| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
(TNF-
) Receptor-1 and Confers Resistance to TNF-
-Induced Apoptosis in T Cells



From the Divisions of Clinical Research* and Cancer Research,
National Health Research Institutes, Taipei; the Department of Nursing,
National Taichung Nursing College, Taichung; and the Graduate Institutes of Basic Medicine
and Microbiology and Immunology,¶ National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
), by EBV latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1). One bewildering observation of HPS patients is relapsing disease or progression to T-cell lymphoma. This finding raises the question whether EBV LMP-1-expressing T cells may survive and proliferate in the cytokine milieu of HPS. To explore this possibility, we tested the sensitivity of LMP-1-expressing T cells to apoptosis in the presence of TNF-
. LMP-1 up-regulated TNF-
through TRAF2,5 and nuclear factor-
B pathway in T cells. The LMP-1-expressing T cells then became resistant to TNF-
-induced apoptosis. Interestingly, the expression of TNFR1 was remarkably down-regulated by LMP-1 in T cells. Furthermore, the TNF-
/TNFR1 downstream death signal TNFR1-associated death domain protein was constitutively recruited by LMP-1, and the activities of apoptotic caspases 3, 8, and 9 were suppressed. Reconstitution of TNFR1 successfully reversed the TNF-
-induced apoptotic cascades. Therefore, EBV LMP-1 not only activates T cells to proliferate but also confers resistance to TNF-
-mediated apoptosis via down-regulation of TNFR1 in the cytokine milieu of HPS. This finding provides a potential mechanism to explain the disease persistence or progression to T-cell lymphoma in HPS patients.
(TNF-
) and interferon-
.5-8
The enhanced cytokine secretion has been presumed to play a key role in the pathology of HPS, which includes apoptosis and depletion of the immune system and the impairment of hepatic and pulmonary functions.9-11
TNF-
may induce apoptosis and cell injuries via binding to TNF-
receptor-1 (TNFR1) to activate the TRAF2/TRADD/FADD (TNFR-associated factor 2/TNFR1-associated death domain/Fas-associated DD) signaling and caspase activities.12,13
The EBV latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) has been shown to be the gene product responsible for the up-regulation of TNF-
and subsequent macrophage activation in T cells, but not in B cells or epithelial cells.14
LMP-1 has been shown to be constitutively expressed in EBV-infected T cells.15-17
LMP-1 belongs to the protein superfamily of TNFR and is reported to be a strong transactivator of viral and cellular genes.18-21
In B cells and epithelial cells, the signaling pathway of LMP-1 has been extensively studied. LMP-1 can mediate its function via two effector regions at its C-terminal cytoplasmic domains, CTAR-1 and CTAR-2. CTAR-1 and CTAR-2 can separately bind TRAFs and TRADD, resulting in the activation of transcription factors nuclear factor (NF)-
B and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK).22,23
The activation of NF-
B provides the molecular mechanism for LMP-1-induced cell proliferation and transformation.24,25
The molecular and biological effects of LMP-1 in T cells, however, are relatively poorly understood. We recently demonstrated that LMP-1 can up-regulate Th1 cytokines such as TNF-
and interferon-
through the TRAFs/NF-
B/SAP/ERK signal pathway in T cells, subsequently leading to cytokine storm and tissue injuries as observed in patients with HPS.26
Although current therapy has been successfully used to control HPS in patients,27,28
a substantial percentage of patients who received initial treatment may develop relapsing disease or even progress to T-cell lymphoma.29,30
Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate whether EBV-infected T cells are less sensitive to the cytokine-mediated cytotoxicity than the surrounding uninfected or bystander cells and hence survive or proliferate in the cytokine milieu of HPS. In this study, we performed a series of experiments to test this hypothesis. First, we tested whether LMP-1-expressing T cells are relatively resistant to TNF-
-induced apoptosis, compared with control T cells. The activities of caspases 3, 8, and 9 and cytochrome c were then examined. Second, the regulation of TNFR1 and TRADD by LMP-1 was studied with or without the presence of exogenous TNF-
. We demonstrated that LMP-1 expression could down-regulate TNFR1 and recruit TRADD to block the TNF-
-mediated apoptotic pathway. These findings provide a potential mechanism to explain the persistent disease or the progression to T-cell lymphoma in HPS patients.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The EBV-negative T-cell lines H9 and HUT78 were used in this study. These cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (JRH, Lenexa, NY) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (JRH) in 250-ml tissue culture flasks (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and were grown at 37°C in a 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere with twice weekly feeding. Cells used for the following experiments were in the exponential phase of growth. For human primary T cells, CD3+ T cells were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells by density centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Cells labeled with anti-CD3 microbeads (20 µl per 10 million cells; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and separated on MACS LS column (Miltenyi Biotec) were collected for studies. All of the procedures were performed according to the manufacturers instructions. The purity of sorted CD3+ cells was further evaluated by flow cytometry.
Transiently Transfected and Stable Cell Lines Expressed LMP-1
The LMP-1-expressing constructs were based on B95.8 EBV-derived LMP-1 sequences31
in the pSG5 vector, which contain the SV40 early promoter and a ß-globin intron upstream of the cloning site. These vectors contain the selection markers Ampr and Neor expressed from the SV40 ori. The stable LMP-1-expressing H9 and HUT78 cell lines have been well established previously.14
The transient LMP-1-expressing H9 cells were transfected by electroporation (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using 0, 2, 5, or 7.5 µg of plasmids and 2 x 106 cells in 300 µl of serum-free RPMI 1640 (see Figures 3B and 4B
). The highest transfection efficiency was 30% in transient expression. For transient expression of LMP-1 in human primary T cells, the purified CD3+ T cells were transfected by Nucleofector with program V-24 (Amaxa Biosystem, Cologne, Germany). To define the signal of LMP-1 that is responsible for TRAFs/NF-
B/TNF-
transactivation, expression plasmids of dominant-negative TRAF2/TRAF5/I
B mutants (kindly provided by Prof. T. Watanabe, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) were used.32,33
To restore the expression of TNFR1, the constructs containing full-length cDNA of TNFR1 (kindly provided by Professor Shie-Liang Hsieh, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan) and control vector were used.34
For co-transfection, a total of 2 x 106 cells and 5.0 µg of DNA were used with electroporation. The co-transfected cells were then selected by diluting 1:10 in RPMI 1640 medium containing 800 µg/ml neomycin. The concentration of neomycin was subsequently reduced to 400 µg/ml after 1 week of selection. The surviving cells were collected and expanded for further analysis.
|
To detect the apoptosis rate of cells with or without LMP-1 expression, cells were spun down and resuspended in 200 µl of phosphate-buffered saline buffer. DNA fragmentation in apoptotic cells was detected using DNA fragmentation assay kits (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). According to the manufacturers instructions, T-lymphoid cells were fixed on poly-L-lysine-coated slides. For TUNEL (terminal dUTP nick-end labeling)/DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-dihydrochloride) staining, cells were covered by TUNEL/DAPI solution (0.01 µg/ml) and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. Cells were then photographed by fluorescence microscopy (BX51; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). Finally, aliquots of 5 µl of annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and 5 µl of propidium iodide (PI, 50 µg/ml stock solution; Pharmingen) were added, and the cells were incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Then, 400 µl of binding buffer (10 mmol/L Hepes/NaOH, pH 7.4, 140 mmol/L NaCl, and 2.5 mmol/L CaCl2) was added to each tube, and the samples were analyzed by flow cytometry analysis (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA).
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Cytotoxicity Bioassay of TNF-
Secreted in the Culture Supernatant
To further verify the TRAFs/NF-
B signaling in LMP-1-induced TNF-
secretion, the effects of TRAF2/5- or I
B-dominant-negative mutants on TNF-
secretion were examined. The TNF-
levels in culture supernatants of LMP-1-transfected T cells were measured as previously described.8
Monoclonal antibodies that react to specific epitopes on the TNF-
molecules were used in the ELISA tests (Bender MedSystems, Vienna, Austria). Aliquots of the volume of the supernatants of LMP-1-expressing T cells were obtained from 106 viable cells. Supernatants were harvested by filtration through a 0.45-µm pore size filter (Costar, Cambridge, MA) to exclude cell debris. The standard curve was created by plotting the mean absorbance for each standard concentration. The sensitivity of the ELISA test for TNF-
was 1.5 pg/ml.
The activity of TNF-
produced by LMP-1-expressing H9 cells could be further determined by bioassays based on cytokine-induced cytotoxicity of a TNF-sensitive murine WEHI164-13 fibrosarcoma line. A serial dilution of filtered conditioned medium of LMP-1-expressing H9 cells, leaving a final volume of 50 µl, were cocultured with 50 µl of WEHI164-13 cells at a concentration of 5 x 105 cells/ml for an additional 36 hours, and cell viabilities were counted by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay. The specificity of the response was assessed by adding neutralizing anti-TNF-
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) to the dilutions of the samples.
Reporter Assays for NF-
B and TNF-
To confirm further the importance of the NF-
B signal pathway in the enhancement of TNF-
in LMP-1-H9 cells, a reporter gene assay to detect NF-
B activity and TNF-
promotion was performed. A NF-
B site-dependent luciferase vector p6x-
B-Luc as described previously was used for NF-
B activity assay.35
The genomic DNA products of the TNF-
promoter region were directly amplified by the polymerase chain reaction method. Primers for the promoter sequences (from 1052 to +126) of TNF-
were used. Sequencing was applied to check the accuracy of polymerase chain reaction amplification and the orientation of the inserted sequence.14
Luciferase expression vector driven by the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter (pRL-TK; Promega, Madison, WI) was co-transfected to standardize each experiment as previously described.26
For H9 T-cell lines, 5 x 104 cells were transfected using electroporation. Co-transfection of unrelated proteins such as ß-galactosidase showed no effects on the NF-
B-driven luciferase activity. Representative results of triplicated experiments with mean and SD are shown in the figures.
Coimmunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting
To clarify the signal transduction of TNF-
/TNFR1 pathway in LMP-1-expressing H9 cells, the interaction between TRADD and TNFR1 or LMP-1 was studied. Immunoblotting experiments to detect the expression of the transduced gene and coimmunoprecipitation were done as previously described.33
When indicated, aliquots of whole cell lysates were removed for immunoblots. Anti-LMP-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (CS1-4; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-pan-caspase-3 mouse antibody (C5737; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti-caspase-3 p17 goat antibody, anti-caspase-9 p10 mouse antibody, anti-cytochrome c mouse antibody, anti-TNFR1 mouse antibody, anti-TRAF2 rabbit antibody, anti-TRAF5 goat antibody, anti-TRADD rabbit antibody, and anti-
-actin goat antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used. Enhanced chemiluminescence kits (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) were then used for antibody binding.
Immunofluorescence Staining
To define the subcellular location of TRADD in LMP-1-H9 cells, double-labeling immunostaining was done. Cells in suspension culture were first washed twice in Tris-buffered saline with 2% bovine serum albumin. Cytospin samples were prepared using 104 cells and fixed with 100% methanol for 10 minutes. The staining procedure was performed as previously described.26 The fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies, bovine anti-mouse fluorescein isothiocyanate and rabbit anti-goat rhodamine (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), were used. Signals were detected by fluorescence microscopy (BX51; Olympus Optical).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical evaluation was performed by analysis of variance (m x n factorial design), and multiple comparisons between two groups were evaluated by means of Duncans new multiple range test. All data were expressed as SEM, and statistical significance was defined as *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
via the TRAF2/TRAF5/NF-
B Signal Pathway in T Cells
To confirm further the observation on the up-regulation of TNF-
by LMP-1 in previous studies,26
Western blotting and ELISA assays were performed to assess the production and secretion of TNF-
by EBV LMP-1. To clarify the signal pathway involving in the up-regulation of TNF-
by LMP-1, dominant-negative constructs of TRAF2, TRAF5, or I
B plasmids were separately transfected into LMP-1-expressing H9 cells. The results showed that LMP-1 expression could significantly enhance the production and secretion of TNF-
(Figure 1A)
. In both studies, transfection of dominant-negative constructs of TRAF2, TRAF5, and I
B significantly inhibited the production and secretion of TNF-
up-regulated by LMP-1 as determined by immunoblotting (Figure 1A
, top; 65% inhibition for pTRAF2DN, 81% inhibition for pTRAF5DN, and 69% inhibition for pI
BDN, as compared with pLMP-1-transfectant) and ELISA test (Figure 1A
, bottom; 72% inhibition for pTRAF2DN, 43% inhibition for pTRAF5DN, and 57% inhibition for I
BDN) in LMP-1-transfected H9 T cells. To confirm further the transcriptional regulation of TNF-
under LMP-1 signaling, a reporter plasmid containing TNF-
promoter and NF-
B driving sequence were constructed and co-transfected in the LMP-1-H9 sublines. Consistently, the transcriptional activities of TNF-
promoter by LMP-1 could be abolished by three dominant-negative plasmids as shown in Figure 1B
.
|
produced by LMP-1-expressing T cells were further determined by bioassays based on cytokine-induced cytotoxicity of a TNF-
-sensitive murine WEHI164-13 fibrosarcoma line. The cell viability of WEHI164-13 was significantly decreased (45%) by treating with culture supernatant obtained from LMP-1 H9 cells (Figure 1C)
-induced cytotoxicity, the T cells were treated with exogenous TNF-
for 3 days, and viability was measured by MTT assay (Figure 1D)
B/TRAF2/TRAF5 dominant-negative constructs resulted in an increase of apoptotic death of LMP-1-transfected T cells. Likewise, the cell viabilities of dominant-negative transfectants decreased to 68% for TRAF2DN, 77% for TRAF5DN, and 46% for I
BDN, lower than the 98% of LMP-1-expressing T cells. Taken together, the results shown above indicated that EBV LMP-1 could specifically up-regulate TNF-
via the TRAF2,5/NF-
B pathway in LMP-1-expressing T cells.
LMP-1-Expressing T Cells Were Resistant to Apoptosis Induced by Exogenous TNF-
To clarify whether the EBV-infected T cells are resistant to TNF-
-induced apoptosis in a paracrine or autocrine manner, we first assessed the apoptosis of LMP-1-expressing and mock control-transfected H9 T cells under stimulation with exogenous recombinant TNF-
(25 ng/ml for 48 hours after 1 day of incubation with serum starvation) by oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation assay (Figure 2A
, left). In the presence of exogenous TNF-
, the degree of DNA fragmentation was enhanced in the mock pSG5-H9 cells, although only mildly detected in the LMP-1-expressing cells. Similar observation of the apoptotic phenomenon was demonstrated by DAPI and TUNEL double staining (Figure 2A
, middle). The percentages of apoptotic cells of LMP-1 transfectants were significantly lower than that of mock-H9 cells (LMP-1 H9, 57.5%; pSG5 H9, 24.6%; P < 0.05). Apoptosis was further assessed by annexin V and PI staining and flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of late apoptosis cells was reduced in LMP-1-expressing cells (Figure 2A
, right).
|
, were significantly suppressed by LMP-1 transfection. The expression of LMP-1 led to the reduction of processed 32-kd fragment for caspase-9 and 16.5-kd fragment for caspase-3 together with the reappearance of the intact 47-kd caspase-9 in the immunoblotting. The transfection of dominant-negative TRAF2 could reverse the release levels of cytochrome c and the activities of caspases 3 and 9, indicating that caspases 3 and 9 were indeed activated during the TNF-
-induced cell death and suppressed by LMP-1 expression. Similar inhibitory effect was also demonstrated in the activity of caspase-8 as measured by luminescent assay (Figure 2C)
-induced cell death could be inhibited by LMP-1 expression in T cells. Down-Regulation of p55 TNFR1 by LMP-1 in T-Cell Lines and in Primary T Cells
Next, we tried to clarify the protection mechanism of TNF-
-induced apoptosis by examining the expression of TNFR1 in LMP-1-expressing T cells. The receptor of TNF-
, p55 TNFR1, was first examined by Western blotting in LMP-1-expressing T-cell lines H9 and HUT78. To observe the phenomenon in normal condition, human primary T cells were also included in this study. Abundant p55 TNFR1 protein was detected in both control T-cell lines and human primary T cells (Figure 3A)
. In LMP-1-expressing T cells, however, the expression levels of TNFR1 were remarkably suppressed, especially in H9 T cells (0.1-fold for H9 and 0.3-fold for HUT78, respectively). The primary T cells revealed similar findings with reduction of TNFR1 in the presence of LMP-1 expression. The inhibitory response of TNFR1 expression was specific and dependent on the expression levels of LMP-1 (Figure 3B)
. However, the LMP-1-expressing B-cell line BJAB, in which TNF-
production was not up-regulated by LMP-1, showed no change of TNFR1 expression (data not shown). Furthermore, the TNFR1 expression could be recovered by the transfection of dominant-negative plasmids of TRAF2/TRAF5 in LMP-1 H9 cells (Figure 3C)
. Together, these data indicated that EBV LMP-1 could specifically down-regulate TNFR1 in T cells but not in B cells. The decreased expression of TNFR1 could lead to agnosia for the ligand binding in EBV-infected T cells and hence escape from the TNF-
-mediated cytotoxicity in the cytokine-rich milieu of HPS.
Constitutive Recruitment of TRADD by LMP-1 in H9 T Cells
To investigate further the mechanism of protection from cell death by LMP-1, we tested the possible association of LMP-1 with TRADD protein, which contains a 111-amino acid death domain with sequence similarity to that of TNFR1. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-TRADD antibody. The immunoprecipitates were examined by immunoblot with anti-TNFR1, anti-LMP-1, and anti-TRADD in the presence of exogenous TNF-
or control medium. As shown in Figure 4A
, the recruitment of endogenous TRADD by TNFR1 in control T cells could be demonstrated only after treatment with exogenous TNF-
. However, this recruitment of TRADD by treatment with TNF-
was significantly blocked by LMP-1 protein (Figure 4A
, top lane). Furthermore, LMP-1 could constitutively engage with TRADD even in the absence of exogenous TNF-
(Figure 4A
, middle lane). The engagement with anti-TRADD assured the equal amount of loading volume (Figure 4A
, bottom lane). Comparable immunoprecipitation experiments were performed by using anti-LMP-1 to precipitate the protein lysates of T cells expressed an increasing level of LMP-1. Likewise, LMP-1 was found to co-immunoprecipitate with TRADD, TRAF2, and TRAF5 protein (Figure 4B)
.
|
stimulation by immunofluorescence microscopy. In control T cells, most of the TRADD proteins were present in the cytoplasm or membranous region, whereas TNFR1 was expressed on the membrane of T cells (Figure 5, A and B)
(Figure 5D)
|
To confirm further that the down-regulation of TNFR1 represents the critical event for the LMP-1-expressing T cells to escape from TNF-
-induced apoptosis, reconstitution of TNFR1 and assessment of its effect on apoptosis was examined. The cytomegalovirus-derived TNFR1 plasmid and control vector were transiently transfected to the LMP-1 H9 cells. In parallel with TNF-
secretion, the activity of the key enzyme, caspase-3, in the apoptosis pathway was found to be activated again by reconstituting TNFR1 in 24 hours on LMP-1 H9 cells (Figure 6A)
. Furthermore, the reconstitution of TNFR1 could properly induce apoptosis on LMP-1 H9 cells (Figure 6B)
. The reconstitution of TNFR1 showed no influence on the secretion of endogenous TNF-
in LMP-1-expressing T cells (Figure 6C)
. By the addition of neutralizing anti-TNF-
antibody to block the endogenous TNF-
stimulation, the TNFR1-reconstituted LMP-1 H9 cells could again escape from endogenous TNF-
-induced apoptosis (Figure 6D)
. Overall, these data indicated that the down-regulation of TNFR1 by LMP-1 in T cells represents a critical event in the resistance of LMP-1-expressing T cells to apoptosis induced by TNF-
, either endogenous or exogenous.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is presumed to be the culprit cytokine.8
Consistent with previous studies,26
we demonstrated here that EBV LMP-1 could up-regulate TNF-
via a TRAFs/NF-
B pathway in EBV-infected T cells. Importantly, LMP-1-expressing T cells could escape and survive from TNF-
-induced apoptosis through down-regulation of TNFR1, providing a potential mechanism to explain the relapsing or progression to T-cell lymphoma in HPS patients.
The most compelling observation of this study is the competition and consequence of two death and survival signal pathways initiated by two members of TNFR superfamily, ie, TNFR1 and LMP-1, in T cells. Although both molecules can interact with TRADD and TRAF2, they exhibit entirely different downstream signaling and biological responses.13,36
The TNF-
-TNFR1 complex elicits an apoptosis process in most events, whereas the LMP-1/TRAFs/NF-
B signal usually protects cells from apoptosis and leads to proliferation and transformation in B cells.37-39
For T-cell-type in this study, the LMP-1-induced signal appears to be dominated over the TNF-
/TNFR1 signals in a unique manner through the down-regulation of TNFR1 and recruitment of TRADD by LMP-1. In the presence of TNF-
, the control T cells showed aggregation of TNFR1 and TRADD, leading to the activation of proapoptotic caspases. In LMP-1-expressing T cells, however, the TRADD molecule was constitutively recruited by LMP-1 and dissociated from TNFR1 independent of TNF-
. In LMP-1-expressing T cells, the activities of the downstream molecules of TNF-
/TNFR1/TRADD apoptotic signals such as caspases 3, 8, and 9 and cytochrome c were remarkably suppressed. Reconstitution of TNFR1 could effectively reverse the caspase activities, resulting in apoptosis of LMP-1-expressing T cells and further supporting that the down-regulation of TNFR1 is the critical event in the survival of LMP-1-expressing T cells from TNF-
-induced apoptosis.
The suppression of TNFR1 by viral proteins appears to be a common mechanism for virus-infected cells to escape from cytokine injuries in virus infection. TNFR1 can also be transcriptionally inhibited by EBV immediate-early protein BZLF1 in HeLa and A549 cell lines.40
EBV may therefore use different viral proteins or strategies to regulate the expression of TNFR1 in both lytic and latent programs to escape from TNF-
-induced cytotoxicity. In recent years, similar findings have been observed in other virus infection-associated immunodeficiencies. The HIV accessory protein Nef can also protect HIV-infected T cells from cell death by inhibiting the expression of TNFR1 or FAS.41,42
The other members of TNFR superfamily, CD30 and CD40, appear to behave in a different manner, although also signaling via the TRAFs/NF-
B pathway. CD40 has been shown to be overexpressing in EBV-infected T or NK cells.43
In Hodgkins lymphoma, there is constitutive overexpression and activation of CD30.44
Distinct from TNFR1 and LMP-1, the adaptor protein TRAFs for CD30 and CD40 do not recruit the death domain protein TRADD and may explain the differential biological responses for the members of TNFR superfamily.45
Preliminary data in our laboratory revealed that CD30 was down-regulated, whereas CD40 was up-regulated, in LMP-1-expressing T cells (H.-C.C. and I.-J.S., unpublished data). The exact role of TNFR superfamily members in EBV-infected cells remains to be clarified in the future.
The findings we observed in the studies of LMP-1-expressing T cells appear to be consistent with the current concept of molecular mechanism of inflammation-associated cancers, involving inflammatory cytokines and NF-
B activation.46-49
As summarized in Figure 7
, the microbial infections may trigger an inflammatory response. The cytokine secretion may result in injuries or apoptosis of the bystander cells, representing the initial events or early phase of inflammation-associated cancers. The activation of NF-
B and subsequent suppression of apoptosis in virus-infected cells, through down-regulation of TNFR1 in this case, may then lead to persistent disease and progress finally to malignancies.50
Therapeutic target on the inhibition of NF-
B signal pathway may therefore be designed for patients with HPS or virus-associated T-cell lymphoma.
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the National Health Research Institutes and the National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan (to I.-J.S.).
H.-C.C. and J.-D.L. contributed equally in this study.
H.-C.C., a Ph.D. student, performed the apoptotic studies, TNFR1 regulation by LMP-1, reconstitution studies, and wrote the manuscript; J.-D.L., a post-doctor, performed the TRAFs/TRADD pathway, caspase studies, and promoter assay; S.-E.C. and Y.C. discussed and supervised the studies; W.-C.H. performed the cytokine assay; and I.-J.S. designed and supervised the studies and finished the manuscript.
Accepted for publication February 5, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |