| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

From the Institutes of Pathology* and Biometrics,
Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex meshwork comprising various types of collagens, laminin, entactin, heparan sulfate, and proteoglycans.8 The ECM is substantially involved in the interaction of hematopoietic cells and bone marrow stroma cells.9 In normal bone marrow, resident fibroblasts are responsible for constitutively synthesized collagens.10 Patients with cIMF either present with manifest myelofibrosis or present with a prefibrotic, cellular phase with no or only minute degrees of collagen fiber increase in the bone marrow.11,12 The onset of progressive deposition of collagens in prefibrotic cIMF is variable. Collagen type-3 (COL-3, also termed reticulin) and collagen type-1 (COL-1), synthesized by nonclonal fibroblasts, seem to be the predominant ECM components in the process of myelofibrosis.2
The family of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is comprised of more than 20 enzymes that can collectively degrade all components of the ECM.13 MMP-1, -8, -13, and -14 (MT1-MMP) are thought to be the most potent collagenolytic MMPs.13 Of note, MMP-1, -8, and -13 cleave the triple helix of collagens, thereby allowing the chains to unwind and become susceptible to further degradation by other MMPs. MMP-2 is a gelatinase but, in contrast to MMP-9, is also highly potent in the degradation of collagen types I, II, and III.13 It appears likely that an imbalance of ECM synthesis and activation of proteolytic enzymes paves the way for the increasing collagen meshwork in cIMF. Conversely, stem cell trafficking and angiogenesis as hallmarks in advanced cIMF stages require local matrix turnover, ie, proteolytic action, for full establishment.14 It has been demonstrated that the JAK-STAT pathway is involved in the activation of genes responsible for synthesis and secretion of MMPs.15,16 Besides revealing the role of JAKs and MMP activity in the physiological processes of hematopoiesis and differentiation, recruitment of this particular pathway has also been demonstrated during tumor invasion and neoangiogenesis.17-20 We tested the hypothesis of a potential correlation of an underlying JAK2 mutation in cIMF that leads to aberrant expression of MMPs, TIMPs, and COLs in different disease stages and during the course of the disease.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bone marrow trephines with proven cIMF were retrieved from the bone marrow registry of the Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School. Bone marrow trephines were routinely fixed in a solution containing phosphate-buffered formalin (pH 7.4) for 24 hours. The decalcification step was performed in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-based solution (pH 7.5) for up to 48 hours. The study group (n = 88) comprised cellular, prefibrotic cIMF (n = 31), advanced cIMF with manifest myelofibrosis (n = 33), and 24 control cases showing normal hematopoiesis. Based on the World Health Organization classification and in close agreement with clinical data and presentation, patient bone marrow trephines were initially diagnosed to have a cIMF in the years 2000 to 2004. In addition, sequential bone marrow trephines in two patients were investigated, representing follow-ups of 3 years. cIMF cases were re-evaluated and subdivided into two groups depending on the degree of myelofibrosis after silver impregnation (Gomori) as described.11,21
For a summary of patient clinical data, see Table 1
.
|
As we previously described,22
total RNA was extracted from total FFPE bone marrow cells after guanidinium isothiocyanate/proteinase K-based digestion and conventional organic extraction using phenol/chloroform. Total RNA (1 µg), pretreated with RNase-free (RNase) DNase (1 U/µg RNA, RQ1; Promega, Madison, WI), was transcribed into the complementary DNA using 500 ng of random hexamers (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) and 200 U of SuperScript II RNase reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) in a volume of 20 µl following the manufactures protocol. Negative controls were performed by using water instead of reverse transcriptase. Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI Prism 7700 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For sequences of PCR primers and TaqMan probes that amplify COL-1, COL-3, MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-13, MT1-MMP, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and the housekeeping gene ß-glucuronidase see Table 2
. The real-time PCR amplification was performed in a final reaction volume of 25 µl containing primers (250 nmol/L each), probe (150 nmol/L), 0.5 U of Platinum Taq polymerase (Invitrogen), 200 µmol/L each of dATP, dCTP, dTTP, and dGTP in 1x Platinum Taq reaction buffer and 4 µl of cDNA. The reaction mixture was preheated at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. Amplification for COL-1, COL-3, MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-13, MMP-14, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and ß-glucuronidase could be demonstrated to be linear throughout a broad concentration range, allowing relative quantification in two independent runs using the 
CT method as described.23,24
Briefly, the relative transcript level was expressed as the difference of the CT values: CT [target gene, control group] CT [housekeeping gene, control group] =
CT [control group]. To determine the case-specific gene expression in the control group, gene expression was correlated for every single control case relative to the mean value [=
CT(control group)]. The target gene expression in different disease stages of cIMF was calculated accordingly as described above: CT [target gene, cIMF case no. 1, 2, 3,... . ] CT [housekeeping gene, cIMF case no. 1, 2, 3,... . ] =
CT[cIMF case no. 1,2,3,... . . ]. To determine the case-specific gene expression in cIMF, every single case of a disease stage, ie, prefibrotic cIMF versus advanced cIMF, was calculated relative to the mean
CT [control group] as follows: fold change = 1.9 
CT, where 
CT stands for:
CT[cIMF case no. 1, 2, 3,... ]
CT [control group]. For example: 
CT = 3.5 means that this case expressed 9.5-fold more transcripts (1.9(3.5)) compared to the control group. For a comprehensive review of the equations underlying this quantification algorithm, see Livak and Schmittgen.23
|
The hotspot guanine-to-thymine point mutation in exon 12 of JAK2 destroys a relevant recognition site for the restriction enzyme BsaXI and avoids digestion of amplified JAK2 as described.5
We adopted this methodology for analysis of FFPE bone marrow cells.25
For DNA extraction from total bone marrow cells, one
10-µm slide was cut from the FFPE block before application of the DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturers instructions. PCR amplification of JAK2 was performed for 40 cycles in a GeneAmp PCR System 2700 (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) using 2.5 mmol/L magnesium chloride and 25 ng of DNA. Primers for JAK2 amplification covering the hotspot mutation site corresponding to nucleotide 55.061 (GenBank sequence AL161450) were: JAK2 forward 5'-TATGATGAGCAAGCTTTCTCACAAG-3', and JAK2 reverse 5'-AGAAAGGCATTAGAAAGCCTGTAGTT-3' generating a 102-bp product.
Ten µl of a given sample were incubated with 4 U of the restriction enzyme BsaXI (2 U/µl; New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) for 6 hours at 37°C in a PCR cycler with heated lid to avoid sample evaporation. The BsaXI enzyme recognized a site (5'... . 9(N) A C (N)5 C T C C (N)10... . 3'), which included the hotspot nucleotide 55.061 (GenBank sequence AL161450). For determination of BsaXI digestion in the respective JAK2 sequence, the NEBcutter 2.0 software tool was used (http://tools.neb.com/NEBcutter2/index.php). Samples analyzed by restriction site analysis were strictly accompanied by a positive control (JAK2 mutated cell line HEL) and a negative control (normal hematopoiesis).
JAK2 (V617F) Genotyping and Allele Quantification by Pyrosequencing
We established a pyrosequencing assay to quantify the percentage of mutant alleles in bone marrow cells from different disease stages of cIMF. The 102-bp fragment covering the hotspot point mutation (1849G>T) was amplified by PCR from 25 ng of genomic DNA with the primer combination used for BsaXI restriction site analysis with an additional 5'-biotin tag in a final volume of 50 µl. Forty-five µl of PCR product were mixed for 5 minutes (1200 rpm) at room temperature with 3.0 µl Streptavidin Sepharose HP (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) and 47 µl of binding buffer (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) using a thermomixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Using the Vacuum Prep tool (Biotage), single-stranded PCR products were prepared for sequencing analysis. Templates attached to the beads were washed with 70% ethanol for 5 seconds, denatured in 0.5 mol/L NaOH solution for 10 seconds, and washed in washing buffer (Biotage) for 5 seconds. Then the vacuum was switched off, and the beads were released into a PSQ 96 Plate Low (Biotage) containing 45 µl of annealing buffer (Biotage) and 500 nmol/L sequencing primer (5'-GGTTTTAAATTATGGAGTATGT-3', nucleotides 55.039 to 55.060 in GenBank AL161450).
The samples were heated to 80°C for 2 minutes and then cooled to room temperature. Pyrosequencing reactions were performed in a PSQ 96MA instrument (Biotage) according to the manufacturers instructions using the PyroGold SNP reagent kit (Biotage), which contains enzyme, substrate mixture, and nucleotides. Allele frequency was quantified using the SNP software (Biotage). As described, samples were scored as heterozygous for the JAK2 mutation if the percentage of mutant alleles exceeded 5%.26 Homozygosity was considered if the percentage of mutant T alleles exceeded 50%.4
Immunohistochemistry
To delineate cellular sources for MMP-14 (MT1-MMP), bone marrow showing cellular, prefibrotic cIMF (n = 10), advanced cIMF (n = 11), and control cases representing either normal hematopoiesis (n = 11) or reactive megakaryocytic hyperplasia (n = 10) were stained with a monoclonal anti-human MMP-14 antibody (MAB918; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) recognizing the catalytic domain of the mature peptide. Bone marrow sections (
2 µm) were stained with the Ready-to-use (Vector Laboratories). Vectastain ABC kit and the peroxidase DAB substrate kit (no. PK-7200 and no. SK-4100, respectively; R.T.U., Burlingame, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, sections were pretreated in citrate buffer, pH 6.0, in a microwave oven at 900 W and 750 W, 10 minutes each. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation with 3% H2O2 at room temperature for 10 minutes followed by incubation with normal horse serum for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight with the primary anti-human MMP-14 antibody at 4°C. After overnight incubation the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody and ABC components for 30 minutes each. DAB staining was performed for 2 minutes at room temperature followed by counterstaining using hemalum according to standard protocols. FFPE colon carcinoma tissue (R&D Systems) served as the positive control according to the distributors instructions. Negative controls were performed for each staining procedure by omitting the secondary antibody.
Statistical Analysis
To analyze differences of gene expression in cellular prefibrotic cIMF, advanced cIMF, and nonneoplastic hematopoiesis, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed followed by Mann-Whitney U-tests for pair-wise group differences (P values Bonferroni-adjusted). Kruskal-Wallis tests were also performed to analyze differences of gene expression in V617F JAK2-mutated and wild-type JAK2 in both cellular cIMF and advanced cIMF. P values
0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The overall frequency of V617F JAK2 mutations in the study group was 45% (9% homozygosity, 36% heterozygosity) in cellular cIMF and 53% (13% homozygosity, 40% heterozygosity) in advanced cIMF. Control cases under study showed entirely wild-type JAK2 (Table 3)
. Heterozygous V617F JAK2, homozygous V617F JAK2, and wild-type JAK2, as evidenced by our pyrosequencing assay, are shown in Figure 1
. Restriction site analysis and pyrosequencing rendered identical results. The JAK2 mutation status or the wild-type state did not correlate with expression of MMPs, TIMPs, and COLs except for TIMP-2, which showed a higher level in cellular cIMF cases with wild-type JAK2 (P = 0.003). A comprehensive analysis of potential correlation of JAK2 status and gene expression is summarized in Table 4
.
|
|
|
MMP-14 mRNA was demonstrated to be significantly overexpressed in advanced cIMF (n = 33) by up to sevenfold (median, 2.4; range, 0.5 to 7.1) compared to prefibrotic cIMF (median, 0.9; range, 0.3 to 2.0; P < 0.001; n = 31) and control hematopoiesis (median, 0.8; range, 0.5 to 2.0; P < 0.001; n = 17) (Figure 2F)
. MMP-13 mRNA levels showed differences between advanced cIMF (median, 4.6; range, 0.5 to 83.2; n = 32) and the cellular, prefibrotic phase (median, 0.7; range, 0.2 to 2.4; P < 0.001; n = 23). Normal hematopoiesis (median, 1.2; range, 0.2 to 4.3; n = 16) did not differ from either cIMF stage (Figure 2E)
. MMP-8 mRNA was significantly up-regulated in cellular, prefibrotic cIMF (n = 25) by up to sixfold (median, 2.2; range, 0.3 to 6.0) as compared to control hematopoiesis (median, 1.0; range, 0.3 to 2.8; P < 0.001; n = 24). Cellular cIMF and advanced cIMF (median, 1.2; range, 0.5 to 11.5; n = 15) did not differ significantly from each other (Figure 2D)
.
|
COL-3 mRNA was significantly increased in advanced cIMF by up to 76-fold (median, 5.3; range, 1.0 to 76.3; n = 33) compared to cellular, prefibrotic cIMF (median, 1.2; range, 0.3 to 4.3; P < 0.001; n = 31) and normal hematopoiesis (median, 0.6; range, 0.01 to 3.3; P < 0.001; n = 24). The latter did not differ from each other (Figure 1B)
. COL-1 gene expression in advanced cIMF (n = 33) was increased by up to 41-fold (median, 2.4; range, 0.4 to 41.0) as compared to the prefibrotic phase (median, 0.6; range, 0.1 to 9.8; P < 0.001; n = 31) and normal hematopoiesis (median, 1.2; range, 0.1 to 9.5; P = 0.03; n = 24) (Figure 2A)
.
MMP-2, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 mRNA Are Constitutively Expressed in cIMF and Normal Hematopoiesis
Prefibrotic cIMF (median, 1.7; range, 0.3 to 131.4; n = 21), advanced cIMF (median, 1.5; range, 0.1 to 7.8; n = 15), and control hematopoiesis (median, 1.3; range 0.3 to 5.7; n = 21) did not differ significantly from each other with regard to expression of MMP-2 mRNA (Figure 1C)
. TIMP-1 mRNA was also constitutively expressed to similar levels by bone marrow cells in cellular, prefibrotic cIMF (median, 1.0; range, 0.2 to 5.3; n = 21), advanced cIMF (median, 1.9; range, 0.8 to 5; n = 15), and control hematopoiesis (median, 1.3; range, 0.1 to 3.0; n = 21) without notable differences (Figure 2G)
. TIMP-2 mRNA in prefibrotic cIMF (median 1.1; range 0.3 to 2.3; n = 13), advanced cIMF (median, 1.0; range, 0.1 to 2.8; n = 14), and normal hematopoiesis (median, 1.0; range, 0.6 to 1.5; n = 10) also did not differ from each other (Figure 2H)
. For a comprehensive illustration of the entire spectrum of gene expression level, see Table 4
.
Dynamics of MMP, TIMP, and COL mRNA Expression during the Course of Disease in Progressive Myelofibrosis and Stable Prefibrotic Stages
At presentation of case 1, histopathological evaluation of the bone marrow revealed megakaryocytic and granulocytic proliferation suspicious for a prefibrotic cIMF (mf 0). A control biopsy taken 5 months later revealed prefibrotic cIMF without notable fiber deposition (mf 0). Consecutive sequential trephine biopsies 1 year (mf 2) and 3 years later (mf 3) showed progressive myelofibrosis. The onset of demonstrable fiber deposition was paralleled by increased expression of MMP-14, MMP-13, and COL-3 genes. The manifest myelofibrosis 3 years after initial diagnosis exhibited decreased TIMP-1 and MMP-8 levels (Figure 3)
.
|
|
An intense staining could be observed in advanced stages of cIMF with stronger labeling of megakaryocytes, granulocytic precursors, and endothelial lining of sinusoids (Figure 5A)
. In normal and reactive bone marrow, MMP-14 (MT1-MMP) immunohistochemistry revealed a weak and inconstant decoration of megakaryocytes (Figure 5B)
.
|
Two different primer systems for amplification of MMP-1 (Table 2)
in bone marrow cells were tested. The overall detection rate in a qualitative RT-PCR assay was 30% in both cIMF (n = 12) and normal hematopoiesis (n = 12). MMP-1 RT-PCR amplicons derived from cIMF and normal hematopoiesis were almost undetectable as demonstrated by comparison with MMP-1 amplicons derived from a fibroblast cell line (positive control; data not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We took advantage of recent progress in molecular analysis of FFPE trephine biopsies30 and investigated total bone marrow cells of prefibrotic and advanced cIMF for expression of collagens and a broad spectrum of MMPs that preferably degrade collagens. Because the JAK-STAT pathway has been demonstrated to be involved in the regulation of MMP genes and TIMPs,15-17 we further tested the hypothesis that cIMF cases showing the V617F JAK2 mutation might differ from wild-type JAK2 cases.
In addition to this, expression of the entire spectrum of MMPs and COLs under investigation showed no correlation to the absence or evidence of an underlying V617F JAK2 mutation in a given case. In particular, the state of zygosity in V617F JAK2 mutated cases in both cIMF groups had no effect on target gene expression. TIMP-2, but not TIMP-1, showed a rather higher expression in cellular cIMF with wild-type JAK2 compared to V617F JAK2 in this group but not in comparison to advanced cIMF and control cases. Not unexpectedly, COL-1 and -3 were increased in advanced cIMF, reflecting the ongoing process of collagen synthesis at this stage. Interestingly, in both prefibrotic and advanced cIMF, no MMP examined here showed a decreased expression compared to normal hematopoiesis. Most notably, MMP-14 and MMP-13 could be demonstrated to be significantly increased in advanced cIMF stages. MMP-14 exhibits various important properties including direct cleavage of collagen fibers, activation of other MMPs (such as MMP-13), and induction of angiogenesis.31
In contrast to previous studies that propagated the interaction of multiple MMPs such as MMP-2/MMP-9 and integrins for sufficient angiogenesis,32,33
more recent data have demonstrated the essential role for MMP-14 in this process.34
Tissues from MMP-14 knockout mice failed to develop vessels in collagen matrices whereas tissues from mice knocked out for MMP-2, MMP-9, and CD44 generated normal vessels. Increased angiogenesis is a hallmark in the bone marrow architecture of advanced cIMF as demonstrated by increased microvessel density or labeling of endothelial osteoprotegerin.35,36
Besides megakaryocytes and myeloid precursor cells, we probably unmasked endothelial cells in advanced cIMF as a major source for MMP-14, suggesting its impact on proliferating vessels in the disease course (Figure 5)
. Because hematopoietic and endothelial progenitor cells are regularly increased in the peripheral blood of patients with cIMF,37
MMP-14 might play a central role in abnormal cell trafficking. This hypothesis is supported by the conclusion of a previous study that a cell-bound MMP could be involved in increased mobilization of cIMF progenitors.14
Moreover, a recent study revealed MMP-14 as the key pericellular collagenolysin in the process of pathological vessel remodeling and angiogenesis.38
The investigation of COLs and MMPs in both disease stages of cIMF represents only a snap-shot in the dynamic process of matrix remodeling. To gain more insight into the intraindividual expression, we selected two disease courses showing either progressive myelofibrosis or persistence of the prefibrotic stage in a comparable time frame. Clear differences in the expression of MMPs (MMP-14, MMP-13, MMP-2) and both COLs were demonstrable between the two courses. Different dynamics in gene expression and the missing correlation of JAK2 status and fibrosis were evident, but investigation of a larger series of sequential biopsies in the course of cIMF is needed to prove reproducibility. Accordingly, these figures per se do not allow us to decide on a course in a prospective manner. In general, it is difficult to illustrate the dynamics of ECM remodeling appropriately because activation of latent MMPs is required but not sufficiently demonstrable, neither by gene expression nor by immunohistochemistry. However, as demonstrated not only for single-case analysis but also in the two courses, the increased MMP-14 levels in progressive myelofibrosis shed light on a probably important candidate in this process.
There is no doubt that MMPs and TIMPs represent only two important systems14,27-29 in the complex network of proteolytic enzymes and specific inhibitors. Other factors such as the uPA/plasminogen/plasmin/PAI system, elastases, or stromelysins concomitantly interact in the process of ECM remodeling in cIMF. In addition, deposition of matrix components such as collagens in cIMF is boosted by cytokine action such as interleukins thereby further complicating the network of aberrant mechanisms.
Of note, the presence of the JAK2 (V617F) mutation in all cases under investigation did not correlate with a case-specific fibrogenic potential. In a larger series of sequential biopsies in cIMF not yet investigated for targets involved in ECM remodeling, progressive myelofibrosis was also demonstrable in JAK2 wild-type cases (such as no. 1, Figure 3
) or longer lasting prefibrotic stages (such as no. 2, Figure 4
) showing JAK2 mutation at initial diagnosis (not published). Therefore, constitutive catalytic activity mediated by mutated JAK2 does not seem to be required for any fibrogenic signals.
We conclude that ECM remodeling in disease stages of cIMF is reflected by aberrant expression of defined collagenase subsets independent of an underlying V617F JAK2 mutation.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung 10-2191 to O.B. and H.K.).
Accepted for publication April 27, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-J. Lataillade, O. Pierre-Louis, H. C. Hasselbalch, G. Uzan, C. Jasmin, M.-C. Martyre, M.-C. Le Bousse-Kerdiles, and on behalf of the French INSERM and the European EU Does primary myelofibrosis involve a defective stem cell niche? From concept to evidence Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3026 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bock, J. Hoftmann, K. Theophile, K. Hussein, B. Wiese, J. Schlue, and H. Kreipe Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Are Overexpressed in the Bone Marrow of Primary Myelofibrosis and Are Apparently Induced by Fibrogenic Cytokines Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 172(4): 951 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoffman and D. Rondelli Biology and Treatment of Primary Myelofibrosis Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 346 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |