| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |





From the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,*
Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany;
the Department of Gastroenterology and
Hepatology,
Friedrich-Alexander-University
Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany; and the Gerhard-Domagk-Institute
of Pathology,
University of Muenster,
Muenster, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1(I),
fibronectin, and the fibronectin receptor, integrin
5ß1. Unlike
TGF-ß1, however, CTGF does not stimulate anchorage-independent growth
of NRK fibroblasts or inhibit growth of mink lung epithelial cells,
indicating that CTGF does not share all biological activities with
TGF-ß1.2,6
In this line CTGF seems to be a downstream
mediator for only some actions of TGF-ß1, notably promotion of
fibroblast proliferation and extracellular matrix
production.7,8
Co-injection of CTGF in subcutaneous tissue
of mice enhances and perpetuates the fibrotic response after injection
of TGF-ß1.9
Because of its potentiating effect in organ
fibrosis and because of its specific expression by and action on
mesenchymal cells, CTGF is considered an attractive target for
antifibrotic therapies. Several studies demonstrated that CTGF mRNA is coordinately expressed with TGF-ß1 in fibrogenic lesions such as atherosclerosis,10 scleroderma,11-14 and fibrosis of kidneys,15 lungs,16 and intestine.17 Recently, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) were identified as major cellular source of CTGF in liver fibrogenesis,18 in which TGF-ß1 is a prominent profibrogenic cytokine.19 However, CTGF transcripts in activated HSC were only shown for a single case of (human) liver cirrhosis. By studying the temporospatial expression of CTGF in rats with acute and chronic hepatic fibrogenesis, we identified bile duct epithelia as a dominant source of CTGF mRNA in liver subsequent to bile duct occlusion (BDO).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Total liver RNA was reverse transcribed with an oligo-dT primer and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany) according to the manufacturers instructions. Rat CTGF cDNA was amplified with primers CAA CCG CAA GAT TGG AGT GT and CTC CAG TCT GCA GAA GGT ATT G according to positions 398 to 417 and 806 to 827 of the mouse CTGF sequence (fisp-12, GenBank accession number: M70642).7,20 Polymerase chain reaction products were cloned into the EcoRV site of pZErO-1 and sequenced on both strands. The rat sequence of the CTGF amplicon has been submitted to GenBank/EMBL (accession number AJ236872). The rat protein displays 95% homology to mouse, human, and porcine CTGF.
Animal Models
Animal experiments were performed in accordance with local
institutional and governmental regulations on the use of experimental
animals. Wistar rats were maintained in 12-hour light/dark cycles at
23°C with a humidity of 60 ± 10%. Fifteen male rats (
125 g;
Animal Production Facilities, Schoenwalde, Germany) received a
single intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 (1.25
ml/kg body weight), mixed with an equal volume of vegetable oil. Groups
of three animals were sacrificed 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the
injection, and three untreated rats served as controls. In eight female
rats (
250 g) the common bile duct was injected in a
retrograde manner with the sclerosant sodium amidotriazoate (0.2 ml/kg
body weight, Ethibloc; Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany) as reported
previously.21,22
Another eight rats, in whom the abdominal
cavity was opened and resealed, were used as sham-operation controls.
After 6 weeks, rats were sacrificed and aliquots of right and left
liver lobes were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
In Situ Hybridization Combined with Immunohistochemistry
Plasmids containing rat CTGF (430 bp, see above), TGF-ß1 (a
570-bp fragment from position 987 to 1550 in X52498), kindly provided
by Dr. X. L. Tian, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine,
Berlin, Germany)23
and rat procollagen
1(I) (a 1.3-kb
PstI/HindIII-fragment of plasmid
1R1, provided
by Dr. D. Rowe, Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut
Health Center, Farmington, CT, subcloned in pGEM (Promega, Mannheim,
Germany)24
were linearized prior to transcription.
Antisense and sense (negative control) RNA probes were prepared by
in vitro transcription with
[35S]-UTP (NEN, Cologne, Germany) and used for
in situ hybridization combined with
immunohistochemistry on a single section as described
before.25-27
Briefly, 5-µm frozen sections were mounted
onto 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane-coated slides and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 minutes,
followed by washes in PBS, dehydration in graded ethanol, and
air-drying. After prehybridization, slides were hybridized with
antisense or sense probes at 52°C for 16 hours, followed by high
stringency washing, and RNase A digestion to remove unhybridized RNA.
For double labeling, sections were stained with monoclonal antibodies
to desmin (DAKO, Hamburg, Germany) by the alkaline phosphatase
anti-phosphatase (APAAP) method before prehybridization under
RNase-free conditions. Sections were dehydrated and dipped into photo
emulsion (Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany), followed by
autoradiographical exposure at 4°C for 1 to 2 weeks, development,
fixation, and counterstaining with hematoxylin and eosin.
RNA Isolation and Multiprobe Ribonuclease Protection Assay
RNA was extracted from snap-frozen liver tissues by the single-step method of Chomczynski and Sacchi.28 Concentration and purity of RNA were determined by spectrophotometry at 260/280 nm and integrity of RNA was verified by visualization of the 18S and 28S rRNA bands after agarose (1.4%) electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining.
[
-32P]-UTP (NEN)-labeled antisense
riboprobes for rat CTGF (the full length of our cloned sequence),
glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)29
and
TGF-ß1 were prepared by in vitro transcription and
purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The ribonuclease
protection assay (RPA) was performed as described22
using
the RPA II kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturers
instructions. In brief, 20 µg of total RNA and 30,000 cpm of each
probe (20,000 cpm for the GAPDH mRNA) were hybridized in 20 µl of
hybridization buffer containing 80% formamide at 45°C for 16 hours
and digested with RNase T1 at 37°C for 1 hour. Protected
probes were separated on a 5% polyacrylamide/8 mol/L urea gel followed
by autoradiography with X-ray films (Kodak, Rochester, NY) at -70°C
for 16 hours. Sizes of the protected sequences for CTGF, TGF-ß1, and
GAPDH were 430, 253, and 102 nucleotides, respectively.
Signal Quantification and Statistical Analysis
Autoradiographies were analyzed with the public domain program NIH Image (developed at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) on a Power Macintosh 7500/100 computer. Target mRNA signals of CTGF and TGF-ß1 were normalized to the GAPDH signal and expressed as relative abundance (arbitrary units). The differences among the various time points after injection of CCl4 were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. The differences between sham-operated and BDO rats were compared by the unpaired t-test. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using primers derived from the mouse CTGF mRNA sequence, we amplified a 430-bp fragment from rat liver cDNA. After excluding the 42-bp mouse primer regions, this rat sequence shared 95 and 97% identity with mouse CTGF at the mRNA and the deduced amino acid level, respectively. Amino acid identity was also 95% with human and pig, and 82% with bovine and frog CTGF.
CTGF mRNA Levels in Rats with Acute and Chronic Liver Fibrogenesis
CTGF mRNA levels in normal rat livers were low. After a single
injection of CCl4, mRNAs for TGF-ß1 and CTGF
rose slowly, but only increased significantly (
50% greater than
baseline) 72 hours after injection (Figure 1)
. However, at 72 hours one out of three
rats showed a low CTGF and a high TGF-ß1 mRNA steady state level,
indicating that at later time points expression of these two cytokines
may dissociate (Figure 1A)
. Furthermore, this finding underlines the
well-known individual heterogeneity of the CCL4
model of fibrogenesis. In contrast, normalized mRNA levels of TGF-ß1
and CTGF in livers of rats with secondary biliary cirrhosis (BDO) were
fourfold and sevenfold higher than those of the sham-operated controls
(P < 0.001, Figure 2
).
|
|
By combining in situ hybridization with immunostaining
for cell-specific markers CTGF mRNA was barely detectable in liver
sections of normal rats, except for a local up-regulation in portal and
central vein endothelia and in myocytes of portal arteries (Figure 3, A and B)
. After acute
CCl4 intoxication signals for CTGF mRNA were
increased predominantly in activated HSCs/myofibroblasts, identified by
positivity for desmin (Figure 3C)
. Surprisingly, CTGF mRNA was highly
up-regulated and almost exclusively found over proliferating,
pan-cytokeratin-positive and desmin-negative bile duct epithelia in
rats after 6 weeks of BDO (Figure 3
; D, E, F, and G). Here, signal
intensity varied among cells of a single bile duct. These
CTGF-expressing cells were surrounded by a rim of procollagen
1(I)
expressing, desmin-positive HSCs/myofibroblasts (Figure 3H)
.
|
Although in acute fibrogenesis the time course and quantitative
expression of TGF-ß1 and CTGF mRNA were virtually superimposable
(Figure 1)
, in BDO-induced fibrosis proliferating bile duct epithelia
expressed TGF-ß1 mRNA at minimal levels whereas it was highly
up-regulated in the surrounding HSCs/myofibroblasts (data not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By combining in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry we identified activated HSCs as the main cellular source of CTGF in later time points of acute fibrogenesis triggered by CCl4, confirming a recent report.18 In normal as well as CCl4-injured livers, however, CTGF transcripts were most prominent over venous endothelial cells and arterial myocytes. This is consistent with the results obtained in rats and other species, where CTGF transcripts were predominantly found in fibroblasts and endothelia of the skin,13 gingiva,30 kidney,15 pancreas,31 and lung,16 as well as in smooth muscle cells of atherosclerotic blood vessels10 and in hypertrophic chondrocytes of costal cartilage.32 The basal expression of CTGF in these cell types was low, but highly up-regulated during wound healing or fibrogenesis. A single in vivo study showed some CTGF expression by renal tubular epithelial cells.33 Our observation of a prominent expression of CTGF by proliferating bile duct epithelial cells in vivo is unexpected. However, it explains the prominent fibroductular reaction around proliferating bile duct epithelia in biliary fibrosis, as exemplified by an up-regulated procollagen I expression by periductular myofibroblast-like cells.34 It is also in line with the TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß2 mRNA expression patterns of these ductular epithelial cells and periductular myofibroblasts that we found in an earlier study.35 Furthermore, the deposition of CTGF immune-reactive material in the periductular extracellular matrix observed by Paradis and colleagues18 mostly likely reflects the affinity of this growth factor to abundant matrix proteins such as collagens and fibronectin.36
The observed patchy distribution of CTGF mRNA in proliferating bile duct cells does not seem to be related to proliferation, because we showed previously that the proliferation marker Ki-67 is distributed homogeneously in larger as well as proliferating biliary epithelia.34,35
Our findings may have therapeutic implications. TGF-ß1 has been regarded as a key profibrogenic cytokine that is capable of promoting mesenchymal proliferation and extracellular matrix production and of suppressing extracellular matrix degradation.37 Thus blocking the expression or activity of TGF-ß1 can effectively prevent organ fibrosis in various experimental models.38 However, TGF-ß1 is a pleiotropic, multifunctional, and context-dependent cytokine, including a strong immunosuppressive and proapoptotic effect for lymphocytes, macrophages, and hepatocytes.39 TGF-ß1 knockout mice die shortly after birth of an excessive inflammatory response, because of massive mononuclear infiltration into organs such as intestine and liver. Furthermore, depending on the context the role of TGF-ß1 in carcinogenesis can be divergent, varying from inhibition to promotion of tumor formation or metastasis.40 Therefore, complete blockade of its expression or activity is accompanied by unfavorable if not lethal side effects.
On the other hand, the effect of CTGF, which acts in conjunction with TGF-ß1, seems to be limited to the mesenchymal compartment.2 Therefore, inhibition of CTGF bioactivity is expected to be a better target for antifibrotic therapies.41 However, as we showed in our study, activated epithelial cells have to be considered as a major source of CTGF in vivo.
In conclusion, we found that in rat biliary fibrosis bile-duct epithelial cells are the dominant cellular source of CTGF and that the expression of CTGF mRNA is coordinately up-regulated with that of TGF-ß1, supporting the suggested role of CTGF as an associated if not downstream mediator of TGF-ß actions.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by a grant from the Federal Ministry of Science and Research (BMBF-IZKF, University Erlangen-Nuernberg).
N.S. and J.-D.J. contributed equally to this report.
Accepted for publication January 8, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Black Jr. and P. C. Trackman Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 (TGF{beta}1) Stimulates Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CCN2/CTGF) Expression in Human Gingival Fibroblasts through a RhoA-independent, Rac1/Cdc42-dependent Mechanism: STATINS WITH FORSKOLIN BLOCK TGF{beta}1-INDUCED CCN2/CTGF EXPRESSION J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10835 - 10847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, K. Harada, S. Ozaki, S. Furubo, K. Kizawa, T. Sanzen, M. Yasoshima, H. Ikeda, M. Sasaki, and Y. Nakanuma Cholangiocytes with Mesenchymal Features Contribute to Progressive Hepatic Fibrosis of the Polycystic Kidney Rat Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 171(6): 1859 - 1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Black Jr., A. H. Palamakumbura, M. Stan, and P. C. Trackman Tissue-specific Mechanisms for CCN2/CTGF Persistence in Fibrotic Gingiva: INTERACTIONS BETWEEN cAMP AND MAPK SIGNALING PATHWAYS, AND PROSTAGLANDIN E2-EP3 RECEPTOR MEDIATED ACTIVATION OF THE c-JUN N-TERMINAL KINASE J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15416 - 15429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, K. Harada, S. Furubo, K. Kizawa, T. Sanzen, M. Yasoshima, S. Ozaki, K. Isse, M. Sasaki, and Y. Nakanuma Inhibition of Intrahepatic Bile Duct Dilation of the Polycystic Kidney Rat with a Novel Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Gefitinib Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2006; 169(4): 1238 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Biecker, A. De Gottardi, M. Neef, M. Unternahrer, V. Schneider, M. Ledermann, H. Sagesser, S. Shaw, and J. Reichen Long-Term Treatment of Bile Duct-Ligated Rats with Rapamycin (Sirolimus) Significantly Attenuates Liver Fibrosis: Analysis of the Underlying Mechanisms J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 952 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, K. Harada, K. Kizawa, T. Sanzen, S. Furubo, M. Yasoshima, S. Ozaki, M. Ishibashi, and Y. Nakanuma Activation of the MEK5/ERK5 Cascade Is Responsible for Biliary Dysgenesis in a Rat Model of Caroli's Disease Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2005; 166(1): 49 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chaqour, C. Whitbeck, J.-S. Han, E. Macarak, P. Horan, P. Chichester, and R. Levin Cyr61 and CTGF are molecular markers of bladder wall remodeling after outlet obstruction Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2002; 283(4): E765 - E774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Saile, N. Matthes, K. Neubauer, C. Eisenbach, H. El-Armouche, J. Dudas, and G. Ramadori Rat liver myofibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells differ in CD95-mediated apoptosis and response to TNF-alpha Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): G435 - G444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |