| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Technical Advances |
From the Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, California
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An alternative that has proven effective, although at significantly lower resolution, is cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), often coupled with image reconstruction (IR) techniques. This approach has yielded excellent images of large animal viruses1 at resolutions ranging from 8 Å upwards. A limitation of this method, however, is that it benefits greatly from high particle symmetry, such as icosahedral symmetry, and is far less powerful for nonsymmetrical macromolecular ensembles.
Both X-ray diffraction and cryo-EM/IR directly provide three-dimensional structural information, and they allow visualization of the interior of the virus as well as its surface. A limitation that some might consider of minor consequence, is that both techniques are averaging techniques. That is, they present a time and space average model of the entire population of particles found in the crystal or on the EM grid. They produce rather little information (although some) regarding the characteristics of the individuals of the population that distinguish them from the average. For this reason, the beautifully symmetrical, and apparently perfect, models of larger viruses derived from X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM may be somewhat deceptive, and not entirely representative of the entire population. Therefore, imaging and interpretation of individual virus particles should always be a part of initial virus characterization.
Another limitation to both X-ray and EM techniques is that preparation of samples can be time-consuming and potentially damaging to the specimens. Especially in the case of X-ray structure determination, the entire cycle of crystallization (if even possible), data collection, and calculations can consume months. Preparation, data collection, and calculations for EM/IR also can take substantial time, albeit generally less. There is a need for a rapid, relatively simple and reasonably inexpensive technique that is still capable of high-resolution imaging.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM)2 has different virtues (and different problems) and it introduces an effective complement to the techniques above.
For applications in pathology, a key benefit is the ability to rapidly examine the architectures of single virus particles or a collection of distinct individuals that originate from a relatively crude preparation. The capability to study individual particles enables us to see variations (such as defects or different reactions to the addition of detergents) within a population of a certain type of virus. The crude preparation that suffices for this makes the whole process relatively easy and fast. Imaging may be performed at a resolution comparable to or slightly lower than conventional EM methods. One important advantage of AFM is that it can be performed into many different environments: in air, vacuum, and most importantly to biological applications, in solution. Usually, this requires no staining, freezing, fixing, labeling, or other preparations. Normally, samples are either dried and imaged in air or imaged in solution, enabling the study of live samples.
This method has already been used for imaging capsid structures of plant viruses in crystals.3,4 With future development of AFM technology, which is now rapid in the area of biological imaging, AFM may maintain pace with conventional EM in resolution. Since its development less than two decades ago, AFM has matured into a easy-to-use, cross-disciplinary and relatively cheap way to study a multitude of samples to a high resolution.
Although AFM produces images only of surfaces, as we show here, that may be sufficient to reveal most of the interior detail. If the native virus particles are subjected to systematic degradation, with enzymes or chemical agents, for example, then layers of structure may be sequentially peeled away to reveal those below. In addition, particles in different states of disrepair reveal a variety of features that can provide a more comprehensive image of broader scope.
The virus that we have chosen to test the capabilities of AFM in molecular pathogenesis is herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1). From a methodological point of view, the most important reason for this is that HSV-1 is a well-studied virus, of which the capsid structure is known to the details, because of EM and especially cryo-EM combined with three-dimensional IR. Furthermore, it is of reasonable large size, enabling to study it in detail by AFM. Also, HSV-1 is an enveloped virus; hence we could test out procedures for its removal. All of these make HSV-1 a perfect measuring stick to judge the capabilities of AFM.
From a pathological point of view, the most important reason we chose Herpes is because it is one of the most widespread human viruses, making it important to study its structure and interaction with cells. Because in our lab we have the ability to infect HSV-1 into cells, this will be the next stage of our HSV-1 studies.
HSV-1 consists of an icosahedral capsid of protein containing the double-stranded DNA genome, and which is itself surrounded by a lipid envelope with embedded proteins. Between the membrane and the capsid are tegument proteins of various sizes. The intact virion is
200 nm in diameter, but from cryo-EM, we know that the capsid shell is
125 nm in diameter and
15-nm thick. The main components of the icosahedral capsid of triangulation number T = 16, as determined by EM, are 12 pentameric capsomeres (pentons) and 150 hexameric capsomeres (hexons). These capsomeres are interconnected by 320 smaller protein complexes known as triplexes.5
Together, these units construct a capsid consisting of 20 equivalent triangles, with pentons on the corners, a row of three hexons between them, and three more hexons in the center of each triangle (Figure 1)
. Pentons (hexons) consist of five (six) copies of the 150-kd VP5 capsid protein,5
and each hexon also contains six copies of 12-kd VP26, forming a ring on top of the VP55.5,6
Each triplex consists of two copies of 33-kd VP23 and one 53-kd VP19 protein.7
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Virus was grown in rabbit skin fibroblasts grown on minimal essential medium with Earles salts (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), supplemented with 292 µg ml-1 glutamine, 100 U of penicillin, 100 µg ml-1 streptomycin, and 5% newborn calf serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Inc., Norcross, GA). For a typical stock of virus, 8 x 107 cells were infected at a multiplicity of 0.01 plaque-forming units/cell of HSV strain 17syn+. After a 1-hour adsorption period, cells were overlain in minimal essential medium with 5% fetal calf serum (Atlanta Biologicals), and incubated at 37°C for 48 hours under 5% CO2.
Partially purified cell-free virus was then prepared as follows. The infected cells were shaken off into media, the suspension centrifuged at 1000 x g for 5 minutes in a Beckman tabletop centrifuge at room temperature. The clarified supernatant was then centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 2.5 hours at 10°C using a Beckman 35 rotor. The resultant pellet was drained thoroughly and resuspended in 350 µl of sterile TE buffer (0.01 mol/L Tris, 0.001 mol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, pH 7.6) at 4°C overnight. The virus suspension was then gently and thoroughly mixed, and stored at -55°C until use. The concentration was
1010 virions/ml.
AFM
The frozen virus suspension was thawed and either first mixed 1:1 with 0.2% Triton X-100 detergent or directly deposited on freshly cleaved mica. After a few minutes, samples were gently rinsed with double-distilled water and quickly dried with a flow of nitrogen gas. Imaging was performed using a Nanoscope IIIa AFM (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA), operated in tapping mode,9,10 and equipped with phase-imaging hardware. Most images presented here are phase images, because they display the greatest amount of contrast and details. A small number of height images are also included to show topological differences. Commercially available tapping mode tips (TESP, RTESP; Digital Instruments), as well as extra oxide-sharpened nanotips (kindly made available by Ami Chand, Digital Instruments) were used.
| AFM Imaging of HSV-1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Before treatment with any agents, the experiments revealed enveloped virions such as that presented in Figure 2A
. In this image, a number of features are visible on the surface of the lipid envelope. The largest of them, some of which are indicated with arrows, have lengths of
25 nm. The envelope of HSV contains several types of viral glycoproteins projecting from the virion envelope. These glycoproteins are essential for virion infectivity and penetration into the host cell. The lengths of spikes formed by different glycoproteins vary in the range of 8 to 24 nm.11
Thus the observed surface features may correspond to the virus-encoded glycoproteins that are incorporated into the virion envelope.
|
Mixing of the virus solution with 0.2% Triton X-100 results in the removal of the lipid envelope from most virions, which then renders the tegument and capsomere structure visible. In Figure 2B
, a capsid that is mostly covered with an irregular coating of particles of various sizes up to 10 nm is seen, whereas on the upper part of the virus capsid, the underlying, highly regular packing of the proteins composing the virus capsid can be recognized as well. It was shown earlier12
that the tegument has a complex nonicosahedrally ordered arrangement and contains at least 18 different viral proteins, the largest of which, VP 1-3, has a predicted size of 336 kd.13
This corresponds well to the observed particles of
10 nm and smaller.
Capsid
More vigorous treatment of virions with detergent results in the complete loss of all envelope and tegument proteins and reveals the icosahedral capsid structure of the virions as seen at relatively low (Figure 2C)
and higher (Figure 2D)
magnification. In Figure 1B
each penton is surrounded by five hexons, whereas each hexon is surrounded by six other capsomeres. Based on the cryo-EM structure of HSV, the pentameric and hexameric capsomeres can be discriminated from one another in AFM images as seen in Figure 2D
, because of their different environments. The distortion in the symmetry of the capsomere packing in the capsid is chiefly because of the attachment of virions to the mica substrate and sample drying, which results in some flattening of the capsids.
In Figure 3A
, a capsid that is stripped of its lipid envelope (white layer) is seen, leaving the capsid fully exposed. In AFM phase images, the lipid envelope contrasts strongly with both capsids and the thin layer of background debris, which consists of small biological particles from within the HSV-1 solution, such as tegument protein, that adheres to the mica surface together with the virions. The reason for this contrast is that the lipid envelope has a different chemical composition, giving it a different interaction with the AFM tip, and thus a distinct phase delay. The simultaneously recorded height image (Figure 3B)
shows that the lipid envelope consists of three different areas, with heights of 2, 6, and 12 nm. Because lipid bilayers have a typical thickness of
6 nm,14
these plateaus could correspond to half, single, and double bilayers, respectively. A higher magnification image of this layer (Figure 3C)
reveals many particles of 4 to 6 nm in size (some of which are denoted by circles), which may well be membrane proteins.
|
4 to 5 nm, which is insufficient to visualize the substructure of capsomeres, but is adequate to discriminate the individual capsomeres. Their diameters of
15 nm are accurately reflected by AFM. However, when Si AFM tips that were additionally oxide sharpened (see Materials and Methods) were used, substructure of individual capsomeres emerged (Figure 4)
|
AFM can probe the structures of large macromolecular assemblies as well as dynamic processes involving the assemblies. Thus, for example, we were able to observe disassembly of viruses as seen in Figure 5
. Investigations of the extrusion of HSV DNA can be important for understanding DNA packing in the capsid shell, and for simulating DNA exit from the capsid in vivo.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The capsids seen in the AFM images do not exhibit the level of perfection implied by the cryo-EM/IR structure, although all are consistent, in a general sense, with that model. The adsorbed virions reveal the range of eccentricities that characterize the individual members of the purified population. Not only does AFM permit us to visualize the aperiodic features of the virions, it shows us the natural variation about the mean structure. When compared to EM single images (Figure 1A)
, the resolution is similar or only slightly lower.
As the virions are degraded, additional features appear. Entire hexameric capsomeres are lost from the capsid surface, apparently as discrete units, and distinct holes remain in the capsids. As the effects of the detergent become more severe, extrusion of double-stranded DNA occurs, and it too can be visualized on the substrate surface.
Obtaining high AFM resolution on very flat crystal surfaces (mica, graphite, silicon, ionic crystals) is not critically dependent on the tip radius, because only a very small part of the tip is in contact with the sample surface, and that part alone determines the resolution. In the case of a surface with greater height variation, such as a virus capsid surface, a larger portion of the tip contacts the sample. Here, overall tip sharpness becomes more important in seeing details such as the capsomere channels and the deeper lying triplexes. Based on recent improvements in the fabrication of ultrasharp tips having a tip radius of
1 nm, as a result of tip sharpening (Nanosensors, Norderfriedrichskoog, Germany: superSharpSilicon Tips; http://www.nanosensors.com/newprod.htm; 2001) and nanotubes,15-17
we expect that AFM resolution will considerably improve in the very near future. This may make AFM resolution comparable to that of conventional EM.
Pathogen diagnosis may depend, in general, on several techniques that agree on different aspects of the pathogen. These include immunological tests, enzyme tests, staining characteristics, cell and tissue morphology, and identification by some means of the infectious agent. It is in this last regard that AFM is particularly relevant to pathology, and the most important point here is that relatively crude cellular or tissue extracts are not essential, nor is purification, with the often attendant artifacts lengthy procedures introduce.
In addition to high-resolution imaging of pathogens themselves, of which we presented some results here, AFM potentially may be used to image immunoreactions. Its high-resolution capacity combined with its capability of imaging in aqueous environments make AFM well suited for this, and will further increase its use in the field of molecular pathogenesis. The same capacities make AFM suitable for the study of cell infection by viruses, which is currently performed in our laboratory.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The procedures and techniques applied here to image single herpesvirus particles are not in any way unique to that system. They can equally well be applied to other viruses.4 With ongoing rapid advances in AFM tip fabrication, increased resolution is expected. These developments, together with AFMs capability of visualizing biological samples in situ, may lead to increased use of AFM in the field of molecular pathology.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant NAG8-1569) and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (grant MI-01-004).
Accepted for publication February 27, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in Am J Pathol:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Kuznetsov, P. D. Gershon, and A. McPherson Atomic Force Microscopy Investigation of Vaccinia Virus Structure J. Virol., August 1, 2008; 82(15): 7551 - 7566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Shahin, W. Hafezi, H. Oberleithner, Y. Ludwig, B. Windoffer, H. Schillers, and J. E. Kuhn The genome of HSV-1 translocates through the nuclear pore as a condensed rod-like structure J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2006; 119(1): 23 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Plomp, T. J. Leighton, K. E. Wheeler, and A. J. Malkin The High-Resolution Architecture and Structural Dynamics of Bacillus Spores Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 603 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. G. Kuznetsov, J. G. Victoria, W. E. Robinson Jr., and A. McPherson Atomic Force Microscopy Investigation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and HIV-Infected Lymphocytes J. Virol., November 15, 2003; 77(22): 11896 - 11909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. R. Chada, E. A. Sanstad, R. Wang, and A. Driks Morphogenesis of Bacillus Spore Surfaces J. Bacteriol., November 1, 2003; 185(21): 6255 - 6261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Malkin, A. McPherson, and P. D. Gershon Structure of Intracellular Mature Vaccinia Virus Visualized by In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy J. Virol., June 1, 2003; 77(11): 6332 - 6340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |