| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


From the Division of Rheumatology,* Duke University Medical Center, Durham; and the Medical Research Service,
Durham VA Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The consequences of cell death extend beyond the loss of tissue. As shown in both in vivo and in vitro studies, dead cells can induce important immunological changes, with apoptotic cells showing anti-inflammatory activities and necrotic cells showing pro-inflammatory activities.4-6 These activities result at least in part from cellular macromolecules that can become either rearranged or released during the death process. Among these changes, the exposure of phosphatidylserine on the cell membrane during apoptosis can signal an anti-inflammatory state while release of the high mobility group-1 protein can cause a proinflammatory state.7-16 Other cellular molecules implicated in these activities include DNA, whose immunological activity may vary depending on concentration and protein binding.17-18
The extent to which dead cells expose or release internal molecules in an immunologically active form is determined by their uptake and clearance. These processes are highly efficient and result primarily by macrophages which bind dead and dying cells via cell surface molecules to promote phagocytosis.19-24 While the organism has a high capacity for clearance, the residue of dead and dying cells can nevertheless appear in the external milieu in certain circumstances as manifest, for example, by increased levels of circulating DNA in blood. High levels of DNA appear in diverse conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), cancer, and trauma and result from either an excessive burden of dead cells or impaired clearance.25-30
In recent studies, our laboratory has been investigating the clearance of dead and dying cells in the murine system to determine the circumstances in which DNA appears in the blood. As a model, we have assessed circulating levels of plasma DNA in mice that have received agents to induce in vivo apoptosis or have been infused with human Jurkat cells made apoptotic or necrotic in vitro.31,32 As shown previously, induction of in vivo apoptosis by LPS or anti-Fas antibody treatment, similar to administration of apoptotic and necrotic Jurkat cells, causes a prompt blood DNA response. In contrast, treatment with dexamethasone fails to induce elevation of blood DNA. These results are surprising, since dexamethasone causes significant thymocyte loss, raising the possibility that dexamethasone may affect events after the induction of cell death, including clearance.31,32
In the current experiments, we have addressed whether dexamethasone may modify the in vivo clearance of dead and dying cells in a way that affects DNA release into the external milieu. We have therefore measured levels of DNA in the blood in mice treated with dexamethasone and then infused with dead and dying cells or given anti-Fas to induce in vivo apoptosis.33,34 In results presented herein, we show that dexamethasone in a dose-dependent manner can prevent DNA release resulting from the administration of dead and dying cells as well as modify the consequences of anti-Fas treatment. Together, these findings indicate that glucocorticoids may modify events in the cell death process and provide evidence for a novel action of glucocorticoids that may be relevant to their use as anti-inflammatory agents to treat diseases such as SLE.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Female BALB/c mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) and were used for experiments at ages 6 to 12 weeks. To assess the effects of glucocorticoids on DNA release, mice were pretreated with various doses of dexamethasone (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO) 24 hours before the administration of apoptotic or necrotic cells or treatment with anti-Fas antibody. Both dexamethasone and anti-Fas were administered by the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route.
For the induction of apoptosis, Jurkat cells growing in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) were treated with etoposide (Sigma Chemical Co.) at 30 µg/ml for 24 hours. For the induction of necrosis, cells were treated with 70% ethanol for 10 minutes. After treatment, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and suspended in PBS. The cells were administered i.p. at 108cells/mouse. Mice treated with anti-Fas antibody (product of BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) received 10 µg/mouse. Following these treatments, mice were bled at regular times thereafter as indicated in the figures. The blood samples were collected into tubes with 3 to 5 µl of 0.5 mol/L EDTA, followed immediately by centrifugation. The plasma was removed and stored in 20°C until use.
Quantitation of Plasma DNA
Plasma DNA was assessed by a fluorimetric assay as previously described.35 Briefly, plasmas in various dilutions were mixed at a 1:1 ratio with the dye PicoGreen (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted 1:200 in TE buffer (10 mmol/L Tris, 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 8) in a black 96-well microtiter plate (Costar, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY). The DNA concentration was determined from fluorescence measurements using a TECAN GENios microplate fluorescence reader (Salzburg, Austria), with an excitation wavelength at 485 nm and an emission wavelength at 535 nm. Data were collected as relative fluorescence units (RFU), with DNA concentrations in plasma were calculated according to a standard curve using double stranded calf thymus DNA (Sigma Chemical Co.)
Enzyme Assays
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in plasma was measured with a cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Briefly, plasma samples were diluted 1:500 in PBS/0.5% BSA and added to the substrate mix. After 30 minutes incubation at room temperature, the reaction was stopped and the concentration of LDH was determined by measuring the OD490 value. Data are reported as OD490 values. Caspase 3 was assayed using a caspase 3 kit (Molecular Probes). Briefly, plasma samples were diluted 1:100 in PBS and incubated with caspase 3 substrate at room temperature for 30 minutes. Fluorescence units were determined using a TECAN GENios microplate fluorescence reader as described above.
Flow Cytometry Analysis
To assess the effects of dexamethasone on immune cell populations, flow cytometry was performed on preparations of peritoneal washout cells and splenocytes. Briefly, mice were administered either 2.5 mg of dexamethasone/mouse in 100 µl of PBS or 100 µl of PBS alone as control. At 24 hours, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and peritoneal cells were harvested by lavage with 5 ml of cold RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY). Splenocytes were obtained by gently expressing the cells into a Petri dish containing cold RPMI 1640 medium using two microscope slides. The cells were pelleted at 300 x g for 5 minutes and resuspended in hypotonic lysis buffer to remove red blood cells, followed by centrifugation and two washes with PBS/0.5% BSA. The cell concentrations were adjusted to 1 x 107/ml in PBS. 100 µl (1 x 106 cells) were used for staining. Cells were treated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD PharMingen), and then stained with either PE-anti-mouse F4/80 (Serotec, Raleigh, NC) or PE-anti-mouse Ly-6G, Ly-6C (BD PharMingen), double stained with annexin V-FITC (BD PharMingen). Cells were analyzed by FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mansfield, MA). Data analysis was done using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry System, San Jose, CA).
Wright Staining
Peritoneal cells were harvested as described. Cytospin slides were stained with a Diff-Quik stain set (Dade Behring, Newark, DE).
TUNEL Staining
Livers were snap-frozen in Tissue Tek (Sakura Finetek, USA Inc. Torrance, CA) and 6-µm-thick sections were stained using a TdT FragEL kit (Oncogene Research Products, Boston, MA) for apoptotic cells. Cryosections were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and apoptotic nuclei were recognized by DNA fragment end-labeling, followed by streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate. DAB was used to detect the apoptotic cells and methyl green as counterstaining.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of the data were performed using Students two-tailed t-test. In figures and the table, values showing a statistically significant difference from controls at P < 0.05 are indicated by an asterisk.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figure 1A
shows time course experiments of plasma DNA levels in control mice and mice treated with dexamethasone at 2.5 mg and then administered 108 Jurkat cells treated with etoposide to induce apoptosis. As these results indicate, while normal mice receiving the apoptotic cells showed a rise in DNA levels over a 24-hour period, the mice receiving dexamethasone showed no increase in DNA levels over the same time period. Assays with LDH (Figure 1B)
showed similar results.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 5
shows results of DNA measurements of plasma of control and dexamethasone treated mice receiving 10 µg of anti-Fas. As these data indicate, treatment of mice with dexamethasone prevents the DNA increase resulting from anti-Fas treatment. Similar results were obtained with the LDH assay. Since control mice treated with Jo2 died with this treatment, only the results of the 8-hour time point are shown. As these data indicate, dexamethasone prevents the rise in both DNA and LDH levels following anti-Fas treatment and, in addition, increases animal survival, with all six mice surviving beyond 48 hours, the point of the termination of the experiment.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In these studies, we have used the administration of apoptotic and necrotic Jurkat cells as a model to investigate the clearance process. As shown previously, intraperitoneal administration of apoptotic and necrotic cells leads in a dose-dependent way to the appearance of DNA as well as nucleosomes in the blood.32 The source of this DNA can be readily determined since Jurkat cells are from a human male, allowing the use of a Y chromosomal sequence as a marker. As shown by PCR analysis, the DNA in the blood after administration of Jurkat cells arises primarily from the human cell line although DNA from the murine host, as measured using a GAPDH sequence, also contributes. Furthermore, plasma DNA that appears after administration of apoptotic and necrotic cells shows laddering by gel electrophoresis, implying nuclease digestion consistent with apoptosis.32
In previous experiments on the origin of circulating DNA, we assessed the responses of mice in which macrophages were eliminated by treatment with clodronate liposomes. This treatment, which causes macrophage death by apoptosis,40-42 leads to an initial rise in blood DNA, likely reflecting the generation of apoptotic cells and the absence of a clearance system. Subsequent administration of apoptotic or necrotic cells, however, fails to produce a blood DNA response. Silica treatment, which can functionally inactivate macrophages,43,44 also prevents the blood DNA response that occurs after administration of dead and dying cells; in our studies, however, silica did not cause an initial DNA elevation. These observations suggest that a blood DNA response involves a role of macrophages and does not simply reflect the disintegration of apoptotic or necrotic cells.
Similar to the administration of apoptotic and necrotic cells, in vivo induction of apoptosis can lead to a blood DNA response depending on the inducing agent,. Thus, treatment of normal mice with LPS and anti-Fas, but not dexamethasone, can cause significant blood DNA responses.31 Since these agents all induce in vivo apoptosis, these findings suggest that the appearance of DNA after in vivo cell death may depend on the site of cell death (eg, liver or thymus), the cell type killed (eg, hepatocyte or lymphocyte) as well as effects of the inducing agent on the clearance process. For example, LPS can induce cytokines that modulate macrophage function while anti-Fas may affect the viability or function of macrophages expressing Fas.45 The difference in the levels of DNA following in vivo apoptosis may also depend on the number of cells undergoing apoptosis, although assessing the total cells killed is difficult because of uncertainty in their locale and their transience following apoptosis.
The lack of a blood DNA response following administration of dexamethasone is striking in view of the large number of thymocytes killed.31 While there are many explanations for this finding, we were interested in the possibility that glucocorticoids can modulate either the clearance of apoptotic cells or their subsequent metabolism to generate circulating DNA. As shown by other investigators, glucocorticoids can affect the uptake of apoptotic cells by macrophages in vitro although these prior experiments did not measure the release of DNA from cells.37-39 Our data extend these findings and demonstrate clearly that glucocorticoids have an important influence on the generation of DNA into the blood. The effect was manifest with both apoptotic and necrotic cell administration as well as treatment of mice with an anti-Fas antibody.
The effects of dexamethasone resemble those induced by both clodronate and silica, agents which either eliminate or inactivate macrophage. In mice treated with these agents, administration of apoptotic or necrotic cells fails to produce a blood DNA response under conditions in which normal mice show high levels of DNA for as long as 24 hours.32 As discussed previously, this effect could result from a failure of macrophages to take up the dead cell which gradually disintegrate or break apart in a manner that does raise blood DNA levels. While glucocorticoids do not cause generalized macrophage apoptosis, they may cause selective loss of macrophage populations.39,46-48 It is possible, therefore, that the in vivo administration of dexamethasone reduces a cell population critical to the clearance of dead and dying cells. In the absence of this cell population, the uptake process may be prevented, limiting DNA release.
In our experiments, mice treated with dexamethasone showed a significant alteration in the cell composition of peritoneum and spleen, with both compartments showing a dramatic increase in neutrophil numbers. This effect can be attributed to the anti-apoptotic activity of glucocorticoids on neutrophils which are short-lived cell programmed to die. The prolongation of neutrophil lifespan, which can be augmented by various mediators and cytokines, may be important in host defense by increasing the number of phagocytic cells as well as during the resolution of inflammation by preventing the breakdown of neutrophils with the resultant spillage of their toxic contents.39,49-51 As suggested by our findings as well as others, glucocorticoids produce a situation in which large numbers of neutrophils, the usual feature of exudates, exist in a microenvironment in which other aspects of the inflammatory process may be blunted or blocked.
While glucocorticoids can increase the life span of neutrophils, these cells must eventually die at which time they may induce other changes encountered in inflammatory reactions. These events may include macrophage apoptosis. Indeed, in our experiments, the spleen showed an increase in the frequency of annexin-positive, F4/80-positive cells, suggesting that, in our model, macrophages may be undergoing apoptosis. In this regard, studies on the carageenan-induced pleurisy model indicate that macrophage apoptosis occurs during resolution of inflammation and follows neutrophil apoptosis.52
Together, these findings thus raise the possibility that macrophage dysfunction or loss may occur during the clearance of large numbers of neutrophils, whether arising during inflammation or secondary to glucocorticoid action. Furthermore, since glucocorticoids directly induce apoptosis in eosinophils, the effects of dead and dying cells on macrophages could be amplified and prolonged in time.50 While these considerations are speculative, they nevertheless suggest the possibility that the effects of glucocorticoids on macrophage number and function may be indirect and result from downstream effects in other cell populations.
In our previous studies, we considered the possibility that blood DNA occurs only when the normal clearance process is overwhelmed.32 At least two possibilities can be proposed for the consequence of overwhelming clearance. Thus, when the macrophage has engulfed excessive cells, DNA may be discharged from macrophages in an incompletely digested form that retains duplex structure. A second possibility concerns the toxicity of dead cells for macrophages. According to this scenario, macrophages, during phagocytosis of high numbers of dead cells, could undergo apoptosis, causing release of its own DNA and that of the engulfed dead cells. The finding of both murine and human DNA in the blood after administration of dead cells to normal mice is consistent with this possibility.32 Furthermore, as discussed above, the effects of glucocorticoids on neutrophils and eosinophils could eventuate in a similar situation.
An alternative possibility to explain the effects of dexamethasone on the blood DNA response concerns a glucocorticoid-induced enhancement of the clearance process. Among its activities in this system, dexamethasone may increase the efficiency of macrophage clearance of dead cells or make them resistant to the apoptosis that occurs with excessive phagocytosis of dead cells. With the macrophage bolstered by glucocorticoids, the clearance process would be enhanced, limiting release of DNA into the external milieu. The effect is both more simple and direct than that postulated above. In studies thus far in vivo (N. Jiang and D. Pisetsky, unpublished observations), however, we have not yet been able to demonstrate increased uptake or clearance of dead cells by macrophage. Since the utilization of large numbers of dead cells in our model limits enumeration of endogenous cell populations, studies are in progress to explore models where the number of administered dead cells is lower.
While the explanation for the activities of dexamethasone on the clearance of exogenous cells awaits further investigation, it is of interest that dexamethasone affects DNA release in the anti-Fas system as well as the Jurkat system despite the important differences in these models. Anti-Fas agent causes massive liver cell death and mortality, with apoptosis induced in hepatocytes by direct engagement of Fas.33,34 Nevertheless, in our experiments, mice pretreated with dexamethasone showed minimal release of DNA, LDH and caspase 3 as well as improved survival. These findings suggest either a direct protective effect of dexamethasone on the hepatocyte or an indirect effect by modulating the activity of macrophages (or other inflammatory cells) in the liver. The latter possibility is supported by findings in other systems on the effect of cytokines (eg, IL-6, TNF) on induction of apoptosis by anti-Fas as well as hepatic toxins. In these systems, modulation of cytokine levels, with consequent effects on anti-apoptotic proteins, modify the occurrence of cell death.53-56 The absence of a rise of caspase 3 after anti-Fas in dexamethasone-treated mice is consistent with prevention of apoptosis.
As these considerations indicate, glucocorticoids may have diverse effects on both apoptosis itself as well as subsequent events in the clearance of dead and dying cells. Since dead and dying cells can have important immunological effects, glucocorticoids have the potential to alter the immune environments in settings (eg, SLE, sepsis, toxin exposure) characterized by high burdens of apoptotic cells. In the setting of SLE, the effects of glucocorticoids on DNA release may be particularly important since DNA in the circulation can serve as a driving antigen for anti-DNA production as well as form immune complexes that can both stimulate cytokine production and deposit in the tissue.17,18 Studies are in progress to characterize further the effects of glucocorticoids on DNA release into the circulation in various pathological settings.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by a VA Merit Review grant, an Alliance for Lupus Research grant, and National Institutes of Health grant AI44808.
Accepted for publication January 28, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B/Toll-like receptor pathway in induction of inflammatory and tissue-repair gene expression by necrotic cells. J Immunol 2001, 166:7128-7135
induces high mobility group box 1 protein release partly through a TNF-dependent mechanism. J Immunol 2003, 170:3890-3897
and Fas Ligand in concanavalin A-induced hepatitis. J Immunol 1998, 160:4082-4089This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Garcia Moreira, B. Prieto Garcia, J. M. Baltar Martin, F. Ortega Suarez, and F. V. Alvarez Cell-Free DNA as a Noninvasive Acute Rejection Marker in Renal Transplantation Clin. Chem., November 1, 2009; 55(11): 1958 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Pisetsky The Role of Nuclear Macromolecules in Innate Immunity Proceedings of the ATS, July 1, 2007; 4(3): 258 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Bell, W. Jiang, C. F. Reich III, and D. S. Pisetsky The extracellular release of HMGB1 during apoptotic cell death Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): C1318 - C1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |