| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |


From the Laboratory of Immunogenetics,*
Renal Division,
Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts; the Department of Medicine and Institute of Human Gene
Therapy,
University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the Department of Internal
Medicine,
Pundang CHA General Hospital,
Pochon CHA University, Pochon, Korea; Parexel
International,§
Waltham, Massachusetts; and
Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research
Institute,¶
Princeton, New Jersey
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We are currently investigating the role of the CD4+ T cell in the initiation and coordination of the immune response underlying chronic rejection. T lymphocytes require two signals to become fully activated: an antigen-dependent signal induced by ligation of the T cell receptor and a costimulatory signal induced predominantly by ligation of T cell CD28 with a member of the B7 family of molecules (CD80 or CD86) on antigen-presenting cells.4 Ligation of CD28 is necessary for maximal CD4+ T cell cytokine production, proliferation and prevention of activation-induced apoptosis. CD80 and CD86 are the only ligands for T cell CD28 and interactions between both ligands and CD28 are interrupted by CTLA4Ig,5 a recombinant fusion protein that contains the extracellular domain of human CTLA4, a homologue of CD28, fused to a human IgG1 heavy chain. Blockade of CD28-B7 interactions using CTLA4Ig prevents CD4+ T cell activation in response to alloantigen and leads to antigen-specific T cell anergy.6 CTLA4Ig is effective in preventing allograft rejection and inducing transplantation tolerance in several experimental transplant models.7 Thus, costimulatory blockade using CTLA4Ig provides an experimental tool to examine the role of T cell activation in the initiation and progression of chronic allograft rejection.
We have previously shown that inhibition of T cell activation early after transplantation by blocking T cell costimulation with CTLA4Ig results in long term survival in the majority of grafts and prevents the development of graft arteriosclerosis in the LEW to F344 rat heterotopic cardiac transplant model.2,8 In these studies, we wished to determine the role of continued T cell activation on the progression of chronic rejection in this model by examining the effects of late T cell costimulation blockade. Furthermore, we used the mutant form of CTLA4Ig, Y100F, to determine the effects of selective CD80 blockade at early and late time points post-transplant in the development of chronic rejection.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inbred adult male LEW and F344 rats were purchased from Harlan
Sprague-Dawley (Indianapolis, IN). F344 rats served as recipients of
LEW cardiac allografts. Hearts were transplanted to the infrarenal
great vessels by standard microvascular techniques as described
previously2,9
under ether anesthesia. F344-to-F344 and
LEW-to-LEW isografts served as controls. Graft function was monitored
by daily palpation of the transplanted heart; time of rejection was
defined as the day of complete cessation of myocardial contraction.
Allografts were harvested routinely at day 120 or after rejection.
Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan Meier test and the
log rank test was used to compare differences in survival between
groups. CTLA4Ig, mutant CTLA4Ig Y100F and control fusion protein L6
(Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Princeton,
NJ)10
were used to study the role of CD28-B7 T cell
costimulatory molecule blockade on the course of chronic rejection.
Y100F is a mutant form of CTLA4Ig that selectively binds CD80. Figure 1
shows the dose and time course of
treatment in each group.
|
Coronal sections of graft tissue were fixed in 10% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with Verhoeffs elastin (arteriosclerosis scoring) or Massons trichrome (fibrosis and infiltrate scoring). Arteriosclerosis was assessed by light microscopy and percentage luminal occlusion by intimal thickening determined using the scoring system (scale, 05) described by Adams et al.11 All arteries seen were examined and scored by two blinded examiners. A total of 325 vessels were analyzed with an average of 14 scored per graft. Only vessels that were cut orthogonally and displayed a clear internal elastic lamina were scored.
Matched trichrome-stained sections were also scored by a pathologist (RM) blinded for the treatment groups to look for fibrosis, interstitial cellular infiltration, and vasculitis. Each of these categories was graded, and the average grade was calculated for each group. Fibrosis was quantified by collagen deposition highlighted by trichrome stain and scored on a 03 scale where 0 indicated no fibrosis, and 1, 2, and 3 indicated mild, moderate, and severe fibrosis, respectively. A scale of 04 was used for scoring the degree of interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration, where 0 indicated no cellular infiltration and 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicated minimal, mild, moderate, and severe cellular infiltration, respectively. Vasculitis was assessed by the degree of inflammatory cell adhesion to the endothelial surface and infiltration of the muscle layer, which was scored 0 (up to 10% of all vessels were involved), 1 (1050%), or 2 (>50%).
Nonparametric statistical tests were used to compare arteriosclerosis scores and fibrosis scores. The Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test was used to assess variance between groups and Dunns Post test was then used to determine differences between individual groups.
Isolation of RNA and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissue specimens using the Ultraspec RNA isolation system (Biotecx, Houston, TX) and was quantified by spectrophotometry. cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription of 5 µg of RNA using random hexamer primers (100 ng/µl) and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (50 u/µl) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) in a 50-µl reaction. Ten microliters of cDNA were used for each PCR amplification reaction. PCR was performed with Taq DNA polymerase using the buffer supplied by the manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Primers and PCR conditions used were, for monocyte chemotactic peptide-1(MCP-1): 5'-ATGCAGGTCTCTGTCACG-3' and 3'-CTAGTTCTCTGTCATACT-5' (50°C, 28 cycles); for inducible nitric oxide synthase: 5'-TGCCAGGGTCACAACTTTACAGG-3' and 3'-GGTCGATGTCACATGCAGCTTGTC-5' (60°C, 35 cycles); and for transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) 5'-TGAACCAAGGAGACGGAATACAGG-3' and 3'-TACTGTGTGTCCAGGCTCCAAATG-5' (57°C, 26 cycles; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA). The PCR conditions were 94°C for 30 seconds, 5060°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 2 minutes. PCR products were analyzed by ethidium bromide staining in 1.5% agarose gels using standard techniques. The densitometric band densities were measured using computerized imaging software (ALpha-Imager, version 0.1.12, Alpha Innotech Corp, San Leandro, CA). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene products were simultaneously measured and used to correct for variations in cDNA amounts between samples.2,12
Rat Carotid Balloon Injury Model
Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats (275300 g) underwent endothelial denudation of the left carotid artery (Zivic Miller, Zelienople, PA).13 Rats were randomized to daily i.p. injections of 1 mg CTLA4Ig (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Seattle, WA) diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (1 mg/ml) or vehicle control for 14 days, beginning on the day of injury. On day 14, the left (injured) and right (uninjured) carotids were dissected and removed. The center piece of the carotid artery was fixed in methyl carnoys and embedded in paraffin. Four-micron sections were treated with Verhoeffs stain to identify the elastic lamina.14 Using Scion Image 1.55, morphometric analysis was completed on elastin-stained sections by measuring the area of the lumen (L), internal elastic lamina (IEL), and external elastic lamina (EEL). These measurements were then used to determine the percentage of luminal occlusion, (IEL-L/IEL) x 100, and intima-to-media ratio, IEL/(EEL-IEL). The measurements were tabulated for three separate sections per carotid. Mean scores were pooled for the two subgroups and are reported as the mean levels ± SD. Results were subjected to analysis of variance to evaluate significant differences between CTLA4Ig and control groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously shown that a single injection of CTLA4Ig on day
2 post-transplantation prevented development of graft arteriosclerosis
in the LEW into F344 model of chronic cardiac allograft
rejection.2
We now report the effects of late CD28-B7
blockade by administration of CTLA4Ig starting on day 30 or 60
post-transplantation. This is a clinically relevant strategy, because
it addresses the issue of interruption of progression of chronic
rejection and the therapy of established disease. Illustrated in Figure 2
is the percentage of survival of
allografts within each experimental group plotted against time. Whereas
approximately 50% of grafts from the control group 3 rejected before
120 days, all isografts and the majority of grafts from CTLA4Ig-treated
animals (groups 1 and 2) survived to >120 days (time of harvest;
P < 0.05 by Kaplan Meier). Thus, blocking T cell
costimulation by CTLA4Ig late after acute graft injury was effective in
preventing chronic graft loss.
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence suggests that CD80 and CD86 may have functionally distinct roles in T cell activation. In general, CD86 is constitutively expressed and rapidly up-regulated on antigen-presenting cells, whereas CD80 is not usually expressed until after prolonged (72 hours) stimulation. These differences may suggest that CD86 is important in mediating initial T cell alloactivation and CD80 is important in perpetuation of the immune response, although this has not been established in an experimental transplant model.
To examine the effects of interrupting CD80-mediated T cell
costimulation at early and late time points post-transplantation in
this model, we used the mutant CTLA4Ig Y100F, an agent that selectively
binds CD80. Administration of Y100F (0.5 mg i.p.) as a single dose on
day 2 or as repeated twice-weekly doses post-transplantation did not
prolong graft survival (Figure 5A)
. This
is in striking contrast to the effects of CTLA4Ig (0.5 mg i.p.) given
on day 2, which resulted in prolonged graft survival (>100 days) in
over 60% of recipients.14
We next examined whether late
administration of Y100F was effective in attenuating chronic rejection
in this model. In these experiments we compared Y100F to CTLA4Ig in a
modified "interruption" treatment protocol consisting of
twice-weekly injections of Y100F from day 30 to day 60. In contrast to
the lack of efficacy of Y100F early post-transplantation, we find that
Y100F is as effective as CTLA4Ig when given late post-transplantation
in interrupting chronic rejection. Illustrated in Figure 5B
is the
percentage survival of allografts in Y100F-treated (group 8),
CTLA4Ig-treated (group 9), and control L6-treated groups (group 10).
Both Y100F and CTLA4Ig result in a significant prolongation of
allograft survival (P < 0.05).
|
in grafts from
Y100F animals. This may reflect either a deviation from Th1
differentiation with CD80 blockade or simply a reduction in immune cell
infiltration.
|
|
Effect of Blocking T Cell Costimulation on the Development of Intimal Proliferation in a Rat Carotid Balloon Injury Model
We next wished to confirm that the effects of CTLA4Ig were a direct consequence of prevention of T cell costimulation/activation rather than a nonspecific anti-inflammatory effect or an effect on monocytes/macrophages or endothelial cell activation that is independent of T cell activation. To address this issue, we studied the effect of CTLA4Ig on the development of arteriosclerosis in a vascular endothelial injury model where activated T lymphocytes do not play a role in the pathogenesis of lesion formation. In this model, rat carotid arteries undergo endothelial injury by balloon angioplasty. The animals develop arteriosclerosis secondary to endothelial and monocyte/macrophage activation. Carotid arteries from CTLA4Ig and control saline-treated animals were analyzed histologically and percentage of luminal occlusion determined as described above in Methods.13 Mean percent luminal occlusion was 56 ± 12% in CTLA4Ig-treated rats compared to 49 ± 25% in saline-treated rats (P = 0.44). Intima-to-media ratios were also similar: 1.2 ± 0.3 in CTLA4Ig-treated rats compared with 0.9 ± 0.4 in saline-treated group (P = n.s.). Thus, blockade of T cell costimulation did not inhibit the development of intimal thickening in this model.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this report we have shown that blocking T cell costimulation late post-transplantation, after initial graft injury, interrupts the development of chronic cardiac allograft rejection, evidenced by reduced graft arteriosclerosis, interstitial infiltration and fibrosis, and improved graft survival. These data suggest that ongoing T cell recognition of alloantigen and activation is an important component of the chronic rejection process.18 Although there is no question that persistent macrophage activity is crucial in the pathogenesis of these lesions, the continuing role of T cells has been less certain.19-21 In support of a role for continued T cell activation, Chandraker et al interrupted the development of chronic graft dysfunction and glomerulosclerosis with T cell costimulatory blockade in a rat model of chronic renal allograft rejection.18 Taken together, these findings suggest that chronic rejection proceeds as a result of continuous immune stimulation rather than an irreversible cascade of events arising from initial injury.22 More importantly, these data show that that chronic allograft rejection may be amenable to modification by T cell costimulatory blockade even after the process has been initiated.
This study further defines the individual functions of CD80 and CD86 in alloimmune responses. Both CD80 and CD86 deliver potent signals through the T cell molecule CD28. CD28 ligation optimizes T cell interleukin-2 production in the presence of antigen stimulation and prevents T cell apoptosis.23 CD80 and CD86 also bind CTLA4, an Ig superfamily member with homology to CD28, which delivers a negative signal to activated T cells.24 However, CD80 and CD86 share only 25% amino acid homology, have distinct binding kinetics to CD28 and CTLA4,25 and differ in their spatial and temporal expression. These differences have led to the suggestion that CD80 and CD86 are functionally distinct; this appears to be corroborated by differential effects of blocking CD80 and CD86 in experimental models of autoimmunity and transplantation.26
We find that blocking CD80 costimulation at early time points post-transplantation does not effect graft survival, whereas combined blockade leads to long term graft survival and inhibition of chronic rejection in the majority of recipients. This suggests either that CD86 is the dominant costimulatory molecule responsible for inducing initial alloactivation of T cells in this model or that both costimulatory molecules must be blocked to inhibit T cell activation. It is likely that CD86 is dominant early post-transplantation because it is expressed at earlier time points than CD80 in alloimmune responses. In a mouse model of cardiac transplantation, strong expression of CD86 was seen at 24 hours post-transplantation, whereas CD80 was not detected until day 3.27 Pearson et al found that both anti-CD80 mAbs and anti-CD86 mAbs modestly prolonged allograft survival, whereas combined blockade was most effective.28 Studies using CD80 knockout mice have supported these findings.29
In contrast, late blockade of CD80 resulted in prolonged graft survival
and a striking reduction in the histological features of chronic
rejection (mononuclear cell infiltration, parenchymal fibrosis, and
graft arteriosclerosis). Indeed, Y100F was as good, if not more
effective, than CTLA4Ig in this regard. This suggests that CD80 is the
dominant costimulatory molecule mediating T cell activation in chronic
rejection in this model. This may be due to either preferential
expression or unique functional characteristics of this molecule in
chronic rejection. A dominant cell type in chronically rejecting grafts
is the monocyte/macrophage. In addition to causing tissue destruction,
monocyte/macrophages express class II MHC and costimulatory molecules
and may be responsible for mediating persistent
CD4+ T cell activation required for maintenance
of the rejection response. A recent report shows that although
activated human monocytes express both CD80 and CD86, only CD80 is
functional in inducing CD4+ T cell proliferation
and interferon-
production.30
Furthermore, some
evidence suggests that CD80 predominantly costimulates Th1
differentiation whereas CD86 costimulates Th2
differentiation.31
Long term graft survival and tolerance
induction in the LEW-to-F344 cardiac transplant model is associated
with deviation of the cytokine profile within the graft from a Th-1 to
Th-2 pattern.32
Thus, we speculate that advantage of
isolated CD80 blockade compared to combined CD80 and CD86 blockade may
be to allow for CD4+ T cell differentiation into
the Th2 pathway. Consistent with these observations, we find reduced
levels of interferon-
in grafts from Y100F-treated recipients
(Figure 6c)
. Interleukin-4 transcript levels were low and similar in
control and Y100F-treated groups (data not shown). In this study we
have not assessed the role of CD154-CD40 interactions in chronic
rejection, although this is an area of current investigation in our
laboratory. Ligation of CD40 on antigen-presenting cells induces
expression of CD80 and CD86, and CD154-CD40 interactions are important
in facilitating B cell antibody production, an important effector
mechanism in chronic rejection.18
Finally, we show that blockade of T cell costimulation has no effect on the development of intimal thickening in a model of mechanical injury-induced arteriosclerosis. Arterial intimal thickening after balloon catheter injury is a rapid process involving migration of smooth muscle cells into the intima, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and matrix production. These events are initiated by growth factors released by damaged endothelium and by activated monocytes/macrophages and platelets, but not by activated T cells, thus accounting for the lack of efficacy of CTLA4Ig in this model. These data support the proposition that the beneficial effect of CTLA4Ig on transplant arteriosclerosis arises via a direct inhibitory effect on T cell activation rather than through inhibition of other cellular processes underlying lesion formation.
In summary, this is the first demonstration that late blockade of T cell costimulation can interrupt the development of arteriosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis in a model of chronic cardiac allograft rejection. Furthermore, these data support a crucial role for continued T cell activation in chronic rejection and provides additional evidence for a differential function of CD80 and CD86 in induction of alloimmune responses.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by research grants R01 A134963, A140629, and A140152 from the National Institutes of Health.
K. S. K. and M. D. D. contributed equally to this work.
Accepted for publication November 3, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Kosuge, J.-i. Suzuki, G. Haraguchi, N. Koga, Y. Maejima, M. Inobe, M. Isobe, and T. Uede Critical Role of Inducible Costimulator Signaling in the Development of Arteriosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 26(12): 2660 - 2665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Isobe, H. Kosuge, and J.-i. Suzuki T Cell Costimulation in the Development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Potential Targets for Therapeutic Interventions Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1447 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kronfeld, E. Hochleitner, S. Mendler, J. Goldschmidt, R. Lichtenfels, F. Lottspeich, H. Abken, and B. Seliger B7/CD28 Costimulation of T Cells Induces a Distinct Proteome Pattern Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1876 - 1887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ardjomand, J. C. McAlister, N. J. Rogers, P. H. Tan, A. J. T. George, and D. F. P. Larkin Modulation of Costimulation by CD28 and CD154 Alters the Kinetics and Cellular Characteristics of Corneal Allograft Rejection Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 3899 - 3905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Shirasugi, A. B. Adams, M. M. Durham, A. E. Lukacher, H. Xu, P. Rees, S. R. Cowan, M. A. Williams, T. C. Pearson, and C. P. Larsen Prevention of Chronic Rejection in Murine Cardiac Allografts: A Comparison of Chimerism- and Nonchimerism-Inducing Costimulation Blockade-Based Tolerance Induction Regimens J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2677 - 2684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. TIKKANEN, K. B. LEMSTROM, and P. K. KOSKINEN Blockade of CD28/B7-2 Costimulation Inhibits Experimental Obliterative Bronchiolitis in Rat Tracheal Allografts . Suppression of Helper T Cell Type1-dominated Immune Response Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 724 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yamada, A. D. Salama, and M. H. Sayegh The Role of Novel T Cell Costimulatory Pathways in Autoimmunity and Transplantation J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2002; 13(2): 559 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |