| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Article |
From the Division of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The recruitment of immune cells to mucosal sites is highly regulated, and the subsets of immune cells that enter the epithelium play a key role in immune surveillance and local mucosal immune responses. Neutrophils and eosinophils traverse the basement membrane and the epithelial compartment predominantly in a basal-to-apical direction, accumulating in the airway lumen, as evidenced by their presence in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.1-3 In contrast, intraepithelial T lymphocytes and dendritic antigen-presenting cells (APCs) cross the epithelial basement membrane in both basal-to-apical and apical-to-basal directions.4,5 Although the basal and columnar cells that make up the bronchial epithelium do not pass through the basement membrane, they will readily migrate across it to cover areas of damage.6
As well as providing structural support, the basement membrane can facilitate adhesion and migration of epithelial cells through interaction with extracellular matrix proteins.7 The basement membrane is also required for the establishment of the correct epithelial polarity and can modulate the phenotype of epithelial cells.8,9 The upper basement membrane layers, the lamina lucida (which is considered an artifact of current preparatory techniques), and the lamina densa are synthesized predominantly by epithelial cells, whereas the lower, thicker lamina reticularis is of fibroblastic origin.10-12 The combination of the lamina lucida and lamina densa forms the basal lamina. All layers comprise collagens, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans, although the composition varies between layers.13
Conventionally, infiltrating immune cells are thought to cross the basement membrane by localized digestion. This would be facilitated by the release of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), particularly the gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 and stored granule proteases.14-17 However, in intestinal and conjunctival epithelia, holes in the basement membrane, termed pores, have been identified, indicating an alternative mechanism for the migration of cells into and out of the epithelium.18-20 Furthermore, a recent report by Evans and colleagues using rat tracheal preparations has described "openings" in the lamina reticularis layer of the basement membrane.21
The identification of basement membrane pores in conducting airways in this study provides a novel model for improving our understanding of cell trafficking between the epithelium and the underlying mesenchyme. Basement membrane pores would allow enhanced movement between epithelial and mesenchymal compartments without enzymatic disruption of the basement membrane and could facilitate interaction between inflammatory cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rings of primary or lobar bronchus were excised from grossly normal areas of bronchial tissue after lung cancer resection and stored in Leibowitz (L15) medium (Gibco, Paisley, UK) at 4°C overnight.
A total of 10 samples underwent the epithelial stripping procedure, following a method modified for bronchial tissue from Mahida et al.19 Tissue was washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove excess mucus, and the unstripped samples were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate/0.23 mol/L sucrose buffer for a minimum of 1 hour for electron microscopy. Samples for stripping were first incubated in 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol (DTT; Sigma, Poole, UK) in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Following this, tissue was incubated in Ca2+/Mg2+-free Hanks balanced salt solution (Gibco) for 10 minutes at 37°C and then 10 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA; Sigma) in PBS for 30 minutes at 37°C. This was repeated twice, before culture or fixation in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate/0.23 mol/L sucrose buffer. For three samples, the technique was further modified by using a 13-mm round glass coverslip to gently stroke the airway surface at the end of each 30-minute incubation. Eight samples stripped of epithelium were cultured in M199 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 2% Ultroser G serum replacement (Gibco) for a maximum of 48 hours.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (EM) Preparation
Fixed tissue was transferred to 0.1 mol/L cacodylate/0.23 mol/L sucrose buffer and dehydrated through a graded series of alcohols. The tissue underwent critical point drying with CO2 using a Balzers critical point drier (Balzers, Liechtenstein). Dried specimens were glued onto metal stubs and sputter-coated with a platinum/gold mixture. Scanning EM was performed on a Hitachi S800 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) scanning electron microscope. Representative micrographs were taken of each sample.
Transmission EM Preparation
Fixed tissue was transferred to 0.1 mol/L cacodylate/0.23 mol/L sucrose buffer before 2 hours postfixation in 2% osmium tetroxide in cacodylate/sucrose buffer. The tissue was then incubated in 1.5% aqueous uranyl acetate for 30 minutes at room temperature before dehydration through a series of graded alcohols and embedding in Spurr resin, following a standard protocol. A suitable area of epithelium in transverse section was selected and ultrathin sections were cut using a diamond knife on an Ultracut ultramicrotome (Leica, Milton Keynes, UK) set to 90 nm. Sections were dried onto copper grids, stained with lead citrate, and examined on a Hitachi H7000 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi). The full length of the basement membrane of each section was scanned for pores, and all pores were photographed.
Pore Counts and Analysis
Three scanning EM photographs (x500 magnification) were taken of stripped basement membrane from each sample. Pores were counted and the area of stripped basement membrane measured by image analysis (Scion Image PC, Scion Corp., Frederick, MD). Pore counts were represented as pores/mm2 of basement membrane. The minimum and maximum diameter of each pore was determined using a magnifying eyepiece with a 20-mm scale bar and converted back to original size.
Nearest neighbor distances were calculated by measuring the distance between each individual pore and its five nearest neighbors. After ranking the results in order of distance, Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics were applied to test for differences in the spatial arrangement of the pores from a normal distribution, using the SPSS statistical program v.9 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transmission EM of undamaged bronchial epithelium revealed basal
cells attached to the basement membrane and ciliated columnar cells and
nonciliated secretory cells suprabasal to these (Figure 1A)
. The complete basement membrane
consisted of the lamina densa, a thin afibrous and agranular layer,
whereas the lamina reticularis extended below contained fibrous
collagen cut in mostly transverse section (Figure 1B)
. A boundary was
evident between the acellular lamina reticularis and the cellular
lamina propria, which included infiltrating cells (Figure 1A)
.
|
The basement membrane had a complex topography with an undulating
structure of ridges and grooves a few micrometers across. Holes in the
basement membrane were seen, clearly distinct from these ridges and
grooves (Figure 2)
. These were
approximately oval, larger than the ridges, and were seen by scanning
EM to penetrate into the basement membrane. The junction between the
surface of the basement membrane and the internal structure of the pore
was clearly delineated, and a collagen-like fibrous network lining the
pore was revealed at higher magnifications (Figure 2
, inset). Although
identification of the fibers was not possible by scanning EM, they
appeared to surround the cylindrical pore in concentric rings. Pores
were subsequently identified as oval holes with clear penetration of
the basement membrane.
|
|
To study the basement membrane pores effectively, a stripping
procedure using DTT and EDTA to chelate Ca2+ and
break disulfide bonds, adapted from the method of Mahida et al, was
used to remove covering epithelial cells from the basement
membrane.19
Low-magnification scanning EM examination of
samples stripped in this manner showed patchy loss of the epithelium;
in some areas, columnar but not basal cells were lost, and in others,
the epithelium was removed to the level of the basement membrane. As
this technique did not yield extensive areas of denuded basement
membrane, further mechanical removal of epithelial cells was
facilitated by using a circular glass coverslip. After this procedure,
all samples showed extensive loss of basal and columnar cells, with
epithelial cells remaining only in the deeper crevices of the
epithelium. Scanning EM of basement membrane after stripping using a
coverslip (Figure 4)
was
indistinguishable from unstripped basement membrane samples after
unintentional loss of epithelial cells (Figure 2)
. Moreover, by light
microscopy of sections, neither sample showed any differences in the
overall morphology of the basement membrane or lamina propria after DTT
or EDTA treatment (results not shown).
|
Three scanning EM micrographs of stripped samples at the same magnification were analyzed for each of 10 different individuals. The mean pore count was 863 pores/mm2 (range, 208-2337; SD = 404 pores/mm2) with 95% confidence limits of 718-1009 pores/mm2, indicating that the variation in pore density between samples was low. Measurement of pore diameters showed that the mean diameter of the pore was 1.76 µm (range, 0.63.85 µm; SD = 0.67 µm). Variation in pore size was also low, with 95% confidence limits of 1.701.81 µm for the overall mean pore size. Pore diameter from transmission EM sections revealed a similar width distribution, with a mean pore diameter of 2.08 µm and a range of 0.62 to 4.2 µm. The mean distance between a pore and its nearest neighbor was 12.8 µm (range, 4.031.8 µm; SD = 5.25 µm). No significant difference was found on comparison of distribution of nearest neighbor measurements with a normal distribution.
Functional Use of Basement Membrane Pores
Epithelial cells remaining on the basement membrane after culture
exhibited a flattened morphology with the features of the basement
membrane visible below the cells, which was consistent with a
dedifferentiated epithelium performing epithelial restitution (Figure 5A)
. This contrasted with the rounded
appearance of nonepithelial cells after the same length of culture
(Figure 5, A and B)
.
|
This pattern of cells traversing the basement membrane through basement
membrane pores occurred not only in samples where the epithelium had
been removed, but also in intact samples that had been left untreated
(Figure 6, A and B)
. Transmission EM
images of unstripped and uncultured bronchial epithelium showed cells
apparently moving between the lamina propria and the epithelium through
the basement membrane pores. These pores, lined with collagen cut in a
transverse section, confirmed the scanning EM images of concentric
fibers lining the lumen of the pore (Figure 2
, insert). The cell in
Figure 6B
exhibited the hourglass morphology typical of a cell
migrating through a narrow gap from a channel at the lamina
reticularis/lamina propria boundary. Figure 6A
shows a cell with the
nucleus polarized to one end, apparently migrating in the direction of
the epithelium.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pores were of a size, frequency, and distribution consistent with a role in normal inflammatory cell movement across the epithelial basement membrane. Their presence in basement membranes has been shown previously in colonic mucosa.19 Using a chemical stripping method adapted from this study, we observed similar pores at a density of 863 pores/mm2. Analysis of the airway after the initial DTT incubation showed loss of ciliated and nonciliated columnar cells. To remove the basal epithelial cells required a further three incubations of EDTA with light scraping with a glass coverslip to aid detachment. The requirement for a scraping step in addition to the original method may reflect the pseudostratified structure of the bronchial epithelium or simply the greater resilience of bronchial epithelium to chemical disruption. Neither the chemical incubations nor the use of a coverslip appeared to cause any damage to the basement membrane or the underlying tissue.
The pores evident by scanning EM of stripped samples were similar in diameter to those reported previously to be present in colonic mucosa and, after analysis of nearest neighbor distances, were found to be scattered randomly across the basement membrane.19 The nearest neighbor distance of 12.8 µm suggested that cells would not be more than 6.5 µm away from a pore and therefore, with the average diameter of an epithelial cell at approximately 5 µm, each pore may serve a total of seven epithelial cells. The relatively wide spacing of the pores, clearly distinguishable by scanning EM because of the wide field of view, probably explains why pores have not been reported previously by transmission EM studies, despite much previous literature about the ultrastructure of the respiratory tract in health and disease.
Pores may arise as a consequence of the proteolysis of basement membrane previously proposed to occur during trans-basement membrane migration.16,17 An alternative hypothesis is that pores are an intrinsic structure of the basement membrane and are used predominantly or exclusively as migration portals into the epithelium. Consistent with this latter view, EM confirmed that pores penetrated the full depth of the basement membrane. The lamina densa layers of the basement membrane ended at the intersection with the pore; thereafter, collagen-like fibers were found, in transverse section, lining the lateral edges of the pore through the lamina reticularis. This correlated with scanning EM images showing that fibers ran in concentric circles lining the internal surface of the pore. The pore finally ended at the junction of the lamina reticularis and lamina propria, where channels could be found running parallel to the pore at the lamina reticularis/lamina propria boundary. Cells were frequently found within these channels. These observations correlate with findings in rat trachea, where the lamina reticularis was defined as a fibrous mat of predominantly collagen III with large and small openings to allow contact with fibroblasts in the lamina propria.21
After culture for 24 hours, cells were seen in what appeared to be the early and late stages of migration through basement membrane pores. In colonic mucosa, cells were reported to pass through pores only when the epithelium had been removed and there was no report of migration into intact epithelium.19 In the current study, transmission electron micrographs show cells appearing as if they were in the process of crossing the basement membrane into undamaged epithelium. Each cell appears within a clearly identified pore, lined with collagen-like fibrils with cellular contact established at one side of the pore only. Examples of scanning EM during the early stages of migration showed thin cell processes within identifiable pores, indicating the presence of the pore before migration. At no time were epithelial cells or epithelial cell processes observed within basement membrane pores, and the cells migrating through the basement membrane pores did not conform to the morphological characteristics of basal cells after 24 hours culture. Thus, basement membrane pores in respiratory epithelium appear to be selective portals for infiltrating cells in the presence or absence of damage to the epithelium.
Inflammatory cell migration into the bronchial epithelium is a characteristic feature of respiratory inflammatory diseases, especially asthma. As well as an increase in the density of eosinophils, mast cells, and T lymphocytes in the lung tissues from asthmatic patients, such cells are also found in higher numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.3 The resolution of eosinophilic inflammation in the airway is thought to involve movement of eosinophils into the lumen and their apoptosis.23 Basement membrane pores would allow rapid inflammatory cell trans-epithelial migration into the airway lumen, without requiring enzymatic degradation of the basement membrane. The enhanced basal-to-apical movement of eosinophils during resolution suggests that basement membrane pores could provide a selective gateway for access to the airway lumen, whereas the residual eosinophils may be lost by other mechanisms such as cytolysis.23
Movement of professional APCs into the epithelium is also important in regulating the immune response. Dendritic APCs are resident in the lung for approximately 3 days, entering the lung in an immature form to monitor the environment, capturing antigen, and thereafter migrating from the lung to the local lymph nodes, maturing as they do so.5 Persistent pores within the basement membrane could form an integral part of a predefined network of routes between epithelial, vascular, and lymphatic systems, the channels observed at the boundary of the lamina reticularis and basement membrane being representative of this. Similar routes have been described in lymph node architecture between the vasculature and lymphatics, with a system of conduits and corridors allowing maximal contact between APCs and migrating lymphocytes.24 Such routes in the bronchial epithelium could enhance dendritic cell/T cell and T cell/inflammatory cell interactions within the lamina propria. Cell contact would occur frequently as one cell type exits the epithelium and others enter.
The existence of such a predefined network of routes would facilitate the operation of mechanisms analogous to those seen in leukocyte trans-endothelial migration.25 Leukocytes enter the tissue from the vascular system by attachment at sites of altered selectin and integrin expression and the presence of local chemoattractant stimuli.25 In a similar fashion, leukocytes from the vasculature could travel by haplotaxis along routes in the lamina propria distinguished by chemokine gradients and their ability to act as substrates for cell adhesion via integrins. In response to the local mediator environment, final trans-basement membrane migration could be initiated by altered integrin expression on infiltrating cells interacting with unique combinations of matrix components on the lateral edges of the basement membrane pore.
In summary, pores are present in the basement membrane of bronchial epithelium. These pores are lined with matrix material and allow the cells from the lamina propria to cross into the epithelium without degradation of the basement membrane. Pores with some permanence within the basement membrane could allow the generation of routes within the lamina propria leading to the pore. They could act as selective conduits between epithelial and mesenchymal compartments, thus enhancing the speed and ease of cellular access to the epithelium.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by Medical Research Council program grant no. G8604034 (to S. T. H.).
Accepted for publication October 27, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Hotary, X.-Y. Li, E. Allen, S. L. Stevens, and S. J. Weiss A cancer cell metalloprotease triad regulates the basement membrane transmigration program Genes & Dev., October 1, 2006; 20(19): 2673 - 2686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. Sirianni, A. Milaninezhad, F. S. F. Chu, and D. C. Walker Alteration of Fibroblast Architecture and Loss of Basal Lamina Apertures in Human Emphysematous Lung Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2006; 173(6): 632 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Evans, M. V. Fanucchi, G. L. Baker, L. S. Van Winkle, L. M. Pantle, S. J. Nishio, E. S. Schelegle, L. J. Gershwin, L. A. Miller, D. M. Hyde, et al. Atypical development of the tracheal basement membrane zone of infant rhesus monkeys exposed to ozone and allergen Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): L931 - L939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. JEFFERY Remodeling in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2001; 164(10): S28 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |