| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Animal Model |




From the Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology,* School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis; and Genentech Inc.,
South San Francisco, California
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The classical view of the airway epithelium as a passive barrier and target for the inflammatory response has been replaced. In recent years, a more complex concept has emerged that epithelial cells can be active participants in the pathogenic processes critical to the development of the physiological manifestation of asthma, namely airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness. The epithelium can amplify the inflammatory response with the secretion of cytokines, chemokines, and other proinflammatory proteins and peptides7-9 and the secretion of growth factors may orchestrate airway remodeling.8,9 One of the underlying reasons why the epithelium of asthmatics maintains its state of activation with the release of proinflammatory mediators and growth factors may be fundamental differences in the response of the epithelium to stress and repair.7 There is evidence that epithelial cells of asthmatics respond abnormally to environmental stimuli.10 Furthermore, changes in the epithelial phenotype itself may play a role in the maintenance of asthma, particularly increased mucus production, which contributes to airflow obstruction. Mucus plugging has been identified at postmortem examination in patients who have died from asthma, even in the smallest airways, which lack mucus-secreting cells.11,12
Mouse models are increasingly used in asthma research primarily because of the availability of a wide range of immunological tools, however these models lack the documentation of quantitative pathology and site-specific airway changes, which are crucial to our understanding of airway remodeling. The experiments described in this article enhance our understanding of the role that epithelium plays in asthma by documenting the changes occurring in the bronchial epithelium at different airway generations during the development of the asthmatic phenotype in allergic sensitized and challenged mice. We tested the hypothesis that epithelial cell death (necrosis, apoptosis) results in stem cell proliferation and replacement of the Clara and ciliated cell population with mucous cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 132 male BALB/c BYJ mice (6 to 8 weeks old on arrival) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME. The animals were housed in an Association for the Assessment of Laboratory Animal Care accredited facility under specific pathogen-free conditions. All studies were conducted in accordance with an approved protocol.
Model Validation
Eighteen 8-week-old BALB/c BYJ male mice were sensitized with 10 µg of ovalbumin (OVA) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 1 mg of aluminum hydroxide (Intergen Co., Purchase, NY) in 0.1 ml vol of Dulbeccos phosphate-buffered saline intraperitoneally on days 0 and 7. Eighteen control mice received 1 mg of aluminum hydroxide in 0.1 ml of Dulbeccos phosphate-buffered saline. Starting on day 14, all mice received 20-minute OVA inhalation challenges in a custom-built pie acrylic exposure chamber that separated the mice from each other. Challenges were repeated on days 17 and 20. The aerosol was delivered using the PARI IS-2 nebulizer at 22 PSI containing 10 mg/ml OVA with 0.01% Tween-20 that produced a particle size of 2.75-µm mass median aerodynamic diameter with a span of 1.98 µm.
Airflow obstruction during antigen challenge was measured on day 22. Forty-eight hours after the third aerosol challenge, 10 sensitized mice and 10 control mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital (25 mg/kg) and urethane (1.8 g/kg), tracheotomized, and a saline-filled cannula was placed two-thirds of the way down the esophagus. Mice were then loaded into an acrylic pressure plethysmograph for measurement of thoracic expansion and esophageal pressure. Respiratory resistance and dynamic compliance were calculated from the simultaneous measurement of tidal volume, esophageal pressure, and gas flow rate in the respiratory system. Data were collected using an automated data acquisition program (Buxco Electronics Inc., Sharron, CT). A total of 3.5 ml of OVA (10 mg/ml) was aerosolized every other 2 minutes for 20 minutes (total exposure 10 minutes) using a PARI IS-2 nebulizer as described above. Data were expressed as a maximum percentage increase in respiratory resistance in which the baseline resistance was expressed as 100%.
Airway hyperresponsiveness was also measured on day 22 in different groups of similarly treated mice. These remaining eight sensitized mice and eight control mice were anesthetized and prepared for continuous measurement of breathing mechanics and ventilation as described above. Methacholine was aerosolized using a PARI IS-2 nebulizer for 1 minute and then stopped for a 5-minute period. This protocol was repeated six times as the dose of methacholine (0, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/ml) was increased. Data were expressed as provocative concentration 50%, which is the dose of methacholine required to give a 50% increase in respiratory resistance.
Sensitized mice and nonsensitized controls were sacrificed after the pulmonary function tests at the end of the experiment. Blood was collected via the retro-orbital sinus. Using an aliquot of saline (0.03 ml x body weight in g) bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was collected by lavaging the lungs three times with the same aliquot. Lungs were removed and inflated with 10% formalin to 80% of total lung capacity before embedding and sectioning. Total cell counts and differential leukocyte counts were performed on the BAL samples. Stains performed on the tissues were hematoxylin and eosin and periodic-acid Schiff/alcian blue, pH 2.5 (PAS/AB). Serum samples were assayed for total IgE as previously described.13
Epithelial Injury
Differential permeability to fluorescent dyes was used to identify epithelial necrosis. Thirty-six BALB/c BYJ mice were sensitized and challenged with OVA as described previously as were nine control mice. At 6, 12, and 24 hours after each of the three aerosol challenges, three sensitized mice and one control mouse per group were sacrificed and the lungs lavaged with 12 µmol/L of ethidium homodiemer-1 (EthD-1) (Molecular Probes Inc. Eugene, OR) in Gibcos Hams F12 media (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) at a volume of 0.03 ml x body weight (g) at 37°C. After 20 minutes of incubation in the dark, the EthD-1 was gently withdrawn and the lungs were washed out with a similar volume of saline at 37°C. The combined lavage was reserved and cytospins prepared and examined under a fluorescent microscope for EthD-1-positive cells. The lungs were then fixed with an intratracheal infusion of Karnovskys fixative before removal from the animal. Fixed specimens were microdissected to expose the branching pattern of the lung lobe and counterstained with 2 µmol/L of Yo-Pro-1 Iodide (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) to label the cell nuclei. Samples were then examined as whole wet mounts on a laser-scanning confocal microscope. Additional 5-µm tissue sections were used to detect the presence of apoptotic cells in the epithelium with a terminal dUTP nick-end labeling assay kit (Oncors Apoptag Kit) (Intergen, Purchase, NY).
Epithelial Proliferation and Mucous Cell Morphometry
Thirty sensitized and 30 nonsensitized mice were generated as previously described. On day 13, 24 hours before the first aerosol challenge, each mouse was anesthetized with isofluorane and osmotic pumps (Alzet pump model 2002; Durect Co., Cupertino, CA) loaded with 5-chloro-2-deoxyuridine (Cldu) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (75 mg/ml) were implanted subcutaneously between the scapulae. On days 16, 19, and 22, 48 hours after each of the aerosol challenges, 10 sensitized mice and 10 nonsensitized mice were sacrificed and their lungs were fixed in 10% formalin as previously described. A segment of duodenum was also collected in 10% formalin as a control for Cldu immunohistochemistry.
The right cranial lung lobe was microdissected along the main axial pathway of the airways14
and embedded in paraffin, so that on sectioning the branching pattern of the airway tree was revealed (Figure 1)
. Alternate serial sections 30-µm-thick and 5-µm-thick were cut. The 30-µm sections were used for immunohistochemistry to detect Cldu and the 5-µm sections were stained with PAS/AB. The incorporated Cldu was detected using a monoclonal antibody (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA) and immunohistochemical techniques as outlined by Hsu and colleagues.15
|
![]() |
The 5-µm PAS/AB-stained vertical sections were used to calculate the volume of mucus per surface area of basal lamina using a staggered cycloid grid.16,17
Images were captured at x40 on a light microscope, using NIH image software (version 1.62; NIH, Bethesda, MD) and then imported into the program stereology toolbox (version 1.1; Morphometrix, Davis, CA) for analysis. The volume density of mucin in the airway epithelium was determined by a point count with the staggered cycloid grid. Points within the grid that fell on areas stained positive by the PAS/AB stain were counted as points on mucin (Pmuc) and points falling on epithelial cells of all types were counted as points on epithelium (Pepi). Lines within the grid crossing the basal lamina were counted as intersects of the basal lamina (Ibl). Then the volume of mucin per volume of epithelium was calculated as
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Characterization and Morphometry of Epithelial Cell Types
Samples for transmission electron microscopy were selected from representative airways along the microdissected, major axial pathway (Figure 1)
. Three sensitized mice were examined at day 22, 48 hours after the final aerosol challenge and two mice at each of the time points 6, 12, and 24 hours after the first aerosol challenge along with appropriate control mice. Samples were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in a series of ethanol baths and embedded in Araldite. One-µm sections were cut from each airway so that the epithelium was cut perpendicular to the basal lamina and then stained with toluidine blue. Two blocks were selected by stratified sampling from each airway region (Figure 1)
. Sections from these small blocks (1- to 2-mm face) were placed on grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate before viewing on a Zeiss EM-10A transmission electron microscope. A montage of micrographs was made from each airway for examination at x2000 magnification.
At the final time point, day 22, additional sections (5 1-µm in series) processed and stained with toluidine blue as described above, were evaluated using the Physical Dissector component of the Computer-Assisted Stereology Toolbox software system (CAST-Grid; Olympus, International Stereology Center, Albertslund, Denmark) to determine the numbers of ciliated, Clara, and mucous cells per volume of epithelium (Nvcell,epi) in the proximal zone (PB and PMLA) (Figure 1)
. A 5-µm physical dissector (sections 1 and 5 of the series) was used for the measurements using the following formula16
![]() |
![]() |
The arithmetic mean thickness of the epithelium was also measured using the following formula18
![]() |
Categorization of ciliated, mucous, and Clara cells was dependent on their morphological features and cells that did not meet the required criteria were categorized as other cells. Clara cells classically had a basal nucleus; the apical part of the cell projected into the lumen and was packed with well-organized arrays of smooth endoplasmic reticulum. In most cells classified as Clara cells, circular electron-dense membrane-bound secretory vesicles were located in the apical region of the cell and some cells had small microvilli at the cell surface. Ciliated cells were cubiodal or columnar with a large basal nucleus, a cytoplasm that was more electron lucent than the Clara cell and the presence of either cilia or basal bodies aligned adjacent to the apical surface. Any cell that contained identifiable mucus, namely membrane-bound vacuoles containing homogenous to fibrillar electron-lucent material in the cytoplasm was identified as a mucous cell. Often these cells had features of Clara cells although when they became heavily laden with mucus these features were no longer identifiable. Cells classified as other cells often had a small basal nucleus, were triangular with minimal cytoplasm, and did not appear to be in contact with the lumen. Many of these cells were probably basal cells.
Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using Minitab version 13.1 software and all data were reported as means plus or minus SE from the mean. Analysis of variance tests were run. The morphometric data were analyzed by analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test for multiple pairwise comparisons. (SYSTAT 10; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P values <0.05 were accepted as a significant result.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Before the characterization of the epithelial lesions, the asthma model was validated on day 22. At this time, a significant increase in airway hyperresponsiveness to aerosolized methacholine (P < 0.001) (Figure 2)
and airflow obstruction to aerosolized OVA (P = 0.016) (Figure 2)
were seen in sensitized mice. This was accompanied by increased numbers of white blood cells in the BAL (P = 0.007) (Figure 2)
, which was predominantly because of increases in the influx of lymphocytes (P = 0.001) and eosinophils (P = 0.005). Serum IgE (P = 0.001) (Figure 2)
was also significantly increased in the sensitized mice compared to the controls. Evaluation of histopathology demonstrated that the lungs of sensitized mice had marked perivascular and peribronchiolar eosinophilic and lymphocytic inflammation. Additionally, increased numbers of mucous cells were observed in the epithelium, which became progressively more numerous as the number of aerosol challenges increased. The data from each of these end points validate that allergen sensitization followed by aerosolized allergen challenge results in mice that demonstrate characteristics of asthma, including airflow obstruction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and an eosinophilic and lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate.
|
EthD-1, a sensitive indicator of irreversible cell injury, is taken up by cells with increased cell membrane permeability (ie, cells undergoing necrosis).19 Although several time points were examined, 6, 12, and 24 hours after each of the three aerosol challenges, there was no evidence of increased uptake of EthD-1 by epithelial cells in the sensitized mice, indicative of the lack of epithelial necrosis. Similarly, when a terminal dUTP nick-end labeling assay was performed on sections of tissue from the same time points, no evidence of any apoptotic cells in the epithelium was seen in either the sensitized or nonsensitized mice. Taken together these data suggest that there was no necrosis or apoptosis evident at any of the time points examined.
Epithelial Proliferation and Mucous Cell Morphometry
Cldu immunohistochemistry provided a cumulative index of epithelial proliferation in the airways, which increased in all airway levels with OVA sensitization and challenge (Figure 3)
. At each time point epithelial proliferation was more marked in the distal zone (DMLA and Br) compared to the proximal zone (PB and PMLA) and this difference between the proliferation in the distal and proximal zones was amplified with increasing number of aerosol challenges (Figure 3)
. By the second aerosol challenge, the numbers of proliferating cells in the epithelium were significantly increased at all airway levels compared to nonsensitized animals except in the PB (PMLA, P = 0.05; DMLA, P = 0.003; Br, P < 0.000). These proliferative events were accompanied by a marked increase in the number of mucus containing cells in the proximal zone but also included an increase in mucus-containing cells in more distal airways, especially as the number of aerosol challenges increased (Figure 4)
. In the proximal zone of sensitized mice, the mucous cells had a significantly greater volume of stained mucosubstance per unit area of basement membrane compared to control mice, even after a single aerosol challenge (PB, P = 0.001; PMLA, P = 0.005). In the distal zone, after two aerosol challenges there was a significant increase in the volume of mucus in the DMLA (P = 0.002). Control mice had only rare mucous cells in the proximal airways and no mucous cells in the distal airways.
|
|
|
By day 22, after three aerosol challenges, 1-µm toluidine blue sections analyzed using the physical dissector procedure demonstrate that there was a dramatic shift in the phenotype of the epithelium in sensitized mice compared to nonsensitized controls, particularly in the proximal zone where mucous cells were replacing the normal epithelium. Although the number of proliferating cells per unit area of basement membrane in the proximal zone was significantly increased (P < 0.000), only 15% of the total number of cells had undergone proliferation by day 22 (Figure 6)
. Mucus cells significantly increased (P = 0.01) after sensitization whereas Clara cells significantly decreased (P = 0.017) but even though there was a small decrease in the numbers of ciliated cells this was not significant (Figure 6)
. Although there was no significant difference in the total number of cells per unit area of basement membrane in the proximal zone, the epithelial height was significantly increased (P = 0.001) in sensitized mice in the proximal zone (Figure 7)
, indicating that the average cell volume was increasing. This suggests that smaller Clara cells were being replaced by larger mucous cells. In the lower airways there were no significant differences in the total number of cells per unit area, height of the epithelium, or between different cell types.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our documentation of the lesions by time and airway generation is similar to other studies with lung toxicants that have highlighted the fact that different airway generations in the mouse can respond to the same insult in a different manner.20 Additionally, recent studies in human asthmatics have shown that neither the epithelium nor the associated inflammatory response is uniform along the entire airway tree, but that significant differences exist between large and small airways.21
Descriptions of asthma have classically been associated with epithelial disruption and desquamation as originally described by Laitinen and colleagues22
Clinically, epithelial injury has been correlated with both patient symptoms and bronchial reactivity.23,24
Damage to the bronchial epithelium has been observed in asthmatic airways at postmortem25
or by bronchoscopy24,26
and large numbers of epithelial cells in clumps have been seen in asthmatic sputum especially during exacerbations.27
In a monkey asthma model epithelial denudation is seen early on, at
6 months after the initial sensitization, as detected by increased numbers of epithelial cells in the BAL.28
Conversely, other studies concluded that there was no evidence of epithelial desquamation in mild29
or even fatal asthma.30
Although the majority of the evidence supports epithelial denudation as a feature of asthma, the lesions may vary depending on the stage or severity of disease and stability of the patient or response to treatment.
In asthmatic humans, some studies suggest that the ciliated cell undergoes preferential damage22,31 but although the number of ciliated cells in the epithelium in our study were slightly decreased this was not a significant effect and was not associated with increased markers of apoptosis. Furthermore, we did not see any evidence of epithelial cell death (necrosis or apoptosis) at the time points we examined, which was similar to other studies in mice.32-34 It is still possible that we missed the crucial time point because of the sample times used to detect these changes. In vivo, apoptotic cells are cleared within hours by macrophages and other cells. This may have occurred before DNA single-strand breaks and fragmentation, the marker detected by the terminal dUTP nick-end labeling assay. Even though eosinophils are present in the lung tissue and BAL, the lack of significant eosinophil degranulation in mouse asthma models35-37 may explain the lack of epithelial necrosis. This may be a fundamental difference between the behavior of eosinophils in mouse asthma models compared to human asthmatics.36 Ultrastructural studies in humans have demonstrated extensive eosinophil degranulation in airway tissue during active disease.38-40
Despite the lack of any detectable necrosis or apoptosis, an increase in epithelial proliferation was detected with Cldu immunohistochemistry at all airway levels 2 days after the first aerosol challenge and it increased still further with the number of aerosol challenges. This increase in cell proliferation is consistent with other models of asthma in sensitized Brown-Norway rats,41-43 guinea-pigs,44 and mice.34,45 For any given time point, Cldu-positive epithelial cells occurred more frequently in distal than proximal airway epithelium in sensitized mice and this difference became more pronounced with increasing airway challenges. Electron microscopy of the distal airways demonstrated that the cell type proliferating in the distal airways had the morphological characteristics of the Clara cell. Although epithelial proliferation was significantly increased in the proximal zone by day 22, still only 15% of the total numbers of cells had undergone proliferation. One potential explanation could be that some stem cells (Clara cells) were proliferating and undergoing metaplasia while other Clara/ciliated cells were sloughing, because we have shown that the majority of the mucous cells were not proliferating and we did not observe Clara/ciliated cells in apoptosis or necrosis. In a mouse OVA model, epithelial proliferation could be partially reversed by treatment with dexamethasone, which has potent anti-inflammatory properties.34 Therefore proliferation may simply be the response to increased levels of growth factors and other mitogenic stimuli found in inflamed environments or it may play an integral role in amplifying the allergic response. To our knowledge, increased rates of epithelial proliferation have not been documented in untreated human asthmatics although asthmatics treated with steroids may have increased epithelial proliferation.46 To the contrary, some evidence even suggests proliferation may be impaired in epithelial cells of untreated asthmatics despite extensive damage, revealing a potential failure in the epithelial injury-repair cycle.47,48
A profound change in epithelial cell phenotype, most notably excessive production of airway mucus glycoproteins, is also one of the hallmarks of human asthma. Although mucous cell metaplasia in this model was primarily confined to the proximal airways, its distal progression with increasing numbers of aerosol challenges may be critical to the development of airflow obstruction in the mouse.49
This generation-dependent distribution may be a result of cumulative allergen deposition in the lung or reflect regional differences in the response of the epithelium to antigen. The increase in mucous cells in the proximal airways developed after a single aerosol challenge as seen in electron micrographs and before evidence of epithelial proliferation. Furthermore, Cldu immunohistochemistry and PAS/AB double stains performed on tissue sections from mice given the three aerosol challenges revealed that only 10% of the mucus-containing cells had undergone proliferation. Together, this data indicates that metaplasia accounts for the majority of the increase in mucous cells with proliferation playing a minor role later on. Induction of the mucous cell phenotype as an early event after a single aerosol challenge concurs with observations made by other investigators.32,33,50
The increase in the numbers of mucous cells in the proximal airways was accompanied by a compensatory decrease in Clara cell numbers and a small decrease in ciliated cell numbers. In normal mice the bronchi are lined by a simple cuboidal epithelium where
50% are Clara cells that are not PAS/AB-positive.51
The remaining cells are predominantly ciliated cells with a few basal cells and there are rare mucus-secreting cells. We did observe the appearance of mucus in some Clara cells 12 hours after the first OVA challenge, which has also been previously documented,33
and by 48 to 72 hours the entire supranuclear cytoplasm was packed with mucus granules. This observation, along with the previously described scarcity of double-staining PAS/AB and Cldu-positive cells and shifts in cell phenotype without a difference in cell numbers, is further evidence that Clara cells are undergoing metaplasia to mucous cells. Despite the pronounced shift in cell phenotypes in the proximal airways, there was no difference in the number of epithelial cells per surface area of basal lamina. However, the epithelium was significantly taller in asthmatic mice, which could be accounted for by an increase in the average cell volume as smaller Clara cells underwent metaplasia to larger mucous cells.
The conclusions drawn from our mouse model cannot be readily extrapolated to the human because the epithelium lining the bronchi, where the majority of airway remodeling takes place in human asthmatics, is very different. The human bronchi are lined by a pseudostratified columnar epithelium primarily composed of ciliated and mucous cells with smaller numbers of basal cells and rare serous and neuroendocrine cells. Mucous glands are present in the submucosa and these glands are also associated with some serous cells. The numbers of Clara cells in the human airways do not increase until the level of the respiratory bronchioles. Therefore metaplasia of the Clara cell to a mucous cell is not going to play a major role in the increase in mucus seen in the bronchial airways of asthmatic humans. In a study looking at human tissue from asthmatics in which similar unbiased stereological techniques were used, the authors also concluded that stored mucin in the epithelium was three times higher in asthmatics compared to controls and was because of a doubling in mucous cell number rather than an increase in volume.52 The authors could not address whether the increase in mucous cells was true mucous cell hyperplasia or a result of metaplasia. Therefore it is still possible that metaplasia of a cell type other than the Clara cell, such as the serous cell, may account in part, for the increased number of mucous cells observed in the airway epithelium and mucous glands of human asthmatics.
The data presented in this study confirms a dramatic shift in cell phenotype within the epithelium, which was primarily a result of Clara cell differentiation to mucous cells. Interestingly, the mechanism behind this change in epithelial phenotype did not follow our hypothesis. In our model, epithelial cell death does not appear to be the stimulus that drives epithelial proliferation. Moreover epithelial proliferation itself does not account for the majority of the increase in mucous cell numbers. As in human asthmatics, allergic airways in mice show similar increases in mucous cells, where chronic degranulation may represent a mechanism for airway obstruction in asthma, although the mechanisms behind this increase are likely to be different between the two species.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Support by Genentech Inc. and the American Lung Association of California (grant RT 016-L).
Accepted for publication February 28, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Pantano, J. L. Ather, J. F. Alcorn, M. E. Poynter, A. L. Brown, A. S. Guala, S. L. Beuschel, G. B. Allen, L. A. Whittaker, M. Bevelander, et al. Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation in Airway Epithelium Induces Inflammation and Hyperresponsiveness Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2008; 177(9): 959 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Stripp and S. D. Reynolds Maintenance and Repair of the Bronchiolar Epithelium Proceedings of the ATS, April 15, 2008; 5(3): 328 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhu, C. Ehre, L. H. Abdullah, J. K. Sheehan, M. Roy, C. M. Evans, B. F. Dickey, and C. W. Davis Munc13-2-/- baseline secretion defect reveals source of oligomeric mucins in mouse airways J. Physiol., April 1, 2008; 586(7): 1977 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Buchweitz, J. R. Harkema, and N. E. Kaminski Time-Dependent Airway Epithelial and Inflammatory Cell Responses Induced by Influenza Virus A/PR/8/34 in C57BL/6 Mice Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2007; 35(3): 424 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kouznetsova, C. E. Chwieralski, R. Balder, M. Hinz, A. Braun, N. Krug, and W. Hoffmann Induced Trefoil Factor Family 1 Expression by Trans-Differentiating Clara Cells in a Murine Asthma Model Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2007; 36(3): 286 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tigani, C. Cannet, H. Karmouty-Quintana, F.-X. Ble, S. Zurbruegg, E. Schaeublin, J. R. Fozard, and N. Beckmann Lung inflammation and vascular remodeling after repeated allergen challenge detected noninvasively by MRI Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): L644 - L653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Rawlins, L. E. Ostrowski, S. H. Randell, and B. L. M. Hogan Inaugural Article: Lung development and repair: Contribution of the ciliated lineage PNAS, January 9, 2007; 104(2): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Hyde, L. A. Miller, E. S. Schelegle, M. V. Fanucchi, L. S. Van Winkle, N. K. Tyler, M. V. Avdalovic, M. J. Evans, R. Kajekar, A. R. Buckpitt, et al. Asthma: a comparison of animal models using stereological methods Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2006; 15(101): 122 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Randell Airway Epithelial Stem Cells and the Pathophysiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Proceedings of the ATS, November 1, 2006; 3(8): 718 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pierce, J. Rir-Sima-Ah, I. Estrada, J. Wilder, A. Strasser, and Y. Tesfaigzi Loss of pro-apoptotic Bim promotes accumulation of pulmonary T lymphocytes and enhances allergen-induced goblet cell metaplasia Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): L862 - L870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Homer, Z. Zhu, L. Cohn, C. G. Lee, W. I. White, S. Chen, and J. A. Elias Differential expression of chitinases identify subsets of murine airway epithelial cells in allergic inflammation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): L502 - L511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Holtzman, J. T. Battaile, and A. C. Patel Immunogenetic Programs for Viral Induction of Mucous Cell Metaplasia Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., July 1, 2006; 35(1): 29 - 39. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Rawlins and B. L. M. Hogan Epithelial stem cells of the lung: privileged few or opportunities for many? Development, July 1, 2006; 133(13): 2455 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. W. Williams, A. Sharafkhaneh, V. Kim, B. F. Dickey, and C. M. Evans Airway Mucus: From Production to Secretion Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 527 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tesfaigzi Roles of Apoptosis in Airway Epithelia Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 537 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|