| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |
From the Department of Pathology, Lundberg Laboratory for Cancer Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both interstitial cells of Cajal and GIST/GIPACTs characteristically express the KIT protein,3 a type III tyrosine-kinase receptor encoded by the proto-oncogene KIT.4-6 The ligand for KIT is the stem cell factor, also known as Steel factor.7 The KIT receptor is essential for the development of the interstitial cells of Cajal, which are responsible for initiating and propagating slow wave activity in gastrointestinal muscles as well as mediating motor input from the enteric nervous system.8-13
The occurrence of activating mutations involving exon 11 of KIT in sporadic GIST/GIPACTs3,14 and the association of exon 11 germline mutations with multicentric GIST/GIPACTs15-17 indicate they are important in GIST/GIPACTs tumorigenesis. Reports regarding the frequency of mutations in exon 11, however, vary widely, ranging from 30% to nearly 100%.3,18-23 There are also conflicting reports with respect to the association between exon 11 mutations and malignant histology and/or aggressive, malignant behavior. Although some investigators have found a positive correlation between the two and have suggested mutation screening as a potential prognosticator,18-21 others have not been able to verify these findings.22 In addition, there have been recent reports of GIST/GIPACTs that lack mutations in exon 11 but have activating mutations of exons 924-26 and 1324,25,27 of the KIT gene.
Alternative splicing in the 3'end of exon 9 of the KIT transcript gives rise to two different isoforms of the KIT protein that differ in length by four amino acids and are referred to as GNNK+/GNNK- or KitA+/Kit+.28,29 Preferential expression of the shorter isoform of the protein has been observed in a number of neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia30 and human germ cell tumors.31 Caruana and colleagues32 have shown that the GNNK- isoform is tumorigenic in NIH3T3 cells, whereas the GNNK+ isoform is not. Thus far, there are no reports of the relative distribution of the two KIT isoforms in GIST/GIPACTs.
Previous cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic studies have shown primarily three recurrent abnormalities, including terminal deletions of 1p and complete or partial losses of chromosomes 14 and 22.33-38
Our study aimed to investigate the spectrum of KIT mutations in GIST/GIPACTs as well as the interrelationship between these mutations, KIT isoform expression, cytogenetic and phenotypic characteristics, and clinical behavior.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pertinent clinical and morphological data are summarized in
Table 1
. Fourteen tumors from 12 patients
were analyzed; 6 were primary tumors, 1 a local recurrence, and 7
metastases (in one patient both the primary tumor and a metastasis were
analyzed and in another patient two metachronous metastases were
studied). The primary tumors arose in the small intestine
(n = 7), stomach (n = 4),
and rectum (n = 1) and were histologically
classified as predominantly spindled, epithelioid, or mixed-spindled
epithelioid as well as benign-appearing, borderline, or malignant based
on cellularity, pleomorphism, mitotic activity, necrosis, and growth
pattern. Immunohistochemically, all tumors were strongly CD117
(KIT)-positive, 10 of 14 tumors were CD34-positive, and 4 of 14 were
focally positive for
-smooth muscle actin. All tumors were negative
for desmin, S-100 protein, and chromogranin. Ki67 (MIB-1)-labeling
index ranged from <1% in benign and borderline tumors to 5 to 30% in
malignant tumors. None of the patients in this study received radiation
therapy or chemotherapy; all primary and metastatic tumors were treated
solely by surgical resection.
|
RNA was prepared from 14 fresh frozen GIST/GIPACTs using the Fast
Prep System (FastRNA Green; Qbiogene, Illkirch Cedex, France). cDNA was
prepared with poly T-primers and RNA as template. All primers (Table 2)
were designed using the Unigene
Representative Sequence (X06182) for KIT mRNA as template.
|
In five cases, the complete coding region was amplified and directly
sequenced using eight primer pairs (Table 2)
. Alignments and mutation
scanning were performed using Auto Assembler (Applied Biosystems),
BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD) and
ClustalW (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). The Unigene
Representative Sequence for KIT mRNA (X06182) was used for
the alignments.
PCR Amplification of the 3' End of Exon 9 of the KIT Gene
The expression pattern of the two KIT transcript isoforms was analyzed by PCR using cDNA as template. cDNA from human bone marrow and human fetal liver were used as controls. The primers PCRKIT3s and PCRKIT4as were used.32 The PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on 4% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Quantification of the PCR products was performed using a Molecular Imager FX (BioRad, Hercules, CA).
Cytogenetic and SKY Analyses
Primary cultures were established from fresh specimens of cases 3, 4a and 4b, 5a and 5b, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11 as described.39 Chromosome preparations were made from exponentially growing primary cultures, and these were subsequently G-banded and analyzed using standard procedures.40
Slides (3- to 5-days-old) were treated with a pepsin solution (12 µg/ml) for 4 minutes before hybridization. The SkyPaint probe used contained a cocktail of 24 differentially labeled chromosome-specific painting probes (ASI-Applied Spectral Imaging Ltd., Migdal Ha'Emek, Israel). The conditions for hybridization, posthybridization washes, and detection were essentially as recommended by the manufacturer. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2'-phenylindole dihydrochloride) containing an anti-fade solution. Image acquisition was achieved with the SpectraCube system (ASI) mounted on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 Imaging microscope equipped with a custom designed optical filter cube (SKY-1; Chroma Technology, Brattleboro, VT) and a DAPI filter.41 Analysis of spectral images was performed using the SkyView software (ASI).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eleven different KIT mutations were detected in 10 of
14 tumors (Figure 1)
. No mutations were
detected in exons 9, 10, 12, and 13. Nine tumors had mutations in exon
11, all between nucleotides 1690 and 1704 (amino acids 557 and 561).
Seven of the 11 tumors investigated for mutations in exons 12 to 15 had
one or two mutations involving exons 14 and 15, which have not been
previously reported in GIST/GIPACTs. These two new mutations included
deletion of three nucleotides, 2162 A, 2163 G, and 2164 C, in exon 15,
encoding serine in position 715 (7 of 11 tumors) and deletion of six
nucleotides, 2129 A, 2130 T, 2131 A, 2132 A, 2133 G, and 2134 A, in
exon 14, encoding asparagine and lysine in positions 704 and 705 (one
tumor). The mutations were detected in
50% of the clones from each
tumor, indicating that only one allele was mutated. Six of nine tumors
with mutations in exon 11 had one or more additional mutations
involving exons 14 and 15. All detected mutations were in-frame. No
mutations were detected in four tumors in which the complete coding
region was sequenced.
|
All tumors contained two variants of the KIT transcript
that differed in length by 12 nucleotides (Figure 2)
as shown by PCR amplification and/or
sequence analysis. These 12 nucleotides correspond to the following
four amino acids: GNNK (position 510 to 513). Thus, GIST/GIPACTs
expressed both isoforms of the KIT transcript. As shown in
Figure 2
, there was preferential expression of the shorter isoform with
a GNNK-/GNNK+ ratio varying between 1.5 and 2.7.
|
Cytogenetic analyses were performed in 10 malignant GIST/GIPACTs
from eight patients. Diploid or near-diploid karyotypes predominated in
nine tumors; one tumor had karyotypes in the near-triploid mode. The
karyotypes, based on G-banding alone or G-banding in combination with
SKY (cases 5b and 7), are shown in Table 1
and Figure 3
. Clonal abnormalities were detected in
eight tumors. Two tumors had normal karyotypes. Three tumors had simple
numerical abnormalities, including; -21; +7 and -22; and -22. Two
metastatic lesions (cases 5b and 7) had complex karyotypes with both
numerical and structural changes. Detailed comparisons of the G-banded
karyotypes with the SKY and DAPI band images allowed clarification of
nearly all marker chromosomes in these two tumors. In addition to other
abnormalities, both tumors had terminal 1p deletions and losses of
chromosomes 14 and 22. Another GIST/GIPACT (case 8) contained a variant
cell, which in addition to -22, had a del(1)(p32).
|
Two different mutations involving exon 11 (substitution) and exon 15 (deletion) were detected in the only benign GIST/GIPACT in our series (<1 cm in size and an incidental finding in the small intestine). Two different mutations involving exon 11 (substitution) and exon 15 (deletion) were also found in a 7-cm borderline tumor of the small intestine (the patient is alive and well 9 years after surgery). Of 10 patients with histologically malignant tumors, 9 developed metastases, 1 had a local recurrence, and 8 died within an average of 2 years (range, 8 months to 4 years). Mutations were detected in 8 of 12 tumors from these patients, including 1 of 4 primary tumors, 6 of 7 metastases, and 1 local recurrence. The mutations consisted of 19 deletions (exons 11, 14, and 15), six substitutions (exon 11), and one insertion (exon 11).
Multiple tumors were analyzed in two cases (Table 1
, cases 4 and 5).
The primary tumor in case 4 revealed no mutations, whereas the
metastasis had one mutation involving exon 15. Both the primary tumor
and the metastasis in this case had similar chromosome rearrangements.
Two metastases occurring 8 months and 3 years after the primary tumor
were analyzed in case 5. The first metastasis had two mutations
involving exons 11 and 15 whereas the later metastasis had two
different mutations in exon 11 as well as the same deletion in exon 15
as the first metastasis. The first metastasis had a normal karyotype
and the later metastasis had a hypodiploid karyotype with complex
rearrangements including del(1p), -14, and -22 (Figure 3)
.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G (E642K) as reported by others.24
These findings
correspond with two large studies of 200 and 133 GIST/GIPACTs in which
exon 9 mutations were found to be rare (3% and 5%,
respectively)25,26
and exon 13 mutations even rarer
(1%).25 In addition to reported mutations in exon 11, we also found two new mutations involving exons 14 and 15 in benign, borderline, and malignant tumors and detected multiple mutations in different exons. Although not previously described in the literature, multiple mutations were quite common in our series; six of nine tumors with mutations in exon 11 had one or two additional mutations in exons 14 and 15. The functional consequences of these additional mutations that occur in the intracellular domain of the KIT receptor are unclear and require further exploration in those tumors that also have activating mutations of exon 11. Signaling events, such as binding of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, need further exploration.43-45
All mutations in our series resulted in in-frame transcripts. Constitutive autophosphorylation without stem cell factor stimulation has also been reported in transfection studies of GIST/GIPACTs with mutations of exons 9, 11, and 13.3,14,26,27 These observations suggest that the broad spectrum of KIT mutations in GIST/GIPACTs does not reflect general genetic instability and that the tumor cells select for mutated proteins.
The preferential expression of the shorter isoform (GNNK-) in GIST/GIPACTs has not been previously reported and is similar to expression patterns reported in other malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia30 and germ cell tumors.31 The shorter isoform has also been shown to be tumorigenic in NIH3T3 cells, whereas the GNNK+ isoform has not.32 The two isoforms arise because of alternate 5' splice donor sites in the 3'-end of exon 9. The 7 nucleotide-long tandem repeat (AAAGGTA) occurring in the 3'-end may account for the alternative splicing. The isoform expression pattern of normal interstitial cells of Cajal has not been analyzed, hence the biological significance of preferential GNNK-expression in GIST/GIPACTs is unknown. The shorter isoform has been shown to display stronger receptor phosphorylation and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway than the GNNK+ isoform.32 Preferential expression of the shorter isoform could be significant in tumors lacking activating mutations and serve as an alternative mechanism for increased KIT signaling.
Cytogenetic and SKY analyses of 10 GIST/GIPACTs revealed several recurrent structural and numerical abnormalities, including terminal deletions of 1p in two cases (another case had a single variant cell with a 1p deletion), gain of chromosome 7 in three cases, and losses of chromosomes 14 and 22 in two and five cases, respectively. Two cases had 1p deletions, -14, and -22. These three abnormalities are the most commonly reported clonal changes33-38 identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization, comparative genomic hybridization, and loss of heterozygosity analyses.23,46-50
To date, no recurrent translocations have been identified in GIST/GIPACTs. Bardi and colleagues34 have described a case with a derivative chromosome 20 resulting from a t(13;20)(q12;p13). A similar or identical translocation was observed in our case 7 that was near-triploid and showed losses of chromosomes 14 and 22. Most of the abnormalities detected in our series of GIST/GIPACTs consisted of losses of whole or parts of chromosomes, suggesting that loss of multiple chromosomal regions, presumably containing putative tumor suppressor genes, might be an important genetic event in GIST/GIPACTs.
The problem of predicting clinical behavior based solely on morphological features in GIST/GIPACTs is well known. The potential utility of detecting activating KIT mutations and/or chromosome abnormalities as markers of aggressive behavior has therefore aroused great interest. There are a number of recent studies attempting to correlate mutations and/or chromosome abnormalities with histological features and clinical course. The results of these studies have been conflicting; although some have shown a clear correlation between mutations, histology, and clinical behavior,18-21,46,47,49 others have not.22 These studies have focused on mutations in exon 11 and are thus quite limited considering the broad spectrum of mutations occurring in GIST/GIPACTs.
Although our series is relatively small compared to other correlative studies, the mutations occurring in primary, recurrent, and metastatic tumors have been extensively analyzed. The two histologically benign and borderline tumors in our series with long-term disease-free survival had mutations in exons 11 and 15. In contrast, 4 of 12 histologically and clinically malignant tumors in which the entire coding region was sequenced had no mutations. These findings indicate there is no clear correlation between activating KIT mutations and biological behavior.
The complexity of GIST/GIPACT mutations and chromosome rearrangements
is further demonstrated by two patients with metastatic tumors in our
series. In case 4 (Table 1)
, the metastases had a mutation in exon 15
whereas the primary tumor had none. In case 5, the first metastasis had
two mutations (exon 11 V560D and exon 15 S715del) whereas a later
metastasis had three mutations. Two of three mutations differed from
the first metastatic tumor and involved exon 11 (K558N,
K558_V559insP) as well as exon 15 (S715del). These findings suggest
that the tumor cell population of GIST/GIPACTs is heterogeneous.
In summary, the observations of clinically benign GIST/GIPACTs with multiple KIT mutations involving different exons, metastasizing tumors lacking mutations, as well as the loss and addition of mutations during the course of the disease, all indicate that the correlation between KIT mutations and clinical behavior is far more complex than initially appreciated. Apparently a malignant phenotype may be acquired without activating mutations and multiple mutations may occur in clinically benign tumors. Detection of multiple and variable KIT mutations in primary tumors, metastases, and different generations of metastases in the same patient suggest the existence of subpopulations of tumor cells with different mutations.
Our findings are particularly relevant with regard to a recent report in which a patient with metastatic GIST/GIPACT was successfully treated with the newly developed phenylaminopyrimidine derivative, STI571 (Glivec; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland).51 This drug selectively inhibits the tyrosine signaling of a group of closely related tyrosine kinase receptors, including KIT, PDGFR, and ABL.52 In addition to large scale drug trials in leukemia, there are ongoing trials evaluating its efficacy in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic GIST/GIPACTs. Thus, continued investigation of the wide, complex spectrum of KIT mutations as well as their functional consequences in a large series of GIST/GIPACTs correlated with phenotype, clinical behavior, and treatment response is imperative. Further studies analyzing whether treatment effects are restricted to GIST/GIPACTs with KIT receptor signaling alterations secondary to activating mutations are also needed.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Supported by the Swedish Society for Cancer Research, the Inga-Britt and Arne Lundberg Research Foundation, the Johan Jansson Foundation for Cancer Research.
Accepted for publication September 20, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in Am J Pathol:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Bougherara, F. Subra, R. Crepin, P. Tauc, C. Auclair, and M.-A. Poul The Aberrant Localization of Oncogenic Kit Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Mutants Is Reversed on Specific Inhibitory Treatment Mol. Cancer Res., September 1, 2009; 7(9): 1525 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Kim, M.-H. Ryu, H. Lee, S. J. Sym, J.-L. Lee, H. M. Chang, Y. S. Park, K. H. Lee, W. K. Kang, D. B. Shin, et al. Kinase Mutations and Efficacy of Imatinib in Korean Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Oncologist, May 1, 2009; 14(5): 540 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Tornillo and L M Terracciano An update on molecular genetics of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2006; 59(6): 557 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gotlib, C. Berube, J. D. Growney, C.-C. Chen, T. I. George, C. Williams, T. Kajiguchi, J. Ruan, S. L. Lilleberg, J. A. Durocher, et al. Activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor PKC412 in a patient with mast cell leukemia with the D816V KIT mutation Blood, October 15, 2005; 106(8): 2865 - 2870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimura, N. Jones, M. Kluppel, M. Hirashima, K. Tachibana, J. B. Cohn, J. L. Wrana, T. Pawson, and A. Bernstein Targeted mutations of the juxtamembrane tyrosines in the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase selectively affect multiple cell lineages PNAS, April 20, 2004; 101(16): 6015 - 6020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Kaelin Jr. Gleevec: Prototype or Outlier? Sci. Signal., March 23, 2004; 2004(225): pe12 - pe12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gonzalez, E. J. Andreu, A. Panizo, S. Inoges, A. Fontalba, J. L. Fernandez-Luna, M. Gaboli, L. Sierrasesumaga, S. Martin-Algarra, J. Pardo, et al. Imatinib Inhibits Proliferation of Ewing Tumor Cells Mediated by the Stem Cell Factor/KIT Receptor Pathway, and Sensitizes Cells to Vincristine and Doxorubicin-Induced Apoptosis Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 751 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Antonescu, G. Sommer, L. Sarran, S. J. Tschernyavsky, E. Riedel, J. M. Woodruff, M. Robson, R. Maki, M. F. Brennan, M. Ladanyi, et al. Association of KIT Exon 9 Mutations with Nongastric Primary Site and Aggressive Behavior: KIT Mutation Analysis and Clinical Correlates of 120 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3329 - 3337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rosai GIST: An Update International Journal of Surgical Pathology, July 1, 2003; 11(3): 177 - 186. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dagher, M. Cohen, G. Williams, M. Rothmann, J. Gobburu, G. Robbie, A. Rahman, G. Chen, A. Staten, D. Griebel, et al. Approval Summary: Imatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Metastatic and/or Unresectable Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 3034 - 3038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Cohen, R. Dagher, D. J. Griebel, A. Ibrahim, A. Martin, N. S. Scher, G. H. Sokol, G. A. Williams, and R. Pazdur U.S. Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval Summaries: Imatinib Mesylate, Mesna Tablets, and Zoledronic Acid Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(5): 393 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Fletcher, C. D.M. Fletcher, B. P. Rubin, L. K. Ashman, C. L. Corless, M. C. Heinrich, J. Andersson, H. Sjogren, J. Meis-Kindblom, G. Stenman, et al. KIT Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors : More Complex than Previously Recognized? Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2002; 161(2): 737 - 739. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lasota, J. Kopczynski, M. Majidi, M. Miettinen, and M. Sarlomo-Rikala Apparent KIT Ser715 Deletion in GIST mRNA Is Not Detectable in Genomic DNA and Represents a Previously Known Splice Variant of KIT Transcript Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2002; 161(2): 739 - 741. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |