| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |








From the Department of Internal Medicine III,* Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; the Department of Dermatology,
Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan; the Department of Biochemistry,
Hokuriku University, Kanazawa, Japan; the Division of Molecular and Cellular Immunology,
Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; and the Departments of Medicine and Pathology, ¶ Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption and are widely used drugs for treatment of osteoporosis and osteolytic bone metastasis.8 In vitro anti-tumor properties of bisphosphonates include inhibition of tumor proliferation and invasion and induction of apoptosis of various cancer cell lines.9,10 Recently, farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) synthase has been shown as a molecular target of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, and inhibition of posttranslational prenylation of small molecular weight G proteins is likely involved in their anti-resorptive activity on osteoclasts.11 Bisphosphonates have been reported to accumulate in human vessels.12 Furthermore, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates such as ibandronate and zoledronic acid have been shown to inhibit angiogenesis in vitro.13 These observations suggest that nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates might have pleiotropic properties on endothelial cells (ECs) by blocking isoprenoid intermediates, which serve as lipid attachments for a variety of intracellular signaling molecules.14
NADPH oxidase activity is required for the angiogenic signaling of VEGF,15 and small G protein Rac is a critical component of the endothelial NADPH oxidase complex.16 Further, VEGF is a key factor for melanoma angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration, the extent of which being correlated with tumor prognosis.17,18 These observations led us to examine whether minodronate, a newly developed nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, could inhibit melanoma growth and improve survival in nude mice by suppressing the tumor-associated angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration in vivo. We also investigated in the present study whether and how minodronate could block the VEGF signaling in ECs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One million G361 cells were injected intradermally into the upper flank of 6-week-old female athymic nude mice (n = 5 in each group). Mice received intraperitoneal injections of 5 µg of minodronate (Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan) or physiological saline solution daily. The chemical structure of minodronate is shown in Figure 1
. Its molecular weight is 340.16. The smallest and largest diameters of tumors were measured at 5-day intervals with a digital caliper, and tumor volumes were calculated using the following formula: volume (mm3) = [(smallest diameter)2 x (largest diameter)]/2. All animal procedures were conducted according to the guidelines provided by the Hokkaido University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under an approved protocol.
|
Five cryostat sections of tumor xenograft were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD31 or Mac-3 Abs (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) as described previously.19 Nuclei were stained with propidium iodide. Three different fields at x60 magnification were examined on each section with confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy. Green fluorescence-positive area in three different fields of each section was measured.
Assay for in Situ Apoptosis
Sections of tumor xenograft were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for morphological analysis. Terminal dUTP nick-end labeling assay was performed using an in situ apoptosis detection kit according to the manufacturers instructions (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The number of apoptotic cells was counted in 10 randomly selected fields at x200 magnification using confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy.
Cell Culture Conditions
The human adult skin microvascular ECs were incubated in endothelial cell basal medium (EBM) medium (Clonetics Corp., San Diego, CA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 0.4% bovine brain extracts in the presence or absence of 10 ng/ml VEGF (PeproTech, London, UK), 10 µmol/L (3.4 µg/ml) minodronate, 100 nmol/L diphenylene iodonium (DPI) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 1 µg/ml geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) (Sigma), 10 µmol/L FTI-276 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), 1 µmol/L GGTI-286 (Calbiochem), 1 mmol/L N-acetylcysteine (Sigma), 1 µg/ml monoclonal Abs (mAbs) against human intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), dominant-negative human Rac-1 mutant (DN-RacT17N), or dominant-negative human Ras mutant (DN-RasS17N). G361 melanoma cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were incubated in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin in the presence or absence of various concentrations of minodronate or 0.5 µg/ml FPP (Sigma).
Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Generation
Intracellular ROS generation was detected by using the fluorescent probe CM-H2DCFDA (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) as described previously.20 Briefly, cells (2 x 104/96-well-plate) were loaded with 10 µmol/L CM-H2DCFDA, incubated for 45 minutes at 37°C, and analyzed in a Fluoroskan Ascent FL (Thermo Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland) using the Ascent Software for Windows program.
In Situ ROS Generation in Tumor ECs
The oxidative fluorescent probe dihydroethidium (Molecular Probes Inc.) was used to detect in situ levels of ROS in tumor ECs according to the method of Miller and colleagues.21 Briefly, the unfixed frozen tissues were cut into 10-µm-thick sections. The sections were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD31 Abs (Beckton Dickinson) and then with 2 µmol/L dihydroethidium. Three different fields at x60 magnification were examined on each section with confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy. Red fluorescence-positive area in three different fields of each section was measured.
Transfection of DN-RacT17N and DN-RasS17N
The DN-RacT17N expression vector was kindly provided by Dr. Y. Horiguchi, Department of Bacterial Toxicology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. The DN-RasS17N expression vector was kindly provided by Dr. T. Sato, Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan. ECs were transiently transfected with either DN-RacT17N, DN-RasS17N or an empty vector using Tfx-50 reagent according to the manufactures instructions (Promega, Madison, WI).
Measurement of [3H]Thymidine Incorporation in ECs
[3H]Thymidine incorporation in cells was determined as described previously.22
Assay for Ras Activation
ECs were incubated with or without 10 ng/ml VEGF for 24 hours in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/L minodronate or 100 nmol/L DPI. Ras activity then was measured using a Ras Activation Assay kit (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Charlottesville, VA) following the manufacturers instructions.
Assay for in Vitro Tube Formation
In vitro tube formation was assayed as described previously.23 Briefly, wells of 24-well culture cluster dishes (Costar 3524; Costar, Cambridge, MA) were coated with Matrigel solution (250 µl/well; Beckton Dickinson, Bedford, MA), then allowed to solidify for at least 1 hour at 37°C. ECs (4 x 104 cells/well) were then seeded on Matrigel with 10 ng/ml of VEGF in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/L minodronate. After 6 hours, four microscopic fields selected at random were photographed, and the lengths of capillary-like structures were measured. The vessel structures were confirmed by electron microscopic analysis.
Primers and Probes
Primer sequences used in semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) were 5'-AATGGGGCTGGGACTTCTCATTGG-3' and 5'-GCCTGGGTGACAGAGCGAGAGCTT-3' for human ICAM-1 mRNA, and 5'-AACTGAAGCTCGCACTCTCG-3' and 5'-TCAGCACAGATCTCCTTGGC-3' for human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) mRNAs. Sequences of the upstream and downstream primers used in RT-PCR for detecting ß-actin mRNAs were the same as described previously.24
Semiquantitative RT-PCR
Poly(A)+ RNAs were isolated from cells, and analyzed by RT-PCR as described previously.25 The amounts of poly(A)+ RNA templates (30 ng) and cycle numbers (33 cycles for ICAM-1 gene; 30 cycle for MCP-1 gene; 22 cycles for ß-actin gene) for amplification were chosen in quantitative ranges, in which reactions proceeded linearly, that had been determined by plotting signal intensities as functions of the template amounts and cycle numbers.25
Assay of MOLT-3 Cell Adhesion to ECs
Molt-3 cell adhesion to ECs was assayed according to the method of de Clerck and colleagues.26 Briefly, ECs were treated with 10 ng/ml of VEGF in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/L minodronate or 1 µg/ml ICAM-1 mAbs for 24 hours, and then incubated with BCECF-AM-labeled Molt-3 cells for 30 minutes. After incubation, the cells were solubilized by 1% Triton X-100 and the fluorescent intensities of the cells were measured.
Measurement of MCP-1
MCP-1 proteins released into media were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system according to the manufacturers instructions (R&D Systems).
Assay for in Vitro Apoptosis
G361 cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of minodronate in the presence or absence of 0.5 µg/ml of FPP for 24 hours. Then the cells were lysed and the supernatant was analyzed in an ELISA for DNA fragments (Cell Death Detection ELISA; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Statistical Analysis
All values were presented as means ± SE. Unless otherwise indicated, one-way analysis of variance followed by the Scheffé F-test, was performed for statistical comparisons. In Figure 2, A, C, D, and E
, and Figure 3C
, unpaired t-test was performed for comparison between control and minodronate-treated groups; P < 0.05 was considered significant.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because minodronate has been reported to dose dependently reduce osteolytic bone metastases in nude mice at the range of 0.2 to 20 µg/mouse/day,27
we chose the dose of 5-µg daily injection of minodronate in our animal experiments. We first investigated whether minodronate could inhibit melanoma growth in nude mice. G361 xenograft melanoma cells formed rapidly growing tumors in nude mice, reaching 500 to 600 mm3 after 40 days. In contrast, intraperitoneal daily injection of 5 µg of minodronate almost completely inhibited the in vivo tumor growth of G361 cells throughout an observation period of up to 40 days (Figure 2, A and B)
.
Tumor-associated angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration have been known to play an important role in tumor growth and expansion in vivo.28,29
So, we next studied the effects of minodronate on angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration in G361 melanoma xenografts. Minodronate treatment was found to significantly inhibit tumor-associated angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration in nude mice (Figure 2, C and D
, respectively). These observations suggest that minodronate might inhibit melanoma growth in nude mice by blocking the tumor-associated angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration in vivo.
Tumors cannot survive without establishing a vascular supply.1,2
Histological examinations revealed extensive areas of tumor necrosis in minodronate-treated G361 xenograft (Figure 2E)
. Furthermore, apoptotic cell death of melanoma xenografts was significantly increased by the treatment of minodronate. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the rate of host mouse survival was significantly higher in minodronate-treated group than that in the control group (Figure 2F)
. None of the minodronate-treated mice died throughout an observation period of up to 100 days.
Minodronate Inhibits VEGF-Induced ROS Generation in ECs
VEGF is a key factor for tumor angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration, thus being involved in melanoma growth and progression.17,18,30
Because ROS generation is reported to be required for the VEGF signaling in ECs,31
we first studied whether minodronate could inhibit the ROS generation elicited by VEGF. After the intraperitoneal administration of 5 µg of minodronate, its peak plasma concentration reaches
10 µmol/L (unpublished data). Therefore, we did the following in vitro experiments with minodronate at the concentration of 10 µmol/L. Minodronate or DPI, an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase, completely inhibited the VEGF-induced ROS production in ECs (Figure 3A)
. Further, the inhibitory effect of minodronate on ROS generation was completely reversed by GGPP. These results suggest that VEGF induces ROS generation through NADPH oxidase and that minodronate inhibits the ROS generation by suppressing geranylgeranylation of Rac, one of the important components of NADPH oxidase complex.16
Pharmacological inhibitors are not absolutely specific to one cellular target. Because DPI can inhibit other superoxide generating enzymes, we performed experiments using molecular techniques. Overexpression of DN-RacT17N also prevented the increase of ROS generation in VEGF-exposed ECs (Figure 3B)
. These observations also indicate that Rac is directly involved in the VEGF-induced ROS production in microvascular ECs. Minodronate treatment was also found to decrease in situ ROS generation in tumor ECs (Figure 3C)
. Thus, minodronate exerts anti-oxidative effects on ECs of tumor-associated blood vessels probably by blocking the VEGF signaling in vivo.
Minodronate Inhibits VEGF-Induced DNA Synthesis and Tube Formation in ECs
We next investigated a functional role of NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation in VEGF-induced angiogenesis. DPI or an anti-oxidant, N-acetylcysteine, completely inhibited the VEGF-induced increase in DNA synthesis, suggesting that NADPH oxidase-derived ROS is involved in the VEGF signaling to angiogenesis (Figure 4A)
. Inactivation of Rac by 10 µmol/L minodronate or a geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitor, GGTI-286, or overexpression of DN-RacT17N also prevented the VEGF effect, thus demonstrating that geranylgeranylation of Rac is necessary for the angiogenic signals of VEGF (Figure 4, B and C)
. However, in contrast to the case with ROS production, the effect of minodronate on DNA synthesis was not reversed by GGPP. These results suggest that inactivation of other G proteins might also be involved in the anti-angiogenic effects of minodronate. Minodronate at lower concentrations (0.1 and 1 µmol/L) did not affect DNA synthesis in ECs, irrespective of the presence or absence of VEGF (data not shown). These findings suggest that, unlike the effects of statins, minodronate does not have biphasic actions on DNA synthesis in ECs at the concentrations of 0.1 to 10 µmol/L.32
Furthermore, minodronate did not induce apoptotic cell death in ECs exposed to VEGF (data not shown).
|
The process of angiogeneis is completed by the formation of microvascular tubes.23
In vitro assays for tube formation of ECs have been developed and used to study this critical step of angiogenesis. Therefore, we further studied the effect of minodronate on tube formation on Matrigel, where ECs take only several hours to associate with each other and to form microtubes.23
Minodronate completely prevented the VEGF-induced tube formation on Matrigel (Figure 4G)
. These observations suggest that minodronate could inhibit tube formation of microvascular ECs, the key steps of angiogenesis by blocking the VEGF signaling as well.
Minodronate Inhibits VEGF-Induced ICAM-1 and MCP-1 Overexpression in ECs
VEGF also acts as a proinflammatory cytokine.33,34
To determine whether minodronate could block the proinflammatory signals of VEGF, we investigated the effects of minodronate on ICAM-1 and MCP-1 expression in VEGF-exposed ECs. Minodronate completely inhibited the VEGF-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 and MCP-1 mRNA levels in microvascular ECs (Figure 5A)
. Because our RT-PCR analyses are semiquantitative, to confirm the mRNA findings, we did leukocyte adhesion assay and MCP-1 ELISA. Minodronate inhibited ICAM-1-mediated Molt-3 cell adhesion to, and MCP-1 overproduction in, microvascular ECs (Figure 5, B and C)
. Cell-based ELISA confirmed that VEGF actually induced ICAM-1 protein expression, which was completely blocked by minodronate (data not shown). GGTI-286 or FTI-276, a geranylgeranyltransferase or farnesyltransferase inhibitor, respectively, also inhibited the VEGF-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 and MCP-1 (data not shown), suggesting the involvement of both Rac and Ras in the VEGF signaling to inflammation as well.
|
We next investigated the direct effects of minodronate on DNA synthesis and apoptotic cell death of cultured G361 cells in vitro. Minodronate was found to decrease DNA synthesis and increase apoptotic cell death of melanoma cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 6, A and B)
. Minodronate at 10 µmol/L, which effectively blocked the VEGF signaling in cultured ECs, significantly induced apoptotic cell death of melanoma cells, whose effects were completely reversed by the addition of 0.5 µg/ml of FPP (Figure 6C)
. GGPP at 1 µg/ml did not affect the proapoptotic effects of minodronate in vitro (data not shown). These results suggest that minodronate could act on melanoma cells directly to induce apoptosis via suppression of Ras farnesylation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several lines of evidence implicate VEGF as the key factor involved in melanoma growth and metastasis.4
VEGF expression levels are associated with angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration, the extent of which being correlated with melanoma prognosis.17,18,30
Our present study suggests that minodronate might inhibit melanoma growth and expansion by blocking the VEGF signaling in vivo. Figure 7
illustrates a proposed scheme, by which VEGF promotes growth and expansion in melanoma xenografts; VEGF might induce the tumor-associated angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration through NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation and Ras activation in ECs. Minodronate could block the VEGF signaling via inhibition of protein prenylation of both Rac and Ras, thus suppressing melanoma growth and subsequently improving survival in nude mice. In our present study, the effects of minodronate on VEGF-induced ROS generation, DNA synthesis, and tube formation in cultured ECs were quite strong, whereas those on ROS generation in ECs in vivo and tumor angiogenesis were modest. These observations suggest that angiogenic factors other than VEGF could also be involved in tumor angiogenesis in melanoma xenografts.
|
In this study, the anti-angiogenic effects of minodronate on VEGF-exposed ECs were not reversed by GGPP. These results suggest that G proteins other than Rac might also be involved in the downstream signaling of VEGF. We obtained the following evidence that Ras was a downstream effector of NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation: VEGF activated Ras, which was completely blocked by minodronate or an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase, DPI (Figure 4D)
; and inactivation of Ras by a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, FTI-276, or overexpression of DN-RasS17N inhibited the angiogenic effects of VEGF on microvascular ECs (Figure 4, E and F)
. Ras has been proposed as a key regulator of the signaling cascade triggered by oxidative stress,38-40
and is also required for mitogenic signals of various growth factors including VEGF.41,42
Taken together, our present study suggests that farnesylation of Ras is also a target of minodronate and that the anti-angiogenic effect of minodronate on VEGF-exposed ECs could be attributed to inhibition of protein prenylation of both Rac and Ras.
VEGF also acts as a proinflammatory cytokine; it not only induces ICAM-1 in ECs, but also stimulates secretion of MCP-1 that recruits leukocytes to sites of inflammation.33,34
ICAM-1 and MCP-1 are involved in macrophage infiltration into tumors as well, the extent of which is correlated with tumor neovascularization.43,44
We demonstrated here that minodronate inhibited leukocytes adhesion to VEGF-exposed ECs by suppressing ICAM-1 expression. Further, minodronate inhibited MCP-1 expression both at mRNA and protein levels. Because GGTI-286 or FTI-276, a geranylgeranyltransferase or farnesyltransferase inhibitor, respectively, also inhibited the proinflammatory signals of VEGF (data not shown), minodronate could block the VEGF signaling to inflammation in ECs by inhibiting protein prenylation of both Rac and Ras, as the case in angiogenesis. Although we did not investigate whether minodronate could inhibit peripheral monocyte adhesion to VEGF-exposed ECs, the present study suggests that minodronate could inhibit the tumor-associated macrophage infiltration by suppressing the VEGF signaling to ICAM-1 and MCP-1 overexpression. VEGF has been known to induce expression of ICAM-1 and MCP-1 through the redox-sensitive transcriptional factor, NF-
B activation in ECs.33,34
Minodronate may inhibit the NF-
B activation induced by VEGF. These observations suggest that the VEGF signaling to inflammation in ECs might also be coupled to the redox state of the cell and that minodronate exerts anti-inflammatory effects on VEGF-exposed ECs through its anti-oxidative properties. Minodronate treatment decreased in situ ROS generation in tumor ECs, further supporting our concept that minodronate might block the VEGF signaling in vivo through its anti-oxidative properties.
We also found here that minodronate at 10 µmol/L, which effectively blocked the VEGF signaling in cultured ECs, induced apoptotic cell death of cultured G361 cells, whose effects were completely reversed by FPP, but not GGPP (Figure 6C)
. These results suggest that minodronate acted on melanoma cells directly to induce apoptosis via inhibition of farnesylation of Ras. Essential roles of oncogenic Ras in melanoma genesis and maintenance are reported in mouse models, thus suggesting that proapoptotic effects of minodronate observed in our in vivo experiments could be attributed partly to its direct effects on melanoma cells.45
Taken together, the present study has highlighted two beneficial aspects of the effects of minodronate on melanoma growth and expansion; one is the suppression of tumor-associated angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration probably by blocking the VEGF signaling in vivo, and the other is induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. This scenario could possibly explain why the effects of minodronate on tumor growth and survival were extremely impressive, whereas those on tumor angiogenesis were modest.
Our present study provides a novel potential therapeutic efficacy of minodronate for the treatment of melanoma. We do not know whether the other types of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates have the same anti-tumor effects on melanoma xenografts. Clinical investigation is needed to evaluate the efficacy of this new pharmacological approach as an anti-tumor therapy.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by grants from Venture Research and Development Centers from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan (to S.Y.); and by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (to R.A.).
Accepted for publication August 12, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Fujimura, S.-i. Yamagishi, S. Ueda, K. Fukami, R. Shibata, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Kaida, A. Hayashida, K. Koike, T. Matsui, et al. Administration of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) reduces proteinuria by suppressing decreased nephrin and increased VEGF expression in the glomeruli of adriamycin-injected rats Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1397 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nakamura, S.-i. Yamagishi, T. Matsui, T. Yoshida, K. Takenaka, Y. Jinnouchi, Y. Yoshida, S.-i. Ueda, H. Adachi, and T. Imaizumi Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia after Vascular Injury by Blocking NADPH Oxidase-Mediated Reactive Oxygen Species Generation Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2007; 170(6): 2159 - 2170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Khamaisi, E. Regev, N. Yarom, B. Avni, E. Leitersdorf, I. Raz, and S. Elad Possible Association between Diabetes and Bisphosphonate-Related Jaw Osteonecrosis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 1172 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Roelofs, K. Thompson, S. Gordon, and M. J. Rogers Molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: current status. Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 12(20): 6222s - 6230s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Inoue, T. Karashima, S. Fukata, A. Nomura, C. Kawada, A. Kurabayashi, M. Furihata, Y. Ohtsuki, and T. Shuin Effect of Combination Therapy with a Novel Bisphosphonate, Minodronate (YM529), and Docetaxel on a Model of Bone Metastasis by Human Transitional Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 11(18): 6669 - 6677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Clezardin, F. H. Ebetino, and P. G.J. Fournier Bisphosphonates and Cancer-Induced Bone Disease: Beyond Their Antiresorptive Activity Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 4971 - 4974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |