| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Published online before print February 7, 2008
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


¶








From the Departments of Pathobiology,*Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine,
Genomic Medicine Institute,
Imaging,||Lerner Research Institute, and the Cole Eye Institute,
The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; the Taussig Cancer Center
and the Department of Genetics,¶Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; the Division of Cardiopulmonary Pathology,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and the Department of Pediatrics,**Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The proliferation of endothelial cells and repair and/or remodeling of blood vessels is currently proposed to occur through complex interactions among mature endothelial cells within vessels and several different types of vascular stem cells, some of which are bone marrow-derived and others resident in the vessel. For example, growing numbers of reports indicate that a subset of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in the peripheral blood circulation give rise to colonies of heterogeneous cells in culture including endothelial-like cells (colony-forming units of endothelial-like cells, CFU-ECs),23 which play a key role in vascular health. Asahara and colleagues24 first reported that CFU-ECs are enriched within the CD34+ fraction of circulating mononuclear cells and that CFU-ECs are able to rescue mice from induced hind limb ischemia. In many reports,17,25,26 cells that gave rise to CFU-ECs in culture were found to be particularly enriched within the CD34+ and CD133+ subsets, which led to the designation of the circulating subpopulation of CD34+ CD133+ cells as endothelial progenitor cells. Subsequent research has revealed that CD34+ CD133+ cells are bone marrow CD45+ mononuclear cells, which are proangiogenic but not true endothelial cells.27 Other studies28,29 have identified that circulating CD14+ monocytes are also capable of developing endothelial cell-like characteristics in vitro, and contribute to vascular homeostasis.28,30-32 However, in contrast to CFU-ECs, the CD14+ monocyte-derived endothelial-like cells do not form proliferative colonies in vitro. Studies have shown that CFU-ECs and CD14+ monocytes, are involved in the genesis of vascular pathology.33-37 Although the exact mechanisms of action are unknown,27 there is growing evidence that CFU-ECs contribute to the formation of new blood vessels in a paracrine manner, possibly by disruption of mature endothelial cells lining the vessel walls or by interaction with high proliferative true endothelial progenitors, ie, the putative endothelial stem or colony-forming cell (ECFC), which serves as the actual building blocks of new vessels.27,38 ECFCs are rare cells among mature endothelial cells and only a minor fraction, which may originate from the vascular wall endothelium, may be mobilized into the bloodstream and migrate through the blood circulation.27,39 Specific cell markers that identify ECFCs are unknown, and hence a proliferative colony-forming cell assay is used to isolate these progenitors from circulation or from among endothelial cells in the vascular wall. The roles of these recently discovered ECFCs in vascular homeostasis and repair is in its infancy, but circulating ECFC numbers are increased in patients with coronary vascular disease.40 Similarly, the interactions between ECFCs and CFU-ECs in the formation of new blood vessels are unknown. However, the relatively high frequency (400/ml blood) of CFU-ECs in the circulation as compared to ECFCs (0.2/ml blood) suggests that CFU-ECs may arrive first at sites of injury and facilitate vascular repair by recruitment and activation of rare ECFCs,27 and thus provide a trophic effect on neovascularization.32 Here, we hypothesized that bone marrow-derived and/or tissue-resident endothelial progenitors may participate in the vascular remodeling of IPAH. To test this, circulating CD34+CD133+ cells and CFU-ECs from individuals with IPAH or healthy controls, and resident endothelial progenitors (ECFCs) in the circulation and within IPAH and control pulmonary arteries were quantitated. CFU-ECs were further evaluated for their affinity toward mature endothelial cells in vitro, response to TGF-β-family of cytokines, and proliferation in vivo by inoculation into immunocompromised mice.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Individuals with known IPAH (class 1.1), familial form of PAH (class 1.2), and PAH secondary to sleep apnea or sarcoidosis (class 3.3 and 5.0) were enrolled in the study. Female nonsmoking volunteers with no known diseases and on no medications were recruited as the healthy control population. Venous blood was collected and processed within 6 hours of collection for evaluation of progenitor cells. Clinical information on all PAH volunteers, including pulmonary artery pressures from right heart catheterization, were available from medical history and records. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cleveland Clinic, and written informed consent was obtained from all individuals.
Mutation Analysis of BMPR2
Mutation analysis was performed on DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using the Qiagen DNA extraction kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). The 13 exons of BMPR2 and their flanking noncoding regions were amplified in 15 fragments by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following standardized protocol. One times Hotstar mastermix was supplemented with 1x Q solution (Qiagen), 0.2 µmol/L primers (Table 1)
, and 20 to 30 ng of template DNA in a final volume of 10 µl. Samples were subjected to 40 cycles of PCR, consisting of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 55°C, and 30 seconds at 72°C, with an initial incubation of 15 minutes at 94°C to activate the polymerase and a final extension of 10 minutes at 72°C. Half of the reaction was checked on a 1.5% agarose gel for specific amplification, and the remainder was used for sequencing. Excess primers and nucleotides were inactivated by treatment with shrimp alkaline phosphatase and exonuclease I. Samples were then cycle-sequenced using BigDye terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed on a 3730xl capillary sequencer. Exon dosage analysis was conducted by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification using both a commercial kit (P093; MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and an in-house assay, as previously described.11
|
IPAH and control PAECs were obtained from explanted IPAH human lungs and donor lungs not used in transplantation, respectively. The pulmonary arteries were finely dissected to the distal small arterioles, then cut longitudinally, and incubated with collagenase type II to detach endothelial cells. Cells were grown in MCBD-107 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) on fibronectin-coated plates, and passaged at 70 to 80% confluence by dissociation from plates with 0.25% trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Primary cultures of passages 3 to 9 were used in experiments. The phenotype of endothelial cells was confirmed by immunocytochemistry for endothelial cell-type-specific markers (CD31, dilution 1/30; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark, and von Willebrand factor, dilution 1/200; DAKO) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses for CD31 and VEGFR2 expression (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Immunohistochemical analysis of cultured cells identified that >95% were CD31-positive and >99% von Willebrand factor-positive. FACS analysis confirmed that >95% of the cells were CD31- and VEGFR2-positive. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA).
ECFC Assays
ECFCs were quantified from PAECs obtained from explanted lungs or in the peripheral blood circulation of volunteers. Those obtained from the PAECs are referred to as vascular wall-resident ECFCs and those from the peripheral blood as circulating ECFCs. Frequency of these ECFCs was analyzed as described previously.41 Briefly, single PAECs were sorted into collagen I-coated 96-well plates (one plate/sample) with EGM-2 medium (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum. After 14 days of incubation the cell colonies were scored and frequency of high proliferative ECFCs (colonies with >10,000 cells) were determined. For ECFCs in the blood circulation mononuclear cells were cultured on collagen I-coated six-well plates in EGM-2 medium plus 20% fetal bovine serum as described.41 ECFCs were scored after 3 to 4 weeks.
CFU-EC Assays
Colony formation CFU-ECs were assessed as described by Hill and colleagues,33 by using the commercially available standardized form of this assay (CFU-EC Endocult Medium; Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC). Briefly, mononuclear cells were isolated from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid blood by centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque Plus gradient (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), and a quantity of 4.75 x 106 mononuclear cells were incubated in 1 ml of Endocult medium/well in fibronectin-coated 12-well plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). On day 2, nonadherent cells were harvested by gentle pipetting, counted, and seeded in fibronectin-coated 12-well plates at a density of 1.9 x 106 cells/0.7 ml media. On day 5, wells were washed two times with warm EBM-2 media (Cambrex) to remove nonadherent and weakly attached cells. The number CFU-ECs/well was counted using an inverted microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and were defined as a central core of round cells with more elongated spouting cells at the periphery. Number of cells/CFU-ECs in 20 random colonies was counted under a phase-contrast inverted microscope at a final magnification of x630.
Clonality Analysis
DNA was extracted from total blood leukocytes and from CFU-EC cultures (1 to 3 x 105 cells) using Qiagen kits. X-inactivation patterns were determined using the HUMARA assay.42 Briefly, this assay determines the methylation status of the human androgen receptor gene by combining analysis of a polymorphic trinucleotide repeat in exon 1 with restriction digestion of differentially methylated sites in the promoter, using methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. Methylation of the promoter marks the inactive X-chromosome in each cell. Analyses were conducted essentially as described42 using HhaI as the methylation-sensitive enzyme and RsaI as the control enzyme. Samples were run on an ABI-3730xl sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Peak height ratios in HhaI-digested samples were normalized to control digests. Normalized ratios in CFU-ECs were then compared to total leukocyte DNA from the same patient.
Flow Cytometry
CD34+CD133+ bone marrow-derived proangiogenic progenitors in the peripheral blood circulation were quantified by staining with CD34-FITC (Becton Dickinson) and CD133-PE (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) monoclonal antibodies. Isotype-matched irrelevant antibodies were used as negative controls for nonspecific binding. Samples were analyzed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson) flow cytometer. Events (0.5 x 106) were acquired and data analysis is performed using Cell-Quest 3.3 software (Becton Dickinson). CFU-ECs were double-stained for CD34 and CD133 expression. In parallel, these cells were stained with CD31-FITC (Becton Dickenson), VE-Cadherin-PE (Becton Dickenson), CD14-FITC (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA), CD33-PE (eBiosciences), CD11b-biotin (eBiosciences), CD45-biotin (eBiosciences), and
-smooth muscle actin-PE (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Streptavidin-PerCP (Becton Dickinson) was used a second step for biotinylated antibodies. Isotype irrelevant antibodies were used as negative controls for nonspecific binding. Samples were analyzed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson) flow cytometer. At least 10,000 events were acquired and analyzed using Cell-Quest 3.3 software (Becton Dickinson).
Gelatin Zymography
Equal volumes of supernatant/cell number were analyzed by gelatin zymography in a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel with 1 mg/ml of gelatin. After electrophoresis, gels were processed by washing with rinse buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mmol/L CaCl2, 2.5% Triton) followed by incubation in buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mmol/L CaCl2 for 24 hours. Gels were rinsed and stained with Coomassie Blue for visualization of gelatinase activity.
Affinity of CFU-ECs for in Vitro Angiogenic Tubes
Adhesion/incorporation of CFU-ECs to angiogenic tubes were assessed using the In Vitro Angiogenesis Assay (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA). CFU-ECs were harvested with trypsin and further cultured in EGM-2 medium (Cambrex) (0.7 x 106 cells/fibronectin-coated 24-well) for 1 to 2 weeks. Adherent CFU-ECs were harvested and fluorescently labeled with CellTracker Green (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Tissue resident endothelial cells from different origins (HUVECs, IPAH PAECs, and control PAECs) were mixed with healthy control CFU-ECs or IPAH CFU-ECs at a ratio of 9:1 in EGM-2 medium and seeded on the angiogenesis extracellular matrix in 24-well plates. After 8 hours, phase-contrast and fluorescence images of the endothelial cells in tube formation were acquired using a DM IRB inverted wide-field microscope (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany) with a x10 objective and a MicroMax charge-coupled device camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ). The endothelial cells networks were manually delineated in the phase-contrast images of each field (three fields/sample) using Adobe Photoshop CS (San Jose, CA) and subsequently skeletonized using Image-Pro Plus 5.0 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). Total skeletal length and branch-to-branch lengths were extracted from the skeletonized images using Fovea 3.0 (Reindeer Graphics, Asheville, NC). To analyze CFU-EC adhesion/incorporation, binary image skeletons from phase-contrast images were used as masks for corresponding green-fluorescence images in Image-Pro Plus. The resulting green skeletons were thresholded to remove background fluorescence and green skeletal length was calculated using Image-Pro Plus. For each field, total green skeletal length was divided by the corresponding phase-contrast skeletal length to assess the contribution of CFU-ECs to the overall angiogenic tube formation (total green/total tube).
Response of CFU-ECs to Cytokines of the TGF-β Superfamily
Control or IPAH day-5 CFU-ECs were used to analyze their response to cytokines of the TGF-β superfamily. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed, and resuspended in EBM-2 supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum. Either 1 ng/ml of TGF-β (R&D Systems, McKinley Place, NE) or 100 ng/ml of BMP-2 (R&D Systems) was added to the medium. A quantity of 0.7 x 106 cells/1 ml/24-well was seeded on solidified angiogenesis extracellular matrix. At day 9, the number of cell clusters/well were scored under an inverted microscope (Nikon). After fixation, specimens were stained with alcoholic eosin, washed, and mounted in Vectashield mounting medium with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were collected using a TCS-SP AOBS confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany) using a x20, 0.7 N.A. lens. The nuclei were visualized by exciting the specimen with the 351-nm line of an argon UV laser and collecting light from 400 to 480 nm. Cell clusters were visualized with 568-nm excitation from a krypton laser and emitted light collected from 575 to 700 nm. Confocal optical slices were collected with a 1-µm step-size and the resulting z-series were reconstructed into a three-dimensional image using Volocity software (Improvision, Lexington, MA).
In Vivo Inoculation of CFU-ECs
To analyze progenitor cell proliferation in vivo, 1.2 x 106 day-5 CFU-ECs in EBM-2 medium with BMP-2 (100 ng/ml final concentration in 0.5 ml of Matrigel) was prechilled on ice and mixed with cold unpolymerized liquid Matrigel (Becton Dickinson). Other growth factors were not incorporated into the Matrigel to avoid ingrowth of murine cells to the plug. This suspension was then slowly injected subcutaneously between the scapulae of immunodeficient NOD SCID (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) mice using a cold syringe. At body temperature, the Matrigel quickly polymerizes to form a solid gel. After 4 weeks, animals were sacrificed and gels with surrounding tissues were removed and fixed in histochoice. Five-µm sections were cut from paraffin-embedded samples and stained with hematoxylin/eosin or with anti-human β2-microglobulin or Von Willebrand factor (DAKO) or
-smooth muscle-actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and histologically analyzed. For Von Willebrand factor, samples were pretreated with proteinase K for 8 minutes. Immunostaining was visualized by using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen peroxidase. All samples were stained by using an automated biotin-avidin-peroxidase system (Ventana-320-ES; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ). Secondary antibody alone was used as negative control. All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Lesion sizes were quantified using Image-Pro Plus 5.0. Some β2-microglobulin-stained slides were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) and the nuclei were visualized using a Leica TCS-SP AOBS confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems) using a x20, 0.7 N.A. lens. Specimens were excited with the 351-nm line of an argon UV laser and light was collected from 400 to 480 nm. Confocal optical slices were acquired with a 1-µm step-size and the resulting z-series were reconstructed into a three-dimensional image using Volocity software (Improvision, Lexington, MA). The obtained images were analyzed by two independent individuals for quantification of percentage of human cell nuclei. For DNA fingerprinting, the Matrigel was microdissected from surrounding tissue on the sections. Separated Matrigel and surrounding tissue were processed using the QIAamp DNA micro kit and amplified with four different microsatellite markers from chromosome region 2q37. Samples were analyzed on a 3730xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and genotypes were compared to those obtained from leukocyte DNA of the same patient.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed by using JMP 5.1 software program. Analysis of variance or Students t-test were used for comparisons of parametric data, and the Wilcoxon test was used for comparison of nonparametric data, as appropriate. P values <0.05 were considered as significant. Mean ± SE value for each group is provided, unless indicated differently.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peripheral venous blood was obtained from 16 IPAH patients, 3 of whom had the familial form of the disease (from two independent families), 4 patients with secondary pulmonary hypertension (Table 2)
, and 16 healthy female controls. Age, gender, and race were similar among healthy controls, IPAH [age (years): IPAH, 41 ± 3; healthy controls, 38 ± 3; P = 0.3; IPAH, one male/five African Americans; controls, no males/five African Americans; secondary pulmonary hypertension, 54 ± 3, no males/two African Americans]. Medications were similar among patients, and included vasodilators and anticoagulants, and all patients were on supplemental oxygen (Table 2)
. In addition, explanted lungs were obtained at transplantation of five IPAH patients [age (years): 46 ± 7; two males/all Caucasians] and five donor lungs not used for transplantation as previously described.17
Because of limitation of samples, all individuals were not evaluated in all experiments. The number of individual samples, and individuals evaluated, are noted in each experimental result.
|
70% of familial mutations.11
Mutations were identified in two of the remaining IPAH cases (c.76 + 5G>A and c.296T>G, p.C99F); both are novel. Bioinformatic analysis of the G>A substitution at position 5 of the exon 1 splice donor signal using the MaxEntScan:score5ss program (http://genes.mit.edu/burgelab/maxent/Xmaxentscan_scoreseq.html)gave a markedly lower maximum entropy score for the mutant sequence (3.53) than the wild-type (10.10). This mutation is therefore predicted to disrupt mRNA splicing, although RNA was not available from the patient to confirm this. The missense mutation C99F occurs at a conserved residue within the extracellular domain of BMPR2 and, although not reported previously, a different substitution (C99R) at the same position has been identified in both familial and IPAH cases.7 Endothelial Progenitors and Proangiogenic Precursors
To evaluate whether there are high-proliferative ECFCs present within the pulmonary arterial wall of IPAH lungs, single cell analyses were performed on collagen I-coated 96-well plates, using PAECs derived from the pulmonary artery of normal donor lungs not used for transplantation, or explanted IPAH lungs. The numbers of vascular wall-resident ECFCs were similar among IPAH and control PAECs with one case of five control cultures and two cases of five IPAH PAEC cultures giving rise to high-proliferative ECFCs that formed colonies of >10,000 cells from the single cell that initiated the culture. In separate experiments, circulating ECFCs in the peripheral blood of IPAH patients was compared to healthy control volunteers. High-proliferative ECFCs were similarly detected in the circulating mononuclear cells of three of five IPAH patients and five of seven control volunteers. In contrast, early passage (passages 1 to 5) IPAH PAECs had significantly higher numbers of CD34+ cells among the endothelial cells compared to control PAECs [%CD34+ control 1.8 ± 0.7 (n = 4), IPAH 14.6 ± 1.9 (n = 4); P = 0.004].
Given the increased numbers of CD34+ cells within cultures of IPAH PAECs, the presence of CD34+CD133+ bone marrow-derived proangiogenic precursors in the peripheral blood was analyzed by FACS (Figure 1, A–F)
. A higher percentage of CD34+CD133+ cells was present in the peripheral blood circulation of IPAH patients as compared with healthy controls [%CD34+CD133+ cells: healthy control 0.051 ± 0.008 (n = 16), IPAH 0.15 ± 0.03 (n = 10), P = 0.006] (Figure 1G)
. Percentage CD34+CD133+ cells in patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to sleep apnea were similar to control levels (0.05 ± 0.02, n = 4). In IPAH the circulating CD34+CD133+ cells were directly related to pulmonary arterial pressures (R2
= 0.54, P = 0.03) (Figure 1B)
. IPAH patients had higher numbers of CFU-ECs derived from the circulating proangiogenic precursors compared with healthy controls [CFU-EC/24-well: healthy control 48 ± 7 (n = 7); IPAH 484 ± 83 (n = 11); P < 0.001] (Figure 2A)
. Numbers of CFU-ECs were related to percent CD133+CD34+ cells (R2
= 0.418, P = 0.005). These data identify that compared to healthy controls circulating CD34+CD133+ proangiogenic precursors are increased in IPAH. Furthermore, CFU-ECs from IPAH patients had an approximately threefold higher number of cells per colony as compared with controls (cells/colony: healthy control, 27 ± 2; IPAH, 73 ± 2; P < 0.001). Frequency analysis revealed predominantly small colonies in healthy controls, whereas colonies were much larger in IPAH (Figure 2B)
.
|
|
IPAH CFU-ECs Have Higher Affinity for Endothelial Cells and Form Large Cell Clusters in Response to TGF-β and BMP2
Although the precise mechanisms by which CFU-ECs contribute to the vascular pathophysiology is currently unresolved, it is generally accepted that close interactions between CFU-ECs and endothelial cells are involved.43-45
The in vitro endothelial cell tube formation assay, a model angiogenesis system, was used to evaluate the affinity of CFU-ECs for endothelial cells. Green-labeled CFU-ECs derived from IPAH or from healthy control patients were mixed with mature PAECs of control or IPAH patients or endothelial cells originated from umbilical cords (HUVECs). This mixture of CFU-ECs and mature endothelial cells was seeded on angiogenesis Matrigel and CFU-ECs associated to capillary tubes was analyzed. IPAH CFU-ECs associated with tubes formed by HUVECs, IPAH PAECs, and control PAECs. Normal CFU-ECs also adhered to the tubes, however this was significantly lower as compared to IPAH CFU-ECs (Figure 3, A and B)
. IPAH CFU-EC participation in tube formation was higher irrespective of the origin of mature endothelial cells (Figure 3B)
(P = 0.0003). However, control CFU-ECs had a tendency of greater affinity for angiogenic tubes with IPAH PAECs than control PAECs (P = 0.02), suggesting an increased affinity of IPAH PAECs for CFU-ECs.
|
MMP Production by CFU-ECs
To evaluate the proangiogenic environment that is created by CFU-ECs, supernatants collected from CFU-ECs after overnight incubation in serum-free medium (EBM-2) were used to analyze secreted matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and MMP-2. MMP-9 and MMP-2 activity were detected in supernatants from IPAH and control CFU-ECs (Figure 4)
. There was no difference in MMP-9 secretion, but CFU-ECs derived from IPAH patients produced significantly higher levels of MMP-2. Thus, CFU-ECs in IPAH patients are increased in the circulation and are functionally different in proangiogenic potential. These cells form larger colonies, have an enhanced affinity for endothelial cells, form abnormal cell clusters, in particular in response to BMP-2, and secrete high levels MMP-2.
|
These results prompted us to analyze the growth of these cells in vivo. For this purpose, IPAH or control CFU-ECs, were suspended in Matrigel containing BMP-2 and subcutaneously engrafted into NOD SCID mice. After 4 weeks, the Matrigel plugs and surrounding tissues were removed and analyzed. Figure 5
shows the phenotype of the CFU-ECs before injection. IPAH and control CFU-ECs had a similar phenotypic cellular composition of CD133+CD34dimCD31+CD144+CD45+CD11b+SMA+ CD33+CD14–. After inoculation into NOD SCID mice, IPAH-derived CFU-ECs formed cell clusters in the Matrigel plug whereas control CFU-ECs formed no detectable cell clusters (Figure 6, A–F)
. In addition to the cell clusters within the Matrigel plug, IPAH cells demonstrated human cell lesions outside the Matrigel plug, with extension within the subcutaneous tissues of the mouse (Figure 6, B and G–P)
. Staining with human-specific β2-microglobulin antibodies confirmed that the cells in cell clusters and angioproliferative lesions were of human origin (Figure 6, E, H, K, L, Q, and P)
. In two experimental animals, IPAH CFU-EC-derived cells infiltrated surrounding tissue structures of nerve and skeletal muscle (Figure 6, G, H, O, and P)
. The relative numbers of human and mouse cells were further confirmed by confocal microscopy analysis of nuclear organization, and DNA fingerprinting using microsatellite analysis. Mouse and human cell nuclei each have unique structural organization observable by DAPI staining pattern, allowing discrimination and quantitation of human and mouse cells. Cells within the Matrigel plug were uniformly human, whereas cells within lesions outside the plug consisted of 90.5 ± 3.5% human cells (Figure 7A)
. Furthermore, the genotypes obtained from cells within the plug and from cells invading outside the plug matched that of leukocyte DNA of the same patient, confirming that these clusters are human cells derived from the injected CFU-ECs (Figure 7B)
.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our group recently reported that IPAH PAECs have an apoptosis-resistant and hyperproliferative phenotype in cell culture.17 Although high-proliferative vascular wall-derived progenitors were not increased in IPAH endothelial cell cultures in the present study, the expansion of endothelial cells is driven by proliferation of both high-proliferative and low-proliferative vascular progenitors, the latter of which were not quantified in the current study. Conversely, IPAH PAEC cultures contained greater than normal numbers of CD34+ cells, which suggests a role for these cells in the more rapid growth of IPAH endothelial cells in culture. In fact, the in vitro and in vivo assays in the present study document that CFU-ECs from IPAH patients have a significant enhanced angioproliferative potential. In support of a possible intrinsic alteration of these bone marrow-derived cells, IPAH CFU-ECs form disorganized clusters in response to cytokines of the TGF-β superfamily, in particular BMP-2. Greater affinity of IPAH CFU-ECs to angiogenic tubes compared to control CFU-ECs also supports intrinsic alterations of these cells in IPAH. Furthermore, the trend of a greater adhesion of control CFU-ECs to IPAH-derived pulmonary endothelial cells than to normal endothelial cells raises the possibility that an increased affinity or an active recruitment of CFU-ECs by IPAH pulmonary arterial endothelial cells may also occur. Once recruited, the release of matrix metalloproteinases by CFU-ECs as shown in this study, and other factors reported by others,52 may foster an angiogenesis response in the pulmonary artery. Specifically, IPAH CFU-ECs produced much more MMP-2, a protease that plays crucial roles in vascular regeneration. MMP-2-deficient mice are severely impaired in their angiogenesis response to ischemia attributable to impaired proliferative and mobilization/invasive responses of hematopoietic progenitor-derived angiogenic precursors.53 The impairment in angiogenesis is restored by transplantation of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells from MMP-2+/+ mice.53 Previous reports indicate that bone marrow-derived proangiogenic progenitors trigger neovascularization through disruption of pre-existing blood vessels.54,55 Thus, CFU-ECs may play an active role in the promotion of proliferative vascular lesions in IPAH by disruption and activation of the endothelium through release of matrix metalloproteinases and other angiogenic factors. However, the ability of bone marrow cells to mimic blood vessels also raises the possibility that CFU-ECs may incorporate into vessels through a process of vasculogenic mimicry56 and contribute directly to the formation of plexiform lesions.
Although this study does not address directly whether the CFU-EC population participates in the genesis of IPAH, we modeled the local growth with in vivo inoculation of the IPAH CFU-ECs into the immune-deficient SCID mice, a reliable approach used to evaluate dysregulated cell proliferation. In contrast to healthy controls, IPAH CFU-ECs formed large clusters and invasive angioproliferative lesions extrinsic to the Matrigel plug, which confirmed that bone marrow-derived cells with a heightened growth potential are mobilized in IPAH. One explanation for more proliferative precursors in IPAH may be that more primitive progenitors are mobilized into the circulation, which have a survival/growth advantage especially in the hypoxic milieu of the Matrigel plug. In this context, the mobilization of proangiogenic bone marrow-derived cells may be a normal physiological repair response to ongoing pulmonary vascular shear stress and endothelial injury. In support of this, progenitor cell mobilization is intrinsic to hypoxic conditions,57 and increased bone marrow progenitors have been reported in hypoxia-induced animal models of PAH.58,59 However, even if the greater number of circulating cells is part of a reparative response, the aberrant response to TGF-β and BMP-2 in vitro, release of high amounts of MMP-2 and the invasive nature of the CFU-ECs in the xenograft model, strengthen the hypothesis that proangiogenic bone marrow-derived cells might contribute to the progression of IPAH. The associative observations of IPAH together with bone marrow-related hematological disorders supports the concept that bone marrow-derived cells may be the link between the occurrences of these processes. For example, in proliferative disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell, such as myeloproliferative cancers, there is a relatively high unexplained incidence of IPAH,60-62 and radiation therapy or chemotherapy has been reported to result in improvement or regression of IPAH.63,64 Regardless of the role bone marrow-derived precursors play in the disease process, mobilization of these cells is a characteristic of IPAH patients, which offers an opportunity for mechanistic studies using human circulating cells as opposed to lung vascular tissues. These findings also provide a novel noninvasive approach for the systematic investigation of pulmonary vascular remodeling through the evaluation of CD34+CD133+ cells and CFU-ECs as biomarkers. In contrast, the circulating CD14+ monocyte cells from IPAH patients16 do not form proliferative lesions when inoculated into NOD SCID mice (data not shown), confirming that these cells, which are being used in human clinical trials, are unlikely to contribute to hyperplastic endothelial lesions. Future studies are required to determine how the bone marrow-derived proangiogenic precursors and pulmonary vascular wall endothelial resident progenitors interact in IPAH, and if novel therapeutic approaches that target nonproliferative angiogenic mononuclear cells65 will impact on the remodeling and outcomes of IPAH.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Cleveland Clinic Musculoskeletal Core Center (funded in part by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Core Center grant no. 1P30 AR-050953) and the National Center for Research Resources (grants HL60917 and M01RR018390).
Accepted for publication November 29, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Yao, A. L. Firth, R. S. Sacks, A. Ogawa, W. R. Auger, P. F. Fedullo, M. M. Madani, G. Y. Lin, N. Sakakibara, P. A. Thistlethwaite, et al. Identification of putative endothelial progenitor cells (CD34+CD133+Flk-1+) in endarterectomized tissue of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): L870 - L878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Majka and D. F. Alvarez Neovascular capacity of endothelial progenitor cells in the adult pulmonary circulation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): L868 - L869. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Asosingh, S. C. Erzurum, M. C. Yoder, and R. M. Tuder Letter by Asosingh et al Regarding Article, "Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome and Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension" Circulation, March 10, 2009; 119(9): e230 - e230. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-P. Diller, E. Bedard, S. J. Wort, M. A. Gatzoulis, S. van Eijl, O. Ali, M. R. Wilkins, J. Wharton, D. O. Okonko, L. S. Howard, et al. Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome and Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension" Circulation, March 10, 2009; 119(9): e231 - e231. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Smadja, P. Gaussem, L. Mauge, D. Israel-Biet, F. Dignat-George, S. Peyrard, G. Agnoletti, P. R. Vouhe, D. Bonnet, and M. Levy Circulating Endothelial Cells: A New Candidate Biomarker of Irreversible Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Congenital Heart Disease Circulation, January 27, 2009; 119(3): 374 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. de Jesus Perez, T.-P. Alastalo, J. C. Wu, J. D. Axelrod, J. P. Cooke, M. Amieva, and M. Rabinovitch Bone morphogenetic protein 2 induces pulmonary angiogenesis via Wnt-{beta}-catenin and Wnt-RhoA-Rac1 pathways J. Cell Biol., January 12, 2009; 184(1): 83 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Majka, M. Skokan, L. Wheeler, J. Harral, S. Gladson, E. Burnham, J. E. Loyd, K. R. Stenmark, M. Varella-Garcia, and J. West Evidence for cell fusion is absent in vascular lesions associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): L1028 - L1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |