| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |





From the Laboratoire de Génomique Cellulaire des Cancers
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de
Recherche,*
the Laboratoire de
Cytogénétique,
the Unité
des Marqueurs Génétiques des
Cancers,
the Département
dAnatomopathologie¶
and the Département de
Pédiatrie,
Institut Gustave Roussy,
Villejuif, France; and the Department of Biological
Sciences,||
Fordham University, Bronx, New York
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The MYCN oncogene is amplified
in
30% of advanced stage tumors as well as in most cell lines,
typically derived from advanced stage tumors. As shown previously
in vitro, extrachromosomal amplified genes in acentric
double-minutes chromosomes (dmin) can be expelled from the nucleus and
lost from the cell. Loss of amplified sequences is correlated with a
loss of malignant properties and cellular
differentiation.12-16
Expelled material is seen as
micronuclei, small nuclear-like structures. Micronuclei can arise from
the nucleus by budding during S phase17
or after mitosis
as the nuclear membrane reforms. They can contain not only amplified
oncogenes but also acentric chromosome fragments or whole damaged
chromosomes.18,19
In this study we assayed 46 NB tumors for MNA, 1p, and 17q status. We found 11 tumors with MNA and in at least 8 of the 11 we observed micronuclei comprising amplified MYCN sequences. Our work is the second report of spontaneous elimination of amplified genes occurring in vivo from NB cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Forty-six samples of NB were analyzed in our institute between
November, 1998 and March, 2000. Tumor tissue obtained by fine needle
biopsy directly from the tumor and/or from metastatic bone marrow (BM)
was smeared directly on slides (imprinted slides) at the time of
diagnosis and/or placed in culture medium. Biopsy samples in culture
medium were divided into two aliquots, one for fluorescence in
situ hybridization (FISH) and the second for quantitative
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by TaqMan (PE Biosystems, Roche
Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ). Histological analysis
showed 70 to 90% tumor cells in samples NB1-8 (Table 1)
and only 6 to 11% tumor cells in
NB9-11 (data not shown).
|
Samples for FISH analysis were mechanically dissociated, washed, and cultured overnight in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum and 10 ng/ml colchicine. Interphase nuclei and metaphase spreads were prepared by standard cytogenetic procedures. Material on imprinted slides was fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1) for 15 minutes and kept at room temperature overnight.
FISH was performed with commercial probes D1Z5 (centromeric region of chromosome 1), MYCN, D2Zcen, D17Zcen, and D17qter (Quantum Appligene, Illkirch, France; Vysis, Inc., Downers Grove, IL). Probe D1Z2 (for detection of 1p36 deletion) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and labeled in our laboratory. We used one probe combination (centromere plus specific locus) per slide, which means that for each tumor we analyzed three slides (one for chromosome 1, one for chromosome 2, and one for chromosome 17). Whole chromosome-painting probes were obtained commercially (Quantum Appligene; Vysis). Conditions of hybridization have been described elsewhere.20 For each primary tumor we surveyed 500 interphase nuclei on cytogenetic preparations (NB1-6) and 200 nuclei on imprinted slides (NB6-8) to establish the percentage of MYCN-containing micronuclei/100 nuclei. For detection of 1p deletion and 17q overrepresentation, we analyzed 200 interphasic nuclei and the rare metaphase cells present (NB3-6). In BM samples, 500 nuclei were analyzed.
Quantitative PCR Analysis
The second portion of biopsy material was frozen and cut into 6- to 8-µm slices for histological evaluation of tumor cell content and for DNA extraction. Nucleic acids were extracted using a RNA/DNA kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). Quality of genomic DNA and total RNA was assessed by gel electrophoresis. Quantification of MYCN copy number was performed by real-time quantitative PCR using the ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system (PE Biosystems). PCR first cycle conditions were: denaturation at 95°C for 10 minutes and reannealing/extension at 50°C for 2 minutes followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds and at 60°C for 1 minute. The PCR reaction mixture was prepared in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer and contained 5 mmol/L MgCl2. For MYCN copy number determination we used the following primes: forward primer 5'GGCGTTCCTCCTCCAACAC, reverse primer 5'CGTTTGAAGATCAGCTCGC, and the Taqman probe FAM5' ACATTCACCATCACTGTGCGTCCCAAG 3'TAMRA. Briefly, during the real-time quantitative PCR process, 5' to 3' exonuclease activity of the Taq DNA polymerase (Gold Taq DNA pol, PE Applied Biosystems) cleaves the dual-labeled TaqMan probe annealed to a target sequence, thus releasing the reporter fluorescent dye (FAM) from the quencher dye (TAMRA). Excitation of released FAM dye by argon laser results in an increase in fluorescence that is analyzed through software (PE Applied Biosystems). Ct values (defined as the fractional cycle number at which the fluorescence generated by cleavage of the probe crosses a fixed threshold) were obtained at each cycle. A calibration curve of Ct versus the quantity of a reference DNA was generated and a gene copy number for the test sample is determined by extrapolation. Two controls with known MYCN gene copy number were used: normal healthy donor DNA with 1 copy/haploid genome and the cell line IGR-N-91 with 470 copies/haploid genome. Normalization of MYCN gene copy number for each sample is made by comparison to two internal control genes, GAPDH, and albumin.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In six MNA tumors the exact level of amplification was established by
real-time quantitative PCR. The number of copies/haploid genome ranged
from 35 to 298 (Table 1)
.
In all these cases micronuclei containing numerous MYCN
sequences were seen on either cytogenetic preparation after colcemid
treatment for 12 hours (NB1-6) or direct preparations on imprinted
slides (NB6-8) (Figure 1a)
. In NB1 the
micronuclei were detected in BM metastasis (the only tissue available),
in NB2-8 they were seen in primary tumors. The size of micronuclei was
very variable and was
5 to 30% of NB nuclei (Figure 1c)
.
|
Apparent in our study is a marked heterogeneity in degree of
amplification among cells from the same tumor (Figure 1d)
. Some nuclei
contain only a few (10 to 20) copies of the MYCN gene,
whereas others show a very high level of amplification resulting in a
uniform red staining. Also apparent are differences in the internal
organization of amplified material in nuclei. Some nuclei are
homogeneously stained, whereas in others we could easily distinguish
one or several regions of accumulation of amplified material either in
nuclei themselves (Figure 1e)
or in buds on the surface of the nucleus
(Figure 1, f and g)
.
In addition to MNA, we also evaluated our eight tumor samples for
presence of the 1p deletion (eight of eight) and the 17q
over-representation (six of eight) (Table 1)
. One of the two cases
without 17q overrepresentation contained two apparently normal copies
of chromosome 17 (NB5). The second tumor (NB4) had only one normal
chromosome 17 and a structurally rearranged chromosome der(1)t(1;17),
with simultaneous loss of genes on 17p and 1p (Figure 1h)
. Moreover, a
similar der(1)t(1;17) chromosome together with two (NB3, NB4, NB8) or
four (NB6) normal chromosomes 17 were seen in rare metaphases (Figure 1i)
.
Involved BM from patients NB2, NB3, NB7, and NB8 were also analyzed. These BM comprised only 0.3% (NB7), 0.5% (NB3), 2% (NB8), and 10% (NB2) neuroblasts unlike the BM from NB1 that comprised 90% neuroblasts. However, in matched BM we found the same genetic abnormalities as in primary tumors.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We now demonstrate that similar mechanisms may occur in the patient. In eight patients with MNA we observed the expulsion of MYCN sequences in micronuclei before therapy. Micronuclei size was variable even in the same tumor. One possible explanation is a variable DNA content. It was shown that the DNA content in radiation-induced micronuclei is influenced by several factors, eg, DNA synthesis in micronuclei or the presence of chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes.25 In the NB6 case the presence of the some or all of chromosome 2 did not influence the size of observed micronuclei. The inclusion of chromosome 2 in micronuclei with dmin suggests a hypothesis that chromosome 2 is localized in interphase nuclei to the periphery of the nucleus, because a peripheral position is a prerequisite for DNA to be expelled.17 This hypothesis is supported by the report of elevated micronucleus frequency in a healthy person associated with significant over-involvement of chromosome 2.26 The specificity of involvement of chromosome 2 sequences in NB needs to be confirmed, however, because cells were treated for 12 hours with colchicine, a classic spindle poison that can induce chromosome loss in threshold concentrations.27 The long colchicine incubation also could be a reason for the discrepancy in micronucleus frequency observed for NB6. The higher frequency of micronuclei in cytogenetic preparations could reflect the fact that colchicine can induce apoptosis. We cannot exclude the possibility, that at least some of the micronuclei containing MYCN-amplified sequences found in the colchicine-treated preparations could be apoptotic bodies.28 Conversely, the lower frequency of micronuclei found on imprinted slides might be an underestimate, because nuclei were not as well separated and many micronuclei could have been hidden between compacted nuclei.
As seen in Table 1
and commonly found for NB, the number
of amplified MYCN copies established by quantitative PCR is
very variable. In our small series of patients we did not detect any
correlation between number of micronuclei and the number of amplified
MYCN gene copies. Seven of the eight patients were older
than 1 year. All of them had MNA and clinically were stage IV NB (Table 1)
. There are several factors and mechanisms that are involved in
progression of a disease. One possible mechanism (which could be
specifically induced) is expulsion of amplified genes by tumor cells,
which has been observed to occur spontaneously. But why would a cell
expel genes that it had previously amplified? There is a clear
contradiction between gene amplification (which gives a cell a
selective advantage) and spontaneous expulsion of amplified material
(which can suppress the tumor phenotype). Spontaneous expulsion of
amplified material could be considered as a self-defense mechanism to
enable a cell to resume normal physiological functions (eg,
replication, transcription) when the nucleus contains too many
amplified sequences. There is a strict nuclear architecture and spatial
distribution of different sequences into human chromosome territories
in the nucleus29-31
that must be respected. It is
possible that, if amplification exceeds the available nuclear space,
the cell has to eliminate the excess genes by expulsion.
Treatment in vitro with drugs that enhance micronuclear formation and thus expulsion of amplified genes have been shown to reduce the tumorigenicity and revert the phenotype of malignant cells.12-16,32,33 In NB, MYCN amplification is associated with increased growth potential and tumorigenicity whereas down-regulation of MYCN expression correlates with decreased proliferation and differentiation induction.34 Moreover, MNA late-stage tumors very often are refractory to chemotherapy, at least in part because the MYCN oncogene up-regulates expression of the MRP and MDR1 multidrug resistance genes in neuroblasts.35-37 Enhancement of expulsion of amplified MYCN genes could be a way to reduce both tumorigenicity and the amplification-associated phenomenon of chemoresistance. Agents such as hydroxyurea, to which MDR1 over-expressing cells exhibit little or no cross resistance, have been shown to promote elimination of extrachromosomally amplified MYCN gene from tumor cells.32,33 Inclusion of such drugs in conventional regimens constitutes an as yet unexplored therapeutic option specifically targeting aggressive cancer cells in the 30% of tumors with MYCN oncogene amplification.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. J. L. Biedler and Dr. R. A. Ross for helpful comments and their criticism of the manuscript; and B. Léon, B. Vasseur, and Y. Final for their technical assistance.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by research grants from Ligue National Contre le Cancer, Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, and the Institute Gustave Roussy. A. Valent is a recipient of a fellowship from Ligue Contre le Cancer, Comité de lEssonne, France.
Accepted for publication February 8, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Tooker, W.-C. Yen, S.-C. Ng, A. Negro-Vilar, and T. W. Hermann Bexarotene (LGD1069, Targretin), a Selective Retinoid X Receptor Agonist, Prevents and Reverses Gemcitabine Resistance in NSCLC Cells by Modulating Gene Amplification Cancer Res., May 1, 2007; 67(9): 4425 - 4433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Moreau, P. McGrady, W. B. London, H. Shimada, S. L. Cohn, J. M. Maris, L. Diller, A. T. Look, and R. E. George Does MYCN Amplification Manifested as Homogeneously Staining Regions at Diagnosis Predict a Worse Outcome in Children with Neuroblastoma? A Children's Oncology Group Study. Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 12(19): 5693 - 5697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Santos, L. Calvet, M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe, A. Larsen, J. Benard, C. Pondarre, G. Aubert, J. Morizet, F. Lavelle, and G. Vassal In Vivo Treatment with CPT-11 Leads to Differentiation of Neuroblastoma Xenografts and Topoisomerase I Alterations Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3223 - 3229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Bown Neuroblastoma tumour genetics: clinical and biological aspects J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2001; 54(12): 897 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |