help button home button Am J Pathol Epitomics, Inc.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshizaki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshizaki, T.
(American Journal of Pathology. 2001;159:27-33.)
© 2001 American Society for Investigative Pathology


Short Communications

Induction of c-Met Proto-Oncogene by Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein-1 and the Correlation with Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Toshiyuki Horikawa*, Tzung-Shiahn Sheen{dagger}, Hajime Takeshita*, Hiroshi Sato{ddagger}, Mitsuru Furukawa* and Tomokazu Yoshizaki*

From the Department of Otolaryngology,*
School of Medicine, and the Department of Molecular Virology and Oncology,{ddagger}
Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan; and the Department of Otolaryngology,{dagger}
School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is distinctive in head and neck carcinomas for its close association with Epstein-Barr virus and its highly metastatic nature. Up-regulation of cell motility is essential for enhancement of metastatic potential. The expression of c-Met proto-oncogene, a high-affinity receptor for hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, has been reported to correlate with metastatic ability of the tumor cell. We observed close association of c-Met expression with cervical lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0272) in 39 NPC specimens studied immunohistochemically. Epstein-Barr virus-encoding latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) is a primary oncogene and is suggested to enhance the metastatic property of NPC. Previously, we reported that LMP-1 enhanced the motility of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells that was mediated by activation of Ets-1 transcription factor. Therefore, we examined the interrelationships of LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met. In immunohistochemical studies, the expression of LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met correlated significantly with each other in NPC (LMP-1 versus Ets-1, P < 0.0001; Ets-1 versus c-Met, P = 0.0012; LMP-1 versus Met, P = 0.0005). Transfection of LMP-1-expressing plasmid in MDCK cells induced c-Met protein expression. The c-Met protein was also induced by Ets-1 expression, and induction of c-Met by LMP-1 was suppressed by introducing a dominant-negative form of Ets-1 in LMP-1-expressing MDCK cells. These results suggest that LMP-1 induces c-Met through the activation of Ets-1, which may contribute in part to the highly metastatic potential of NPC.



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) frequently shows high metastasis in the early stage of disease.1 Cervical lymph node metastasis is the most frequent clinical finding of NPC that often prompts patients to seek medical advice.1 Another distinctive character of NPC in head and neck carcinomas is the consistent association of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).2 EBV is considered to be strongly associated with the oncogenesis of NPC.2 However, the mechanism of NPC metastasis is primarily unknown.

In the sequential steps of metastasis, tumor cell motility is believed to be one of the indispensable capacities, especially for the locomotion of cells.3,4 Prominent among cell motility-related molecules is the c-Met proto-oncogene product,5,6 which is the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor.7,8 c-Met has been shown to stimulate cell motility and invasion,5,6 and has been reported to be associated with the progression and/or metastasis of a variety of carcinomas.9-13 However, no study concerning c-Met in NPC has been reported to date to our knowledge.

Latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) is an EBV-encoding membrane protein, and one of four EBV gene products (LMP-1, LMP-2A, LMP-2B, and EBV nuclear antigen 1) expressed in NPC tumor cells in latent infection.14 LMP-1 is considered to be the EBV oncoprotein according to the accumulating studies, such as immortalization of human B lymphocytes15 and transformation of rodent fibroblasts16 by LMP-1. In addition to oncogenesis, LMP-1 is suggested to be relevant to the metastatic property of NPC.17-21 Type II and type III EBV related malignancies as represented on NPC, which express LMP-1, show metastatic phenotypes, whereas type I malignancies, such as Burkitt lymphoma and a subset of stomach carcinoma, which lack LMP-1 expression, are characterized by localized growth.22 Also, studies, including ours, report that LMP-1-positive NPCs show a more progressive attitude and an increased tendency toward lymph node metastasis than LMP-1-negative NPCs.18,23 Also, we have recently demonstrated that Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells with LMP-1 expression show enhanced cell motility that is mediated by Ets-1 transcription factor.17 Therefore, we focused on the contribution of c-Met to up-regulation of cell motility system and LMP-1-mediated metastasis in NPC. In this study, we examined the expressions of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 in patients with NPC by immunohistochemical analysis, and studied the associations of these proteins with clinical data. Furthermore, we investigated induction of c-Met by LMP-1 in cell line.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and Tissues

Thirty-nine tumor specimens from patients with NPC who underwent treatment at National Taiwan University Hospital in 1997 were used. After tissue samples were obtained, they were embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN), frozen immediately, and stored at -80°C.

Immunohistochemical Staining

Five-µm-thick cryostat serial sections were prepared from frozen tissues. A procedure using a standard avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex method (ABC method24 ) was performed, just as in our previous study.18 Sections were incubated with antibodies to c-Met (clone C-28, dilution 1:25; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), LMP-1 (clone CS1-4, dilution 1:25; DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark), or Ets-1 (clone C-20, dilution 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 4°C overnight. They were exposed to a universal secondary antibody (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) that contained biotinylated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig) G and peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin, followed by 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as a chromogen and hematoxylin as a nuclear counterstain. The specificity of the antibodies to c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 that we used have been previously proven.9,17,18,25 Thyroid papillary carcinoma was used as a positive control for c-Met26 and Ets-1,27 and previously identified LMP-1-positive NPC18,28 was used as a positive control for LMP-1. The specificity of the staining was also confirmed with each batch of stains by the use of serial sections with nonimmune serum instead of the primary antibody as a negative control.

Evaluation of the Specimens

The specimens were evaluated independently by two of the authors (TH and TY) without previous knowledge of the clinical data, then reviewed by the others. Two examiners each selected two representative fields that contained >200 tumor cells and counted both the immunoreactive cells and the total number of tumor cells. A total of at least 400 cells were evaluated for each staining. The percentages of immunoreactive cells showed a wide range of expressions, from 0 to 100% with one peak <10% for c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1. Based on these data, the results for c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 were classified into negative and positive categories: negative, <10% immunoreactive cells; positive, >=10% immunoreactive cells. Also, the results for c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 were classified into three scores depending on the percentage of immunoreactive cells: expression score 0, <10% immunoreactive cells; expression score 1, 10 to 50% immunoreactive cells; expression score 2, >50% immunoreactive cells, which is consistent with previously published reports.19,27,29,30 The levels of concordance, which were expressed as the percentage of agreement of the two examiners’ scores, were 92.3% (36 of 39 specimens) for c-Met and LMP-1 and 84.6% (33 of 39 specimens) for Ets-1. In the remaining specimens, the score was determined by discussion among the two examiners and the reviewers.

Plasmids and Expression Vectors

The pcDNA3 eukaryotic expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used for the LMP-1 expression constructs.17,19,20 Ets-1 expression plasmid was constructed by inserting full-length Ets-1 cDNA at the cloning site of pSG5 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).31 The cDNA sequence encoding dominant-negative form of Ets-1 (Ets-DN) was obtained by polymerase chain reaction amplification of human Ets-1 cDNA.17,31 The cDNA fragment thus obtained was inserted behind the ATG start codon introduced into pCEP4 expression vector (Invitrogen) .17,31

Cell Line and Stable Transfection

MDCK cells were obtained from Health Science Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s minimal essential medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum.17,32 MDCK cells stably expressing LMP-1 were generated by transfecting pcDNA3 plasmid containing LMP-1 open reading frame, and were selected under 600 µg/ml of G418, as described previously.17,32 MDCK cells stably expressing Ets-1 were generated by transfecting pSG5 containing Ets-1 cDNA, and selected under 600 µg/ml G418.31 In addition, MDCK cells expressing LMP-1 were transfected with pCEP4 plasmid containing Ets-DN cDNA fragment, and were then selected under 800 µg/ml of hygromycin B.17

Western Blot Analysis

c-Met protein levels in MDCK cells were analyzed by Western blotting as described previously.20,32 Ten µg of each cell lysate were solubilized to 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) by wet blotting. The membranes were incubated with an antibody to c-Met (clone C-28, dilution 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 2 hours. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (dilution 1:2000, Amersham), reactive bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham). In addition, MKN-45 cell lysate was analyzed in parallel as a positive control of c-Met.33 Expression of 63-kd LMP-1 protein in each cell was also detected with the antibody to LMP-1 (clone CS1-4, dilution 1:1000; DAKO), as previously described.32 To verify the equal protein loading, the actin level in each lane was examined with the antibody to actin (dilution 1:1000; Biomedical Technologies Inc., Stoughton, MA).

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using Macintosh personal computers (Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA) and Stat View software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA). The expressions of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 in relation to the clinicopathological data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis rank test, or chi-square test. The correlations among c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 were analyzed with chi-square test. P values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expressions of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 Correlated with Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with NPC

The expression of c-Met protein in NPC samples was immunohistochemically examined to investigate the association of c-Met protein with metastasis of NPC. The clinical staging of NPC was performed based on the International Union Against Cancer TNM classification and stage grouping (fifth edition 1997). As summarized in Table 1 , each TNM classification and stage grouping was divided into two categories, according to the method used in our previous study.18 The c-Met protein was immunolocalized on the cell membrane and cytoplasm of the tumor cells (Figure 1A) . Some endothelial cells of microvessels were also immunostained for c-Met (Figure 1B) . The thyroid carcinoma section that was used as a positive control for c-Met immunostaining showed a similar immunostaining signal to the examined NPC specimens (Figure 1C) . The section incubated with nonimmune serum instead of the primary antibody showed no staining (Figure 1D) . In 30 cases with lymph node metastasis (N1, N2, N3), the mean c-Met expression score was 1.290 ± 0.783 (the mean ± SD). In eight cases without lymph node metastasis (N0), the score was 0.500 ± 0.756. Thus, the c-Met expression score in lymph node metastasis-positive category was significantly higher than that of the lymph node metastasis-negative category (P = 0.0272) (Figure 2) . The LMP-1 protein was detected on the membrane and cytoplasm of the tumor cells (Figure 1, E and F) , which was consistent with previous reports.18,26,34 The Ets-1 protein was observed mainly at the nucleus, and also occasionally on the cytoplasm, of the tumor cells (Figure 1, G and H) .17 Infiltrating round cells in the stroma surrounding tumor nests were also occasionally immunostained for Ets-1. The thyroid carcinoma section that was used as a positive control for Ets-1 immunostaining showed a cytoplasmic immunostaining (Figure 1I) , as reported previously.27 The expression scores of LMP-1 and Ets-1 in the lymph node metastasis-positive category (1.065 ± 0.814 for LMP-1 and 0.935 ± 0.772 for Ets-1) were higher than those of the lymph node metastasis-negative category (0.500 ± 0.926 for LMP-1 and 0.375 ± 0.744 for Ets-1), although the differences were not statistically significant. By the negative-positive classification, c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 each significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, as shown in Table 2 (P = 0.0156, 0.0172, and 0.0284, respectively). These results suggest that c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 may contribute to cervical lymph node metastasis of NPC.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Association of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 Expressions with Clinicopathological Factors

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expressions of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 by immunohistochemistry in NPC. A: Immunostaining for c-Met in tumor cells of NPC. c-Met protein is observed at the membrane and cytoplasm of tumor nests. Nonkeratinizing carcinoma (World Health Organization type II). B: Immunostaining for c-Met in microvessels of NPC. c-Met protein is observed in the endothelial cells of microvessels. Nonkeratinizing carcinoma (World Health Organization type II). C: Positive control for c-Met. Cytoplasmic immunostaining for c-Met is observed in tumor cells of thyroid papillary carcinoma. D: Negative control for c-Met. The sequential section of A shows no staining, in which nonimmune serum was used instead of anti-c-Met antibody. E: Immunostaining for LMP-1 in tumor cells of NPC. Nonkeratinizing carcinoma (World Health Organization type II). F: Immunostaining for LMP-1 in NPC in a larger magnification. LMP-1 protein is detected at the membrane and cytoplasm of tumor cells. Nonkeratinizing carcinoma (World Health Organization type II). G: Immunostaining for Ets-1 in tumor cells of NPC. Nonkeratinizing carcinoma (World Health Organization type II). H: Immunostaining for Ets-1 in NPC in a larger magnification. Strong immunoreaction for Ets-1 is observed at the nucleus and cytoplasm of tumor cells in NPC. Nonkeratinizing carcinoma (World Health Organization type II). I: Positive control for Ets-1. Cytoplasmic immunostaining for Ets-1 is observed in tumor cells of thyroid papillary carcinoma. Original magnifications: x400 (A, C–E, G, and I); x600 (B); x800 (F and H).

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The mean expression scores of c-Met in 39 cases of NPC in relation to lymph node metastasis (columns, mean; bars, SD). The results of immunohistochemistry were classified into three scores as follows depending on the percentage of immunoreactive tumor cells: expression score 0, <10% immunoreactive cells; expression score 1, 10 to 50% immunoreactive cells; expression score 2, >50% immunoreactive cells. The mean expression score in lymph node metastasis-positive category (mean ± SD; 1.290 ± 0.783) was higher than that in lymph node metastasis-negative category (0.500 ± 0.756). Thus, c-Met expression significantly correlated positively with lymph node metastasis by the Mann-Whitney U test (P = 0.0272).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Correlations of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 Expressions with Lymph Node Metastasis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

 
Relationship of c-Met with LMP-1 and Ets-1 in NPC

Previously, the contribution of LMP-1 to metastasis of NPC18 and Ets-1 mediated up-regulation of MDCK cell motility by LMP-117 was reported. The relationship of c-Met with LMP-1 and Ets-1 in NPC was examined because the major role of c-Met is considered to be up-regulation of cell motility.5,6 c-Met expression was negative (score 0) in 11 cases (28.2%) and positive in 28 cases [71.8%; score 1 in 12 cases (30.8%) and score 2 in 16 cases (41.0%)] of a total of 39 cases. LMP-1 expression was negative (score 0) in 15 cases (38.5%), and positive in 24 cases (61.5%) [score 1 in 11 cases (28.2%) and score 2 in 13 cases (33.3%)]. Ets-1 expression was negative (score 0) in 16 cases (41.0%), and positive in 23 cases [59.0%; score 1 in 14 cases (35.9%) and score 2 in 9 cases (23.1%)]. As shown in Table 3 , the expressions of LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met were significantly correlated to each other by the negative-positive classification (LMP-1 versus Ets-1, P < 0.0001; Ets-1 versus c-Met, P = 0.0012; LMP-1 versus Met, P = 0.0005). By score classification, their expressions were also significantly correlated to each other (LMP-1 versus Ets-1, P = 0.0025; Ets-1 versus c-Met, P = 0.0246; LMP-1 versus Met, P = 0.0043).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Interrelationships of LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met Expressions

 
Induction of c-Met by LMP-1

The data obtained from immunohistochemistry suggested close association of c-Met with LMP-1 and Ets-1. Therefore, we investigated if LMP-1 could induce c-Met protein by Western blot analysis. As demonstrated in Figure 3 , trace amounts of c-Met protein at the molecular weights of 145 kd were detected in the parental untransfected MDCK cells and in the cells transfected with control plasmid. However, c-Met protein was clearly detected in LMP-1-transfected cells, indicating induction of c-Met protein by LMP-1. Transfection of Ets-1 expression in MDCK cells also induced c-Met protein. Previously, we reported induction of Ets-1 by LMP-1 in MDCK cells. Hence we examined whether induction of c-Met by LMP-1 is suppressed by inhibiting Ets-1 signal pathway by transfecting Ets-DN, which lacks a transactivation domain and competitively inhibits Ets-1 function, in LMP-1-expressing MDCK cells. Interestingly, co-transfection of Ets-DN in LMP-1-transfected MDCK cells suppressed induction of c-Met protein. These results suggest that induction of c-Met by LMP-1 is mediated by activation of Ets-1.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Western blot analysis displaying c-Met protein induction in MDCK epithelial cells. The lysates of MDCK cells transfected with pcDNA3, LMP-1, Ets-1, and LMP-1+ dominant-negative form of Ets-1 (EtsDN) are loaded on corresponding lanes, and examined by Western blotting with antibodies to c-Met, LMP-1, and actin as described in Materials and Methods. c-Met protein was detected as a 145-kd band. Lane MKN-45, MKN-45 cell used as a positive control; Lane (-), MDCK cell without any plasmid; Lane pcDNA3, MDCK cell transfected with control plasmid; Lane LMP-1, LMP-1-transfected MDCK cell; Lane Ets-1, Ets-1-transfected MDCK cell; Lane LMP-1+EtsDN, LMP-1-transfected cell that was co-transfected with EtsDN. These experiments were repeated several times with similar results; representative blots are shown.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Up-regulation of cell motility is considered to be an essential factor in the multiple steps of metastasis.4 Hepatocyte growth factor is a prominent growth factor that enhances cell motility.5,6 Hepatocyte growth factor is not produced by the tumor but by the stroma surrounding tumor nests.12,13 The c-Met protein is a hepatocyte growth factor receptor,7,8 which is expressed on tumor cells.9-13 Thus, c-Met expression of the tumor plays an important role for tumor cell motility, and as a consequence, influences the metastatic ability of the tumor.10 As expected, c-Met expression positively correlated with cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with NPC. Therefore, contribution of c-Met expression in the metastatic potential of NPC is suggested.

LMP-1 is of particular interest because it resembles a classical oncogene in its ability to transform rodent fibroblast cell lines.16 Expression of this viral oncogene in B-cell lines up-regulates CD23, CD40, CD54, bcl-2, and A20 genes.15,35,36 In epithelical cells, LMP-1 induces expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and A20 genes.37 In most cases, effects of LMP-1 are mediated through the activation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B and AP-1 by C-terminal activation region-1 and -2.38,39 We previously reported that LMP-1 induces matrix metalloproteinase-9,19,20 which destructs the basement membrane,40 mainly through nuclear factor-{kappa}B. Moreover, LMP-1 enhances the motility of MDCK cells through the induction of Ets-1.17 Hence, the relationship of LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met expression with each other in NPC was examined. Immunohistochemical data suggested a close association of LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met with each other in NPC specimens.

Although the number of immunohistochemically examined NPC specimens may not be conclusive, the Western blotting data clearly indicated induction of c-Met by LMP-1 in MDCK cells. Ets-1 induction by LMP-1 in MDCK cells was demonstrated previously.17 In this study, expression of c-Met is also enhanced by induction of Ets-1. Moreover, induction of c-Met by LMP-1 is inhibited by co-transfection of Ets-DN expression plasmid. These results suggest that LMP-1 induces c-Met through the activation of Ets-1.

LMP-1 is reported to be detected in ~60% of invasive NPCs.18,23,34,41 Interestingly, according to Pathmanathan and colleagues,42 LMP-1 was detected in all pre-invasive NPCs that quickly developed into invasive NPCs. Thus, LMP-1-mediated enhancement of metastatic potential could be an early event in NPC, although regulation of LMP-1 expression in NPC remains to be elucidated. Our data, suggesting induction of c-Met by LMP-1, further supports the hypothesis that LMP-1 contributes to the highly metastatic nature of NPC.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Dr. Hirofumi Nagase (Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University) for help with statistical analysis of the data; and Professor Shiann-Yann Lee (Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University) for the conduct of this collaborative work.


    Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to Tomokazu Yoshizaki, Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan. E-mail: tomoy{at}orl.m.kanazawa-u.ac.jp

Supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (no. 10470353) from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.

Accepted for publication April 11, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cassisi NJ: Tumors of the pharynx. Thawley SE Panje WR Batsakis JG Lindberg RD eds. Comprehensive Management of Head and Neck Tumors, 1987, vol 1.:pp 614-683 W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia
  2. Kieff E: Epstein-Barr virus—increasing evidence of a link to carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:724-726[Free Full Text]
  3. Liotta LA: Cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Sci Am 1992, 266:54-63[Medline]
  4. Fidler IJ, Hart IR: Biologic diversity in metastatic neoplasms—origins and implications. Science 1982, 217:998-1001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bhargava MM, Li Y, Joseph A, Jin L, Rosen EM, Goldberg ID: HGF-SF: effects on motility and morphology of normal and tumor cells. EXS 1993, 65:341-349[Medline]
  6. Weidner KM, Behrens J, Vandekerckhove J, Birchmeier W: Scatter factor: molecular characteristics and effect on the invasiveness of epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 1990, 111:2097-2108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bottaro DP, Rubin JS, Faletto DL, Chan AM, Kmiecik TE, Vande Woude GF, Aaronson SA: Identification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor as the c-met proto-oncogene product. Science 1991, 251:802-804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Naldini L, Weidner KM, Vigna E, Gaudino G, Bardelli A, Ponzetto C, Narsimhan RP, Hartmann G, Zarnegar R, Michalopoulos GK, Birchmeier W, Comoglio PM: Scatter factor and hepatocyte growth factor are indistinguishable ligands for the MET receptor. EMBO J 1991, 10:2867-2878[Medline]
  9. Nakajima M, Sawada H, Yamada Y, Watanabe A, Tatsumi M, Yamashita J, Matsuda M, Sakaguchi T, Hirao T, Nakano H: The prognostic significance of amplification and overexpression of c-met and c-erb B-2 in human gastric carcinoma. Cancer 1999, 85:1894-1902[Medline]
  10. Chen BK, Ohtsuki Y, Furihata M, Takeuchi T, Iwata J, Liang SB, Sonobe H: Overexpression of c-Met protein in human thyroid tumors correlated with lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic state. Pathol Res Pract 1999, 195:427-433[Medline]
  11. Sawatsubashi M, Sasatomi E, Mizokami H, Tokunaga O, Shin T: Expression of c-Met in laryngeal carcinoma. Virchows Arch 1998, 432:331-335[Medline]
  12. Furukawa T, Duguid WP, Kobari M, Matsuno S, Tsao MS: Hepatocyte growth factor and Met receptor expression in human pancreatic carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 1995, 147:889-895[Abstract]
  13. Yamashita J, Ogawa M, Yamashita S, Nomura K, Kuramoto M, Saishoji T, Shin S: Immunoreactive hepatocyte growth factor is a strong and independent predictor of recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1994, 54:1630-1633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Young LS, Dawson CW, Clark D, Rupani H, Busson P, Tursz T, Johnson A, Rickinson AB: Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Gen Virol 1988, 69:1051-1065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kaye KM, Izumi MK, Mosialos G, Kieff E: The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 cytoplasmic carboxy terminus is essential for B-lymphocyte transformation: fibroblast cocultivation complements a critical function within the terminal 155 residues. J Virol 1995, 69:675-683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wang D, Liebowitz D, Kieff E: An EBV membrane protein expressed in immortalized lymphocytes transforms established rodent cells. Cell 1985, 43:831-840[Medline]
  17. Kim KR, Yoshizaki T, Miyamori H, Hasegawa K, Horikawa T, Furukawa M, Harada S, Seiki M, Sato H: Transformation of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) induces expression of Ets1 and invasiveness. Oncogene 2000, 19:1764-1771[Medline]
  18. Horikawa T, Yoshizaki T, Sheen TS, Lee SY, Furukawa M: Association of latent membrane protein 1 and matrix metalloproteinase 9 with metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2000, 89:715-723[Medline]
  19. Yoshizaki T, Sato H, Murono S, Pagano JS, Furukawa M: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 is induced by the Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 transactivator. Clin Exp Metastasis 1999, 17:431-436[Medline]
  20. Takeshita H, Yoshizaki T, Miller WE, Sato H, Furukawa M, Pagano JS, Raab-Traub N: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression is induced by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 C-terminal activation regions 1 and 2. J Virol 1999, 73:5548-5555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yoshizaki T, Sato H, Furukawa M, Pagano JS: The expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 is enhanced by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:3621-3626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Raab-Traub N, Flynn K, Klein C, Pizza G, De Vinci C, Occhiuzzi L, Farneti G, Caliceti U, Pirodda E: EBV associated malignancies. J Exp Pathol 1987, 3:449-456[Medline]
  23. Hu LF, Chen F, Zhen QF, Zhang YW, Luo Y, Zheng X, Winberg G, Ernberg I, Klein G: Differences in the growth pattern and clinical course of EBV-LMP1 expressing and non-expressing nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 1995, 31A:658-660
  24. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fangen H: Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase technique: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedure. J Histochem Cytochem 1987, 29:577-580[Abstract]
  25. Marshall DD, Kornberg LJ: Overexpression of scatter factor and its receptor (c-met) in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1998, 108:1413-1417[Medline]
  26. Zanetti A, Stoppacciaro A, Marzullo A, Ciabatta M, Fazioli F, Prat M, Comoglio PM, Baroni CD, Ruco LP: Expression of Met protein and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R) in papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. J Pathol 1998, 186:287-291[Medline]
  27. Nakayama T, Ito M, Ohtsuru A, Naito S, Nakashima M, Sekine I: Expression of the ets-1 proto-oncogene in human thyroid tumor. Mod Pathol 1999, 12:61-68[Medline]
  28. Murono S, Yoshizaki T, Park CS, Furukawa M: Associations of Epstein-Barr virus infection with p53 protein accumulation but not bcl-2 protein in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Histopathology 1999, 34:432-438[Medline]
  29. Wielenga VJ, van Der Voort R, Taher TE, Smit L, Beuling EA, van Krimpen C, Spaargaren M, Pals ST: Expression of c-Met and heparan-sulfate proteoglycan forms of CD44 in colorectal cancer. Am J Pathol 2000, 157:1563-1573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wagatsuma S, Konno R, Sato S, Yajima A: Tumor angiogenesis, hepatocyte growth factor, and c-Met expression in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 1998, 82:520-530[Medline]
  31. Nakada M, Yamashita J, Okada Y, Sato H: Ets-1 positively regulates expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and invasiveness of astrocytic tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999, 58:329-334[Medline]
  32. Kadono Y, Okada Y, Namiki M, Seiki M, Sato H: Transformation of epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney cells with p60 (v-src) induces expression of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase and invasiveness. Cancer Res 1998, 58:2240-2244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kaji M, Yonemura Y, Harada S, Liu X, Terada I, Yamamoto H: Participation of c-met in the progression of human gastric cancers: anti-c-met oligonucleotides inhibit proliferation or invasiveness of gastric cancer cells. Cancer Gene Ther 1996, 3:393-404[Medline]
  34. Fahraeus R, Fu HL, Ernberg I, Finke J, Rowe M, Klein G, Falk K, Nilsson E, Yadav M, Busson P, Tursz T, Kallin B: Expression of Epstein-Barr virus encoded proteins in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1988, 42:329-338[Medline]
  35. Wang F, Gregory C, Sample C, Rowe M, Liebowitz D, Murray R, Rickinson A, Kieff E: Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein (LMP1) and nuclear proteins 2 and 3C are effectors of phenotypic changes in B lymphocytes: EBNA-2 and LMP1 cooperatively induce CD23. J Virol 1990, 64:2309-2318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Henderson S, Rowe M, Gregory C, Croom-Carter D, Wang F, Longnecker R, Kieff E, Rickinson A: Induction of bcl-2 expression by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 protects infected B cells from programmed cell death. Cell 1991, 65:1107-1115[Medline]
  37. Miller WE, Earp HS, Raab-Traub N: The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Virol 1995, 69:4390-4398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Huen DS, Henderson SA, Carter DC, Rowe M: The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) mediates activation of NF-{kappa}B and cell surface phenotype via two effector regions in its carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Oncogene 1995, 10:549-560[Medline]
  39. Eliopoulos AG, Young LS: Activation of the cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway by the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). Oncogene 1998, 16:1731-1742[Medline]
  40. Himelstein BP, Canete SR, Bernhard EJ, Dilks DW, Muschel RJ: Metalloproteinase in tumor progression: the contribution of MMP-9. Invasion Metastasis 1994, 14:246-258[Medline]
  41. Young LS, Dawson CW, Clark D, Rupani H, Busson P, Tursz T, Johnson A, Rickinson AB: Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Gen Virol 1988, 69:1051-1065
  42. Pathmanathan RU, Prasad U, Sadler R, Flynn K, Raab-Traub N: Clonal proliferations of cells infected with Epstein-Barr virus in preinvasive lesions related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:693-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J.-H. Lin, C.-H. Tsai, J.-S. Chu, J.-Y. Chen, K. Takada, and J.-Y. Shew
Dysregulation of HER2/HER3 Signaling Axis in Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected Breast Carcinoma Cells
J. Virol., June 1, 2007; 81(11): 5705 - 5713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Dutton, C. B. Woodman, M. B. Chukwuma, J. I. K. Last, W. Wei, M. Vockerodt, K. R. N. Baumforth, J. R. Flavell, M. Rowe, A. M. R. Taylor, et al.
Bmi-1 is induced by the Epstein-Barr virus oncogene LMP1 and regulates the expression of viral target genes in Hodgkin lymphoma cells
Blood, March 15, 2007; 109(6): 2597 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Horikawa, J. Yang, S. Kondo, T. Yoshizaki, I. Joab, M. Furukawa, and J. S. Pagano
Twist and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Are Induced by the EBV Oncoprotein Latent Membrane Protein 1 and Are Associated with Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 1970 - 1978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Kondo, T. Yoshizaki, N. Wakisaka, T. Horikawa, S. Murono, K. L. Jang, I. Joab, M. Furukawa, and J. S. Pagano
MUC1 Induced by Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 Causes Dissociation of the Cell-Matrix Interaction and Cellular Invasiveness via STAT Signaling
J. Virol., February 15, 2007; 81(4): 1554 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
H.-S. Lin, G. J. Berry, W. E. Fee Jr, D. J. Terris, and Z. Sun
Identification of Tyrosine Kinases Overexpressed in Head and Neck Cancer
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2004; 130(3): 311 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. C. Ma, T. Kijima, G. Maulik, E. A. Fox, M. Sattler, J. D. Griffin, B. E. Johnson, and R. Salgia
c-MET Mutational Analysis in Small Cell Lung Cancer: Novel Juxtamembrane Domain Mutations Regulating Cytoskeletal Functions
Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6272 - 6281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. W. Dawson, G. Tramountanis, A. G. Eliopoulos, and L. S. Young
Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 (LMP1) Activates the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway to Promote Cell Survival and Induce Actin Filament Remodeling
J. Biol. Chem., January 31, 2003; 278(6): 3694 - 3704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Lu, H.-H. Chua, S.-Y. Chen, J.-Y. Chen, and C.-H. Tsai
Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 by Epstein-Barr Virus Proteins
Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 256 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Walker, S. Kermorgant, E. Darai, P. Madelenat, A. C. Cremieux, D. Henin, and T. Lehy
Hepatocyte Growth Factor and c-Met in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Overexpression of Proteins Associated with Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 273 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C.-N. Tsai, C.-L. Tsai, K.-P. Tse, H.-Y. Chang, and Y.-S. Chang
The Epstein-Barr virus oncogene product, latent membrane protein 1, induces the downregulation of E-cadherin gene expression via activation of DNA methyltransferases
PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 10084 - 10089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C.-N. Qian, X. Guo, B. Cao, E. J. Kort, C.-C. Lee, J. Chen, L.-M. Wang, W.-Y. Mai, H.-Q. Min, M.-H. Hong, et al.
Met Protein Expression Level Correlates with Survival in Patients with Late-stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(2): 589 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshizaki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshizaki, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS