| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Animal Model |







From the Center for Comparative Medicine,* University of California, Davis, California; the Laboratory of Genetics and Physiology,
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; the Department of Biochemistry,
School of Dentistry, the University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan; Boston University, School of Medicine,
Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; the Department of Medicine,¶ University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; the Department of Medicine,|| Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; the Division of Life Sciences,** Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California; and the Department of Medical Sciences,
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(casein kinase II
), and the fibroblast growth factors (Fgf) Int2/Fgf3 or keratinocyte growth factor (Kgf/Fgf7) also have the Wnt pathway phenotype. Because the tumors from the ErbB/Ras and the Wnt pathway are so distinct and can be readily identified using routine hematoxylin and eosin sections, we suggest that pathway pathology is applicable in both basic and clinical cancer research.
Since the initial studies, the University of California, Davis Mutant Mouse Pathology Archives have accumulated more than 3000 GEM mammary tumors that now include a sufficient variety of GEM to allow comparisons of tumors within specific signal transduction pathways. We have, therefore, undertaken a systematic study of the morphology of ErbB/Ras pathway tumors as compared with Wnt pathway tumors.
The Wnt1 gene is one of the most commonly induced genes in mice after the insertional activation by MMTV (murine mammary tumor virus).6 The Wnt1 gene was first named "Int1", or MMTV integration site 1, until the activated gene was found to be the homologue of the Drosophila wingless gene.7 The second gene commonly activated by MMTV insertion is known as Int2 but has turned out to be a member of the Fgf family, Fgf3.8 Although members of the Wnt and the Fgf families have been implicated in human cancer, neither has been frequently found in association with human breast cancer. A number of transgenic, mutant, and knockout mice have now been developed that involve the Wnt pathway.9-12 Tumors in these GEM resemble the classical MMTV-induced tumors13 suggesting that activation of the same gene by different mechanisms results in the same type of tumor. The MMTV-induced tumors have characteristic histological patterns that are not generally found in human breast cancer.1
Interestingly, Wnt1 GEM infected with MMTV were found to have insertional activation of Fgf8, Fgf4, and Fgf3 and GEM transgenic for Fgf3 infected with MMTV were found to have activation of Wnt10b, suggesting cooperativity between Fgf and Wnt signaling.6,9,14
On the other hand, tumors arising in ErbB2 GEM have a completely different histopathological pattern that does not resemble the MMTV-induced tumors1
but rather do resemble some human tumors.2
ErbB2 is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family and is amplified in
25% of human breast cancer.15
Neu is an activated rat homologue of ErbB2.16
When either c-ErbB2 or Neu is expressed behind the highly mammary selective MMTV-LTR promotor, a signature solid nodular tumor is generally produced.3,4,17
Although some morphological differences may separate the Ras tumors from the Neu tumors, their phenotypes overlap to a significant degree.2,18
Because polyoma virus middle T (PyV-mT) imitates ErbB2, it is considered a molecular surrogate for ErbB2.19
PyV-mT protein also induces solid tumors.19
We now report that tumors involving other members of these two pathways in GEM share one or more morphological characteristics with the better known members of the Wnt or ErbB/Ras pathways. We describe here the morphological features shared by five members of the Wnt pathway and three cooperating genes as compared to those shared by six members of the ErbB2/Ras family. These studies extend the principle that phenotype predicts genotype to demonstrate that alterations in structure and function induced by genes can also be classified by the signal transduction pathway. Because these mouse mammary tumors have such different and easily identified morphologies, they belong to distinct taxonomic groups that are related to the pathways and we suggest the term "pathway pathology" to indicate the shared morphology within each pathway.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The samples used in this study came from murine tumors that were sent to us as a part of studies of oncogene tumorigenesis in transgenic mice initiated by our collaborators. All transgenes used here were under the control of an MMTV-LTR promotor except the PR- transgenics, created by using a binary system, as described previously.20,21 All transgenic mice were bred in the FVB background strain. In addition, spontaneous Min mutants of the adenomatous polyposis coli (ApcMin) gene in C57/BL/6J and (AKRx C57/BL/6J Min/+) F1 and N2 background were studied. Three of the six ApcMin mice were treated with ethylnitrosourea, a chemical carcinogen.22
The animals were inspected for tumors at least once a week. Animals with tumors were necropsied between 1991 and 2001, and samples of tumors, adjacent mammary gland, and other tissues were fixed in neutral buffered 4% formalin or in Optimal Fix (American Master Tech Scientific, Inc., Lodi, CA), embedded in paraffin, cut into 4-µm sections, and stained with Mayers hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Animal data, gross description, slides, and, in most cases, paraffin blocks were stored at the University of California Davis Mutant Mouse Pathology Laboratory.
Tumors
ErbB/Ras Pathway
Representative mouse mammary tumors (n = 107) transgenic for the ErbB/Ras pathway were selected for this study. The transgenes were ErbB2/Neu,3,23,24
Neu mutants NDL1-4 and NDL2-5,4
as well as transgenic crosses: ErbB2 with ErbB3 (Gillgrass and Muller, McMaster University, unpublished results), or with progesterone receptor
(n = 4) or ß (n = 1) (G Shyamala, University of California, Berkeley, unpublished results). In addition, PyV-mT,19,25,26
and Ras2
tumors were examined.
Wnt Pathway
Tumors (n = 112) with one transgene or mutation activating the Wnt pathway were used. Bitransgenic tumors were not included because of the complexity of phenotypes in the Wnt pathway. The transgenes were Wnt1,12
Wnt10b,10
protein kinase CK2
(formerly casein kinase IIa),11
ß-Catenin,12
dominant-negative mutant of glycogen synthase kinase 3-b (dnGSK3ß) (D. C. Seldin, unpublished results). In addition, ApcMin mutants27
were studied.
Int2 Pathway
Ninety tumors transgenic for Int2/Fgf328,29 or for keratinocyte growth factor (Kgf/Fgf7)30 were studied.
The tumors were initially classified using the taxonomy recommended by the Annapolis Pathology Panel.1 However, the remarkable phenotypes in the Wnt pathway tumors required the development of new taxonomic groups and terms (section results). Images were captured with x10 and x20 objectives using a Carl Zeiss (Thornwood, NY) Axiocam camera and were processed using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Incorporated) software.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
IHC was performed on 35 tumors transgenic for ErbB2, Neu mutants, and PyV-mT, and on 40 tumors transgenic for the Wnt pathway to assess myoepithelial differentiation, further on 5 tumors transgenic for the Wnt pathway to demonstrate ductular architecture, and on skin and 5 mammary pilar tumors to study pilar differentiation. Four-µm paraffin sections were placed onto Superfrost/Plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), deparaffinized, and cleared. IHC was performed after inhibition of endogenous peroxidase activity in a solution of 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in methanol and hydration in graded alcohol to distilled water. Before antibody incubations, antigen retrieval was performed by high temperature (microwave) incubation in 0.01 mol/L of citric acid buffer (pH 6.0) for 3 x 4 minutes. Slides were allowed to cool for 10 minutes in citric acid buffer then transferred to phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) (2 x 5 minutes each). Ten percent normal horse serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was applied to sections and incubated for 20 minutes in a humidified chamber at room temperature.
IHC for smooth muscle actin (SMA) was performed using a 1:1000 diluted mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). IHC for hard (hair) keratin was performed using a 1:20 diluted cell culture supernatant with the mouse monoclonal primary antibody AE-1331 (a kind gift from T.-T. Sun, New York University). The Animal Research Kit (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) with peroxidase was used as amplification system according to the manufacturers instructions.
To exclude SMA-positive myofibroblasts, all 12 questionable SMA-positive ErbB/Ras pathway tumors, two adenomyoepitheliomas, and 5 spindle cell tumors were stained for cytokeratin 14 (CK14). Staining for cytokeratin 8 (CK8) was performed to illustrate the ductular organization of Wnt pathway tumors. We used 1:200 (CK14) and 1:300 (CK8) diluted polyclonal sheep primary antibodies (Binding Site, San Diego, CA). Slides were covered with primary antibody solution and were incubated overnight at room temperature. The Vectastain ABC Elite Kit (Vector Laboratories) was used as amplification system according to the manufacturers instructions. Slides were counterstained in Mayers hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared, and coverslipped. Negative control slides were run without primary antibody. Control slides known to be positive for each antibody were incorporated into each run.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ErbB2 and Ras transgenic mammary tumors have recognizable signature phenotypes as previously described.1
Ras tumors consist of uniform cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and small ovoid nucleus with dense chromatin structure. ErbB2/Neu tumor cells are larger than Ras tumor cells, and have larger nuclei and paler but abundant cytoplasm (Figure 1E)
. ErbB2/Neu transgenic tumors are solid and nodular (Table 1)
. Solid ErbB/Ras pathway tumors (Figure 1, A and E)
have characteristic concentric zones of cell populations: I, one to two peripheral layers of pallisading cells; II, several, more internal layers of larger cells with larger nuclei and more open chromatin structure (vesicular in the ErbB2/Neu tumors); and III, small, tightly packed central cells with smaller, elongated nuclei and less cytoplasm than in the other zones. Some tumors have central necrosis surrounded by bigger tumor cells than the zone III type cells. PyV-mT (Figure 1C)
and Ras transgenic tumors have more variable phenotypes than ErbB2 tumors (Table 1)
. Some solid PyV-mT tumors have minor components of glandular differentiation or cystic spaces. Although ErbB/Ras pathway tumors can have histological types other than solid (Table 1)
, they all contain solid components. With few exceptions, ErbB/Ras pathway tumors share common morphological characteristics.
|
|
|
Wnt Pathway Tumors
Mammary tumors induced by mutations in genes of the canonical Wnt pathway, or of the Wnt pathway interactors CK2a, Int2 (Fgf-3), or Kgf (Fgf-7) (in the following referred to as Wnt pathway tumors) exhibit a variety of morphological patterns. Despite the variety of histological types (Table 2)
, these transgenic tumors have common histological characteristics, which are different from the ErbB/Ras pathway phenotype (Table 3)
. The key features of Wnt pathway tumors are branched ductular architecture (Figure 2, A and B)
, dense stroma with lymphocytic infiltrates (Figure 1, B and D
, and Figure 2, A to D
), and differentiation into acinar (Figure 1D)
, squamous (Figures 1B and 2D)
, and myoepithelial (Figure 1F
and Figure 2, E and F
) components. Each of these characteristics was found in more than 50% of the Wnt pathway tumors studied, and each Wnt pathway tumor had at least one of these characteristics.
|
|
The better-differentiated Wnt tumors have structures resembling elongated, branched ductules. The more peripheral portions of the tumor may have several patterns of terminal differentiation that may be classified according to the predominant pattern. The two types of well-differentiated tumors in this pathway are designated, here, as P-type and pilar tumors.
P-type tumors are characterized by ductules lined by single or multilayered epithelium and surrounded by dense stroma. The basal layer of myoepithelium is maintained (Figure 1F)
. The intraductal cells, especially in the periphery of the tumor, may differentiate into acinar, glandular, and papillary patterns or undergo minimal squamous metaplasia. However, the terminal ends of the ducts may also have masses of undifferentiated cells. Because this type of tumor phenotype has previously been described as "type P tumor" in conjunction with pregnancy-dependent, plaque-like tumors,32
we chose to keep the term.
A second well-differentiated tumor also has caricatures of branched mammary ductules, but squamous metaplasia is present at the blind buds of the ductules, forming keratin-filled neoplastic ductules (abortive hair shafts) embedded in a fibrous stroma (Figures 1B and 2D)
. In most cases, ghost cells (Figures 1B and 2D)
, a typical component of pilomatricomas, are present. Pilar mammary tumors express hair-specific hard keratins as assessed by AE-13 antibody31
(Figure 2D)
. The strong resemblance to hair structures and hair matrix-derived tumors has led us to designate these mammary tumors as "pilar tumors." The ductules of pilar tumors are filled with variable amounts of ghost (shadow) cells and keratin. These lumina are surrounded by basaloid cells (Figure 2D)
and in some cases by an additional layer of myoepithelium. A subset of pilar tumors has been referred to earlier as "molluscoid tumor."13
The periphery of this molluscoid subtype consists of abortive hair shafts. The centers of molluscoid tumors are filled with confluent swirls of laminar keratin (Figure 1B)
. These swirls allow the distinction from other keratin cysts. The swirls suggest that the keratin cysts of a pilar tumor are derived from individual neoplastic ductules that fuse together as they continue to produce keratin.
Pilar tumors are defined as mammary tumors composed of radially arranged hair shaft-like neoplastic ductules, or composed of a keratin cyst containing keratin swirls. In most cases, both components and ghost cells are present. The stroma of pilar tumors often has an intense inflammatory reaction. Pilar tumors may resemble squamous nodules, but they are larger and can metastasize. In other classifications, subsets of pilar tumors were referred to as adenosquamous carcinoma,1
as squamous cell carcinoma1
(the molluscoid subtype), or as intraductal squamous cell carcinoma.33
These categories were not used to describe pilar tumors here because they include tumors other than pilar tumors. In Table 2
, adenosquamous carcinoma1
and squamous cell carcinoma1
refer only to the nonpilar tumors of this category.
The less differentiated tumors found in the Wnt pathway are generally composed of one or more predominant histological patterns such as microacinar (Dunn type A) (Figure 1D)
, solid cords (Dunn type B), glandular, papillary (Figure 2C)
, squamous, or myoepithelial (Figure 2E)
. Tumors primarily composed of myoepithelial cells (Table 2)
include adenomyoepitheliomas and spindle cell tumors (Figure 2E)
and represent 15% of the Wnt pathway tumors. Some papillary tumors had components with pure micropapillary pattern. Some of the less differentiated tumors were adjacent to well-differentiated type P tumors.
The most characteristic histological pattern in the Wnt pathway tumors is squamous differentiation (Table 3)
. Squamous metaplasia may be extensive as in the pilar tumor or may be scattered as in other tumors. In addition, the majority of tumors also have acinar components. However, pure acinar tumors are rare. The majority of Wnt pathway tumors have some myoepithelial differentiation (Table 3)
as confirmed by IHC for SMA (33 of 45 positive, Figures 1E and 2F
) or for CK14 (7 of 7 positive, Figure 2E
). The myoepithelium is either limited to a basal layer as in the better differentiated tumors (Figure 1F)
, or is the predominant population in the myoepithelial tumors (Figure 2E)
. Myoepithelium is also present in some pulmonary emboli and metastases (Figure 2F)
. Many Wnt pathway tumors have pushing tumor margins.
As might be expected from neoplasms with such complex phenotypes, Wnt pathway tumor cells have no one characteristic cytological feature. However, the cytoplasm of Wnt pathway tumor cells appears to be less abundant than in the ErbB/Ras pathway tumors with an inverted nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio. Thirty percent of the tumors had cytoplasmic lipid droplets corresponding to secretion, even though the adjacent mammary gland had involuted.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously described distinctive or signature phenotypes for Erbb2/Neu (Figure 1, A and E)
and Ras transgenic tumors.2
The ErbB2 phenotype has been found to be remarkably consistent in a number of subtypes of the gene.2,24,34
We found here that ErbB2 and Ras tumors share morphological characteristics with the PyV-mT transgenic tumors (Table 3)
. Because PyV-mT acts as a surrogate for activated ErbB2, all three genes are members of the ErbB signaling pathway35
(Figure 3)
. Some investigators have suggested that ErbB2 tumors resemble human lobular carcinoma and originate from lobular hyperplasia.36
Likewise, PyV-mT GEM have mammary glands with normal ducts and abortive lobules.26
Both PyV-mT and ErbB2 tumors completely lack myoepithelium (Table 3
, Figure 1E
). In fact, this myoepithelium is lost when PyV-mT-induced hyperplasia first becomes detectable.26
Most ErbB pathway tumors consist of solid nests and cords. Tumor cell populations are frequently organized in concentric zones (see Results) and, in the predominant zone II, they have large nuclei with an open chromatin structure and abundant but undifferentiated cytoplasm.
|
and two Fgf transgenic models. Our morphological study supports recently published data that CK2 is capable of promoting activation of the Wnt pathway through phosphorylation and stabilization of ß-catenin and disheveled.37
It is an important finding that tumors induced by Kgf and Int2, two members of the Fgf family, have the same phenotype as Wnt pathway tumors, referred to as Wnt pathway phenotype. We hypothesize that these two genes not only cooperate with the Wnt pathway6,9,14
but may also activate this pathway. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that MMTV infection activates Fgf family members in Wnt GEM, and activates Wnt family members in Fgf GEM.9,14
Several features were identified that were characteristic for the Wnt pathway tumors, and were rarely, if ever, observed in the ErbB/Ras pathway tumors (Table 3
; Figure 1, A to E
). These include 1) branched ductal architecture; 2) differentiation into squamous, acinar or glandular, solid, and/or myoepithelial components; and 3) well-developed stroma and host response. Because these patterns have not been emphasized or grouped in previous publications, they are discussed in more detail below.
Branched Ductal Architecture
The characteristic feature of well-differentiated Wnt pathway tumors is the organization of the tissue around irregularly branched, elongated ductules. Since this phenomenon has previously been described,13
we used the old term "type P tumor" (see Results and Figure 1F
and Figure 2, A and B
). However, the branching morphogenesis could also be identified in association with less differentiated tumors with predominant glandular, papillary, or pilar differentiation. The fact that some poorly differentiated tumors were in direct continuity with well-differentiated tumors suggests that the less differentiated tumors arose from subpopulations of cells within the originating tumor.
The Wnt pathway is critical for tissue and organ differentiation.38 Different components influence cell fate decisions. The ductal dysmorphogenesis that seems to be so characteristic of the Wnt pathway tumors is in contrast to the lobular dysmorphogenesis observed in the ErbB pathway. However, the reader is to be reminded that the classical consequence of MMTV infection is the hyperplastic alveolar nodule, which is clearly the result of lobulo-alveolar differentiation. In our experience, the MMTV-induced hyperplastic alveolar nodule is associated with Wnt1 activation whereas the type P tumor is primarily associated with Int-2.39
Terminal Differentiation
The aberrant ductules described above terminate in masses of cells that appear to differentiate along several different pathways. As suggested, the same tumor may have foci that have differentiated along different pathways.
Squamous metaplasia and keratinization was found in, but not limited to, pilar tumors (see Results). The frequent presence of squamous metaplasia in the transgenic Wnt pathway tumors may be related to the dysregulation of ß-Catenin40
(Figure 3)
. The spontaneous mouse mammary tumors, that are primarily associated with Wnt1 activation,39
seldom have squamous metaplasia.13
As observed here, ErbB/Ras pathway tumors rarely have squamous metaplasia. Squamous differentiation was less frequent in Wnt1 and Wnt10b GEM than in GEM with mutations in genes downstream from Wnt (Table 2
and Figure 3
). It is possible that the Wnt glycoproteins activate noncanonical pathways41
that promote acinar or glandular differentiation and prevent keratinization.
Pilar tumors (see Results and Figure 1B
), a distinct histological type with squamous differentiation, represent the most common histological type in the Wnt pathway tumors (Table 3)
. Pilar tumors may have ghost cells (Figures 1B and 2D)
, neoplastic ductules resembling abortive hair shafts, or squamous cysts that appear to be derived from confluent ductules (Figure 2B)
characterized by swirls of laminar keratin on the cross-section. Pilar tumors are an unusual phenotype for the mammary gland, but closely resemble trichoepitheliomas or pilomatricomas, skin or hair matrix-derived tumors (Figure 2, C and D)
.
Accumulation of ß-Catenin induces de novo hair morphogenesis and trichoepitheliomas in the skin.42-44
In the mammary gland, a skin appendix, the Wnt/ß-Catenin pathway promotes both epidermal transdifferentiation71
and hair-specific features (Table 2
, Figures 1B and 2D
).
All mammary tumors in mice bearing a mutation of the ApcMin gene were pilar (Table 2)
. Mammary and intestinal tumors in ApcMin mice were extensively studied in various backgrounds regarding spontaneous and chemical carcinogenesis.22
Treatment with chemical carcinogens in mice frequently induces squamous mammary tumors. However, the pilar phenotype was also observed in spontaneous ApcMin tumors and in various backgrounds. Interestingly, chemically induced adenocarcinomas with squamous metaplasia in nontransgenic mice have Ras mutations in 20%.45,46
However, the six Ras transgenic tumors included in our study had no keratinization.
Squamous metaplasia of the lactiferous ducts, in humans, is related to smoking (just another chemical carcinogen), and is often associated with periductal inflammatory infiltrates47
and with inflammatory pseudocapsules ofsilicon prosthesis implants.48
We observed a similar association of inflammatory infiltrates and squamous metaplasia in the murine Wnt pathway tumors (Table 3
and Figure 1B
). Squamous metaplasia is also found in 4% of human breast carcinomas.48
Microacinar and glandular differentiation and secretory activity were frequent in the Wnt pathway tumors (Tables 2 and 3
; Figure 1, D and F
; and Figure 2, B and F
). Although only a few tumors were pure classical MMTV-induced microacinar type A tumors as described by Dunn, minor microacinar components were characteristic for many Wnt pathway tumors. This supports the concept of pathway pathology (Table 3
, Figure 1D
). Although some ErbB/Ras pathway tumors are papillary, they rarely have significant glandular differentiation.
Solid cords of cells with peripheral palisades of SMA-positive cells are characteristic of the classical type B tumor.13
Solid tumors are rare in transgenic Wnt pathway tumors (Table 2)
. However, the ends of some of the terminal ducts contain solid masses of undifferentiated cells that do not express the epithelial marker CK8.
Myoepithelial differentiation is also characteristic of Wnt pathway tumors (Figure 1F
; Figure 2, E and F
; Table 3
). In contrast, the loss of myoepithelium marks PyV-mT and ErbB2 atypia and neoplasia26
and most human breast cancers.49,50
The presence of myoepithelium in the Wnt pathway tumors may be significant in that the myoepithelium is considered a natural tumor suppressor.51,52
The myoepithelium appears as a distinctive basal layer in many Wnt pathway tumors. However, the Wnt pathway induced spindle cell tumors also proved to be myoepithelial (Figure 2E
and Table 2
). Because spindle cell tumors are concentrated in the Kgf, CK2a, and dnGSK3b genotypes, this variation of phenotype may be because of additional pathways activated by these genes (Figure 3)
.
Stroma
In contrast to the ErbB/Ras pathway tumors, the stroma of most Wnt pathway tumors was well developed and contained inflammatory infiltrates, predominantly lymphocytes (Table 3
; Figure 1, B and F
; Figure 2, A to D
). The host-tumor interface had a pushing margin in many Wnt pathway tumors (Figure 1F)
in contrast to the more invasive growth of the ErbB/Ras pathway tumors (Figure 1C)
.3,25
Two target genes activated by both pathways are frequently amplified in human breast cancer: myc and cyclin D1 (Figure 3)
. The dependence of Wnt- and ErbB2-induced tumorigenesis on cyclin D1 has recently been documented by Yu and co-workers.53
The phenotype of tumors induced by these target genes will be discussed elsewhere (A. Rosner, R. D. Cardiff, and J. P. Gregg, unpublished data).
Conclusions
We compared the histology of ErbB/Ras and Wnt pathway transgenic mammary tumors. Wnt pathway tumors frequently show combinations of acinar, glandular, myoepithelial, or pilar differentiation. Despite the complexity of differentiation patterns in the Wnt pathway tumors, the morphological criteria given in Table 3
distinguish Wnt pathway tumors from ErbB/Ras pathway tumors. We should emphasize that the lesions described here are only signature lesions that are closely related to the genotype. As is recorded in the tables presented here and elsewhere, any given GEM genotype can give rise to a range of tumor phenotypes. However, the tumors described here are so characteristic of the pathway that, when identified in histological sections, they are pathognomonic of the pathway and, thus, should be placed in a separate part of the taxonomic nomenclature related to the pathway. Hence, pathway pathology should result in a specific taxonomic category for mouse tumors.
Pathway pathology should have applications in both basic and clinical research. Histomorphological criteria can help to identify unexpected activated signaling pathways in transgenic tumors. For example, the relationship between the morphology of Fgf and Wnt pathway tumors implies the utilization of the same molecular processes. Our studies also suggest that a subset of keratinizing or myoepithelial human breast tumors might have activation of the Wnt pathway.
In human disease, the diagnosis of the oncogenic genetic aberrations is increasingly important for predicting prognostic and therapeutic strategies. Overexpression of ErbB2 is a well-established example of molecular profiling. The subgroup of breast cancer patients with tumors expressing ErbB2 benefits from treatment with a humanized anti-Her2/Neu monoclonal antibody (Herceptin).55,56 The need for genetic profiling is growing because of the rapid development of strategies based on gene therapy.57-59
Studies in human breast cancer, based on standard histological classifications, have found several correlations between the tumor phenotype and genotype. Ductal carcinoma in situ often has an amplification or overexpression of ErbB2.15 Mutations of the BRCA1 gene are especially frequent in medullary carcinoma.60,61 Lobular carcinomas are associated with deletion of E-cadherin.62
Our research now suggests that these concepts need to be expanded to include entire pathways. The correlations should become even stronger as additional criteria are recognized and as pathways and phenotypes are compared with gene expression signatures. Furthermore, as targeted molecular therapeutics become more widely available in the future, these correlations will have increasing clinical importance.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
Note Added in Proof
Since the submission of this paper, an article has appeared that documents hierarchical clustering of tumor types at the level of gene expression. (Desai KV, Xiao N, Wang W, Gangi L, Greene J, Powell JI, Dickson R, Furth P, Hunter K, Kucherlapati R, Simon R, Liu ET, Green JE. Initiating oncogenic event determines gene-expression patterns of human breast cancer models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002 99:69676972.)
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by the German Academic Exchange Service (to A. R.), the State of California Breast Cancer Research Program (grant 5JB-0014 to R. D. C.), the National Institutes of Health (CA64843 to A. R. M. and CA81376 to C. M. and R. D. C.), the National Center for Research Resources (U42 RR14905 to R. D. C.), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES11624 to D. C. S.), the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Breast Cancer Research Grant Program (to E. L.-B.), the National Cancer Institute (CA665401 to G. S.), the Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative (to A. E. G.), and the Clayton Foundation (C.M. is a Clayton Foundation Investigator).
Current address of X. X.: McLaughlin Research Institute, Great Falls, MT.
Accepted for publication May 23, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in Am J Pathol:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Cadieux, V. Kedinger, L. Yao, C. Vadnais, M. Drossos, M. Paquet, and A. Nepveu Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus p75 and p110 CUX1 Transgenic Mice Develop Mammary Tumors of Various Histologic Types Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 69(18): 7188 - 7197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Ponzo, R. Lesurf, S. Petkiewicz, F. P. O'Malley, D. Pinnaduwage, I. L. Andrulis, S. B. Bull, N. Chughtai, D. Zuo, M. Souleimanova, et al. Met induces mammary tumors with diverse histologies and is associated with poor outcome and human basal breast cancer PNAS, August 4, 2009; 106(31): 12903 - 12908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Glover, K. E. Gurley, K.-H. Kim, B. Storer, M. L. Fero, and C. J. Kemp Endocrine dysfunction in p27Kip1 deficient mice and susceptibility to Wnt-1 driven breast cancer Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2009; 30(6): 1058 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dourdin, B. Schade, R. Lesurf, M. Hallett, R. J. Munn, R. D. Cardiff, and W. J. Muller Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue Deleted on Chromosome 10 Deficiency Accelerates Tumor Induction in a Mouse Model of ErbB-2 Mammary Tumorigenesis Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2122 - 2131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Chikama, C.-Y. Liu, J. T.A. Meij, Y. Hayashi, I-J. Wang, L. Yang, T. Nishida, and W. W.Y. Kao Excess FGF-7 in Corneal Epithelium Causes Corneal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Young Mice and Epithelium Hyperplasia in Adult Mice Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2008; 172(3): 638 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Trimboli, K. Fukino, A. de Bruin, G. Wei, L. Shen, S. M. Tanner, N. Creasap, T. J. Rosol, M. L. Robinson, C. Eng, et al. Direct Evidence for Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Breast Cancer Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 68(3): 937 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Gupta, J. Perk, S. Acharyya, P. de Candia, V. Mittal, K. Todorova-Manova, W. L. Gerald, E. Brogi, R. Benezra, and J. Massague ID genes mediate tumor reinitiation during breast cancer lung metastasis PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19506 - 19511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Cao, J.-l. Luo, and M. Karin I{kappa}B kinase {alpha} kinase activity is required for self-renewal of ErbB2/Her2-transformed mammary tumor-initiating cells PNAS, October 2, 2007; 104(40): 15852 - 15857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Akli, C. S. Van Pelt, T. Bui, A. S. Multani, S. Chang, D. Johnson, S. Tucker, and K. Keyomarsi Overexpression of the Low Molecular Weight Cyclin E in Transgenic Mice Induces Metastatic Mammary Carcinomas through the Disruption of the ARF-p53 Pathway Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7212 - 7222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kuorelahti, S. Rulli, I. Huhtaniemi, and M. Poutanen Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Up-Regulates wnt5b and wnt7b in the Mammary Gland, and hCG{beta} Transgenic Female Mice Present with Mammary Gland Tumors Exhibiting Characteristics of the Wnt/{beta}-Catenin Pathway Activation Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3694 - 3703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Gestl, T. L. Leonard, J. L. Biddle, M. T. Debies, and E. J. Gunther Dormant Wnt-Initiated Mammary Cancer Can Participate in Reconstituting Functional Mammary Glands Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 195 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Dearth, X. Cui, H.-J. Kim, I. Kuiatse, N. A. Lawrence, X. Zhang, J. Divisova, O. L. Britton, S. Mohsin, D. C. Allred, et al. Mammary Tumorigenesis and Metastasis Caused by Overexpression of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 (IRS-1) or IRS-2 Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2006; 26(24): 9302 - 9314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Zinser, M. A. Leonis, K. Toney, P. Pathrose, M. Thobe, S. A. Kader, B. E. Peace, S. R. Beauman, M. H. Collins, and S. E. Waltz Mammary-Specific Ron Receptor Overexpression Induces Highly Metastatic Mammary Tumors Associated with {beta}-Catenin Activation Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11967 - 11974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Du, K. Podsypanina, S. Huang, A. McGrath, M. J. Toneff, E. Bogoslovskaia, X. Zhang, R. C. Moraes, M. Fluck, D. C. Allred, et al. Introduction of oncogenes into mammary glands in vivo with an avian retroviral vector initiates and promotes carcinogenesis in mouse models PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17396 - 17401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Namba, L. J.T. Young, C. K. Abbey, L. Kim, P. Damonte, A. D. Borowsky, J. Qi, C. G. Tepper, C. L. MacLeod, R. D. Cardiff, et al. Rapamycin Inhibits Growth of Premalignant and Malignant Mammary Lesions in a Mouse Model of Ductal Carcinoma In situ Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2006; 12(8): 2613 - 2621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Kwak, S. Kim, J. Zhang, R. D. Cardiff, E. V. Schmidt, and D. A. Haber Mammary Tumorigenesis following Transgenic Expression of a Dominant Negative CHK2 Mutant Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 1923 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cecena, F. Wen, R. D. Cardiff, and R. G. Oshima Differential Sensitivity of Mouse Epithelial Tissues to the Polyomavirus Middle T Oncogene Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2006; 168(1): 310 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Currier, S. E. Solomon, E. G. Demicco, D. L. F. Chang, M. Farago, H. Ying, I. Dominguez, G. E. Sonenshein, R. D. Cardiff, Z.-X. J. Xiao, et al. Oncogenic Signaling Pathways Activated in DMBA-Induced Mouse Mammary Tumors Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2005; 33(6): 726 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bascom, J. E. Fata, Y. Hirai, M. D. Sternlicht, and M. J. Bissell Epimorphin Overexpression in the Mouse Mammary Gland Promotes Alveolar Hyperplasia and Mammary Adenocarcinoma Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 65(19): 8617 - 8621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhao, Y. Cui, J. Dupont, H. Sun, L. Hennighausen, and S. Yakar Overexpression of the Tumor Suppressor Gene Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue Partially Inhibits Wnt-1-Induced Mammary Tumorigenesis Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6864 - 6873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sun, L. Strizzi, A. Raafat, M. Hirota, C. Bianco, L. Feigenbaum, N. Kenney, C. Wechselberger, R. Callahan, and D. S. Salomon Overexpression of Human Cripto-1 in Transgenic Mice Delays Mammary Gland Development and Differentiation and Induces Mammary Tumorigenesis Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2005; 167(2): 585 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Farago, I. Dominguez, E. Landesman-Bollag, X. Xu, A. Rosner, R. D. Cardiff, and D. C. Seldin Kinase-Inactive Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3{beta} Promotes Wnt Signaling and Mammary Tumorigenesis Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 65(13): 5792 - 5801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Arnes, J.-S. Brunet, I. Stefansson, L. R. Begin, N. Wong, P. O. Chappuis, L. A. Akslen, and W. D. Foulkes Placental Cadherin and the Basal Epithelial Phenotype of BRCA1-Related Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4003 - 4011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Santos, D. Eggle, and David. J. States Wnt pathway curation using automated natural language processing: combining statistical methods with partial and full parse for knowledge extraction Bioinformatics, April 15, 2005; 21(8): 1653 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Zinser and J. Welsh Vitamin D receptor status alters mammary gland morphology and tumorigenesis in MMTV-neu mice Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2004; 25(12): 2361 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Lacroix, R-A Toillon, and G Leclercq Stable 'portrait' of breast tumors during progression: data from biology, pathology and genetics Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 497 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gattelli, M. C. Cirio, A. Quaglino, C. Schere-Levy, N. Martinez, M. Binaghi, R. P. Meiss, L. H. Castilla, and E. C. Kordon Progression of Pregnancy-Dependent Mouse Mammary Tumors after Long Dormancy Periods. Involvement of Wnt Pathway Activation Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 64(15): 5193 - 5199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Namba, J. E. Maglione, L. J.T. Young, A. D. Borowsky, R. D. Cardiff, C. L. MacLeod, and J. P. Gregg Molecular Characterization of the Transition to Malignancy in a Genetically Engineered Mouse-Based Model of Ductal Carcinoma In situ Mol. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 2(8): 453 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Y. Liu, S. P. McDermott, S. S. Khwaja, and C. M. Alexander The transforming activity of Wnt effectors correlates with their ability to induce the accumulation of mammary progenitor cells PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4158 - 4163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Cardiff, A. Rosner, M. A. Hogarth, J. J. Galvez, A. D. Borowsky, and J. P. Gregg Validation: The New Challenge for Pathology Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1_suppl): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C.L. Schuh Trials, Tribulations, and Trends in Tumor Modeling in Mice Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1_suppl): 53 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Li, B. Welm, K. Podsypanina, S. Huang, M. Chamorro, X. Zhang, T. Rowlands, M. Egeblad, P. Cowin, Z. Werb, et al. Evidence that transgenes encoding components of the Wnt signaling pathway preferentially induce mammary cancers from progenitor cells PNAS, December 23, 2003; 100(26): 15853 - 15858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Romieu-Mourez, D. W. Kim, S. M. Shin, E. G. Demicco, E. Landesman-Bollag, D. C. Seldin, R. D. Cardiff, and G. E. Sonenshein Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus c-rel Transgenic Mice Develop Mammary Tumors Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2003; 23(16): 5738 - 5754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Andrechek, M. A. Laing, A. A. Girgis-Gabardo, P. M. Siegel, R. D. Cardiff, and W. J. Muller Gene Expression Profiling of Neu-induced Mammary Tumors from Transgenic Mice Reveals Genetic and Morphological Similarities to ErbB2-expressing Human Breast Cancers Cancer Res., August 15, 2003; 63(16): 4920 - 4926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Chatterjee, A. Rosner, Y. Han, E. T. Zelazny, B. Li, R. D. Cardiff, and A. S. Perkins Acceleration of Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus-Induced Murine Mammary Tumorigenesis by a p53172H Transgene: Influence of FVB Background on Tumor Latency and Identification of Novel Sites of Proviral Insertion Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2002; 161(6): 2241 - 2253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |