| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


From the Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de lUniversité de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame,* Montreal; and Hôpital Saint-Luc,
Montreal, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, but not interleukin-6, is sufficient to cause Rgmc down-regulation by LPS. These results contrast with previous data demonstrating that hepcidin levels are directly regulated by interleukin-6 but not by tumor necrosis factor-
. The regulation of iron-related genes by different cytokines may allow for time-dependent control of iron metabolism changes during inflammation and may be relevant to chronic inflammation, infections, and cancer settings, leading to the development of anemia of chronic disease.
Recently, several genes have been identified that, when mutated, can elicit HH. HH type 1, the most common form, is a late-onset autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in HFE, which codes for a ubiquitously expressed3,4 major histocompatibility complex class I-like molecule.5 HFE requires ß2-microglobulin (ß2m) for appropriate cell surface expression,6 and in fact both Hfe/ and ß2m/ mice recapitulate human HH and develop iron overload in the liver because of iron hyperabsorption in the duodenum.7-9 HFE influences iron homeostasis through its binding to transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), which is part of the major cellular iron uptake pathway, and by reducing the affinity of TfR1 for transferrin (Tf), thus competing with Tf binding.10,11
Juvenile hemochromatosis (JH) or type 2 hemochromatosis, a rare autosomal disease, shares several features with HFE hemochromatosis. However, because the rate of iron accumulation is much faster than in the classical form, all of the clinical manifestations develop earlier, typically in the first or second decade of life. In JH, the most prominent clinical features are heart failure and endocrine manifestations.12 JH has been shown to have two causative factors: loss of function mutations in hepcidin (HAMP)13 or hemojuvelin (HJV)14 genes.
Hepcidin is a hormone discovered independently by three groups as a mouse peptide expressed in response to iron levels and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)15 and as a human antimicrobial peptide of the ß-defensin family found in urine16 and blood.17 In all these reports, hepcidin was found to be highly expressed in the liver. Furthermore, mice deficient in hepcidin are iron-overloaded18 whereas, conversely, transgenic mice overexpressing hepcidin are severely anemic,19 suggesting that hepcidin is a negative regulator of iron absorption. Hepcidin expression in the liver is regulated by iron levels and inflammation,20 and its mechanism of action includes posttranslational regulation of the cellular iron exporter ferroportin 1 (Fp1) in intestinal epithelial cells and macrophages.21
Comparatively, much less is known about HJV. HJV encodes for a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein that has a partial von Willebrand factor type D domain and an Arg-Gly-Asp motif, usual in the structure of integrins. HJV is uniformly expressed in skeletal muscle and is present selectively in periportal hepatocytes.22 HJV shares high similarity with repulsive guidance molecules (RGMs), which are involved in axonal guidance.23 In the mouse, the Rgm family comprises three members, Rgma, Rgmb, and Rgmc, the mouse ortholog of HJV. In fact, Rgmc-deficient mice, like hepcidin-deficient mice, develop severe hemochromatosis, with deposition of excess iron, mostly in parenchymal cells of the liver, heart, and pancreas.22,24
A common feature in both HFE-linked HH and JH caused by HJV mutations is lower than expected hepcidin basal levels.14,25 Although it is now clear that Rgmc participates in the maintenance of iron homeostasis, it is not yet fully understood how the gene is regulated, through which signaling pathways, and whether there is any relationship between Rgmc and HFE for the control of hepcidin basal levels.
In this study, to gain new insights into the regulation of Rgmc, we used mouse models of HH (Hfe/ and ß2m/) and toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4)-deficient mice to investigate adaptive changes of Rgmc levels. In addition, the role of individual cytokines, namely, interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
, in the regulation of Rgmc was examined both in vivo and in vitro.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All procedures were performed in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines after approval by the institutional Animal Care Committee of the Centre Hospitalier de lUniversité de Montréal. Hfe/ mice were kindly provided by Dr. Nancy C. Andrews, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Harvard Medical School, Childrens Hospital, Boston, MA, in the 129/SvEvTac background9 and were backcrossed onto the C57BL/6 (B6) background for 10 generations (N10). C57BL/6 controls, ß2m/ (C57BL/6 background, N11), B6.129S6-Il6tm1Kopf (IL-6-deficient; C57BL/6 background, N11), and the C3H substrains, C3H/HeOuJ (wild type or WT) and C3H/HeJ (Tlr4-deficient), were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). All animals were housed in a light- and temperature-controlled environment with free access to tap water and food.
Animal Treatments
Control mice were fed a commercial diet (Teklad Global 18% protein rodent diet; Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI). Dietary iron overload was produced by giving 8-week-old mice the same commercial diet supplemented with 2.5% (w/w) carbonyl iron (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 2 weeks. Iron deprivation was induced by feeding the mice the same commercial diet deficient in iron for 2 weeks.
Ten-week-old mice were injected with saline (LPS; Escherichia coli serotype 055:B5, 5 mg/kg26,27
or 25 mg/kg28
i.p.; Sigma-Aldrich), recombinant mouse IL-6 (1 µg i.p.29,30
; Cederlane Laboratories Ltd., Hornby, ON, Canada) or recombinant mouse TNF-
(1 µg i.p.;30
Cederlane). Control mice were similarly injected with an equivalent volume of sterile saline solution. Livers were excised 6, 17, 24, and 48 hours after LPS administration and 3 and 6 hours after IL-6 or TNF-
injections.
Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)
Tissue samples were stored in RNALater (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada), and total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada). RT was performed with the Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen), using random hexamers and RNase inhibitor (Invitrogen). mRNA levels of Rgmc, ß-actin, and hepcidin were measured by real-time PCR in a Rotor Gene 3000 real-time DNA detection system (Montreal Biotech Inc., Kirkland, QC, Canada) with the QuantiTect SYBR+Green I PCR kit (Qiagen).31 The following primers were used: ß-actin 5'-TGTTACCAACTGGGACGACA-3' and 5'-GGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAA-3'; Rgmc 5'-AATTTCACACATGCCGTGTC-3' and TCAAAGGCTGCAGGAAGATT-3'; hepcidin 5'-AGAGCTGCAGCCTTTGCAC-3' and 5'-GAAGATGCAGATGGGGAAGT-3'. Expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene ß-actin.
Hepatocyte Isolation and Treatments
Hepatocytes were isolated from adult mouse livers according to a procedure already described.32
Isolated cells were resuspended in Williams E media with 5% fetal bovine serum and seeded on collagen-coated plates at a density of 2.4 x 105 cells per well. After 3 hours, unattached cells were removed, and the medium replaced by fresh medium. Twenty-two hours after isolation, the medium was changed and replaced by fresh medium alone or medium containing IL-6 (20 ng/ml), TNF-
(20 ng/ml), or LPS (100 ng/ml) for 24 hours.
Serum Iron (SI) and Transferrin Saturation (TS) Measurements
SI, total iron binding capacity, and TS were assessed by colorimetric assay with the Kodak Ektachem DT60 system (Johnson & Johnson, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Mississauga, ON, Canada).31
Measurements of Tissue Iron Concentration
Liver iron concentrations were assessed by acid digestion of tissue samples, followed by iron quantification with atomic absorption spectroscopy.33
Statistical Analysis
Students t-test (unpaired, two-tailed) was applied for comparison between two groups. Comparisons between more than two groups were performed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparison test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Feeding mice on diets with different iron content resulted in statistically significant differences in body iron levels, as evidenced by measuring liver iron concentrations (Figure 1A)
. Mice fed the low-iron diet had a 2.5-fold reduction in liver iron concentrations compared to mice fed the standard diet, whereas animals kept on the high-iron diet had an approximately twofold increase in hepatic iron stores. Hepatic Rgmc mRNA levels, however, did not differ among mice subjected to the different diets (Figure 1B)
. Thus, changes in body iron levels through diet do not affect Rgmc quantitatively at the mRNA level. In contrast, and as expected,15,34
hepcidin levels were clearly regulated by iron stores, increasing with iron loading and decreasing when the dietary iron level was low (Figure 1C)
.
|
Next, we investigated whether alterations in basal Rgmc levels in Hfe-deficient mice, namely ß2m and Hfe knockout mice, contribute to inappropriate hepcidin levels found in these mice.25,35
As expected,7,9
ß2m/ and Hfe/ mice had approximately threefold more iron in the liver than WT mice (Figure 1D)
. Basal Rgmc and hepcidin mRNA levels in the livers of Hfe-deficient mice were similar to those in WT mice (Figure 1, E and F)
. Because, unlike hepcidin, Rgmc mRNA levels were not regulated by iron stores (Figure 1B)
, this indicates that Rgmc was expressed at appropriate basal levels in the liver of Hfe-deficient mice.
LPS Represses Rgmc Expression in Both the Liver and Heart
To investigate changes in iron parameters and Rgmc expression in response to inflammation, we initially determined the effect of a single LPS administration at various times up to 48 hours. SI and TS were significantly lower for up to 24 hours after LPS challenge, returning to normal or even to higher than normal levels by 48 hours (Figure 2, A and B)
, indicating that mice become hypoferremic, at least during the first 24 hours. Hepatic Rgmc mRNA levels decreased significantly by 6 hours to 9.7% that of the control value and, in contrast to hypoferremia, the reduction persisted for 48 hours, albeit a modest recovery was observed after the lowest point at 6 hours (Figure 2C)
.
|
50% decrease in Rgmc mRNA level in the heart that persisted for 48 hours (Figure 2D)Rgmc Repression by LPS Is Independent of Hfe
Next, to assess whether changes in Rgmc mRNA expression are appropriately elicited in Hfe-deficient mice, we measured Rgmc mRNA expression in Hfe/ and ß2m/ mice after LPS administration. As shown in Figure 3
, Hfe-deficient mice responded, like WT mice, by dramatically down-regulating their hepatic Rgmc expression (Figure 3A)
and up-regulating hepcidin (Figure 3B)
. This demonstrates that the ability to down-regulate Rgmc during the acute phase response remains intact in the absence of functional Hfe.
|
Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP), including LPS, are recognized by TLRs, which, upon activation, lead to the production of proinflammatory cytokines. LPS is a PAMP that is recognized by Tlr4 and the CD14 co-receptor.36
To establish whether hypoferremia and Rgmc down-regulation observed during LPS-induced acute inflammation are dependent on the Tlr4 pathway, we tested two C3H mouse substrains: mice deficient in Tlr4 (C3H/HeJ) and WT (C3H/HeOuJ) mice. We observed higher SI and TS values in saline-treated mice from this mouse strain (C3H) compared to C57BL/6 mice (Figure 2, A and B)
. Strain to strain differences in SI and TS, with C57BL/6 mice having the lowest values, have been observed by others37
; thus, these differences are attributable most likely to strain variations.
Both WT and Tlr4-deficient mice developed hypoferremia 6 hours after LPS treatment, as evidenced by decreases in SI, by 30% in WT and 32% in Tlr4-deficient mice at 5 mg/kg and by 72% in WT and 51% in Tlr4-deficient mice at 25 mg/kg doses of LPS (Figure 4A)
. TS decreased by
40% in both mouse strains at 5 mg/kg and by 71% in WT and 60% in Tlr4-deficient mice at 25 mg/kg doses of LPS (Figure 4B)
. We found that Rgmc repression and hepcidin up-regulation in the liver were suppressed in Tlr4-deficient animals at both 5 mg/kg and 25 mg/kg doses of LPS (Figure 4, C and D)
. In addition, Rgmc down-regulation in the heart was repressed (Figure 4E)
. Thus, the pathways involved in Rgmc and hepcidin regulation during inflammation, but not the hypoferremic response, is Tlr4-dependent.
|
Is Involved in the Suppression of Rgmc Expression by LPS
The Tlr4 signaling pathway leads to activation of nuclear factor (NF)-
B, which initiates the transcription of proinflammatory cytokine genes such as Tnf-
and Il-6. Consequently, in Tlr4-deficient C3H/HeJ mice, LPS induces markedly less production of TNF-
and IL-6 in serum, as well as hepatic mRNA levels (data not shown), than in Tlr4-normal C3H/HeOuJ mice,27,36,38,39
suggesting that cytokines might be mediators of the LPS-induced fall in Rgmc mRNA levels. To determine whether these cytokines are able to decrease Rgmc mRNA and cause hypoferremia in vivo, C57BL/6 mice were treated with 1 µg of recombinant mouse IL-6 or TNF-
for 3 or 6 hours. As shown in Figure 5, A and B
, TNF-
led to hypoferremia, because SI and TS were reduced to similar levels, as observed after LPS administration. Likewise, as reported in humans40
and rats,41
IL-6 caused hypoferremia at earlier time points (90 minutes), with a 29% decrease in SI (P < 0.0001) and a 22% decrease in TS (P < 0.001). TNF-
and IL-6 were both able to suppress Rgmc mRNA, albeit less than LPS treatment. In fact, TNF-
induced a 65% decrease at 3 hours and 48% at 6 hours, whereas IL-6 caused only a 38% decline at 3 hours (Figure 5C)
. In contrast, hepcidin expression was up-regulated twofold by IL-6 at 3 hours but remained unaffected by TNF-
treatment (Figure 5D)
.
|
were able to target Rgmc expression directly on hepatocytes, primary cultured mouse hepatocytes were prepared from perfused livers and treated with the two different cytokines. As illustrated in Figure 5E
decreased Rgmc mRNA to 38% that of control levels, whereas no significant response was observed in IL-6-treated hepatocytes. Differently, and as expected,42
hepcidin levels were up-regulated only by IL-6 (Figure 5F)
, but not IL-6, is sufficient for the repression of Rgmc mRNA levels in hepatocytes. IL-6 Is Not Required for Rgmc Down-Regulation in Response to LPS
To exclude further the possible requirement for IL-6 in Rgmc down-regulation during inflammation, we tested IL-6 knockout mice. As seen in Figure 6, A and B
, IL-6-deficient mice developed hypoferremia, as SI and TS, respectively, decreased to 42 and 45% of control levels. Furthermore, IL-6-deficient mice retained their capacity to mount a robust response to LPS by down-regulating Rgmc expression by 87% (Figure 6C)
. In contrast, and as reported previously,43
IL-6-deficient mice presented an impaired hepcidin response, as observed in Figure 6D
. Thus, although IL-6 is necessary for hepcidin regulation, it is not needed for the modulation of Rgmc expression during inflammation induced by LPS.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the fact that Rgmc mRNA levels are not regulated by iron, recent evidence emerging from Rgmc knockout mouse studies indicate that Rgmc plays an essential role in the iron-sensing pathway at the systemic level, through the control of basal hepcidin levels. In fact, Rgmc knockout mice have low basal hepcidin levels and develop severe iron overload in the liver, heart, and pancreas, as do JH patients.22,24 Eventually, the lack of Rgmc regulation by iron at the mRNA level does not exclude the possibility of posttranscriptional regulation, either at the cell membrane, intracellular compartments, or even as a secreted factor.47
Besides iron levels, iron homeostasis is also altered during inflammation, which is characterized by the occurrence of hypoferremia and the regulation of expression levels of iron metabolism-related genes, including Rgmc.44 The response to LPS seems to be tissue-specific because Rgmc down-regulation is not seen in the skeletal muscle of mice treated with LPS but is evident in the liver.22 We further show that down-regulation of Rgmc expression also occurs in the heart, where hepcidin is as well expressed,31 and persists for up to 48 hours in both the liver and heart. This indicates that Rgmc is important not only in the control of iron metabolism at the systemic level, as it impacts intestinal iron absorption through the regulation of hepcidin levels,22 but also locally, in the heart. This could be pertinent because cardiomyopathy is considerably more frequent in JH than in HH.46
We also explored the possible connection between Hfe and Rgmc because HH patients and Hfe-deficient mice,25,35,48,49
like Rgmc knockout mice,22,24
have lower than expected basal hepcidin levels. We investigated whether Hfe-deficient mice express appropriate basal Rgmc levels and are able to respond to LPS challenge. Our finding that both Hfe-deficient strains tested show basal Rgmc levels similar to WT mice, coupled with the observation that they retain the ability to down-regulate Rgmc after LPS administration, excludes any involvement of Hfe in Rgmc regulation and participation in the pathogenesis of classical HH. Thus, Hfe and Rgmc control of basal hepcidin expression occurs through two independent pathways. Further support for the existence of these pathways in the regulation of basal hepcidin mRNA levels comes from the findings that Rgmc knockout mice are unable to respond to an increase in iron stores by up-regulating their hepcidin expression22
; in contrast, Hfe/ mice seem to retain this capacity.35,50
Thus, it appears unlikely that Hfe lies downstream of the Rgmc-dependent pathway for hepcidin regulation by iron, but Hfe may instead regulate basal hepcidin levels through another pathway, as summarized by the model in Figure 7
.
|
Activation of the Tlr4-dependent signaling pathway ultimately results in the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and TNF-
, which are known to directly influence iron metabolism and provoke hypoferremia. The mechanism by which IL-6 is believed to induce hypoferremia is related to its ability to stimulate hepcidin expression,40
a finding confirmed in this study (Figure 5D)
, which in turn causes iron sequestration in macrophages and reduces intestinal iron absorption51
by binding to Fp1 and inducing its internalization.21
However, there is ample evidence that TNF-
administration is also sufficient to cause hypoferremia52
by increasing iron sequestration within macrophages.53
A potential mechanism for TNF-
-induced iron sequestration in both the liver and spleen54
can be linked to the ability of TNF-
to directly down-regulate Fp1 in a variety of cells, including macrophages,55
hepatocytes,35
and endothelial cells.56
Thus, TNF-
can cause hypoferremia by a mechanism independent of hepcidin induction.54
We found that in vivo both TNF-
and IL-6 treatments led to down-regulation of Rgmc expression. However, when tested in primary hepatocyte cultures, only TNF-
was able to reduce Rgmc expression. Proinflammatory cytokines are known to induce each others expression,57
which may explain why, in vivo, IL-6 treatment had a modest repressive effect on Rgmc expression. In addition, we further excluded IL-6 requirement for Rgmc regulation by demonstrating that IL-6-deficient mice retain the ability to repress Rgmc expression after LPS administration. Taken together, these results indicate that TNF-
, but not IL-6, is sufficient to induce Rgmc down-regulation in hepatocytes. The data contrast with those reported for hepcidin, in which IL-6, but not TNF-
, was shown to up-regulate hepcidin expression in primary hepatocytes,40,43
a finding that we reproduced in our study.
Regulation of the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism by different cytokines may allow for finer and possibly time-dependent control of iron metabolism changes during the response to inflammation. In fact, the signaling cascade triggered by LPS leads to time-dependent and concerted release of proinflammatory cytokines, which is initiated by transduction of the LPS signal across the cell membrane by Tlr4. This is followed by TNF-
production, which, as we demonstrate here, can directly elicit Rgmc down-regulation. The initial surge in TNF-
production is a prerequisite to the subsequent production of other mediators, including IL-1ß58
and IL-6.57,59
These two cytokines, in turn, directly modulate the expression of hepcidin in hepatocytes.40,43,60
Consistent with our previous findings that the inflammatory pathway overrides the iron-sensing pathway for hepcidin regulation,35
Rgmc suppression during inflammation seems to be a prerequisite for the transcriptional regulation of hepcidin by cytokines (Figure 7)
. These results provide further support for the mechanistic view proposed by others that the iron-sensing pathway is switched off during inflammation, which has emerged from their observation that, in Rgmc-deficient mice, the cytokine-dependent pathway for hepcidin regulation remains functional while the iron-sensing pathway is inoperative.22
In conclusion, we report that in vivo Rgmc mRNA levels are not regulated by hepatocyte iron stores and that their control during the inflammatory response is Hfe-independent. Furthermore, LPS-induced signaling involves the Tlr4 pathway and consequent production of TNF-
and IL-6, which are sufficient for Rgmc and hepcidin regulation, respectively. These findings provide important insights into the regulatory pathways impacting iron metabolism changes during inflammation that may also be relevant to other disease settings affecting iron metabolism.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. MOP44045) and the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (grant no. 23539-2758).
M.M.S. is the recipient of a Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Award.
Accepted for publication October 25, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Theurl, E. Aigner, M. Theurl, M. Nairz, M. Seifert, A. Schroll, T. Sonnweber, L. Eberwein, D. R. Witcher, A. T. Murphy, et al. Regulation of iron homeostasis in anemia of chronic disease and iron deficiency anemia: diagnostic and therapeutic implications Blood, May 21, 2009; 113(21): 5277 - 5286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Aigner, I. Theurl, M. Theurl, D. Lederer, H. Haufe, O. Dietze, M. Strasser, C. Datz, and G. Weiss Pathways underlying iron accumulation in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1374 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |