| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |


From the Department of Otolaryngology,*
School of
Medicine, and the Department of Molecular Virology and
Oncology,
Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa
University, Kanazawa, Japan; and the Department of
Otolaryngology,
School of Medicine, National
Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the sequential steps of metastasis, tumor cell motility is believed to be one of the indispensable capacities, especially for the locomotion of cells.3,4 Prominent among cell motility-related molecules is the c-Met proto-oncogene product,5,6 which is the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor.7,8 c-Met has been shown to stimulate cell motility and invasion,5,6 and has been reported to be associated with the progression and/or metastasis of a variety of carcinomas.9-13 However, no study concerning c-Met in NPC has been reported to date to our knowledge.
Latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) is an EBV-encoding membrane protein, and one of four EBV gene products (LMP-1, LMP-2A, LMP-2B, and EBV nuclear antigen 1) expressed in NPC tumor cells in latent infection.14 LMP-1 is considered to be the EBV oncoprotein according to the accumulating studies, such as immortalization of human B lymphocytes15 and transformation of rodent fibroblasts16 by LMP-1. In addition to oncogenesis, LMP-1 is suggested to be relevant to the metastatic property of NPC.17-21 Type II and type III EBV related malignancies as represented on NPC, which express LMP-1, show metastatic phenotypes, whereas type I malignancies, such as Burkitt lymphoma and a subset of stomach carcinoma, which lack LMP-1 expression, are characterized by localized growth.22 Also, studies, including ours, report that LMP-1-positive NPCs show a more progressive attitude and an increased tendency toward lymph node metastasis than LMP-1-negative NPCs.18,23 Also, we have recently demonstrated that Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells with LMP-1 expression show enhanced cell motility that is mediated by Ets-1 transcription factor.17 Therefore, we focused on the contribution of c-Met to up-regulation of cell motility system and LMP-1-mediated metastasis in NPC. In this study, we examined the expressions of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 in patients with NPC by immunohistochemical analysis, and studied the associations of these proteins with clinical data. Furthermore, we investigated induction of c-Met by LMP-1 in cell line.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thirty-nine tumor specimens from patients with NPC who underwent treatment at National Taiwan University Hospital in 1997 were used. After tissue samples were obtained, they were embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN), frozen immediately, and stored at -80°C.
Immunohistochemical Staining
Five-µm-thick cryostat serial sections were prepared from frozen tissues. A procedure using a standard avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex method (ABC method24 ) was performed, just as in our previous study.18 Sections were incubated with antibodies to c-Met (clone C-28, dilution 1:25; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), LMP-1 (clone CS1-4, dilution 1:25; DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark), or Ets-1 (clone C-20, dilution 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 4°C overnight. They were exposed to a universal secondary antibody (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) that contained biotinylated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig) G and peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin, followed by 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as a chromogen and hematoxylin as a nuclear counterstain. The specificity of the antibodies to c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 that we used have been previously proven.9,17,18,25 Thyroid papillary carcinoma was used as a positive control for c-Met26 and Ets-1,27 and previously identified LMP-1-positive NPC18,28 was used as a positive control for LMP-1. The specificity of the staining was also confirmed with each batch of stains by the use of serial sections with nonimmune serum instead of the primary antibody as a negative control.
Evaluation of the Specimens
The specimens were evaluated independently by two of the authors
(TH and TY) without previous knowledge of the clinical data, then
reviewed by the others. Two examiners each selected two representative
fields that contained >200 tumor cells and counted both the
immunoreactive cells and the total number of tumor cells. A total of at
least 400 cells were evaluated for each staining. The percentages of
immunoreactive cells showed a wide range of expressions, from 0 to
100% with one peak <10% for c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1. Based on these
data, the results for c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 were classified into
negative and positive categories: negative, <10% immunoreactive
cells; positive,
10% immunoreactive cells. Also, the results for
c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 were classified into three scores depending on
the percentage of immunoreactive cells: expression score 0, <10%
immunoreactive cells; expression score 1, 10 to 50% immunoreactive
cells; expression score 2, >50% immunoreactive cells, which is
consistent with previously published reports.19,27,29,30
The levels of concordance, which were expressed as the percentage of
agreement of the two examiners scores, were 92.3% (36 of 39
specimens) for c-Met and LMP-1 and 84.6% (33 of 39 specimens) for
Ets-1. In the remaining specimens, the score was determined by
discussion among the two examiners and the reviewers.
Plasmids and Expression Vectors
The pcDNA3 eukaryotic expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used for the LMP-1 expression constructs.17,19,20 Ets-1 expression plasmid was constructed by inserting full-length Ets-1 cDNA at the cloning site of pSG5 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).31 The cDNA sequence encoding dominant-negative form of Ets-1 (Ets-DN) was obtained by polymerase chain reaction amplification of human Ets-1 cDNA.17,31 The cDNA fragment thus obtained was inserted behind the ATG start codon introduced into pCEP4 expression vector (Invitrogen) .17,31
Cell Line and Stable Transfection
MDCK cells were obtained from Health Science Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan) and cultured in Dulbeccos modified Eagles minimal essential medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum.17,32 MDCK cells stably expressing LMP-1 were generated by transfecting pcDNA3 plasmid containing LMP-1 open reading frame, and were selected under 600 µg/ml of G418, as described previously.17,32 MDCK cells stably expressing Ets-1 were generated by transfecting pSG5 containing Ets-1 cDNA, and selected under 600 µg/ml G418.31 In addition, MDCK cells expressing LMP-1 were transfected with pCEP4 plasmid containing Ets-DN cDNA fragment, and were then selected under 800 µg/ml of hygromycin B.17
Western Blot Analysis
c-Met protein levels in MDCK cells were analyzed by Western blotting as described previously.20,32 Ten µg of each cell lysate were solubilized to 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) by wet blotting. The membranes were incubated with an antibody to c-Met (clone C-28, dilution 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 2 hours. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (dilution 1:2000, Amersham), reactive bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham). In addition, MKN-45 cell lysate was analyzed in parallel as a positive control of c-Met.33 Expression of 63-kd LMP-1 protein in each cell was also detected with the antibody to LMP-1 (clone CS1-4, dilution 1:1000; DAKO), as previously described.32 To verify the equal protein loading, the actin level in each lane was examined with the antibody to actin (dilution 1:1000; Biomedical Technologies Inc., Stoughton, MA).
Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using Macintosh personal computers (Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA) and Stat View software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA). The expressions of c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 in relation to the clinicopathological data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis rank test, or chi-square test. The correlations among c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 were analyzed with chi-square test. P values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The expression of c-Met protein in NPC samples was
immunohistochemically examined to investigate the association of c-Met
protein with metastasis of NPC. The clinical staging of NPC was
performed based on the International Union Against Cancer TNM
classification and stage grouping (fifth edition 1997). As summarized
in Table 1
, each TNM classification and
stage grouping was divided into two categories, according to the method
used in our previous study.18
The c-Met protein was
immunolocalized on the cell membrane and cytoplasm of the tumor cells
(Figure 1A)
. Some endothelial cells of
microvessels were also immunostained for c-Met (Figure 1B)
. The thyroid
carcinoma section that was used as a positive control for c-Met
immunostaining showed a similar immunostaining signal to the examined
NPC specimens (Figure 1C)
. The section incubated with nonimmune serum
instead of the primary antibody showed no staining (Figure 1D)
. In 30
cases with lymph node metastasis (N1, N2, N3), the mean c-Met
expression score was 1.290 ± 0.783 (the mean ± SD). In
eight cases without lymph node metastasis (N0), the score was
0.500 ± 0.756. Thus, the c-Met expression score in lymph node
metastasis-positive category was significantly higher than that of the
lymph node metastasis-negative category (P =
0.0272) (Figure 2)
. The LMP-1 protein was
detected on the membrane and cytoplasm of the tumor cells (Figure 1, E and F)
, which was consistent with previous
reports.18,26,34
The Ets-1 protein was observed mainly at
the nucleus, and also occasionally on the cytoplasm, of the tumor cells
(Figure 1, G and H)
.17
Infiltrating round cells in the
stroma surrounding tumor nests were also occasionally immunostained for
Ets-1. The thyroid carcinoma section that was used as a positive
control for Ets-1 immunostaining showed a cytoplasmic immunostaining
(Figure 1I)
, as reported previously.27
The expression
scores of LMP-1 and Ets-1 in the lymph node metastasis-positive
category (1.065 ± 0.814 for LMP-1 and 0.935 ± 0.772 for
Ets-1) were higher than those of the lymph node metastasis-negative
category (0.500 ± 0.926 for LMP-1 and 0.375 ± 0.744 for
Ets-1), although the differences were not statistically significant. By
the negative-positive classification, c-Met, LMP-1, and Ets-1 each
significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, as shown in Table 2
(P = 0.0156,
0.0172, and 0.0284, respectively). These results suggest that c-Met,
LMP-1, and Ets-1 may contribute to cervical lymph node metastasis of
NPC.
|
|
|
|
Previously, the contribution of LMP-1 to metastasis of
NPC18
and Ets-1 mediated up-regulation of MDCK cell
motility by LMP-117
was reported. The relationship of
c-Met with LMP-1 and Ets-1 in NPC was examined because the major role
of c-Met is considered to be up-regulation of cell
motility.5,6
c-Met expression was negative (score 0) in 11
cases (28.2%) and positive in 28 cases [71.8%; score 1 in 12 cases
(30.8%) and score 2 in 16 cases (41.0%)] of a total of 39 cases.
LMP-1 expression was negative (score 0) in 15 cases (38.5%), and
positive in 24 cases (61.5%) [score 1 in 11 cases (28.2%) and score
2 in 13 cases (33.3%)]. Ets-1 expression was negative (score 0) in 16
cases (41.0%), and positive in 23 cases [59.0%; score 1 in 14 cases
(35.9%) and score 2 in 9 cases (23.1%)]. As shown in Table 3
, the expressions of LMP-1, Ets-1, and
c-Met were significantly correlated to each other by the
negative-positive classification (LMP-1 versus Ets-1,
P < 0.0001; Ets-1 versus c-Met,
P = 0.0012; LMP-1 versus Met,
P = 0.0005). By score classification, their expressions
were also significantly correlated to each other (LMP-1
versus Ets-1, P = 0.0025; Ets-1
versus c-Met, P = 0.0246; LMP-1
versus Met, P = 0.0043).
|
The data obtained from immunohistochemistry suggested close
association of c-Met with LMP-1 and Ets-1. Therefore, we investigated
if LMP-1 could induce c-Met protein by Western blot analysis. As
demonstrated in Figure 3
, trace amounts
of c-Met protein at the molecular weights of 145 kd were detected in
the parental untransfected MDCK cells and in the cells transfected with
control plasmid. However, c-Met protein was clearly detected in
LMP-1-transfected cells, indicating induction of c-Met protein by
LMP-1. Transfection of Ets-1 expression in MDCK cells also
induced c-Met protein. Previously, we reported induction of Ets-1 by
LMP-1 in MDCK cells. Hence we examined whether induction of c-Met by
LMP-1 is suppressed by inhibiting Ets-1 signal pathway by transfecting
Ets-DN, which lacks a transactivation domain and competitively inhibits
Ets-1 function, in LMP-1-expressing MDCK cells. Interestingly,
co-transfection of Ets-DN in LMP-1-transfected MDCK cells suppressed
induction of c-Met protein. These results suggest that induction of
c-Met by LMP-1 is mediated by activation of Ets-1.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LMP-1 is of particular interest because it resembles a classical
oncogene in its ability to transform rodent fibroblast cell
lines.16
Expression of this viral oncogene in B-cell lines
up-regulates CD23, CD40, CD54, bcl-2, and A20
genes.15,35,36
In epithelical cells, LMP-1 induces
expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and A20
genes.37
In most cases, effects of LMP-1 are mediated
through the activation of nuclear factor-
B and AP-1 by C-terminal
activation region-1 and -2.38,39
We previously reported
that LMP-1 induces matrix metalloproteinase-9,19,20
which
destructs the basement membrane,40
mainly through nuclear
factor-
B. Moreover, LMP-1 enhances the motility of MDCK cells
through the induction of Ets-1.17
Hence, the relationship
of LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met expression with each other in NPC was
examined. Immunohistochemical data suggested a close association of
LMP-1, Ets-1, and c-Met with each other in NPC specimens.
Although the number of immunohistochemically examined NPC specimens may not be conclusive, the Western blotting data clearly indicated induction of c-Met by LMP-1 in MDCK cells. Ets-1 induction by LMP-1 in MDCK cells was demonstrated previously.17 In this study, expression of c-Met is also enhanced by induction of Ets-1. Moreover, induction of c-Met by LMP-1 is inhibited by co-transfection of Ets-DN expression plasmid. These results suggest that LMP-1 induces c-Met through the activation of Ets-1.
LMP-1 is reported to be detected in
60% of invasive
NPCs.18,23,34,41
Interestingly, according to Pathmanathan
and colleagues,42
LMP-1 was detected in all pre-invasive
NPCs that quickly developed into invasive NPCs. Thus, LMP-1-mediated
enhancement of metastatic potential could be an early event in NPC,
although regulation of LMP-1 expression in NPC remains to be
elucidated. Our data, suggesting induction of c-Met by LMP-1, further
supports the hypothesis that LMP-1 contributes to the highly metastatic
nature of NPC.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (no. 10470353) from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.
Accepted for publication April 11, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B and cell surface phenotype via two effector regions in its carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Oncogene 1995, 10:549-560[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-H. Lin, C.-H. Tsai, J.-S. Chu, J.-Y. Chen, K. Takada, and J.-Y. Shew Dysregulation of HER2/HER3 Signaling Axis in Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected Breast Carcinoma Cells J. Virol., June 1, 2007; 81(11): 5705 - 5713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dutton, C. B. Woodman, M. B. Chukwuma, J. I. K. Last, W. Wei, M. Vockerodt, K. R. N. Baumforth, J. R. Flavell, M. Rowe, A. M. R. Taylor, et al. Bmi-1 is induced by the Epstein-Barr virus oncogene LMP1 and regulates the expression of viral target genes in Hodgkin lymphoma cells Blood, March 15, 2007; 109(6): 2597 - 2603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Horikawa, J. Yang, S. Kondo, T. Yoshizaki, I. Joab, M. Furukawa, and J. S. Pagano Twist and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Are Induced by the EBV Oncoprotein Latent Membrane Protein 1 and Are Associated with Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 1970 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kondo, T. Yoshizaki, N. Wakisaka, T. Horikawa, S. Murono, K. L. Jang, I. Joab, M. Furukawa, and J. S. Pagano MUC1 Induced by Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 Causes Dissociation of the Cell-Matrix Interaction and Cellular Invasiveness via STAT Signaling J. Virol., February 15, 2007; 81(4): 1554 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-S. Lin, G. J. Berry, W. E. Fee Jr, D. J. Terris, and Z. Sun Identification of Tyrosine Kinases Overexpressed in Head and Neck Cancer Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2004; 130(3): 311 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Ma, T. Kijima, G. Maulik, E. A. Fox, M. Sattler, J. D. Griffin, B. E. Johnson, and R. Salgia c-MET Mutational Analysis in Small Cell Lung Cancer: Novel Juxtamembrane Domain Mutations Regulating Cytoskeletal Functions Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6272 - 6281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Dawson, G. Tramountanis, A. G. Eliopoulos, and L. S. Young Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 (LMP1) Activates the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway to Promote Cell Survival and Induce Actin Filament Remodeling J. Biol. Chem., January 31, 2003; 278(6): 3694 - 3704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lu, H.-H. Chua, S.-Y. Chen, J.-Y. Chen, and C.-H. Tsai Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 by Epstein-Barr Virus Proteins Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 256 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Walker, S. Kermorgant, E. Darai, P. Madelenat, A. C. Cremieux, D. Henin, and T. Lehy Hepatocyte Growth Factor and c-Met in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Overexpression of Proteins Associated with Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 273 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-N. Tsai, C.-L. Tsai, K.-P. Tse, H.-Y. Chang, and Y.-S. Chang The Epstein-Barr virus oncogene product, latent membrane protein 1, induces the downregulation of E-cadherin gene expression via activation of DNA methyltransferases PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 10084 - 10089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-N. Qian, X. Guo, B. Cao, E. J. Kort, C.-C. Lee, J. Chen, L.-M. Wang, W.-Y. Mai, H.-Q. Min, M.-H. Hong, et al. Met Protein Expression Level Correlates with Survival in Patients with Late-stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(2): 589 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |