| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |




From the Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, andAllergy,*
Brigham and Womens Hospital, and the Departmentof Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Schoolof Pathology,
Inflammation Research Unit,University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; and the ImmunexCorporation,
Seattle, Washington
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chain that contains immunoreceptor tyrosine-based
activation motifs. We studied the expression of inhibitory and
activating LIRs in the synovium of six RA patients, three
osteoarthritis patients, and three controls by
immunohistochemistry. The synovium from patients with early RA showed
extensive expression of the inhibitory LIR-2 and the activating LIR-7
on macrophages and neutrophils. Some mast cells and endothelial cells
expressed LIR-7. There was limited expression of LIRs in synovium from
two patients with long-standing RA, patients with
osteoarthritis, and controls. LIR-2 recognizes MHC class I
molecules. We therefore suggest that LIRs may regulate the activation
of infiltrating leukocytes in synovial tissue and are a potential
therapeutic target.
that are
central to the pathogenesis of RA as evidenced by the efficacy of
disease-modifying therapies targeted at these cytokines.15
The joint destruction in RA is likely mediated by proteases derived
from macrophages and osteoclasts. Although there is abundant evidence
for the presence of activated leukocytes in rheumatoid synovium, the
mechanism(s) and regulation of their activation are not fully
elucidated and the fundamental underlying etiology of RA remains
obscure.
Inflammatory responses are likely
regulated by a complex network of inhibitory and activating signals.
The leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors (LIRs), also termed
immunoglobulin-like transcripts (ILTs), comprise a new family of cell
surface proteins that have been shown in vitro to modulate
cellular responses through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory
motifs (ITIMs) or through association with the Fc receptor
chain
that contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation
motif.16-18
The inhibitory LIRs (LIRs-1, -2, -3, -5, and
-8) display long cytoplasmic domains with two to four ITIMs. These
receptors mediate inhibition of cell activation by recruiting the
src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing phosphatase 1 (SHP-1)
to inhibit or terminate signaling through nonreceptor tyrosine kinase
cascades.19-22
The activating LIRs (LIR-6a, LIR-6b,
LIR-7, ILT-8, and ILT-11) are characterized by a short cytoplasmic
domain and a positively charged arginine residue within the
transmembrane domain that facilitates association with the common Fc
receptor
chain that contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based
activation motif.23
Cross-linking of LIR-7 elicited
Ca2+-flux in monocytes, transfected P815 cells,
and RBL cells.23
A third type of LIR (LIR-4) is a soluble
molecule with no transmembrane domain. Although LIR-1 and LIR-2 are
known to interact with class I molecules with broad specificity
recognizing classical class I alleles within HLA-A, -B, -C, and the
nonclassical HLA-G,21,24,25
the ligands for most of the
LIRs are not known.
The cellular distribution of LIR-1, LIR-2, LIR-5, and LIR-7 has been studied in detail using monoclonal antibodies. LIR-1 is expressed on all peripheral blood monocytes, in vitro-derived dendritic cells and macrophages, B cells, and a subset of T cells and NK cells.18,24 A more restricted cellular distribution was reported for LIR-2 and LIR-5, which are most prominent on monocytes and dendritic cells.21 LIR-7 is expressed in all peripheral blood monocytes and granulocytes, in vitro-derived macrophages, and dendritic cells.23 Expression of the other LIRs has only been determined at the mRNA level. Transcripts for LIR-3 and LIR-6 were detected in monocytes and B cells,16,17 transcripts for LIR-4 were detected in B cells, NK cells, and monocytes,16,17 whereas transcripts for LIR-8 were detected only in NK cells.17
The expression of LIRs in normal and inflamed tissues has not been studied. The aim of this study was, therefore, to compare the in vivo expression and cellular distribution of activating and inhibitory LIRs in RA, in osteoarthritis (OA), and in normal synovium. OA synovium was included as a control because inflammatory reactions in the synovial tissue in OA occur in the absence of pannus formation and tissue invasion.26,27 We used immunohistochemistry with specific monoclonal antibodies to detect expression of LIRs. Serial sections stained with cell lineage-specific antibodies were used to evaluate the cellular localization of expressed LIRs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six patients with a history of RA ranging from 2 to 14 years and three patients with a history of OA ranging from 3 to 13 years underwent excision of synovial tissue from the knee joint under general anesthesia. Normal synovial tissue was obtained from three patients during re-constructive knee surgery for traumatic meniscus rupture. The institutional ethics committees approved this study.
Immunohistochemical Studies
Synovial tissue was embedded in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek; Miles, Elkhart, IN), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sectioned at 2 to 4 µm for histopathological analysis and immunohistochemical studies. Specific mouse IgG1 monoclonal antibodies against LIR-2, LIR-3, and LIR-7 were generated in BALB/c mice by immunization with LIR-Fc fusion proteins containing the LIR extracellular domains fused to the Fc region of human IgG1 as described.24,28 The antibodies were screened for binding specificity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay against a panel of LIR-Fc fusion proteins and by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis using COS-1 cells transfected with full-length LIR cDNAs. Irrelevant mouse IgG1-negative control was purchased from Biosource International (Camarillo, CA). These antibodies were used in a three-step alkaline-phosphatase staining technique as described elsewhere.29 In brief, acetone-fixed sections were equilibrated with Tris-buffered saline and blocked with neat horse serum for 20 minutes at room temperature. Sections were then incubated with 5 µg/ml of primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After four washes with Tris-buffered saline, sections were incubated with biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1 hour at room temperature. After four washes with Tris-buffered saline, sections were incubated with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Vector Laboratories) for 45 minutes at room temperature. Immunoreactivity was detected using a colorimetric alkaline-phosphatase substrate (Vector Red, Vector Laboratories) and brief counter staining with hematoxylin. Optimal conditions for use of each anti-LIR antibody were initially defined using a panel of normal tissues likely to contain LIR-expressing cells; skin, thymus, lymph nodes, tonsil, and small intestine.
Immunohistochemical studies of adjacent sections were undertaken to determine the specific cell types that are immunoreactive to the LIRs as described elsewhere.29,30 Antibodies to detect macrophages (mouse IgG1 anti-CD68), T cells (rabbit polyclonal anti-CD3), endothelial cells (mouse IgG1 anti-Von-Willebrand factor), neutrophil cathepsin G (rabbit polyclonal), and mast cell tryptase (mouse IgG1) were purchased from DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark).
In addition to the immunohistochemical staining, a standard hematoxylin and eosin stain was used to evaluate the quality and histology of each section.
Semiquantitative Evaluation of Expression
The tissue sections from the immunohistochemical studies were evaluated by counting contiguous fields across the whole section as described elsewhere.30 In brief, an average of 18 fields at a magnification of x250 was selected per section in a systematic sampling procedure. After ensuring that the sections stained with isotype control exhibited no significant immunoreactivity, the number of positive cells (red staining) per field was enumerated. Although significant regional variation in staining was observed, the median count for the whole section is reported as a conservative measure of the staining for each antibody.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The histological features of synovial tissues and the expression
of LIRs are summarized in Table 1
.
Sections from two RA patients (RA1 and RA2) with a shorter duration of
illness (2 to 5 years) showed extensive infiltration with inflammatory
cells including CD68-positive macrophages, cathepsin G-positive
neutrophils, a moderate number of tryptase-positive mast cells, and
clusters of CD3-positive T cells. In the remaining four RA patients
there were varying degrees of inflammatory cell infiltration and tissue
fibrosis. There was significant macrophage infiltration with limited
numbers of T cells and mast cells in sections obtained from two
patients with OA (Table 1)
. The third patient with OA had extensive
fibrosis with macrophages at the outer edges of the synovial membrane.
Few or no inflammatory cells were detected in all sections obtained
from normal individuals.
|
To examine expression of LIR proteins in synovial tissue, we began with two inhibitory receptors, LIR-2 and LIR-3, and one activating receptor, LIR-7. These LIRs have a relatively restricted expression on cells of myeloid origin, which are important sources of cytokines and proteases in RA.1 Furthermore, LIR-2 is known to recognize MHC class I molecules, which are widely distributed in human tissues.
There was extensive expression of LIR-2 and LIR-7 in sections obtained
from three RA patients with early to intermediate duration of illness
(Table 1
; RA1, RA2, and RA3). The expression of LIR-2 and LIR-7 was
extremely limited for patients with a long duration of RA and was
negligible in patients with OA. The expression of LIR-3 in all patients
with RA and OA was variable and limited. None of the LIRs were
expressed in control tissues obtained from normal individuals.
Cellular Source of LIR Expression in RA
The cellular localization of LIRs in synovial tissue is summarized
for all patients in Table 2
and
illustrated for patients RA1 and RA2 in Figures 1 and 2
.
The cellular distribution of LIR-2 and LIR-7 differed among RA patients
reflecting the nature of the inflammatory cell infiltrate. Neutrophils
were the major cellular source of LIR-2 in one patient (RA1; Figure 1, A and C
). Macrophages were the major cellular source of LIR-2 in
another patient (RA2; Figure 1, E and G
). Expression of LIR-7 was
somewhat less than that of LIR-2 and the cellular distribution of LIR-7
was wider than that of LIR-2 (Table 2)
. LIR-7 was expressed by
neutrophils (Figure 1, B and C)
, macrophages, mast cells (Figure 1, B and C
, inset) and endothelial cells in patient RA1, and by macrophages
(Figure 1, F and G)
, endothelial cells (Figure 2B)
, and fibroblast-like
cells in patient RA2. The cellular sources of LIR-2 and -7 in all
remaining RA patients were macrophages and to a lesser extent
endothelial cells (figure not shown). The limited expression of LIR-2
in OA was observed mainly on CD68+ macrophages. LIR-3 was exclusively
expressed by macrophages and fibroblast-like cells (Table 2
, Figure 2A
)
in patients with RA. Isotype-matched negative control antibodies did
not yield immunostaining in any patient (Figure 1, D and H
, and Figure 2C
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated the expression of LIR-2 (inhibitory), LIR-3 (inhibitory), and LIR-7 (activating) on infiltrating leukocytes in rheumatoid synovium. The expression of LIR-2, LIR-3, and LIR-7 on CD68-positive cells, likely macrophage-like synoviocytes, is consistent with previous studies describing their expression on peripheral blood monocytes and in vitro-derived macrophages.16,17,23 There is limited data on the expression of LIRs on circulating granulocytes. Nevertheless, the expression of LIR-2, LIR-3, and LIR-7 on neutrophils infiltrating the rheumatoid synovium is consistent with published data for LIR-723 and with our unpublished findings for all three of these LIRs on circulating polymorphonuclear leukocytes (N Tedla and JP Arm, unpublished observations). In contrast to the restricted expression of LIR-2 and LIR-3 on inflammatory leukocytes, LIR-7 was variably expressed on mast cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells in rheumatoid synovium. We have previously reported transcripts for LIR-3, but not LIR-4 or LIR-5, in human pulmonary mast cells using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.16 The lack of staining for LIR-3 in mast cells in rheumatoid synovium may reflect mast cell heterogeneity, regulated expression at sites of inflammation, or the sensitivity of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in picking up low levels of transcripts not accompanied by significant expression of protein. Nevertheless, related mouse molecules, the paired Ig-like receptors, and gp49 are expressed on mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells.31-34 The demonstration of LIR-7 on fibroblast-like cells, most probably type B synoviocytes, and on endothelium is entirely novel and suggests a range of functions beyond the regulation of leukocyte activation, such as participation in cell adhesion, cell recruitment, or fibrogenesis.
The expression of LIR-2 and LIR-7 was especially marked in early
rheumatoid disease (Table 1)
. With increasing duration of disease the
synovial tissue showed more fibrotic changes and the number of cells
expressing LIR-2 and LIR-7 dramatically decreased. Similar to the late
stages of RA, we found limited expression of both the activating and
inhibitory LIRs in the synovium obtained from patients with OA. No LIRs
were detected in synovial tissue from normal donors. These observations
may indicate that these molecules are preferentially present in active
inflammatory conditions that are characterized by extensive leukocyte
infiltration and play a limited role in chronic degenerative conditions
or chronic inflammatory states in which there is established fibrosis.
Little is known about the factors that regulate the expression of LIRs.
Nevertheless, the prominence of LIR-2 and LIR-7 in early RA as opposed
to late disease, their sparse expression in the cellular infiltrate in
OA, and their expression on endothelium and mast cells in early RA but
not OA or normal tissue (Table 2
; Figures 1 and 2
), suggest that not
only are LIRs expressed in leukocytes but also there is regulated
expression of LIRs in tissues.
It has been suggested that LIRs and related molecules may determine the
threshold and/or extent of activation of leukocytes. This idea is
supported by recent studies in mice with disruption of mouse
gp49B1.35
gp49B1 has two Ig-like extracellular domains,
homologous to those of the LIRs.36
It belongs to the
inhibitory class of this family of molecules with two ITIMs in its
cytoplasmic domain. Co-ligation of gp49B with Fc
RI on mast cells
inhibits signaling though the latter receptor through recruitment of
SHP-1, which is dependent on the phosphorylated ITIMs of
gp49B1.37,38
Mice with disruption of gp49B1 demonstrated a
significantly increased sensitivity to IgE-dependent passive cutaneous
anaphylaxis with greater tissue edema and mast cell degranulation.
Significantly, the absence of gp49B1 resulted in a lower threshold for
antigen challenge in active cutaneous anaphylaxis and increased
mortality in active systemic anaphylaxis.35
These data
provide proof of principle for a role of the homologous LIRs in
regulating the threshold for activation of inflammatory cells and in
determining the severity of inflammation in vivo. The range
of ligands recognized by the large family of LIRs has yet to be
appreciated. Nevertheless, LIR-2 recognizes and regulates cellular
responses through recognition of a diverse array of MHC class I
molecules.28
Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the
regulated expression of LIR-2 on leukocytes infiltrating the rheumatoid
synovium may determine their threshold of activation. On the other
hand, LIR-2 and the activating LIR-7 were both expressed on neutrophils
and macrophages infiltrating the rheumatoid synovium (Figure 1)
. Thus,
the relative balance of inhibitory and activating LIRs expressed by a
particular cell may play an important role in determining its
activation response.
The range of cellular responses regulated by LIRs has been studied
in vitro. Thus, recognition of MHC class I molecules by
LIR-1 or LIR-2 inhibits natural killer cell activity and T cell
cytotoxicity.20,28
Engagement of LIR-1, LIR-2, or LIR-3 by
plate-bound antibodies led to inhibition of IgE-dependent exocytosis of
RBL cells.20,21
Co-ligation of inhibitory LIR-1, LIR-2,
LIR-3, or LIR-5 with an activating receptor such as the BCR, TCR,
Fc
R, or MHC class II molecules led to inhibition of
Ca2+ flux and subsequent downstream events
elicited by the activating molecule.19-21,39
These events
have recently been elucidated for the interaction of LIR-1 with the
TCR.22
In this study, the ITIM of LIR-1 was phosphorylated
by the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase lck, leading to
recruitment of SHP-1, inhibition of phosphorylation of LAT, and the TCR
chain, inhibition of the association of ZAP-70 with the TCR
chain, and inhibition of ERK activation. The full spectrum of responses
inhibited or elicited by inhibitory and activating LIRs, respectively,
has yet to be elucidated. It is tempting to speculate that LIRs may
regulate protease and cytokine expression in the inflammatory
infiltrate in RA and thereby regulate the process of pannus formation
and joint destruction. The LIRs also provide a potential novel
therapeutic target in pathological inflammatory processes such as
rheumatoid arthritis. Definitive demonstration of a role for LIRs in
regulating inflammation in vivo awaits the development of
specific agonists and antagonists.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by National Institutes of Health grant U19 AI 31599 and a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Arthritis Foundation.
Accepted for publication November 6, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned? Annu Rev Immunol 2001, 19:163-196[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Tedla, C.-W. Lee, L. Borges, C. L. Geczy, and J. P. Arm Differential expression of leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors on cord blood-derived human mast cell progenitors and mature mast cells J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2008; 83(2): 334 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ochi, M. Shinohara, K. Sato, H.-J. Gober, T. Koga, T. Kodama, T. Takai, N. Miyasaka, and H. Takayanagi Pathological role of osteoclast costimulation in arthritis-induced bone loss PNAS, July 3, 2007; 104(27): 11394 - 11399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Huynh, T. Hampartzoumian, J. P. Arm, J. Hunt, L. Borges, M. Ahern, M. Smith, C. L. Geczy, H. P. McNeil, and N. Tedla Down-regulation of leucocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor expression in the synovium of rheumatoid arthritis patients after treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Rheumatology, May 1, 2007; 46(5): 742 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shiroishi, K. Kuroki, L. Rasubala, K. Tsumoto, I. Kumagai, E. Kurimoto, K. Kato, D. Kohda, and K. Maenaka Structural basis for recognition of the nonclassical MHC molecule HLA-G by the leukocyte Ig-like receptor B2 (LILRB2/LIR2/ILT4/CD85d) PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16412 - 16417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Di Girolamo, I. Indoh, N. Jackson, D. Wakefield, H. P. McNeil, W. Yan, C. Geczy, J. P. Arm, and N. Tedla Human Mast Cell-Derived Gelatinase B (Matrix Metalloproteinase-9) Is Regulated by Inflammatory Cytokines: Role in Cell Migration J. Immunol., August 15, 2006; 177(4): 2638 - 2650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Wines, H. M. Trist, P. A. Ramsland, and P. M. Hogarth A Common Site of the Fc Receptor {gamma} Subunit Interacts with the Unrelated Immunoreceptors Fc{alpha}RI and Fc{epsilon}RI J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2006; 281(25): 17108 - 17113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kuroki, N. Tsuchiya, M. Shiroishi, L. Rasubala, Y. Yamashita, K. Matsuta, T. Fukazawa, M. Kusaoi, Y. Murakami, M. Takiguchi, et al. Extensive polymorphisms of LILRB1 (ILT2, LIR1) and their association with HLA-DRB1 shared epitope negative rheumatoid arthritis Hum. Mol. Genet., August 15, 2005; 14(16): 2469 - 2480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Sloane, N. Tedla, M. Awoniyi, D. W. MacGlashan Jr, L. Borges, K. F. Austen, and J. P. Arm Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors: novel innate receptors for human basophil activation and inhibition Blood, November 1, 2004; 104(9): 2832 - 2839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shiroishi, K. Tsumoto, K. Amano, Y. Shirakihara, M. Colonna, V. M. Braud, D. S. J. Allan, A. Makadzange, S. Rowland-Jones, B. Willcox, et al. Human inhibitory receptors Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2) and ILT4 compete with CD8 for MHC class I binding and bind preferentially to HLA-G PNAS, July 22, 2003; 100(15): 8856 - 8861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Borges, M. Kubin, and T. Kuhlman LIR9, an immunoglobulin-superfamily-activating receptor, is expressed as a transmembrane and as a secreted molecule Blood, February 15, 2003; 101(4): 1484 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tedla, C. Bandeira-Melo, P. Tassinari, D. E. Sloane, M. Samplaski, D. Cosman, L. Borges, P. F. Weller, and J. P. Arm Activation of human eosinophils through leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor 7 PNAS, February 4, 2003; 100(3): 1174 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |