| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


From the Departments of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology,* Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics,
and Epidemiology,
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Potentially important in this subset of patients are the Src family of kinases (SFKs), which include at least nine nonreceptor tyrosine kinases that function as gatekeepers for many signaling pathways that regulate cancer progression from initiation to metastasis.8,9
Overexpression or hyperactivity of SFKs is common in human epithelial tumors, including NSCLCs.10
One SFK, c-Src, has been functionally linked with EGFR. Concurrent overexpression of c-Src and EGFR has been found in
70% of breast cancers, and the biological synergy between these two tyrosine kinases has been demonstrated in human breast cancer tissues and cell lines.11
c-Src becomes transiently activated on association with activated EGFR and phosphorylates multiple downstream targets, including EGFR itself.12
EGFR can be phosphorylated on multiple sites by c-Src, most notably Tyr845.11
Tumors with activated EGFR have enhanced c-Src kinase activity, and inhibition of c-Src can reverse the transformed properties of cells overexpressing EGFR.13
In cancer cells that express high EGFR, inhibition of c-Src expression induces apoptosis by decreasing activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3, a downstream mediator of c-Src, and the prosurvival molecule Bcl-XL.13
Thus, EGFR and c-Src interact bidirectionally and synergistically, and c-Src may be an important prosurvival mediator of EGFR.
Given the importance of EGFR in maintaining NSCLC cell survival and the role of interactions between c-Src and EGFR in maintaining the survival of other tumor types, in this study we sought to examine the role of SFKs in NSCLC cells, which has not been fully defined. We analyzed SFK phosphorylation in NSCLC biopsy samples, using a large repository of tissues annotated for relevant histological and clinical variables. We subsequently investigated SFK phosphorylation in NSCLC cell lines with activating mutations in EGFR and the role of SFKs in the survival of these cells by using genetic and pharmacological approaches to inhibit SFK expression and activity. We conclude that SFKs are phosphorylated in tumors from a subset of NSCLC patients, contribute to the survival of EGFR-dependent NSCLC cells, and should be investigated as therapeutic targets in NSCLC patients.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We purchased rabbit polyclonal antibodies against Tyr1068-phosphorylated EGFR (PY1068-EGFR), Tyr1086-phosphorylated EGFR (PY1086-EGFR), PY416-pan-SFK (P-SFK), total SFK (SC-18), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), caspase 3, PY877-ErbB2, PY1289-ErbB3, PY705-STAT3, PS473-AKT, total AKT, PT202/204-ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), and anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies from Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA); polyclonal antibodies against total ErbB2, ErbB3, and pan-SFKs and monoclonal antibody against total ERK1/2 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); rabbit polyclonal antibody against total EGFR from NeoMarkers (Fremont, CA); rabbit polyclonal antibody against pY845-EGFR from Biosource International (Camarillo, CA); and mouse monoclonal antibody against ß-actin from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, MO).
Tissue Microarrays
All samples were obtained from patients who had undergone lung resection at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for removal of NSCLC. Based on pathological staging, the majority (84%) of patients had early-stage (I or II) disease. None had received neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Only patients for whom signed informed consent and pertinent clinical data were available were included. Grading of histological change was performed as previously described by a single investigator (I.W.).14 Tissue microarrays were prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks of resected samples from 370 patients with NSCLC using triplicate 1-mm-diameter cores per tumor, obtaining tissues from central, intermediate, and peripheral tumor areas.
Immunohistochemical Analysis
After paraffin removal and hydration, slides were steamed for 15 minutes (Handy Steamer Plus; Black & Decker, Towson, MD) to induce epitope retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched by immersing the slides in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 minutes at room temperature. The slides were rinsed three times with Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20, and protein blocker (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) was applied for 20 minutes. After being rinsed another three times, the slides were incubated with primary antibody against PY416-SFK overnight at 4°C, rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/Tween 20, and then incubated with DakoEnvision Dual Link System Plus (k4063; DAKO) for 30 minutes, rinsed, and incubated in the substrate peroxide and the chromogen diaminobenzidine per the manufacturers instructions (DAKO). The slides were then rinsed, counterstained with hematoxylin for 30 seconds, rinsed in deionized water, dehydrated through graded ethanol solutions, cleared in xylene, and mounted. Blocking peptide and absence of primary antibody were used as negative controls for the antibodies. P-SFK staining was quantified based on the percentages of cells staining positively in cytoplasmic, membranous, or both compartments. For each tumor, the P-SFK score was defined as the average of the three core samples. A tumor was considered positive if at least 10% of the cells demonstrated staining.
Cell Lines
The NSCLC cell lines HCC827, HCC2279, H3255, H1975, H1819, and H1299 were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). These cell lines were treated with the SFK inhibitors PP1 [4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; Tocris Pharmaceuticals, Ellisville, MO] and SKI-606 (4-anilino-3-quinolinecarbonitrile; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA) or the EGFR TKI gefitinib (AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE).
Western Blotting
Mid-log phase NSCLC cells were seeded at 50 to 70% confluence, cultured for 48 hours, serum-starved for 24 hours, and treated with PP1 (0, 0.1, 1, and 10 µmol/ml) for 60 minutes followed by 50 ng/ml of EGF for 60 minutes (for HCC827, H3255, HCC2279, and H1819) or 5 minutes (for H1299), which were the time points at which EGF maximally increased EGFR phosphorylation in these cell lines. As a control, cells were treated with the same concentration of the vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Cells were then washed with ice-cold PBS and solubilized in lysis buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1 mmol/L sodium fluoride, 1 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail I (P-2850; Sigma), and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail II (P-5726; Sigma). This suspension was frozen at 80°C, thawed, and then subjected to brief sonication.
Protein concentrations were estimated with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and equal amounts of protein were denatured and reduced with a sample buffer containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 2.5% 2-mercaptoethanol. After boiling for 5 minutes, aliquots of the samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 6% or 8% polyacrylamide gels containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. The fractionated proteins were transferred onto Immun-Blot polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) at 300 mA for 3 hours in 0.5x transfer buffer (12.5 mmol/L Tris, 100 mmol/L glycine, and 20% methanol, pH 8.3) with a semidry transfer cell unit (Bio-Rad). After the membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 (125 mmol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L Tris, and 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.5) for 1 hour at room temperature, the membrane was probed with a 1:1000 dilution of primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. This was followed by incubation with anti-rabbit (1:2000) or anti-mouse (1:4000) secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature and visualization by an ECL or ECL Plus Western blotting detection system (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ).
Cell Proliferation Assays
Cells were seeded at a density of 1000 to 5000 cells per well in 96-well plates and allowed to attach for 24 hours. The cells were then treated with the gefitinib, PP1, or both in the presence of 10% serum for 5 days, at the end of which the cell proliferation reagent WST-1 (4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzene di-sulfonate) was added to each well, as specified by the supplier (Roche, Nutley, NJ). After a 4-hour incubation, the percentages of cell densities for each treatment group, relative to the cell densities in control (DMSO-treated) cultures, were determined by measuring WST-1 absorbance at 450 nm. All cell proliferation data shown are the means of four measurements and are representative of three independent experiments.
Apoptosis Assays
Mid-log phase HCC827 and H3255 cells at 80% confluence were treated with gefitinib (5 nmol/L), PP1 (1 µmol/L), both, or vehicle for 2 days. The adherent and floating cells were then pooled and evaluated for induction of apoptosis by Western analysis to detect PARP and caspase-3 cleavage and by flow cytometric analysis of cells subjected to a terminal dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL)-based assay (Apo-BRDU kit; Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA). For the TUNEL assay, the cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde containing PBS and then in 70% ethanol, washed, and labeled with bromodeoxyuridine. After additional washing, labeled cells were treated with fluorescein-labeled anti-bromodeoxyuridine monoclonal antibody and propidium iodide/RNase solution before flow cytometric analysis (BD Calibur, San Jose, CA) to determine the percentage of apoptotic cells. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Transfection of c-Src Short Hairpin RNA (shRNA)
pRS (retroviral-silencing) c-Src shRNAs were purchased from OriGene, Rockville, MD. Sh-Src target sequences were: A: 5'-AGAGGGCGGGCCCGCTGGCCG-3'; C: 5'-CTTAGACCTGAGGGACCCTTC-3'; D: 5'-GGGGACCCCTGGCTCTGGGCC-3'. PT67 fibroblasts (Becton Dickson, Mountain View, VA) were transfected with a single Src shRNA construct (A, C, or D) and selected for 3 to 4 weeks in 2 µg/ml of puromycin to generate mass populations of retrovirus-producing cells. Viral particles in supernatants from PT67 cells were concentrated using a 0.45-µm filter. HCC827 cells were exposed to retrovirus expressing Src shRNA (A, C, or D) or empty vector in the presence of 5 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma) for 4 to 6 hours. The media were then replaced with fresh media containing retrovirus, and the transfectants were incubated overnight. This transfection process was repeated three times to increase the transfection efficiency. Transfectants were then selected with 1 µg/ml puromycin for 3
4 weeks, and mass populations were used in experiments.
Transfection of EGFR and c-Src Constructs
H1299 cells were transfected with EGFR constructs (wild-type or mutant
746-750), dominant-active mutant c-Src (Y527F), or empty vector (pCDNA3.1 and pLHCX for EGFR and c-Src, respectively). Stable transfectants were selected in 500 µg/ml G418 for 3 to 4 weeks, and single-cell subclones were isolated and expanded for use in experiments.
Statistical Analysis
For the immunohistochemical studies, the primary objective was to correlate P-SFK membrane scores with clinical variables (gender, pathological stage, smoking history, duration of survival, and tumor histology). Included in the analysis were 370 patients. Summary statistics were used to summarize clinical factors and biomarker measurements. Fishers exact test was used to correlate membranous and cytoplasmic staining. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the two-way comparisons. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS Release 8.02 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), and graphs were produced using S-Plus version 6.1 (Insightful Corp., Seattle, WA). P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
For studies examining the anti-proliferative effects of kinase inhibitors on cell lines, cell density values were calculated from five replicate wells per condition, and data illustrated were representative of three independent experiments. IC50 values were determined from a sigmoidal dose-response curve fit to data (percent inhibition versus the log of the concentration). P values were calculated using the two-way analysis of variance test. To examine synergistic interactions between PP1 and gefitinib in cell lines, the Chou and Talalay15 combination index analysis was used. A combination index score of 1 is defined as the expected additive effect of two drugs. Synergism is defined as a combination index score of less than 1. CalcuSyn software (Cambridge, UK) was used to calculate the combination index.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SFKs are recruited to the cytoplasmic membrane by receptor tyrosine kinases where they undergo activation through a series of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events.8,9 Tyr416 is an autophosphorylation site that is highly conserved among Src family members.8,9 Phosphorylation at this site is reported to initiate a conformational reorganization of the kinase activation loop, leading to relief of the steric barrier for substrate binding and activation of Src tyrosine kinase.16 To investigate SFK activation in NSCLC, we first performed immunohistochemical analysis of NSCLC biopsy samples using a pan-SFK antibody that detects Tyr416 phosphorylation (P-SFK) and quantified staining in the cytoplasmic and membranous compartments. For these studies, we used a tissue microarray constructed from 370 randomly collected NSCLC biopsy samples. The tumors had been annotated for patients clinical variables (age, gender, smoking status, disease stage, and duration of survival) and tumor histological features (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma).
Relevant positive controls (Western blotting of cells transfected with dominant-active mutant c-Src) and negative controls (immunohistochemical staining of tissues in the absence of primary antibody and preincubation of primary antibody with blocking peptide) confirmed the specificity of the antibody for P-SFK (Figure 1, A and B)
. The staining varied in intensity and extent among tumor biopsy samples and was detected in both cytoplasmic and membranous compartments (examples of staining for P-SFK are shown in Figure 1C
). Of the 370 tumors examined, 123 (33%) stained positively, 105 (28%) were positive both in cytoplasm and membrane, four (1%) were positive in cytoplasm only, 14 (3.8%) were positive in membrane only, and 247 (67%) were negative for staining. Staining in membrane and cytoplasm was highly correlated (P < 0.001). Staining was associated with several clinical variables (Table 1)
, including male gender (P = 0.001), active smoking (P = 0.03), and squamous cell subtype (P < 0.001) but not ethnicity, pathological stage of disease, or duration of survival (data not shown). Thus, P-SFK staining was detected in a subset of NSCLC biopsy samples.
|
|
Increased SFK Phosphorylation in EGFR-Dependent NSCLC Cell Lines
Based on the above findings, we postulated that a subset of NSCLC cell lines has increased phosphorylation of SFKs. We investigated SFK phosphorylation in a panel of NSCLC cell lines that included ones that have constitutive EGFR activation and are dependent on EGFR for survival (HCC827, H3255, HCC2279, and H1975).3,17
The other cell lines in the panel (H1299 and H1819) are relatively resistant to EGFR TKIs and have wild-type EGFR.3
Cells were grown in the absence of serum for 48 hours to remove exogenous activators of SFKs. Under these conditions, SFK phosphorylation was robust in HCC827 cells, H3255 cells, and HCC2279 cells, was detected at lower levels in H1975 cells, and was undetectable in H1299 cells and H1819 cells (Figure 2A)
. Thus, among the cell lines examined here, SFK phosphorylation was increased in EGFR-dependent cells.
|
SFK Inhibitors Induce Apoptosis of NSCLC Cell Lines
We next examined the sensitivity of these cell lines to treatment with the SFK inhibitors PP118-20
or SKI-606.21
PP1 decreased P-SFK levels (Figure 3A)
and cell numbers (Figure 3B)
in a dose-dependent manner, with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values ranging from 1.2 to 8.6 µmol/L (a 7.2-fold difference). HCC827 cells and H3255 cells had the lowest PP1 IC50 values, and their sensitivities differed significantly (P < 0.001) from those of H1299, H2279, H1819, and H1975 cells. The pattern of sensitivity to SKI-606 was similar to that of PP1: HCC827 cells and H3255 cells were the most sensitive, H1299 cells were the most resistant, and the other cell lines demonstrated intermediate sensitivity (Figure 3B)
. Because both of these compounds inhibit c-Abl, we sought to exclude the involvement of c-Abl in maintaining the survival of HCC827 cells and H3255 cells by treating them with imatinib, a potent c-Abl inhibitor. When administered at doses up to 10 µmol/L, imatinib had no effect on cell proliferation (data not shown), suggesting that c-Abl is not required for the survival of HCC827 cells and H3255 cells. We next examined NSCLC cell lines for evidence of apoptosis after treatment with SFK inhibitors. Treatment with PP1 or SKI-606 resulted in cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP in HCC827 cells, H3255 cells, and HCC2279 cells but not H1299 cells (Figure 3C)
. Thus, NSCLC cell lines with constitutive phosphorylation of SFKs underwent apoptosis after treatment with these SFK inhibitors.
|
The proapoptotic effects of PP1 raised the possibility that SFKs promote the survival of these cells. However, these findings did not exclude the possibility that PP1 induced apoptosis through SFK-independent mechanisms. To address this question, we depleted c-Src from HCC827 cells by stably transfecting them with c-Src shRNA to derive clones that do not require c-Src for survival. We chose to target c-Src as opposed to other SFKs because it is the Src family member previously reported to regulate the phosphorylation of EGFR,8,9 a crucial prosurvival mediator in HCC827 cells. We used several shRNA constructs (A, C, and D) targeting different c-Src coding sequences to examine whether c-Src depletion by different shRNA sequences induced consistent biological effects.
Four HCC827 transfectants (three shRNA constructs and one empty vector control) were selected for further study. Relative to its expression in control cells, c-Src was strikingly reduced in the three c-Src shRNA transfectants (Figure 4A)
, whereas expression of other SFKs (Lyn, Fyn, Yes) was unchanged (data not shown). P-SFK expression was reduced in c-Src shRNA transfectants (Figure 4A)
, but the residual P-SFK in c-Src-depleted cells is consistent with expression of other SFKs. Using this model, we investigated whether c-Src was required for the sensitivity of HCC827 cells to PP1. PP1 treatment decreased the numbers of c-Src-depleted cells, but their sensitivity was diminished relative to that of controls (Figure 4B
; P < 0.001 for shRNA A, C, or D versus parental cells). Thus, PP1 mediated its effects through c-Src-dependent and -independent mechanisms in HCC827 cells.
|
The two cell lines (HCC827 and H3255) we found to be most sensitive to SFK inhibitors are highly dependent on EGFR for survival,3
raising the possibility that PP1 induced apoptosis through effects on EGFR, its dimeric partners (ErbB2 and ErbB3), or both. To test this, we examined whether PP1 decreased the phosphorylation of Src substrates on EGFR (Y845 and Y1068) and ErbB2 (Y877).22-24
PP1 prominently decreased the phosphorylation of EGFR and ErbB2 at these sites (Figure 5A)
. We also examined the phosphorylation of ErbB3 (Y1289), a docking site for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase,25
which is phosphorylated by EGFR or ErbB2 through dimeric interactions with ErbB3. PP1 decreased ErbB3 phosphorylation at this site in HCC827 cells and H3255 cells (Figure 5A)
. In contrast, PP1 minimally decreased phosphorylation of these sites in H1819 cells (Figure 5A)
, HCC2279 cells, H1975 cells, and H1299 cells (data not shown). Thus, PP1 prominently inhibited ErbB phosphorylation in the two NSCLC cell lines that were most highly sensitive to PP1.
|
PP1 and Gefitinib Are Synergistic in NSCLC Cells
Based on the above finding that PP1 induced apoptosis in NSCLC cells that are highly sensitive to EGFR TKIs, we postulated that combined treatment with gefitinib enhances apoptosis induced by PP1. Consistent with this hypothesis, the combination caused more striking reductions in cell numbers than the effects of either drug alone in HCC827 cells and H3255 cells (Figure 6A)
. In fact, these compounds had synergistic effects, with combination index values of 0.6 and 0.91 for HCC827 cells and H3255 cells, respectively. In contrast, there was no synergy observed in the other four cell lines examined (data not shown). Using low doses of gefitinib and PP1 that were insufficient to induce apoptosis when administered singly, the combination was sufficient to induce apoptosis of HCC827 cells by TUNEL staining and cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP (Figure 6, B and C)
. Relative to the effect of either drug alone, the combination more potently suppressed phosphorylation of ERK, STAT3, and cyclin D1, which are known downstream mediators of EGFR and c-Src (Figure 6D)
.25-29
Thus, the combination of PP1 and gefitinib had synergistic effects in HCC827 cells.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings differ from that of Masaki and colleagues,10 who found SFK activation to be more common in lung adenocarcinomas than in squamous cell carcinomas. These studies have several important differences that may have contributed to their divergent outcomes. First, Masaki and colleagues10 used NSCLC specimens from patients of Asian descent, whereas the patients in our study were primarily Western in origin. Recent findings have shown that ethnicity plays an important role in determining the biology of NSCLC. For example, EGFR mutations are more common in adenocarcinomas arising in patients from Asian background than in adenocarcinomas derived from Western patients.33 Based on our findings, the presence of EGFR mutations is associated with high SFK activity. Thus, one conceivable explanation for the correlation of SFK activation with different histological subtypes in the two studies may be related to the studies relative frequencies of EGFR-mutant tumors. Second, our tissue microarray contained more squamous cell tumors than the Masaki and colleagues10 cohort did (109 versus 12, respectively); thus, our study may have had greater power than that of Masaki and colleagues to detect a subset of squamous cell tumors with high SFK activity.
Several lines of evidence reported here support cooperative effects between EGFR and SFKs in NSCLC cell survival. First, the cell lines that required SFKs for survival were also EGFR-dependent. Second, depletion of c-Src from HCC827 cells reduced sensitivity to the anti-proliferative effects of PP1 or gefitinib. These findings extend previous reports that EGFR and c-Src cooperate in cancer cells. For example, cells genetically engineered to overexpress EGFR and c-Src have enhanced DNA synthesis, soft agar colony formation, and tumorigenicity in nude mice relative to cells that overexpress only one of the two molecules.34 Further, EGFR and c-Src are both overexpressed in a subset of breast cancer cells, which have enhanced EGFR-dependent signaling and tumorigenicity relative to other breast cancer cells that do not overexpress both proteins.35,36 Thus, a growing body of evidence supports the hypothesis that c-Src and EGFR cooperate in cellular transformation and in maintaining cell survival.
Several studies have reported that SFKs are upstream activators of ErbB complexes.8,9 In support of these findings, here we demonstrated phosphorylation of known Src substrates on ErbB family members in NSCLC cell lines with constitutive SFK phosphorylation, and PP1 treatment of HCC827 cells and H3255 cells decreased the phosphorylation at these sites. In support of a role for c-Src in PP1 actions, c-Src depletion in HCC827 cells decreased the phosphorylation of Y845-EGFR and Y877-ErbB2. However, in c-Src depleted cells we did not detect a decrease in the phosphorylation of Y1068-EGFR, which differs from a previous report that Y1068-EGFR is a c-Src substrate in glioblastoma cells,23 raising the possibility that, in HCC827 cells, a Src kinase family member other than c-Src phosphorylates Y1068-EGFR and that the role of c-Src at EGFR Y1068 is dependent on the cellular context. However, we have not excluded the possibility that our experimental conditions were not sufficiently sensitive to detect a change in Y1068-EGFR phosphorylation; for example, detection of change might be enhanced by the use of single cell subclones of c-Src shRNA transfectants (as opposed to mass transfectant populations). Given the ability of PP1 to inhibit the phosphorylation of EGFR and ErbB2, we next examined Y1289-ErbB3, which is phosphorylated by EGFR or ErbB2 through dimeric interactions with ErbB3. PP1 decreased phosphorylation of Y1289-ErbB3 in HCC827 cells and H3255 cells, and this effect was not recapitulated in HCC827 cells by c-Src depletion. Together, these findings suggest that PP1 mediated its effects through c-Src-dependent and -independent mechanisms. However, we have not excluded the possibility that PP1 and SKI-606 have direct inhibitory activity against EGFR or other ErbB family members in cells.
Other studies have shown that SFKs are downstream mediators of ErbBs. For example, in squamous-cell carcinoma cell lines, EGFR activation increases SFK phosphorylation, which is required for EGFR-induced phosphorylation of STATs and calveolin-1, cleavage of EGFR proligands, and tumor cell proliferation and invasion.29-31
Further, ErbB2 is reported to activate c-Src.36,37
Consistent with these reports, we found that NSCLC cell lines with constitutive EGFR activity also had high P-SFK phosphorylation. However, stable transfection of H1299 cells with a mutant EGFR expression construct (
746-750) that is identical to the mutation in HCC827 cells was not sufficient to increase SFK phosphorylation (data not shown), indicating that other signals are required. Elucidating the upstream activators of SFKs in EGFR-dependent NSCLC cells will require further study.
One of the clinical implications from this study is that SFK inhibitors may be useful in the treatment of NSCLC patients. The cell lines most sensitive to treatment with SFK inhibitors had high P-SFK expression and were dependent on EGFR for survival, raising the possibility that assays to measure the phosphorylation of SFKs and EGFR in tumor biopsies may predict efficacy to treatment with SFK TKIs in NSCLC patients. Combined treatment with PP1 and gefitinib demonstrated synergy in HCC827 cells, supporting combination strategies to target both SFKs and EGFR in NSCLC patients as a way to enhance the efficacy of EGFR TKI alone, which heretofore has not been curative even in patients with EGFR-dependent tumors. However, in our study, synergy between PP1 and gefitinib was not observed in all EGFR-dependent NSCLC cell lines, indicating that combined treatment with SFK and EGFR TKIs may not be effective in all NSCLC patients with EGFR-dependent tumors. Consistent with our findings, dasatinib, a Src TKI that is currently under investigation in patients with a variety of tumor types, was recently reported to induce apoptosis in NSCLC cell lines that depend on EGFR for survival.38
In patients who have an activating EGFR mutation and initially benefit from EGFR TKI, the disease typically recurs and is characterized by the emergence of TKI-resistant clones that carry an additional EGFR mutation at T790, also called the gatekeeper residue, which is known to be an important determinant of inhibitor binding in the context of multiple kinases.20 In H1975 cells, which have an activating EGFR mutation as well as a T790M mutation, the addition of PP1 only modestly enhanced the efficacy of gefitinib (data not shown), suggesting that this combination may not be an effective salvage regimen in patients who experience recurrence after EGFR TKI. These questions will require further investigation by performing clinical trials in NSCLC patients to test the efficacy of strategies that inhibit SFKs, EGFR, and the combination.
The characteristics of patients we found to most frequently have high SFK phosphorylation in the tissue microarray (squamous cell, male, active smoker) differed from those of patients with EGFR-dependent NSCLC (adenocarcinoma, female, non- or former smoker). Although its frequency of detection varied among the different subgroups, SFK phosphorylation was detected in all three histological subtypes examined (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and bronchioloalveolar cell), in both genders, and in all smoking categories. Further, based on our findings in EGFR-dependent NSCLC cell lines, this subgroup of adenocarcinomas had high SFK phosphorylation and depended on SFKs for survival. We conclude that the role of SFKs should be investigated in all NSCLCs that have high SFK phosphorylation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the National Institutes of Health (Lung Cancer SPORE grant P50 CA70907).
J.Z. and S.K. contributed equally to this work.
M.W. is a postdoctoral fellow of La Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale and La Formation Continue du Corps Medical des Hopitaux de Paris.
Accepted for publication October 10, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. VanMeter, A. S. Rodriguez, E. D. Bowman, J. Jen, C. C. Harris, J. Deng, V. S. Calvert, A. Silvestri, C. Fredolini, V. Chandhoke, et al. Laser Capture Microdissection and Protein Microarray Analysis of Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Differential Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGPR) Phosphorylation Events Associated with Mutated EGFR Compared with Wild Type Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1902 - 1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, K. Iwanaga, K. C. Choi, M. Wislez, M. G. Raso, W. Wei, I. I. Wistuba, and J. M. Kurie Intratumoral Epiregulin Is a Marker of Advanced Disease in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients and Confers Invasive Properties on EGFR-Mutant Cells Cancer Prevention Research, August 1, 2008; 1(3): 201 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Giaccone and P. A. Zucali Src as a potential therapeutic target in non-small-cell lung cancer Ann. Onc., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1219 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |