| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |




From the Department of Internal Medicine I,* Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, the Center of Excellence for Clinical and Experimental Oncology, and the Department of Clinical Pathology,
Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; the University of Veterinary Medicine,
Vienna, Austria; and the Department of Pathology,
University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
So far, little is known about the pathogenesis of AA. Based on laboratory data and beneficial effects of immunosuppressive therapies, an abnormal function of the immune system has been discussed as contributing to the pathogenesis of AA.2,3,8-13 Thus, previous data have supported the notion that cytotoxic T cells may play a role in the development of AA.2,3,12,13 More recently, it has been suggested that humoral components of the immune system, including antibodies against cellular proteins, are also involved in the pathogenesis of AA.14
Another pathogenetic concept proposed in the context of AA, is related to the BM microenvironment, which consists of endosteal cells, macrophages, fat cells, fibroblasts, and microvascular endothelial cells.15,16 In fact, it has been suggested that an abnormal (decreased) growth and function of such microenvironmental cells in the BM may contribute to the development of BM aplasia in patients with AA.15,16
The microvasculature is an essential component of the microenvironment in diverse organs and has been described as a critical target in various disorders. Likewise, the BM microvasculature is considered to play an important role in hematopoietic neoplasms.17-24 Thus, in most BM neoplasms including myeloid leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes, an enhanced BM angiogenesis has been described.17-20,23,24 To a certain degree, the same may hold true for reactive disease states (systemic inflammation, chronic infection) in which enhanced BM function, ie, growth of progenitor cells in BM cavities, is required for the extra production of granulomonocytic effector cells.
A central regulator of BM angiogenesis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).17-22 Among various VEGF species, VEGF-A appears to be expressed most abundantly in normal and neoplastic myeloid cells.17-22 Thus, in most instances, the levels of VEGF-A correlate with the extent of angiogenesis, ie, the BM microvessel density (MVD).20-22 Within the hematopoietic system, VEGF is considered to be primarily produced in megakaryocytes and immature myeloid cells.24,25 Based on this hypothesis, it was of interest to learn whether BM angiogenesis and VEGF expression change in patients with AA. The specific aims of the present study were to examine BM angiogenesis and VEGF expression in patients with AA and to compare these values with those obtained in normal BM. In addition, we examined the effects of immunosuppressive therapy (with ATG, CSA, and glucocorticoids) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation on angiogenesis and VEGF expression.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eighteen patients with AA were examined in this study. BM specimens were obtained from the posterior iliac crest in all cases after informed consent was given. Additional diagnostic investigations included physical examination, ultrasound (spleen), complete blood count, and blood chemistry. The patients characteristics are shown in Table 1
. The diagnosis of AA was established according to published criteria.26,27
Diagnosis of sAA required a hypocellular BM (cellularity <30% according to Tuzuner and Bennett28
) and two or three of the following abnormal peripheral blood values: absolute neutrophil count <0.5 x 109/L, platelets <20 x 109/L, or anemia with reticulocytopenia of <20 x 109/L. The diagnosis of very severe aplastic anemia (vsAA) was established when sAA criteria were met and absolute neutrophil counts were <0.2 x 109/L. Nonsevere AA (nsAA) was defined as pancytopenia with hypocellular BM and peripheral blood counts not fulfilling criteria of sAA. Based on these criteria, 9 of 18 patients (50%) were classified as nsAA, 6 patients (33%) as sAA, and 3 patients (17%) as vsAA. In all but six patients, the BM was re-examined after immunosuppressive therapy (ATG, CSA, and glucocorticoids) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
|
Immunosuppressive Therapy and Stem Cell Transplantation
Patients were treated with ATG, CSA, and glucocorticoids according to published protocols8,9 after written informed consent was obtained. Fourteen of the eighteen patients received horse ATG (15 mg/kg per day i.v. for 5 to 8 days) and one rabbit ATG (10 mg/kg per day for 5 days) as well as CSA per os (to reach a target serum CSA concentration of 100 to 200 ng/ml) and glucocorticoids (to prevent serum sickness). Nine patients received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) subcutaneously at a dose of 5 µg/kg per day until neutrophil re-covery. In three patients, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was performed using stem cells from an HLA-matched sibling donor after written informed consent was given.
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
In all patients, the BM was examined by routine histology and cytology at diagnosis. In 12 patients, BM was analyzed before and after successful therapy. Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed BM biopsy sections (15 patients) using the indirect immunoperoxidase staining technique as described.21,23,24 Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by methanol/H2O2. The CD34 monoclonal antibody (mAb) QBEND 10 (diluted 1:100) was purchased from Immunotech (Marseilles, France), an antibody against FVIII-related antigen (FVIII-rAG) from Dakopatts (Glostrup, Denmark) (diluted 1:400), and a rabbit anti-VEGF antibody (diluted 1:50) as well as a VEGF-blocking peptide from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies were diluted in 0.05 mol/L Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.5) plus 1% bovine serum albumin and applied for 60 minutes. In case of VEGF staining, BM sections were pretreated by microwave oven. In selected cases, the anti-VEGF antibody was preincubated with a VEGF-blocking peptide before staining. After washing, slides were incubated with biotinylated horse anti-mouse or biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG for 30 minutes, washed, and exposed to avidin-biotin-peroxidase or streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex for 30 minutes. 3-Amino-9-ethyl-carbazole was used as chromogen. Slides were counterstained in Mayers hemalaun. Before quantification, VEGF-stained BM slides were carefully examined for internal positive controls (myeloid progenitors, megakaryocytes, plasma cells) and negative controls (erythrocytes, mature granulocytic cells). Only those slides that showed a homogenous staining pattern for VEGF and the appropriate result for internal (positive and negative) controls were subjected to quantitative analyses. Apart from hematopoietic cells, vessel-lining cells and stromal cells were also labeled by the anti-VEGF antibody, although most of the VEGF in the normal BM was found to be expressed by myeloid cells. Staining results obtained with the anti-VEGF antibody were quantified using an arbitrary score: 1, no reactivity found; 2, only a minority of nucleated cells reactive; 3, majority of all nucleated cells reacting with anti-VEGF; 4, strong expression of VEGF in most cells. The cellularity of the BM was quantified according to published guidelines.28
Determination of MVD
The BM MVD was determined in CD34-stained BM sections and FVIII-rAG-stained BM sections essentially as described by Perez-Atayde and colleagues.22 A total of 10 microscopic fields were examined for the number of events (immunoreactive elements identified as cells). The number of events per field and thus the MVD were determined by two independent observers in each case.
Measurement of Serum VEGF Levels
The levels of VEGF in the serum of our patients with AA were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The levels of immunoreactive VEGF-A were determined in 10 patients with AA and in 20 age-matched healthy controls. In six patients with AA, serum samples obtained at the time of hematological remission after successful immunosuppressive therapy were available for VEGF measurements. Serum VEGF-A concentrations were quantified using a commercial ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The detection limit of the VEGF-A ELISA amounted to 9 pg/ml. In three patients with AA and three healthy controls, both serum and plasma samples were examined for the content of VEGF-A. In 9 patients with AA and in 11 healthy controls, serum levels of VEGF-D were quantified by a commercial ELISA (R&D Systems). The detection limit of the VEGF-D ELISA amounted to 11 pg/ml.
Statistical Evaluation
The level of significance was determined by standard statistical tests including Kruskal-Wallis (comparison between AA and controls) and the paired Students t-test (comparing results before and after therapy). Results were considered to be significantly different when the P value was <0.05. To determine correlations between serum VEGF levels, VEGF expression in the BM, and the BM MVD, linear correlations were applied. In case of multiple comparisons, P values were corrected according to the method of Bonferroni.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Confirming previous studies, patients with AA exhibited reduced BM cellularity when compared to normal BM (AA, 7 ± 6% versus normal BM, 49 ± 20%; see also Table 2
). As assessed by CD34-immunohistochemistry and FVIII-rAG-staining, the BM MVD (events per field) was significantly lower in patients with AA compared to controls (CD34: controls, 5.9 ± 3.0 versus AA, 1.1 ± 0.7, P < 0.05; FVIII-rAG: controls, 4.7 ± 1.1 versus AA, 1.1 ± 0.7, P < 0.05) (Table 2
, Figure 1
). There was no apparent difference in the MVD when patients in various subcategories of AA (nsAA versus sAA/vsAA) were compared (Table 2)
. Figure 2
shows a BM islet with microvessels in a patient with AA. After successful ATG therapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, the MVD increased significantly (P < 0.05) (Figure 1)
.
|
|
|
In normal BM sections, megakaryocytes and immature myeloid (progenitor) cells were found to express VEGF as assessed by immunohistochemistry. By contrast, erythroid (progenitor) cells did not express detectable VEGF (Table 3)
. The staining reaction was completely abrogated by a VEGF-specific blocking peptide (not shown), thereby confirming the specificity of the staining reaction. In patients with AA, the levels of VEGF in BM sections were significantly lower compared to controls (score reactivity: AA, 1.25 ± 0.45 versus controls, 2.29 ± 0.49; P < 0.05) (Figure 3)
. Table 2
shows a summary of VEGF-staining results obtained in patients with AA. In patients with sAA and vsAA, the levels of VEGF in the BM were similar in range compared to patients with nsAA (sAA/vsAA, 1.4, versus nsAA, 1.3). After successful therapy (ATG/CSA or allogeneic stem cell transplantation), immunoreactive VEGF in BM sections was found to increase significantly (P < 0.05) (Figures 3 and 4)
.
|
|
Serum VEGF Levels in Patients with AA
Serum VEGF-A levels were found to be lower in patients with AA compared to age-matched healthy controls (AA, 51 ± 35 pg/ml versus controls, 444 ± 220 pg/ml; P < 0.05) (Figure 5)
. The levels of measurable VEGF-A were slightly lower in patients with sAA/vsAA compared to those recorded in patients with nsAA (sAA/vsAA, 47 ± 37 pg/ml versus nsAA, 53 ± 37 pg/ml). In three patients with AA and three healthy controls, plasma VEGF levels were determined. Similar to serum VEGF-A levels, the plasma levels of VEGF-A were significantly lower in patients with AA compared to healthy controls (AA, 15 ± 5 pg/ml versus controls, 77 ± 64 pg/ml; P < 0.05).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VEGF has recently been implicated in the control of growth and differentiation of most primitive hematopoietic progenitors in mice.29 Notably, VEGF has been described as an (intracellular) autocrine growth regulator of murine hematopoietic stem cells.29 More mature myeloid progenitors also express VEGF and VEGF receptors and thus may use this cytokine as an autocrine factor.30 Our data show that in patients with AA, the levels of VEGF are significantly lower compared to normal BM. However, based on our results, it could not be clarified whether the low VEGF level in AA was a consequence of aplasia (depletion of VEGF-expressing progenitors and megakaryocytes during evolution of AA) or was (in addition) a causative factor triggering BM aplasia. Because the data of Gerber and colleagues29,30 obtained with murine stem cells suggest that especially intracellular, VEGF is important for the proliferation and repopulation of myeloid progenitor cells, we favor the hypothesis that VEGF depletion is a consequence rather than a disease-triggering factor in patients with AA.
A number of recent studies have shown that VEGF-A is produced in megakaryocytes and myeloid progenitor cells under physiological conditions.21,23-25
However, vascular cells and other microenvironmental cells may also produce and secrete VEGF-A under various circumstances.31
Thus, little is known about the relative contribution of leukocyte- or megakaryocyte-derived VEGF to the baseline levels of VEGF-A detectable in the serum of healthy individuals. Our data show that VEGF-A levels are clearly lower in patients with AA compared to age-matched healthy controls. Based on this result, it is tempting to speculate that at least a significant proportion, if not all, of the VEGF-A in the serum of healthy individuals is derived from hematopoietic cells. An alternative explanation would be that certain hematopoietic cells also produce factors, such as cytokines, that regulate the production and/or secretion of VEGF in nonhematopoietic cells. In this regard it is noteworthy that tumor necrosis factor-
and interleukin-1
, both of which are produced in leukocytes, can induce expression and release of VEGF in mesenchymal cells.32,33
Another alternative possibility would be that leukocytes or leukocyte products inhibit the degradation or excretion of VEGF. The possibility that CSA (given to AA patients over many months) or G-CSF (administered to nine of our AA patients) directly induced the expression and secretion of VEGF in hematopoietic or nonhematopoietic cells must also be considered. In the case of CSA, it would be tempting to speculate that the beneficial effects of CSA in the treatment of AA might not be attributable to its immunosuppressive properties alone, but could also derive from its stimulatory effect on VEGF production in hematopoietic or nonhematopoietic cells.34,35
However, depending on the cell type and type of disease, CSA may display both VEGF-inducing and VEGF-suppressive activities in vivo.34-37
With regard to G-CSF, a direct effect of the cytokine on vessel growth must be considered.38
However, the MVD at remission in AA patients receiving G-CSF was within the same range, although slightly lower, compared to patients who did not receive G-CSF. Thus, the MVD increased in all patients with AA independent of the administration of G-CSF. An effect of CSA also seems unlikely but cannot be excluded with certainty because all patients received the drug.
At least four different VEGF species (VEGF-A, -B, -C, and -D) have been described.39-42 We were therefore interested in whether the decrease in VEGF-A in AA (compared to normal serum) was accompanied by a decrease in VEGF-D, which promotes lymphangiogenesis and is broadly expressed in diverse neoplastic and nonneoplastic tissues, in contrast to VEGF-A (expressed primarily in myeloid cells, plasma cells, megakaryocytes, and less abundantly in other mesenchymal cells).41,42
However, as expected, the levels of VEGF-D in AA were in the same range as that found in healthy controls. Whether lymphangiogenesis is normal or is reduced in patients with AA remains unknown. Based on our VEGF-D results, it may be concluded that at least the VEGF-D-dependent growth of lymphatic vessels is normal in these patients. Studies are under way to clarify this issue and the potential role of VEGF-D-dependent and -independent lymphangiogenesis in the pathogenesis of AA.
An interesting aspect of this study was that the BM cellularity in our AA patients correlated well with the VEGF score but did not correlate with MVD in the same way. This discrepancy may have several explanations. The most likely one may be that VEGF is primarily produced by hematopoietic cells in the BM, whereas microvessel growth and thus the MVD may be influenced not only by VEGF but also by other angiogenic cytokines and microenvironmental factors.
AA is a heterogeneous disease in terms of its pathogenesis, severeness, and response to immunosuppressive therapy.2-11 In our study, patients with nsAA, sAA, and vsAA were examined. In all three groups of patients, increases in the VEGF levels and in the MVD were seen after successful therapy. An interesting aspect of the study was that the increases were in the same range when comparing nsAA patients with sAA/vsAA patients. Thus, a very severe BM aplasia does not exclude a complete reconstitution of VEGF-expressing cells. On the other hand, it should be noted that only patients who showed a good response to therapy with ATG and CSA or stem cell transplantation were included in the present study.
Patients receiving allogeneic BM transplants may also have developing vessels in their BM because of transplanted CD34+ stem cells, as an example of postnatal vasculogenesis. Thus, transplanted stem cells may differentiate into two types of cells, namely specialized white blood cells and maturing endothelial progenitor cells, which work together to create new vessels that support growth of BM progenitors.43,44 In these patients, angiogenesis and vasculogenesis may co-exist in the BM and participate together in the increase of vessel counts. On the other hand, conditioning for stem cell transplantation may severely affect the BM microvasculature and thereby may counteract angiogenesis/vasculogenesis. We found that the BM MVD in patients with AA in remission was slightly lower (but not higher) in patients receiving a BM transplant compared to those receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy (not shown).
In summary, our data show that AA is associated with reduced expression of VEGF in the BM and reduced BM angiogenesis. This observation advances our knowledge about cytokine regulations in AA and may have implications for new concepts relating to the diagnosis and therapy of this disease. However, the exact pathogenetic significance of loss of VEGF in these patients remains to be determined.
|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Science, and Culture (grant GZ 200.062/2-VI/1/2002).
Accepted for publication September 6, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Wang, Y. Shiozawa, J. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Jung, K. J. Pienta, R. Mehra, R. Loberg, and R. S. Taichman The Role of CXCR7/RDC1 as a Chemokine Receptor for CXCL12/SDF-1 in Prostate Cancer J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4283 - 4294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nomura, W.-C. Huang, H. E. Zhau, D. Wu, Z. Xie, H. Mimata, M. Zayzafoon, A. N. Young, F. F. Marshall, M. N. Weitzmann, et al. {beta}2-Microglobulin Promotes the Growth of Human Renal Cell Carcinoma through the Activation of the Protein Kinase A, Cyclic AMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Axis Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7294 - 7305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |