| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Induces Fractalkine Expression Preferentially in Arterial Endothelial Cells and Mithramycin A Suppresses TNF-
-Induced Fractalkine Expression




From the Biomedical Research Center and Department of Biological Sciences,* Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon; the Department of Internal Medicine,
Keimyung University School of Medicine, Taegu; and the Department of Internal Medicine,
Chonbuk National University Medical School, Chonju, Korea
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced chemokine. The molecule is tethered to cells that express it and produces strong and direct adhesion to leukocytes expressing fractalkine receptor. However, the potential mechanism and significance of TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression in vascular endothelial cells are poorly understood. Here we show that in primary cultured endothelial cells TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression is mediated mainly through phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase activation and nuclear factor (NF)-
B mediated transcriptional activation, along with GC-rich DNA-binding protein-mediated transcription. Interestingly, GC-rich DNA-binding protein inhibitors, mithramycin A and chromomycin A3, strongly suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression, possibly through inhibition of transcriptional activities by NF-
B and Sp1. In fact, direct inhibition of NF-
B and Sp1 bindings by decoy oligonucleotides suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression. Histologically, TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression was observed markedly in arterial and capillary endothelial cells, endocardium, and endothelium of intestinal villi, and slightly in venous endothelial cells, but not at all in lymphatic endothelial cells of intestine. Mithramycin A markedly suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression in vivo. These results indicate that TNF-
-stimulated fractalkine expression could act as part of arterial endothelial adhesion to leukocytes and monocytes during inflammation and atherosclerosis. NF-
B and Sp1 inhibitors such as mithramycin A may provide a pharmacological approach to suppressing these processes.
Among more than 50 known chemokines, fractalkine is the sole member of the CX3C family, and has unique structural and functional attributes.6,7 It is a large protein of 373 amino acids containing multiple domains.6,7 In its extracellular domain, the first 76 amino acids of fractalkine comprise a chemokine domain with a novel arrangement of cysteine residues (CysXaaXaaXaaCys), followed by an extended mucin-like stalk, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain of 37 amino acids.6,7 Thus, it is expressed as a transmembrane molecule on the cell surface. Fractalkine binding to its seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptor, CX3CR1, triggers signaling, but also directly mediates cell adhesion.8 In fact, fractalkine binds CX3CR1 rapidly and firmly, which leads to tethering and arrest of leukocytes under conditions of normal blood flow even in the absence of CX3CR1 signaling.8,9 CX3CR1 is also expressed on subsets of peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and CD16+ monocytes.8,10,11 Furthermore, CX3CR1 defines circulating effector-killer lymphocytes and modulates trafficking.12 These observations suggest that fractalkine and CX3CR1 fulfill special roles in tethering and rolling, arrest, stable adhesion, and transendothelial migration of CX3CR1-leukocytes at sites of fractalkine-expressing endothelium.
Similar to other cytokines, fractalkine expression is markedly induced by inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
, interleukin-1, and interferon-
in primary cultured endothelial cells.13,14
Activation of nuclear factor (NF)-
B could play a central role in inflammatory cytokine-induced fractalkine expression at the transcriptional level.14
However, the signaling mechanisms by which inflammatory cytokines induce fractalkine mRNA expression are not well known. Given that different endothelia show heterogeneity in structural and functional characteristics,15
inflammatory reactions at different sites could be heterogeneous.16
However, the localization and regulation of fractalkine expression by different endothelia during inflammation is not well known. Therefore, the goals of the present study were to determine the second messenger/transcriptional mechanisms leading to fractalkine expression by TNF-
, and the localization and regulation of fractalkine expression by TNF-
.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recombinant human TNF-
, soluble fractalkine, and anti-fractalkine antibodies were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI 3'-kinase) inhibitor wortmannin was purchased from RBI, Inc. ADP ribosylation factor inhibitor brefeldin-A and MEK 1/2 inhibitor PD98059 were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U73122 was purchased from Biomol Research Laboratory (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Sphingosine kinase inhibitor N,N-dimethylsphingosine was purchased from ICN Pharmaceuticals (Costa Mesa, CA). NF-
B inhibitor pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate and protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine chloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Media, sera, and most other biochemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, unless otherwise specified. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were prepared from human umbilical cords by collagenase digestion as previously described.17
The endothelial identity of the cultures was confirmed by the presence of factor VIII detected by immunofluorescence. HUVECs were maintained in M-199 medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal bovine serum at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The primary cultured cells used in this study were between passages 2 and 4.
RNase Protection Assay (RPA)
The partial cDNA of human fractalkine (nucleotides 482 to 893, GenBank accession NM002996) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and subcloned into pBluescript II KS+ (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). After linearizing with EcoRI, 32P-labeled anti-sense RNA probes were synthesized by in vitro transcription using T7 polymerase (Ambion Maxiscript kit; Ambion, Austin, TX) and gel purified. RPA was performed on total RNAs using the Ambion RPA kit. An anti-sense RNA probe of human cyclophilin (nucleotides 135 to 239, GenBank accession X52856) was used as an internal control for RNA quantification.
Western Blot Analysis
For Western blot analysis, samples were mixed with sample buffer, boiled for 10 minutes, separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions, and electroblotted to nitrocellulose membranes. The nitrocellulose membranes were blocked by incubation in blocking buffer, incubated with anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, washed, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Signals were visualized by chemiluminescent detection according to the manufacturers protocol (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK). The membrane was reblotted with anti-actin antibody to verify equal loading of protein in each lane.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)
EMSA for NF-
B proteins was performed as previously described.18
Briefly, the cells were lysed in a hypotonic buffer (10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L KCl, 0.5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 0.5 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride) containing 0.6% NP-40 and microfuged at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes. The pellet was lysed in 15 µl of a high-salt buffer (20 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.9, 420 mmol/L NaCl, 25% glycerol, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.5 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mmol/L dithiothreitol) for 20 minutes on ice. Seventy-five µl of storage buffer (20 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.9, 100 mmol/L NaCl, 20% glycerol, 0.2 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.5 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mmol/L dithiothreitol) was added, agitated for 10 seconds by vortexing, and then microfuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 minutes. Nuclear extracts (10 µg) were incubated with
20,000 cpm of 32P-labeled NF-
B binding site oligomer 5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3' (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for 30 minutes at 20°C. EMSA for SP1 protein was performed with biotin-labeled SP1 binding site oligomer 5'-GATCCGGTCCCCCACCATCCCCCGCCATTTCCA and signals were detected by chemiluminescence imaging according to the manufacturers protocol (EMSA Gel-Shift kit; Panomics, Redwood City, CA).
Construction of Decoy Oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) for Sp1 and NF-
B
The sequences of dumbbell-shaped, decoy ODN against the NF-
B binding site (NF-DO), its mismatched NF-
B decoy ODN (MNF-DO), against the Sp-1 binding site (SP-DO) and mismatched SP-1 decoy ODN (MSP-DO) are constructed as previously described19
as follows (with consensus sequences underlined): NF-DO, 5'-GGATCCCGG-GGACTTTCCCGCACAAAAGTGCGGGAAAGTCCCCG-3'; MNF-DO, 5'GGATCCCTATAACTTTCCCGCACAA-AAGTGCGGGAAAGTTATAG-3'; SP-DO, 5'-GGGGCTA-GTTTTCTAGCCCCGCCCCGCTCGTTTTCGAGCGGGG-C-3'; MSP-DO, 5'-ATGGCTAGTTTTCTAGCCATGCCA-TGCTCGTTTTCGAGCATGGC-3'. Decoy ODNs were annealed for 2 hours with a steady temperature descent from 80°C to 25°C. T4 DNA ligase (1 U) was added to the mixture, followed by incubation for 24 hours at 16°C to generate a covalently ligated dumbbell-shaped decoy ODN molecule. Each decoy ODN comprises two loops and one stem containing two NF-
B or one Sp1 consensus sequence in tandem. The stability and cellular uptake of the ODNs were similar to those previously described.19
In Vitro Decoy ODN Transfer
HUVECs were fed with fresh culture medium the day before the decoy ODN was added and washed twice with Opti-MEM (Gibco Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) immediately before the experiment. HUVECs were transfected with decoy ODN (100 nmol/L) combined with LipofectAMINE 2000 (molar ratio; DNA:lipid = 1:3) (Gibco Invitrogen Corp.). The decoy ODN:lipid mixture was added dropwise to cells, according to the manufacturers instructions. HUVECs were incubated at 37°C for 5 hours. After the addition of fresh medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, cells were maintained in a CO2 incubator until use. Transfection efficiency was
72 to 83% as measured by fluorescence-labeled decoy ODN. Addition of NF-DO (100 nmol/L) or SP-DO (100 nmol/L) produced
60 to 70% inhibition in TNF-
(10 ng/ml)-induced NF-
B or Sp1 activity, whereas MNF-DO (100 nmol/L) or MSP-DO (100 nmol/L) did not produce any changes in the TNF-
-induced NF-
B or Sp1 activity. At 100 nmol/L, none of the four ODNs alone produced any changes in basal NF-
B or Sp1 activity.
Animal Experiments
Inbred male Sprague-Dawley rats (150 to 200 g) were obtained from Daehan Experimental Animal Center (Daejeon, Korea) and were maintained on standard laboratory chow and water ad libitum. The rats (180 to 220 g) were divided into three groups: vehicle (0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide) (n = 6), TNF-
(10 µg/kg) (n = 6), and TNF-
(10 µg/kg) plus mithramycin A (50 µg/kg/day) (n = 6). Control buffer and TNF-
were injected intravenously through the tail vein. The vehicle (total volume, 100 µl) or mithramycin A was injected intravenously through the tail vein once per day for 3 days before TNF-
administration. At 12 hours after injection of vehicle or TNF-
, rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (30 mg/kg), and subsequently sacrificed by cervical dislocation. All animal studies were reviewed and approved by the animal care and use committee of the Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Fractalkine Expression
After sacrifice, the hearts and small intestines (jejunums) were quickly excised, rinsed with PBS, and frozen in OCT in methyl-butane on dry ice. Frozen tissue blocks were sectioned at 10 µm and 8 to 12 sections of heart or jejunum from each mouse were incubated with anti-fractalkine antibody at 4°C overnight. Signals were visualized with the Cell and Tissue Staining Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The sections were counterstained with Meyers hematoxylin and were viewed and photographed with an Axioskope2 plus microscope (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) equipped with color charge-coupled device camera (ProgResC14; Jenoptik, Jena, Germany) and monitor. Fractalkine expression was semiquantitated by grading the degree of immunostaining (very strong = 5, strong = 4, moderate = 3, weak = 2, none = 1). Three to five endothelial portions of each section were graded. Tissues were examined from several tissues of the heart (artery, vein, endocardium, and cardiac valves) and jejunum (artery, vein, and villous endothelium). Two independent, blinded investigators graded the expression by the charge-coupled device camera. Interinvestigator variation was <5%.
Densitometric Analyses and Statistics
All signals were visualized and analyzed by densitometric scanning (LAS-1000; Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was tested using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased Expression of Fractalkine mRNA and Protein in HUVECs
Similar to previous reports,13,14
addition of TNF-
(10 ng/ml) markedly increased the expression of fractalkine mRNA in a time-dependent manner (Figure 1A)
. The higher expression levels continued to 24 hours. Addition of TNF-
increased the fractalkine mRNA at 4 hours in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1B)
. Addition of TNF-
(10 ng/ml) maximally increased expression of fractalkine protein at 12 hours, and the level continued to be higher than control for up to 24 hours (Figure 1C)
. The maximum mean increase in fractalkine was 3.7-fold.
|
-Stimulated Expression of Fractalkine mRNA
To examine the second messenger and transcriptional mechanisms leading to induction of fractalkine by TNF-
, various kinase inhibitors and transcription factor inhibitors were added to TNF-
(10 ng/ml)-treated HUVECs. NF-
B inhibitor pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (50 µg/ml) suppressed TNF-
-induced expression of fractalkine mRNA. Co-treatment with PI 3'-kinase inhibitor wortmannin (30 nmol/L) also suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression. However, ADP ribosylation factor inhibitor brefeldin-A (50 µg/ml), MEK 1/2 inhibitor PD98059 (50 µmol/L), PLC inhibitor U73122 (1 µmol/L), sphingosine kinase inhibitor N,N-dimethylsphingosine (5 µmol/L), and protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine chloride (5 µmol/L) did not produce any changes (Figure 2)
. Interestingly, GC-rich DNA-binding protein inhibitor mithramycin A (500 nmol/L) completely suppressed TNF-
-induced expression of fractalkine mRNA (Figure 2)
. These results suggested that TNF-
-stimulated expression of fractalkine might be mediated mainly through activation of NF-
B and PI 3'-kinase pathways, along with GC-rich DNA binding protein-mediated transcription. The process seems to be independent of the MEK/ERK, PLC, and protein kinase C pathways.
|
-Induced Expression of Fractalkine mRNA
We further characterized the effect of mithramycin A on TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression. Mithramycin A suppressed TNF-
-induced expression of fractalkine mRNA in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3A)
. Addition of mithramycin A (10 nmol/L) suppressed
30 to 40% of TNF-
-induced expression of fractalkine mRNA, whereas addition of mithramycin A (100, 500, and 1000 nmol/L) almost completely suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression. Chromomycin A3 (10 nmol/L), a structural analog of mithramycin A, suppressed TNF-
-induced expression of fractalkine mRNA in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3B)
. Addition of chromomycin A3 (10 nmol/L) suppressed
20 to 30% of TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression, whereas addition of chromomycin A3 (100, 500, and 1000 nmol/L) almost completely suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression. These data suggest that mithramycin A and chromomycin A3 are potential inhibitors of TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression, possibly by inhibiting the binding of GC-rich DNA-binding proteins to the promoter of the fractalkine gene. To assess any possible toxicity of mithramycin A to HUVECs, we performed careful microscopic observation of the cells, an apoptosis assay by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling, and a DNA synthesis assay by [3H]-thymidine incorporation. In the range from 0.1 to 30 nmol/L, mithramycin A exposure for 24 hours did not produce any notable effects on HUVECs. However, at concentrations of 100, 300, and 1000 nmol/L, mithramycin A for 24 hours induced apoptosis in
2.2%, 3.1%, and 4.7% of cells and reduced DNA synthesis
18%, 37%, and 48%, respectively. Thus, mithramycin A at less than 30 nmol/L is not toxic, whereas concentrations of mithramycin A greater than 100 nmol/L may have toxic effects with significant reduction of DNA synthesis and induction of apoptosis.
|
-Induced Sp1 and NF-
B Activities
Because Sp1 is a representative GC-rich DNA-binding protein and NF-
B is involved in TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression, we examined the effect of mithramycin A on Sp1 and NF-
B activities using EMSA. EMSA analyses revealed increased Sp1 and NF-
B (p65/p50) binding to the nuclear extracts of TNF-
(10 ng/ml)-stimulated HUVECs, whereas mithramycin A (100 nmol/L) alone only slightly suppressed the Sp1 and NF-
B (p65/p50) binding (Figure 4, A and B)
. Co-treatment with TNF-
and mithramycin A (10 nmol/L or100 nmol/L) suppressed the Sp1 and NF-
B (p65/p50) binding in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4, A and B)
. Co-treatment with TNF-
and chromomycin A3 (10 nmol/L or 100 nmol/L) produced similar results (data not shown). These data suggest that mithramycin A and chromomycin A3 suppressed the TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression mainly through suppression of Sp1 and NF-
B activities in endothelial cells. To examine whether fractalkine mRNA expression is directly regulated by NF-
B and Sp1, double-stranded cis-element decoy ODNs for NF-
B- or Sp1-binding site was introduced into HUVECs. Matched decoy ODNs of NF-
B or Sp1 (NF-DO or SP-DO), significantly suppressed TNF-
(10 ng/ml)-induced fractalkine mRNA expression, whereas mismatched decoy ODNs (MNF-DO or MSP-DO) did not produce any changes in the TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression (Figure 4C)
. At the concentration used (100 nmol/L), none of the ODNs alone produced any changes in basal fractalkine mRNA expression (Figure 4C)
. Thus, fractalkine mRNA expression may be directly regulated by NF-
B and Sp1 in endothelial cells.
|
-Induced Fractalkine Expression in Cardiac Endothelial Cells
We also examined the effect of TNF-
on fractalkine expression in rat heart using immunohistochemistry. We observed endogenous expression of fractalkine mainly in arterial endothelial cells, but almost no expression of fractalkine in capillary endothelial cells, venous endothelial cells, endocardium, myocardium, pericardium, or cardiac valves in normal adult rat (Figure 5)
. Intravenous injection of TNF-
(10 µg/kg) increased fractalkine expression markedly at 12 hours in arterial endothelial cells, capillary endothelial cell, endocardium, endocardial surface of cardiac valves, but not in venous endothelial cells, myocardial cells, or pericardium (Figures 5 and 7)
. These data suggest that TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression is endothelial cell-specific. Pretreatment with mithramycin A (50 µg/kg/day for 3 days) dramatically suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression in arterial and capillary endothelial cells, endocardium, and cardiac valves (Figures 5 and 7)
.
|
-Induced Fractalkine Expression in Small Intestinal Endothelial Cells
We further examined the effect of TNF-
on fractalkine expression in rat small intestine using immunohistochemistry. We observed endogenous expression of fractalkine mainly in arterial endothelial cells, but only slight or almost no expression of fractalkine in villous endothelial, venous, and lymphatic endothelial cells, and epithelial cells (Figure 6)
. Intravenous injection of TNF-
(10 µg/kg) increased fractalkine expression markedly at 12 hours in arterial arteriolar endothelial cells and villous endothelium, slightly in venous endothelial cells, but not in lymphatic endothelial cells and epithelial cells (Figures 6 and 7)
. These data suggest that TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression is endothelial cell-specific. Pretreatment with mithramycin A (50 µg/kg/day for 3 days) dramatically suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression in arterial endothelial cells and villous endothelium (Figures 6 and 7)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-stimulated expression of fractalkine occurs mainly through activation of NF-
B and PI 3'-kinase pathways, along with GC-rich DNA-binding protein-mediated transcription. The process seems to be independent of the MEK/ERK, PLC, and protein kinase C pathways. Therefore, inhibitors that suppress the activities in PI 3'-kinase, NF-
B, and GC-rich DNA-binding protein-mediated transcription could have the potential to suppress fractalkine expression and fractalkine-mediated vascular inflammation.
Notably, our results indicate that inhibitors of GC-rich DNA-binding protein-mediated transcription, mithramycin A and chromomycin A3, are strong inhibitors of TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression in the nanomolar range. Our EMSA suggests that this inhibition may possibly occur through suppression of the binding of GC-rich DNA binding proteins and NF-
B on the fractalkine gene promoter. Mithramycin A and chromomycin A3 are isolated from Streptomyces griseus and Streptomyces plicatus, respectively.22
Structurally, they have the same chromophore with differences in the nature of the sugar residues connected on either side of the aglycone ring via O-glycosidic linkages.23
They bind to double-stranded DNA at the minor groove with specificity for GC bp, thereby blocking the template activity of DNA during transcription by RNA polymerases.24
Thus, mithramycin A and chromomycin A3 are known to bind GC-rich promoters, such as Sp1- and Egr-1-binding sites, and thus inhibit their activation of gene transcription. Our EMSA indicated that mithramycin A suppressed not only Sp1 binding but also NF-
B binding to the DNA of TNF-
-stimulated endothelial cells. Therefore, it is possible that mithramycin A suppresses TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression through suppression of NF-
B and GC-rich DNA-binding proteins such as Sp1 and Egr-1. Indeed, direct inhibition of NF-
B and Sp1 through introduction of specific decoys suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine mRNA expression. Thus, fractalkine mRNA expression may be directly regulated by NF-
B and Sp1 in endothelial cells. Given that both Sp1 and Egr1 nuclear activator proteins are involved in vascular injury and inflammation,25
mithramycin A could be useful for preventing vascular injury and inflammation. In the future, it will be important to determine how mithramycin A and chromomycin A3 suppress NF-
B activity in endothelial cells. Moreover, identification and characterization of the fractalkine promoter is warranted for clarifying the regulation of fractalkine expression.
Recruitment of circulating leukocytes to the arterial intima contributes to the formation of atherosclerotic lesions.26
Leukocyte emigration from blood into tissues is mediated by multiple adhesion molecules and chemokines that orchestrate specific steps of emigration and regulate preferential recruitment of different leukocytes, depending on the expression patterns of the corresponding chemokine receptors. A number of adhesion molecules (ie, VCAM-1, P-selectin, and ICAM-1), chemokines (ie, MCP-1/CCL2 and interleukin-8/CXCL8), and related chemokine receptors (ie, CCR2 and CXCR2), have been functionally implicated in atherosclerosis.26
Our immunohistochemical analyses in heart and intestine revealed that fractalkine was expressed predominantly in arterial endothelial cells under normal conditions. However, TNF-
increased fractalkine expression predominantly in arterial and capillary endothelial cells, whereas little or no induction of fractalkine expression in venous and lymphatic endothelial cells was observed. Furthermore, TNF-
increased fractalkine expression markedly in endocardium of cardiac walls, the endocardial surfaces of cardiac valves, and the endothelium of intestinal villi. These data suggest that TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression is endothelial cell-specific. Considering the interaction between fractalkine-expressing endothelial cells and CX3CR1-expressing leukocytes in vivo, fractalkine must be involved in arterial inflammation rather than venous inflammation. In fact, recent reports indicated that fractalkine/CX3CR1 is closely involved in formation of arterial atherosclerosis.27-29
Prominent expression of fractalkine in smooth muscle cells located in macrophage-rich areas of atherosclerotic plaques was observed in apoE/ mice on a high-fat Western diet.27
Moreover, CX3CR1/ mice have less artheroma formation.27
Polymorphisms of CX3CR1 at I249 and M280 are associated with decreased risk of coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis.28,29
Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease.27
Thus, fractalkine/CX3CR1 could be an adhesion molecule and receptor involved in arterial inflammation and formation of atherosclerosis.
Mithramycin A is known to inhibit tumors and bone resorption by cross-linking GC-rich DNA, thus blocking binding of Sp-family transcription factors to gene regulatory elements.22-24
Thus, mithramycin A has been proposed as a therapeutic agent in severe neoplastic diseases such as chronic myelogenous leukemia, testicular cancer, and Pagets disease.30-32
Our results revealed that pretreatment with mithramycin A dramatically suppressed TNF-
-induced fractalkine expression in endothelial cells. In addition, our preliminary results indicate that mithramycin A is also a strong inhibitor of inflammatory cytokine-induced VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in endothelial cells. Thus, mithramycin A has the potential to be used as an anti-inflammatory drug by decreasing adhesiveness between cytokine-induced leukocytes and endothelial cells through suppression of adhesion molecule expression. Therefore, mithramycin A and its analogs warrant further evaluation as potential anti-inflammatory drugs.
|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Bio-Challenge Program of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology and the Brain Korea 21 Project.
Accepted for publication January 22, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:7614-7620This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Koziolek, G.-A. Muller, A. Zapf, D. Patschan, H. Schmid, C. D. Cohen, S. Koschnick, R. Vasko, C. Bramlage, and F. Strutz Role of CX3C-chemokine CX3C-L/fractalkine expression in a model of slowly progressive renal failure Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 24, 2009; (2009) gfp602v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Sullivan, J. L. Pardieck, D. Doran, Y. Zhang, J.-X. She, and J. S. Pollock Greater fractalkine expression in mesenteric arteries of female spontaneously hypertensive rats compared with males Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): H1080 - H1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zanchi, C. Zoja, M. Morigi, F. Valsecchi, X. Y. Liu, D. Rottoli, M. Locatelli, S. Buelli, A. Pezzotta, P. Mapelli, et al. Fractalkine and CX3CR1 Mediate Leukocyte Capture by Endothelium in Response to Shiga Toxin J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1460 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, S.-O. Moon, W. Kim, M. J. Sung, D. H. Kim, K. P. Kang, Y. B. Jang, J. E. Lee, K. Y. Jang, S. Y. Lee, et al. Protective role of L-2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid in cisplatin-induced renal injury Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2085 - 2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, W. Kim, S.-O. Moon, M. J. Sung, D. H. Kim, K. P. Kang, Y. B. Jang, J. E. Lee, K. Y. Jang, and S. K. Park Rosiglitazone ameliorates cisplatin-induced renal injury in mice Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2096 - 2105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-O. Moon, W. Kim, M. J. Sung, S. Lee, K. P. Kang, D. H. Kim, S. Y. Lee, J.-N. So, and S. K. Park Resveratrol Suppresses Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}-Induced Fractalkine Expression in Endothelial Cells Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 112 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sung, W. Kim, S. Y. Ahn, C.-H. Cho, G. Y. Koh, S.-O. Moon, D. H. Kim, S. Lee, K. P. Kang, K. Y. Jang, et al. Protective Effect of {alpha}-Lipoic Acid in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Endothelial Fractalkine Expression Circ. Res., October 28, 2005; 97(9): 880 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Raines and N. Ferri Thematic Review Series: The Immune System and Atherogenesis. Cytokines affecting endothelial and smooth muscle cells in vascular disease J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 1081 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Sukkar, R. Issa, S. Xie, U. Oltmanns, R. Newton, and K. F. Chung Fractalkine/CX3CL1 production by human airway smooth muscle cells: induction by IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} and regulation by TGF-{beta} and corticosteroids Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): L1230 - L1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |