help button home button Am J Pathol International Conference on Pathology of Chest Diseases
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slupsky, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zuzel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slupsky, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zuzel, M.
(American Journal of Pathology. 2007;170:745-754.)
© 2007 American Society for Investigative Pathology
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060557

Central Role of Protein Kinase C{epsilon} in Constitutive Activation of ERK1/2 and Rac1 in the Malignant Cells of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Joseph R. Slupsky, Aura S. Kamiguti, Robert J. Harris, John C. Cawley and Mirko Zuzel

From the Department of Haematology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have previously identified the presence of Ras/Raf-independent constitutive activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in the hairy cells (HCs) of hairy cell leukemia. The aim of the present study was to characterize the signaling components involved in this activation and their relationship to the reported activation of Rac1. We found that both Rac1 and ERK activation in HCs are downstream of active Src and protein kinase C (PKC). Inhibition with toxin B showed that Rac1 plays no role in ERK activation in HCs. However, toxin B inhibited p60src and the Rac1-GEF Vav, demonstrating a positive feedback/activation of p60src by Rac1. Treatment with specific small interfering RNA for various PKC isoforms, or with PKC isoform-specific inhibitors, demonstrated a central role for PKC{epsilon} in the constitutive activation of Rac1 and ERK in HCs. PKC{epsilon} and active ERK were mutually associated and co-localized with mitochondria in HCs. Furthermore, active PKC{epsilon} was nitrated on tyrosine, pointing to a reactive oxygen species-dependent mechanism of activation. By being involved in activation of ERK and Rac1, PKC{epsilon} plays roles in both the survival of HCs and in the cytoskeletal dynamics responsible for the distinctive morphology and tissue homing of these cells. Our study therefore describes novel aspects of signaling important for the pathogenesis of hairy cell leukemia.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is unique among chronic B-cell leukemias in that the malignant cells show particularly pronounced features of activation.1 For example, the cortical cytoskeleton of the malignant hairy cells (HCs) is clearly in a state of active reorganization as indicated by the distinctive membrane ruffling and microvilli formation that gave the malignant cells their name.2 This cytoskeletal activity has been shown to involve phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent, Src-dependent activation of the Rho GTPase Rac1.3

Recently, we have reported that HCs are characterized by the presence of constitutively active extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and that this activation does not depend on Ras->Raf interaction but rather on MEK1/2 activation by a still unclear route.4 We also showed that neither p38 MAP kinase nor c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase are constitutively active in HCs. As regards the mode of ERK activation in HCs, we demonstrated that Src and a protein kinase C (PKC) are involved in this process, since inhibitors of these kinases abolished the constitutive ERK phosphorylation. However, how the various signals identified in HCs are related to each other, how they are initiated, and how they are related to the activation of Rho GTPases remains unclear. The aims of the present study were to explore further the signals involved in the activation of both ERK and Rho GTPases, define their mutual relationships, and establish how different signals contribute to maintenance of the activated phenotype of HCs.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials

Ro32-0432, safingol, Gö6976, PKC{alpha} peptide, SU6656, and Clostridium difficile toxin B were from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (Nottingham, UK). PP1 (4-amino-5-[4-methylphenyl]-7-[t-butyl]pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine) was from Alexis Corporation (Nottingham, UK). Cytochalasin D, polyHEMA (poly[2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate]), myelin basic protein, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), leupeptin, cell culture grade bovine serum albumin, N-acetylcysteine, and ATP were from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK). Aprotinin was from Bayer (Newbury, UK). Tissue culture media and Lymphoprep were from Gibco (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). Protein G-Sepharose was from Zymed (Invitrogen). Reagents for protein determination were from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hemel Hempstead, UK). Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) (Immobilon-P) membrane from Millipore (Hatters Lane, UK), glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads, enhanced chemiluminescence reagent, [{gamma}-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol), and Hyperfilm from GE Health Care UK Ltd. (Chalfont St. Giles, UK) were also used. All other reagents used were of analytical grade. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) for PKC{epsilon}, PKC{delta}, and nonspecific siRNA were purchased from either Dharmacon RNA Technologies (Perbio Science UK Ltd., Cramlington, UK) or from Qiagen (Crawley, UK).

Antibodies

Mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Cdc42, p95Vav, phospho-ERK1/2, and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against Lyn, PKC{epsilon}, PKC{delta}, MEK1/2, ERK1/2, and p60src were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Insight Biotechnology Ltd., Wembley, UK). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against phospho-p60src, phospho-MEK, and phospho-Vav were from New England Biolabs (Hitchin, UK). mAb 327 against p60src was a gift from Dr. S. Feller (Cancer Research UK, Oxford, UK). mAbs against PKC isoforms were from Transduction Laboratories (Cowley, UK) and from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-ß-actin mAb was from Sigma-Aldrich. Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine (PY20 mAb), anti-nitrotyrosine, and anti-Rac1 antibodies were from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY).

Patients, Cell Isolation, and Culture

Blood was obtained with informed consent and with the approval of the Liverpool Research Ethics Committee. All patients had typical HCL as determined by clinical presentation, morphology, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining, and immunophenotype.5 B cells were isolated from peripheral blood and cultured as described previously.4 When inhibitors were used, control cells contained the equivalent amounts of cell culture grade dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich), the solvent used to dissolve all inhibitors, except toxin B, which was made up in distilled water. All inhibitors were used at the concentrations used in the reports referenced.

Cell Staining

Cell cytospins were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich) and analyzed by light microscopy.

Cell Lysates and Western Blotting

Preparation of cell lysates, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and Western blotting were carried out as described previously.4 Intensity of the bands was analyzed by densitometry.

Rac1 and Cdc42 Pulldown Assay

Pulldowns of GTP-Rac1 and -Cdc42 from HC lysates were performed as described6,7 using a fusion protein consisting of glutathione S-transferase coupled to the Cdc42-/Rac1-binding domain (amino acids 59 to 272) of p21-activated protein kinase. Proteins bound to this fusion protein were isolated by affinity chromatography on glutathione-Sepharose 4B and analyzed by Western blotting.

Immunoprecipitation

Proteins were immunoprecipitated from HCs lysed with either radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer [1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 25 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 25 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mmol/L sodium glycerophosphate, 50 mmol/L NaF, 2 mmol/L ethylene glycol bis(ß-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA), 2 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 10% glycerol, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mmol/L PMSF] or NP-40 lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mmol/L PMSF) using antibodies that had been preadsorbed to protein G-Sepharose. The immunoprecipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer before analysis by Western blot or for further use in in vitro kinase assays.

In Vitro Kinase Assays

For immunoprecipitated PKC{epsilon}, the protein G-Sepharose beads were transferred into kinase buffer (25 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 25 mmol/L sodium glycerophosphate, 20 mmol/L MgCl2, and 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol). The kinase reaction was initiated with the addition of kinase buffer containing 10 µCi of [{gamma}-32P]ATP and 1 µg of myelin basic protein as exogenous substrate. The kinase reaction was incubated for 30 minutes at 30°C and terminated with the addition of SDS-PAGE buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes for analysis by Western blot and autoradiography.

Confocal Microscopy

HCs were prepared for confocal microscopy by centrifugation onto glass slides. The HCs were then fixed with methanol. In some experiments, MitoTracker Red was used to stain mitochondria using the procedure provided by the manufacturer (Cambrex Bio Science Wokingham, Ltd., Wokingham, UK). Primary anti-PKC{epsilon} and -ERK antibodies were used at 1:10 dilution. Alexa-Fluor-488 and -555 second-layer antibodies (Invitrogen) were used at 1:50 dilution.

siRNA Knockdown of PKC{epsilon} and {delta} in CLL Cells

Cell transfection with siRNA reagents was mediated with HiPerFect reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HCs (2 x 106) were subjected to three "hits" of siRNA specific for PKC{delta}, PKC{epsilon}, or with nonspecific control siRNA (100 pmol) using 48-hour incubation time between each cycle of siRNA addition. Throughout this procedure HC viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion, and in no case did cell viability drop below 90%. HCs were harvested at the end of the third cycle and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.

Subcellular Fractionation of HCs

HCs were suspended in lysis buffer B (250 mmol/L sucrose, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 5 mmol/L EGTA, 10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.4, plus 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin) on ice and then lysed by passing the cells 15 times through a 25-gauge needle. The lysed cells were initially centrifuged at 750 x g for 10 minutes to sediment nuclei and other cellular debris. The supernatant was taken and centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 30 minutes to sediment the heavy membrane fraction. The supernatant was further centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1.5 hours to separate the light membranes (pellet) from the cytosol (supernatant). Protein concentrations of each fraction were determined, and equal amounts of protein from each fraction were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
PKC Regulates Constitutive p60src Activity in HCs

Src is constitutively active in HCs as revealed by phosphorylation at Tyr-416 demonstrated in both whole-cell lysates (Figure 1A) and in immunoprecipitates with p60src-specific mAb 327, an antibody that recognizes the active form of this enzyme8 (not shown). Because PKC activation induces disassembly of actin stress fibers and appearance of membrane ruffles via a Src-dependent pathway in other cells,9 it seemed important to examine whether PKC plays any role in Src activation in HCs. Thus, we treated HCs with Ro32-0432 and safingol, two general PKC inhibitors acting by different mechanisms, and showed that both inhibitors abrogated activation-dependent Src phosphorylation (Figure 1A) . Ro32-0432 and safingol also abolished ERK activation,4 indicating a major role of PKC in the regulation of both Src and ERK activities.


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. PKC regulates p60src activity in HCs; active p60src and PKC are required for tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav. Cells (107/ml) were incubated for 60 minutes with dimethylsulfoxide (control) or with 10 µmol/L Ro32-0432, safingol, PP1, or SU6656. A shows p60src in lysates of 106 cells Western blotted for activation-dependent Tyr-416 phosphorylation (top panel). The center and bottom panels show levels of p60src protein and ß-actin as loading controls. In B, p60src was inhibited by treatment of HCs with PP1 or SU6656 and in C, by safingol or Ro32-0432. Then proteins in cell lysates (106 cells) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-phospho-Vav antibody (Tyr-174). Total Vav and ß-actin were used as loading controls.

 
In HCs, Src and PKC Maintain Persistent Activation of Rac1

Because the Src substrate Vav is one of the guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rac,10 we examined whether Vav and Rac are included among signals downstream of PKC and Src. Figure 1B shows that Vav in HCs is constitutively phosphorylated at Tyr-174, the site crucial for Rac activation by Vav,11 and that this phosphorylation was abolished in cells treated with the Src family kinase inhibitors PP1 and SU6656 (Figure 1B) , as well as with PKC inhibitors either Ro32-0432 or safingol (Figure 1C) . HC treatment with Gö6976, an inhibitor specific for classical PKCs, had no effect on either in vitro PKC kinase activity or Vav phosphorylation (not shown). Therefore, either a novel or an atypical PKC upstream of p60src regulates the activation of Vav in HCs.

We then confirmed that both Rac1 and Cdc42 are activated in HCs.3 This activation did not change in cells cultured for 24 hours on a nonadherent surface in the absence of serum (Figure 2A) , indicating that it is truly constitutive. Furthermore, both PP1 and Ro32-0432 abolished GTP loading of Rac1 (Figure 2, B and C) , confirming that Src and PKC are indeed responsible for the activation of Rac1 in HCs.3 As expected, the Rho family GTPase inhibitor toxin B abolished the constitutive activation of Rac1 (Figure 2D) .


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Rac1 and Cdc42 are constitutively active and control the morphological appearance of HCs. A–D: HCs (107 cells/ml) were cultured on polyHEMA-coated plates in the absence of serum and lysed at the indicated times. A: Proteins isolated by Rac1-pulldown were immunoblotted with anti-Rac1 or anti-Cdc42 antibodies and compared with the total Rac1 or Cdc42 contained in cell lysates. B: Rac1 pulldown of HCs treated with 10 µmol/L PP1 for 1 hour. C: Rac1 pulldown of HCs treated with 10 µmol/L Ro32-0432 for 1 hour. D: Rac1 pulldown of HCs treated with 20 ng/ml toxin B for 3 hours. In B–D, similar results were obtained using cells of another HCL case. E: Cytospins of control HCs or HCs treated for 3 hours with 20 ng/ml toxin B or for 1 hour with 10 µmol/L Ro32-0432 or with 10 µmol/L PP1. HCs were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa and examined with light microscopy.

 
The importance of PKC, Src, and Rac in maintaining HC phenotype was examined next. Figure 2E shows that membrane ruffles and microvilli were lost and cells became more rounded with a higher nuclear cytoplasmic ratio when HCs were treated with Ro32-0432, PP1, or toxin B.

Src activation is accompanied by its translocation from the cytosol to the cell periphery, a process known to be actin dependent12 and potentially important for Src association with particular substrates. We therefore examined the importance of cytoskeletal integrity for Src-induced activation of Vav and Rac1. The incubation of HCs with the F-actin-disrupting agent cytochalasin D for up to 24 hours reduced the phosphorylation of Src and Vav but had a less pronounced effect on MEK or ERK phosphorylation (Figure 3A , left panels).


Figure 3
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. The role of cytoskeleton in constitutive signaling in HCs. A: HCs were treated with 10 µmol/L cytochalasin D (left panels) or 20 ng/ml toxin B (right panels) for 1, 3, and 24 hours. These treatments did not affect HC viability. Phosphorylated Src, Vav, MEK1/2, and ERK1/2 were detected in cell lysates (106 cells) using antibodies against activated Src (Tyr-416), Vav (Tyr-174), MEK (Ser-217/221), and ERK (Tyr-204). Similar results were obtained with cells from two other HCL cases. B: Lyn was immunoprecipitated from HC lysates and the immunoprecipitated protein was Western blotted for phosphotyrosine and Lyn.

 
Collectively, these results indicate that Vav/Rac1 regulation depends on an active Src kinase and that cytoskeletal integrity is required for this regulation. We next used toxin B to inhibit Rac1 to establish whether the Rac->PAK->MEK->ERK pathway described in other cells13,14 is operative in HCs.

Inhibition of Rac1 Does Not Affect the MEK->ERK Pathway in HCs

The inhibition of Rac1 by toxin B had no effect on MEK or ERK phosphorylation (Figure 3A , right panels) despite pronounced inhibition of the phosphorylation of p60src and Vav. This shows that ERK activation in HCs does not involve the Rac->PAK->MEK pathway and depends on a PP1-sensitive Src family kinase4 other than p60src, most likely p56lyn (Figure 3B) . Because we have already established that PKC is involved in the activation of ERK in HCs (this study and Ref. 4 ), we next used specific inhibitors to define which isoform(s) are involved and the pathway by which ERK is activated downstream of PKC.

PKC{epsilon} Is Involved in the Constitutive Activation of ERK in HCs

Neither chelation of intracellular Ca2+ (not shown) nor inhibition of classical PKCs by treating HCs with Gö6976 or PKC{alpha} inhibitor peptide (Figure 4A) affected constitutive activity of ERK. This indicates that classical PKC isoforms ({alpha} and ß), despite being activated,4,15 are not involved in the constitutive activation of ERK in HCs.


Figure 4
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 4. The constitutive activation of ERK in HCs involves PKC{epsilon}. A: Cell lysates were analyzed for the presence of phosphorylated ERK in HCs treated with 10 µmol/L PKC{alpha}-blocking peptide or with 100 nmol/L Gö6976 for 1 hour. This figure shows the results of one of three independent experiments using the PKC{alpha}-blocking peptide and two of five independent experiments using Gö6976. B: Lysates from HCs treated with control siRNA or with siRNA specific for PKC{epsilon} and PKC{delta} were analyzed for the presence of phosphorylated Src, Vav, and ERK. Data in this figure represent one of three independent experiments with similar results. C: Immune complex kinase assay of PKC{epsilon} immunoprecipitated from HC lysates performed in the presence or absence of Ro32-0432. D: A summary of the results presented in C, representing the data generated using three different HC cases. Statistical analysis was performed using a Student’s t-test.

 
Among the novel PKC isoforms, PKC{delta} and {epsilon} have been implicated in ERK activation in other cell types.16-20 We used siRNAs to knock down the expression of these two isoforms. Figure 4B shows that the treatment of HCs with siRNAs against PKC{delta} and {epsilon} reduced their respective protein levels by around 80%. Knockdown of PKC{epsilon} reduced phosphorylation of ERK, Vav, and Src (Figure 4B) , whereas knockdown of PKC{delta} had no effect on the phosphorylation of these proteins.

In our initial studies (not shown), ERK activation was also inhibited by rottlerin, an agent often used as a specific PKC{delta} inhibitor. However, the mechanism of inhibition was found to be an indirect consequence of the uncoupling of mitochondrial respiration from oxidative phosphorylation.21 This, together with the absence of an effect of PKC{delta} knockdown on ERK phosphorylation, makes it highly unlikely that PKC{delta} is involved in constitutive ERK activation in HCs.

We next confirmed that PKC{epsilon} is active in HCs. Figure 4, C and D , shows that significant kinase activity is immunoprecipitated from lysates of HCs using anti-PKC{epsilon} antibodies. Furthermore, Figure 4, C and D , also shows that Ro32-0432 almost completely inhibited this immunoprecipitated PKC{epsilon} activity. Similar results were observed in experiments using a second mAb that targeted a different epitope of PKC{epsilon} (data not shown). Furthermore, Western blot analysis of HC cytosolic, heavy membrane, and light membrane subcellular fractions show that PKC{epsilon} is primarily localized in heavy membrane fractions and not in HC cytosol (Figure 5A) . Because membrane translocation is a paradigm of PKC activation,22,23 this further supports our observation that PKC{epsilon} is active in HCs. Taken together, the above data demonstrate a role for active PKC{epsilon} in the constitutive activation of ERK in HCs.


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 5. PKC{epsilon} co-localizes with ERK and p60src. A: HCs were fractionated into cytosolic, light membrane, heavy membrane (containing the mitochondria), and nuclear cell compartments by differential centrifugation. Equal protein amounts (10 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE, and Western blots were probed with the indicated antibodies. Data in this figure represent one of three independent experiments with similar results. B: Confocal microscopy showing co-localization of PKC{epsilon} and ERK and their association with mitochondria in HCs. Insets are magnifications of representative cells in the merged images. These images are representative of the malignant cells from two cases of HCL. C: Lysates of cells from two cases of HCL were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies or with protein G-Sepharose and analyzed by Western blot for the presence of PKC{epsilon} and ERK. The immune complexes in lane HCL 1* were washed with RIPA buffer before gel loading to disrupt the molecular association between PKC{epsilon} and ERK. D: PKC{epsilon} was isolated from cell lysates from two HC cases by immunoprecipitation and analyzed by Western blot for PKC{epsilon} and p60src. C and D are representative of at least two experiments using cells from different HCL cases.

 
PKC{epsilon} Co-Associates with and Activates ERK at the Mitochondrial Membrane

In other cell types, the cytoprotective effect of PKC{epsilon} is mediated by its co-localization at the mitochondrial membrane with elements of the MAP kinase cascade.24,25 We investigated PKC{epsilon} localization in HCs by subcellular fractionation. Figure 5A shows that PKC{epsilon} was concentrated in the heavy membrane fraction, known to contain mitochondria. Moreover, ERK in the heavy membrane fraction was phosphorylated, although nonphosphorylated ERK was present in all fractions (Figure 5A) . Inhibition of PKC{epsilon} with Ro32-0432 abolished ERK phosphorylation in the heavy membrane fraction without affecting its localization there. These results strongly suggest that PKC{epsilon} specifically co-associates with and activates ERK at the mitochondrial membrane. Indeed, confocal microscopy of HCs shows that PKC{epsilon} and ERK are co-localized and are both associated with mitochondria (Figure 5B) . Furthermore, ERK was detected in the immunoprecipitates of PKC{epsilon} from HC lysates, and PKC{epsilon} was detected in the immunoprecipitates of ERK from HC lysates (Figure 5C) .

PKC{epsilon} Is Nitrated on Tyrosine

PKC{epsilon} belongs to the novel family of PKC proteins and as such is activated by the presence of diacylglycerol.23 However, other factors such as NO-induced nitration of tyrosine are also known to activate this PKC.26,27 Protein nitration in cells is caused by high levels of NO and reactive oxygen species (ROS).28 Peroxynitrite (ONOO–) is a well-characterized nitrating species formed when NO reacts with superoxide anion,26 known to be produced during electron transport in the mitochondrial respiratory chain and, in HCs, also by the plasma membrane-associated NADPH oxidase NOX5.7 Because HCs express high levels of catalytically active inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS),29 and because they also contain high amounts of NADPH oxidase-generated ROS,7 we investigated PKC{epsilon} nitration in HCs. Experiments sequentially using specific antibodies against nitro-tyrosine for immunoprecipitation and against PKC{epsilon} for Western blotting clearly showed that PKC{epsilon} in HCs is nitrated on tyrosine (Figure 6) . Furthermore, when HCs were treated with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to reduce intracellular ROS, we found that the amount of PKC{epsilon} that could be immunoprecipitated with anti-nitrotyrosine mAbs was clearly reduced (Figure 6B) . These results suggest that PKC{epsilon} is activated through a combination of NO generation and ROS production.


Figure 6
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 6. PKC{epsilon} is nitrated on tyrosine in HCs. HC lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies, and Western blots were probed with anti-PKC{epsilon} antibodies. A: Western blots of immunoprecipitated proteins from lysates of malignant cells from five cases of HCL. A whole-cell lysate was also run together with the immunoprecipitates to show equal position of anti-PKC{epsilon}-reactive bands in both samples. B: Western blots of immunoprecipitated proteins from lysates of HCs incubated overnight in the presence or absence of 25 mmol/L NAC. Cell viability was similar in treated and untreated cells.

 
We next investigated the role of ROS in PKC{epsilon} activation. Figure 7A shows that PKC{epsilon} activity was inhibited when HCs were treated with NAC. Moreover, signals downstream of PKC{epsilon}, including phosphorylation of Src, Vav, and ERK, and GTP loading of Rac1, were also inhibited (Figure 7, B and C) . Taken together, these results demonstrate that ROS are involved in PKC{epsilon} activation in HCs. Our findings, summarized in Figure 8 , suggest a model where PKC{epsilon} plays a central role downstream of ROS in the two partially independent signaling pathways responsible for the constitutive activation of HCs.


Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 7. NAC treatment inhibits PKC{epsilon} and PKC{epsilon}-dependent downstream signals in HCs. HCs from two HCL cases were incubated in the presence or absence of 25 mmol/L NAC for 1 hour. A: PKC{epsilon} immunoprecipitated from these lysates was subjected to in vitro kinase assay. B: Whole-cell lysates of these HCs were also analyzed by Western blot for the presence of phosphorylated Src, Vav, and ERK. C: Rac1 pulldown from HC lysates from these two cases. The isolated proteins were immunoblotted with anti-Rac1 antibodies and compared with the total Rac1 in the whole-cell lysates. The figure shows that NAC inhibited PKC{epsilon} activity as well as those of Src, Vav, ERK, and Rac1.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 8. Proposed pathways of constitutive signaling in hairy cells. This figure shows the schematic representation of the possible associations into two parallel pathways of active signaling components detected in HCs. PKC{epsilon} plays a central role, controlling the activation of p60src, Rac1, and ERK. PKC{epsilon} is itself activated through nitration of tyrosine residues by the presence of ROS and NO. ROS contribute to constitutive HC activation through potentiation of protein tyrosine kinase signaling by inhibiting the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Here, we describe the signaling components involved in the previously reported PKC- and Src-dependent constitutive activation of ERK and Rac1 in HCs.3,4 We demonstrate that this constitutive activation of ERK and Rac1 involves two partially independent pathways that are stimulated by active PKC{epsilon}.

ERK activation in malignant cells has been described previously and can originate from different sources. In acute myeloid leukemia,30 this was attributed to a combination of ERK overexpression and down-regulation of a dual-specificity phosphatase, PAC1.31 ERK overexpression was also observed in human breast cancer,32 whereas in melanoma, activation of ERK was attributed to Raf mutations and excessive cell stimulation by autocrine growth factors.33 Site-directed mutagenesis34 suggests that ERK mutation is another possible cause of its constitutive activation.

We have previously demonstrated constitutive activation of ERK in HCs4 that could not be attributed to any of the above mechanisms. Thus, ERK was not overexpressed, Raf kinase activity was either absent or low, and Raf inhibitors did not affect ERK activation. Blocking autocrine growth factors (basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}) in HCs also did not have an effect (data not shown). Moreover, ERK itself was not mutated because its activity was completely abolished by upstream inhibition of MEK1/2. This effect of MEK inhibitors also excluded ERK activation by previously reported MEK-independent pathways.35

The activation of MEK by PAK, an effector of Rac1 and Cdc42,13,14 is another possible pathway of ERK activation in HCs, because these two GTPases are known to be active in these cells.3 Here, we confirm the presence of GTP-Rac1 in HCs and the involvement of p60src in its activation. Moreover, we show that the likely mechanism of Rac1 activation by p60src involves phosphorylation/activation of Vav. However, Rac1 inhibition with toxin B had no effect on the constitutive activities of either MEK or ERK. Clearly, therefore, the Rac1->PAK->MEK pathway is not responsible for the constitutive activation of ERK in HCs.

To explore further the previously described involvement of PKC in ERK activation,4 we first confirmed that this activation is inhibited in cells treated with the general PKC inhibitors safingol and Ro32-0432. However, Gö6976 (an inhibitor of classical PKCs) had no such effect, suggesting involvement of novel PKC isoforms in the ERK activation. Specific knockdown of PKC{delta} with siRNA had no effect on ERK, Src, or Vav phosphorylation. In contrast, siRNA-mediated knockdown of PKC{epsilon} resulted in a clear reduction in the activities of ERK, Src, and Vav. When we combined PKC{epsilon} and {delta} siRNAs to knock down both proteins, no additional effects were observed, suggesting that PKC{delta} had no role to play in the activation pathways leading to active Rac and ERK. When these experiments were repeated using different PKC{epsilon} and PKC{delta} siRNA constructs, similar results were observed, indicating that the reductions in phosphorylation of ERK, Src, and Vav were due to a reduction in PKC{epsilon} protein and not to off-target effects of the siRNA used. Taken together, these results strongly implicate PKC{epsilon} in the activation of ERK and Rac in HCs.

Both PKC{delta} and PKC{epsilon} can be involved in ERK activation at several levels of the classical MAP kinase cascade,16,17,36-38 including activation through a direct interaction with MEK.20,37 Because we have previously shown that Ras and Raf are not involved in the constitutive ERK activation in HCs,4 we conclude that PKC{epsilon} acts at the level of MEK.

That PKC{epsilon} is also involved in the activation of Rac1 in HCs is suggested by the reduction of phosphorylation of p60src and Vav and a reduction in GTP-Rac1 when cells were treated with siRNA specific for PKC{epsilon} or with Ro32-0432. This finding in HCs is supported by observations in endothelial cells, indicating that association of active PKC{epsilon} with Src in a functional signaling module results in Src activation.39,40 Indeed, we could demonstrate co-immunoprecipitation of PKC{epsilon} and p60src from HC lysates (Figure 5D) . Active Rac1 also has a role to play, because when we inhibited Rac1 with toxin B this also resulted in the reduction of p60src and Vav phosphorylation. We postulated that this dependence of Src and Vav phosphorylation on Rac1 might involve an effect of this GTPase on the cytoskeleton. Rac1 regulates cytoskeletal dynamics,41,42 and p60src is known to bind to certain types of cytoskeletal structures.12 This binding, in turn, could further promote Src activation or protect the kinase from inhibitors. This proposition is supported by our demonstration that actin depolymerization by cytochalasin D led to a pronounced reduction in the phosphorylation of both p60src and Vav.

Our previous work using PP1 demonstrated that not only PKC but also Src kinases are involved in ERK activation. However, in contrast to PP1, toxin B did not affect ERK activation despite strong inhibition of p60src. This suggested the involvement of another PP1-sensitive Src family kinase(s) in the ERK activation pathway. Our preliminary experiments suggest the involvement of Lyn in this pathway, because activation of this kinase was strongly inhibited by PP1 but not toxin B (Figure 3B) .

The central role of PKC{epsilon} in the signaling pathways leading to ERK and Rac left us with the question of what activates this PKC isozyme. We show in immune complex kinase assays that PKC{epsilon} is indeed active in HCs. As a novel PKC isoform, PKC{epsilon} can be activated by diacylglycerol23 ; however, other factors are known to influence its activity.26,43 In the present study, we could not demonstrate a constitutively active phospholipase C required for diacylglycerol generation (not shown); therefore, we focused on tyrosine nitration as an alternative mechanism of PKC{epsilon} activation.26 This was an attractive proposition, because our previous work demonstrated that HCs produce large amounts of ROS7 and because others have shown that HCs express also high levels of active iNOS.29 Both NADPH oxidase-generated superoxide anion and NO together produce ONOO– as a major agent responsible for the nitration of tyrosine residues in proteins.28 Our demonstration that tyrosine nitrosylation and kinase activity of PKC{epsilon} are reduced when HCs are treated with NAC shows that nitration of tyrosine residues is actively taking place in HCs and is likely to be the source of PKC{epsilon} activation in these cells. Moreover, subcellular fractionation suggested that the process of nitration is taking place on mitochondria where ROS are products of oxidative phosphorylation associated with mitochondrial respiration.

In our initial experiments, we had indication that PKC{delta} may also be involved in ERK activation in HCs. Although we could not affect ERK activation by PKC{delta} knockdown, rottlerin (an inhibitor thought to be specific for this PKC isoform) did inhibit ERK activation in HCs. However, because rottlerin is known to uncouple oxidative phosphorylation from mitochondrial respiration,21 we believe that the effect of this inhibitor was due to an interference with the ROS production required for PKC{epsilon} nitrosylation on the mitochondrial membrane rather than to the inhibition of PKC{delta}.

Apart from mitochondrial respiration, ROS production in HCs involves also the newly described presence of NOX5 in the plasma membrane of these cells.7 In the presence of previously described high levels of intracellular Ca2+,44 this oxidase produces the bulk of ROS found in HCs leading to pronounced inhibition of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1.7 The resulting potentiation of protein tyrosine kinase-dependent signals4 contributes to the persistent activation state of HCs.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates a central role of PKC{epsilon} in the constitutive activation of ERK and Rac1 in HCs. PKC{epsilon} is activated by high levels of the ROS and NO produced in these cells. NOX5-generated ROS also potentiate and maintain Src family kinase-dependent signals by inhibiting SHP-1. PKC{epsilon} can bind and directly activate p60src40 and also maintain p60src activity through a Rac1-dependent feedback mechanism involving p60src interaction with cytoskeleton.12 Another Src family kinase, most likely p56lyn, appears to be involved at some stage in the process of PKC{epsilon}-dependent ERK activation. Taken together, our data support a model of coordinated constitutive activation of Rac and ERK in HCs (Figure 8) . This activation could explain both the unique morphology and the previously reported prolonged survival of HCs, and strongly implicates activation of PKC{epsilon} and Src family kinases in the malignant transformation of these cells.


   Acknowledgements
 
We are grateful to Professor Alan Hall (University College London, London, UK) for the gift of the plasmid clone pGEX-PAK and to Dr. Stephen Feller (Cancer Research UK, Oxford, UK) for the provision of mAb 327.


   Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to Dr. Joseph R. Slupsky, Department of Haematology, University of Liverpool, Third Floor Duncan Building, Daulby St., Liverpool, UK L69 3GA. E-mail: jslupsky{at}liverpool.ac.uk

Supported by grants from the Leukaemia Research Fund UK (to J.C.C., M.Z., and J.R.S.).

J.R.S. and A.S.K. contributed equally to this work.

Accepted for publication November 2, 2006.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cawley JC, Zuzel M, Caligaris-Cappio F: Tallman MS Polliack A eds. Biology of the Hairy Cell 2000:pp 9-18 Harwood Academic Press, Amsterdam
  2. Burthem J, Cawley JC: Hairy-Cell Leukaemia 1996 Springer-Verlag, London
  3. Zhang X, Machii T, Matsumura I, Ezoe S, Kawasaki A, Tanaka H, Ueda S, Sugahara H, Shibayama H, Mizuki M, Kanakura Y: Constitutively activated Rho guanosine triphosphatases regulate the growth and morphology of hairy cells. Int J Hematol 2003, 77:263-273[Medline]
  4. Kamiguti AS, Harris RJ, Slupsky JR, Baker P, Cawley J, Zuzel M: Regulation of hairy-cell survival through constitutive activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Oncogene 2003, 22:2272-2284[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW: Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours 2001 IARC Press, Lyon
  6. Benard V, Bohl BP, Bokoch GM: Characterization of Rac and Cdc42 activation in chemoattractant-stimulated human neutrophils using a novel assay for active GTPases. J Biol Chem 1999, 274:13198-13204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kamiguti AS, Serrander L, Lin K, Harris RJ, Cawley JC, Allsup DJ, Slupsky JR, Krause K-H, Zuzel M: Expression and activity of NOX5 in the circulating malignant B cells of hairy cell leukemia. J Immunol 2005, 175:8424-8430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kawakatsu H, Sakai T, Takagaki Y, Shinoda Y, Saito M, Owada MK, Yano J: A new monoclonal antibody which selectively recognizes the active form of src tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:5680-5685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Brandt D, Gimona M, Hillmann M, Haller H, Mischak H: Protein kinase C induces actin reorganization via a Src- and Rho-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:20903-20910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cantrell D: Lymphocyte signalling: a coordinating role for Vav? Curr Biol 1998, 8:R535-R538[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Han J, Luby-Phelps K, Das B, Shu X, Xia Y, Mosteller RD, Krishna UM, Falck JR, White MA, Broek D: Role of substrates and products of PI 3-kinase in regulating activation of Rac-related guanosine triphosphatases by Vav. Science 1998, 279:558-560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fincham VJ, Unlu M, Brunton VG, Pitts JD, Wyke JA, Frame MC: Translocation of Src kinase to the cell periphery is mediated by the actin cytoskeleton under the control of the Rho family of small G proteins. J Cell Biol 1996, 135:1551-1564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Frost JA, Steen H, Shapiro P, Lewis T, Ahn N, Shaw PE, Cobb MH: Cross-cascade activation of ERKs and ternary complex factors by Rho family proteins. EMBO J 1997, 16:6426-6438[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Frost JA, Xu S, Hutchison MR, Marcus S, Cobb MH: Actions of Rho family small G proteins and p21-activated protein kinases on mitogen-activated protein kinase family members. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16:3707-3713[Abstract]
  15. Abrams ST, Lakum T, Lin K, Jones GM, Treweeke AT, Farahani M, Hughes M, Zuzel M, Slupsky JR: B cell receptor signalling in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells is regulated by overexpressed active protein kinase Cß. Blood 2006 (epub September 26, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-03-012021)
  16. Ping P, Zhang J, Cao X, Li RCX, Kong D, Tang X-L, Qiu Y, Manchikalapudi S, Auchampach JA, Black RG, Bolli R: PKC-dependent activation of p44/p42 MAPKs during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:H1468-H1481[Medline]
  17. Ding M, Huang C, Lu Y, Bowman L, Castranova V, Vallyathan V: Involvement of protein kinase C in crystalline silica-induced activation of the MAP kinase and AP-1 pathway. Am J Physiol 2006, 290:L291-L297
  18. Heidkamp MC, Bayer AL, Martin JL, Samarel AM: Differential activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades and apoptosis by protein kinase C{epsilon} and {delta} in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 2001, 89:882-890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ueda Y, Hirai S, Osada S, Suzuki A, Mizuno K, Ohno S: Protein kinase C activates the MEK-ERK pathway in a manner independent of Ras and dependent on Raf. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:23512-23519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Corbit KC, Foster DA, Rosner MR: Protein kinase C{delta} mediates neurogenic but not mitogenic activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in neuronal cells. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:4209-4218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Soltoff SP: Rottlerin is a mitochondrial uncoupler that decreases cellular ATP levels and indirectly blocks protein kinase C{delta} tyrosine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:37986-37992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Newton AC: Protein kinase C: structure, function, and regulation. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:28495-28498[Free Full Text]
  23. da Rocha AB, Mans DRA, Regner A, Schwartsmann G: Targeting protein kinase C: new therapeutic opportunities against high-grade malignant gliomas? Oncologist 2002, 7:17-33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Baines CP, Zhang J, Wang G-W, Zheng Y-T, Xiu JX, Cardwell EM, Bolli R, Ping P: Mitochondrial PKC{epsilon} and MAPK form signaling modules in the murine heart: enhanced mitochondrial PKC{epsilon}-MAPK interactions and differential MAPK activation in PKC{epsilon}-induced cardioprotection. Circ Res 2002, 90:390-397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lips DJ, Bueno OF, Wilkins BJ, Purcell NH, Kaiser RA, Lorenz JN, Voisin L, Saba-El-Leil MK, Meloche S, Pouyssegur J, Pages G, De Windt LJ, Doevendans PA, Molkentin JD: MEK1-ERK2 signaling pathway protects myocardium from ischemic injury in vivo. Circulation 2004, 109:1938-1941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Balafanova Z, Bolli R, Zhang J, Zheng Y, Pass JM, Bhatnagar A, Tang X-L, Wang O, Cardwell E, Ping P: Nitric oxide (NO) induces nitration of protein kinase C{epsilon} (PKC{epsilon}), facilitating PKC{epsilon} translocation via enhanced PKC{epsilon}-RACK2 interactions: a novel mechanism of NO-triggered activation of PKC{epsilon}. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:15021-15027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Abou-Mohamed G, Johnson JA, Jin L, El-Remessy AB, Do K, Kaesemeyer WH, Caldwell RB, Caldwell RW: Roles of superoxide, peroxynitrite, and protein kinase C in the development of tolerance to nitroglycerin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004, 308:289-299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Radi R: Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:4003-4008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Roman V, Zhao H, Fourneau J-M, Marconi A, Dugas N, Sigaux F, Kolb J-P: Expression of a functional inducible nitric oxide synthase in hairy cell leukemia and ESKOL cell line. Leukemia 2000, 14:696-705[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Towatari M, Lida H, Tanimoto M, Iwata H, Hamaguchi M, Saito H: Constitutive activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in acute leukemia cells. Leukemia 1997, 11:479-484[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Kim S-C, Hahn J-S, Min Y-H, Yoo N-C, Ko Y-W, Lee W-J: Constitutive activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in human acute leukemias: combined role of activation of MEK, hyperexpression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and downregulation of a phosphatase, PAC1. Blood 1999, 93:3893-3899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sivaraman VS, Wang H-y, Nuovo GJ, Malbon CC: Hyperexpression of mitogen-activated protein kinase in human breast cancer. J Clin Invest 1997, 99:1478-1483[Medline]
  33. Satyamoorthy K, Li G, Gerrero MR, Brose MS, Volpe P, Weber BL, van Belle P, Elder DE, Herlyn M: Constitutive mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in melanoma is mediated by both BRAF mutations and autocrine growth factor stimulation. Cancer Res 2003, 63:756-759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Emrick MA, Hoofnagle AN, Miller AS, Eyck LFT, Ahn NG: Constitutive activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 by synergistic point mutations. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:46469-46479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Grammer TC, Blenis J: Evidence for MEK-independent pathways regulating the prolonged activation of the ERK-MAP kinases. Oncogene 1997, 14:1635-1642[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Jackson DN, Foster DA: The enigmatic protein kinase C{delta}: complex roles in cell proliferation and survival. FASEB J 2004, 18:627-636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Besson A, Davey A, Robbins SM, Yong VW: Differential activation of ERKs to focal adhesions by PKC{epsilon} is required for PMA-induced adhesion and migration of human glioma cells. Oncogene 2001, 20:7398-7407[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Xuan Y-T, Guo Y, Zhu Y, Wang O-L, Rokosh G, Messing RO, Bolli R: Role of the protein kinase C-{epsilon}-Raf-1-MEK-1/2-p44/42 MAPK signaling cascade in the activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 and 3 and induction of cyclooxygenase-2 after ischemic preconditioning. Circulation 2005, 112:1971-1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Song C, Vondriska TM, Wang G-W, Klein JB, Cao X, Zhang J, Kang YJ, D’Souza S, Ping P: Molecular conformation dictates signaling module formation: example of PKC{epsilon} and Src tyrosine kinase. Am J Physiol 2002, 282:H1166-H1171
  40. Vondriska TM, Zhang J, Song C, Tang X-L, Cao X, Baines CP, Pass JM, Wang S, Bolli R, Ping P: Protein kinase C{epsilon}-Src modules direct signal transduction in nitric oxide-induced cardioprotection: complex formation as a means for cardioprotective signaling. Circ Res 2001, 88:1306-1313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ridley AJ: Rho family proteins and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 1999, 22:1-22[Medline]
  42. Tapon N, Hall A: Rho, Rac and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the organization of the actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997, 9:86-92[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Prekeris R, Hernandez RM, Mayhew MW, White MK, Terrian DM: Molecular analysis of the interactions between protein kinase C-{epsilon} and filamentous actin. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:26790-26798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Génot E, Bismuth G, Degos L, Sigaux F, Wietzerbin J: Interferon-{alpha} downregulates the abnormal intracytoplasmic free calcium concentration of tumor cells in hairy cell leukemia. Blood 1992, 80:2060-2065[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slupsky, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zuzel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slupsky, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zuzel, M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS