| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |









From the Laboratory of Epithelial Cancer Biology,*the Department of Surgery,
Head and Neck Service, the Department of Medicine,
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, and the Department of Pathology,¶Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; the Laboratory of Cancer Biology,
The Rockefeller University, New York, New York; and the Department of Pediatrics,||Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several CGH studies have suggested that the presence of 3q amplification has biological and clinical significance.2,5,8 The identification of 3q amplification in 25% of dysplasias, in contrast to 75% of invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix, suggests that 3q amplification may be a marker for transition to cancer.2,8 However, the inaccuracy of CGH analysis in precisely defining the amplified region and its limitations in assessing paraffin-embedded tissue have restricted attempts at direct correlation with tumor progression and outcome.
In this study a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) contig spanning the 3q26-27 chromosomal region of amplification in head and neck tumors was constructed. Subsequent fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis enabled the refinement of the amplification region within three overlapping YAC genomic clones of 1 to 2 Mb. These clones were used to develop a two-color FISH assay that detected copy number changes in interphase nuclei on archival tumor tissue from 29 cases of normal mucosa, 20 premalignant mucosa, and 50 invasive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Moreover, high-level amplification of 3q26 was shown to be a significant parameter in both tumor progression and survival. The application of this assay in the detection of gain/amplification in head and neck tumors provides an important tool for prognostication.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Paraffin-embedded samples were randomly selected from available archival tissue resources at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Invasive cancers were derived from previously untreated patients with HNSCC who underwent treatment with curative intent. Noncancerous samples were obtained in two categories: smokers without any cancer history and histologically noncancerous mucosal margins from patients undergoing resection for head and neck cancer. All samples were coded to maintain patient anonymity.
Histological Evaluation
Paraffin-embedded tissue from each case was cut into 5- to 7-µm-thick sections and fixed onto glass slides. Representative sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and categorized as normal mucosa (n = 30)-, premalignant mucosa (dysplasia/in situ carcinoma, n = 30)-, or invasive cancer (n = 50)-based microscopic analysis. Dysplastic mucosa was identified by the presence of cellular atypia, keratosis, and parakeratosis. Carcinoma in situ was defined as atypia of the entire thickness of the epithelium, loss of polarity, and frequent mitosis, but without penetration of the basement membrane. Invasive carcinoma was defined by invasion of the basement membrane. The pathological differentiation of cases of invasive cancer was determined by review of the slides, with the poorest grade used to define differentiation in cases with mixed differentiation. For the purposes of this study, the premalignant group included cases showing either dysplasia or in situ carcinoma, as reliable segregation with sufficient nuclear numbers of these histopathological entities proved difficult after slide treatment for FISH. The presence and location of the target regions were mapped on the slide. Sequential sections were used for FISH analysis to allow identification of target regions.
Generation of Physical Map
YAC clones were identified by screening computerized resources at The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research/MIT Center for Genome Research (www-genome.wi.mit.edu) and the San Antonio Genome Center (http://apollo.utscsa.edu) as described.9 Individual YAC clones were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). YAC clones were mapped to the 3q region and tested for chimerism by FISH on metaphase spreads from normal lymphocytes. The relative position of the YAC clones was accomplished by sequence tagged site (STS) content polymerase chain reaction screening and sequential dual-color FISH analysis as described.9 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to determine the size of the genomic insert according to manufacturers protocol (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA).
FISH
FISH was performed by investigators blinded to the clinical data as described previously.10 To determine the amplification status, 400 individual nuclei were analyzed for each case based on localization in corresponding H&E-stained sections, as described above. The number of analyzed nuclei allows compensation for the issues related to tangential sectioning, as has been detailed elsewhere.11 The presence of amplification was accepted if more than 10% of tumor nuclei displayed increased copy number relative to the chromosome 3 centromeric probe signals and/or tumor ploidy. In cases in which there was a discrepancy between the number of centromeric signals and ploidy, the ploidy number was used to estimate the relative copy number at 3q26.3. Cases with amplification detected were further subdivided into low-level amplification for 3 to 4 copy numbers and high-level amplification for greater than four copy numbers.
Clinical Data
Study data were collected for each case by review of the hospitals and physicians office records by investigators blinded to the origin of the tissue specimens. The clinical and laboratory data were merged based on coding information to avoid bias and maintain patient anonymity. Demographic data (age, gender), tumor data (location, TNM stage), treatment information, and pathological information (tumor grade, margin status, presence of lymph node metastasis, and extracapsular spread) were collected for all cases. Tumor stage was determined by the criteria established by the fifth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.12 The staging information was confirmed by review of tumor maps, operative records, and physicians notes.
Outcome of treatment was evaluated on the date of last patient contact by determining the presence or absence of cancer, and the vital status (alive, dead, or unknown). For patients who died, the cause of death was determined from review of the death certificate, physicians death summary, and/or tumor registry records. The date and location of the first recurrence was also ascertained. Disease-free survival was determined as the differences between time 0 (date of first treatment) and the date of first recurrence. Cause-specific survival was the difference between time 0 and the date of death because of cancer.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study data. Statistical significance was accepted at a two-tailed P value of less than or equal to 0.05. Nonparametric qualitative and quantitative comparisons were performed using Fishers exact test and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, respectively. The chi-square test was used for multigroup, qualitative comparisons. Endpoints of interest were time to first recurrence and time to death as a consequence of cancer. Survival data were censored for patients lost to follow-up, surviving to the end to the study, or dying of causes unrelated to cancer. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier (product-limit) method to allow maximum use of censored observations. Survival comparisons were performed using the generalized Wilcoxon test, a distribution-free method for comparing product limit survival curves. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model, to determine the relative risk between each independent variable and survival.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
38 cM within chromosomal bands 3q26-27. Seventy-three YAC clones were isolated using simple tandem repeat DNA polymorphisms and STSs genetically mapped to chromosomal bands 3q26-27 (Figure 1)
|
3q Copy Number Assessment by FISH Analysis
FISH analysis was successfully completed in 99 of the 110 samples (90%) included in the study. Technical problems and limitations in target cell numbers were the main causes for failure of FISH analysis occurring in one case of normal mucosa and 10 cases of premalignant mucosa. The main reason for failure of FISH analysis related to an inability to analyze the minimal number of nuclei required to validate the copy number changes, which was most pronounced in the premalignant group in which the number of representative nuclei was most restricted. Of the cases successfully analyzed, amplification at 3q was encountered in 1 of 29 cases (3%) of normal mucosa, 5 of 20 dysplasia/carcinoma in situ (25%), and 28 of 50 invasive carcinomas (56%; P < 0.001) (Figure 2)
. Amplification at 3q26.3 exclusively occurred in tissues derived from the peritumoral milieu. Samples from the same patient for each differentiation category were available in 18 cases. Amplification at 3q was found in 1 of 18 (6%) cases of normal mucosa, 5 of 18 (26%) of dysplasia/in situ carcinoma, and 12 of 18 (67%) of invasive cancers (P = 0.04). Incidentally, local recurrences developed in four patients in this group, and all occurred in cases with 3q amplification identified in specimens derived from noncancerous mucosal margins (P = 0.002).
|
The median age of patients with invasive cancer (64 years) and gender distribution (66% males) of the study cohort was representative of that seen in the general patient population with HNSCC. The majority of cases originated in the oral cavity (84%), with all but one of these being oral tongue lesions (Table 1)
. Overall, 27 patients (54%) had early stage (I or II) lesions, with the remaining cases being advanced stage (III or IV) cancers. The pathological differentiation of the tumors were well, moderate, and poor in 8%, 86%, and 6%, respectively. Treatment consisted of surgery alone in 64%, radiation therapy alone in 10%, and surgery with adjuvant radiation in 30% of cases. N1 or N2 nodal metastasis was present in 19 patients (38%), of which 8 (42%) had pathological evidence for extracapsular extension (Table 1)
.
|
The median follow-up for the entire population was 82.5 months. The presence of locoregional recurrence increased with increasing 3q copy number, from 32% for patients with normal copy number, to 72% for low-level amplification, and 90% for high-level amplification (P = 0.003). The number of patients dying of cancer was also correlated with the 3q copy number, increasing from 14 to 44%, to 70%, for normal copy number, low-level amplification, and high-level amplification, respectively (0.006).
The 3-year disease-free and cause-specific survivals negatively correlated with 3q copy number status (Figure 3
; Table 1
). Multivariate analysis including the 3q status, TNM stage, and type of treatment showed that only the presence of high-level amplification at 3q was a significant predictor of disease-free survival (chi-square = 10.15; df = 3; P = 0.02) with a relative risk of 5.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.87 to 13.89; P = 0.001] and low-level amplification had a relative risk of 2.2 (95% CI = 0.87 to 5.55; P = 0.1). Similarly, multivariate analysis revealed only high-level amplification to be a significant predictor of cause-specific survival (chi-square = 10.03; df = 3; P = 0.02) with a relative risk of 7.6 (95% CI = 1.94 to 29.62; P = 0.004), whereas low-level amplification had a relative risk of 3.0 (95% CI = 0.80 to 11.32; P = 0.1).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The advent of CGH has significantly enhanced our ability to genetically screen solid tumors, including head and neck cancers. CGH analysis has identified gain of genetic information at 3q as the most common site of genetic overrepresentation in mucosal squamous cell carcinomas and has suggested it is a pivotal transition event in cancer pathogenesis.2,5,8 However, given the limitations of CGH analysis, specifically the inability to assess individual cells, complementary analytic methods are needed to refine CGH findings. The value of FISH analysis is its ability to assess individual cells for copy number changes, allowing a more targeted approach. In this study we identified three YAC clones that contain the apex of the amplified region at 3q26.3 and can serve as probes for FISH analysis. We confirmed, optimized, and validated our YAC probe for assessing 3q copy number status in paraffin sections and showed significant correlations between the presence of 3q amplification, tumor progression, and clinical outcome.
The detection of 3q amplification in 3% of normal mucosa, 25% of premalignant tissue, and 56% of invasive HNSCCs supports the contention of Heselmeyer and colleagues2 that 3q amplification is a transition event in the progression to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The incidence of 3q amplification in a subset of 18 matched cases of normal mucosa, premalignant tissue, and invasive carcinoma from the same patient were similar to those seen in the overall population. The significantly higher rate of local recurrence in five cases (80%) with 3q amplification in noncancerous tissues from surgical margins lends further support to the role of 3q amplification as a marker of cancer progression. The exact reason for the higher rate of local recurrence is difficult to define, but is similar to the findings of previous studies showing higher rates of local failure in cases with genetic aberrations detected in normal mucosal margins.15 Amplification at 3q26.3 in the primary tumor is also associated with significantly higher rates of tumor recurrence and cancer-related death. In congruence, a negative correlation was observed between the presence of 3q amplification and disease-free and cause-specific survival. Only the presence of high-level 3q amplification remained a significant predictor of outcome when multivariate analysis was used to control for the treatment modality and the TNM stage at presentation. The risk for tumor recurrence was 5.1 times higher and death as a consequence of cancer 7.6 times higher in patients with high-level 3q amplification.
In summary, this study has validated the use of the pooled YAC clones as probes for FISH analysis. The presence of 3q amplification was shown to be an independent predictor of clinical tumor behavior and long-term outcome in patients with head and neck cancer. These data suggest that 3q amplification may represent an important biomarker for the assessment of patients with lesions in the upper aerodigestive tract.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by a Young Investigator Award from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (to B. S.), the Byrne Fund (to B. S.), an American College of Surgeons Faculty Research Fellowship (to B. S.), and the National Cancer Institute (grant CA-05826, to G. B.).
Accepted for publication April 25, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Molinolo, S. M. Hewitt, P. Amornphimoltham, S. Keelawat, S. Rangdaeng, A. Meneses Garcia, A. R. Raimondi, R. Jufe, M. Itoiz, Y. Gao, et al. Dissecting the Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signaling Network: Emerging Results from the Head and Neck Cancer Tissue Array Initiative Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 4964 - 4973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pelosi, B. Del Curto, M. Trubia, A. G. Nicholson, M. Manzotti, G. Veronesi, L. Spaggiari, P. Maisonneuve, F. Pasini, A. Terzi, et al. 3q26 Amplification and Polysomy of Chromosome 3 in Squamous Cell Lesions of the Lung: A Fluorescence In situ Hybridization Study Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 1995 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Sarkaria, P. O-charoenrat, S. G. Talbot, P. G. Reddy, I. Ngai, E. Maghami, K. N. Patel, B. Lee, Y. Yonekawa, M. Dudas, et al. Squamous Cell Carcinoma Related Oncogene/DCUN1D1 Is Highly Conserved and Activated by Amplification in Squamous Cell Carcinomas Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9437 - 9444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Qiu, F. Schonleben, X. Li, D. J. Ho, L. G. Close, S. Manolidis, B. P. Bennett, and G. H. Su PIK3CA Mutations in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1441 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. S. Sarkaria, D. Pham, R. A. Ghossein, S. G. Talbot, M. Hezel, M. E. Dudas, M. I. Ebright, S. Chuai, N. Memoli, E. S. Venkatraman, et al. SCCRO Expression Correlates With Invasive Progression in Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1734 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. B. Wreesmann, W. Shi, H. T. Thaler, A. Poluri, D. H. Kraus, D. Pfister, A. R. Shaha, J. P. Shah, P. H. Rao, and B. Singh Identification of Novel Prognosticators of Outcome in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2004; 22(19): 3965 - 3972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Amornphimoltham, V. Sriuranpong, V. Patel, F. Benavides, C. J. Conti, J. Sauk, E. A. Sausville, A. A. Molinolo, and J. S. Gutkind Persistent Activation of the Akt Pathway in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Potential Target for UCN-01 Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2004; 10(12): 4029 - 4037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Talbot, P. O-charoenrat, I. S. Sarkaria, R. Ghossein, P. Reddy, I. Ngai, C. N. Cordeiro, R. J. Wong, M. G. Kris, V. W. Rusch, et al. Squamous Cell Carcinoma Related Oncogene Regulates Angiogenesis through Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 11(5): 530 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yokoi, K. Yasui, T. Iizasa, I. Imoto, T. Fujisawa, and J. Inazawa TERC Identified as a Probable Target within the 3q26 Amplicon That Is Detected Frequently in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 9(13): 4705 - 4713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Imoto, Y. Yuki, I. Sonoda, T. Ito, Y. Shimada, M. Imamura, and J. Inazawa Identification of ZASC1 Encoding a Kruppel-like Zinc Finger Protein as a Novel Target for 3q26 Amplification in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5691 - 5696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Estilo, P. O-charoenrat, I. Ngai, S. G. Patel, P. G. Reddy, S. Dao, A. R. Shaha, D. H. Kraus, J. O. Boyle, R. J. Wong, et al. The Role of Novel Oncogenes Squamous Cell Carcinoma-related Oncogene and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase p110{alpha} in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2300 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |