation, they fail to undergo mitosis.
The events that precede mitotic activation in neurons are not well understood either. For instance, the possibility that DNA replication precedes M phase changes in neurons has not yet been addressed, although there is evidence for increased immunoreactivity of several G1/S phase markers such as Ki67, p105,and proliferating cell nuclear antigen, in tangle-bearing and pretangled neurons.33,34 In the mammalian cell cycle, the timing of phosphorylation and activation of the Cdc25A phosphatase coincides with activation of the cdk2/cyclin E kinase in S phase, and microinjection of Cdc25A-specific antibodies into human or rat cells blocks cell division at the G1/S transition.15,16,35 Thus, increased expression of Cdc25A in neurons of AD brain might be a more definitive indication of an attempt to restart a cell cycle. Knowledge of agents causing Cdc25A activation and entry into S phase might offer clues to possible effectors of this process in postmitotic neurons as well. For example, it has been shown that the adenovirus E1A oncoprotein and certain growth factors stimulate entry of quiescent cells into S phase, and that the Cdc25A phosphatase mediates this process.15,16,36 In light of this discussion, Cdc25A could serve as a point of convergence for a variety of intrinsic (eg, inherited mutations, oxidative damage) and extrinsic (eg, mitogens, viruses) factors that influence neuronal death. Overall, the similarities between the neurodegenerative signal-transduction mechanism and cell cycle regulation are becoming more apparent, although evidence for the typical ordered progression of the cell division phases is lacking.
Cdc25A activity is also essential for c-myc-induced apoptosis,17,18 although it is unclear how. Cdc2 activation has been implicated as a player in the apoptosis of a variety of cells37-40 including neuronally differentiated PC12 cells.29,41 The issue of whether neurons in AD die by apoptosis is shrouded in debate: one school of thought dwelling on the presence of apoptotic markers in AD,19 and on cultured cell and animal models that show a causal relationship between certain etiological factors for AD and apoptosis42-45 ; and the other focusing on the distinction between the protracted progressive death in AD and the rapid apoptotic process, and on the possibility that DNA fragmentation could result from postmortem autolysis,20 or oxidative damage,21,22 and would therefore not exclusively signify apoptosis. In our studies, the presence of active Cdc25A, Cdc2, and the resulting downstream phosphorylation of neuronal proteins, are observed not only before paired helical filaments accumulate, but also before any morphological abnormalities such as nuclear membrane dissolution or blebbing are evident. The mitotic changes persist until NFT are formed in neurons, which even at this stage do not display any obvious apoptotic changes. It is therefore unlikely that the appearance of mitotic indices in neurons with NFT is associated with an apoptotic mode of death. However, it has been postulated that a fair number of neurons in AD die without forming NFT.46 Given the widespread distribution of Cdc25A and cdc2/cyclin B3 in AD, it is possible that cdc2-mediated mechanisms drive such neurons into an apoptotic crisis.
A notable difference in the cell-cycle process of degenerating neurons is that the site of activation of cell-cycle regulators is in the neuronal cytoplasm, whereas the nucleus47,48 is their site of activation in cycling cells. This difference in subcellular location alone might account for the different outcomes of mitotic activation in the two situations, ie, degeneration versus mitosis. There are instances where Cdc25 functions in the cytoplasm, and studies have implicated the family of 14-3-3 proteins in these instances. The DNA damage checkpoint that prevents mitosis while DNA repair is underway is one example where the Rad24 14-3-3 protein facilitates nuclear export and hence cytoplasmic build-up of inactive Cdc25A.49,50 In AD neurons the high levels of DNA damage19,51,52 and accumulation of Cdc25A in the neuronal cytoplasm resemble this situation, but Cdc25A is activated, rather than inhibited, making it unlikely that neuronal death in AD involves DNA damage-induced arrest. Another instance where Cdc25A functions in a cytoplasmic location is in association with the Raf-1 protein kinase after mitogenic stimulation of quiescent cells.53 14-3-3 promotes Cdc25A phosphorylation and activation by Raf-1, an interaction that links mitogenic signaling with the cell cycle machinery.53 Interestingly, various isoforms of 14-3-3 are particularly abundant in brain, functioning in a variety of neuronal processes such as regulation of protein kinase C, exocytosis, and synaptic plasticity,54 and their presence in neurofibrillary tangles has also been reported.55 Thus 14-3-3 may act to sequester activated Cdc25A in the cytoplasm of neurons, eventually causing degeneration. A closer look at the 14-3-3 proteins in AD brain might help uncover the signaling pathways leading to mitotic activation in neurons and to neurodegeneration.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by grants AG12721, and P50 AG 0513616 (ADRC, Murray Raskind, PI) from the National Institute on Aging.
Accepted for publication September 8, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Mosch, M. Morawski, A. Mittag, D. Lenz, A. Tarnok, and T. Arendt Aneuploidy and DNA Replication in the Normal Human Brain and Alzheimer's Disease J. Neurosci., June 27, 2007; 27(26): 6859 - 6867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, D. Qu, E. J. Morris, M. J. O'Hare, S. M. Callaghan, R. S. Slack, H. M. Geller, and D. S. Park The Chk1/Cdc25A Pathway as Activators of the Cell Cycle in Neuronal Death Induced by Camptothecin. J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8819 - 8828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Delobel, I. Lavenir, B. Ghetti, M. Holzer, and M. Goedert Cell-Cycle Markers in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Human Tauopathy: Increased Levels of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 168(3): 878 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D'Ambrosio, S. Arena, G. Fulcoli, M. H. Scheinfeld, D. Zhou, L. D'Adamio, and A. Scaloni Hyperphosphorylation of JNK-interacting Protein 1, a Protein Associated with Alzheimer Disease Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2006; 5(1): 97 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. McCain, L. Wu, P. Nickel, M. U. Kassack, A. Kreimeyer, A. Gagliardi, D. C. Collins, and Z.-Y. Zhang Suramin Derivatives as Inhibitors and Activators of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 2004; 279(15): 14713 - 14725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Shulman and M. B. Feany Genetic Modifiers of Tauopathy in Drosophila Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1233 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Qu, J. N. Weiss, and W. R. MacLellan Regulation of the mammalian cell cycle: a model of the G1-to-S transition Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2003; 284(2): C349 - C364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Lazo, K. Nemoto, K. E. Pestell, K. Cooley, E. C. Southwick, D. A. Mitchell, W. Furey, R. Gussio, D. W. Zaharevitz, B. Joo, et al. Identification of a Potent and Selective Pharmacophore for Cdc25 Dual Specificity Phosphatase Inhibitors. Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2002; 61(4): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |