| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Published online before print May 10, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Columbus Childrens Research Institute, Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy (MDC1A). Here, we show that overexpression of the cytotoxic T cell (CT) GalNAc transferase (Galgt2) is effective in inhibiting the development of muscle pathology in the dyW mouse model of MDC1A, much as we had previously shown in mdx animals. Embryonic overexpression of Galgt2 in skeletal muscles using transgenic mice or postnatal overexpression using adeno-associated virus both reduced the extent of muscle pathology in dyW/dyW skeletal muscle. As with mdx mice, embryonic overexpression of the Galgt2 transgene in dyW/dyW myofibers inhibited muscle growth, whereas postnatal overexpression did not. Both embryonic and postnatal overexpression of Galgt2 in dyW/dyW muscle increased the expression of agrin, a protein that, in recombinant form, has been shown to ameliorate disease, whereas laminin
1, another disease modifier, was not expressed. Galgt2 over-expression also stimulated the glycosylation of a gly-colipid with the CT carbohydrate, and glycolipids accounted for most of the CT-reactive material in postnatal overexpression experiments. These experiments demonstrate that Galgt2 overexpression is effective in altering disease progression in skeletal muscles of dyW mice and should be considered as a therapeutic target in MDC1A.
-dystroglycan, a laminin-binding protein on the extracellular face of the muscle membrane. Although work by Chamberlain and colleagues,20,21
Xiao and colleagues,22,23
and others has shown that dystrophin replacement can inhibit the dystrophic process in mdx animals, overexpression of a surprising number of other genes that are not mutated in DMD also has been shown to have therapeutic benefit: transgenic overexpression of ADAM12,24
neuronal nitric-oxide synthase,7,25,26
calpastatin,27
utrophin,28-30
neuregulin,6
calcineurin,31
integrin
7B,14,15
and CT GalNAc transferase32
in skeletal muscles of mdx animals all inhibit the development of aspects of muscle pathology or disease. In addition, inhibition33
or elimination of myostatin34
benefits muscle regeneration in mdx animals and increases muscle strength.
The relatively robust nature of some of these effects begs the question of whether their therapeutic potential would be applicable in other forms of muscular dystrophy. A logical place to begin to ask such questions is with mouse models of laminin
2 (or merosin)-deficient muscular dystrophy (MDC1A),35
the most common inherited autosomal congenital muscular dystrophy.36
Recent studies, however, suggest that several approaches that were effective in mdx animals did not alter muscular dystrophy in the dyW mouse, an MDC1A model made by homologous recombination of the laminin
2 gene (Lama2) locus.37,38
For example, loss of myostatin had no effect on muscle pathology in dyW/dyW animals despite increasing muscle regeneration.39
Similarly, transgenic overexpression of ADAM12 in dyW/dyW animals did not significantly alter disease progression or muscle pathology despite stimulating muscle regeneration.40
In contrast to myostatin and ADAM12, expression of a recombinant extracellular matrix protein, miniagrin, has been shown to inhibit muscular dystrophy in dyW/dyW animals as well as in dy3K/dy3K mice, an MDC1A model that is null for laminin
2 expression.8,41
Overexpression of laminin
1 also can substitute for laminin
2 in certain tissues in dy mice, including skeletal muscles.42-44
Because muscular dystrophy in various dy animal models (and MDC1A patients) results from a defect in extracellular matrix expression,36,45,46
these data suggest that therapies that target extracellular matrix expression may be more effective than approaches that target muscle regeneration in MDC1A.
One therapy effective in mdx animals that alters extracellular matrix expression is overexpression of the cytotoxic T cell (CT) GalNAc transferase.32,47
The CT GalNAc transferase (Galgt2) is a ß1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase that creates the CT carbohydrate antigen [GalNAcß1,4(Neu{Ac or Gc}
2,3)Galß1,4GlcNAcß] on select glycoproteins and glycolipids.48
In skeletal muscle, both Galgt247
and the CT carbohydrate it creates49
are concentrated at the neuromuscular junction, whereas no terminal ßGalNAc of any kind is present along the extrasynaptic membrane of mammalian skeletal myofibers.49,50
Overexpression of the Galgt2 specifically in skeletal muscles of transgenic mice stimulates the glycosylation of
-dystroglycan with the CT carbohydrate along extrasynaptic regions of the myofiber membrane.32,47,51
Other synaptic proteins that may associate with dystroglycan, including utrophin, laminin
4, and laminin
5 are also ectopically expressed in Galgt2 transgenic muscles.32,47
Because
-dystroglycan requires proper glycosylation to bind to laminin,1,52
ectopic glycosylation of dystroglycan with the normally synaptic CT carbohydrate may stimulate its preferential association with synaptic laminins and utrophin in the extrasynaptic membrane, thereby allowing their overexpression. Utrophin is a synaptically localized homologue of dystrophin that can functionally substitute, at least in part, for loss of dystrophin in the extrasynaptic membranes of mdx muscles,28-30
whereas laminin
4 and laminin
5 are synaptic homologues of laminin
2, the
chain of laminin-2 (
2,ß1,
1 or laminin 211 in the new nomenclature53
), the extrasynaptic form of laminin in adult skeletal muscle.54,55
Some increased laminin expression, particularly laminin
4, is known to occur in dy skeletal muscles,56
but whether this ameliorates the severity of muscle disease is unknown. Overexpression of a recombinant form of agrin in which the C-terminal portion of the protein is linked to its N-terminal laminin-binding domain can significantly alter disease progression in dy animals.8,57
In contrast to recombinant agrin, native muscle agrin is a highly glycosylated heparan/chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan.58-60
Ruegg and colleagues61
have shown that muscle agrin protein can be present at increased levels in the extrasynaptic basal lamina of dyW skeletal muscles.
In this study, we show that overexpression of Galgt2, both in transgenic mice and in adeno-associated virus (AAV)-infected animals, inhibits the extent of skeletal muscle pathology in dyW/dyW animals. Galgt2 accomplishes this, however, via a mechanism that does not require increased overexpression of utrophin or increased CT glycosylation of
-dystroglycan, much as we have recently also shown for mdx muscles.62
Galgt2 overexpression does correlate with increased endogenous expression of agrin, a protein that, in recombinant form, can ameliorate disease.8,41,57
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
N-Acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) were obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Agarose-bound lectins (Wisteria floribunda agglutinin, WFA; and wheat germ agglutinin, WGA) were purchased from EY Laboratories (San Mateo, CA). AAV1-Galgt2 was made and purified by Virapure (San Diego, CA). AAV8-like Galgt2 (rh.74-Galgt2) was made by the Viral Vector Core at Childrens Research Institute. Monoclonal antibodies to dystrophin (Dy4/6D3), utrophin (DRP3/20C5), ß-dystroglycan (43DAG1/8D5),
-sarcoglycan (Ad1/20A6), and ß-sarcoglycan (ßSarc1/5B1) were obtained from Nova Castra (Newcastle On Tyne, UK). Antibody to actin was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Antibodies to
-dystroglycan (VIA4-1 and IIH6) were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Antibodies ß-dystroglycan, CT1, CT2, CT GalNAc transferase were produced in our laboratory. Polyclonal antibodies to integrin
7B, utrophin, dystrophin,
-sarcoglycan, and caveolin 3 were a generous gift from Ling Guo (University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA) and Eva Engvall (Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA). Antibodies to laminin
454,63
were a gift from Bruce Patton (Oregon Health Sciences, Portland, OR). A polyclonal antibody to laminin
564
was a gift from Jeff Miner (Washington University, St. Louis, MO). Monoclonal antibodies to agrin (mAb33, mAb86) and laminin
1 (AL-1) and polyclonal antibody to agrin were obtained from Accurate Chemical (Westbury, NY) or Chemicon (Temecula, CA). Secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, fluorescein isothiocyanate, or Cy2 were purchased from Jackson Immunochemicals (Seattle, WA).
Transgenic Mice
Transgenic mice bearing the CT GalNAc transferase (Galgt2) specifically in skeletal muscles via the human skeletal
-actin promoter65
were described by us previously,47
as were Galgt2 transgenic mdx mice.32
dyW/+ mice were obtained from Eva Engvall (Burnham Institute). These mice have lacZ inserted into the Lama2 gene and consequently have very reduced levels of laminin
2 protein.35
The Galgt2 transgene (CT) was bred into the dyW/+ background, and CT/dyW/+ and dyW/+ were mated to produce dyW/dyW, CT/dyW/dyW, dy/+, and CT/dyW/+ animals. Mice were maintained on a mixed (C57BL/6 x BALB/c) background, and all control animals were littermates derived from the same litters. Galgt2 transgenic mdx mice were maintained similarly on an F1 C57BL/10 x BALB/c background. dyW/+ intercrosses were also set up to produce dyW/dyW animals for AAV infection with AAV-Galgt2. All control muscles for AAV-Galgt2 infection were taken from a mock-infected contralateral limb muscles in the same animal. AAV-Galgt2-infected mdx muscles were also used as controls for comparisons as indicated.62
Histology
Muscles were dissected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane and sectioned at 8 to 10 µm on a cryostat. Sections were either stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or immunostained with various antibodies as previously described.32,47,51,66 Quantitation of central nuclei and myofiber diameters were done as previously described.32,47,66 Determinations of the presence of central nuclei versus CT carbohydrate overexpression were done at or near the midsection of infected skeletal muscles, near their widest diameter. All myofibers were counted in each section analyzed, and all data obtained was used in determinations of significance. Averages of central nuclei represent analysis of individual myofibers where n is always a single muscle from a unique animal, with the exception of AAV experiments, in which the AAV-Galgt2 and mock-infected muscles were taken from the same animal (ipsilateral and contralateral muscles of the same type). All immunostaining was done as previously described.32,47,51,66 Glycolipids were ex-tracted from sections as previously described.49 Iden-tical time exposures were used for all comparisons of immunostaining.
Serum Creatine Kinase Assays
Blood was collected from the tail vein and allowed to clot for 1 hour at 37°C. Clotted cells were centrifuged at 1500 x g for 3 minutes, and serum was collected and analyzed without freezing. Creatine kinase activity assays were done using an enzyme-coupled absorbance assay kit (CK-SL; Diagnostic Chemicals Limited; Charlottetown, PEI, Canada) according to the manufacturers instruc-tions. Absorbance was measured at 340 nm every 30 seconds for 4 minutes at 25°C to calculate enzyme activity. All measurements were done in triplicate.
Infection of Muscles with Adeno-Associated Virus Containing Galgt2 cDNA (AAV-Galgt2)
The tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, or quadriceps muscle on the left side of 2-week-old dyW/dyW or wild-type (dyW/+) mice were injected with 1 x 1010 vector genomes (vg) of AAV1-Galgt2 or rh.74-Galgt2. AAV vectors were produced and purified using the triple transfection method as previously described.67 The mouse CT GalNAc transferase gene (Galgt2) was expressed using a cytomegalovirus promoter. Although not muscle-specific, the preferential uptake of AAV into skeletal myofibers led primarily to myotube-specific expression using the intramuscular injection protocol. Gastrocnemius and quadriceps muscles were injected in a volume of 50 µl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using a 0.3-cc insulin syringe, whereas tibialis anterior muscles were injected in a 25-µl volume. Muscles were always injected at the midpoint of the belly of the muscle. Contralateral muscles (on the right side) were injected with sterile PBS alone. Some control infections were also done with AAV-lacZ or AAV-GFP to confirm that no changes came from nonspecific effects of AAV infection (not shown). After 1, 2, 3, 4, or 8 weeks, mice were sacrificed and muscles dissected and either snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane or placed in RNALater (Ambion, Austin, TX) for total RNA extraction.
Immunoblotting and Lectin Precipitation
Immunoblotting and lectin precipitations were done as previously described,32,47,51 with the exception that multiple extraction protocols were compared. To do this, we extracted identical weights (50 mg) of transgenic, AAV-Galgt2-infected, or control dyW/+ or dyW/dyW muscles with Nonidet P-40 buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 75 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 2 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 1:200 protease inhibitor cocktail; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/urea buffer (2% SDS, 4 mol/L urea, 75 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 1:200 protease inhibitor cocktail). Extractions were performed at 4°C with light shaking for 4 days. Protein amounts were measured from each extract using the Bio-Rad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) versus standard curve made in the appropriate buffer. In all cases protein extraction was on the order of 2 to 4 mg/ml in a total volume of 2 ml per sample (or 4 to 8 mg protein extracted from the original 50 mg of skeletal muscle). For lectin pull-downs, all samples were dialyzed against 10,000 MW dialysis tubing (Pierce, Rockford, IL) against Nonidet P-40 buffer at a minimum of four exchanges of 1000-fold excess volume. After dialysis, protein levels were measured again, and 150 µg of protein per sample was used for lectin precipitations, as before.32,47,51
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Assays
Twenty µg of protein extracted via different detergent methods and dialyzed against Nonidet P-40 buffer was immobilized on 96-well enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates (Nunc, Rochester, NY) by dilution into excess 50 mmol/L sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.5, and incubation overnight at 4°C. Some comparisons were done using nitrocellulose-coated plates, with similar results. Wells were washed with TBST (20 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.4, 100 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.02% Tween 20) and blocked in TBST with 3% bovine serum albumin. Wells were incubated with antibodies against
-dystroglycan (IIH6) or CT carbohydrate (CT2), washed in TBST, incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM secondary antibody, washed, and developed in substrate buffer (50 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 25 mmol/L citric acid, 0.1% o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride, and 0.03% H2O2). Absorbance was read at 450 nm and relative binding determined as before.68
Addition of secondary antibody alone never gave a signal that exceeded 5% of that for the primary antibody, and this signal was subtracted in all instances.
Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Measurements
Gastrocnemius or quadriceps muscles were dissected out under RNase-free conditions and stored overnight at 4°C in RNALater (Ambion). After decanting the RNALater, tissues were kept frozen at 80°C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and further purified on a silica-gel-based membrane (RNeasy-Mini; Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA integrity was determined by capillary electrophoresis using 6000 Nano LabChip kit on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Foster City, CA). RNA content was measured using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Wilmington, DE). Only samples with no evidence of RNA degradation were used for analysis. This criterion excluded one sample from analysis.
A high capacity cDNA archive kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used to reverse transcribe 3 µg of total RNA following the instructions provided. Samples were subjected to real-time PCR in triplicate, on a TaqMan ABI 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) with 18S ribosomal RNA (product no. 4308329, Applied Biosystems) as internal control. Primers and probe against CT GalNAc transferase were custom-made by Applied Biosystems and provided as a 20x reaction mix containing 18 µmol/L each of primers (forward primer sequence: 5'-GATGTCCTGGAGAAAACCGAACT-3'; reverse primer sequence: 5'-GCAGCCTGAACTGGTAAGTATTCC-3') and 5 µmol/L of probe (probe sequence: 5'-CCGCCCACCACATCC-3'). All other primers and probes were purchased as predeveloped 20x TaqMan assay reagents from Applied Biosystems, and the details are provided in Table 1
. 18S ribosomal RNA probe contained VIC dye as the reporter whereas all other probes had FAM reporter dye at the 5' end. Each 25-µl PCR reaction mix consisted of 1x primer-probe mix, 1x TaqMan Universal PCR master mix with AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, uracil-N-glycosylase (AmpErase), dNTPs with dUTP, and a passive reference to minimize background fluorescence fluctuations (product no. 4304437; Applied Biosystems). After an initial hold of 2 minutes at 50°C to allow activation of AmpErase and 10 minutes at 95°C to activate the AmpliTaq polymerase, the samples were cycled 40 times at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. Gene expression was determined as relative changes by the 2
Ct method,69
and the data are presented as fold difference normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA. All measures were done in triplicate for each data point.
|
Glycolipids were extracted twice from 500 mg of pooled skeletal muscle samples (gastrocnemius, tibialis, quadriceps, and triceps) of varying genotypes for Galgt2 transgenic mice and various dyW controls. For AAV-Galgt2-infected and mock-infected muscles, only quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles were used, in which each muscle was infected with 1 x 1010 vg for 8 weeks each. Muscle glycolipids were extracted in 10 volumes of CHCl3:MeOH:H2O (4:8:3, v/v/v) with vigorous agitation. Samples were centrifuged, and the supernatants were combined and re-extracted with CHCl3:MeOH:H2O (4:8:5.6, v/v/v). The final volume was then adjusted by evaporating the upper phase. Glycolipid quantitation was performed by a resorcinol assay with GM2 as a standard. Some lipid profiles were run after purification using anion exchange resin to confirm the presence of CT antigen on charged (presumably sialylated) glycolipids (not shown).
Lipid extracts (20 µg) were spotted on the stacking phase of a HP-TLC plate (Silica 60 A; size, 10 x 10 cm; thickness, 200 µm; Whatman, Florham Park, NJ) and chromatographed using a solvent system containing CHCl3:MeOH:0.05% CaCl2 (50:40:10, v/v/v) with the gangliosides GM1, GM2, GM3, GD1a, and GT1b (Calbiochem or Sigma) loaded on separate lanes as standards.70 Lipids run on one HP-TLC plate were visualized with resorcinol-HCl reagent to identify all glycolipids, while lipids loaded on another HP-TLC plate were immunostained for CT carbohydrate. For immunostaining, chromatographed HP-TLC plates were dried and dipped in hexane, followed by 0.01% PIBM (polyiso-butyl-methacrylate). The plates were sprayed with PBS; blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 2 hours, and exposed overnight to anti-CT carbohydrate monoclonal antibody (CT2, 1:10 in 1% bovine serum albumin/PBS). Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM (1:2000) in 1% bovine serum albumin/PBS and the chromogenic VIP vector substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) were used to visualize the lipid bands containing the CT carbohydrate.
Statistics
Determinations of significance were done using a paired Students t-test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We crossed CT GalNAc transferase (Galgt2) transgenic mice that we had previously shown inhibited muscular dystrophy in mdx mice,32
a model of DMD, to dyW/dyW mice to determine whether Galgt2 overexpression would be similarly effective in an animal model for laminin
2-deficient muscular dystrophy (MDC1A). We analyzed cross sections of skeletal muscles by staining with H&E (Figure 1)
and quantified muscle growth (Figure 2A)
and muscle pathology (Figure 2B)
by analyzing stained muscle sections. Much as we had seen with Galgt2 transgenic mdx mice,32
myofiber diameters were significantly reduced in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscles when compared with age-matched nontransgenic dyW/dyW littermates (Figures 1 and 2A)
. Some hypertrophic myofibers were evident in dyW/dyW muscles, as were regions with smaller regenerating myofibers with centrally located nuclei, both evidence of dystrophic muscle pathology.71
By contrast, little to no muscle pathology was evident in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscles (Figure 1)
. The level of reduction in myofiber diameter between Galgt2 transgenic dyW/+ and dyW/+ littermates and Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW and dyW/dyW littermates was approximately equivalent for the gastrocnemius, quadriceps, diaphragm, triceps, and tibialis anterior muscles (Figure 2A)
. The level of reduction in myofiber diameters in Galgt2 transgenic animals also correlated with reduced mouse weight. By 6 weeks of age, dyW/dyW/CT mice were reduced in weight by 43 ± 3% compared with dyW/dyW animals (P < 0.001, n = 6 to 13 animals), whereas dyW/+/CT mice were reduced in weight by 37 ± 2% compared with dyW/+ mice (P < 0.001, n = 9 to 12 animals). As previously seen, dyW/dyW mice were reduced in growth as well compared with dyW/+ animals (by 45 ± 2%, P < 0.001, n = 12 to 13 animals per condition). This, however, did not correlate with reduced muscle size (Figure 2A)
. dyW/dyW/CT animals weighed less than 6 g in weight at 6 weeks of age (5.8 ± 0.4 g compared with 18.6 ± 0.8 g for dyW/+, P < 0.001). The extremely small size of these transgenic dyW/dyW animals made it impossible to compare issues related to longevity in this model; however, an assessment of the extent of muscle pathology was possible.
|
|
Dystrophic muscles, when damaged, release muscle enzymes such as creatine kinase (CK) into the serum. Serum CK activity, therefore, is a good measure of global muscle damage in the animal. Galgt2 transgenic dyW/+ mice, which are not dystrophic, had serum CK activity levels that were indistinguishable from their nontransgenic dy/+ littermates. dyW/dyW mice, by contrast, had serum CK levels that were approximately four times wild-type levels (P < 0.001). Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW mice had serum CK activity levels that were reduced by 54 ± 9% compared with dyW/dyW littermates (P < 0.01) (Figure 2C)
, and the level of increased CK activity (relative to dyW/+) was reduced by 74 ± 12% (P < 0.01 for dyW/dyW/CT compared with dyW/dyW). As with measures of muscle pathology, however, the level of serum CK activity in dyW/dyW/CT animals remained higher than that of wild-type littermates, unlike mdx/CT animals, in which both measures did not differ from wild type.32
AAV Delivery of the Galgt2 Transgene to Postnatal dyW/dyW Muscles Inhibits Muscle Pathology without Altering Muscle Growth
The effect of Galgt2 transgene expression on muscle growth (Figures 1 and 2A)
complicated the interpretation of the muscular dystrophy findings. CT carbohydrate overexpression most likely impacts muscle growth via its effects on satellite cell biology, and there is an order of magnitude more satellite cells in Galgt2 transgenic muscles than in control animals.47
Most of these cells normally would fuse into myotubes to contribute to their robust growth in the early postnatal period, but they fail to do so in Galgt2 transgenic animals, most likely attributable to embryonic overexpression of the transgene.47
Because satellite cell fusion primarily occurs in the first 2 postnatal weeks, we decided to induce Galgt2 transgene expression at 2 weeks of age to bypass this period of development. We recently showed that this strategy could divorce the therapeutic effects of Galgt2 overexpression from its developmental effects in mdx animals.62
We used AAV to deliver the Galgt2 transgene (AAV-Galgt2) to dyW/dyW skeletal muscles. Most experiments were done using AAV1 serotype, although some were reproduced using the AAV8-like rhesus 74 (rh.74) serotype. Because it takes approximately a week before single-stranded AAV vectors begin to induce transgene expression,76
Galgt2 overexpression would not commence until 3 weeks of age. We first verified that this was the case by performing a time course for Galgt2 overexpression (Figure 3)
. dyW/dyW animals injected at 2 weeks of age were analyzed at 1, 2, 3, 4, or 8 weeks after infection for levels of Galgt2 gene overexpression (via TaqMan qRT-PCR, Figure 3A
) and CT carbohydrate overexpression, as assessed by immunostaining (Figure 3, B and C)
. As expected, based on the work of Danos and colleagues,77,78
AAV1-Galgt2 infection of skeletal muscles resulted in significant Galgt2 gene expression and CT carbohydrate overexpression by 1 week of age, and this peaked by 3 to 4 weeks of age and remained high thereafter. At 3 to 4 weeks after infection, CT carbohydrate could be overexpressed in almost all myofibers (Figure 3B)
, although there was variability in the percentage of myofibers infected in some instances. When the percentage of myofibers with overexpression was high, CT carbohydrate was overexpressed along the entire longitudinal length of the infected myofibers in most instances (Figure 3C)
. This occurred despite the fact that skeletal muscles were infected at the midsection in the belly of the muscle. Analysis of muscles by serial cross-sectioning along the entire length from the midsection of AAV-Galgt2-infected tibialis anterior muscles showed that at least 90% of myofibers overexpressing CT carbohydrate at their midpoint maintained overexpression 450 µm anterially or posterially along their longitudinal axis (n = 3 animals, not shown). Thus, although cross-sectional analysis was done using sections taken at or near the site of injection, similar results were obtained along the entire longitudinal length of the muscle.
|
|
|
We have found similar results in mdx muscles when AAV-Galgt2 was infected at similar times in postnatal animals.62
In those experiments, however, Galgt2 overexpression had an absolute effect with regard to inhibition of muscular dystrophy.62
Galgt2 overexpression in dyW/dyW muscles, by contrast, although highly significant, did not reach baseline wild-type levels in either Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscles (Figure 2B)
or AAV-Galgt2-infected dyW/dyW muscles (Figure 5A)
. One explanation for this difference would be that there was less Galgt2 overexpression in dyW/dyW muscles than in mdx muscles. To assess this, we compared levels of endogenous Galgt2 expression in mdx and dyW/dyW muscle (Figure 6A)
and relative levels of Galgt2 overexpression in Galgt2 transgenic and AAV-Galgt2-infected mdx and dyW/dyW muscle (Figure 6B)
. Interestingly, endogenous Galgt2 expression was significantly increased in both mdx and dyW/dyW muscle (3.2 ± 0.1-fold, P < 0.01 and 36 ± 1-fold, respectively, P < 0.01 for both), suggesting that endogenous Galgt2 expression in diseased muscle tissue may ameliorate the extent of muscular dystrophy in these two models to some degree. Endogenous levels of Galgt2 expression in transgenic control backgrounds for mdx or dyW mice were the same; however, Galgt2 transgenic dyW/+ muscle had slightly increased (approximately twofold) Galgt2 expression compared with Galgt2 transgenic C57BL/10 muscle, the mdx strain control (Figure 6B)
. By contrast, Galgt2 was expressed 60-fold less in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscle than in transgenic mdx muscle and 32-fold less in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscle than in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/+ muscle (Figure 6B)
. Thus, the skeletal
-actin promoter used to drive transgene expression may be less active in dyW/dyW muscle. Even with AAV-Galgt2 infection, in which Galgt2 transgene expression is driven by a cytomegalovirus promoter, Galgt2 expression was reduced (by 4.7-fold) in dyW/dyW muscle compared with mdx (Figure 6B)
. Thus, Galgt2 overexpression was lower in dyW/dyW muscle than in mdx muscle, and this may explain the difference in therapeutic effectiveness.
|
-Dystroglycan Glycosylation with the CT Carbohydrate Is Stimulated in Galgt2 Transgenic dyW/dyW Skeletal Muscles but Not in AAV-Galgt2-Infected Muscles
Because we had determined that Galgt2 overexpression inhibited the development of muscle pathology in dyW/dyW animals, we next wished to determine whether the molecular changes we attributed to the transgenes effectiveness in mdx mice32
also occurred in transgenic dyW/dyW skeletal muscles. In mdx mice and in wild-type mice, overexpression of Galgt2 stimulates glycosylation of
-dystroglycan in skeletal muscle with the CT carbohydrate, and
-dystroglycan is the predominant glyco-protein modified with the CT carbohydrate in transgenic mdx skeletal muscles.32,47
As before, we took advantage of the fact that carbohydrate-binding lectins can be used to distinguish CT-glycosylated and non-CT-glycosylated forms of
-dystroglycan in skeletal muscle. Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) is a lectin that binds sialic acid/GlcNAc and can be used to precipitate endogenous
-dystroglycan from nontransgenic muscles.52
By contrast, Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA) is a lectin that binds ßGalNAc, including that present on the CT carbohydrate,79
and does not precipitate non-CT glycoforms of
-dystroglycan.32,47
Although WFA binds ßGalNAc structures in addition to the CT carbohydrate, it is a far more reliable reagent for identifying ßGalNAc-containing glycoproteins than the anti-CT antibodies when the starting material is a complex protein mixture.47
Therefore, we solubilized total muscle cell protein from dyW/+, dyW/dyW, dyW/+/CT, dyW/dyW/CT, and AAV-Galgt2-infected dyW/dyW skeletal muscles in Nonidet P-40, a nonionic detergent (as before47
), and precipitated 150 µg of protein lysate with WGA or WFA agarose. As with previous transgenic mdx experiments, we found that Galgt2 overexpression stimulated glycosylation of
-dystroglycan with the CT carbohydrate, although less glycosylation was evident in dyW/dyW than in dyW/+ muscles (Figure 7)
. This may be attributable to the 32-fold reduced level of Galgt2 gene expression in transgenic dyW/dyW muscle as compared with transgenic dyW/+ muscle (Figure 6B)
. Immunoblotting with anti-CT antibody showed that
-dystroglycan was the primary, if not exclusive, glycoprotein modified with the CT carbohydrate in both transgenic dyW/dyW and dyW/+ skeletal muscles (Figure 7)
.
|
-dystroglycan with the CT carbohydrate, postnatal overexpression after infection with AAV-Galgt2 did not (Figure 7)
-dystroglycan was present in the AAV-Galgt2-infected WFA precipitate, this precipitated protein did not contain increased levels of the CT carbohydrate. Therefore, postnatal overexpression of Galgt2, although able to inhibit muscular dystrophy, did not increase glycosylation of
-dystroglycan with the CT carbohydrate. This result is similar to our recent experiments with AAV-Galgt2 overexpression in mdx skeletal muscles.62
Were
-dystroglycan glycosylation with the CT antigen able to decrease its solubility in the membrane, it is possible that we may have failed to identify glycosylated proteins using a nonionic detergent such as Nonidet P-40. Therefore, we compared the extraction of muscle samples in nonionic detergent (1% Nonidet P-40) to a denaturing detergent solution (2% SDS with 4 mol/L urea) (Figure 8)
. Levels of extracted CT carbohydrate and
-dystroglycan were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Figure 8, A and B)
. There was significantly more CT carbohydrate extracted with SDS/urea than with Nonidet P-40 alone in all muscles (Figure 8A)
, although the amount of
-dystroglycan extracted under the two detergent conditions was not significantly changed (Figure 8B)
. Other proteins known to be relatively inert to solubilization in nonionic detergent, such as dystrophin, were far more abundant in the SDS/urea samples (not shown). If SDS/urea samples were dialyzed against 1% Nonidet P-40 buffer and subjected to WFA lectin pull-downs, however, there was no substantial difference in the results compared with samples extracted in Nonidet P-40 alone (Figure 8C)
;
-dystroglycan was still the primary glycoprotein glycosylated in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscle, whereas no CT-glycosylated
-dystroglycan was found in AAV-Galgt2-infected dyW/dyW muscle (Figure 8C)
. We did identify a second CT-positive band in all SDS/urea lysates at 95 to 100 kd that was not specific to transgenic muscles (Figure 8C)
. Because CT carbohydrate is present in capillaries,47
this may represent a blood vessel protein. Similar results were also found for Galgt2 transgenic and AAV-Galgt2-infected mdx muscle (not shown).
|
Although it seemed counterintuitive that CT antigen could be overexpressed in AAV-Galgt2-infected muscle yet not be present on any glycoproteins, Galgt2 overexpression has been reported to selectively glycosylate a glycolipid in a tumor cell line.80
To assess if Galgt2 overexpression resulted in changes in glycolipid glycosylation in skeletal muscle, we extracted glycolipids from skeletal muscles and performed antibody overlays to detect CT carbohydrate (Figure 9A)
. In addition, we assessed the contribution of glycolipids to CT carbohydrate overexpression by comparing CT immunostaining before and after lipid extraction of muscle sections (Figure 9B)
. In both instances, we found evidence of increased glycosylation of a glycolipid with the CT carbohydrate in Galgt2 transgenic and AAV-Galgt2-infected skeletal muscle. Increased CT glycosylation was identified on a single glycolipid that migrated differently from ganglioside standards, including GM3, GM2, GM1, GD1a, and GT1b (Figure 9A)
. Of particular note, no increase was observed in GM2 ganglioside levels, which is consistent with previous reports that Galgt2 does not synthesize this glycolipid.48,80
Extraction of lipids from muscle sections showed that significant levels of CT immunostaining remained in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW and mdx muscle (Figure 9, B and C
, respectively). Thus, glycoproteins such as
-dystroglycan probably contribute to CT antibody staining in such muscles. By contrast, very little CT immunostaining was evident in AAV-Galgt2-infected dyW/dyW or mdx myofibers (Figure 9, B and C
, respectively), suggesting that postnatal Galgt2 overexpression occurs primarily on glycolipids. These data are consistent with the lack of identified glycoproteins in AAV-Galgt2-infected muscles (Figures 7 and 8C)
and are the first demonstration that Galgt2 overexpression stimulates the glycosylation of a glycolipid in any tissue.
|
Chains in Galgt2 Transgenic and AAV-Galgt2-Infected dyW/dyW Skeletal Muscles
Galgt2 overexpression stimulates the ectopic expression of utrophin in wild-type and in mdx muscle.32,47
Galgt2 transgenic mdx muscles also have increased expression of utrophin-associated glycoproteins, including dystroglycan and sarcoglycans,32
which are normally down-regulated along the mdx myofiber membrane.81
We therefore determined if utrophin and its associated glycoproteins would be increased in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscles by immunostaining (Figure 10A)
and immunoblotting (Figure 11)
. Utrophin immunostaining was increased along Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW myofibers. CT2 immunostaining also was highly overexpressed in transgenic muscles, as expected (Figure 10A)
. In nontransgenic dyW/dyW muscle, by contrast, utrophin expression remained confined primarily to synaptic regions of the muscle membrane, although its expression was higher on myofibers than in dyW/+ muscle (Figure 10B)
. Similarly, in dyW/+ muscles, CT2 primarily stained blood vessels and neuromuscular synapses (Figure 10B)
, both as previously observed.49,82
By contrast, in dyW/dyW muscles, CT2 expression was increased on some myofibers, much as for mdx,32
but was also increased in mononuclear cells near sites of inflammation (Figure 10B)
. Thus, the increase in endogenous Galgt2 gene expression in dyW/dyW muscle (Figure 6A)
includes a significant component from nonmuscle cells. The total amount of utrophin protein was also increased in transgenic dyW/dyW muscles (Figure 11)
. We also observed a slight increase in
- and ß-dystroglycan expression (both by staining and blotting) in transgenic dyW/dyW muscle. Expression of laminin
4, laminin
5, and agrin were complicated by the fact that they are all increased, to some extent, in dyW/dyW muscle as compared with dyW/+ (Figure 10B)
, much as previously seen.43,56,61
Agrin expression, however, was far more elevated in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscles, whereas laminin
4 and
5 were more modestly changed (Figures 10A and 11)
. Other muscle proteins, including
- and ß-sarcoglycan, integrin
7B, and caveolin 3 were unchanged in transgenic dyW/dyW when compared with dyW/dyW littermates (not shown), whereas laminin
1 was not expressed in any intramuscular structure in skeletal muscles of any genotype examined (Figures 10A and 11)
.
|
|
sarcoglycan, dystrophin, and laminin
2. No significant increase was observed for laminin
4 or laminin
5, whereas laminin
1 signal could not be measured in skeletal muscle. Many of these same genes were also increased when comparing dyW/dyW muscle to dyW/+ muscle. Here, laminin
4 transcripts were the most highly increased, but agrin, ß-
sarcoglycan, dystrophin, and utrophin were again significantly increased. By comparison, Galgt2 transgenic and AAV-Galgt2-infected dyW/dyW muscles did not significantly increase the expression of any of these genes, when compared with dyW/dyW muscle. These results suggest that the increase in utrophin and agrin protein in Galgt2 dyW/dyW muscle is not the result of increased transcription, although transcription of these genes was significantly increased in dyW/dyW muscles.
|
4 or
5 was evident in AAV-Galgt2-infected myofibers (Figure 13)
1 was not expressed in any AAV-Galgt2-infected muscles (Figures 11 and 13)
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have been able to use the fact that both embryonic overexpression of Galgt2 in transgenic mice and postnatal overexpression in AAV-Galgt2-infected muscle inhibit the development of muscle pathology to define candidates that may participate in Galgt2s therapeutic mechanism. For example, overexpression of utrophin can inhibit muscular dystrophy when overexpressed in mdx animals.28-30,83
Postnatal overexpression of Galgt2, however, does not stimulate overexpression of utrophin in infected mdx myofibers. Moreover, Galgt2 overexpression inhibits muscular dystrophy in utrophin-deficient mdx myofibers.62
Postnatal overexpression of Galgt2 in dyW/dyW skeletal muscle also did not increase the expression of utrophin, and we therefore presume that utrophin is not likely to be involved in Galgt2s effects. A similar parallel occurred with regard to CT glycosylation of
-dystroglycan: glycosylation was increased with embryonic overexpression but not with postnatal overexpression. This too is similar to previous results in mdx muscle.62
Durbeej and colleagues43,44
have shown that transgenic overexpression of laminin
1 can inhibit skeletal muscle pathology in dy mice. Here, our results seem quite clear. We found no expression of laminin
1 in any skeletal myofibers of any genotype, making laminin
1 unlikely to be involved. Indeed, although transgenic overexpression of laminin
1 can ameliorate disease, both in dy skeletal muscle43
and in other dy tissues,42,84
there is no evidence that this protein is naturally expressed in adult skeletal muscle.43,55
In contrast to utrophin and laminin
1, our results clearly point toward agrin as a potential mediator of Galgt2s therapeutic effects; agrin protein is increased with both embryonic and postnatal Galgt2 overexpression at levels above dyW/dyW muscle. Overexpression of a recombinant form of agrin, which links the C-terminal region of the protein to its laminin-binding domain (from the N terminus), has been shown by Ruegg and colleagues8,57
to inhibit the development of muscle pathology in dy animals. Xiao and colleagues41
have shown this same construct to work when overexpressed in the skeletal muscles of postnatal dy animals using AAV gene therapy techniques. Unlike Galgt2, however, the recombinant agrin protein used in these studies is distinctly different from endogenous muscle agrin, a highly glycosylated proteoglycan.59,60,85
Although we observed extrasynaptic expression of agrin in dyW/dyW muscles, much as previously published,61
we found much more highly increased expression in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscles. With postnatal Galgt2 overexpression, in which CT overexpression is heterogeneous, the increased expression of agrin seemed to spread beyond myofibers overexpressing the CT carbohydrate. This suggests that CT overexpression may increase agrin expression in trans even in nonoverexpressing myofibers. This certainly would be plausible, given that agrin is a secreted muscle protein. Whether this occurs or not, however, our data clearly show that CT overexpression is a cell autonomous phenomenon with regard to inhibition of muscular dystrophy. It only has a therapeutic effect in myofibers where the CT carbohydrate is overexpressed. Thus, for agrin to be involved, it would have to bind CT glycans or a CT-modified receptor in expressing cells to affect muscle function. Agrin does require proper glycosylation of
-dystroglycan to bind to this cell surface protein,86
and therefore it is not a stretch to think that modifying the glycosylation of the muscle membrane might alter agrin function. Agrin can also be glycosylated, at least in recombinant form,87
with the CT carbohydrate, again lending credence to an agrin-CT model of membrane stability.
It is also impossible for us to exclude a role for other laminin
chains. For example, we found that laminin
4 transcription and protein expression were highly increased in dyW/dyW myofibers, much as previously reported.43,56
Although laminin
4 staining was not significantly further increased in Galgt2 transgenic dyW/dyW muscle, the already present ectopic expression of laminin
4 could participate, along with increased CT carbohydrate, to impact the disease process. Similarly, laminin
5 was increased to some extent in dyW/dyW muscle (much as before56
), although less-so than laminin
4. It too, therefore, may have some beneficial effect in concert with increased CT glycosylation, perhaps analogous to the posited role for laminin
5 in miniagrin experiments.8
Several other approaches have proved effective in dy mouse models, including corticosteroids such as prednisolone,88 apoptosis inhibitors such as BCL2,89 and muscle growth mediators such as IGF1.10 At the moment, we have no evidence as to whether these mechanisms are involved in the Galgt2s therapeutic effect. Other mechanisms involving ECM-transmembrane-cytoskeletal protein complexes, such as those involving integrins, also merit further investigation. For example, overexpression of certain integrins can ameliorate muscular dystrophy in DMD mouse models,14 and some integrins have increased endogenous expression in dy muscle.90 That CT carbohydrate overexpression inhibits skeletal muscle pathology in multiple muscular dystrophy models, however, does distinguish it from some other therapeutic approaches. For example, therapies including myostatin inhibition and ADAM12 overexpression were not effective in dyW/dyW muscles,39,40 despite the fact that they did have a positive impact on mdx muscle pathology.13,24,33,34,91
Although beyond the scope of the current study, it will be of interest to determine the extent to which Galgt2 overexpression will affect other cells and tissues where pathology exists in dy animals. For example, laminin
2-deficient mice have peripheral neuropathy,92
sensorineural hearing loss,93
aberrant myelination,94,95
and defects in synaptic plasticity,96
thymocyte,97
and testicular development.42
These findings show laminin
2 mediates many developmental processes in addition to maintenance of muscle membrane integrity.
Two of our findings point to a CT-glycosylated glycolipid as being important to the mechanism by which Galgt2 overexpression inhibits muscle pathology; First, postnatal overexpression of the CT carbohydrate in extrasynaptic regions of skeletal myofibers primarily occurs on glycolipids because this staining can be removed by lipid extraction. This was true both in dyW/dyW and in mdx skeletal muscle. Second, Galgt2 overexpression, either prenatally or postnatally, stimulates the glycosylation of a single glycolipid with the CT carbohydrate. The identity of this glycolipid is currently being investigated, but its migration pattern on HP-TLC separation suggests that it is not a known CT-like ganglioside (for example, GM249 ). Rather, this migration pattern would be consistent with a more heavily glycosylated glycolipid structure. Such a glycolipid could affect any number of aspects of membrane biology that could serve to increase muscle membrane integrity. Although our studies point in this direction, they by no means exclude the involvement of glycoproteins; Galgt2 overexpression could, for example, glycosylate a membrane glycoprotein such that it becomes rapidly degraded, making it difficult to identify. Indeed, some CT reactive material does remain after lipid extraction, suggesting that one or more glycoproteins are glycosylated with the CT carbohydrate, but perhaps not at levels detectable in the current experiments. The fact that very few proteins or lipids have been identified as being glycosylated with the CT carbohydrate,32,47,62,80,98-100 however, supports the idea that only one or a few CT glycosylated molecules act as the primary mediators of Galgt2s therapeutic effects in dystrophic skeletal muscle.
| Note |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|