| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |


From the Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive
Care,*
the Department of Surgery,
Campus Virchow-Klinikum, and the Franz Volhard
Klinik,
Campus Berlin-Buch, Medical Faculty
Charité, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.
Stimulated IL-8 production reached a plateau within 48 hours while
MCP-1 continued to accumulate throughout 96 hours. Induction of IL-8
and MCP-1 synthesis by HPFBs was also triggered by peritoneal
macrophage-conditioned medium. This effect was partly related to the
presence of IL-1ß as demonstrated by IL-1 receptor antagonist
inhibition. Pretreatment of HPFBs with actinomycin D or puromycin
dose-dependently reduced cytokine-stimulated IL-8 and MCP-1
secretion, which suggested de novo chemokine
synthesis. Indeed, exposure of HPFBs to IL-1ß and tumor
necrosis factor-
produced a significant up-regulation of IL-8 and
MCP-1 mRNA. This effect was associated with the rapid induction of
nuclear factor-
B binding activity mediated through p65
and p50 subunits, and with a transient increase in the mRNA
expression for RelB and inhibitory protein
B-
proteins. These
data indicate that peritoneal fibroblasts are capable of generating
large quantities of chemokines under a tight control of nuclear
factor-
B/Rel transcription factors. Thus, peritoneal
fibroblast-derived chemokines may contribute to the intraperitoneal
recruitment of leukocytes during peritonitis.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
] act as potent
chemoattractants for neutrophils whereas members of the C-C chemokine
subfamily [eg, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and RANTES]
mediate the chemotaxis of mainly mononuclear cells.2-6
Accordingly, analyses of peritoneal effluent obtained during
peritonitis from patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis have revealed
that numbers and types of infiltrating leukocytes correlated with
levels of specific chemokines.7-9
Increased
intraperitoneal levels of chemokines have also been documented in
animal models of septic peritonitis.10
Previous studies
have provided ample evidence that the peritoneal mesothelium
constitutes a major source of chemotactic activity in the inflamed
peritoneum.11-14
It has been demonstrated that by
secreting chemokines in a polarized manner mesothelial cells promote
directed transmesothelial migration of both neutrophils and
monocytes.15-17
On the other hand, our knowledge of how
other peritoneal cell populations participate in the recruitment of
inflammatory cells into the peritoneal cavity is limited. Fibroblasts,
which are scattered in the submesothelial interstitium, have commonly
been viewed as providing little more than a structural lattice for
other cell types. The potentially important role of peritoneal
fibroblasts in the intraperitoneal inflammatory response has only
recently begun to emerge.18
After the establishment of
pure cultures of human peritoneal fibroblasts (HPFBs)
in either two-dimensional19
or
three-dimensional20
systems, it has been demonstrated that
HPFBs possess a significant biosynthetic capacity for producing
cytokines and prostaglandins and are capable of responding to mitogen
stimuli present in the milieu of peritonitis exudate.
Fibroblasts isolated from other tissues have been shown to generate a
broad array of chemokines either constitutively or on
stimulation.21-25
However, the degree to which these data
can be extrapolated to the peritoneal fibroblast is rather limited;
fibroblasts do not form a homogeneous population and marked differences
in functional phenotypes have been observed between fibroblasts from
different anatomical locations.26,27
In the present study
we have therefore examined the chemokine production by cultured HPFBs
and its regulation by peritoneal macrophage (PM
)-derived
pro-inflammatory cytokines.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All chemicals, unless otherwise stated, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Deisenhofen, Germany. All tissue culture plastics were from Falcon; Becton-Dickinson GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany. Recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) was kindly provided by Dr. P. Scholz (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany). All other recombinant materials were obtained from R&D Systems GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Isolation and Culture of HPFBs
HPFBs were isolated from the specimens of omentum obtained from consenting patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Cells were isolated and characterized as described in detail elsewhere.19 HPFBs were identified by uniform spindle-shape appearance, formation of parallel arrays and whorls at confluence, and by the uniform positive staining for vimentin. The presence of contaminating endothelial and/or mesothelial cells was excluded after negative staining for factor VIII-related antigen, cytokeratin 18, and desmin. Cells were propagated in Hams F12 culture medium (ICN Biomedicals GmbH, Meckenheim, Germany) supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mmol/L), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (all from Seromed, Biochrom KG, Berlin, Germany), insulin (0.5 µg/ml), transferrin (0.5 µg/ml), hydrocortisone (0.4 µg/ml), and 10% v/v fetal calf serum (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies GmbH, Eggenstein, Germany). HPFB cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. All experiments were performed using 1 to 3 passage cultures with cells derived from at least five separate donors.
Peritoneal Macrophage-Conditioned Medium (PM
-CM)
PM
-CM was kindly supplied by Dr. N. Topley (Institute of
Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK).
PM
were harvested from peritoneal effluent drained from
infection-free patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, as previously
described.28
Conditioned medium was collected from
adherent PM
cultures after a 3-hour incubation with Hams F12
medium containing 0.1% fetal calf serum (which was necessary to
maintain PM
baseline viability).
Induction of Chemokine Production
HPFBs were grown to confluence and then rendered quiescent by
serum-deprivation for 48 hours before stimulation. Under these
conditions the cells remained in a viable (as assessed by LDH release
and intracellular ATP levels) and nonproliferative state (as measured
by the incorporation of
[3H]-thymidine).19
Quiescent HPFB
cultures were then stimulated with recombinant IL-1ß and/or tumor
necrosis factor (TNF)-
. In separate experiments cells were exposed
to PM
-CM in the presence or absence IL-1Ra. In the inhibition
studies HPFBs were pretreated with transcription (actinomycin D) or
translation (puromycin) inhibitors for 1 or 2 hours before stimulation,
respectively. Preliminary experiments revealed that concentrations of
the inhibitors used did not affect the viability of HPFBs. At
designated time intervals the supernates were removed, centrifuged at
12,000 x g to remove any cellular debris and stored at
-70°C until assayed. The number of cells in representative HPFB
monolayers was estimated using the improved Neubauer chamber.
Chemokine Measurements
Concentrations of IL-8 and MCP-1 in HPFB-derived supernates were measured with specific sandwich-type immunoassays using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-matched antibody pairs against IL-8 (R&D Systems) or MCP-1 (PharMingen GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). The assays were designed and performed according to the manufacturers instructions. Sensitivity of the systems was 2.4 and 4.5 pg/ml for IL-8 and MCP-1, respectively. Intra- and interassay precision was <5% and <12%, respectively.
Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Total cellular RNA from HPFB cultures was extracted with the RNA Isolator (Genosys Biotechnologies Ltd., Cambridge, UK) and purified according to the manufacturers protocol. One microgram of the isolated RNA was then reverse-transcribed into cDNA with random hexamer primers, as previously described.19
PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 50 µl containing
36.25 µl H2O, 2.5 µl sense/antisense primers
(20 µmol/L), 4 µl dNTPs (2.5 mmol/L), 5 µl 10x PCR buffer with
1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.25 µl Taq
polymerase (1.25 U, AmpliTaq; Perkin Elmer), and 2 µl of reverse
transcription product. Specific oligonucleotide primer pairs were
synthesized by TIB MolBiol SyntheseLabor, Berlin, Germany (Table 1)
. Polymerase chain reaction was
performed on Perkin Elmer 480 Thermocycler (Perkin Elmer Cetus, Applied
Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany). An initial 3-minute denaturation
step was followed by 23 to 33 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 40
seconds, annealing at 55 to 60°C for 1 minute, and extension at
72°C for 1 minute. The final cycle was 94°C for 40 seconds and
60°C for 10 minutes. Preliminary experiments determined the number of
cycles so that PCR products were generated during the exponential phase
of amplification. PCR products were then separated by electrophoresis
on ethidium bromide-stained 3% agarose gels (FMC Bioproducts; Biozym
Diagnostic GmbH, Hess Oldendorf Germany) and visualized under UV
illumination. Expression of target mRNAs was assessed by comparison
with the expression of the housekeeping gene of ß-actin in the same
sample. The bands corresponding to the intended products were analyzed
using Scanpack 14.1A27 software (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany).
|
For electrophoretic mobility shift assay cells were harvested at
different time points after stimulation with IL-1ß (1,000 pg/ml) and
then lysed in whole-cell lysate buffer, containing 20 mmol/L Hepes (pH
7.9), 350 mmol/L NaCl, 20% glycerol, 1 mmol/L
MgCl2, 0,5 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid, 0,1 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, and a mixture of protease
inhibitors.34,35
Labeling and binding reactions
were performed essentially as described previously.36
The
DNA probe containing the
B site from the major histocompatibility
complex-enhancer (H2K) was end-labeled with
32P-dATP. Protein fractions and the probe were incubated
for 30 minutes at 30°C in 20 µl of reaction buffer containing 2
µg poly (dI-dC), 1 µg bovine serum albumin, 1 mmol/L
dithiothreitol, 20 mmol/L Hepes (pH 8.4), 60 mmol/L KCl, and 8%
Ficoll. In antibody supershift experiments 1 µl of the antisera
against relevant nuclear factor (NF)-
B proteins (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) were added. The DNA-protein
complexes were analyzed on 5% polyacrylamide/Tris
borate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid gels. All electrophoretic
mobility shift assay experiments were performed in triplicates.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests for paired data (GraphPad Prism 3.00; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Repeated measures analysis of variance with Friedman modification or Wilcoxon signed rank test were used when appropriate. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant. All data are presented as mean (±SEM).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All HPFB cultures examined (n = 26) released MCP-1 and IL-8 spontaneously. After a 48-hour incubation under serum-free conditions and in the absence of any additional stimulation the levels of these chemokines ranged from 18 to 620 pg/104 cells (median value, 118) for MCP-1 and from 10 to 170 pg/104 cells (median value, 55) for IL-8. There was a significant correlation between the concentrations of MCP-1 and IL-8 released (Spearmans r = 0.846, P < 0.001).
Induction of MCP-1 and IL-8 Production in HPFB by Recombinant Cytokines
Stimulation of HPFBs with either IL-1ß or TNF-
resulted in a
time-dependent generation of IL-8 and MCP-1 (Figure 1)
. The release of IL-8 in response to
IL-1ß (1,000 pg/ml) was significantly greater than background levels
after 6 hours of incubation and reached plateau within 48 hours. The
IL-1ß-induced MCP-1 release also became significantly elevated by 6
hours, however, the accumulation of MCP-1 continued to rise throughout
the whole time course studied. Analysis of the chemokine secretion rate
(calculated by dividing the net chemokine release during each
experimental period by the number of hours of the respective time
interval) revealed that the most pronounced IL-1ß-driven IL-8 release
occurred within the first 12 to 24 hours and then declined toward basal
values. In contrast, the MCP-1 secretion rate remained elevated
throughout the whole period of 96 hours. The time course of IL-8 and
MCP-1 generation in response to TNF-
(1,000 pg/ml) followed a
similar pattern (Figure 1)
.
|
at 100
pg/ml and above. Interestingly, although the absolute concentrations of
MCP-1 released in response to all doses of IL-1ß or TNF-
tested
were higher that those of IL-8, the fold increase above control levels
was more prominent for IL-8 than for MCP-1 (eg, IL-1ß at 10 ng/ml
triggered a 41 ± 6-fold increase in IL-8 release compared to
13 ± t2-fold increase in MCP-1 secretion).
Exposure of HPFB to a combination of IL-1ß together with TNF-
resulted in an additive release of IL-8 and MCP-1. This additive effect
was evident for IL-1ß and TNF-
combined at the range of either low
(1 to 25 pg/ml; data not shown) or higher doses (100 to 1,000 pg/ml;
Figure 2
).
|
-Conditioned Medium
After a 3-hour incubation the mean concentrations of IL-8 and
MCP-1 in undiluted conditioned medium pooled from PM
preparations
(n = 6) were 913 and 41 pg/ml, respectively.
When HPFBs were incubated in the presence of PM
-CM these values were
subtracted from those detected in HPFB supernates to estimate the
specific release of chemokines by HPFB. The concentration of IL-1ß in
PM
-CM was 448 pg/ml, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (R&D Systems).
Exposure of HPFB to PM
-CM resulted in time- and dose-dependent
stimulation of both IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion. At the optimal dilution
(1:4), PM
-CM triggered the release of HPFB-derived IL-8 and MCP-1
that was, respectively, 50 ± 12 and 24 ± 4-fold greater
than control levels within 24 hours (n = 6,
P < 0.05 for both). Incubation of HPFBs with PM
-CM
in the presence of IL-1ra (100 ng/ml) significantly reduced the
capacity of PM
-CM to stimulate both IL-8 and MCP-1 release (Figure 3)
. The HPFB secretion of IL-8 was
diminished by 31 ± 19% and of MCP-1 by 39 ± 12%
(n = 6, P < 0.05 for both).
|
Pre-exposure of HPFBs to actinomycin D for 60 minutes at 37°C
resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of cytokine-driven but not of
constitutive IL-8 and MCP-1 release (Figure 4)
. Maximal inhibition was obtained with
a dose of 10 µg/ml when IL-1ß-stimulated generation of IL-8 was
reduced from 725 ± 209 to 225 ± 88
pg/104
and MCP-1 levels were reduced from
5629 ± 1450 to 671 ± 191 pg/104
(n = 6, P < 0.001 for both).
Inhibition of TNF-
-stimulated chemokine synthesis was of a
comparable magnitude (data not shown).
|
PCR Analysis of Chemokine Gene Expression in HPFB
HPFBs constitutively expressed low basal levels of mRNA
transcripts for IL-8 and MCP-1. Exposure of HPFB to IL-1ß or TNF-
(both at 1,000 pg/ml) resulted in a transient increase in the
expression of both chemokines as assessed by comparison with the
expression of the housekeeping gene ß-actin. IL-8 mRNA was rapidly
up-regulated (within 1 hour), and maximal increase in MCP-1 mRNA
expression was observed 3 hours after the stimulation (Figure 5)
. The effect triggered by IL-1ß and
TNF-
also seemed to be dose-related; after 2 hours increased
expression of chemokine mRNA transcripts was recorded in response to
IL-1ß or TNF-
at concentrations as low as 1 pg/ml (data not
shown).
|
B in HPFB
Gel retardation assay revealed that stimulation of HPFBs with
IL-1ß (1,000 pg/ml) resulted in a rapid increase in binding of cell
extract proteins to the specific NF-
B-binding site (Figure 6)
. Enhanced DNA-binding activity was
clearly observed within 5 minutes, reached maximum after 45 minutes,
and after 90 minutes was already reduced. Specificity of
NF-
B-binding was confirmed by competitive inhibition by unlabeled
oligonucleotides (Figure 6)
. The nature of proteins responsible for the
NF-
B-activity was further characterized by supershift assays. These
experiments demonstrated that the addition of antibodies to p65/RelA
and p50, but not to RelB, had the effect of hampering the migration of
DNA-protein complexes, resulting in a clear supershift (Figure 6)
.
|
B
mRNA Expression in HPFB
Stimulation of HPFBs with IL-1ß led to substantial but transient
increases in the mRNA expression for I
B
(Figure 7A)
and RelB (Figure 7B)
. Elevated mRNA
levels were recorded within 1 hour, peaked at 3 hours, and then
returned to basal levels within 12 hours.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and the peritoneal mesothelium in
maintaining intraperitoneal microenvironment and controlling peritoneal
host defense.37-39
In contrast, peritoneal fibroblasts
received little attention as a cell population primarily involved in
the inflammatory response and as such were strikingly absent from
recent reviews on pathobiology of peritonitis and peritoneal immune
system.40,41
However, increasing experimental evidence
suggests that in many tissues the function of interstitial fibroblasts
may be of paramount importance for initiating and regulating
infiltration of immune cells during inflammatory
reactions.42
Our data indicate that also in the peritoneum
fibroblasts may provide signals for the intraperitoneal recruitment of
inflammatory bone marrow-derived cells.
Initiation of peritonitis has been associated with increased levels of
the potent proinflammatory mediators IL-1ß and TNF-
in the
peritoneum.43-45
Stimulation of quiescent HPFBs with
these cytokines led to a significant time- and dose-dependent increase
in IL-8 secretion. Comparison of the amount of IL-8 (on the pg/µg
cell protein basis) produced under similar in vitro
conditions by peritoneal fibroblasts and peritoneal mesothelial
cells13
indicated that HPFB was at least as potent in IL-8
generation as a mesothelial cell. This release of IL-8 from HPFB could
be inhibited in a dose-dependent manner after the pretreatment of HPFBs
with both transcription and translation inhibitors that suggested that
at least part of IL-8 secreted was the product of de novo
protein synthesis. PCR amplification of reverse-transcribed total HPFB
RNA with specific IL-8 primers confirmed that exposure to IL-1ß and
TNF-
resulted in a rapid and transient up-regulation of IL-8 mRNA.
Secretion of IL-8 by HPFBs could be further augmented by simultaneous
addition of IL-1ß together with TNF-
. The rise in IL-8 secretion
recorded under these conditions approximated the sum of releases
triggered by the two cytokines alone. Interestingly, Topley and
colleagues13
have demonstrated that in peritoneal
mesothelial cells stimulated with a combination of IL-1ß and TNF-
the release of IL-8 was significantly greater than the predicted
additive value. This observation may suggest that in HPFB the
mechanisms modulating signal transduction from IL-1ß and TNF-
receptors are different from those operating in mesothelial cells.
Cytokine stimulation of HPFBs was also capable of inducing significant
MCP-1 expression and release. The amount of MCP-1 secreted by HPFBs in
response to IL-1ß and TNF-
was comparable to that recorded in
mesothelial cells.11
Similarly to the induction of IL-8
this effect was inhibited by actinomycin D and puromycin and seemed to
be additive when IL-1ß and TNF-
were applied in combination. The
rate of MCP-1 secretion was, however, different such that MCP-1 release
continued to increase throughout the whole time course of a 96-hour
period studied. In contrast, induction of IL-8 was more transient with
IL-8 levels reaching plateau within 48 hours. Likewise, in HPFB treated
with IL-1ß the MCP-1/IL-8 concentration ratio rose from 1.6:1 after
12 hours to 4.2:1 after 96 hours. Thus, at the onset of peritonitis
HPFBs may provide relatively more signals triggering the
intraperitoneal influx of neutrophils while subsequently the secretion
of HPFB-derived chemokines gradually shifts toward mononuclear cell
chemoattractants. This finding is in line with observations on the
dynamics of leukocyte subpopulations infiltrating the peritoneum during
peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis1,46,47
where
IL-8 and MCP-1 were identified as being the major chemokines
responsible for the influx of neutrophils and monocytes,
respectively.7-9
Furthermore, Lu and
colleagues48
have demonstrated that on appropriate
stimulation MCP-1-deficient animals were not able to recruit monocytes
and macrophages to the peritoneum.
Increasing evidence suggests that the course and outcome of the
inflammatory response may primarily depend on the interaction between
infiltrating immune cells and structural cells such as
fibroblasts.49
We found that peritoneal fibroblasts
responded to macrophage-derived stimuli by increasing chemokine
production. It has previously been demonstrated that the potential of
PM
-CM to trigger cytokine and prostaglandin synthesis in mesothelial
cells was partly related to the presence of IL-1ß.14,50
Indeed, we found that PM
-driven HPFB chemokine production could be
reduced by the simultaneous administration of IL-1Ra. Moreover, recent
data indicate that in interactions between these two cell populations
fibroblasts play a more active role than previously imagined.
Steinhauser and colleagues51
have recently shown that the
generation of MIP-1
chemokine by macrophages depended critically on
the direct contact with fibroblasts maintained in the co-culture
system. These observations suggest the possibility that activation of
PM
in the peritoneal interstitium and interaction with HPFB may
serve to amplify the chemotactic gradient during acute phase of
peritonitis.
The transcriptional control of MCP-1 and IL-8 genes is believed to be
mediated via NF-
B/Rel proteins.52-54
These proteins
form homo- or heterodimer complexes that bind DNA in a
sequence-specific manner. The identified NF-
B subunits include
p65/RelA, p50, p52, RelB, and c-Rel.55,56
We found that
stimulation of HPFB with IL-1ß rapidly activated a NF-
B complex,
which in supershift experiments could be further defined as being
composed of p65 and p50 subunits. This is a classical association of
NF-
B proteins that seems to be particularly important in regulating
the expression of genes during the inflammatory
response.55
In the absence of stimulation the NF-
B
(p50/p65) is sequestered in the cytoplasm through binding to the
inhibitory protein
B-
(I
B
) that masks a nuclear
localization signal in the NF-
B sequence. Stimulation with
pro-inflammatory mediators leads to a multistep I
B
degradation
that allows nuclear translocation of NF-
and its binding to target
DNA motifs. These include the promoter of I
B
and as a result
I
B
is rapidly resynthesized creating a feedback loop limiting
prolonged activation of NF-
B.55-57
Indeed, we observed
the inducible expression of I
B
mRNA in HPFB in response to
IL-1ß that activated NF-
B. Furthermore, the up-regulation of
I
B
mRNA correlated with a decrease in NF-
B binding activity.
However, the I
B
pathway is probably not the only mechanism
controlling NF-
B activity and it does not seem to operate in all
cell types.55,58
Recent data from Xia and
colleagues23
indicate that generation of chemokines in
fibroblasts, but not in macrophages, may be specifically regulated by
the RelB transcription factor that seems to suppress NF-
B activity.
Activation of normal fibroblast with LPS led to a transient increase in
chemokine production and parallel induction of RelB expression.
RelB-/- fibroblasts displayed spectacular
overproduction of chemokines (including murine equivalents of MCP-1 and
IL-8) and in vivo RelB-deficient animals suffered from
multifocal inflammation with massive interstitial infiltration by
neutrophils and mononuclear cells.23
We found that in
peritoneal fibroblasts the expression of RelB rapidly increased after
the stimulation with IL-1ß, however, the RelB-containing complexes
did not seem to contribute to NF-
B activity as demonstrated by
supershift assays. A similar effect was also observed in murine kidney
fibroblasts. Xia and colleagues23
demonstrated that,
although RelB was translocated to the nucleus after the stimulation, it
did not directly participate in the NF-
B binding. These observations
indicate that in fibroblasts RelB could execute its inhibitory
potential through a new, not yet identified, mechanism.
Under normal conditions the peritoneal cavity contains a small volume
of serous fluid and a low number of resident leukocytes with
macrophages forming
90% of the population.59
A
significant proportion of macrophages has also been located in the
submesothelial interstitium.60
As peritoneal fibroblasts
constitutively generated considerable amounts of MCP-1, one may
hypothesize that the establishment of these resident macrophages in the
peritoneum is mediated, at least partially, by peritoneal
fibroblast-derived MCP-1. In this respect Koyama and
colleagues22
have demonstrated that human pulmonary
fibroblasts constitutively secrete MCP-1 at concentrations high enough
to facilitate monocyte influx into the lung. On the other hand,
although MCP-1 seems to be critical for intraperitoneal monocyte
trafficking during the inflammatory response, it has been suggested
that the presence of resident macrophages in the peritoneum is
independent of MCP-1.48
The yield of PM
from
unchallenged MCP-1-deficient mice did not differ from that in wild-type
animals. However, even if MCP-1 is not responsible for basal monocyte
recruitment in healthy humans, its function may still be important in
patients treated with peritoneal dialysis for kidney insufficiency. The
procedure produces constant loss of macrophages with the drained
dialysate and is associated with a small but continuous migration of
new mononuclear cell populations into the peritoneum.1
As
fibroblasts are uniquely positioned in the peritoneal interstitium
between the vascular compartment and the peritoneal cavity,
HPFB-derived MCP-1 may well be involved in monocyte recruitment under
these conditions. In this respect, the presence of MCP-1 has been
documented in peritoneal effluents from infection-free peritoneal
dialysis patients.7,52
In addition, Tekstra and
colleagues7
have shown that monocyte migration toward
these dialysates during in vitro chemotaxis assay could be
blocked with anti-MCP-1 antibodies.
Taken together our data indicate that although peritoneal fibroblasts constitute a small fraction of the peritoneal tissue mass, they may play a very special role in the recruitment of immune cells into the peritoneum. These observations also support the concept of fibroblasts as sentinel cells that combine structural and immunomodulatory function.42
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by a grant from the Else-Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, Bad Homburg, Germany (to A. J.).
Accepted for publication December 27, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-L. Shi, X.-Z. Luo, X.-Y. Zhu, K.-Q. Hua, Y. Zhu, and D.-J. Li Effects of combined 17beta-estradiol with TCDD on secretion of chemokine IL-8 and expression of its receptor CXCR1 in endometriotic focus-associated cells in co-culture Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 870 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kato, Y. Yuzawa, N. Tsuboi, S. Maruyama, Y. Morita, T. Matsuguchi, and S. Matsuo Endotoxin-Induced Chemokine Expression in Murine Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells: The Role of Toll-Like Receptor 4 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 1289 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dechend, J. Gieffers, R. Dietz, A. Joerres, J. Rupp, F. C. Luft, and M. Maass Hydroxymethylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibition Reduces Chlamydia pneumoniae-Induced Cell Interaction and Activation Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 261 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |