| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

From the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,* the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center,
Albuquerque, New Mexico
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism(s) which trigger and maintain post-injury tubular cell cholesterol accumulation have not been completely defined. To date, our laboratory has most fully evaluated this issue in the glycerol model of rhabdomyolysis-induced acute renal failure (ARF). Because this form of in vivo renal injury is, in large part, mediated via heme Fe-induced oxidative stress,13-16 we have simulated it in cultured proximal tubular (HK-2) cells by the addition of a catalytic Fe (free-radical-generating) challenge. The results of these parallel in vivo and in vitro investigations indicate that increased tubular synthesis contributes to the cholesterol overload state, based on the following information: first, statin-induced inhibition of HMG CoA reductase (HMGCR) prevents cholesterol accumulation in Fe-challenged HK-2 cells;4 and second, acute cell injury increases renal cortical HMGCR protein and its mRNA.1,8
Cellular cholesterol levels are normally tightly regulated, maintaining near constant values.17 Thus, increased synthesis, under otherwise normal circumstances, should trigger a compensatory increase in cholesterol efflux and a decrease in influx. Efflux occurs, at least in part, via the ATP binding cassette (ABC) A1 transporter, which shuttles cholesterol to apo-A1 at, and then away from, the plasma membrane.18-22 FC efflux may also occur via scavenger receptor B1 (SR-B123-26 ; ie, an HDL receptor27,28 ). Following esterification, the effluxed cholesterol is transported to, and then taken up by, a hepatic SR-B1-dependent pathway. Thus, by both extruding FC from extrahepatic cells, and by importing CEs into the liver, SR-B1 helps mediate reverse cholesterol transport (ie, trafficking extrahepatic cholesterol back to the liver29 ). In contrast to ABCA-1 and SR-B1, the LDL receptor (LDL-R) facilitates cellular cholesterol uptake.17 Given these considerations, it would be predicted that a normal compensatory response to increased renal tubular cell cholesterol synthesis would be increased ABCA-1, increased SR-B1, and decreased LDL-R expression.
The above suggests that increased synthesis alone is insufficient to cause post- injury cholesterol overload unless dysregulation of normal compensatory pathways co-exists. Indeed, a recent study from this laboratory provides some limited support for this hypothesis, since SR-B1 levels were found to be decreased following sepsis (or glycerol)- induced ARF.9 Hence, the present study was undertaken to further explore the status of cellular cholesterol transporters and their mRNAs in a post-injury cholesterol overload state.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male CD-1 mice (25 to 35 g; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used for all in vivo experiments. Rhabdomyolysis-associated ARF was induced by intramuscular glycerol injection (50%; 9 ml/kg, administered in equally divided doses into the upper hind limbs under light anesthesia with isoflurane). Following glycerol injection, the mice were allowed to recover from anesthesia and provided with free food and water access. At either 4 or 18 hours following glycerol injection, the mice were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital (1 to 2 mg; i.p. injection). For those mice which had received glycerol injection 4 hours prior, the kidneys were resected through a midline abdominal incision and placed on ice. For mice injected with glycerol
18 hours previously, a
200-µl heparinized blood sample was withdrawn from the inferior vena cava for urea nitrogen (BUN) analysis. This was immediately followed by kidney resection. The renal cortices were dissected on ice with a razor blade and then used for either: 1) free cholesterol and cholesteryl ester quantification (chloroform:methanol extraction, followed by gas chromatographic analysis, as previously described in detail 4
); or 2) Western blot analysis of either ABCA-1 or SR-B1, as described below. In each experiment, an equal number of sham-treated mice and glycerol-injected mice were simultaneously collected and analyzed together (n for each group presented in figure legends).
Renal Cortical LDL-R mRNA Levels Following Glycerol-Induced Renal Injury
LDL-R protein could not be quantified in renal cortical samples due to the lack of a suitable antibody for Western blotting. Hence, to gain insight into its expression, LDL-R mRNA was assessed. To this end, mice were injected with glycerol and kidneys were resected at either 3, 4, or 18 hours post-glycerol injection (n = 5, 8, and 8 mice respectively). Kidneys from 14 sham-treated mice were used as controls. Cortical samples were immediately placed in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and total RNA was extracted as per the manufacturers instructions. The final RNA pellet was brought up in RNase-free water to an approximate concentration of 3 mg/ml. The samples were electrophoresed for 30 minutes through 1.2% agarose containing ethidium bromide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to ensure lack of degradation of the samples (preservation of 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA). The samples were then analyzed for LDL-R and GAPDH (as a housekeeping gene) mRNAs as described below. (Note: Results from the 3 and 4 hours post-glycerol injection groups did not significantly differ, and hence, they were combined for further statistical analysis.)
HK-2 Cell Experiments
Fe-Induced Oxidative Stress
HK-2 cells, an immortalized human proximal tubular cell line,30
were used for all in vitro experiments. They were cultured in T-75 flasks with keratinocyte serum-free medium (K-SFM) and passaged by trypsinization every 5 to 6 days, as previously described.30
After splitting and allowing an
8- to
16-hour recovery period, the cells were either maintained under continued control culture conditions (control cells), or they were subjected to either a 4-hour or an 18-hour oxidant challenge. This consisted of ferrous ammonium sulfate, complexed to equimolar hydroxyquinoline (HQ), a siderophore which allows Fe to gain ready intracellular access.8
The 4-hour and 18-hour challenges used 10-µmol/L FeHQ and 7.5-µmol/L FeHQ concentrations, respectively. The cells were then recovered, first by centrifugation of any detached cells, and then by removing adherent cells with a cell scraper, as previously described.8
This was followed by extraction of either protein or total RNA for use in Western blotting or multiplexing RT-PCR respectively, as described below. Note: these Fe challenges have previously been shown to cause <10% and
30% to 40% cell death (LDH release) at the 4- and 18-hour time points, respectively.
Effect of Statin Treatment on HK-2 cell SR-B1, ABCA-1, and LDL-R mRNAs
Eight T75 flasks of near confluent HK-2 cells were divided into two equal groups: 1) control incubation for 18 hours, and 2) incubation for 18 hours with 10 µmol/L of mevastatin, as previously described.4 At the completion of the experiments, total RNA was extracted from each flask and subjected to multiplexing RT-PCR for quantification of SR-B1, ABCA-1, LDL-R, and GAPDH mRNAs.
Western Blot Analyses of Cortical and HK-2 Cell Protein Samples
Renal cortical tissue samples were probed by Western blot for SR-B1 and ABCA-1 as previously described.9,31 In the case of SR-B1, 7 µg of protein extract were electrophoresed through a 12% Bis-Tris acrylamide Nupage gel (Invitrogen) and probed with rabbit anti-mouse SR-B1 antibody (catalog number NB-400104; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO) according to manufacturers instructions. For ABCA-1 detection, a 30-µg protein extract sample was electrophoresed through a 4% to 12% gradient Bis-Tris acrylamide Nupage gel (Invitrogen). Rabbit anti-mouse ABCA-1 (catalog number NB-40015: Novus Biologicals) was used as the primary antibody per manufacturers instructions. Secondary detection for both antibodies was performed with horseradish peroxidase-labeled donkey anti-rabbit IgG (catalog number NA 934; Amersham-Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Kit; Amersham-Pharmacia).9,31
HK-2 cell protein extracts were prepared for Western blotting as previously noted31 and probed for SR-B1, ABCA-1, and LDL-R proteins. SR-B1 and ABCA-1 detection was performed as noted above, with 3.5 µg and 30 µg of protein being electrophoresed, respectively. In the case of LDL-R, 25 µg of protein extract were electrophoresed through a 4% to 12% gradient Bis-Tris acrylamide Nupage gel (Invitrogen). Mouse anti-LDL-R (catalog number LP02: Oncogene Research Products, Boston, MA) was used as the primary antibody according to the manufacturers instructions. Secondary detection was performed with horseradish peroxidase-labeled sheep anti-mouse IgG (catalog number NA 931; Amersham Pharmacia) and enhanced chemiluminescence.31
Nonspecific secondary antibody staining in the above Western blots was excluded by the fact that the secondary antibody, in the absence of the primary antibody, did not identify the relevant protein band(s). Equal protein loading/transfer was verified by India ink staining. Relevant protein band analysis was performed by optical density scanning (ABCA-1, 220 kd; SR-B1, 82 kd; nonglycosylated LDL-R 120 kd; glycosylated LDL-R, 160 kd).
Renal Cortical Analysis for LDL-R mRNA
Cortical RNA samples, harvested as noted above, were subjected to reverse transcription with the first strand synthesis kit for RT-PCR (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX). The RT reaction was carried out in RNase-free tubes by first adding
1 µg of RNA to a volume of RNase-free water (giving a total volume of 10 µl). After adding 2 µl of oligo-dt primer and 4 µl of dNTP mix (0.25 mmol/L each), the reaction was incubated at 72°C for 3 minutes, and then rapidly quenched on ice. RT components included 2 µl of 10X buffer (final composition of 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3 + 75 mmol/L KCl + 3 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 µl of recombinant RNase inhibitor, 10 unit/µL), and 1 µl of M-MLV reverse transcriptase (100 units/µg RNA), added as per the manufacturers instructions. The total reaction volume of 20 µl was mixed and incubated at 42°C for 1 hour. The reaction was stopped by heating at 94°C for 10 minutes and storing the products on ice until PCR.
PCR was performed using the first strand synthesis kit for RT-PCR with mouse LDL-R and GAPDH-specific primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA). The specific primers were designed with 50% to 60% GC composition (see Table 1
). The resultant calculated high melting temperature (Tm) (>75°C) allowed for a stringent annealing temperature in the PCR cycles. After RT, 47 µl of a PCR master mix, containing all PCR components and primers for both LDL-R and GAPDH (50 pmol of sense and antisense for each), were added to tubes containing 3 µl of cDNA. Deoxynucleotides were added to a final concentration of 0.125 mmol/L. Reaction buffer (10X) was diluted (1:10) to a final composition of 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, and 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2. After the samples were overlaid with mineral oil, the tubes were placed in a DNA thermal cycler. The thermal cycler was programmed as delineated in Table 1
(rows 1 and 2). PCR product analysis was conducted with 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. cDNA bands were visualized and quantified by densitometry using a Typhoon 8600 scanner (Amersham Pharmacia). LDL-R cDNA bands were expressed as a ratio to the simultaneously obtained GAPDH cDNA band (housekeeping gene).
|
Total RNA was harvested from control and Fe-treated HK-2 cells and electrophoresed through ethidium bromide to ensure RNA integrity.8
RT was conducted as above. The samples were then subjected to multiplexing PCR using specific sense/antisense primers designed for human ABCA-1, SR-B1, LDL-R, and GAPDH (Table 1
, rows 3 to 6) using the conditions described. After PCR product analysis, ABCA-1, SR-B1, and LDL-R cDNA bands were expressed as a ratio to the simultaneously obtained GAPDH cDNA.
Calculations and Statistics
All values are presented as means ± 1 SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed by unpaired Students t-test. Significance was judged by a P value of <0.05. The number of replicates for each experiment are given in the figure legends.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glycerol injection caused severe ARF, as denoted by a marked rise in BUN concentrations (185 ± 22 mg/dl; controls, 29 ± 2; P < 0.0001). The corresponding renal cortical cholesterol assessments demonstrated 45% and 384% increments in FC and CE levels, respectively (see Figure 1
).
|
As shown in the left panel of Figure 2
, at 18 hours post-glycerol injection there was a statistically significant decrease in SR-B1 expression, as observed by Western blot analysis (protein detection at
58 kd). Of note, these SR-B1 data were previously presented in written form9
and are presented here for comparison with subsequent renal cortical/HK-2 cell data.
|
220 kd (Figure 2Renal Cortical LDL-R mRNA Expression Post in Vivo Injury
A stepwise increase in LDL-R mRNA developed following glycerol injection. These values increased from a baseline value of 0.7 ± 0.03 to 0.82 ± 0.05 at the 3- to 4-hour time point (P < 0.001 vs. controls), and to 1.0 ± 0.03 at the 18-hour time point (P < 0.00001 vs. controls; results expressed as a ratio to the simultaneously obtained GAPDH values).
HK-2 Cell SR-B1 and ABCA-1 Protein Expression in Response to an Fe Challenge
Assessments at 4 Hours Post-Fe Challenge
As shown in Figure 3
, left panel, a marked reduction in SR-B1 expression was noted in the 4-hour Fe-challenged HK-2 cells, compared to their simultaneously processed controls. A statistically significant reduction in ABCA-1 expression at 4 hours post-FeHQ treatment was also observed (Figure 3
, right).
|
As shown in Figure 4
, the results obtained at 18 hours post-Fe treatment largely recapitulated the results seen at 4 hours, as discussed above. These consisted of statistically significant reductions in both SR-B1 (P < 0.001; left panel) and ABCA-1 (P < 0.03; right panel). Thus, when viewed together, all of the in vivo data (obtained at one time point) and all of the in vitro data (obtained at 2 time points) yielded completely congruent results: significantly reduced SR-B1 and ABCA-1 protein levels following Fe/oxidant-induced tubular injury.
|
After 4 hours of Fe treatment, a slight and insignificant increase in LDL-R protein expression was observed (FeHQ, 657 ± 34; controls 621 ± 60 density units; NS). However, as shown in Figure 5
, by 18 hours post-FeHQ treatment, a significant increase in HK-2 cell LDL-R protein was observed: a prominent band was observed at 120 kd (nonglycosylated form). A less prominent band, corresponding with the glycosylated LDL-R, was seen at 160 kd and appeared increased in the Fe-treated cells. These two bands were barely discernible in the control cells.
|
As shown in Figure 6
, left, ABCA-1 mRNA showed a progressive decline in FeHQ-challenged HK-2 cells, reaching values which were 40% of controls at the 18-hour time point. By 18 hours post Fe-induced injury, a significant decline in SR-B1 mRNA levels was also apparent. HK-2 cell LDL-R mRNA values also demonstrated time-dependent reductions following the induction of the Fe challenge. Of note, this finding was in contrast to the results observed in renal cortical samples, where LDL-R values showed stepwise increments, not decrements, following glycerol-induced injury.
|
As shown in Figure 7
, left, treating HK-2 cells with mevastatin for 18 hours caused an approximate 80% suppression in ABCA-1 mRNA levels. This is consistent with an appropriate physiological response whereby a statin-induced reduction in cellular cholesterol would be expected to induce a compensatory decrease in ABCA-1 mRNA. Statin therapy also suppressed SR-B1 mRNA (Figure 7
, middle panel). While the degree of SR-B1 mRNA suppression was quantitatively much less dramatic than it was for ABCA-1 mRNA, it, too, appears to be a physiologically appropriate response (a decrease in an FC efflux mechanism, compensating for a reduction in cholesterol levels). In contrast, statin treatment caused a 50% increase in LDL-R mRNA. Again, this is a physiologically appropriate response, given that a statin-induced block in intracellular cholesterol synthesis should theoretically lead to an increase in the LDL-R cholesterol uptake pathway. In sum, these results illustrate normal proximal tubular cell mRNA responses for a cholesterol reduction state. They also provide biological validation of the used multiplexing PCR technique for human cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While the above documented decrements in renal cortical ABCA-1/SR-B1 proteins and the LDL-R mRNA increments were all physiologically inappropriate for a cholesterol overload state, it is conceivable that these changes could have reflected nonproximal tubular cell events. Since the proximal tubule is the prime target of glycerol-induced rhabdomyolysis, further attempts were made to strengthen the above conclusions with experiments conducted on Fe-challenged cultured proximal tubular (HK-2) cells. In large part, parallel changes to those observed in renal cortex were observed; at both 4 and 18 hours after the Fe challenge, ABCA-1 and SR-B1 protein decrements were observed. Conversely, LDL-R protein was significantly elevated at the 18-hour time point, consistent with the observed increases in renal cortical LDL-R mRNA. To complement these protein results, SR-B1, ABCA-1, and LDL-R mRNA levels after HK-2 cell injury were also assessed. Both ABCA-1 and SR-B1 mRNAs were suppressed at 4 and 18 hours post cell injury, directly correlating with the reduced protein levels. Thus, the physiologically aberrant changes in SR-B1 and ABCA-1 protein expression presumably reflected, at least in part, genomic/transcriptional events. Conversely, LDL-R mRNA reductions were observed. The reason for this discrepancy in LDL-R message in HK-2 cells versus renal cortex (decreases versus increases, respectively) remains elusive at this time. However, that HK-2 cell LDL-R protein increased despite reductions in its mRNA suggests that post-transcriptional events may also be involved in injury-evoked alterations in LDL-R protein expression.
Given the panoply of changes in post-injury cholesterol homeostasis (increased HMGCR,1,8 decreased ABCA-1, decreased SR-B1, increased LDL-R), and given that each of these changes favors cell cholesterol accumulation, it would be extremely difficult to quantify the functional contribution of each to cholesterol accumulation. This is particularly true since any attempt to experimentally manipulate one pathway would secondarily impact each of the others. However, what does seem clear, at least from a teleological perspective, is that injured cells appear to be totally committed (ie, activating essentially all available pathways) to increasing, and then maintaining, the cholesterol overload state. The genomic/post genomic stimuli which might initiate and then maintain these changes once cholesterol loading has occurred remain unknown at this time. However, given that cholesterol accumulation protects tubular as well as extrarenal35,36 cells from injury, it is tempting to speculate that some highly conserved evolutionary cell "survival" pathway ultimately underlies the changes which have been observed. Noteworthy in this regard are recent observations that endotoxin-induced stress, imposed on a macrophage cell line, causes a down-regulation of SR-B1 and ABCA-1 expression.37 Thus, these results both parallel our observations in injured tubular cells, and underscore the observation that alterations in cholesterol homeostasis may, indeed, have broad-based pathophysiologic relevance in regard to cellular adaptations to stress. Finally, it should be noted that changes in cholesterol homeostasis and HMGCR activity can potentially impact protein prenylation and related signaling events.38 While previous studies from this laboratory have suggested that Fe-mediated oxidative stress does not appear to alter these pathways,8 these findings do not exclude their potential participation in alternative forms of tissue stress.38
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (RO1s: DK-38432 and DK 54200).
Accepted for publication March 18, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Kim, H. Moradi, J. Yuan, K. Norris, and N. D. Vaziri Renal mass reduction results in accumulation of lipids and dysregulation of lipid regulatory proteins in the remnant kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): F1297 - F1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kastner, M. Pohl, M. Sendeski, G. Stange, C. A. Wagner, B. Jensen, A. Patzak, S. Bachmann, and F. Theilig Effects of receptor-mediated endocytosis and tubular protein composition on volume retention in experimental glomerulonephritis Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): F902 - F911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Iwao, K. Nakajou, R. Nagai, K. Kitamura, M. Anraku, T. Maruyama, and M. Otagiri CD36 is one of important receptors promoting renal tubular injury by advanced oxidation protein products Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): F1871 - F1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, A. H. Moser, J. K. Shigenaga, C. Grunfeld, and K. R. Feingold Downregulation of liver X receptor-{alpha} in mouse kidney and HK-2 proximal tubular cells by LPS and cytokines J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 2377 - 2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Saito, N. Ishizaka, M. Hara, G. Matsuzaki, M. Sata, I. Mori, M. Ohno, and R. Nagai Lipid Accumulation and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Upregulation in the Kidneys of Rats Administered Angiotensin II Hypertension, November 1, 2005; 46(5): 1180 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wolf, U. Wenzel, K. Jablonski, M. Brundert, and F. Rinninger Angiotensin II down-regulates the SR-BI HDL receptor in proximal tubular cells Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1222 - 1227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Zager, A. C. M. Johnson, and S. Y. Hanson Proximal tubular cholesterol loading after mitochondrial, but not glycolytic, blockade Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): F1092 - F1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |