| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These distinct virus-induced pathologies in the lung can involve discrete sites of inflammation and predominance of different types of immune system cells.4-13 Respiratory syncytial virus can cause a pneumonia involving strong eosinophilic infiltrates associated with Th2-like CD4 T-cell immune responses.14,15 Complex lymph node-like clustering of lymphocytes, known as bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT), is seen during some human infections of the lung, particularly during chronic or recurrent pneumonias.16 In cases of recurrent pneumonias BALT has been reported to develop into a low-grade B-cell lymphoma.16 It is unclear which pathogens drive the induction of BALT or lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis, another term used to define this pathology.16 Unique pathologies such as bronchiolitis obliterans, a blockage of the airways with organized fibrous material and inflammatory cells, may develop during some viral and intracellular bacterial infections.17 Interestingly, enhanced BALT has been associated with stable graft function after lung transplantation, whereas bronchiolitis obliterans is strongly associated with lung transplant rejection.16,18
What is quite clear, however, is that not everyone who experiences a viral infection of the lung has comparable severity of infection or comparable pathology. These differences are thought to be related to such issues as the genetic and physiological status of the host and the dose of virus received, but recent work in animal models has indicated that the pathogenesis of viral infections in the lung may be related in part to the hosts experience with putatively unrelated pathogens. In our earlier work, we have shown that intranasal vaccinia virus (VV) infection of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV)-immune mice reactivates LCMV-specific memory CD8 T cells, which play a role in augmenting VV clearance, enhancing survival and inducing a very different immunopathology than in a naïve host.19
In the present study, we questioned whether the pathogenic response to an infection with a given virus would be altered in similar or different ways by previous immunity to different viruses, and whether immunity to a given virus would have similar effects on subsequent infections with different viruses. We examined the viral titers, cytokine response, and pathology in mice inoculated intranasally with LCMV (a small RNA arenavirus), murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV; a large DNA herpesvirus), or influenza virus (a small RNA orthomyxovirus) and later challenged with VV (a large DNA poxvirus), or in mice infected with influenza virus and later challenged with VV, LCMV, or MCMV. We chose these four viruses because they are phylogenetically unrelated and because they are naturally spread through infection of the respiratory mucosa and induce significant inflammation in the lung.5-13 LCMV and VV, which are usually not studied in respiratory models, are in nature spread via the respiratory route. VV, used for vaccination against smallpox, is a model for poxviruses, which are naturally transmitted via the respiratory tract and frequently associated with induction of pneumonia.20-22 LCMV, which induces a flu-like illness in humans, is a common pathogen, with 5 to 14% of the general population being serologically positive.23,24 All four of these viruses used here are known to induce distinctive lung pathologies in mice which are easily defined and followed.5-13 The pathological changes we observed in our study during acute infections of naïve mice with all four viruses were consistent with those observed by other investigators.5-13 VV and influenza induced potent acute, neutrophilic inflammatory responses. VV infection of the lung induced severe pulmonary edema and acute necrotizing bronchiolitis, whereas influenza virus caused severe acute inflammatory pneumonic consolidations. In contrast, LCMV and MCMV induced mild disease with chronic mononuclear infiltrates in the interstitium. Using this baseline knowledge we could then assess what effect heterologous immunity would have on lung pathology. Our results here document that the cytokine response and resulting pathology to a given virus is dramatically and uniquely altered by previous infections with distinct heterologous viruses. Notably, we also find that a history of infection with influenza virus can lead to either decreased or enhanced viral titers on challenge with heterologous viruses. Heterologous immunity also resulted in two different patterns of disease outcome dependent on the specific virus history: a change from a neutrophilic response to a lymphocytic response associated with rapid clearance of virus or a change from a mild lymphocytic response to a severe lymphocytic response associated with enhanced virus load. The implication of these studies is that the host response to viral infections in the lung is in part a function of the infection history of the host.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6 (B6, H2b) male mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and used at 2 to 18 months of age.
Viruses
LCMV, strains Armstrong and clone 13, an RNA virus in the Old World arenavirus family, was propagated in BHK21 baby hamster kidney cells.25 The WR strain of VV, a DNA virus in the poxvirus family, was propagated in L929 cells.25 MCMV, strain Smith, a DNA virus in the herpesvirus family, was extracted from salivary glands of infected BALB/c mice.25 The mouse adapted influenza A virus A/PR/8/34 (H1N1), a RNA virus in the orthomyxovirus family, was grown in the allantoic fluid of 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs (SPAFAS, Preston CT). For acute virus infections, metofane-anesthetized mice were challenged intranasally with 4 x 105 plaque-forming units (PFU) of LCMV, 400 PFU of MCMV to generate MCMV-immune mice, 105 PFU of MCMV for acute challenge, or 70 or 200 PFU of influenza virus. Various VV doses (1 x 103 to 1 x 105 PFU) were used because there was some variability in virulence among different VV stocks.
Cell Lines
American Type Culture Collection vero cells were cultured in Eagles minimal essential medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 10 mmol/L HEPES, and 10% heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 minutes) fetal bovine serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). GT-KO cells are mouse embryonic fibroblast lines cultured from
-13-galactosyltransferase (GT)-deficient transgenic mice. They were cultivated as monolayers in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, glutamine, pyruvate, and 10% fetal bovine serum (D10 medium) as described above.26
Infection Protocol
For acute infection with a single virus, metofane-anesthetized mice were intranasally inoculated with a sublethal dose of the virus. At various times after the inoculation, the lungs were harvested for histological evaluation. For other studies, metofane-anesthetized mice were immunized intranasally with a sublethal dose of one virus. After the rise and fall of the acute T-cell response, and when the immune system had returned to homeostasis (usually 6 weeks or later), the mice were challenged with the second heterologous virus. Five to 7 days after the second virus infection, the spleen, lung, and/or mediastinal lymph nodes were harvested, homogenized, and titrated in virus plaque assays, as previously described.27 In the control and LCMV-immune mice challenged with VV, natural killer cells were depleted to demonstrate that natural killer cells were not involved in the differences in virus titers early in infection. Other experiments not shown here without natural killer depletion showed similar differences between these two groups.19 In other experiments the lungs were also harvested, fixed, and sectioned for histological evaluation. To decrease the concentration of impurities in virus preparations phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was used to dilute LCMV, influenza virus, and MCMV as previously described.19,27 VV culture supernatants were purified over sucrose gradients and then diluted in PBS. Control naïve mice were sham-immunized intranasally with either PBS or PBS-diluted tissue culture media sedimented like virus over a sucrose gradient. All mice used were healthy with no evidence of any underlying disease. The immune mice were always age-matched to the control mice and housed under exactly the same pathogen-free conditions and for the same time period.
Virus Titration
A 10% homogenate of lung tissue from each individual mouse was serially diluted and titrated on the appropriate cell line to quantify the viral titers. American Type Culture Collection vero cells were used for LCMV and VV titration and GT-KO cells were used for MCMV titration. Titers were reported as the arithmetic means of log10 PFU for whole lungs that had been individually titrated from four to five mice per group.
RNase Protection Assay
Total RNA was extracted from whole lung tissue using Trizol agent 3 days after virus challenge. Detection and quantitation of a variety of murine cytokine mRNAs were accomplished with the multiprobe RNase protection assay system as per the manufacturers instructions (PharMingen, La Jolla, CA). During the 4 years these experiments were performed three different mouse cytokine multiprobe template sets were used: 1) mCK-1b containing interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-15, IL-9, IL-2, IL-3, interferon (IFN)-
, L32, and GAPDH; 2) mCK-2b containing IL-12p35, IL-12p40, IL-10, IL-1
, IL-1ß, IL-1R
, IGIF, IL-6, IFN-
, MIF, L32, and GAPDH; 3) mCK3b containing tumor necrosis factor-ß, LTß, tumor necrosis factor-
, IL-6, IFN-
, IFN-ß, transforming growth factor-ß1, transforming growth factor-ß2, transforming growth factor-ß3, MIF, L32, and GAPDH. The specific cytokine bands were identified on the basis of their individual migration patterns in comparison with the undigested probes. The bands were quantified by densitometric analysis with Image Quant densitometric software.
Lung Histological Evaluation
Lungs were harvested from mice either in the naïve state, the immune state (2.5 to 18 months after a single infection), or 5 to 7 days after an acute infection. The lungs were then fixed in 10% neutral buffered formaldehyde and paraffin embedded. Tissue sections (5 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and analyzed microscopically. Two independent pathologists blinded to the experimental status of the lung samples scored all of the lung pathology. Lung pathology was graded based on the distribution and the severity of disease from 0 to 3 (0, within normal limit; 1, 1 to 9% involvement of the lung parenchyma; 2, 10 to 49% involvement of the lung parenchyma; 3,
50% involvement of the lung parenchyma). The consistency of this scoring scheme was assessed by having these same two reviewers blindly regrade 20 of the slides 1 year later and the scoring was similar to the earlier score.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine what influence, if any, previous exposure to a heterologous virus had on protective immunity in the lung, adult C57BL/6 mice were initially infected intranasally with LCMV, MCMV, or influenza virus. More than 6 weeks after the acute response had resolved to the first virus, and when the hosts were in a resting immune state, the immune and control naïve mice were challenged with a second virus, as seen in Table 1
. Two distinct patterns emerged on how previous infections influenced viral clearance in the lung. Immunity to LCMV resulted in an 80% reduction in VV titer early in infection, a result consistent with our previous observations.19
Similarly, previous infection with MCMV and influenza virus resulted in reduced VV titers (68% and 84%, respectively) (Table 1A)
. This protective effect lasted for long periods of time after the original virus infection because mice either 12 or 30 weeks after LCMV infection and 6 or 12 weeks after influenza infection were equally efficient at resisting VV challenge.
|
The Specific Heterologous Virus Infection Sequence Determines the Cytokine Profile
We questioned whether previous immunity to heterologous viruses could mediate changes in early cytokine responses and whether the cytokine profile differed during the protective and detrimental effects of heterologous immunity. The lungs of LCMV-immune mice early after VV challenge or of influenza virus-immune mice early after VV or MCMV challenge were assessed for their cytokine mRNA levels by RNase protection assays (Figure 1)
. We had previously shown that LCMV-specific memory CD8 T cells produce enhanced levels of the Th1-type cytokine, IFN-
, on VV infection and that IFN-
was important in mediating protective immunity against VV.19
In the present study our results also show that at 3 days after VV infection in LCMV-immune mice lungs there were fourfold higher levels of IFN-
mRNA (Figure 1a)
. At the same time, on VV challenge there was also a 50% reduction in the mRNA levels of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-6, in the LCMV-immune mouse lungs as compared to the controls. In one experiment we examined levels of the Th2-type cytokines, IL-4 and IL-5, and there was little change in LCMV-immune mouse lungs compared to controls (relative level of IL-4: control, 0.03 ± 0.001; LCMV-immune, 0.026 ± 0.002; relative level of IL-5: control, 0.03 ± 0.003; LCMV-immune, 0.02 ± 0.002; n = 3 mice/group; cytokine template set mCK-1b).
|
mRNA expression in the lungs at day 3 after VV infection in influenza virus-immune mice as compared to VV-infected controls (Figure 1b)
A very different cytokine profile was observed in influenza virus-immune mouse lungs challenged with MCMV, in which previous immunity had a negative impact on clearance of the second virus. There was a dramatic, 12-fold increase in IFN-
mRNA level when compared to control mice 3 days after MCMV challenge (Figure 1c)
. This was accompanied with a 2.2-fold increase in tumor necrosis factor-
, a second Th1-type cytokine (relative level: control, 0.5 ± 0.1; influenza virus-immune, 1.1 ± 0.3, P = 0.08; n = 2 mice/group; data from one of two similar experiments). Unlike the influenza virus or LCMV-immune mice challenged with VV, the MCMV-infected influenza virus-immune mice had significantly increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including 11-fold, fourfold, and fourfold increases in IL-6, IL-1ß, and IL-12p40, respectively (Figure 1c)
. Interestingly, in three separate experiments there were no measurable levels of Th2-type cytokine IL-4 or IL-5 mRNA (cytokine template set mCK-1b) in the lung of either nonimmune or influenza virus-immune mice challenged with MCMV.
Distinctive Lung Immunopathology during Acute Virus Infection of Nonimmune Mice
To examine whether previous infections with heterologous viruses could influence lung pathology on subsequent infections, we needed to document baseline lung pathology during acute infection in nonimmune mice. Each acute virus infection in naive mice induced distinct pathologies in the lung that returned to essentially normal architecture with minimal changes in the resting immune state (Figure 2
, Tables 2 and 3
). Figure 2a
shows a naïve mouse lung section, characterized by clean and open bronchioles, thin-walled alveoli, normal vasculature, and flat pleura. Acute LCMV or MCMV infections induced relatively mild lung disease with predominantly mild mixed mononuclear (MN) (macrophages and lymphocytes) interstitial infiltrates (Figure 2, b and c
; Table 3
). Acute LCMV infection induced mild to moderate transient BALT, characterized as nodules of lymphoid tissue in the bronchial lamina propria near the branch points of an airway or between the bronchus and an artery.28
Although present in the normal mouse lung, BALT is not usually visible but can be induced by infection (Figure 2b
and Table 3
). Both human CMV (HCMV) and MCMV are known to infect endothelial cells.29
Therefore, it was not surprising to observe vasculitis and endothelial activation on infection with MCMV (Table 3)
.
|
|
|
During acute VV infection, the mouse lungs developed necrotizing bronchiolitis, defined by the presence of necrotic bronchiolar epithelium with PMNs and debris, and severe alveolar edema (Figure 2i
, Figure3a
, and Table 2
). This accumulation of extravascular fluid in the air spaces could significantly disturb gas exchange and contribute to the mortality observed with VV infection.19
In addition, the VV-infected mouse lungs mainly showed acute, mixed inflammatory infiltrates with PMN and MN cells present in the peribronchial areas and interstitium, as well as in the perivascular areas (as shown at higher magnifications in Figure 3, a and b
, and Table 2
). Enhanced BALT could develop but only later, more than 15 days after VV infection (not shown). Mild BALT could persist for at least 3 months in the VV-immune mouse lung (Figure 2e)
.
|
When the LCMV-, MCMV-, or influenza virus-immune mice were challenged with VV, the pathology varied dramatically not only from the VV-infected controls but also from each other (Figures 2 and 3)
. One of the main lesions of acute VV infection, necrotizing bronchiolitis, was present in the lungs of all of the VV-infected groups: controls, LCMV-, MCMV-, or influenza virus-immune mice (Figure 3; b, e, and g
; and Table 2
). However, compared to controls, the lungs of LCMV-immune mice challenged with VV showed very little alveolar edema but had a very prominent lymphocytic response instead of an acute inflammatory response. Most strikingly, the LCMV-immune mouse lungs had very prominent BALT as early as 5 and 7 days after VV infection (Figure 2j
; Figure 3, c and d
; and Table 2
). Also prominent was chronic MN infiltration (CMI), with lymphocytes and macrophages present in the interstitium and pleura. In addition, the LCMV-immune lungs showed perivascular lymphocytic cuffing, as defined by a significant lymphocyte accumulation around the vessels (Figure 2j
; Figure 3, c and d
; and Table 2
). Interestingly, by day 7 of VV infection, LCMV-immune mouse lungs also displayed the less common pathology of bronchiolitis obliterans, showing obstruction of bronchioles by plugs of fibrin and inflammatory cells (Figure 3, c and d
; and Table 2
).
On VV challenge the lungs of MCMV- or influenza virus-immune mice were like those of LCMV-immune mice, showing a prominent chronic mononuclear (macrophages and lymphocytes) response (Figure 2, k and l
; Figure 3, e and g
; and Table 2
). Compared to LCMV-immune mice, both MCMV- or influenza virus-immune mice had a greater accumulation of lymphocytes and other mononuclear cells around the vessels, ie, tufting and cuffing. However, there was less of an increase in BALT than was observed in LCMV-immune mice (Figure 2, j, k, and l
; Figure 3, c, e, g
; and Table 2
). Alveolar edema was decreased in MCMV-, influenza virus-, and LCMV-immune mice as compared to controls, but immunity to LCMV had the greatest impact on lessening edema (Table 2)
. The major difference between influenza virus-immune mice and MCMV-immune mice on VV challenge was the presence of mild residual areas of consolidation in VV-infected influenza virus-immune mouse lungs, whereas VV-infected MCMV-immune mouse lungs demonstrated greater endothelial activation (Table 2)
.
Clearly, previous immunity to LCMV, MCMV, or influenza virus led to significant alterations in VV-induced immunopathology in almost all of the lung compartments. Although the common feature of this altered pathology was an enhanced chronic response (lymphocytes and macrophages), immunity to each virus resulted in these cells being distributed differently in various lung compartments (Table 2
and Figure 3
). Previous immunity to each virus also led to some unique features with the subsequent acute VV infection, such as endothelial activation in MCMV-immune mice and bronchiolitis obliterans in LCMV-immune mice.
Enhanced Chronic Mononuclear (Macrophages and Lymphocytes) Infiltrates in Acute LCMV- or MCMV-Infected Lungs of Influenza Virus-Immune Mice
Because immunity to influenza virus enhanced MCMV and LCMV titers in the lung, we questioned what influence immunity to influenza virus had on lung pathology. The most prominent feature of acute influenza virus infection was severe pneumonic consolidation mostly with PMNs (Figure 4a
; Figure 5, a and b
; and Table 3
). When this resolved, the mouse lung was left with some minimal residual areas of consolidation infiltrated with chronic mononuclear cells as long as 24 months after infection (Figure 4b
; Figure 5, c and d
; and Table 3
).
|
|
Immunity to influenza virus had a similar effect on the immunopathology in response to another virus, LCMV, although not as striking as the effect on the MCMV response. Acute infection with LCMV in a control mouse results predominantly in a mild interstitial mononuclear infiltrate (Figure 4c
and Table 3
). In influenza virus-immune mice LCMV infection induced an increase in the accumulation of lymphocytes and other mononuclear cells especially around airways and vessels. There was also some enhancement of the residual chronic mononuclear consolidation already present in mild form in influenza virus-immune mice lungs (Figure 4d
and Table 3
). Thus, previous immunity to influenza virus resulted in a marked increase of the usually mild lymphocytic and mononuclear infiltration occurring on LCMV or MCMV infection.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
,19
as VV is known to be very sensitive to IFN-
.31
Our earlier work19
would suggest that IFN-
also is playing an important role in the accumulation of mononuclear cells instead of neutrophils in the lungs of these immune mice. However, the pattern of the lymphocyte and macrophage accumulation was noticeably different between the groups, with greater amounts of BALT surrounding the airways in LCMV-immune mice and greater amounts of perivascular tufting and cuffing in MCMV- and influenza virus-immune mice. On VV challenge, the LCMV-immune mice developed bronchiolitis obliterans, the influenza virus-immune mice had mild residual areas of consolidation, whereas the MCMV-immune mouse lungs demonstrated endothelial activation (Table 4)
Interestingly, although immunity to influenza virus protected against VV, it enhanced MCMV or LCMV virus titers early in infection. Both VV and MCMV induced high levels of IFN-
early after infection of influenza virus-immune mice, but MCMV also increased levels of IL-1ß, a proinflammatory cytokine, and IL-6, which is both a Th2 and proinflammatory cytokine. In contrast, VV-challenged influenza virus-immune mice had decreased levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1ß. IFN-
is known to enhance IL-1 and IL-6 production by macrophages and other mononuclear cells during a delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction, which is classically mediated by a potent CD4 T-cell response.32
Potentially, IFN-
produced by heterologous memory T cells may result in an overwhelming DTH-like response in the lung. It is possible that the enhanced chronic mononuclear infiltration of the lung seen in MCMV or LCMV infections in influenza virus-immune mice represents a form of overwhelming CD4-mediated DTH-like response instead of a potent Th1-type CD8 T-cell response, and perhaps this type of environment may be detrimental to viral clearance (Table 4)
. Also, the massive induction of IL-6, a Th2 cytokine important in the differentiation of CD4 T cells into Th2 cells in the presence of IL-4 and the differentiation of B cells into plasma cells,32
may play a role in the negative outcome to MCMV in mice immune to influenza virus. Possibly, MCMV infection in influenza-immune mice may drive a CD4 Th2 type response and/or potent production of high-antibody levels early in infection, instead of the purely Th1-type response observed on VV infection of influenza virus-immune or LCMV-immune mice. The possibility that an early potent Th2 rather than a Th1 response may be detrimental to clearance of virus in this model needs investigation. The enhanced endothelial activation and vasculitis that is observed in influenza virus-immune mice challenged with MCMV may be enhanced by the increased levels of IL-1ß, which is also an important mediator of immune complex formation, an essential mechanism in induction of vasculitis.33
However, it is also possible that the reverse is true and that the increased virus load is driving the increase in both of these proinflammatory cytokines.
There are several possible mechanisms that could result in the enhancement of MCMV and LCMV replication in influenza virus-immune mice. Immune enhancement of virus replication, caused by increased uptake of antibody-coated virus by Fc
R+ cells, has been observed in some viral infections.34-36
This mechanism could occur if there were early high levels of virus-specific antibodies, which could be driven by the high levels of IL-6 demonstrated in influenza virus-immune mice. Several cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-
, IL-1, and IFN-
, also augment CMV replication in humans, rats, and mice.37-42
These cytokines can transcriptionally activate nuclear factor-
B,43,44
which has been shown to activate the CMV enhancer through a viral transactivator.45
It is therefore possible that these elevated cytokines contributed to the enhanced MCMV replication. Furthermore, both MCMV46,47
and LCMV (clone 13)48
replicate well in macrophages. It is conceivable that the massive infiltration with mononuclear cells (lymphocytes and macrophages) in MCMV- or LCMV-infected influenza virus-immune lungs might support enhanced replication of these viruses.
Several features of the lung pathology observed in the present study have implications for our understanding of immune-mediated diseases in the human lung. LCMV-immune mice infected with VV developed two interesting pathologies, enhanced BALT and bronchiolitis obliterans. In humans and mice BALT is not a constitutive structure of the lung, but it can be initiated and vigorously expanded on infection to become a highly integrated mucosal immune system along the respiratory tract.16,28 It is not clear what the significance of enhanced BALT means in humans. Generally, increased BALT is observed in children, in adults who smoke, in some individuals with autoimmune diseases, and in very athletic cross-country skiers.16 In humans, the etiology of bronchiolitis obliterans17 is also not well understood, but is thought to be immune-mediated. Bronchiolitis obliterans is known to occur in association with viral and intracellular bacterial infections17 as well as being the most significant cause of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation,18 in which it is strongly associated with acute rejection.49 MCMV-infected influenza virus-immune mice also developed another interesting pathology, enhanced bronchiolization. Bronchiolization is a repair process whereby the alveolar walls are lined by cells resembling bronchiolar epithelium; it can be observed after a variety of insults such as respiratory infection, exposure to chemical irritants, and even circulatory disturbances involving the lung.30 If such modified alveolar tissues are exposed to carcinogens, bronchiolar carcinoma could develop, and the influence of pathogenic viruses on cancers has been indicated.50 We would like to suggest that an individuals history of previous infections may influence whether they develop these conditions. Further studies using the heterologous virus model in mice may lead to new insights on these poorly understood human conditions.
These studies demonstrate that heterologous immunity may have a dramatic impact on the subsequent outcome of infections, but the mechanisms behind this phenomenon still need to be clarified. Previous studies with LCMV-immune mice challenged with VV or Pichinde virus suggested that memory CD8 T cells play an important role during heterologous infections.19,25,27,51-54 LCMV-specific memory CD8 T cells can be reactivated by heterologous viruses in a cross-reactive manner25 and we have identified three potentially cross-reactive VV peptides recognized by LCMV-specific CD8 T cells. For the other sequences of virus infections described in this article we have yet to define the specific mechanisms involved in mediating the changes observed in disease outcome, but the differences observed in T-cell cytokines are consistent with memory T cells being involved.
Other studies support the concept that heterologous immunity may be of importance in the pathogenesis of viral infections. One study showed that Sendai virus-immune mice challenged with influenza virus had 90% lower influenza virus titers in their lungs than nonimmune controls, although this was not discussed by the authors.55 Moreover, influenza virus-infected Sendai virus-immune mice had altered pathology, with an increase in persistent alveolitis and hydroxyproline-associated collagen deposition 60 days after the influenza virus infection. In a second study, mice infected with influenza virus before vaccination with VVrespiratory syncytial virus G protein developed a Th1-type response on respiratory syncytial virus challenge instead of the expected Th2 response and cleared respiratory syncytial virus without developing severe eosinophilia.15,56 Thus, heterologous memory T cells may affect the Th1 or Th2 bias of subsequent infections. For instance, mice immunized with Mycobacterium bovis-bacillus Calmette-Guerin, which induces a strong Th1 response, had a suppressed Th2 response and considerably reduced lung eosinophilia when exposed to an allergen.57
These experimental models imply that heterologous immunity in humans might be a determining factor between a clinical and subclinical, or between a lethal and nonlethal infection. For instance, it is possible that cross-reactive memory T-cell responses to influenza virus variants can become pathogenic to an immune human population after the viruses develop mutations in, or reassortments of, their HA gene, which makes them resistant to antibody-mediated neutralization.58,59 Many viruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus, and varicella-zoster virus, cause much more severe infections in teenagers and young adults than they do in younger children.60,61 Such a difference may be because of immunopathology occurring as a consequence of the reactivation of memory cells, which may be more diverse and prominent in a more immunologically mature individual.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the National Institutes of Health (research grants AR-35506 and CA-34461 to R. M. W., AI-46578 to L. K. S., and supported in part by Center Grant DK32520 to I. J.).
The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health.
Accepted for publication June 18, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Goulding, R. Snelgrove, J. Saldana, A. Didierlaurent, M. Cavanagh, E. Gwyer, J. Wales, E. L. Wissinger, and T. Hussell Respiratory Infections: Do We Ever Recover? Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2007; 4(8): 618 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cornberg, B. S. Sheridan, F. M. Saccoccio, M. A. Brehm, and L. K. Selin Protection against Vaccinia Virus Challenge by CD8 Memory T Cells Resolved by Molecular Mimicry J. Virol., January 15, 2007; 81(2): 934 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Mora, C. R. Woods, A. Garcia, J. Xu, M. Rojas, S. H. Speck, J. Roman, K. L. Brigham, and A. A. Stecenko Lung infection with {gamma}-herpesvirus induces progressive pulmonary fibrosis in Th2-biased mice Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): L711 - L721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Rehermann and E.-C. Shin Private aspects of heterologous immunity J. Exp. Med., March 7, 2005; 201(5): 667 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Vet. Pathol., January 1, 2004; 41(1): 88 - 89. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||