| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communication |





From the Department of Morphology and Embryology, Section of Histology and Embryology,* the Department of Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, Section of Pathology,
the Chair of Maxillo-Facial Surgery,
Head E.N.T. Clinic,
the School of Medicine, and the Center of Biotechnology,¶ University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In recent years, it has been shown that PA is a genetically heterogeneous neoplasm characterized by different chromosome aberrations, translocations, and gene mutations.5 Different PA subgroups have been identified, with anomalies mainly involving the chromosomes 3, 8, 9, and 12.6 Related to the chromosome aberrations, deregulations of specific genes have been detected, such as PLAG1 gene encoding a zinc finger protein related to the control of IGF II expression.7 It should be noted that approximately 30% of PA does not show chromosome alterations.8 Little is known about the causes of PA onset/progression, chromosome aberrations, and gene mutations detected in this tumor. Simian virus 40 (SV40), a highly oncogenic DNA tumor virus, was recently found associated with different human tumors, namely brain and bone tumors, malignant pleural mesotheliomas, thyroid carcinomas, pituitary adenomas, and different lymphoproliferative disorders.9-11 SV40 is a monkey virus, which was believed to be transmitted to humans only under exceptional situations in natural infection.9 SV40 contaminated vaccines, in particular anti-polio vaccines between 1955 and 1963, were administered to millions of humans worldwide.9-11 However, the presence of this viral agent in humans, before the introduction of SV40-contaminated vaccines, cannot be discarded.12 Follow-up of individuals administered with SV40-contaminated vaccines did not show an apparent increase of tumors rate.13 However, it was reported that among the follow up group a 15-year-old girl developed a PA of the salivary gland.13 In animal models, the SV40 Tag oncoprotein expression in the submandibular gland of SV40-transgenic mice induces cell transformation and extensive ductal hyperplasia,14 whereas transgenic mice with the Tag oncoprotein expressed under the control of the submandibular gland secretory protein "b" develop adenocarcinomas of duct origin.15 Although the histotype of these murine tumors differs from the human PA, it is possible that SV40 exerts its oncogenic potential in different oral glands.
Altogether these data prompted us to investigate whether SV40 Tag sequences and Tag expression could be detected in human PA. To this purpose, SV40 Tag amino (N)-terminal coding sequences were investigated in PA of salivary gland specimens by PCR followed by filter hybridization with a specific internal oligoprobe. Then, PCR products were DNA sequenced to further assess the SV40 specificity. The presence of the Tag oncoprotein in PA samples was determined by immunohistochemistry with the specific monoclonal antibody (mab) Pab10116 which recognizes a Tag carboxyl(C)-terminal epitope, using a very sensitive technical approach that allowed the retrieval of the viral nuclear phosphoprotein.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Forty-five PA of the parotid gland from tumor patients and 11 normal tissues of the salivary gland from patients affected by neoplasms of the neck area, which differ from PA, were obtained from the ENT Clinic, University of Ferrara. Samples were classified according to Seiferts histological subtypes (Table 1)
.17
Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin, dehydrated and paraffin-embedded at the Section of Pathology, University of Ferrara. All specimens under analysis had never been investigated before for SV40. Tissue samples were treated with 1% SDS and 500 µg/ml proteinase K. DNA was extracted with a mixture of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and dialyzed for 24 hours with TEN buffer (10 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mol/L NaCl) and for a further 24-hour period with TE buffer, which is identical to TEN buffer but without NaCl. To verify whether cross-contaminations occurred during DNA extraction procedure, each sample was purified simultaneously with a specimen of salmon sperm DNA and a mock sample lacking DNA, and then all samples were subjected to PCR analysis.16,18
|
DNA extracted from human specimens was first assessed for suitability to PCR analysis by a control reaction designed to amplify ß-globin gene sequences, as described before.16 Then, DNA samples were investigated for SV40 Tag N-terminal coding sequences. To confirm the reproducibility of PCR assays and to avoid possible contaminations, DNAs were extracted with the procedure recommended for PCR investigation in a laboratory equipped with PCR facilities. To verify whether cross-contaminations occurred during the DNA extraction procedure, each sample was purified simultaneously with a specimen of salmon sperm DNA and a mock specimen lacking DNA, and then subjected to PCR analysis. The distinct phases of PCR procedures were performed in separate rooms by different operators at the Section of Histology and Embryology, and Center of Biotechnology (BL3/P3 laboratories), University of Ferrara. SV40 DNA wild-type (wt) strains VA 4554 A110 (our laboratory) and 77619 (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) were used as control in PCR amplification and sequence analysis. DNA samples were analyzed in triplicate by three different operators in a blind fashion. The results obtained by the three different operators did not show discrepancy. SV40 Tag N-terminal sequences were investigated by semi-nested PCR (snPCR)18 using the primer sets SV.for2-SV.rev and SV.for2-PYV.rev,20 yielding amplification products of 575 bp and 543 bp, respectively.18 These primers allow amplification of an N-terminal Tag coding sequence, which contains the pRb pocket binding domain and the Tag intron.18,20 The SV40 specificity of PCR amplified products was assessed by filter hybridization with the internal SV oligoprobe.18,20
DNA (0.5 µg) was PCR amplified in a total volume of 50 µl containing 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, 2.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin, 150 µmol/L of each dNTP and 25 µmol/L of each primer, 1 unit of Taq-DNA polymerase (Roche, Milan, Italy), together with 1 unit of platinum Taq antibody as indicated by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy). By adding the Taq antibody, the Taq polymerase activity was blocked up to 94°C, thus avoiding the generation of nonspecific amplification products at room and ramping temperatures. PCR products were migrated in a 1% agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). DNA was cross-linked to filters by UV irradiation for 2 minutes. All filters were hybridized with the SV oligoprobe which is specific for the SV40 Tag sequences analyzed. The SV oligoprobe was previously 3'-end labeled with a tail of dUTP-fluorescein by terminal transferase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Detection of the fluorescent DNA hybrid was carried out with anti-fluorescein horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody, as indicated by the supplier (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The film exposure was at room temperature for 15 minutes to 1 hour. Filter hybridization with the specific SV oligoprobe was used to prove the SV40 specificity of the amplified sequences.18
DNA Sequencing
To further confirm the SV40 specificity of the amplified sequences, PCR products, 40 µl each, were purified from agarose gel by using a Gel Extraction Kit (QIAquick, Qiagen, Germany) and then directly sequenced by Sangers technique,21,22 or by an automatic DNA sequence apparatus (ABI Prism 377).
Immunohistochemistry
Thin sections, 5 µm each, were deparaffinized in xylol and rehydrated with ethanol solutions. To retrieve the SV40 Tag, a nuclear phosphoprotein which binds the products of the tumor suppressor genes p53 and pRb family, and co-activator products p300 and p400, thin sections were treated in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 10.0, for 20 minutes in a microwave oven at 600 W. Then, specimens were incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes in 3% H2O2 in PBS to block endogenous peroxidase. Slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with the mouse anti-SV40 Tag monoclonal antibody Pab 101 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and with biotinylated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (CytoScan HRP Detection System, Cell Marque, Hot Springs, AR). Tissue sections of PA and normal tissues from parotid glands were developed with standard routine streptavidin-biotin immunohistochemical methods and counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin. SV40-transformed human fibroblasts, WI 3813A, expressing SV40 Tag and normal human fibroblasts, WI 38, purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), were pelleted, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, processed as tissues, and then used as SV40-positive and SV40-negative controls in each experiment.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, human PA of salivary gland specimens and normal salivary gland tissues used as control were analyzed by snPCR for SV40 Tag coding sequences, followed by filter hybridization with the SV internal specific oligoprobe (Table 1)
. DNA samples were analyzed for the conserved SV40 Tag N-terminal coding sequences by oligonucleotide pairs which efficiently amplify these sequences.14,18,20
The sensitivity and specificity of our snPCR approach followed by filter hybridization were described before.18
Briefly, in reconstruction experiments with serial dilution of high-purified SV40 DNA, from 100 ng to 1 ag, in a background of 500 ng of genomic DNA from human placenta, the N-terminal Tag coding sequences of 543 bp, amplified by snPCR, was detected in gel stained by ethidium bromide till 10 fg, whereas these SV40 sequences were detected till 10 ag by filter hybridization with the SV probe (data not shown).
The prevalence of SV40 Tag N-terminal region in primary PA samples was 28/45 (62%), whereas 11 normal salivary gland tissue samples were all negative (Table 1
; Figure 1
). These data indicate that, under our DNA extraction and PCR conditions, human PA of salivary gland specimens carry at high prevalence DNA sequences coding for SV40 Tag oncoprotein.
|
To confirm the specificity of SV40 footprints detected in human PA, all PCR products were subjected to DNA sequence analysis. All SV40 PCR amplified products, ie, the Tag N-terminal region of 543 bp, were sequenced.18 DNA sequence analysis showed that the viral sequence of our samples was not distinguishable from the SV40 wt 776 strain (data not shown). These data are in agreement with the results obtained by several investigators who detected SV40 776 sequences in different human samples.11,18 This result does not seem to be a consequence of laboratory contamination, because we used as control two SV40 strains, 776 and VA 4554-A1 (GenBank accession numbers AF3161397 and AF15619 for strain 776 and VA 4554-A1, respectively). Indeed, none of the viral fragments amplified by snPCR from specimens under analysis exhibited the DNA sequences of the SV40 strain VA 4554-A1.
Immunohistochemistry Analysis of the Tag Oncoprotein
Immunohistochemical staining of routine histological sections by the PAP technique resulted in a dark brown reaction product in antigen-containing cells, whereas the background appeared pale blue owing to the counterstain. The SV40 Tag transformed human fibroblasts WI 38 13A, which represent the positive control, were immunoreactive, whereas the normal human fibroblasts WI 38, the negative control, were all negative (Figure 2, A and B)
. Nuclear staining was found in 26 of 28 (93%) of PA tissue specimens previously found SV40-positive by PCR. The most consistent morphological sign of the virus footprint was a bright finely granular nuclear staining either in the epithelial component or in the stromal component. SV40 Tag oncoprotein was detected as a fine particulate or dense homogeneous pattern into the nucleus. SV40 Tag protein was detected in the solid, trabecular, tubular, or cystic structures consisting of epithelial cells of varying differentiation both of the tumor and normal cells near the PA sample (Figure 2, DF)
. In addition, SV40 Tag was found in the mucoid, chondroid or mixed mucoid-chondroid stromal areas. No nuclear signal for SV40 Tag was revealed in acinar cells, in endothelial and myoepithelial cells of the normal parotid gland (Figure 2C)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our study, carried out by PCR and filter hybridization, SV40 Tag coding sequences were detected with high prevalence in human PA, but not in normal salivary gland tissues. The use of this sensitive technique disclosed the presence of SV40 sequences in human PA. DNA sequence analysis indicated that SV40 sequences, amplified by PCR, belong to SV40 wild-type and not to other simian, human or recombinant polyomaviruses. These results indicate that PA is the seventh human tumor type found SV40-positive. Indeed, in previous reports brain and bone tumors, pleural malignant mesotheliomas, thyroid carcinomas, pituitary adenomas and different lymphoproliferative disorders were found SV40-positive.11 SV40 Tag analyzed by immunohistochemistry revealed that 93% of the samples, found SV40-positive by PCR, expressed the Tag oncoprotein. It is of interest to note that in PA samples which stain positive for SV40 Tag, the viral oncoprotein was detected only in cells of epithelial origin. In PA samples SV40 Tag was also detected, by immunohistochemistry, in normal cells near the tumor. It is possible that the viral infection may spread from transformed cells to normal cells surrounding the tumor.
The results of this investigation suggest that SV40 may play a role in the onset/progression of the PA, which is a benign neoplasm. It is also possible that PA transformed cells represent an occasional milieu for SV40, while the corresponding normal tissue does not allow SV40 multiplication. However, the detection of the Tag viral oncoprotein expression suggests that SV40 is not a passenger virus. Indeed, with its Tag oncoprotein SV40 may exert its tumorigenic potential in PA tissues. Since previous studies reported SV40 sequences in PBMC of tumor patients23 and in PBMC of normal individuals,16,18,23 it is possible that leukocytes may transfer SV40 DNA to different tissues of the host, where SV40 could persist for a long period in a few cells of a given tissue. The association of SV40 with PA suggests some hypotheses. SV40 has a number of characteristics indicating that it may cooperate as a cofactor to the development or progression of human tumors. It has been proposed that the classical Kochs postulates, cannot be applied to latent viruses with oncogenic potential.9,24 New rules should be considered for these viruses to establish their oncogenic role9,24 : 1) presence and persistence of the virus or its nucleic acid in tumor cells; 2) cell immortalization or neoplastic transformation after transfection of the viral genome or its subgenomic fragments; 3) demonstration that the transformed phenotype of the primary tumor and the modifications induced by transfection of cultured cells depend on specific functions expressed by the viral genome; 4) epidemiological and clinical evidence that viral infection represents a risk factor for tumor development.
SV40 fulfils the first three criteria, suggesting that SV40 may cooperate as a cofactor to the development or progression of human pleomorphic adenomas and other neoplasms. Indeed, SV40 DNA is present and expressed in human tumors. SV40 is oncogenic in rodents and in humans, and it is mutagenic and clastogenic in animal and human cells. SV40 Tag is a transforming protein which behaves like an activated oncogene. It binds and inactivates the products of tumor suppressor genes p53 and pRb family and co-activator factors p300 and p400 abolishing their functions.9,10 SV40 cooperating with the c-ras activated oncogene and the catalytic subunit of the telomerase transforms human fibroblasts25 and astrocytes in vitro.26 Transgenic mice expressing SV40 Tag develop adenocarcinomas in submandibular glands.14,15 It should be noted that SV40 lytic activity in most human cells is minimal, while its transforming properties may operate during a long period of latent/persistence infection. Under these conditions SV40 oncogenicity may act inducing immortalization/transformation or proliferation of clonal neoplastic cells in a population of SV40 latently infected cells. The assessment of the fourth postulate is at present under investigation both in the United States27 and Italy (our laboratories).
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (to M.T.), C.N.R. Target Project "Biotechnology" (to M.T.), and M.I.U.R. PRIN (to M.T.), and Local Projects (to M.T. and F.C.). M.M. was supported by a fellowship from the Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Milano).
M.M. and F.M. contributed equally to this work.
Accepted for publication July 12, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L. Garcea and M. J. Imperiale Simian Virus 40 Infection of Humans J. Virol., May 1, 2003; 77(9): 5039 - 5045. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |