| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |






nia Nosé

From the Department of Medical Oncology,* Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Howard Hughes Medical Institute
and the Department of Pathology,
Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Urology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; and the Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology,¶ Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunits of the heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). pVHL mutants linked to familial pheochromocyctoma (type 2C VHL disease), in contrast to classical VHL disease, appear to be normal with respect to HIF regulation. Using a simple method for identifying proteins that are differentially secreted by isogenic cell line pairs, we confirmed that the HIF targets IGBP3 and PAI-1 are overproduced by pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells. In addition, cells lacking wild-type pVHL, including cells producing type 2C pVHL mutants, were defective with respect to expression and secretion of clusterin, which does not behave like a HIF target. Decreased clusterin secretion by pVHL-defective tumors was confirmed in vivo by immunohistochemistry. Therefore, clusterin is a secreted marker for a HIF-independent pVHL function that might be especially important in pheochromocytoma development.
Genotype-phenotype correlations have emerged in VHL disease. VHL families can be subdivided into type 1 (low risk of pheochromocytoma) and type 2 (high risk of pheochromocytoma). Type 2 disease can be subdivided into type 2A (low risk of renal cell carcinoma) and type 2B (high risk of renal cell carcinoma).1 Some VHL families exhibit an increased risk of pheochromocytoma without the other hallmarks of VHL disease (type 2C). Almost all type 2 patients harbor VHL missense mutations, whereas null VHL alleles cause type 1 disease. This suggests that complete loss of pVHL function is incompatible with pheochromocytoma development or that pheochromocytoma in this setting reflects a mutant pVHL gain-of-function.
The best understood function of pVHL relates to its ability to target the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) for polyubiquitination and hence destruction.3
HIF consists of a labile
subunit and a stable ß subunit. In the presence of oxygen, HIF
subunits are enzymatically hydroxylated on specific prolyl residues. pVHL is the substrate recognition unit of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and binds directly to hydroxylated HIF. In cells that are hypoxic, or lack pVHL, HIF escapes destruction and is free to activate HIF target genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Glut1, and transforming growth factor-
. To date, all pVHL mutants linked to hemangioblastoma or renal cell carcinoma development are defective with respect to HIF regulation. In renal carcinoma nude mouse xenograft assays, suppression of HIF2
target genes is both necessary and sufficient for tumor suppression by pVHL.5-8
Collectively, these observations suggest that HIF2
is a critical downstream target of pVHL.
Several observations, however, suggest that pVHL has important functions in addition to its ability to down-regulate HIF. First, there is no evidence that forced activation of HIF target genes is sufficient to cause tumor growth and some evidence that it is not. For example, forced production of HIF1
in the skin or muscle leads to the elaboration of seemingly normal blood vessels without tumors.9,10
Second, both type 2A and type 2B pVHL mutants are defective with respect to HIF regulation, suggesting that a second, HIF-independent, function of pVHL relevant to kidney cancer is differentially altered by type 2A and 2B VHL mutations.11,12
Third, type 2C mutants retain the ability to down-regulate HIF, implying that a HIF-independent function is important for the development of pVHL-defective pheochromocytomas.11,12
Finally, Chuvash polycythemia patients do not appear to be tumor prone and yet are germline homozygotes for a VHL allele that is hypomorphic with respect to HIF regulation.13,14
Absence of tumor development in this setting might, among several possibilities, be due to preservation of a HIF-independent pVHL function.
A number of additional biochemical functions have been ascribed to pVHL, such as binding to atypical PKC family members, SP1, fibronectin, tubulin, RNA polymerase II subunits, VDU1 (and VDU2), VBP1, VHLaK, and MSH415-28 . There is evidence, for example, that pVHL can direct the polyubiquitylation of PKC family members and certain RNA polymerase subunits,20,22,29 can regulate transcriptional elongation through its association with elongin B and elongin C,30 can regulate microtubule stability through its interaction with tubulin,19 and can regulate extracellular matrix assembly.26,31,32 How and whether these different activities relate to tumor suppression by pVHL is still unknown.
We initially aimed to identify secreted proteins that reflect VHL gene status in hopes of developing a biomarker that could be used to monitor pVHL-defective tumors in vivo. Two of the first three markers we identified, IGFBP3 and PAI-1, are encoded by HIF-responsive genes33,34 and, accordingly, were increased in pVHL-defective cells. Control of PAI-1 mRNA by pVHL has already been described.35-37 The third marker, clusterin, was not under HIF control and was decreased in pVHL-defective tumor cells. Notably, every tumor-derived pVHL mutant examined, including those linked to type 2C disease, was defective with respect to clusterin production. These findings indicate that induction of clusterin reflects a HIF-independent pVHL function that may be important for tumor suppression, especially with respect to the development of pheochromocytoma. In addition to serving as a marker for this function, clusterin secretion might contribute to tumor suppression by pVHL because it has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation and promote apoptosis in certain settings.38-41
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The BamHI-EcoRI fragment from pRc-CMV-HA-VHL42
was subcloned into pBabe-puro to create pBabe-puro-HA-VHL. pBabe-puro-HA-HIF2
P531A and pBabe-puro-HA-HIF2
P531A bearing a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) mutation were described previously.5
Cell Culture
786-O and A498 renal cell carcinoma subclones stably transfected with either pRc-CMV (clones pRC3 and pRCB3, respectively) or pRc-CMV-HA-VHL (clones WT8 and WTD10, respectively)42,43 and 786-O subclones stably transfected to produce type 2C pVHL mutants (R64P, F119S, and L188V)12 were grown in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum supplemented with 1 mg/ml of G418 at 37°C in a humidified 10% CO2-containing atmosphere.
Retroviruses
Retroviral plasmids were transfected into the Phoenix packaging cell line using FuGene (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturers instructions. Tissue culture supernatant was harvested 48 hours later, passed though a 0.45-µm filter, and added to cells in the presence of 4 µg/ml polybrene. Infected cells were selected by growth in the presence of puromycin (1.5 µg/ml).
Cell Proliferation Assays
Renal cell carcinoma cells (104) were plated in 60-mm plastic dishes in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum supplemented with 1 mg/ml of G418 and allowed to adhere for 12 hours. The cells were then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and the medium was changed to DMEM containing 10 or 2.5% fetal bovine serum or Opti-MEM supplemented with 1 mg/ml of G418. At various time points thereafter, viable cells, as determined by exclusion of trypan blue, were counted using a hemocytometer.
Antibodies
Polyclonal anti-HA (Y-11), anti-clusterin (sc-6419), and anti-PAI-1 (sc-8979) antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Polyclonal anti-Glut1 antibody was obtained from Alpha Diagnostic Inc. (San Antonio, TX). Polyclonal anti-IGFBP3 and VEGF polyclonal antibodies were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Monoclonal Anti-HIF2
antibody (clone ep190b) was obtained from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO). Anti-tubulin monoclonal antibody (cloneB1.2.5) was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Immunoblot Analysis
Cells were lysed in EBC buffer (50 mmol/L Tris [pH 8.0], 120 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with complete mini protease cocktail (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Equivalent amounts of protein, as determined by the Bradford method, were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and wet-transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride filters (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The filters were blocked in Tris-buffered saline with 5% nonfat milk for 1 hour in room temperature and probed with the indicated antibodies in Tris-buffered saline (10 mmol/L Tris [pH 8] and 150 mmol/L NaCl) supplemented with 4% bovine serum albumin. Bound antibody was detected using Supersignal West Pico (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Cells were plated in 6-well plates (105 cells/well) and allowed to adhere for 24 hours before media replacement. At various time points thereafter, aliquots of media were removed, and VEGF and IGFBP3 ELISAs were performed using commercially available kits according to the manufacturers instructions (R&D Systems). Three independent wells were used for each set of experimental conditions.
Analysis of Proteins Secreted in the Supernatant (Trichloroacetic Acid [TCA] Precipitation)
Cells (2 x 106) were plated in a 100-mm dish in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum supplemented with 1 mg/ml of G418. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and the medium was changed to 10 ml of Opti-MEM supplemented with 1 mg/ml G418. Seventy-two hours later, the tissue culture supernatant from three plates was pooled, clarified by centrifugation at 2100 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C, and transferred to a 50-ml Oak Ridge Teflon FEP tube (Nalgene, Rochester, NY). Ice-cold TCA was added to a final concentration of 20%, mixed well, and left on ice for 20 minutes. Proteins were precipitated by centrifugation at 8400 x g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was washed once with
15 ml of ice-cold acetone followed by centrifugation at 8400 x g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was air dried in a fume hood for 1 hour and dissolved in 100 µl of EBC lysis buffer (300 mmol/L Tris [pH 8.0], 120 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with complete mini protease cocktail. The amount of protein precipitated was determined by the Bradford method before one-dimensional or two-dimensional gel analysis.
Two-Dimensional Protein Electrophoresis
Proteins were dissolved in the urea sample buffer provided in the MK-1 kit (Kendrick Labs, Madison, WI). Two-dimensional electrophoresis was performed according to the method of OFarrell44 by Kendrick Labs as follows. Isoelectric focusing was performed in glass tubes with an inner diameter of 2.0 mm using 2.0% pH 3.5 to 10 ampholines (LKB/Pharmacia) for 9600 volts/hour. After equilibration for 10 minutes in buffer 0 (10% glycerol, 50 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 2.3% SDS, and 0.0625 mol/L Tris [pH 6.8]), the tube gel was sealed to the top of the stacking gel of an SDS-10% polyacrylamide slab gel (0.75 mm thick). Electrophoresis was performed for about 4 hours at 12.5 mA/gel. The following proteins (Sigma) were added as molecular weight standards for the second dimension: myosin (220,000 d), phosphorylase A (94,000 d), catalase (60,000 d), actin (43,000 d), carbonic anhydrase (29,000 d), and lysozyme (14,000 d). After staining, the gels were dried between sheets of cellophane paper with the acid edge to the left.
Northern Blot Analysis
RNA was isolated using Nucleospin RNA II kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) according to the manufacturers protocol, resolved using a 1.2% agarose/formaldehyde gel (10 µg/lane), and blotted onto a nylon membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Germany) by capillary transfer. Hybridization was done using ExpressHyb hybridization solution (Clontech). The following probes were used: AvaII fragment of IGFBP3 cDNA, FokI fragment of PAI-1 cDNA, and BglI and HindIII fragment of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA. The clusterin probe was made by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of a clusterin cDNA using primers 5'-GTGCAATGAGACCATGATGG-3' and 5'-CAGGTAGTGGTAGGTATCCT-3').
VHL Genotyping
Genomic DNA was prepared from the freshly frozen tumor specimens by proteinase K/phenol-chloroform extraction. All three exons of the VHL gene were amplified by PCR using three sets of previously described primers45 followed by sequencing. The institutional review board of the Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine approved this study.
VHL Hypermethylation Assays
DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite as described previously.46 Briefly, 2 µg of DNA was incubated with 3 mol/L NaOH in a final volume of 20 µl for 15 minutes at 37°C. Freshly prepared 4.8 mol/L sodium bisulfite (278 µl) and freshly prepared 100 mmol/L hydroquinone (2 µl) were added, and the sample underwent 20 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds and incubation at 55°C for 15 minutes. The sample was desalted using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and desulfonated by incubation with 3 mol/L NaOH for 15 minutes at 37°C. The DNA was ethanol-precipitated and resuspended in 50 µl of water. The methylation status in the CpG island of VHL gene was determined by methylation-specific PCR as described previously.47
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed tissue obtained from the archives of Brigham and Womens Hospital, from Kyoto University Hospital, and from consultation. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut into 4-µm-thin sections, transferred to glass slides, and pretreated with a digital timed pressure cooker and Target Retrieval solution (Dakocytomation, Carpinteria, CA) before incubation with anti-clusterin antibody (1:4000 dilution; clone 41D; Upstate Cell Signaling) for 40 minutes at room temperature. Bound antibody was detected using the EVISION+ HRP detection system (Dakocytomation). Under these conditions, signals were not observed when duplicate samples were processed in parallel with the primary antibody omitted (data not shown). Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and normal adrenal glands were used as positive controls. Immunoreactivity was further graded semiquantitatively as follows: 1, no staining; 2, only membrane staining; 3, 1 to 10% cells staining, weak; 4, 1 to 10% cells staining, strong; 5, 11 to 50% cells staining, weak; 6, 11 to 50% cells staining, strong; 7, >51% cells staining, weak; and 8, >51% cells staining, strong.
In addition, samples were scored for Golgi clusterin staining (positive or negative) and for coarse granular clusterin staining (positive or negative). All tumors were scored independently by two of the authors (P.A. and V.N.) without knowledge of the VHL genotype. Statistical significance was determined with Fishers exact test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The abundance of an approximately 40-kd protein was reproducibly increased in the conditioned media of pVHL() cells compared with pVHL(+) cells (Figure 2a)
. Mass spectrometry of the corresponding protein band revealed the presence of both IGBP-3 and PAI-1. Increased production of IGFBP-3 and PAI-1 in the conditioned media of pVHL() cells was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Figure 2b)
and ELISA (Figure 2c)
. Because these two proteins co-migrated under these one-dimensional gel conditions, conditioned media from pVHL() and pVHL(+) cells were next resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and silver stained or transferred to nitrocellulose. Silver-stained images were pseudocolorized red (pRC3) or green (WT8) and superimposed in silico (Figure 3a)
. The spots corresponding to IGBP-3 and PAI-1 were confirmed by immunoblot analysis using antibodies that are specific for these two proteins (Figure 3, b and c)
. The identification of increased IGBP-3 and PAI-1 in the conditioned media of pVHL() cells further validated our assay, because it was established before that both are regulated by HIF and inhibited by pVHL.35-37
|
|
and a canonical HIF target, the Glut1 glucose transporter, were induced by hypoxia in pVHL(+) cells but not in pVHL() cells (Figure 5b)
|
|
P531A, which escapes recognition by pVHL and transcriptionally activates HIF target genes.5
WT8 cells infected with a DNA-binding defective version of HIF2
P531A (P531A + bHLH)5
or an empty retrovirus served as negative controls. As expected, both PAI-1 and IGFBP3 were induced by HIF2
P531A, in a DNA binding-dependent manner, to levels approximating those seen in pVHL() cells (pRC3) (Figure 5c)
Some naturally occurring VHL alleles cause familial pheochromocytoma without the classical signs of VHL disease (type 2C VHL disease). Type 2C pVHL mutants retain the ability to down-regulate HIF and its downstream targets.11,12
In contrast, we found that clusterin production was not restored in 786-O cells stably transfected to produce type 2C pVHL mutants such as pVHL R64P, F119S, or L188V (Figure 6)
. Every disease-associated pVHL mutant we have examined to date is quantitatively defective with respect to promoting clusterin secretion (data not shown). In contrast, clusterin levels in VHL+/+ ACHN and Caki renal carcinoma cells were similar to those in VHL/ cells engineered to produce wild-type pVHL (data not shown). Collectively, these results indicate that clusterin secretion is a biomarker for a HIF-independent function that is lost by tumor-associated pVHL mutants.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clusterin is ubiquitously expressed, with high levels in VHL target organs such as brain, liver, kidney, and adrenal medulla, and exists in both intracellular and secreted forms.52,53
Its predominant form is a secreted heterodimeric glycoprotein of 75 to 80 kd and is highly conserved across species, showing 70 to 80% identity at the amino acid level among mammals. Clusterin expression tends to increase with senescence or during cellular transformation, although whether such increases are causal with respect to these two cellular phenotypes is unclear.53
A variety of functions have been ascribed to clusterin, including both anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic activities in a context-dependent manner. For example, clusterin promotes chemoresistance in various models (anti-apoptotic activity), including renal carcinoma cells, whereas loss of clusterin promotes survival of hypoxic neurons (pro-apoptotic activity)53-56
. The latter is intriguing given the role of pVHL in oxygen sensing and also suggests that loss of clusterin might promote survival within the hypoxic zones of pVHL-defective solid tumors. Recent studies indicate that clusterin inhibits nuclear factor
B activity through stabilization of I
B.41
Therefore, loss of clusterin expression offers one explanation for why pVHL-defective tumor cells exhibit increased nuclear factor
B signaling and resistance to tumor necrosis factor-
.57,58
Clusterin has also been shown to decrease prostate cancer cell proliferation and neuroblastoma cell invasion in vitro.39-41
Therefore, it is conceivable that clusterin contributes to tumor suppression by pVHL in addition to serving as a marker for its integrity.
In one study, clusterin was found to be overexpressed in approximately 50% of nonpapillary renal cell carcinomas and to be associated with a poor prognosis.59 Although VHL status was not examined in this study, this number is consistent with earlier findings that VHL is mutated in a similar proportion of sporadic nonpapillary renal cell carcinomas.60 Based on our work, we would predict that the tumors characterized by clusterin "overexpression" would be those that retained wild-type pVHL. If true, this would be concordant with earlier studies showing that VHL+/+ renal cancers have a bad prognosis relative to renal cancers with VHL mutations.61
Clusterin is up-regulated by activated membrane-bound receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor and nerve growth factor receptors and by oncoproteins such as B-Myb and Src.53,62 Control of clusterin transcription is complex and involves transcription factors AP1, AP2, Sp1, NF1, and B-Myb. It will be important to determine whether pVHL regulates clusterin transcription, mRNA stability, or both and to determine which factor(s) links pVHL status to the production of clusterin mRNA.
It is currently unknown why certain germline VHL mutations predispose to pheochromocytoma and yet somatic VHL mutations are rare in sporadic pheochromocytoma (that is, in pheochromocytomas developing in the absence of a germline VHL mutation), in apparent violation of the Knudson two-hit model. In this regard, it is interesting that type 2C mutants are defective with respect to the production of two secreted proteins, clusterin and fibronectin, that might plausibly be linked to tumor suppression. In the germline setting, VHL haploinsufficiency might lead to impaired secretion of such proteins within an organ such as the adrenal medulla. In the sporadic setting, loss of secretion by a rare cell would presumably not lead to a phenotype because of normal protein secretion by its neighbors. Interestingly, NF1 is another gene linked to hereditary pheochromocytoma, and a role for haploinsufficiency has been demonstrated in mouse tumors developing after NF1 inactivation.63
It is possible that measurement of secreted biomarkers such as IGFB3, PAI-1, and clusterin in body fluids (for example, blood and urine) might be useful for monitoring pVHL-defective renal carcinomas. An immediate question is whether the IGFB-3 and PAI-1 isoforms secreted by renal cancer cells can be distinguished from those present in normal serum, which are largely derived from other organs such as the liver. In addition, identification of new VHL biomarkers might ultimately lead to appreciation of novel pVHL functions and hence new mechanistic insights into tumor suppression by pVHL and the basis for the genotype-phenotype correlations observed in VHL disease.
|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (to W.G.K.), the Kurozumi Medical Foundation (to E.N.), the Japanese Clinical Oncology Fund (to E.N.), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to E.N. and O.O.), and the Murray Foundation (to W.G.K.). E.N. is a recipient of fellowship support from the American Foundation for Urologic Disease and Yokoyama Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology. W.G.K. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator.
Current address of E.N.: Kyoto University, Koyoto, Japan.
Current address of K.K.: Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Related Commentary on page 367
Accepted for publication September 30, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Genes Dev 2001, 25202532This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Kawanishi, Y. Matsui, M. Ito, J. Watanabe, T. Takahashi, K. Nishizawa, H. Nishiyama, T. Kamoto, Y. Mikami, Y. Tanaka, et al. Secreted CXCL1 Is a Potential Mediator and Marker of the Tumor Invasion of Bladder Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 14(9): 2579 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tsutsumi, H. Kuwabara, T. Arai, Y. Xiao, and J. A. DeCaprio Disruption of the Fbxw8 Gene Results in Pre- and Postnatal Growth Retardation in Mice Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2008; 28(2): 743 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Li, L. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Yan, Y. A. Minamishima, A. F. Olumi, M. Mao, S. Bartz, and W. G. Kaelin Jr. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Linked to Differential Kidney Cancer Risk Seen with Type 2A and Type 2B VHL Mutations Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(15): 5381 - 5392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Fish, C. C. Matouk, E. Yeboah, S. C. Bevan, M. Khan, K. Patil, M. Ohh, and P. A. Marsden Hypoxia-inducible Expression of a Natural cis-Antisense Transcript Inhibits Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15652 - 15666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Pollard, M. El-Bahrawy, R. Poulsom, G. Elia, P. Killick, G. Kelly, T. Hunt, R. Jeffery, P. Seedhar, J. Barwell, et al. Expression of HIF-1{alpha}, HIF-2{alpha} (EPAS1), and Their Target Genes in Paraganglioma and Pheochromocytoma with VHL and SDH Mutations J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4593 - 4598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS |