help button home button Am J Pathol Angiogenesis Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Isaacson, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Isaacson, P. G.
(American Journal of Pathology. 2002;161:1527-1529.)
© 2002 American Society for Investigative Pathology


Commentary

First Steps in Unraveling the Genotype of Enteropathy-Type T-Cell Lymphoma

Ming-Qing Du and Peter G. Isaacson

From the Department of Histopathology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom

In 1937 Fairley and Mackie first drew attention to the association of malabsorption with intestinal lymphoma.1 Later, Gough and colleagues2 noted that the malabsorption often preceded the onset of lymphoma and proposed that the lymphoma was a complication of idiopathic steatorrhea. Subsequent studies confirmed this and, further, showed that the malabsorption was most likely because of celiac disease (gluten-sensitive enteropathy).3,4 In 1978, Isaacson and Wright5,6 showed that small intestinal lymphoma associated with malabsorption/celiac disease was a uniform histological entity, first thought to be of histiocytic origin but subsequently shown by Isaacson and colleagues7 to be of T-cell lineage. This type of lymphoma is now recognized as a specific entity in the World Health Organization lymphoma classification as enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma (ETL).8

ETL may be preceded by celiac disease in which there has been loss of response to gluten withdrawal. This condition, known as refractory sprue9 is, however, not always followed by ETL and may persist for many years without the intervention of lymphoma, sometimes complicated by intestinal ulceration (ulcerative jejunitis),10 eventually resulting in death from malnutrition. Similar ulceration is often present in the nonlymphomatous mucosa in cases of ETL suggesting a link between the two conditions.

This link was strengthened by Murray and colleagues11 who, by polymerase chain reaction analysis of the rearranged TCR gene, first showed that the nonlymphomatous mucosa in cases of ETL contained a monoclonal T-cell population identical to that of the overt lymphoma. Ashton-Key and colleagues12 confirmed this finding and showed, moreover, that T-cell monoclonality was a feature of refractory sprue/ulcerative jejunitis and that the identical monoclonal T-cell population was present in both the mucosa and tumor in cases of subsequent ETL. Both Ashton-Key and colleagues12 and Carbonnel and colleagues13 who confirmed these findings, concluded that refractory sprue was in fact cryptic T-cell lymphoma.

Immunophenotypic characterization of ETL and refractory sprue has helped to identify the origin of the neoplastic cells in both these conditions. The majority of ETLs are composed of pleomorphic medium-sized to large, sometimes anaplastic cells that are usually CD3+, CD4-, and CD8-. In a minority the cells are small and round and express CD3, CD8, and CD56.14 Cellier and colleagues15,16 showed that in contrast to normal or celiac mucosa, where the majority of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) are CD3+, CD4-, CD8+, in refractory sprue the phenotype of IEL is aberrant, being identical to the cells of ETL. Interestingly, in CD56+ ETL cases CD56+ IELs are present in abundance in the uninvolved, but monoclonal mucosa.17 It is, therefore, cytologically normal IELs bearing the lymphoma phenotype that constitute the monoclonal T-cell population detected in refractory sprue and nonlymphomatous mucosa in ETL. The accumulation of these immunophenotypically aberrant, monoclonal IELs represents the first step in the genesis of ETL.

Like nonneoplastic IELs both ETL cells and IELs in refractory sprue express activation-dependent cytotoxic molecules such as TIA-1 and granzyme B, again in keeping with their derivation from the phenotypically matched, activated intraepithelial lymphocytes in the normal intestinal mucosa. The expression of cytolytic molecules by these cells is thought, at least in part, to be, responsible for the epithelial damage in refractory sprue and ETL.

Despite the steady progress in clarification of the clinicopathological features of ETL and its relationship to refractory sprue, there is little understanding of the genetic and epigenetic events that underlie the development of ETL. Epstein-Barr virus has been detected in a minority of cases18 but the viral infection is often restricted to a small subpopulation of tumor cells and is to an extent epidemiologically dependent,19 questioning its etiological role in ETL. Accumulation of p53 protein has been observed in more than 90% of ETLs in a single study,11 but it remains unclear whether the p53 accumulation in ELT is the result of genetic changes.

In this issue of The American Journal of Pathology, Zettl and colleagues20 report the first comprehensive survey of genetic changes in ETL using the technique of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). They demonstrate recurrent chromosomal gains at 9q, 7q, 5q, and 1q, and recurrent losses at 8p, 13q, and 9p. Among these chromosomal imbalances, gain of 9q is the most frequent, accounting for 58% of the cases examined, with 9q33-34 being the minimal overlapping region. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, using a probe for 9q34 confirmed a gain of 9q34 in each of the four cases examined, further narrowing down the region of chromosomal gain to 9q34. These genetic changes detected by CGH may play a important role in the pathogenesis of ETL because patients with more than three genetic imbalances had a significantly worse outcome than those with three or less.

Among lymphoid malignancies, gain of chromosome 9q34 is most frequently found in ETL and seems to be characteristic of that condition. As highlighted by Zettl and colleagues,20 there are a number of known genes in the chromosome 9q34 region potentially involved in lymphomagenesis such as Notch1/Tan1, CDK9, ABL1, VAV2, and LHX2, which might be the genes targeted in ETL. Interestingly, a search of the literature reveals that gains of chromosome 9q34 also occur frequently in several nonhematological tumors including functioning endocrine pancreatic tumors,21 oral squamous cell carcinomas,22 uterine leiomyomas,23 and sporadic parathyroid adenomas.24 In functioning endocrine pancreatic tumors and uterine leiomyomas, gain of chromosome 9q34 is the most typical, and often the only detectable aberration.21,23 It remains to be seen, however, whether the same gene(s) at 9q34 is targeted by ETL and nonhematological tumors.

The recent recognition that IELs in refractory sprue constitute a cryptic neoplasm, affords the opportunity to examine this tumor cell population for genetic changes by CGH using microdissected or isolated IELs and degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction. This should allow identification of gains and losses critical for malignant transformation. By comparison of the CGH profile between refractory sprue and subsequent ETL it should, further, be possible to identify the genetic changes responsible for disease progression.

There are several approaches that can help to map the minimal region of chromosomal gains or losses and to ultimately identify the gene(s) targeted. For chromosomal gains, a series of fluorescence in situ hybridization probes and quantitative polymerase chain reaction may be applied, whereas for chromosomal losses, a series of microsatellite markers could be selected from the database and used for screening for loss of heterozygosity. In addition, CGH profiles could be compared with the transcriptional profile generated by comparative expressed sequence hybridization25 or microarrays, and the concurrent change, which are likely to be highly indicative of the locus or gene targeted, could be identified. The availability of these technologies and the sequence database of complete human genome give the assurance that identification of genetic factors associated with the pathogenesis of ETL will not be too far in the future.

In several respects the pathogenesis of ETL resembles that of gastric MALT lymphoma, in which Helicobacter pylori infection and its associated immune responses play a critical role. First, the development of ETL is invariably preceded by celiac disease in which there is chronic antigenic stimulation by gluten that is responsible for the recruitment of increased numbers of IELs. Second, celiac disease responds to withdrawal of gluten with return of the IEL population to normal, clearly indicating that antigen stimulation plays a critical role in recruiting and sustaining this T-cell population in the intestinal mucosa. Third, the malignant clone in ETL derives from reactive IELs. Unlike gastric MALT B-cell lymphoma, however, removal of the antigen has no effect on the early neoplastic lymphocyte population. Nevertheless, lessons derived from both MALT lymphoma and ETL serve to underline the critical role of epigenetic as well as genetic factors in the pathogenesis of lymphoma.

Footnotes

Address reprint requests to Dr. Peter G. Isaacson, Department of Histopathology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, University St., London, WC1E 6JJ UK. E-mail: p.isaacson{at}ucl.ac.uk

Accepted for publication August 20, 2002.

References

  1. Fairley NH, Mackie FP: The clinical and biochemical syndrome in lymphadenoma and allied diseases involving the mesenteric lymph glands. Br Med J 1937, 1:375-380
  2. Gough KB, Read AE, Naish JM: Intestinal reticulosis as a complication of idiopathic steatorrhoea. Gut 1962, 3:232-239
  3. Harris OD, Cooke WT, Thompson H, Waterhouse JA: Malignancy in adult coeliac disease and idiopathic steatorrhoea. Am J Med 1967, 42:899-912[Medline]
  4. Freeman HJ, Weinstein WM, Shnitka TK, Piercey JR, Wensel RH: Primary abdominal lymphoma. Presenting manifestation of celiac sprue or complicating dermatitis herpetiformis. Am J Med 1977, 63:585-594[Medline]
  5. Isaacson P, Wright DH: Intestinal lymphoma associated with malabsorption. Lancet 1978, 1:67-70[Medline]
  6. Isaacson P, Wright DH: Malignant histiocytosis of the intestine. Its relationship to malabsorption and ulcerative jejunitis. Hum Pathol 1978, 9:661-677[Medline]
  7. Isaacson PG, O’Connor NT, Spencer J, Bevan DH, Connolly CE, Kirkham N, Pollock DJ, Wainscoat JS, Stein H, Mason DY: Malignant histiocytosis of the intestine: a T-cell lymphoma. Lancet 1985, 2:688-691[Medline]
  8. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW: Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. 2001 IARC Press, Lyon
  9. Trier JS, Falchuk ZM, Carey MC, Schreiber DS: Celiac sprue and refractory sprue. Gastroenterology 1978, 75:307-316[Medline]
  10. Jewell DP: Ulcerative enteritis. Br Med J 1983, 287:1740-1741
  11. Murray A, Cuevas EC, Jones DB, Wright DH: Study of the immunohistochemistry and T cell clonality of enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol 1995, 146:509-519[Abstract]
  12. Ashton Key M, Diss TC, Pan L, Du MQ, Isaacson PG: Molecular analysis of T-cell clonality in ulcerative jejunitis and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol 1997, 151:493-498[Abstract]
  13. Carbonnel F, Grollet-Bioul L, Brouet JC, Teilhac MF, Cosnes J, Angonin R, Deschaseaux M, Chatelet FP, Gendre JP, Sigaux F: Are complicated forms of celiac disease cryptic T-cell lymphomas? Blood 1998, 92:3879-3886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chott A, Haedicke W, Mosberger I, Fodinger M, Winkler K, Mannhalter C, Muller-Hermelink HK: Most CD56+ intestinal lymphomas are CD8+CD5-T-cell lymphomas of monomorphic small to medium size histology. Am J Pathol 1998, 153:1483-1490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Cellier C, Patey N, Mauvieux L, Jabri B, Delabesse E, Cervoni JP, Burtin ML, Guy-Grand D, Bouhnik Y, Modigliani R, Barbier JP, Macintyre E, Brousse N, Cerf-Bensussan N: Abnormal intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes in refractory sprue. Gastroenterology 1998, 114:471-481[Medline]
  16. Cellier C, Delabesse E, Helmer C, Patey N, Matuchansky C, Jabri B, Macintyre E, Cerf-Bensussan N, Brousse N: Refractory sprue, coeliac disease, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. French Coeliac Disease Study Group. Lancet 2000, 356:203-208[Medline]
  17. Bagdi E, Diss TC, Munson P, Isaacson PG: Mucosal intra-epithelial lymphocytes in enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, ulcerative jejunitis, and refractory celiac disease constitute a neoplastic population. Blood 1999, 94:260-264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pan LX, Diss TC, Peng HZ, Lu Q, Wotherspoon AC, Thomas JA, Isaacson PG: Epstein Barr virus (EBV) in enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma (EATL). J Pathol 1993, 170:137-143[Medline]
  19. Quintanilla-Martinez L, Lome-Maldonado C, Ott G, Gschwendtner A, Gredler E, Angeles-Angeles A, Reyes E, Fend F: Primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the intestine: high prevalence of Epstein Barr virus in Mexican lymphoma as compared with European cases. Blood 1997, 89:644-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Zettl A, Ott G, Makulik A, Katzenberger T, Starostik P, Eichler T, Puppe B, Bentz M, Muller-Hermelink HK, Chott A: Chromosomal gains at 9q characterize enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol 2002, 161:1635-1645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Speel EJ, Scheidweiler AF, Zhao J, Matter C, Saremaslani P, Roth J, Heitz PU, Komminoth P: Genetic evidence for early divergence of small functioning and nonfunctioning endocrine pancreatic tumors: gain of 9q34 is an early event in insulinomas. Cancer Res 2001, 61:5186-5192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wolff E, Girod S, Liehr T, Vorderwulbecke U, Ries J, Steininger H, Gebhart E: Oral squamous cell carcinomas are characterized by a rather uniform pattern of genomic imbalances detected by comparative genomic hybridisation. Oral Oncol 1998, 34:186-190[Medline]
  23. Levy B, Mukherjee T, Hirschhorn K: Molecular cytogenetic analysis of uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000, 121:1-8[Medline]
  24. Garcia JL, Tardio JC, Gutierrez NC, Gonzalez MB, Polo JR, Hernandez JM, Menarguez J: Chromosomal imbalances identified by comparative genomic hybridization in sporadic parathyroid adenomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2002, 146:209-213[Abstract]
  25. Lu YJ, Williamson D, Clark J, Wang R, Tiffin N, Skelton L, Gordon T, Williams R, Allan B, Jackman A, Cooper C, Pritchard-Jones K, Shipley J: Comparative expressed sequence hybridization to chromosomes for tumor classification and identification of genomic regions of differential gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:9197-9202[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Isaacson, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Isaacson, P. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS